University of Michigan Law School - Quad Yearbook (Ann Arbor, MI)

Page 81 text:

The nren engaged in educational work and the more prominent nienibers of the bench and the bar during the revolutionary period foresaw the coming change and felt that some more suitable provi- sion should be made for the teaching of the law as a science. As a result the schools of law to which We have referred were under- taken. These schools and those which soon followed them have had an experience of nearly one hundred yearsf During this time they have met with no little antagonism from every direction. It is only within the past fifteen years that the bench and the bar have been united in the idea that study in a -law school is any improvement upon colonial methods of instruction. Perhaps it is not, but certain it is that there is no such thing as scientific legal education in the law office of to-day. There is no disagreement in the legal profession on this subject. ' In Q JEROME C. KNOWLTON.

Page 80 text:

as they are now. The ofhce was not so 'much a machine. The lawyer daily conversed with and quizzed the young law Student in his ofhce. Frequently there were large numbers reading law in the game ofhce, and an advocate of experience frequently had time to lecture in a conversational but impressive way to the young men reading with him. A most important historic example of this practice is found in the life of Seth P. Staple, who iS held SOfI1CWh3'E responsible for the organization of the Y-H16 Law SChOO1- H9 W3S a very prominent lawyer of New Haven from I8oo to 1824, and was a graduate of the 'Class of 1797 at Yale. His scholarly mind and his successes at the bar attracted young men to him, and his office was nlled with students reading law under his direction. He lectured to them and conversed with them about the subjects they were reading. He was after a time compelled to employ an assistant instructor. For many years his office was the primitive law school of New Haven. This example is a fair type in legal education during the colonial and revolutionary period and for many years thereafter. The six men appointed by President Washington, to form the first Supreme Court of the United States, were graduates of a law office, none had attended an American law school, two had studied at the Temple. The lawyers who appeared before them had acquired their knowledge with no better advantages. True itisi that there are few men to-day who can equal those who interpreted and applied .the Constitution of our country in its early history. It is not strange that many men still think that study in a law office is the best method of acquiring a legal education. An impres- sion firmly fixed is not easily displaced. But conditions have changed. The active lawyer is too busy to be troubled by students in his ofhce, and an idle lawyer is not worth associating with. The press of litigation leaves no time to ask or answer questions regarding fundamental principles. How many able practitioners at the bar can do now what Mr. Staples did in New Haven in r8ooiP At the- present time a student in a law office is nothing more than a lawyer's clerk. His clerical work is appreciated and sometimes paid for. There rs, however, no one there willing to im-part instruction. 0CC3Si0H3HY SUSSCSUOHS are given, but there is the inquiring mind along scientific lines, np one to point out the elements of the science of jurisprudence, no one 150 C311 aftgntiou to the radical distinction between a principle and 3 Case no hand to lead

Page 82 text:

JOHN W. CHAMPLIN