University of Santa Clara - Redwood Yearbook (Santa Clara, CA)

Page 10 text:

ARE THE DARK AGES JUSTLY SO-CALLED? HE Middle, or Dark Ages are the most abused and least deserv- ing of the abuse of all periods of history. On ac- count of the great obstacles in the path of its ad- vancement, no other epoch merits more sympathy for its failures, and more ad- miration for its triumphs. It is not a doubtful assertion that the mediaeval times have received less sympathy and more intolerance, less admiration and more denunciation, than ages unworthy of a place beside them. Historians seem to delight immense- ly in roundly scoring this period. If they are not guilty of plain misstate- ments they minimize its good qualities, and its defects are proclaimed loud and long, thereby producing an unjust impression. A certain historian re- marks in the first pages of a volume of the Middle Ages, that the Church was in spite of her defects, a powerful force for the good during the mediaeval times, but he refrains from mentioning few things save her faults, which he himself acknowledged as unusual and exceptional. Her effects on the ad- vancement of civilization, a topic of great importance, is unnoticed. It has become so customary to ascribe almost any and every desirable quality to mediaeval times, that until recently little independent research to verify statements concerning them was con- sidered necessary. This continued slander against the Middle Ages has powerfully affected the popular con- ception concerning them. At present, they are very lowly esteemed by many people who know nothing definite about them, having adopted their opinion merely because it was the current one. But intelligent and sympathetic study of mediaeval times does and is bringing more favor upon them. The Dark Ages are Dark only to those who are igno- rant of them. In what way shall we proceed to judge the Middle Ages? Surely we shall not examine them and discover- ing them inferior in civilization to our age, declare them unenlightened? This is plainly unfair. The twentieth cen- tury has, over and above what it has achieved of itself, a rich legacy from all foregoing time. Yet we find many historians comparing modern and mediaeval times, apparently without realizing the injustice of such a com- parison. Rather we should consider the amount of progress an age has

Page 9 text:

Entered Dec. 18, 1902, at Santa Clara. Cal., as second-class matter, under Act of Congress of March 3, 1879 VOL. XV SANTA CLARA, CAL., OCTOBER, 1915 No. 1 TKe Most Reverend Edward J. Hanna, ArcKtisKop of San Francisco Prince of the Cnurcn, to tnee, all nail ! TKine apostolic reign be long. Ana, all triumphant over wrong, Thy banner of our faith prevail ! Thy gifts we cherish, prize thy fame, We know the tablets thou has wrought, Thy potent voice, thy master thought, The virtues that enwreathe thy name. Thy precepts make for war ' s surcease ; Aye, more— a Christ-like brotherhood, Where mortals vie in doing good, While world-wide rings the note of Peace. May Truth and Love Divine prevail, A climax of thy gracious sway ! Our hearts a loyal homage pay ! Prince of the Church, to thee, all hail ! CHAS. D. SOUTH

Page 11 text:

THE REDWOOD made, how much it has risen aboA e the plane on which it started. It would be an absurdity to put one foot racer fifty yards behind another in a race and because the latter finished far in front of his opponent, to declare the handicapped one a very poor runner, having been beaten by about fifty yards. This is a parallel case of what is frequently done when modern and mediaeval civilization are compared. Let us then consider how great a dis- tance the Middle Ages have advanced and not to where their advance has carried them. Ruskin says that in determining the progress of a nation, or an epoch in his- tory, we should examine its book of Deeds, its book of Arts and its book of Words. I shall first turn over a few leaves of the book of Deeds and show you some of the great mediaeval achievements. Then I will tell of the artistic triumphs and lastly give a glimpse of its literature. But first it would be advisable to de- termine the period known as the Mid- dle Ages ; this cannot be done satisfac- torily to all, for historians some times confine the name Dark Ages to the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth centuries, others consider the Tenth, Eleventh and Twelfth Dark, but most historians and nearly all others, use Dark Ages and Middle Ages as synonyms. It is in the latter sense that I will take it. The opinion of most historians is that the fall of the Roman Empire in the West, 476 A. D. ushers in the Middle Ages and that they end approximately with the fall of Constantinople, 1453 A. D. Their beginning was not auspicious. About that time barbaric tribes were traversing Europe, at intervals of a score or less years, leaving a wake of slaughter and destruction. Italy was the favorite stamping ground. Rome, during a period of twenty years, fell booty to these plunderers no less than five times. For nearly two hundred years complete peace was unknown to Europe. Agriculture, arts and indus- tries could not be prosecuted exten- sively, nor with the proper care. But the period was not unfruitful. Out of the chaos the modern nations slowly crystallized. The roaming tribes set- tled down and accustomed themselves to the pursuits of peace. As she had conquered Rome, the Church set about to conquer Rome ' s conquerors and the whole of Europe, also. It is an absurdity to say that period which saw Europe transformed from a land inhabited by ruthless pagans into the abode of Christians, was Dark. What more valuable con- tribution to civilization could have been made than the real truth? What more precious gift could have been presented to men, than the knowledge of God and their eternal destiny? Christianity was the greatest force in subduing the barbarous inhabitants of Europe. Their ideals were drawn from and their conducts influenced by the teachings of Christ. At the beginning of the work, zeal- ous and holy men were dispatched into the wilderness. There, by preaching