University of Massachusetts Boston - Beacon Yearbook (Boston, MA)

Page 26 text:

by 56 million, accelerating the combination of the city's only two schools of higher learning. Late August, 1981, students were notified by mail that classes would start later that fall, due to the merger. Yet, in spite of this supposed instant merger, classes were held at Boston State throughout the '81-'82 school year. One Boston State student, again nameless, recounts the typical merger story. Most teachers lost faith In my Sociology class the professor left for another school mid-semester, and there was no one to fill-in. This same student also worked for the Management Department. There, the Department Head had left for a job at an Alabama university. Evidently, the UMassfBoston people did not check on Boston State or respond to its problems. The work-study student remembers that he fthe Department Headj was only in town one day a week. I graded papers, signed incompletes He didn't care, he was already gone I think I filled out most the graduation forms for Management degrees that year. No one else seemed to it was so sloppy. So much equipment and books were stolen. People felt cheated And unfair it would continue. That Fall semester, 1981, three hundred UMassfBoston part-time faculty were laid off, and close to one hundred full-time from Boston State. UMassfBoston only accepted professors from its sister-school with PHDs, regardless of work experience, teaching record, or terminal degree. In true exhibition of legislative concern for public higher education, every classified or unionized State worker was retained. Teachers of some note were allowed to wash away, while every single 22 cafeteria worker was imported to the Harbor to sling another helping from the Board of Regents. In 1984, the merger remains a messy digestion. It was not so much the action itself as the way they brought it about, commented one former Boston Stater. Others maintain that the fusion was harmful, forcing two different types of students together, limiting the programs of one group - the Staters. Regardless, merger troubles have not yet subsided. Three years later, new requirements for transferred Boston Staters slow down their graduation, others find their records have been misplaced, misread, or lost in the shuffle to UMassfBoston. And there are still deeper conflicts for some former Boston State people, conflicts of spirit. Professor William Squires remembers, The kids from 'Bo State' were renegades from their parents. They were losers and they had the brains and the ability and they didn't want to follow their father's foot steps going to Boston College I'd say eighty per cent of the faculty knew that was the type of kid, and they said, 'you know, we're going to see how far this kid can really go.' And they were amazed. When asked how that spirit had transferred to UMassfBoston and the Harbor Campus, Squires responded, Not at all. MassfBoston. That's the shorthand of it all, right there in its title. I mean, doesn't that X in the middle of the school name bother anyone? That X indicates UMassfBoston's isolation from Boston. That's geographically as well as psychologically. That's ironic, considering the University's student body consists of a fair cross section of the city's population. But Boston caters to the imports, those students paying 510,000 a year to attend the other schools. This is, after all, America, and by nature the more expensive product is granted preferential allowances. Take B.U., and recently Simmons College. Both are publicly fearful of UMass!Boston's cut-rate tuition. B.U. has reportedly been behind an Anti-UMassfBoston campaign from the start, becoming involved in the no publicity first day of classes as discussed here earlier. But further than little media skirmishes, these schools have regularly opposed Fine Arts, Library Science, and Engineering courses at UMassfBoston, actually stopping these classes from being offered at a public school in Boston. Deals have been struck between the State Board of Regents of Higher Education and the private foes of UMassfBoston. As this Board consists of mainly private school representatives, including B.U., and UMass-Amherst's nonsupportive Chancellor these deals are like shaking one's own hand - in favor of the privates. It is not difficult, for instance, to have the Board prohibit UMassfBoston from offering an Engineering Degree Program. UMassfBoston Engineering majors receive two years' courses at the Harbor Campus, but must then transfer to a private university to finish their degree. The State, because UMassfBoston cannot offer this degree, picks up the tab, paying for the ten times higher private school rate. And this does more than cost UMassfBoston needed funding. This engineering restriction appears to the world as an inadequacy of UMassfBoston, rendering it not as good as

Page 25 text:

A looking glass self of UMass gives that we are an untouted University in Boston and we have to prove ourselves to other schools As a University our image fails in that we don't see ourselves in the world as we know we are. Reasons for this seeming self consciousness are recurring, reverberating still from UMassfBoston's beginnings at Columbia Point. To initiate this S130 million project, january 28, 1974, 5700 students arrived and attended classes. Rather spare, even for a public school. But this unheralded first day was a message, an exhibition of the powers in Boston granted to private schools. These imitation Ivy Leaguers - none of the complaining schools were among the city's best - feared the growing University's cut-rate tuition. They attempted to keep UMassfBoston invisible, veiled in negative press. They did not want their students migrating from the more expensive private schools. They tried to hide the University. And this, of course, is absurd: How do you camaflague 12,000 or so low - income and minority students? Put them on a peninsula in Dorchester. And to this day in 1984, there is no sign anywhere near the buildings at all, announcing The University of Massachusetts at Boston. One anonymous Vice Chancellor jokes that out-of-state friends once drove by the University and asked if it wasn't dangerous to have a prison so close to the highway. UMassfBoston has an image problem. And this complex extends well inside the school as well. From the glass-paneled, computer- terminaled Library Archives, visions of history being rewritten surface as one finds virtually no written history, newsclips - nothing on the University heritage. Evidently, UMassfBoston has not initiated preserving much sense of its history, good or bad. Very little, and cautious at best, oral tradition exists as well. Most faculty, students, and administration requested not to be quoted in this article. One faculty member went so far as to say he never wantfedj to be on record as ever having said anything regarding this university. Another, upon hearing of this reporter's intentions to discuss UMassfBoston with Boston University chieftan john Silber, ranted, Don't ask him iSilberj how B.U. sees UMass. He would love that a picture in their newspaper, front page. 'UMass Man Asks B.U. ' Be it former bad press, previous pressure from the privates, or just plain youth, UMassfBoston is easily intimidated outside its own Harbor territory. Inside, UMB knows its own strengths. The biggest news with this school has always been the quality of education made available to the general public - at a price most anyone, with financial aid readily available, could afford. Most faculty members hold Ivy League PHDs, twenty-five per cent from Harvard - higher than any university outside Harvard itself. Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis assured me in an interview that your place offers a first-rate education. But even the pro-UMB Governor elaborated on little else pertaining to the University. Several other politicians, including Mayor Flynn and Senator Kennedy refused interviews. Obviously UMassfBoston is treated as low priority by prominent politicians. Either that, or the place is considered an extremely sensitive issue. Ultimately, the University continues to make the mistakes of a young adult still struggling with its financially supportive parents and more worldly peers. As late as 1980, students were holding sit-ins , fifty sat in the Chancellor's stairwell, the only access to the administration in this cautiously constructed 60's minded building. Their demand, a greater participation in the school's governance body, was solved with token appointments. And the following year, 1981, students rallied in true UMassfBoston tradition on the Boston Common. As students before them had protested the invasion of Cambodia, and the death of Martin Luther King, 1981's students chanted before the Statehouse gates, too late. The legislative bulldozer had started once again, this time shoving Boston State College down to the former city dump in one of the sloppiest unions in educational history. Without the consent, knowledge, or regards of students or faculty, UMassfBoston had a sister. The merger with Boston State was about as efficient and well received ,as a fusion of two separate bodies into Siamese Twins. Adoption plans were announced August 21, after talks began all of three weeks earlier. Actually, a merger was due january 1982, but the State Board of Regents of Higher Education, advisory committee to the Statehouse, couldn't hold it anymore. Determined to join the schools with exigency's bazooka rather than a well-planned solder, the Board recommended the merger, then forced it through budgetary process. The State's fiscal budget that year clustered funds for UMass, Boston State, and the community colleges. The budgetary hack-job short changed public higher education 21

Page 27 text:

the private schools. And this of course, as the private schools have made it impossible for UMassfBoston to offer a public engineering degree, is how the private schools most definitely fix their competition. The State of Massachusetts, by complying with such restrictions, is in effect paying to keep its public University of higher education on a lower overall academic level. And this limitation in spite of national statistics which reflect concern for the smaller number of U.S. Engineering graduates as compared with the Soviets and japanese. Doesn't that X between UMass and Boston bother anyone? The 52.1 billion significant export industry of private schools pump steady funds into both City!State. Still, the Legislature is reluctant to provide adequate flow to its own Harbor Campus. An anonymous founding faculty member in Chemistry commented. When this school was built we had a budget to equip ourselves with the best. But as the years go by they fthe Statehousej just don't seem to understand that this equipment must be maintained, replaced, and updated The State just can't seem to grant enough to its public higher education, opting instead for cut-backs, mergers, and payments to private schools while restricting UMassfBoston's overall academic offerings and growth. This is, of course, all tax and budget and land and money related, a system between the power sources in Boston and the government. And UMassfBoston, as a tax-funded school, flounders helplessly in a Commonwealth of seemingly greater concerns. One must wonder why UMassfBoston ever came about in the first place - if it is going to be held back so in its nineteenth year. In this respect, the school itself can be seen as very much like its student body: held in check by the societal limitations imposed on their freedom of education. With UMassfBoston, these former ropes appear to have been cut. Yet close inspection of the school's progress reveals that these educational restrictions for minority and poor have merely been loosened. UMassfBoston does teach the previously very single cafeteria worker was imported to the Harbor Campus. underprivileged, yet it is not allowed to teach them everything another university could. For fear of stealing the fire from the older private schools, the young common university remains chained in its aspirations. But perhaps this is part of the real reason such a seemingly good project like UMassfBoston was started in the first place. Maybe the true workings of this school remain in its original bowels, built into its very design - and exemplified by its early scandals. In a way, it seems that UMassfBoston was constructed to loose the State money, to suck taxes like a sewer-hole, thereby maintaining some strange sort of balance in the Commonwealth. This has been a popular view of cynical insiders. But this is only heresay. As stated here before, no one of any true knowledge will address the real issues of UMassfBoston, preferring instead to keep the public in darkness, and cut off from State aid as well as knowledge. But enough of this depressing speculation, enough methane gas, prison jokes, and Boston snobbery. Enough dirt on UMassfBoston. The school is experiencing growing pains. It is approaching the average age of its undergraduate constituency, coming of college age. It now seems appropriate, as it prepares for its future, that UMassfBoston cleans up its act, and keep its original purpose in mind. To effect this change the University of Massachusetts at Boston must do some cutting of its own. UMassfBoston should remain a generic school, offering namebrand learning affordable to the poor, crippled, veteran, minority, and any other that may fit into the class of those who don't fit into the private school system. UMassfBoston should only allow these folks admission. After all, there will most likely be enough poor to fill a meager six buildings on an otherwise barren Point for years to come. Private school transfers should not be allowed. UMB requirements should demand that the degree candidate be low income, from a previously uneducated family, and able to learn - Basic Studies schools should be established to help potential UMassfBoston students achieve the standard necessary to enter the University. UMassfBoston must do some cutting of its own and sever itself from its agressors, from Boston and Dorchester, from the other Universities. 23