University of North Carolina Greensboro - Pine Needles Yearbook (Greensboro, NC)

Page 11 text:

Opening — 7

Page 10 text:

1 ot in the ninety-one-year history of this school has there been an event to compare with the magnitude and celebration UNC-G ' s first Homecoming. For a university sadly lacking in traditions around which students can rally, the advent of Homecoming was indeed a blessing. It was the unanimous opinion of the five thousand Spartan fans gathered at Jamieson Stadium that this was the breath needed to resuscitate the fainting spirit of UNC-G. Since the addition of men to the campus in 1964 the changes they have made are vital to the rise of col- legiate spirit. This was never as evi- dent as on the night of October 28, 1982. Thanks to seventeen young men and their coaches, UNC-G celebrated its first Homecoming game and festivities. In view of the wildly enthusiastic response from the crowds it it may seem unbelievable that there had been stiff opposition to the proposed idea of electing a homecoming queen. The purpose of the event was to foster spirit and encourage unity of students, faculty, and administration traditional to so many universities. Whereas it took an individual to try defeating the proposal, another in- dividual led the fight to create and establish the badly needed tradition. Early in October Student Senate passed a resolution condemning the selection of a homecoming queen calling the event discriminatory and debasing. The resolution, co- authored by the Student Govern- ment Vice President and a senator, stated that the university and its stu- The Birth, Breath, and Blessing of Homecoming by MARKS LANE dent orgnizations had a policy of non-discrimination based on dif- ferences such as sex and race. The authors felt the election was therefore demeaning to any woman involved because it placed emphasis on physical characteristics. Further- more, they insisted the election would be detrimental to race rela- tions at UNC-G. The voice of the majority, Randy McGuire, defended the objectives of the contest. As Vice President of EUC Council and coordinator of the contest, he made it clear that the desire of the Council was to ensure equal representation for all student organizations. McQuire maintained that the nomination process had covered all organizations without regard to race and as democratically as possible. McGuire nobly continued with his plans for the contest despite the resolutions and ramifications. He and the Council held the view that the students were desperately searching for something around which to rally. Undoubtedly, a homecoming queen crowned at the soccer match against Notre Dame would appeal to the masses and ensure a renewed interest in the rise of tradition at UNC-G. And rally they did! An hour before the start of the soccer match the crowds flowed into the stadium. The turnout and show of support was unequaled by any event in the school ' s History. At 7 p.m. six finalists in the homecoming queen contest were escorted onto the field. Each contestant had the distinction of being a member of the first homecoming court at UNC-G. At 7:05 the crowd roared as the crown was placed on the head of one of the most delightful and distinguished personalities in recent UNC-G memories. Elizabeth Skoal Ford, representing Tau Kappa Ep- silon fraternity, captured the limelight as the first homecoming queen in the school ' s ninety-one-year history. Escorted by TKE Joey Katzenstein, she represented a triumph for the EUC Council and a milestone in the development and preservation of true American col- legiate tradition. At 7:30 all attention was focused on the Spartans as they took control of the ball and continued to possess it most of the first half. They fired shot after shot to succeed only with a penalty kick. A very grueling second half brought only one goal for the Irish and excitement soared as regulation time ended with a tie. Even a double overtime did not affect the Spartans ' performance. The Irish proved their luck in an eventual vic- tory: the Spartans proved their strength. In a year when blessings were counted slowly and traditions saw slow, sometimes unstable beginnings, we must not fail to acknowledge the true gift which was given our school. Though we lost the game, we won a tradition to be shared by future students, faculty, and ad. inistra- tion. We can be proud that wt par- ticipated in the birth, breath, and blessing of Homecoming. 6 — Opening

Page 12 text:

From Mclver to Moran by DOROTHY F. CLARK J. he University of North CaroHna at Greensboro was established by legislative enactment on February 18, 1891, and opened on October 5, 1892 with a student body of 22.3 and a faculty of 15. The City of Greensboro, situated near the geographical center of the state, was selected for the loca- tion of the new institution. Its citizens voted bonds to the sum of $30,000 for the erection of the first buildings, and the original ten-acre site was given by R.S. Pullen and R.T. Gray. The University was known first as the State Normal and Industrial Col- lege (1892-1919), later as the North Carolina College for Women (1919- 19311, and as the Woman ' s College of the University of North Carolina (1932-1963). It came into being as a direct result of a crusade made by Charles Duncan Mclver in behalf of the education of women. Other pioneers in public school education — notably, Charles B. Aycock, Edwin A. Alderman, and James Y. Joyner — came to Dr. Mclver ' s assistance; but to him, more than any other individual, the University owes its foundation. During the years 1932-1963, the University known as the Woman ' s College of the University of North Carolina was one of the three bran- ches of the consolidated University of North Carolina. In 1962, the Board of Trustees recommended that the Greensboro campus become coeduca- tional in the fall of 1964. By act of the General Assembly in the spring of 1963, the name of the institution was changed to the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. The crusader for founding the in- stitution, Charles Duncan Mclver, served as its first president. In 1906, following the death of Dr. Mclver, Dr. Julius I. Foust became president and served until 1934 when he retired from active service. In 1934, Dr. Walter Clinton Jackson, who had served as teacher and vice president, was elected head of the institution with the title of Dean of Administra- tion. By act of the Board of Trustees in 1945, the title of the head of the in- stitution was changed to Chancellor. Dr. Jackson, who retired in 19.50, was succeeded by Dr. Edward Kidder Graham. After Dr. Graham ' s resigna- tion in 1956, Dr. W. W. Pierson, Jr., served as Acting Chancellor until Ju- ly 1, 1957, when Dr. Gordon W. Blackwell became Chancellor. Dr. Pierson returned to serve again as Acting Chancellor in September, 1960, after the resignation of Dr. Blackwell. Dr. Otis Singletary became Chancellor July 1, 1961. Dur- ing the period of November, 1964, to February, 1966 while Dr. Singletary was on leave of absence. Dr. James S. Ferguson served as Acting Chancellor until his resignation on November 1, 1966. Dr. Ferguson again served as Acting Chancellor and was appointed Chancellor on January 9, 1967. Dr. Ferguson served until his retirement to return to teaching in the summer of 1979, when Dr. William E. Moran became Chancellor. The University of North Carolina at Greensboro entered a new era when it became a coeducational university in the fall of 1964. It assumed a greater role as a part of the public education system of the State of North Carolina. As a state institu- tion it desires to be of the greatest possible service to the people of North Carolina, and its advantages are open to all on similar terms without regard to race, color, or na- tional origin. During its first seven decades, the institution ' s mission was to prepare women, primarily undergraduates, for the most effective living of that day. Today the goal — effective liv- ing — remains the same but its scope has been greatly expanded. UNC-G now offers men and women over 150 graduate and undergraduate programs. It provides opportunities to apply classroom learning to real-life situations through internships and practicums. It also offers students the chance to tailor-make their own programs of study based on individual needs and goals. Although contemporary in its educational program, UNC-G is also realistic. In its effort to prepare graduates for effective living, it has built into its program the flexibility needed to meet the rapidly changing needs of society. UNC-G, therefore, will remain a university in transition, not satisfied with yesterday or today, but always looking toward tomorrow. 8 — Opening