Western Washington University - Klipsun Yearbook (Bellingham, WA)

Page 22 text:

long, Nqtp sqnnuiatistoia sruq rscrqtk' lpcic M32 sr wsqzeq ciioit pk 1595 M92 9120 sr AGSL in Mpicp atnqeut ujcsqctan agobbcq blskiui unucjc biowotiou' cntucn nw sn co Q30 sr UJIUIZLLSUAG bisrcticca' . . I 9 ll 9 . . . . in Ntpicp tpcl. conlq ingncuce piLiU3 sruq mini or biotceaoral Lennie suq Wore Lqcztsrut to cqncstiou More sttcwbta pk atnqcuta to Esriu bozitiouz csulbnz' tot ppcispscq qtiulqui Lcgnjstiouz suq ckcumsl pdnor onqcta ou pk jrdnoi' 20 ztnqcuta atobbcq piqiug Lpia t-set suq obculk psriisiucq ieicucca suq otpct Estpc-:Ling blsccz rot atnqcuta MQLQ sqmska Uicnomcq EAQLAOUG Icucm LOL A6912 tpst psuq tubes Ln3pk Eswca' Iesrqcrapib cou- Vu cxswbyc M32 one or ppc psaic iutcieatz or wslc concic atnqcutaz pdnot' An example was one of the basic interests of male college students: liquor. Everyone knew for years that band trips, rugby games, leadership con- ferences and other gathering places for students were always mellowed by liquor. So students stopped hiding this fact and openly bargained for liberalized drinking regulations and eventual liquor outlets on campus. More relevant to education were attempts by students to gain positions in which they could influence hiring and firing of professors, tenure and promotion, curriculum and college administrative practices. 1969 was also a year in which student uleadersn stopped playing Uncle Tomn with administrators and faculty. There was a marked effort by all students concerned to honestly present their cases to outside groups without frills and without acting as lackeys for those in administrative positions. It was also the first year in which a wide spectrum of activity was noted in groups outside the student government. Groups from very conserva- tive to radical presented programs, lobbied for and against the college at the state legislature, demanded recognition and rights and gained thousands of signatures on petitions. There was also a healthy rejection of apathy by small groups of people who wanted to form service, academic, political, recreational or other clubs. They came out of their shells in reaction to centralization of money and programming in student government and in response to the offer of financial subsidization by student government. After a hectic year of extreme centralization and an unexpected surge of club activity, the Activities Commission, under Mike Botkin, became more workable and more people planned, participated in and promoted events. The woman on Westernis campus also bloomed in 1969. Many relevant and important official and unofficial jobs and offices were filled by women. The Dean of Women resigned and many women students ques- tioned if the position should continue. The clubs specifically for men and women were de-emphasized as such, although the women continued to have many more activities especially relevant to them, than did the men. The Student Academic Advisory Board made its mark in 1969 as the board of qualified, imaginative and knowledgeable students who could research, plan and execute curricular and generally academic reform.

Page 21 text:

PRESIDENT BOURA A SPEARS: .qila f1sibu51l is Jaui 3of1 asw 98' 569 was not just a freudian slip. baqqo3a a3r1obu3a Jsdi 1sov 3113 asw QGQI l969 was the year that students stopped playing games with adminis- 3ilods odT .n1932oW 3s v3Iuosl bus 21031313 trators and faculty at Wlestern. The abolition of game-playing came af- .31oii3 lo ZTBSY 5o1fl3 mods 133 ter about three years of effort. -131 baqsoaa HTSIZSW ,ZTSSY o91rI3 oaorh nl In those three years, Wlestern escaped rapidly from most confines of in rlloo 9d3 gnidiwaob H1193 is z',ai3r191sq oool loco parentisf' a term describing the collegeis action as a surrogate par- .1od3om gnidahuon 1o mo ent or nourishing mother. :Isws Is1or1og fs asw 519ri3 ,5mi3 aid3 gr1i1uCI During this time, there was a general awakening-at Western, as at other d3 gnilool 'z3f1obu3a orl3 logzoauqmso .Z.U U.S. campuseswof the students' feeling that the university was their in- guorh aid3 lo noiznsnxo lsoigol A .i1oi3u3i3a stitution. A logical extension of this thought is that if students can ac- 1ol znoiaiosb grlislsm ni 93sqioi31sq vllsm tually participate in making decisions for and in the name of the insti- : as bozu od uso v3i219vif1u 9d3 nod3 ,noi3u3 tution, then the university can be used as a platform from which students 4i3u3i3ar1i 15d3o ni m1olo1 dailqmoaos uso can accomplish reform in other institutions: educational, political, so- .o33 ,v1s11ilqio2ib ,Isis cial, disciplinary, etc. duob oI33il zsw o13rl3 ,88QI lo Ilsl 9ri3 vii By the fall of 1968, there was little doubt on campus that students were 01110291 oldslisvs gnisilim bus gniisool locating and utilizing available resources to gain and possibly usurp .boinab Snow v9d3 JI-al vod3 doidw 19woq power which they felt they were denied.

Page 23 text:

s E Their highlight of the year was obtaining voting student positions on the adj no znoiiiaoq 1 powerful Academic Council. i 1969 was definitely the year of the liberal and radical and less so for roi oz zeal bns I the moderate. Conservative ideas were not vogue, particularly because azusood vlisluoil a liberal slate of officers was elected starting with the executive offices aaoillo SVTIIJOSXS in Spring '68 and continuing each quarter with legislature elections. .anoiioala 311111 The Free University became the center and experimental location for 'iol noiisool Ismf educational reform. Starting as an outgrowth of the executive campaign ngisqmso 1'-Jviwo: in summer, 1968, it had more than 500 students by spring, ,69 and had bsrl bus QB' ,gui a full-time co-ordinator. Students hired for their co-ordinator a professor 'ioaaoloiq s ioisrtl who had been both chosen teacher of the year by students and not re- -91 Jon bns amal hired by Western in Spring '68. The Free University also became a meeting ground for interested citi- -iiio boiafnami it zens from Bellingham, the county, the college and local institutions. .anoiiuiiiani Isoo. Through people-to-people forums which started in winter, 1969, the srl! ,QBQI ,iamiv Free U. introduced many people to educational reform and ways for a s iol zvsw bus n real community of people to solve problems. Probably the most significant thing about 1969 was the rejection by stu- -me vd noiioaiar 1 dents of the bandaid effect of reforms. In other words, this meant that Jsrli Jnsom aid! , I9