University of Toronto Engineering Society - Skule Yearbook (Toronto, Ontario Canada)

Page 31 text:

LACROSSE , I This year was a bit of a disappointment for the Engineering lacrosse team. With the loss of three of the senior players, the manpower situation was less than ideal. The team played well but was unable to equal last year’s record. The loss of a few close games to the top teams gives the team promise for next year. With the return of the veteran players and the hopeful addition of new recruits, the Engineering lacrosse team hopes to improve its record next season. Steve Curry; Barg Gogarth; Ed Konyem; Dave Paradi; Joseph Paradi; Rob Patterson; Jim Red- ford; Peter Reilly; Bill Wignall. I 27

Page 30 text:

RUGBY In early September, the Engineering rugby team began its training; training that would bring us victory against every team we met. The regular season left us with a mighty record of five wins and one loss. Into the playoffs we marched! The semi- final game was a cake-walk, it was on to the finals against the meds, the only team which had defeated us. The game was close, rallying back and forth and back and forth. Finally the meds crumbled under our powerful forwards and talented backs giving us the win and the coveted Nan- cekill Cup. The ’84 rugby season was a tremendous success! The engineers won both the third annual Queen’s Tournament and the U of T Championship. Thanks to all players, especially the MVP’s Glyn Jones and Paul Vaarsi. Rob Abernathy; Mike Allen; John Blyz- niak; Bob Boothby; Joe Chiang; Brent Corkum; Bruce Dow; Greg Dow; Dan Ger- bec; Glyn Jones; Mike Jones; Mario Mar- tins; Mike Ogrvzio: John Phypher; Mark Thompson; Paul Vaarsi Peter Watler; Rod Williams. 26

Page 32 text:

AQUATICS This year’s aquatics program consisted basicaiiy of the Men’s First Division Waterpolo Team, the Men’s Third Division Water- polo Team and the Swim Meet. The participation at the Swim Meet was not particularly in- spiring, but an extraordinary effort was put forth by those who did show up, doubling up as they did for all events. They placed quite well relative to other teams and we hope for a stronger turnout in future. Both the first and third division waterpolo teams had their problems during the course of the season. The teams both had members who put forth a fine ef- fort, but somehow luck wasn’t with us this year. Praise goes to those who regularly came out to support and swim in the teams.