University of Denver - Kynewisbok Yearbook (Denver, CO)

Page 15 text:

I Q S . ..- 1 1 . . j ls. i1ff, f'f,:'i T: fl? ' ' wh- ' vn..1'.1.-1f.'.:Jj' x, ' Q Aja-,-:f gs'-14-3 Q .ah ,4 1H+'!i?'-'s1'f'Z 47' ' 37' - fu-..f7 ' ' L J-Fei-L JST? :.,!,i Tj-af--,.g:y7::, 55251: 5121 '.'-' iff, 'fig f'1f v'-1 ' + ' '- 1 -0 .' -51: ':,1-g,p..g.F- 'g,. ': 4.:,.-':,41,1-f1' 5-fy--'-mi .V ' . QL ' V '-'3'3'fiQp.'if'5'I'T'j?m'A 3'5fI'1?5G'f':z.rc -- ' ,, ' 'Off f , 1 'f'f'1:'1f ,5'Q14gZ ''df'5'g,1:'ff , - . -iq H -- t ,, - , , .1 f. .'s'..i.3A,.,- -,Ray ' V - f 2- . . , . -'. , , ,'-V lf , '51 3 - -- ,sm 4192 3 - .. ' ' X ww ly -jf, p,g3:?f 1+ L.g3' h . 1- '--'if P'fQ,, .5 .I ,,. 0 N If. ..-. 'Si V ,- 1 SI--f., .. ,z,.,'5,, ,., a r, ,. Pg!- Q9 .' - ' 'fn'-f'f-.fi - -,av T ff Y- 1' g- 'Nuff -M ' '. '- 0' V Y ff-', QQ - Q- , ,- Y 'QLAU . 1-an q5,'1f4'i H.-rif,,:H. I 4 I ,a -- QDQAWU' ' 'ew2:-:5P4'5'- '- v?u.--,f3.'1,x-- -. ' -V f.-f.g,,- 3: 1 - g 'ff f f, 3 .,..' t , g9ZfQ:f,f-'tifg'3 - ff' Q' . Wag '-'f l-YL'i',I --4. a fr, A?e35,- nf fs, n 4, v ,,I.--ohne. . vs!! 4, Qjfh 11 j'Hj:-,-4 V , .1-f 1 , Ollfohm N AMES ,X ...- . .4 , Q., if -gf X rife V 9-J 'Q ' '1,'f'!y-'KP -'I -'fs .X 4 1 fa- '11, TS 103, ,' b 'fvzfi'-: 1,41 jg 537,5- 1 I QCTI ITV Q

Page 17 text:

j I I Curricular Administration Inner Sanetums . . . Feet ofthe Masters . . Pedagogy under the Microscope Hrs IS about the University's administrators. It is a deli- cate subject. In casting about us for a method of presentation of the facts in regard to the work and accomplishments of the professors, we see two formulae at our dis- posal. We might on the one hand assume a highly complimentary manner in our sum- mary, or we might become severely critical or devastatingly sarcastic. Our choice has been neither of these extremes. We are not foolish enough to use the latter. entirely nor desirous of apple polishing to employ the former solely. With this introduction we may delve into the contents of the section. The University of Denver has followed the lead of its brother in- stitutions of higher book-l'arnin' inan attempt to make its curriculum attractive to prep school graduates, who are usually more interested in cheering sections than laboratory sections, and, further, to see that everyone connected with the University fits in the machine, all cooperating to make the four-year course pleasant, not too hard, and undisturbed by hot-headed editors, oat-sowing sophomores and perennial Hunkers. The administrative faculty carries these and other important functions which govern both purposeful teacher and aimless undergraduate. They sit on such august bodies as the Admin- istrative Committee, Assembly Committee, Ath- letic Committee, and Social Committee. They advise as to courses, gym credit, tuition dilemmas, and majors. Most of them move in remote exclusive circles, some of them bring cheer or despair to the student. At the top of the heap is the rotund and genial Chancellor Frederick M. Hunter. Upon him falls the worrisome task of footing the bills, coordinating the activities of the various schools, and directing the general policy of per- petuating and dignifying the institution. Chan- cellor Hunter has managed to keep the torch of learning ' going full blast at the University of Denver despite a greatly reduced budget. Al- though the general conception of a head of a University sees a man who applies a wet blan- ket to new ideas and innovations, Dr. Hunter has violated this old conception by proving most modern. He can be counted upon to sup- port almost anything inthe way of extra-curric- ular activities with enthusiasm. wo YEARS' ago, student leaders decided to clarify the boundaries of student govern- ment. Three realms were discovered: the realm of policy controlled entirely by the administra- tion, second, that area in which the faculty and students took joint command, and the realm where the undergraduate governed alorie. To- day there are still three realms but of different character: one in which the administration