University of Virginia Law School - Barrister Yearbook (Charlottesville, VA)

Page 99 text:

Irving L. Faught. .. .. .. .. .... . . . . .. . Editor-in-Chief MANAGING BOARD Edward M. Holland . . . . . . . . . . . . . Advertising Manager George J- Cannon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business Manager Dexter Edward Martin . . ., . . . Assistant Business Manager Edgar Eugene Williams . . . . . . . . . . Circulation Manager EDT. I'ORIAL BOARD Bernard J. Long, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Activities Editor David L. Smith...................... Classes Editor James V. Dunba', Jr. Faculty Editor David W. Statrn.... . . . . . .. Photography Editor Thomas A: P'.ayer, Jr...............,....;. Art Editor Frank J- P3'11i31'0,11'. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . Layout Editor ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS David L Smith James V. Dunbar, Jr. Edward M. Holland Irving L. Faught 95

Page 98 text:

imp garrister, 31m. First row: Frank J. Pagliaro, Jr. , Dexter E. Martin, Irving Lee Faught, David L. Smith, Georgerj. Cannon. Second row: Bernard J. Long, Jr., David W. Staton, Thomas A. Player, In, Edward M. Holland, James V. Dunbar. The Barrister is de vot ed to an exposition of every phase of Law School activity. It devotes sections to the faculty, classes, organizations and a c t i v i ti e 5, legal fraternities, and intramural athletics. The emphasis is equallydivided betweenthe formal and candid. Through this medium an attempt is made to preserve current life in the Law School for the future. The Barrister was originally begun as a private pro- ject of the now defunct Sigma Nu Phi Legal Fraternity as a result of a suggestion by Dean Ribble. The second issue of the book was published by a staff composed of volun- teers. Presently the Barri ster operates as a non-stock 94 corporation and its membership is open to any student desiring to work on it. This is the tenth year of publi- cation. . The Barrister derive s revenue from three sources: subscriptions from students; contributions from Law School organizations and fratemities: and outside advertising. Of these, the student subscriptions by far make up the greatest part of the Barrister's income. The Barrister is devoted to each and every student and without the sup- port of the studentbody, publication would be impossible. We also wish to express our appreciation to our faculty advisor, Professor A. J. G. Priest.

Page 100 text:

First row: Pearsall, Clemens, Hellman, Allen, Warden, Crowley, Kemper, Lawson. Second row: Kirby, Regan, Campfield,Carpenter, Sikora, Graziano, Patrick, Miller, Ritter. Third row: Beams, Kehl, Morris, Long, Holt, Warner, Porter, Smith, Kahn, Hawk. Fourth row: In the 1964-65 academic year, the Virginia Lgv 32- View 0 o m pi e te d its fiftieth anniversary volume and entered upon its second half-century of legal scholar- ship. The anniversary volume, known in come circles as the golden egg, featured four series of articles - on labor law, antitrust law, international law, and the administrative regulation of the transportation industry. Designed to provide a bro adly based analys's of legal problems of current interest, the series included articles by business and labor leaders, economists and public officials as well as practicing attorneys and professors. Almost half of the 1600 pages that the Review pub- lished annually are written by students on the Editorial Board. In addition to the customary notes and de- cisions two other forms of work were utilized this ye ar. The casenote, and extended discussion of an important legal area centered around one significant case, was used increasingly in the fifti eth and fifty-first volumes. In additon, the later issues of the fiftieth volume introduced a whollynew addition to the Review's format, the student comment, a piece shorter than the note which emphasizes the writer's point of view to a greater extent than is possible in the decision. Besides the research and writing of these sections, the fifty members of the Editorial Board also do detailed analysis and authenti- cation of the work of the guest contributors. Candidates Collins, Ellington, Sanderlin, Jenkins, Frierson. Fifth row: Fink, Simpson, Schlaugh, Towell, Cook, Patterson, Clinger, Mentz, Heiner. Sixth row: Towell, Watson, Zink, Mandamus, Shoemaker, Ide, Hopkins. for Editorial Board positions are chosen by class standing in the spring of the first and the fall of the second year. Election is based on work subm itted to the Managing Board of the Review during a thorough and extensive try- out program. The Business Board is responsible for the financial operations of the Review,including soliciting advertising and maintaining the circulation, along with a host 0 other functions necessary to keep the Review operating smoothly. The members of the Business Board, who per- form these tasks with the indispensible assistance of Mrs Mary Adams, the Review's secretary, are elected afte a tryout in the fall of the second year. Extracurricularly, the Review gridders humbled th primordial gladiators hired to represent the Ev Weekly in the annual Keg Bowl, to the great delight of all those aspiring to justice, virtue and clean living. tSee Warden; The Last Guffawq In a post season game, the Review was held to a tie by the V.L. R.G. staff, which exploited its numerical advantage to wear down the harried Review forces. In December, the Review was host to the faculty former Editors, and their wives at the annual forma banquet at which Professor Mortimer M. Caplin, unti recently Commissioner of Internal Revenue, delivere- the principal address.