Westport High School - Herald Yearbook (Kansas City, MO)

Page 24 text:

. . .. . . ,. .4,.,.,,.,..-.,.,....--.......g.,,,-LQ-f,,-f,1-,11-sse:r,:f ,e J- .L .,- -- r fx -41-a-5-safe-e191,fee-ssc-.-:m'?..Tr:-::f:'::::1':gL1 ..:. ...., i Y-----t-f1-'11'r1'i:.1 1 ' .1T - i -. ' A-,'- , - -- -- f ' 22 THE WESTPORT HIGH SCHOOL HERALD 2 GIRLS' TEAMS. is the permanent evil of our economic system. He was perfectly at ease and won his audience. Jerauld Dissman was our second speaker. As a substitute plan he advocated federal courts modeled after the Kansas Industrial Court to try all cases of alleged profiteeringg to have a su- preme court at Washington to which all cases may be appealed. Jerry's evident sincerity and earnestness counted heavily in his favor. Our third speaker, Howard Fisk, proved that, since public opinion backs it, our plan is practi- cal. With his characteristic battling instinct he advanced boldly to his conclusion, so at the end of our constructive speeches our team seemed victorious. In rebuttal, Central unblushingly displayed a choice assortment of canned goods and neg- lected to reply to some Very pertinent questions hurled at them by the affirmative. Jerauld Dissman, as first speaker, knocked down one point after another as if they had been nine pins. Howard Fisk, second speaker, came out to slay the foe. By the time he had finished what Jerry began one wondered what remained for Jimmy Reeves to say. A great deal, evidently. In a rebuttal, which was the climax of a whirlwind debate, Jimmy Reeves contrasted the negative arguments with our own. As to the decision, it is sufficient to say that you never can tell what a judge is going to do. Boys' Negative At Manual, Jack Chesney, captain, opened for Westport in opposition to Northeast's affirmative team. Jack's calm manner and clear cut state- ments made his argument very effective. Julius Bishofsheimer, second speaker, made a hit. His grasp of the subject made the affirm- ative sit up and he won the audience by his earnestness and large vocabulary. Howard Wahrenbrock presented our substi- tute plan, that of the Federal R-eserve Bank. He displayed remarkable power in his serious and dignified manner of speaking. Westport's rebuttal speeches were incisive and original, every one being framed while the de- bate was in progress. Unfortunately, this decision, too, was a sur- prise. But like the other, we are proud of our team, rather than ashamed of the result. Bill Roth, affirmative alternate, and James Britt, negative alternate, rendered valuable as- sistance. The brilliant record of their teams- is in a large measure due to them. , , I 3 1 Our Manual nothing Mari negativ ese wow placed Julie ond sp' present was iri Ruth unquali lent de was gi' She 4 persua: affirm: Mari preseni mannei powers ly effe Julie skill ir 1-...rw .-,....-fre, P-...es H... 1- .S . . :L-u,iff11LL:1.:..1Q -Salinger g,4,g,,g'gg,,,Lg,,,gie. --usf q.g.15il --',i:a.:a5ri f- 'Fi ' '--.Q.- - ,-q t 'iq' ' H I I I .,...,,.,, . ' . . .. . . .. , . - 3- v .- --A .-. -haze..-45.4 v.-.-:...:.:,1.,,N

Page 23 text:

-5- ------M--rv . -2-5-1----9-as--G:-rur.,-v:-H-H-elxgffsm-'ffu:1z.r:v1s-x:a1fY:-.1,:..- .-.1-wav-1 9 ' fi- -H-eifh-E' 4'-:1 id many 5 he gave E the im- would be 1 a crisis, econd bit fied with gf to keep ourselves. of every or diary nd, Just you have ,nd think 've heard heavy or st fit the or some- flason or id try to e's gone! :mrds and te, The 'T, '21 9 I-'E'-sf: '? 'X V -If? - 'N 5 Q--fi ,-fr'-.1 . ,, .,,.,,.,1,.,, , ,,- Y, t..-l,... .. .... .--..ii . V 1, A - ' ' -- 3- Q ' 71: P V '51 H T- 'fi q'lE5- zlff'-ffi '.. ' ' A .. . -I-. .., ,I .Yap -Z' ,TAN ' ., ' ,rl ' 2 I a I. 3 Y X 15- 7-5 . .A-sr-1 'V .--1' '. Y - ' -- . ' -'-ST .-if-K . 'Q -3' k Y . ' - 4 fp ffii: ff - ,f-i-.ft ' -5.7-- .l1 .f, --f' . v ' .1 f' .1- f ,Fr ff-- . - ' YQ- . V '. T', ig '1-. ' '. Q.. 1' 5, 3 4- -is .- if 16.1. . b pf. -. I gr .alt-J'!.,2 . ,myjk jg' ,V A A I, ,- A I. N- A -1:14 j if 7 , ,Q In -, N 4 ,Q-Li.5gLE5.'jg l'gf,1-,,',-Q-5.31, - 1 . l' 5' ..,. , . ,F in4j:f,fQf.::1f,'i. -.3 ' i - '-- ' 'Q 'T ' 'ff-E: . , 2 . ., -.3.v,.,I.,V. 1. .Hi ,,- .,,. .,, ,,, , - .........-- V . .. ., . . ..-.nr ,Le-,... ., .. A . -A . . . K - Ah 5.--, -Q. -- -. . -f. ,.-7-.A-LJ Although our debaters found favor in the sight of their judges in only one contest, each of the defeated teams lost by the very narrow margin of one vote. There is honor in defeat when the decision is so close. And the girls' affirmative team, which came home victorious, captured the votes of four judges. The talent displayed by the members of the two teams wias not acquired by personal effort entirely. Much credit is due the second teams who worked unselfishly and struggled valiantly in the task of gathering information and per- fecting arguments and style. Mr. Humphrey and Miss Short, the coaches, were unsparing of time and effort and won the devotion of the boys and girls with whom they worked. The members of the second teams were: Boys, Richard Cohn, Robert Hecker, John Melcher, Robert Rosenwald, Frederick Scharles, Edward Trimble, Edward Weatherly and Dean Wood, Girls, Martha Cowan, Helen Farrel, Henrietta Ginsburg, Clara Hoelzel, Julia Mastin, Floy Robinson and Elizabeth Turner. The boys' debate was March eighteenth, the girls' March twenty-fifth. In both cases the af- firmative teams went to Northeast, the negative to Manual. Girls' Affirmative The victorious girls' affirmative met Central at Northeast. They proved that the federal gov- ernment should prohibit further Japanese immi- gration into the United States, because the Jap- anese are undesirable. Lucile Richards spoke first for Westport. Her manner was calm, her delivery forceful, she seemed more at home on the stage than any Speaker who followed her on either team. Hulda Seidel was second speaker. She proved that the Japanese are undesirable economically. Her gestures were convincing, her manner direct, and withal she showed a remarkable grasp of the Subject. Ruth Hall, captain of the team, was third speaker for the affirmative. The constructive arguments which she presented were so strong and explained so clearly that the affirmative-'s case seemed almost proved even before rebuttal. Miss Hall not only established her own argu- ments convincingly, but so summarized her col- leagues' speeches that the entire proposition was laid before the judges as if it had been her own argument. Hulda Seidel, as first speaker in rebuttal, was never better. Every figure of speech, every ges- ture, added force to an already forceful argu- ment. The second speaker for the affirmative re- buttal was forced to face one of the most serious charges ever made against a statement. Ruth Hall met that charge, answered it completely, and swept the opposition clear off its feet. And then by a happy bit of most effective humor, she placed the affirmative again on top, and it stayed there ever after! Lucile Richards answered the dramatic chal- lenges of the negative with a coolness even more dramatic. With one stroke she showed that Cen- tral had not answered our main point, and there- fore had failed. And after that, there was no doubt. Dorothy Martin was alternate on the negative team and Verona Stuart on the affirmative. Dorothy was the official encourager of her team, and Verona was always enthusiastic and capable. Boys' Affirmative At Northeast our affirmative met Central's negative on the question: Resolved, that the federal government should establish a permanent policy of price control for the so-called necessities of life. Jimmy Reeves, captain, opened the debate for the affirmative. He proved that a permanent policy of price control was necessary, because the public needed protection from profiteering, which

Page 25 text:

--- -was--1--:f . -sv-sa-fieryspa-1syn-fe:Jp::s..rvXLL-.:yL.1:1a-fx11T:--Fme-f,-. .-.,e..Lv..,.- , --ng: 5-,,:q.g:p.5 .1-A: ya ments with to say that .ng to do. opened for affirmative r cut state- ive., :er, made a the affirm- ence by his our substi- :Bank. He serious and incisive and hile the de- was a sur- roud of our sult. and James valuable as- eir teams is THE WESTPORT HIGH SCHOOL HERALD 23 BOYS' TEAMS Girls' Negative Our negative met Northeast's affirmative at Manual, and as far as debate is concerned left nothing to be desired. Marian Guild started the ball rolling for the negative. She proved that to exclude the Japan- ese Would be unjustifiable. Her sincere manner placed her on intimate terms with the audience. Julie Pierce, captain of the team, was our sec- ond speaker, and her matter of fact manner of presenting one logical argument after another was irresistible. Ruth lVIcGinness, last W-estport speaker won unqualified approval by her eloquence and excel- lent delivery. The substitute plan she presented was given marked attention. She displayed the same skill in rebuttal. Strong, persuasive, she was a terror in very truth to the affirmative. Marian Guild's rebuttal was a triumph. She presented charts to prove her points, and her manner won instant favor. Her persuasive powers and sound logic made her speech peculiar- ly effective. Julie Pierce was last. She showed remarkable skill in answering the seven questions hurled at her by the negative. She showed herself a pow erful speaker, one that Westport may well be proud of. Three judges voted for Northeastp To a Soldier Far away from here I know, Now perhaps 'tis covered with snow, Lies so peaceful and so still, At the foot of a lonely hill, Just a little mound 0' earth, Where he found his all-his worth. Bravely, from his country sent, To the blood strewn fields he went, Taking with him cheery smiles Just to cheer up dreary whiles. O, I try hard not to, mourn Try to see the peace that's born, Try to see, to think, to feel, Life's still earnest and still real Even though he's gone forever, O, the length of that word never. ELINOR CURRY. I h I I . I If' v- - --g...f. ,,-4.-.yi -ge... , , rl.,