University of Santa Clara - Redwood Yearbook (Santa Clara, CA)

Page 15 text:

THE REDWOOD grant this when the Council General was not sitting, as it happened at that time. But the Council General had re- fused their consent a few days previ- ous, and Petion knew that if he gave his permission he would be called to account, while on the other hand, if he did not, he would lose his popularity with the people. So he called together the administrators of the affected sec- tions, and the commanders of the na- tional guards of those sections, and shifted the responsibility on them. He saw his way out by letting the national guards accompany the people to pre- serve order, and issued orders to that effect. But the Directory of the de- partment refused its sanction, and is- sued contrary orders. When the peo- ple assembled on the morning of the 20th, the national guard commanders did not know what to do, and so events were left to shape themselves. The people marched to the Assembly and presented their petition through Santerre, and then defiled through the hall to intimidate the Assembly by a show of force. There was no intention to break into the Tuilleries, until the crush became so great that it was ne- cessary to open the gates to relieve it. The people wandered through the gar- dens, and then animated by some hid- den influence, demanded to see the King. They defiled through the palace of the Tuilleries, and only the coolness of the King saved him from bodily harm, though he was abundantly in- sulted. The brewer, Santerre, hearing of the turn of events, hurried to the side of the queen and protected her from the insults of the mob. But, on the whole, there was no intention on the part of the mob to injure any one on that day. At length the people dis- persed, and Paris settled down once more. The Directory investigated the part played by Petion in the rising, and after hearing the evidence, suspended the Mayor. The Assembly, on hearing of this, and even after the King said he would sustain it, voted that by its own authority, this suspension was null and void. Thus the authority of the Directory was done away with. Even the King had to sign the de- cree. This demonstration showed the pow- er of the mobs, and the leaders of the factions took notice of it, intending to make good use of it later. The King had vetoed a measure pro- viding for the safety of the Assembly by having a camp of Pederes, or sol- diers of the Federation, just outside of the city. The measure had been passed over the King ' s veto, and the camp had been established. The crisis was fast drawing near. The King tried to prevent the coming of the Federes ; the Girondins hoped to excite their patriotism; while the Ja- cobins made preparations for enter- taining them. The sight of many of the Federes about the streets caused many young men to join them. Sympathy with the King was fast disappearing.

Page 14 text:

THE REDWOOD rat said that it was the people who would suffer, and Robespierre claimed that it was unnecessary. It is here that the great enmity between the Jacob- ins and the Girondins began. Prior to this time they had been occupying the same club, but now the Girondins es- tablished their own. The King was in a difficult position. If he refused to sign the war-bill, he would be accused of treachery. If he did sign it, he would be declaring war against the very nations from which he had secretly asked aid. A long report by Dumouriez to the Assembly, in which he showed the ne- cessity for war, Avon them over to the Girondins, and the bill was passed in spite of the Jacobins. The failure of the King to sign the two measures against the Emigres, and against the Priests, led to the expul- sion of the Girondist ministers from the cabinet, on the suggestion of Du- mouriez, who now assumed the power of prime minister, which he had covet- ed ever since he had entered the minis- try. The Girondists were furious at Dumouriez ' supposed treachery, but when he tried to get the King to sign the two decrees and thereby make his position secure, the King refused. This upset all his plans and the only thing for him to do was to resign, which he did. One will naturally inquire what all this has to do with the Commune of Pa- ris. A few words will suffice to make clear the whole situation. The Com- mune of Paris, of which Bailly had been Mayor until he resigned, and his place taken by Petion, was answerable to the Department of the Seine, of which Due de la Rochefoucauld was the head. The dismissal of the mem- bers of the Girondin party from the ministry inflamed the populace, but not in the same degree as the dismissal of Neckar had, at the beginning of the Revolution. Neckar ' s dismissal was the signal for armed insurrections and riots, while Roland ' s and that of the other Girondists, was discussed heated- ly in the sectional clubs, where the leaders declared that nothing but the capture of the Tuilleries would satisfy them. But they were not qui te right. The movement of June 20th did not have such an ending. June 20th, the date of the first insurrection of what is known as the Paris Commune, stands apart from other days of the Revolu- tion, inasmuch as it was one of the very few on which, in a great popular dis- turbance, there was no blood shed. In this disturbance of June 20th none of the important leaders of the different parties had a direct hand. It was simply an attempt by the peo- ple of Paris, the mob, to influence the King to recall his late ministers, their favorites. Petion, the Mayor of the Commune, was in a critical position. The leaders of the movement, Santerre, the brewer, St. Huruge, and Legendre the butcher, wished some color of au- thority for it. Petion had power to

Page 16 text:

THE REDWOOD The volunteers were murmuring in the camps that they would not leave for war, until they knew that the traitors behind them would not take advantage of their absence. The Mayor was not trying to suppress insurrection, but was actually encouraging it; and the National Guards, disgusted with their officers, did not take any steps to pre- vent it. Then came the manifesto of the Duke of Brunswick, the instrument which finally sealed the fate of the King. This manifesto called upon the French people to be loyal to their King, and threatened all who rebelled, with the rigours of war. This tended to inflame the minds of the Parisian populace, and to create greater suspicion of the King ' s fidelity to his people. The Ja- cobin leaders, such as Marat, Robe- spierre, Danton, and Camille Desmou- lins, harangued the mobs and incited them to outbursts. These, with others, drawn from the battalion of the Fe- deres, formed an insurrectionary Direc- tory and were the chief instigators of the riots. From now on, the influence of the Jacobins can be clearly seen on the Commune. The Directory knew that many of the Sections of Paris were friendly to the deposition of the King ; they them- selves thought that there would be no end of strife unless the King was de- throned. Towards the end of July those Sections which favored dethrone- ment met at the Hotel de Ville under the sanction of Petion. There were at this time only forty- eight Sections still in existence out of the sixty original. Of these, twenty- eight were in favor of dethronement. Knowing that only a part of Paris ad- hered to the cause, the Jacobins saw the necessity of furthering some mea- sure calculated to give them stronger support. Each Section, that is, each of the original sixty, had a battalion of national guards. But when the Sec- tions were diminished, these battalions were not. This left many free battal- ions, the majority of which were in fa- vor of the bourgeois. The Jacobins, to further their ends, had a decree passed, that since France was at war, no discrimination was to be made as to who were eligible to en- ter the national guard. The bourgeois battalions refused to let the rabble join them, with the result, as the Jacobins had forseen, that they joined the bat- talions of the disturbed Sections, thus recruiting them to a stronger number than those of the bourgeois. On August 3 the first tremors of the coming storm were heard. Petion, at the head of the Sections proceeded to the Assembly with a petition demand- ing the overthrow of the King. The Assembly was divided. They hesitated. On the sixth, the Federes repeated the demand. But the Assembly resolved by vote not to arrest, nor bring to trial the King. When the Sections heard that their demands were refused, the smoldering embers burst into flame,