University of Chicago - Cap and Gown Yearbook (Chicago, IL)

Page 28 text:

The New College has an interesting and chali lenging future as well as an interesting and challenged past and the two are not wholly unconnected. Donald Meiklejohn Social? Sciences Eight college generations back. this g-g-g-g'g-g- grandfather entered. One 3 later, just before Hutchins, it became New. Three 3'5 passed bc- Iore it became New again. And now We have the New CollegEa-the same g college, tuition up one g. 801 Tax Anthropology 24

Page 27 text:

What is wrong with the University is that Cap and Gown has been in the doldrums. If the in- cumbent staff has the success one wishes for it, then by the time this is read there will be nothing wrong with the University John P. Netherton Decm 01 Students There is always something wrong with the Uni- versity. If this were not the case we would not have a very good University. Our problem is to keep fmding something wrong Warren C. Johnson C kemisiry 23

Page 29 text:

BIoLoclan SCIENCES Additions to the Faculty Dr. Francis Archer, Pathology Dr. Christian C. Rattenborg,Surgc1-y Retired Kenji Toda, Zoology William D. Taliafcrro. Microbiology Lester R. Dragstedt, Surgery The New College? It threatens to become part of the University of Chicago again. It may again supply graduate students to the Divi- sions. Divisional faculty may rediscover the high quality of our undergraduates. College and Divisional faculty may become part of the same academic community. This could be good Philip M. Hausa: Sociology The New College looks rather familiar to me because it is similar in outline to the Univer- sity in the 1920's when I was an undergraduate, When the same professors are teaching similar courses the administrative subdivisions arelft 50 very important. And the courses for under- graduates are incomparably bttttr than in my day. Fred Eggan Anthrojmlogy 25