University of Chicago - Cap and Gown Yearbook (Chicago, IL)

Text from Pages 1 - 184 of the 1960 volume:

Cap and Gown I960 The University of Chicago Cap and Gown: 1960 Contents The Chancellor resigns 6 Two views of the new college 12 The faculty speaks 16 Hutchins' speech 26 The administration 32 Darwin 36 Time Will Tell 38 Huxley1s speech 40 The visitors 50 Revels 52 Glee Club 60 Orchestra 62 Folklore Society 64 Jazz, bells, recorders 66 University Theater 68 Outing Club 74 Student Union 76 WUCB 80 Student Government 84 EPA Court 86 Politics in general 88 Blackfriars 90 FOTA 92 Publications 96 The survey 102 The dormitaries 112 Fraternities 118 Womefs clubs 130 Athletics 136 Shapirds collection 156 Pan-American games 158 Advertising 162 The staff 176 Headline of the year: The Chancellor resigns On Tuesday, March 29, Chancelior Kimpton an- nounced his resignation. With the spring quarterJ then, the ttKimpton Era? became, as the Mama?! redundantly observed, Ha. fixed time period, bound by dates at both ends? Though reportedly under consideration for a number of months, the action came as a surprise to trustees, faculty, students, and press. Their expressions of shock, amazement, disappointment, and, in some quarters, re- lief have been adequately chronicled elsewhere. Similar- ly, reviews of Kimptonk reign as well as evaluations of it are better left to more formal and Olympian publica- tions. Whether he is ultimately deemed to haVe ied the University through an interlude 0f pregress 0r regres- sion, of true accomplishment or superficial englistening, it is certain that he will be remembered as a man of pur- pose, accomplishment, and sincerity. The words and pictures of the day of resignation enforce this conclu- s10n. . . . tiEvery era of the University has its special problems and when I became Chancellor I found some which required priority of consideration. HIn common with other urban univertities, the Uni- versity of Chicago was confronted with the problem of encroaching blight. If the University was to exist, that threat had to be removed. It has been removed, and we now have assurance of a stable community in which the University will have the environment essential to its life and activities. KtAnother goal I set myself was to stabilize the flnan- cial affairs of the University. This involved bringing its annual budgets into close balance even while in- creasing faculty salaries and it also required substantial additions to our capital funds for endowment and ex- pansion of our physical plant. ttThe campaign of 1955-58 and the activity it enw gendered led to the addition of large sums to our en- dowment, a real increase in the level of our faculty salaries, and a needed expansion in our physical facili- ties. Our budget for the year 1960761 is in balance. HNine years ago our professional schools, with the brilliant exception of Medicine, demanded improve- ment. The rise of the Law School and of the Graduate School of Business has been spectacular. There has been a solid strengthening of the School of Social Service Administration and the Federated Theological Faculty. We have added the Graduate School of Edu- cation so that the University can meet its obligations to the primary and secondary school systems of the country. IrOur college had the best-conceived undergraduate education in the country, but its lack Of articulation with the basic structure of American education had created a number of difhculties. It also tended to be isolated from the rest of the University. The College has been reorganized in a series of gradual steps, so that it is better related within and without the Univerr sity, without sacrifice of its unique educational ele- ments. nThe four divisions of the University, in which our research and graduate training are centered, were strong in 1951 and they are strong today. The Univer- sity has continued to attract and encourage the best scholars and scientists by paying them well, providing them with excellent facilities, and maintaining the Uni- versityh unrivalled spirit of freedom. ttI am proud of this record and I am deeply grateful that I was given the opportunity nine years ago to undertake the leadership of this University. No other University in the country has our combination of a. board of trustees that is so courageous, cooperative, and academically concerned; a faculty who deeply be- lieve in the Universityis destiny; and a loyal and intel- ligent alumni body. I owe a deep debt also to the people of the community, who stuck it out with us in good times and in bad. 10 :M'hy. then do I want to resign? My conviction is that the head of such a university as this one can do his best work for it within a reasenabty short time. The University every 59 often requires a change in leaders who can apply fresh and sharply objective appraisals, and start anew, free of the associations, friendships, and scars of a common struggle. ttI believe that the history of our University bears me out in showing the renewed Vitality and intensity which came with each of my prndecessors and the new and distinctive contributions they were able to make through the direction they gave the University. nThis is the more understandablc-and this is not a complainthwhen I remind you that the job is an enormously demanding and exhausting one. hFinally. I can only say that, were I not confident ycu could hnd sonwone who could do the job from here On better than I could do it, I would not resign. The University of Chicago means more to me than I am able to express. The New College: Two views 12 Dean Simpson sketches new college phiIOSOphy The object of the New College is simply to provide the best possible Liberal Education. If we confine ourseives to generalities, a Liberal Edu- cation can be easily enough defined. It is a matter of knowledge, skills, and standards Opinions about the knowledge which an educated man ought to possess have varied greatlyesome highly educated men would cheer- fully admit to a vast ignorance: but an argument could be made for the view that he ought to know a little about everything and a lot about something. There is less dis- agreement about the essential skills, which are the ca- pacity to think Clearly and to write and speak lucidly. And there is something like unanimity about the stand- ards. An educated man is a civilized being who has some notion of excellence and some feeling for the needs of his 0er times. The talented hour, or the creative recluse, is no exception to this statement: such people are either uneducated, or they have forgotten what a liberal education means. To this definition, we may add the observation that it takes most high school graduates four years to obtain admittance to Hthe society of educated men;l and that the BA. degree is the usual passport. When we descend from generalities t0 the opportu- nities offered by a particular institution, we plunge into a welter of hopes half realized, and of flavors determined by the folds in the local soil. An undergraduate educatiOn at Chicago has always been a liberal experience for those who could take ad- vantage of it. The traditions and resources of a great University can hardly fail to make some impression on an open, eager mind. But the institutional arrangements can either help or binder, and we would be less than honest if we did not admit that we have suffered from a system of divided control. On the one hand, there was a College dedicated to a demanding idea of General Education. On the other hand, there were departments offering elective and specialized courses. The division was such that there were often two streams of under- graduate life, one passing through the College and then departing elsewhere with a degree in General Education twhose value was often less apparent to others than it was to its ownerl, the second stream entering the de- partments with their eyes on a professional career. The undergraduate who tried to get the equivalent of a nor- mal BA. on our own campus often found it a frustrating experience. His two sets of teachers lived in different worlds and communication between them was far from easy. We have now reorganized ourselves. The Idea of Gen- eral Education, as expounded by the Old College, is cordially embraced by the New. General Education, rightly understood, is an indispensable part of Liberal Education. The program of the first two years in the New College, with its staff-taught courses. its imagina- tively planned readings, and its small discussion classes, preserves this tradition, and there is probably no college in the country where a better general education is ole felted, But the privilege of the student to induige his own whims among the elective courses. and his right to get down to his specialization without needless delay, is now safeguarded. If we have learned one thing from a noble experiment in a prescribed General Education, it is the necessity to defend the individual student against the excesses of the planners. Moreover we have ended the System Of divided con- trol. For the first time in our history we have a College with full jurisdiction over the whole four-year 8A., and its faculty is composed, in about equal proportions, of General Educationalists and Departmental Special- ists. May they mix freely and fruitfully! They have much to learn from each other, and together they can produce a Liberal Education which will be the envy of the country. So much for the education which goes on in the class- room. But there is a whole range of informal education which depends on the imaginative development 01' resi- dential life, of extra-curricular activities, and of contacts with the wider world of art, letters, and practical achieve- ment. Where the old College was austere, withdrawn, and even provincial, the new can expect to be better housed, better balanced, and fully in touch with the world around it. HLiberalfl in the old, undogniatic sense which it once bore, is a good word. It is still the best description of the quality which distinguishes an education for life from every inferior substitute. Chicago undergraduates have always been protected from vocationalism; in the New College they have also been freed from the fetters of any special philosophy. For a time We separated our- selves from the main stream of humanistic education. We have now rejoined its ALAN SIMPSON Dean of Ute Cotiege I3 Lowrey looks at spirit of college past, present, Future The New College presents us allestudents and facul- ties and that hybrid collection of individuals we loosely term Hcentral administrationllewith hard problems as well as great opportunities. Can a University whose central concerns have always been research and the training of graduate students develop the best four-year undergraduate program in the country? Can we, with a student body noted for its heterogeneity. build up the kind of esprit which marks the student bodies of Col- leges such as Reed and Vassar and Swarthmore and Grinnell and Sewaneeecolleges which, because of an insularity of one kind or another, and because of a dedi- cation to ltteaching. give their students a sense of focus, oneness, direction? Can we make a new College which will attract the best potential minds in the conn- try, which will over four years allow talent to mature faster, go farther, emerge better-trained and better- equipped than it would have had it been put in the seed- bed of Harvard, Stanford, a powerful, moneyed, state institution. or a small residential college? Well. we have resources that no other institution has, and we have a tradition. The tradition is one oi being uxilifferent. not out of eccentricity, but for very hard- headed reasons. The Old College pioneered because a group of men here knew most undergraduate education in America was hag-ridden by allegiance to the forms of the pasteand the efficacy of their Pioneering is per- haps best shown by the fact that Chicagols tlcontrover- sial ideas are now accepted by almost all of the great institutions in the country. Under one rubric or anu 14 other, most of the principles tend a lot of the materialsl developed here are now ltstandard? And resources? Anyone who has studied or taught in a variety of the colleges and universities in this country will tell you that Chicago has always been peculiarly blessed in hav- ing more toughminded, imaginative persons who are not afraid to try new things than any other institutione persons who have shown an amazing capacity for find- ing root problems and working out very practical solu- tions to them, In no other university or college that I know is there such a constant interchange of ideas as there is here, such a. vigorous and continuous iteross- polinizationll among disciplines. We have a deserved reputation of being disputatiouseour enemies call it chssedness and our friends uintellectual ferment? So we are changing things again, and I doubt that anyone will ever accuse us of imitation as we work out the new system. We will undoubtedly be accused of a lot of things-r-and a great many of the accusations, perhaps the most vitriolic ones, will come from inside our own structure. For which we ought to give thanks; that critical attitude is precisely our greatest asset. Free inquiry, free experimentation: as long as we keep those, we stand an excellent chance of developing some- thing which will bear out the justness of Mr. Jeffersonls remark. ttThe truth? be said, llcan stand by itself? PERRIN H. LOWREY Humanities The Faculty speaks In order to present a unique and perhaps more genu- ine picture of the University of Chicago Faculty, Cap and Gown has attempted an experiment in this yeaHs issue. With a 25-word limit, which was completely ig- nored, a group of daringA-and ingeniousifaculty mem- bers were asked to comment on one of the following ten suggested subjects: politics religion Life . football . Truth . students . Chicago Tribune . the New College . sex . what is wrong with the University omuDMJude-Jk H C Interestingly and perhaps significantly enough, relig- ion and sex were avcided, ignored, or overlooked by our respondents Life is we compiex to be commented on in two sentences, This is my comment on life. Max Rheinstein Law 16 What would be most welcome would be the abandonment by all peoples of the many super- stitions which plague them, and the acceptance by all of a scientific philosophy. Herluf H. Strandskov Zoology WIhe Itacher ought not to serve the pupil, but both the Spirit Uni. Hessej. Education is little more than intellectual and spiritual encouraged ment to such free obedience. Gerhard Meyer Wi1h ML Meyer is, on the right, Christian Mackaucr of the College Economics History staffJ 17 18 Sirozier EUnix'ersity Dean of Students till 19383: How about coming up on the porch and joining us for a drink? Loomer: Sorry. but I can't because Pm in training for the new football team that you and the Chancellor am building and raising money for. Bernard M. Loomer F.T.FV Football might interfere with the golf practice grccn on the west side of Stagg Field. but as a golfer I wouId even approve this inirusion in order to see the Marnons kickoff in intercoli Icgiale play. G. R. Hopwood Director Financial Aid Mankind is distinguished from the beasts at least as much by his capacity to rationalize as by his capacity to reason. Milton Friedman Economics There was a gag many years ago that U. of C. politics ran the gamut from the extreme left to just ieit of center. Now it is reported that stu- dents have become fat and contented. I offer no sour grapes comment; may they grow ever more fat and contented. Irving Kaplansky Mathematics SOCIAL SCIENCE Additions to the Family Rosalind D. Cartwright, Human Development Bernard Wcissberger, History Philip White, History Vernon Dibble, Sociology James Q. Wilson, Political Science J. Denis Sargan, Economics David Meiselman, Economics Franklin Fisher, Economics Eric Woif, Anthropology Seth Lcacock, Anthropology Conrad Briner, Education R. Wray Strowig, Education Mark H. Haller, History Klaus H. cherie, Social Science Faunile I. Rinn, Social Science Robert E. Reader, Histmy Man: J. Swartz, Anthropology Helen Smith, Education Stephen P. Hencicy. Education Kenneth j. Preble, IL, Education jamcs M. Lipham, Education Books Ernest W, Burgess: Aging in Western Societies adj Samuel J. Beck: Refine: Io Inteliigmce Friedrich A. Hayek: The Caimitution of Liberty George Liska: The New Staczcmf: 501 Tax: The Evolution 51 Life, The Evolution 0f Man, laws: in Evolution mm Retired Eari S. Johnson, General Social Sciences 19 The custom of distinguishing students from faculty is objectionable: if a professor is not a student he is a charlatan, and only a great charr Iatan can be comiortable in a great university. George Sligler Business Student Health work presents problems not en- countered in mcdical practice with other occu- pationa! and age groups. But, the difficulties are compensated by the satisfaction of helping young people achieve and maintain health which is essential to the fullest use Of their education. Henrietta Herbalsheimer Student Health Nothing looks as much like genius and original- 11y as pure insanity, except possible genius and originaliiy. Inseph E. Mayer Chemistry 20 PHYSICAL SCIENCES Additions to the Faculty F rancis Anscombe, Statistics Leonard Baum, Mathematics Alberto Calderson, Mathematics Michael Dewar, Chemistry Melvin Katz, J12, Statistics Sherwood Parker, Physics Sheldon Penman, Physica William Stinespring, Mathematics Earl Stramberg, Mathematics Robert W. Thompson, Physics Books Cyril Smith: New Edition of the Pirotcchnia of Vannocciao Biringuccio: A History of Metaliogmpky Louis Barton: Radar Mewomtagy C. H. B. Priestly: Turbulent Transfer in the Lower Atmosphere The students ought to be ashamed. Nobody but the faculty is objecting to subjecting them to special test-oaths before they can collect government scholarship money. Samuel K. AHison Physics One of the strange and distressing character- istics of American students. including most U. 01' C. students, is their intellectual immatur- ity. They are, as a rule, more mature than their European peers in the practical aspects of life. When it comes to marriage, child rearing, get? ting a job, and similar matters. American stu- dents are more mature than European 01' Asian students. But intellectually they are more im- mature. This manifests itself in their inability to devise their own programs, their strong need for guidance, their lack of adventuresnmeness in the selection of courses. They prefer the ttsafcf prescribed programs to striking out for themselves, the rehash nf well-worn curricula t0 imaginative new combinations. This mayr make good sense from a vocational standpoint, but it is not likely to create soon a dedicated association of scholars. and for this reason the really creative scholar is likely to remain a maverick in American society Bert FA Hoselitz Social Sciences 21 HUMANITIES Additions to the Faculty Danilu L. Aguzzi. Italian Edward C. Dimock, Jr., Bengali Language and Literature George Haley, Spanish Hugh McLean, Russian Language and Literature Ralph J. Mills. J L, English John C. Osborne, German Fred :1. Siegler. Philosophy H. Colin Stim, Music 5. Ronald Weiner, English Johannes A. B. Van Buitenen, Indology Heinz M. Lubasz, English History Books R. C. Bald: Seuwwemh Century Poetry, Dame and Ike Dmrys J 01111 Corominasz Terence, Hecym, Adolphus Gosta Franzen: Rum: Orinamn George Haley: Vincents Espim! and Marcos de Obregcm: A Life and its Literary Interpretation Ernest Sirluck: The C on: plete Prose Works of 105m Milton tedJ Bernard Weinberg: A History of Literary Criticism 57.: the Italian Renaissance Gerald E. Bentley: William Blake'J Four 2505, A Blake Bibliography Walter Blair: Mark Twain and Huck Finn Richard G. Starn: 605k Stuart M, Tave: The. Amiable Humarist Morton D. Zablc: Youth and Five Orker Tuies, C harks Dickem' Best. Stories, T329 Art of Ruth Draper Norman B. Specter: Lax Comens Retired William F , Edgcrton, Oriental Languages and Civilization Ludwig Bachhofer, Department of Art There i5 the danger that the dc-bcatniked New College- tnut yet quite discernihla will cam for 115 the unqualilied approval of the Chicago Tribune. Richard B. Richter Medicine m;.,,w.. What is wrong with the University is that Cap and Gown has been in the doldrums. If the in- cumbent staff has the success one wishes for it, then by the time this is read there will be nothing wrong with the University John P. Netherton Decm 01 Students There is always something wrong with the Uni- versity. If this were not the case we would not have a very good University. Our problem is to keep fmding something wrong Warren C. Johnson C kemisiry 23 The New College has an interesting and chali lenging future as well as an interesting and challenged past and the two are not wholly unconnected. Donald Meiklejohn Social? Sciences Eight college generations back. this g-g-g-g'g-g- grandfather entered. One 3 later, just before Hutchins, it became New. Three 3'5 passed bc- Iore it became New again. And now We have the New CollegEa-the same g college, tuition up one g. 801 Tax Anthropology 24 BIoLoclan SCIENCES Additions to the Faculty Dr. Francis Archer, Pathology Dr. Christian C. Rattenborg,Surgc1-y Retired Kenji Toda, Zoology William D. Taliafcrro. Microbiology Lester R. Dragstedt, Surgery The New College? It threatens to become part of the University of Chicago again. It may again supply graduate students to the Divi- sions. Divisional faculty may rediscover the high quality of our undergraduates. College and Divisional faculty may become part of the same academic community. This could be good Philip M. Hausa: Sociology The New College looks rather familiar to me because it is similar in outline to the Univer- sity in the 1920's when I was an undergraduate, When the same professors are teaching similar courses the administrative subdivisions arelft 50 very important. And the courses for under- graduates are incomparably bttttr than in my day. Fred Eggan Anthrojmlogy 25 The new low buildings are opened- A highiight of the year was the opening of the new law buildings de- signed by Eero Saarinen. An impressive array of prominent people took part in the seven dedicatory conferences and lectures; among them: Earl Warren, Dag Hammarskjold, Richard Nixon, Nelson Rock- efeller, seven Nobel Peace Prizewinners. and Mr. Huichins. cm ex-Choncellor returns and 1e, e; gives 0 speech POWER AND RESPONSIBILITY by ROBERT M. HUTCHINS Delivered November 18, 1959 as part of the Sec- ond Dedicatory Conference of the new Jaw build- ings. On being invited to address this distinguished audience on the subject of Power and Responsibility, I turned first, of course, to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. I found that there was no article on Responsibility and that the one on Power begins. :The word power: as used by the engineer. . . 3i Eager, as always, to stretch my mind, I took up the Syntopicoe, only to discover that neither Power nor Responsibiiity is one of the Great Ideas. Since the Encyclopaedia Britannica is described on the title page, which bears the imprimatur of this Uni- versity, as a New Survey of Universal Knowledge, we must conclude that nothing is known of Power or Re- sponsibility. Since the Syntopicon is the Social Register of ideas, we must conclude that Power and Responsibil- ity have not yet iiarrivedf! How is it possible to have a symposium about matters of which we are totally ignorant, which may not exist, and which, if they do exist! have a low or insignificant status? If you ask why I accepted this invitation when I had been assured 0n the highest authority that the subject was trivial or irrelevant, the answer is that my motive 27 was unworthy. I wanted to bask in the reflected glory of my old friends, the Dean and Faculty of this Law school. They include my teachers, my fellow students, and my colleagues at the Yale Law school, and my stu- dents and colleagues here. I am bound to them by ties of obligation and affection that run back in some cases forty years. I knew them in their days of poverty and struggle. I am happy to saiute them as they enter upon a new era of Gracious Living. In order not to be altogether derelict on this occasion I must build up the subject you have selected into one that is worthy of your attention. I was relieved to hnd, through further research, that Britannica and the 53m- topiccm were entirely right. Neither of the ideas in the title of this symposium is very interesting in itself. Re- sponsibility cannot exist without power. And power, by itself, is simply an inconvenient fact of life. A. A. Berle, Jr., in his new book, Power Without Property, observes that almost nothing has been written about power. And 28 Professor McKeon, in his authoritative paper, makes the same remark about responsibility, adding that it is a comparative parvenu, born in 1787. These two ideas, or words, impress us only in com- bination. In combination they lead us into all the major legal and political problems of the West. The legal and political history of the West may be seen as the effort to make power responsible. The problem of pnwer and responsibility is identical with that of a free and just society. Freedom implies power of some kind, and jus- tice implies responsibility. The American tradition is the tradition of dispersing power and trusting to luck, or to the Invisible Hand, to produce responsibility. From James Madison to Rein- hold Niebuhr the modem has been that salvation lies in having many contending centers of power. The Feder- alist am tinds safety from factions in having a great many of them, fighting over a large territory, In the latest pamphlet published by the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Mr. Niebuhr, referring to the corporation and the labor unionJ said, HWhat health we haVe is due to the fact that these dubious sovereign- ties balance one another. Mr. Niebuhr went on to deal with the function of government as follows: HIt is only the purpose of government to see to it that the over-all purposes are fulfilled within the terms of the spon- taneous desires, motives, etc. of all the centers of power. This is the new liberalism as against the old liberalism. The old liberalism assumed that spontaneity, free enter- prise, free market, all contributed to the general welfare. We know that is not true. We know there must be Checks and balances. The government, if it finds one center of power is too strong, must raise up another cen- ter of power in the interest of justice. There is something unsatisfactory in the notion that the whole matter of power and responsibility, freedom and justice, is going to be solved because the centers of power will balance one another and that the role of government is simply to see to it that the supply of such centers is adequate. In order to have any confidence that if enough centers of power contend they will make one another responsible and give us a just society, we must attribute to Provi- dence a greater interest in the welfare of the American peeple than either our history or our merits would seem to justify. My purpose this morning is to suggest the pos sibility that we as a people, as a community learning together, might learn how to assume conscious control of our destiny. In considering this possibility, one of the grossest errors we can make is to assume that we have exhausted our intelligence and imagination, that is, our capacity for learning. The fact is that we have hardly ever exerted it because we never had to. To say, for example, that there is something inherently degrading and cor- rupt about American politics and that therefore govern- ment must govern as little as possible is to overlook the fact that governments have been transformed because communities have learned to make them responsible. Nobody living in Sir Robert Walpoleis day could have imagined that in 150 years the British would be setting standards of honesty in public administration for the world. It will not escape our notice, I hope, that this transformation was accompanied, and in some degree causedJ by the reformation of the British universities. If a society is to be free and just, all power in it must be made responsible This means that all power must be brought to the test of reason. The obvious way of doing this is through the law. It is no answer to say that some laws are unreasonable. Of course they are. But the law is still what Dr. Johnson said it was, lKthe last result of human wisdom acting upon human experience for the beneflt of the public.n We have been preoccupied since Machiavelli with social physiesepolities is who gets what and how and the law is what the courts will doebut the law is still a work of reason. If it is not, then perhaps I may be permitted to say; in an ad hammer; kind of way, that this school has no claim to be a part of a intellectual institution. To borrow a phrase from an unpublished paper by Bertrand de Jouvenel, the law is the method by which potentia- beeomes potesten, by which power becomes au- thority, by which it acquires legitimacy in its possession and is constrained to reasonableness in its exercise. Office means duty. This idea is familiar enough. In fact the deepest con- stitutional conviction that we have is that governmental power must be made responsible. When the Constitu- tion was framed, government and the individual were the only two entities in society. Government was the one with the power. Now other centers of power may have a more direct and drastic effect on the individual and on the life of the country than any 18th Century govern- ment could have hoped to have. This raises new con- stitutionai questions. As Arthur S. Miller has said in a paper about to be published by the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, uWhenever any organization or group perw forms a function of a sufhciently important nature, it can be said to be performing a governmental function and thus should have its actions considered against the broad provisions of the Constitution. In the racial cove- nant eases, the white primary cases, and the company town cases, the Court has shown that the concept of private action must yield to a conception of state action where public functions are being performed. . . . With the continuing pluralizing of American society and the increasing recognition of the governmental power of private groups, it can be forecast with some certainty that the trend of the C0urt in lpubliC-izingl private groups will continue. It should become the important constitutional law development of the mid-twentieth century. Mr. Miller ends his essay with these words: hThe study of constitutional law today shOuld include not only what governments can and cannot doI but also what they must do? But if governments must do more than they did, the task of making governmental power re- sponsible is back with us in new and disturbing forms. A United States senator remarked in my presence the other day that Congress was ceasing to be a legislative body. If it brought power to the test of reason at all, it did So not by making laws but by holding hearings. Using the example of miiitary expenditures, he said that if Congress increased them, the Administration would impound the money. If Congress reduced them, the Ad- ministration would reschedule its purchases. Bureauc- racy in government and in political parties and the com- plexity of the operations of government, present and proposed mean that the constitutional theory of re5pon- sible government requires the most thoroughgoing re- examination. We might learn something about political 29 parties and public corporations from Engiand, some- thing about making the bureaucracy responsible from the Cemeil $1?th in France, and from Western Ger- many something about how government may help make private economic power respensible through internal participation rather than external control. We cannot assume that if something must be done to make private power responsible the government must do it. The alternatives are not as we usually seem to think they are, between governmental control and letting private power run wild until its flamboyance is Checked by collision with other private powers. There are other ways of bringing power to the test of reason, ways that may do more to preserve the vitality and spontaneity of individuals and groups than the law can do. The law is general, and it is coercive. It is, therefore, a rather blunt instrument. Mr. Berle appeals to what he calls the ttPublic con- sensus. He says, iiDoes this inchoatc public consensus have any relatien to settled law? The anSWer must be that it does include settled principles of law. But it also includes capacity to criticize that law. From time to time it may demand changes in existing lawf' Mr. Berle finds the public consensus formed and represented by the influence of leading businessmen and i'the conclusions of careful university professors, the reasoned opinions of specialists, the statements of re- 30 sponsihle journalists, and at times the solid pronounce- ments of respected politicians? He goes on to say, I Fhese, and men like them, are thus the real tribunal to which the American system is Fmall y accountable. Taken together, this group, so long as its members are able to communicate their viewsJ becomes the forum of account: ability for the holding and use of economic power. Col- lectively they are the developers of public consensus, the men first sought to guide the formation of public opinion to any given application. At hrst blush it would seem that if economic power is now responsible to this tribunal, we do not need to con- cern ourselves very much with making economic power responsible. This tribunal exists. And though its mem- bers may have some little difficulty from time to time communicating their views, they are always in session, and always; presumably, engaged in holding American business responsible. The consensus, we are told, is always ahead of the law, but some of its principles are well Enough defined to be called inchoate law. The consequences of the violation of these standards may be serious. One result, Mr. Berle says, may be that Hthe standards set up by the conseusus will suddenly he made into explicit law in case of abuse of power?! Mr. Berle points to a wide range of issues on which businessmen are likely to find themselves in trouble if they do things which, though now thought to be legally permissable, violate the standards set up by the public consensus. We are weil acquainted with the notion that the insti- tutiens of this ceuntry operate within limits set by pub- lic opinion. The hourishing trade of public relations is a testimony to this fact. Presumably there are, and al- ways will be, leaders of public opinion. It may be that some of them are the kind of people that Mr. Berle appoints t0 the tribunal to which American business is accountable. Some doubt is cast on his selections, at least as far as Southern California is concerned, by a state- ment of Professor Gilbert Brighouse of Occidental col- lege that appeared in the L05 Angeles Times on October 28. Mr. Brighouse said that neither intelligence, honesty, industry, nor loyalty was necessary for business leader- ship. He said, ttOne of the greatest leaders in Southern California, for instance, is an imbecile. But, when they really need something done, this is the man they go to. But let us assume that the tribunal exists, no matter who its members are. Mr. Berle may be right in saying that businessmen had better watch out for it. But it must be admitted that today this tribunal is working rather erratically. Its Operation, in practice, is as in- explicable and unreliable as that of the Invisible Hand. In the helds with which I am more familiar than I am with business no such tribunal appears to exists, or, if it exists, it is totally ineffective. Nothing appears to in- Huence our educational institutions, nothing, that is, except money. I see no inchoate law that they are obey- ing. I see none that the media of mass communication obey. If they had been obeying the most elementary rule of inchoate lawedonlt cheatithe quiz show scandals could not have occurred. And I am prepared to wager that the corporate interests that control television will not be penalized through having inchoate law become explicit law. It is signihcant that the law proposed by ML Kintner of NBC is one that would cause the com- panies little inconvenience. I raise the question whether our institutions are equal to the task of developing public consensus, inehoate law, or law. I see no grounds for optimism in the present operation of the public consensus or of the loose, infor- mal unorganized tribunals that are said to form and represent it. What we need is criticism. The issue is whether the kind of spontaneous, sporadic, uninstitu- tionalized criticism with which we have always been familiar, which adds up to the voices of unrelated soloists singing in different keys, or even singing different pieces, is adequate in our present society to bring power to the test of reason. We should be able to look to the universities, the press, and the professional associations. They do not seem to be in the best of health. The. universities have become folk institutions, reflecting, rather than criticiz- ing, the society. They are now dedicated to chaperonage, vocational certification, and specialized research. The media of communication are not critical of practices upon which they think their prosperity depends. The professional associations, even in what used to be called the learned professions, have tended to look like the propaganda divisions of pressure groups. I suggest that if we are going to learn how to make power responsible through criticism we are going to have to find out how to make the institutions of criticism responsible. Although I see few signs that the universities, the media of communication, and the professional associa- tions are interested in becoming centers of independent criticism, there are some indications that we may even- tually develop new institutions for the purpose. The recommendation of the Commission on the Freedom of the Press that a, continuing agency be established to appraise the performance of the media is being actively debated. Senator John Sherman Cooper has introduced a bill calling for a national advisory council on educa- tion. At a recent meeting of the Consultants to the Cen- ter fur the Study of Democratic Institutions, at which both Mr. Berle and Mr. Niebuhr were present, there was unanimous agreement upon the need for a new body, a new organ of criticism, to assist in the more systematic development of the public consensus with re. gard to the economic order. There are some stirrings among scientists, engineers, and medical men that may give us some hope that these professions may ultimately try to give some reasonable direction to the greatest irrew sponsible power at large in the world, the power of tech- nology. If we as a people are to assume conscious control of our destiny, we shall have to learn how to take con- scious control of this power, which new rules us with a tyranny so familiar and so absolute that we docilely follow in its wake whereever it leads, and seem prepared to obey all its commands, including the command to com- mit suicide. We have a new society and a new world. Old slogans and obsolescent institutions adapted to different days are blind guides through the present crisis. The clarihcav tion of the issues of power and responsibility, of freedom and justice, calls for all the intelligence and imagination we can muster. It is reassuring that this group, under the most favorable and distinguished auspices, is addressing itself to the task. Albert F. Cotton, busy Bursar, stops counting coins long enough to pose. Univac, Hling cabinets, .,H.. Admissions policy straight from. this direFtor's Popular Max Putzel deftly handles three posi- mouth, Charles D. UConnBll ls 1nterv12wed tions-Assistant Dean of Undergraduate Stu- over WUCR dents, instructor, househead. 32 UC's most popular husband and wife team Jim Hat ler and Mary Alice Newman in a discussion at C-Gmup. The former is Assistant Dean of Students and directs student activities and housing; the latter is an Assistant Dean of Undergraduate Students. Now near the end of his first year as Dean of Students in the College. George Plays relaxes, lights up. and administration keep school running Chief head counter. Registrar William Van Cleve, is an invaluable ally to students work- ing on polls, projects. 33 34 Before the resignation: An interview with the Chancellor In the middle of the second quarter Cap and Gown sent a reporter to the fifth floor of the ad building to talk to the Chancellor. The Chancellor proved to be a gra- cious host and a thoughtful conversationalist. Neither voluble nor taciturn, he spoke with casual deliberation. He apparently made a sincere effort to answer every question, but at times our reporter felt that his answers were somewhat evasive. LAK: LAK: : What do you do Mr. Kimpton ? What is your job? Let me use a Socratic image to answer that. Pin the midwife 0f the University. I help solve the administrative problems which any institution this size has. Fm responsible for Argonne. If someone in the Social Sciences department leaves, thatls my worry. If a student commits suicide, that also becomes one of my problems. : Then what do the trustees d0? LAK: The trustees own this university. If they wanted to, they could close it tomorrow. Every major administrative innovation is approved by the board of trustees. : Who are the trustees? LAK: The trustees are simply the outstanding men of this community. : Will UC remain research orientated? Yes. This university has been and will remain re- search orientated. In fact, the college was a. kind of afterthought. The real problem is the improve- ment of teaching at the undergraduate level. LAK: LAK: : Some, for instance Meyer Eisenberg, feel that the quality of teaching in the college will be lowered by the requirement that instructors in the college the research. There will, of course, remain a difference in em- phasis. The major emphasis in the college will still be on teaching, in the departments on research. But a good teacher must do research in his field in order to remain a good teacher. Benson Ginz- berg, for instance, was active in research while he was teaching undergraduate courses. : Isn't UC notorious for its student-faculty segre- gation? No, I think that there is a rift between the stu- dent body and the faculty at most great univer- sities. But it is a problem. When I was Dean of Students, the housing personnel was composed of faculty members, but it was impossible to keep them. : Where is UC going? LAK: A great university does not go anywhere. It is. I hope that we will become an institution with an undergraduate body of about 5000 students and our present number of graduate students. We will remain a research institution. : Is the student body changing? LAK: No. I would begin to worry if our students were less qualified academically. So in essentials, our student body will remain the same. : Is football coming back? LAK: I would be in favor of its return if it played its proper role. UCIs Darwin Centennial Celebration attracts scholars and students, P'rumintnt. amnni: t grandson of L Li 1nnur, and k. r Jul . inspires papers and discussion The purpose of the Darwin Centennial was to co- memorate the publication of The Origin of Spain. Since The Origin of Species was a most significant sci- entific achievement which went far towards liberating the mind, a celebration worthy of it should itself be an educational and scientific achievement. This was our hope. It was made a Scientific event by bringing together a wide variety of Scientists and asking them to bring to bear their special disciplines on the subject of evolu tion. For the first time the whole range of relevant Sciences focused on a single broad subject. These schol- ars wrote papers in advance and exchanged them. Hav- ing thus learned something of each otheris mind, they met together to compare notes and to discuss their differences. It was a contribution to public education because the scientists dismissed the issues before a public that in- cluded not only an audience brought to the University from all over the world, but representatives of news- papers, magazines, radio, television, and motion pie- tures. who would carry the story to all. It was because it was public and educational that the men of different specialties were compelled to speak also to one another and to come to some Couelusions. The result was quite possibly a new integration of the social and cultural with the biological that will give us a fresh start for the second hundred years. SOL TAX Chairman: Darwin Centennial Committee 37 m ,zmtnirm Thu- opuning curtain reveals a H :11 Hayden set. Win Strgcke ton sLepsL and the :11ch bodied chw of the Beagle dancing a hOJ'nplpE. Darwin is memorialized in song and dance Openin: night tcn5inn is CVidL'Ilt :15 choral direc- lo: Roland Bailvy hum; scurc m smmd engineer in Mandel 112m buscmcnl. Students gathered at the British Museum react to lecturers Otto Schles- inger Ucitj and John P. Nethcrton with derision and boredom rcspcc- tively: Bob Ashcnhurst fcompuscrl. Jo Anne Schlag. Grnv Radish and Rick Riccardo sing of Du:- win's revolutionary lhttnn, Director Ted Liss maneuvers the amt through one of the Ehuw's lwenLy-onc musictil numbcts. .. i gig xii... . :557gl33. In . . : 1.258.333 3...: 73.3.3.3: . 33414??? . . m Sir Julian's controversial speech: the complete text THE EVOLUTIONA RY VISION by SIR JULIAN HUXLEY An address delivered at the Darwin Centennial Convo- cation of the University of thcago, Thursday, Novem- ber 26, 1959; to be pubtisked 1'74 hfssues in Evolution? the third votume of the Darwin Centennial Papers, pub- Zislzed by the University of Chicago Press as Evolution After Darwin. Future historians may well take this Centennial week as epit- omizing an important critical period in the history of this earth of oursethe period when the process of evolution, in the person of inquiring man, began to be truly couscious of itself. This is, so far as I am aware, the first time when authorities on the evolutionary aspects of the three great branches of sci- entiflc study, the inorganic sciences, the life sciences, and the human sciences, have been brought together for mutual criti- cism and joint discussion. We participants Who are assembled here, some of us from the remotest parts of the globe, by the magnificently intelligent enterprise of the University of Chi- cago, include representatives of astronomy, physics and chem- istry; of zoology, botany and paleontology; of physiology, ecol- ogy, and ethnology; of psychology, anthropology and sociology. 41 We have all been asked to contribute an account of our knowledge and understanding of evolution in our special helds t0 the Centennialls common pool, to sub- mit our contributions to the criticism and comn'tents of our fellow participants in quite other fields, to engage in public discussion of key points in evolutionary theoe ry, and to have our contributions and discussions pub- lished t0 the world at large. This is one of the first public occasions on which it has been frankly faced that all aspects of reality are subject to evolution, from atoms and stars to flSh and flowersJ from lish and flowers to human societies and values-indeerl that all reality is a single process of evolution And ours is the first period in which we have acquired Sufficient knowledge to begin to see the outline of this vast process as a whole. 42 Our tzw'olutionaryr vigion now includes the discovery that biological advance exists, and that it takes place in a series of steps or grades, each grade occupied by a successful group of animals or plants, each group sprung from a preexisting one and characterized by a new and improved pattern of organization. Improved organization gives biological advantage. Accordingly the new type becomes a successful or dom- inant group; It spreads and multiplies and differentiates into a multiplicity of branches. This new biological sue- C855 is usually achieved at the biological expense of the older dominant group from which it sprang, or whose place it has usurped. Thus the rise of the placental mammals was correlated with the decline of the terres- trial reptiles, and the birds replaced the pterosaurs as dominant in the air. Occasionally, however, when the breakthrough to a new type of organization is also a breakthrough into a wholly new environment, the new type may not come into competition with the 01d, and both may continue to coexist in full nourishment. Thus the evolution of land vertebrates in no way interfered with the continued success of the seals dominant group, the teleost bony fish. The successive patterns of successful organization are stable patterns: they exemplify continuity, and tend to persist over long periods. Reptiles have re- mained reptiles fer a quarter of a billion years: tor- toises, snakes: lizards and crocodiles are alt still recog- nizably reptilian, all variations of one organizational theme. It is difficult for life to transcend this stability and achieve a new successful organization. That is why breakthrough to new dmninant types are so rareeand also so important The reptilian type radiated out into well over a dozen important groups or orders: but all of them remained within the reptilian framework ex- cept two: which broke through to the new and wonder- fully successful patterns of bird and mammal. In the early stages: a new group however successful it will eventually become, i5 few and feeble and shows no aigns 0f the success it may eventually achieve Its breakthmugh is not an instantaneous matter, but has to be lnll'JlCihEllthl by a series of improvements which eventually become welded into the new stabilized 0r- gamxation. With mammale, there was First hair, then milk, then partial and later full temperature regulation, then brief antl Finally prolonged internal development, with t-volutitm of a placenta. Mammals of a Small and insig- nificant son had existeti and evelved for 100 million years or 310 before they achieved a full breakthrough to their exploeive dominance in the Cenozoic Something very similar occurred during our OWn breakthrough from mammalian t0 psychosocial organi- zation. Our prehuman ape ancestors were never partic ularly successtul or abundant. For their transformation into man a series of steps were needed. Descent from the trees: erect posture; some enlargement of brain; more carnivorous habits; the use and then the making of tools; further enlargement of brain; the discovery 01' fire; trtte speech and language; elaboration of tools and rituals. These steps took the better part of half a mii- lion years: it was not until lees than a hundred thousand years ago that man could begin to deserve the title of dominant type, and not till less than 10,000 years ago that he became fully dominant. After manis emergence as truly man, this same sort of thing continued to happen, but with an important difference. Mani; CVolution is not biological but psycho, social: it operates by the mechanism of cultural tradi- tion, which involves the cumulative self-reproduetion and seif-variation of mental activities and its products. Accordingly, major steps in the human phase of evolu- tion are achieved by breakthroughs to new dominant patterns of mental organization, of knowledge. ideas and beiiefs-ideoiogical instead of physiological or bio- logical organization. There is a succession of successfui idearsystems in- stead of a succession of successful bodiiy organizations. Each new successful idea-system spreads and dominates same important sector of the world, until it is super- seded by a rivai system, 01' itself gives birth to its suc- cessor by a breakthrough to a new organization system of thought and belief, We need only think of the magic pattern of tribal thought, the god-centered medieval pattern organized round the concept of divine authority and revelation, and the rise in the last three centuries of the science-centered patternJ organized round the cone cept of human progress, but progresg somehow under the control of supernatural Authority In 1359, Darwin opened the door to a new pattern of ideological organi- zationethe evolution-centered organization of thought and belief. Through the telescope of our scientific imagination, we can discern the existence of this new and improved ideological organization; but its details are not clear, and we can also see that the necessary steps upward to- ward it are many and hard to take. Let me change the metaphor. To those who did not deliberateiy shut their eyes, or who were not allowed to look, it was at once clear that the fact and concept of evolution was bound to act as the central germ or living template of a new dominant thought-organization. And in the century since The Origin of Species, there have been many attempts to understand the implications of evolution in many fields, from the affairs of the Stellar universe to the affairs of men, and to integrate the facts of evolution and our knowledge of its processes into the overall organization of our general thought. All dominant thought-organizations are cancerned with the ultimate as well as with the immediate prob- lems of existence: or: I should rather say, with the most ultimate problems that the thought of the time is capa- ble oi envisaging or even formulating. They are all con- cerned with giving some interpretation of man, of the world which he is to live in, and of his place and role in that woridein other words some comprehensible pic- ture of human destiny and significance. The broad outlines of the new evolutionary picture of ultimates are beginning to be clearly visible. Man's destiny is to be the sole agent for the future evolution of this planet. He is the highest dominant type to be produced by over two and a half billion years of the 530w biological improvement effected by the blind 0p- portunistic workings of natural selection; if he does not destroy himself, he has at least an equal stretch of evolutionary time before him to exercise his agency. 43 During the later part of biological evolution, minds our word for the mental activities and properties of or- ganismsbemerged with greater clarity and intensity, and came 10 play a more important role in the individ- ual lives of animals. Eventually it broke through, to be- come the basis for further evolution, though the charac- ter of evolution now became cultural instead of genetic or biological. It was to this breakthrough, brought about by the automatic mechanism of natural selection and not by any conscious effort on his own part, that man owed his dominant evolutionary position. Man therefore is of immense significance. He has been ousted from his self-imagined centrality in the universe to an infinitesimal location in a peripheral po- sition in one of a million of galaxies. Nor, it would ape peer; is he likely to be unique as a sentient being. On the other hand, the evolution of mind or sentiency is an extremely rare event in the vast meaninglessness of the insentient universe, and manls particular brand of senti- ency may well be unique. But in any case he is highly signihcant. He is a reminder of the existence, here and there, in the quantitative vastness of cosmic matter and its energy equivalents, of a trend towards mind, with its accompaniment of quality and richness of existence; and, what is more, a proof of the importance of mind and quality in the alivembracing evolutionary process. It is only through possessing a mind that he has be- come the dominant portion of this planet and the agent responsible for its future evolution; and it will only be by the right use of that mind that he will be able to exercise that responsibility rightly. He could all too readily be a failure in the job; he will only succeed if he faces it consciously and if he uses all his mental re- sourees-knowledge and reason, imagination, sensitiv- ity and moral effort. And he must face it unaided by outside help. In the evolutionary pattern of thought there is no longer either need or room for the supernatural. The earth was not created: it evolved. So did all the animals and plants that inhabit it, including our human selves, mind and soul as well as brain and body. So did religion. Religions are organs of psychosocial man concerned with human destiny and with experiences of sacredness and tran- seendence. In their evolution, some tbut by no means alll have given birth to the concept of gods as super- natural beings endowed with mental and spiritual prop- erties and capable of intervening in the affairs of nature, including man They are organizations of human thought in its interaction with the puzzling, cemplex world with which it has to contend-the outer world of nature and the inner world of manis own nature. In this, they resemble other early organizations of human thought confronted with nature, like the doctrine of the Four Elements, Earth, Air, Fire and Water, or the Eastern concept of rebirth and reincarnation. Like these, they are destined to disappear in competition with other. truer, and more embracing thought-organi- zations which are handling the same range of raw or processed experience. Evolutionary man can no longer take refuge from his loneliness creeping for shelter into the arms of a divi- nized father-thure whom he has himself created, nor escape from the responsibility of making decisions by sheltering under the umbrella of Divine Authority, 1101' absolve himself from the hard task of meeting his pres- ent problems and planning his future by relying on the will of an omniscient but unfortunately inscrutable Providence. On the other hand, his loneliness is only apparent. He is not alone as a type. Thanks to the astronomers, he now knows that he is one among the many organisms that bear witness to the trend towards sentience, mind and richness of being: operating so wisely but so sparse- ly in the cosmos. More important, thanks to Darwin, he now knows that he is not an isolated phenomenon, cut off from the rest of nature by his uniqueness. Not only is he made of the same matter and operated by the same energy as all the rest of the cosmos, but for all his dis- tinctiveness, he is linked by genetic continuity with all the other living inhabitants of his planet. Animals, plants and micro-erganisms, they are all his cousins or remote: kin, all parts of one single evolving how of metabolizing protoplasm. Nor is be individually aloneJ in his thinking. He exists and has his being, in the intangible sea of thought which Teilhard de Chardin has christened the no- esphere there are, for his taking, the daring speculations and aspiring ideals of man long dead, the organized knowledge of science, the hoary wisdom of the ancients, the creative imaginings of all the worldls poets and artists. And in his own nature there are, waiting to be called upon, an array of potential helperseall the pos- sibilities of wonder and kn0wledge, of delight and rev- erence, of creative belief and moral purpose, of passion- ate effort and embracing love. Turning the eye of an evolutionary biologist 0n the situation, I would compare the present stage of evolv- ing man to the geological moment, some three hundred million years ago, when our amphibian ancestors were just establishing themselves out of the world of water. They had created a bridgehead into a wholly new en- vironment-no longer buoyed up by water, they had to learn how to support their own weight; debarrecl from swimming with the muscular tail; they had to learn to crawl with clumsy limbs The newly discovered realm of air gave them direct access to the oxygen they needed to breathe, but it also threatened their moist bodies with desiccation. And though they managed to make do on land during their adult lives, they found themselves still compulsorily fishy during the early stages of their life. On the other hand, they had emerged into completely new freedom. As fish, they had been conflned below a bounding surface. Now the air above them expanded out into the infinity of space. Now they were free of the banquet of small creatures prepared by the previous hundred billion years of lifels terrestrial evolution. The earthts land surface provided a greater variety of opporu tunity than did its waters, and above all a much greater range of challenge to evolving life. Could the early Stegoeephalians have been gifted with imagination, they might have seen before them the possibility of walkingJ running, perhaps even flying over the earth; the probability of their descendants escaping from bondage to winter cold by regulating their temperature, escaping from bondage to the waters by constructing private ponds for their early development; the inevita- bility of an upsurge of their dim minds to new levels of clarity and performance. But meanwhile they would see themselves tied to an ambiguous existence, neither one thing nor the other, on the narrow moist margin be- tween water and air. They could have seen the promised land afar off, though but dimly through their bleary newtish eyes. But they would also have seen that, to reach it, they would have to achieve many difficult and arduous transformations of their being and way of life. So with ourselves. We have only recently emerged from the biological to the psychosocial area of evolu- tion, from the earthy biosphere into the freedom of the notjsphere. Do not let us forget how recently: we have been truly men for perhaps a tenth of a million yearseone tick of evolutionls clock: even as protoumen, we have existed for under one million years-Fless than a twoethousandth fraction of evolutionary time. No longer supported and steered by a framework of in- stincts, we try to use our conscious thoughts and pure poses as organs of psychosodal Ioeomotion and direc- tion through the tangles of our existence; but so far with only moderate success, and with the production of much evil and horror as well as of some beauty and glory of achievement. We too have colonized only an ambiguous margin between an old bounded environ- ment and the new territories of freedom. Our feet still drag in the bielogical mud, even when we lift our heads into the conscious air. But unlike those remote ancesr tors of ours, we can truly see Something of the promised land beyond. We can do so with the aid 01' our new in- strument of visionwur rational, knowledge-based imagination. Like the earliest prerGalilean telescopes, it is still a very primitive instrument, and gives a feeble and often distorted view. But, like the early telescopes, it is; capable of immense improvement, and could reveal many secrets of our noespherie home and destiny. Meanwhile n0 mental telescope is required to see the immediate evolutionary landscape, and the frightening j'iroblems which inhabit it All that is needed-but that is plenty-gis for us; to cease being intellectual and moral OStricheS, and take our heads out of the sand of wilful blindness. If we do so, we Shall soon see that the alarm- ing problems are twovlaced, and are also stimulating challengest What are those alarming monsters in our evolution- ary path? I would list them as follows. The threat of super-scientiflc war, nuclear, chemical, and biological; the threat of over-population; the rise and appeal Of Communist ideology, eSpecially in the under-privileged sectors of the worldls people; the failure to bring Chiha: with nearly a quarter of the worlds population, into the world organization of the United Nations; the erosion of the worldls cultural variety; our general preoccupa- tion with means rather than ends: with technology and quantity rather than creativity and quality; and the Revolution of Expectation: caused by the widening gap between the haves and the have-nots, between the rich and the poor nations. Today is Thanksgiving Day. But millions of people, now living, have little cause to give thanks for anything. When I was in India this spring, a Hindu man was arrested for the murder of his small son. He explained that his life was so miserable that he had killed the boy as a sacrifice to the goddess Kali, in the hope that she would help him in return. That is an extreme case, but let us remember that two-thircls of the worldls people are uncler-privilegediunder-fed, under-healthy, under- educatedeand that millions of them live in squalor and suffering They have little t0 be thankful for save hope that they will be helped to eseape from this misery. If we in the West do not give them aid, they will look to other systems for helpgor even turn from hope to de- structive despair. We attempt to deal with these problems piecemeal, often half-heartedly; sometimes, as with population, we refuse to recognize it offlcially a3 a World Problem tjust as we refuse to recognize Communist China. as a World Powerl. In reality, they are not separate monsters to be dealt with by a series of separate ventures, however heroic 0r saintly. They are all symptoms of a new evolutionary situation; and this can only be successfully met in the light and with the aid of a new organization of thought and belief, a new dominant pattern of ideas. It is hard to break through the firm framework of an accepted belief-system, and build new and complex suc- eessora, but it is necessary. It is necessary to organize our ffd her ideas and scattered values into a unitive pat- tern, transcending conflictq and divisions in its unitary web. Only by such a reconciliation of opposites and disparates can our belief-system release us from inner conflicts: only so can we gain that peaceful assurance which will help unlock our energies for development in strenuous practical action. Somehow or other we must make our new pattern of thinking evolution-centered. It ean give us asauranee by reminding us of our long evolutionary rise: how this was also, strangely and wonderfully, the rise of mind; and how that rise culminated in the eruption of mind as the dominant factor in evolution and led to our own spectacular but precarious evolutionary success. It can give us hope by pointing to the cons of evolutionary time that lie ahead of our epecies if it does not destroy itself or damage its own chances; by recalling how the increase of mania understanding and the improved or- ganization of knowledge has in fact enabled him to make a whole series of advancesy such as control of in- fectious disease or efficiency oi telecommunication, and to transcend a whole set of apparently unbridgeable 013' positions, like the conilict between Islam and Christen- dom, or that between the seven kingdoms of the Hep- tarehy; and by reminding us of the vast stores of hu- man possibilityeof intelligence, imagination, coopera- tive goodwillewhich still remain untapped. Our new organization of thoughtibeliefrsystem, framework of values, ideology, call it what you wille must grow and be developed in the light of our new evolutionary vision. So, in the first place, it must of course itself be evolutionary. That is to saye-mit must help us to think in terms of an overriding process of change, development, and possible improvement, to have our eyes 011 the future rather than on the past, to find support in the growing body of our knowledge, not in fixed dogma or ancient authority. Equally, of course, the evolutionary outlook must be seientihc, not in the sense that it rejects or neglects other human activities, but in believing in the value of the scientific method for eliciting knowledge from ignorance and truth irom error and basing itself on the firm ground of scientifi- cally established knowledge. Unlike most theologies, it accepts the inevitability and indeed the desirability of change, and advances by welcoming new discovery even when it conflicts with old ways of thinking. The only way in which the present split between reli- gion and science could be mended would be through the eeceptance by science of the fact and value of religion as an organ of evolving man, and the acceptance by religion that religions do and must evolve. Next, the evolutionary outlook must be global. Man is strong and successful in so far as he operates in inter-thinking groups, which are able to pool their knowledge and beliefs. To have any success in fulfilling his destiny as the controller or agent of future evolution on earth, he must become one single intetwthinking group, with one general framework of ideas: otherwise his mental energies will be dissipated in ideological con: Hict. Science gives us a foretaste of what could be. It is already global, with scientists of every nation contrib- uting to its advance: and because it is global, it is ad- vaneing fast. In every held, we must aim to transcend nationalism: and the First step towards this is to think globallyehow could this or that task be achieved by in- ternational cooperation rather than by separate action? But our thinking must also be concerned with the in tiivititlal. 'l'he WPll-dEVClODEt'l well-patterned individual human being is, in a strictly scientific sense, the highest phenomenon of which we have any knowledge; and the variety of individual personalities is the worldls highest richness. 47 In the light of the evolutionary Vision the individual need not feel just a meaningless cog in the seciai ma- chine. nor merely the helpless prey and sport of vast impersonal forces. He can do something to develop his own personality, to discover his own talent possibilities, to interact personally and fruitfully with other individ- uals. He has assurance of his owu significance. If so, in his own person he is effecting an important realization of evolutionary possibility: he is contributing his owri significance in the waster and more enduring whole of which he is a part. I Spoke of quaiity. This must be the dominant con- cept of our belief-systemequality and richness as against quantity and uniformity. Though our new idea-pattern must be unitary, it need not and should not impose a drab or boring cul- tural uniformity. An organized system, whether of thought, expression, social life or anything else, has both unity and richness. Cultural variety, both in the world as a whole and within its separate countries, is the spice of life. Yet it is being threatened and indeed eroded away by inass-production, mass-communica- tions, mass conformity, and all the Other forces making for uniformizationean ugly word for an ugly thingi We have to work hard to preserve and foster it. One sphere where individual variety could and should be encouraged is education. In many school systems, under the pretext of so-called democratic equality, vari4 ety of gifts and capacity is now actually being discour- aged. The duller children become frustrated by being rushed too fast, the brighter become frustrated by being held back and bored. Our new idea-system must jettison the democratic myth of equality. Human being are not born equal in gifts or potentialities, and human progreSS steps largely from the very fact of their inequality. KTree but im- equaliI should be our motto, and diversity of excellence, not conforming normalcy or mere adjustment, should be the aim of education. Population is people in the mass; and it is in regard to pepulation that the most drastic reversal or reorienta- tion of our thinking has become necessary. The unpre- cedented populationuexplosion 0f the last half-Century has strikingly exemplihed the Marxist principle of the passage of quantity into quality. Mere increase in quane tity of people is increasingly affecting the quality of their lives, and affecting it almost wholly for the worse. Population-increase is already destroying or eroding many of the world's resources, both those for material subsistence and those-equally essential but often neg- lectedefor human enjoyment and fulfillment. Early in manis history the injunction to increase and multiply was right. Today it is wrong, and to obey it will be 48 disastrous. The Western World, and the United States in particular, has to achieve the difficult task of revers- ing the direction of its thought about population. It has to begin thinking that we should aim not at increase but at decreaseucertainly and quickly decrease in the rate of population-growth; and in the long run equally cer- tainly, decrease in the absolute number of people in the world, including our own countries. The spectacle of explosive populatiOn-increase is prompting us to ask the simple but basic: question, what are people. for? And we see that the answer has some- thing to do with their quality as human beings, and the quality of their lives and achievements. We must make the same reversal of ideas about our economic system. At the moment tand again I take the United States as most representativeJ our Western eco- nomic system twhich is invading new regionsl is based on expanding production for profit, and production for proht is based on expanding consumption. As one writer has put it, the American economy depends on persuading more people to believe that they want to consume more products. But, like the population-explosion, this consumption- explosien cannot continue much longer; it is an inher- ently self-defeating process. Sooner rather than later we must get away from a system based on artificially increasing the number of human wants, and set about constructing one aimed at the qualitative satisfaction of real human needs, Spiritual and mental as well as mate- rial and physiological. This means abandoning the pernicious habit of evalu- ating every human project solely in terms of its utility eby which the evaluators mean solely its material util- ity, and eslaecially its utility in making a profit for somebody. Once we truly believe tand true belief, however nec- essary, is rarely easyJ once we truly believe that manis destiny is to make possible greater fulfilment for more human beings and fuller achievement by human soci- eties, utility in the customary sense becomes subordi- nate. Quantity of material production is, of course, nec- essary as the basis for the satisfaction of elementary human needsebut only up to a certain degree. More than a certain number of calories or cocktails or T.V. sets or washing machines per person, is not merely un- necessary but bad. Quantity of material production is a means to a futher end, not an end in itself. The important ends of manis life include the creation and enjoyment of beauty, both natural and man-made; increased comprehension and a more assured sense of signihcance: the preservation of all sources of pure wonder and delight, like fine scenery, wild animals in freedom, or unspoiled nature; the attainment of inner peace and harmony; the feeling of active participation in embracing and enduring projects, including the cos- mic project of evolution. It is through such things that individuals attain greater fulfilment. As for nations and societies, they are remembered not for their wealth or comforts 0r techmalogiesJ but for their great buildings and works of art: their achieve- ments in science or law or political philosophy, their success in liberating human thought from the shackles of fear and ignorance. Although it is to his mind that man owes both his present dominant position in evolution, and any ad- vances he may have made during his tenure of that position, he is still strangely ignorant and even super- stitious about it. The exploration of the mind has bare- ly begun. It must be one of the main tasks of the com- ing era, just as was the exploration of the worldis sur- face a few centuries ago. Psychological exploration will doubtless reveal as many surprises as did geographical exploration, and will make available to our descendents all kinds of new possibilities of full and richer living. Finally, the evolutionary vision is enabling us to dis- cerni however incompletely, the lineaments oi the new religion that we can be sure will arise to serve the needs of the coming era. Just as stomachs are bodily organs concerned with digestionJ and involving the biochemical activity at special juices, so are religions psychosocial organs concerned with the problems of human destiny, and involving the emotion of sacredness and the sense of right and wrong. Religion of some sort is probably necessary. But it is not necessary a good thing. It was not a good thing when the Hindu I read about this spring killed his son as a religious sacrifice. It is not a good thing that religious pressure has made it illegal to teach evolution in Tennessee, because it conflicts with Fundamentalist beliefs. It is not a good thing that in Connecticut and Massachusetts women should be sub- ject to grievous suffering because Roman Catholic pres- sure refuses to allow even doctors to give information 011 birth-Control even to non-Catholics. It was not a good thing for Christians to persecute and even burn heretics; it is not a good thing when Communism, in its dogmatic-religious aspect, persecutes and even executes deviationists. The emergent religion of the near future could be a good thing. It will believe in knowledge. It will be able to take advantage of the vast amount of new knowledge produced by the knowledge-explosion 0f the last few centuries in constructing what we call its theologyu- the framework of facts and ideas which provide it with intellectual support: it should be able, with our in- creased knowledge of mind, to define our sense of right and wrong more clearly so as to provide a better moral support, and to focus the feeling of sacredness on fitter objects. Instead of worshipping supernatural rulers, it will sanctify the higher manifestations of human nature, in art and love, in intellectual comprehension and aspiring adoration1 and will emphasize the fuller realization of lifels pessibilities as a sacred trust. Thus the evolutionary vision, f1rst opened up for us by Charles Darwin a century back, illuminates our existence in a simple but almost overwhelming way. It exemplifies the truth that truth is great and will prevail, and the greater truth that truth will set us free. Evolu- tionary truth frees us from subservient fear of the un- known and supernatural, and exhorts us to face this new freedom with courage tempered with wisdom, and hope tempered with knowledge. It ShOWS our destiny and our duty. It shows us mind enthroned above mat- ter? quantity subordinate to quality. It gives our anxious minds support by revealing the incredible pos- sibilities that have already been realized in evolutionis past; and, by pointing to the hidden treasure of fresh possibilities that could be realized in the future, it gives us a potent incentive for fulfilling out evolutionary role. 49 Bill Veeck, owner of the Chicago White Sex, gave a talk on the baseball business to prospec- tive basebali stars and czars. A frequent campus visitor is ScnatOr Paul H. Douglas. This formcr UC economics professior dropped in on the Darwin festivities and, at another time, gave a talk on lhl: ncw labor legislation. Visitors to the University include politicians, Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain leci tured on Auguste Comte. EnglancPS most famous counter-tenor. Alfred Deller, gave a performance, with trio, as part of the University Concert Series. Elizabeth H, world traveler, Queen, and non- partisan, whisked through the campus on her tour of Canadm the St, Lawrence River, the Great Lakes, and Chicago. Xx. Dag Hammarskjoid, Secretary-General of the United Nations, Earl Warren, US Supreme Court Chief justice, and Nelson Rockefeller. Governor 0! New York, participated in UCS observance of Law Day in May. Hammarskiold spake in the auditorium of the new Iaw buildings and Rockefeller in the Chapel buiit by a relation philosophers, counter-tenors, queens john Crows Ransom. poet and critic, was one of the speakers in Dean Simpson's My Life and Yours program. Other visitors in these informal discussions were actor Morris Car- nm'sky, editor Irving Kristel, Senator Wili liam Benton, and the British Iegal expert, Lord Dcnning. Adlai Stevenson, worid traveler, ex-Governor, and Democrat, helped celebrate the Darwin Centennial. In May, he spoke bcforc the con- ference on world tensions. Richard Nixon, world traveler, Vice-Fresident, and Republican. heiped dedicate the new law buildings. Entire cast joins applause 35 authnr Alec Sutherland steps from wings to take his b u.-'. The Quadrangle Club burlesques uKing Lear Rnbvrt Ashenhurst, $ch Sutherland. and Ruth Nell 'riun, con 0; ut :ur and in tor respectwcly gather to c: .nrdinate aif tics. The final scene, with full cast and W Barrett Blakemore as Lear, viewed from a stage hand's point of View. in The 1960 Revels, uSouth Side Story Lee Wilcox shovs the audience a p?.eaaant voice and a goid sequined bathing suit as a part of her number. A new university slogan was utilized by Hal Haydon as part of his set design The student and his activities From Faculty Revels we break smoothly into student activities, not meaning to insinuate song and dance are students main occupations, but there do exist activities in which students take part, besides their academic work, that embody those particular actions and are known as nstudent activities.H This is a misnomer. If an attempt were made to accurately depict studerit life, the result would betray the symptoms of mental disorder. We donlt imply that the average undergraduate is sick, but the paces through which he must put himself in satisfy- ing his instructors and his own simple lusts, would out- wardly indicate a mad mixture of frenzy, frustration and exultation. A studentls life often consists of rushing to meetings with advisers, trying to register or Change a course, spending long hours talking while inwardly berating himself for not studying, getting hung up reading mar terial unnecessary to his studies, doing little things ne- cessary to maintain the esteem of people he likes and the little things necessary to antagonize those he doesnlt like. Added to this are trips to Student Health over a mix-up in names, for example, when someone with a similar last name cmnes down with a cold. Besides the other bothers and frustrations of a time consuming na- ture, there are the hours spent not only in studying, but trying to get in a mood to study. All in all, a picture of student life would be one which only a manic-depressive schizophrene could appreciate. The student activities represented in the following section, however, will be those which are extra-curricu- Iar. Sometimes these affairs are a relief from the com- petition and harassment of the classroom, a place where the embryonic scholar may compete on an unimportant level, and sometimes they seem to be a substitute. The preceeding anthropological view of student aeti- vlties and student life was inteuded to lead into a Pla- tonic system by which this section of Cap tmd Gown could be organized. The system adequately included all registered student activities and some of the mere sur- repitious ones. Unfortunately, it showed Student Gov- ernment to be the ultimate in student activities and we were forced to abandon Plato. No other scheme could be found that Would include everything to be covered, so we decided to let one thing follow another, and once having begun, tumble on through to the end. Since the arrangement of this section is determined purely by whim and chance, the searcher for complex underlying structure is warned not to look too hard or long for that which does not exist. 01 U1 Student activities at Chicage are generally superior to their counterparts on other campuses. One of the cri- teria by which student activities might be judged is the amount of importance attached to them. This reaches a culmination in those that are just vestiges of former or- ganizations or images of groups at sister institutions. Cap and Gown is probably the most notable example. Another criteria for judging student activities is their level and variety. In this there are two important con- siderations; the system under which they are runJ and the size of the mother institution. Many groups at vari- ous schools are run as adjuncts to the curriculum, that is, participants are given credit toward a degree. Obvi- ously this gives the student more time to spend on his work in the organization and to that extent raises its natteti-Qgg 7. tin . . 'hemia-qsisru. level of performance. Also, more students will take part in an activity if, because of their participation, they re- ceive credit toward a degree; therefore the total work done on any project is greater, and the ofhcers or faculty members of the body are able to exercise greater selecv tivity in choosing a staff. Both tend to raise the quality of the production or product. Size of institution also af- fects the number of students working on any extra-curri- cular activity, in turn affecting the labor expended on any endeavor and the selection of a staff. This leads to probably the finest aspect of Chicago style student activities: they are all student run. tEXr cept, of course, for departmental clubs, whose purpose is to increase communication between faculty and stu- dents in the departmentJ The organizations are a direct reiiection of the variety of interest of the mean student and his ability within the limitations of time. A second important aspect of student organizations at Chicago is their variety and general high level of quality. They range from the Documentary Film Group to University Theatre to the Junior Math Ciub. In these and many others, ievel of performance and degree of originality seem to be higher than that of their cousins. Compare Phoenix to its counterparts and only one conclusion can be reached. The Folklore Society, if not unique, is cer- tainly most unusual. The listing could go 0111 but these instances are typical. Student activities are aproduct 0f the school, not only in their affiliation, but of that which the school is and inspires in its students. The University of Chicago may not be the greatest university in the world, but without doubt, something exists besides the intelligence of its students or excellence of its staff, be it called spirit or something else, that found its birth in the 01d College. It consists, in part, of an independence of hackneyed forms and a. dislike of triteness and corn. One result is Experie mentation in new ideas and areas of interest, which the permissive attitude of the administration has encouraged to a great degree. The present high level of quality of student activities can be preserved and raised if they are nurtured without being made meretricious, if they are left to mirror stu- dent interest and not forced into a stereotype, and if no incentive is given their members to become campus iisn- eietyfi Student activities can be tend are here, we be- lievei a valuable appendage oi the curriculum, providing a release for individual creativity, and replacing state school type courses such as basketweaving 101. They can provide a freid of wide experimentation for students who are undecided over which department to enter or what career pursue. In short, student activities need not be a synonym of inane, but can and should be a valuable addition to a university's facilities for providing an edu- cation. 57 Subject under discussion: The Method of 1, Kant Debaters: Harvey Flaumenhaft C013 bench arm Al Leong Um bench scan Main kibitzers: Leon Kass Patricia Korenvaes 58 c1 sidewalk discussion A new director and enforced infiltration of music Thm-c were somc changes in the music groups this year due to the increased interest and iniiucnce of the music department. For the fnsi time the conductor of the Glee Club and Orchestra is on the music faculty; for lht' first time music students are required to participate in Lhe groups 60 students Glee Club rehearsed Tuesday nights in Ida Noyes auditorium, presented concerts in Winv ter and Spring quarters. bring the Glee Club . . . Soprano Connie Carncs Susan Flatt Sue Frcis Marianna Tax Rea Ginsberg Ruth Jackson Frances McNiel Elizabeth Glen Ann Otto Tmor Gerald Fang Elizabeth Guioe Anne Meyer Steve Sittler Isaac Wright Am Judy Jo Miller Aimee Hayes Joan Fromm Jean Koch Linda Herman Brenda Spatt Mam Elle: Bass Jan Berkhout Rick Prairie Arthur Meinzer Ned Sudborough Joseph Sittler Walter Damn Sherwood Parker Charles Joslyn 61 and the Orchestra New on campus this war is H. Colin Slim director of lhe Univc ty hchcstra and 6le Club. Mt. Slim, inh' was asustant director m the Harvard Univ y Glee Club while st . ing there. teaches counterpoint and history '31 music in the Music Department. Early in the winter quarter the orchestra spon- sored a concerto contest. winners of which would perform with the orchestra in concert. William Spady abova played the Hadyn Con- certo for Trumpet and Orchestra at the Winter concert. Co-winner Arthur Solomon played the Mendelssohn Violin Concerto at the Spring concert. greater potential, higher quality, and larger audiences First Viafz'n Ivan Scllin, Concertmaster David Perin Arthur Solomon Arthur Fayer Katherine Kiblinger Ruth Bialosky William Sloan Rochelle Feldman Jeffery Kranzler Jennie Riesman Elliott Gaver Joseph Olive Second Violin Glenda Hawa Mary Finkle Martin Kain Laura Wick Stuart Wright Marvin Bikman Elliott Krick Emily Schmidt Roberta, Reader Edward Album Susan Strodthofi Kenneth Kurzcja. Viola Marilyn Wargo Peter Zvengrowski Norma Kruskal Alice Kurs Violoncelio Richard Ossius Helen Gill Lisa Lisco Franz Schneider Virginia, Spaeth Jerry Gold Ems Violin Nancy Green Sheldon Stolowich Easley Blackwood Piccolo Lenore Coral Flute Tomlin Stevens Benjamin Muckenhaupt Lenore Coral Tritmpet William Spady Stephen Fortgang James Hood William Collins Trombone Peter Olson Richard Mintel Verdean Brane Gilbert Kimura Oboe Marta Weinstock Nicholas Ashford Dan Hoffman Clarinet Robert Hammatt Andrew Klein Daniel Rosenblum Bax: Clarinet Carolyn Fine Tuba Joseph Olive Tinwani Gordon Burghardt Ivan Komar Percussion Easlcy Blackwood Ivan Komar Rnbert McMahan Bassoon Michael Rosenblum Richard Atkinson Joel Eigen French H om Robert Brown Donald Barnett Joseph Sittler Roger Downey Ronald Shapiro Maurice Grice 63 Folklore Society, largest student group, Part of Folklore Society's membership gathers in Reynolds Club lounge for an evening of folk songs. Girl, guy. and guitar cngitate on a folk. song's significance. Two is company, but Fulklorists prefer a crowd so they sponsor frei quent hnoLenannies hrariety performanccw and wing dings uverybody sinzn during the year makes campus ring with singin and strummin' Duets ave fine, provided folkEm-ists can agree Of course not everyone is gregarious, but in whose guitar is in lune. general folklorists are a pretty sociable bunch. The bell ringers, usually perched more noisily in Mitchell Tower, per- form here cu man? with lesser hells under the direction 0i James R. Lawson. In smaller groups UCTers communicate with recorders, bells, Recorder Society, a group of students interested in music 01 the rcnaissancc and especially in recorders, gather frequently during the year and give occasional performances. 66 soxophones The jazz duh hoids sessions regularly in Reyn- old's Club and Ida Noyce HaIL Shown here are Rusty Allen, trumpet, Warren Bernhardt, piano, Clyde Flowers, bass, and Bill Walsh, drums. . 4mm , . Dick D'Anjou, L'T's technical director, angles in on the Mandel Hall stage. Glenna Ross as Natasha Federovna quizzes Steve McDermott whom she believes to be her dead nephew. University Theatre uses ingenuity in presentation Director Marvin Phillips demonstrates coffin liiting technique to Ken Atkatz Cm peasant ker- chieD while disinterested Bob Raiser struggles to remember lines. The cast and crew of Pepel in one place. 68 The Charles H. Sergel Drama Prize is a one thousand dellar biennial prize awarded the best original play sub- mitted to the contest. This year, due t0 the unusually high quaiity of the plays, a third prize of five hun- dred dollars was added, In the final tabulation James D'Amicots HPepeIhThe Unburied Russianh and Ber- nard Sahlinls l The Puppetn shared the hrst prize while William O. Sachlerts UYellow LovesH placed third. Of the three winners, two, UPepelU and KiSLJKE-Ilow Loves? have been performed by University Theatre while the third, ttThe Puppetai is scheduled for a London presen- tation. A Brittany flsherman keeps a lonely vigil as the flrst act opens, of award winning original dramas Quietly reading poetry, Abbie Sheldon. as Mar- celle, awaits her lover. Stephen McDermott and Jeff Choinard hold an animated conversation during one of their stage Friends and enemies gather around Corhierre's encounters as Tristan CorbiErrt and a French death bed as the fifteen minute scene comes to officer. respectively. an end. Three different upDFOBChCS to acting are parlrayed by Robert Lamb, Anne Folke and john Dietmann. Students run the show Aldrich Amcs combines three elements of Uni- versity Theatreislcep, study. and 5it in this backstaac shot, Neal Johnston, co-editor of the Maroon, pun- ders a blocking sequence in Cocteau's three- act play, I '?'1'1':' Infernal Bajialchirief1 Sheryl Kaye; matches the shirt wiLh an actor she has to costume for the one-acts, Charlotte Stendahl, veteran of Court and Uni- versity Theatre, tries her hand at directing: gong of Songs. in UT s Tonight at 8:30 series Scenes from Othello. Love for Love, and Francesca da Rimini Shawing tense moments from each of the shows. The flrst two are crowd scenes, always tense situations 0n CourHs tiny stage, whiie the last shows joe McAuliffe reputed to have been one of the best actors of the season courts Shakespeare, Congreve, cmd Boker Andrew Duncan takes a break during rehearsal 01' Love for Love to lislcn to director William Bezdck's notes. Duncan also directed Othello for the Court and pIayed the part of Iago. 73 74 Warm spring days at Devil's Lake, Wisconsin, beckon rock climbing members of the Outing Club The Outing Club sponsors three or four week, end trips every quarter for the more adven- tumus students. Lately, speiunking expeditions Rave explorationg have become popular. lb Arriving at their destination in the Arapahoe country of Colorado, some of these Outing Club members await their first trip on skis down long, gentle 5105381 Outing Club outs Canoeing, a popular sport even in Jackson Park, seems especially inviting in Ontario, Canada. Student Union's Hangout Auctioneer Jim Best attempts to palm off an old poster being held by Marg Schwartz and Alice Schaeffer as part of the sin-like activities engineered by autumn SU president Nancy Cox threme left, very smaID. and Night of Sin attract hoards Meanwhile. back at Student Union headquari ters, Dave Emin, Art Schneider, and Laurie Loibl scheme out new and better ways to de- tract students from studies. 77 78 Dave Frodin adds a. frill. The Washington Promenade: Run by Laurie Loibl, the prom was as gallant. as gay, and as glittery as ever. Selected from a Field of over 25 candidates by judges Mrs. Alan The winner: Dorothy Sue Fisher. Simpson. Miss Lylas Kayc. and Lennard Meyer, these seven fmaIisls in the Miss UC contest underwent the rigors of a campus eiection. Front Row: Patricia Mayes, Nancy Cox, Nancy McFadden. Second Row: judy jackson, Domthy Sue Fisher, Betty Middlebmoks, Martha Kingsbury. lights, fuxedos, queens jan Ziotow gives a cue. The Pro Nausea delivers. A highlight of the 1959 marathon was a dis- CuSSiOn of the writings of the heat generation. Thu: opponents were Paul Carroll, left, editor of Big Table, and Robert Lucid. right, of the Bug- lish staff. Harold Haydon, then Dean of the College, moderated. The marathons continue . . . Givcn the This-Is-Your-Lifc trcatment and a flaming cake during the must recent. marathom John Schuerman dc-oxidizcd the latter with a single Station Managerial huff. Program director john Kim in action. Shown relaxing during the station's second Consecutive eighth annual marathon are John Hartigan, chief announcer, Kerry Pataki, announcer, and shy Roger Downcy, chief record librarian, historian, coordinatnr, and star. and The quality grows, Among the innovations this year were on the spot broadcasts of home haskethall games. In the series, The qu College: an Inquiry, produced by Bob Levine, student paneis quizzed the heads of each of the college sections, 2::- amim-r Knox Hill, and fpictured heru Dean Man Simpson. At the Chanceltofs resignation press. conference. 82 At the Pan-Amezican games. but WUCB remains confined to the dorms ttA radio station can be a dangerous thing, capable of hurting the University greatly. I, as Dean of Students, must protect the University. Some professional must be directly responsible to my office.n Thus, John P. Nether- ton erected the latest obstacle to WUCBis going FM. In a slow process Over the last years WUCB has sought to build the quality of staff and programming to a point where administration doubts could be queiled and an FM license applied for. This year that point was reached. With universal consent and good wishes, the FCC was contacted and preparations were made for conversion. As a concession to student-administration communication a board of three faculty members and two administrators was set up to advise, but not to legis- late. In April, with the license and FM-dom within reach at last, station manager John Schuerman and program director John Kim were informed by Dean Netherton that they were amateurs, albeit tiin the good sense, and that running a station for a set number of hours every day of the year as WUCB has been doing requires, an FM, some degree of pro fessional management; it. . . there is not going to be a student-run FM station. The reaction from WUCB staff members was strongly negative. Kim resigned his post in protest, calling the requirement one of censorship and one contrary to the traditions of the University. The situation, at publica- tion, is one of disappointment and uncertainty; most people in the University community still can't hear WUCB, but negotiations continue. It has been customary for the Cap and Gown to designate 3. man or men of the year. Let these two then, John Schuerman and John Kim, receive that recognition this year--a commendation for a job that has bean difh- cult, long, and, perhaps, fruitlessebut well done. At the Darwin Centennial, 83 NSA, NDEA controversies mingle with local problems in Student Government SG's '59-'60 scoreboard ' In early December SG passed a resolution proposing that the University withdraw from the National De- fense Education act unless the loyalty oath and dis- claimer provisions are removed. Gail Paradise, chairman of the NSA-Academic Free- dom committee and author of the resolution claimed that U there is a danger that their meaning may be 6X4 panded through interpretation, 2i there is a danger that they will lead to more restrictive legislation, 3 it im- plies that a student is disloyal until he makes a positive statement expressing his loyalty, and 4i refusal to sign results in suspicion of disloyalty. ' In January 3, resolution that UC drop out Of the Na- tional Student Association tNSAl was defeated 698 to 27?. SG President Maureen Byers was, extremely pleased that the rate was so heavily in favor of NSA. At the same time, I am quite disappointed that the vote was no larger than 17$ per cent of the University? How- ever, anti-NSA spokesman Bill Hawkins stated, HI be- lieve that the lack of publicity for the anti-NSA position caused the result of this referendum. A majority of 2-1,- to 1 is not very great considering this lack of publicity? 0 In March SG voted to send $160 to students lined in Nashville, Tennessee, for disorderly conduct during a non-violent demonstration against racial discrimina- tion in Southern chain department stores. Paul Hotter tMedical Schooll made the proposal which required that SG send the $160 to pay for three $50 disorderly conduct fines imposed upon Negro students and the $10 fine of a white student. ' Still in discussion in the Executive Council at the Cap and Gown publication deadline are projects which would liberalize womenls hours in dorms and give li- brary privileges to full-time students during the regular academic year Who are in the city during the summer. Passed, but not yet realized, are plans which would extend the hours during which athletic facilities may be used by individuals and set up a student cooperative book service. The Student Faculty Relatious cornmittee is ready to begin the preparation of the faculty list for its Student-Faculty Seminars Program. The list will be published and interested students Will sign up for the seminar of their choice. The weekly seminars will be attended by eight to twelve students and will be held during the evening in the home of the faculty member. Each seminar will last for one quarter. 85 In the three key cases facing it, the Student-Faculty- Administratiorl Court dismissed two and gave a clear cut decision in the third. The Court dismissed one of the cases because it refused to deliver advisory deci- sions. It has yet to decide whether or not it will ever deliver an advisory decision. Brombt'a'g and Sadd versus Byers and Shelton. Does SG have the right to use funds for purposes other than those directly related to the welfare of UC students? Bruce Bromherg and William Sadd, Law School rep- resentatives to the Assembly, originally petitioned the Court to declare that the meeting at which the Assem- bly voted to pay the fmes of students arrested in Nash- ville, Tennessee, while participating in the ttsit-inli civil rights movement was not a legal meeting. They later amended their petition to include the contention that the expenditure itself was unconstitutional. The Court issued twu injunctions restraining Assembly president Maureen Byers and treasurer Ron Shelton from releas- ing the funds, and Dean of Students John P Netherton prohibited the Assembly from using funds t$150a from its budget. But the Court ruled ?-1 that 5G could send any money it raised on its own. Bromberg had argued that the constitutional previ- sion stating that uThe president or the Executive Counr cil may call a meeting providing notiflcation is sent to all members had been violated on two counts since the Assembly had called its own meeting and had not prop- erly notihed its members. Sadd declared that the reso- iution to pay the fmes was unconstitutional since spend- ing money eff campus violates the principle of the first clause of the Preamble 0f the Constitution: itIn order to further the interests and provide for the welfare of the students at the University of Chicago. Miss Byersy counsel, john Kim, answered that U the wording of the constitution Ctmay eallhy does not prohibit the Assembly from deciding the time of its meeting, 2J notihcation had been sent ta statement to that effect from the secretary of the Assembly, Betty WON. was produced t, 3 there were uother powers and duties of the Assembty't and that hit shall provide for its own financing and determine its budget? The Court decided unanimously that the Assembly had the right to call the meeting and declared the meet- ing vaiid in spite of the lack of any clear evidence on either side. It did, however, decide that Bromberg and Sadd were right in stating that notiheation must be sent and criticized 86 for its sloppy methods of noti- hcation. John Kim representing Student Government faces the Court: Donald Meiklejohn, faculty. Leon Kass. student, Margaret Perry, adminis- tration, and students Peter Langrock. Roger Bernhardt tchief jus- ticel, Phil Epstein, F. Jay Pepper, and Phil Hoffman. Faculty mem- ber Harry Kalven was absent at this session. Studentlocultyadministration Court The right 01 studem organizations :0 have speakers on campm without undue interference from the Student Activities Office. Can the Student Activities thce require or seem to require more information about the appearance of speakers on campus than the name of the speaker, the organization the speaker represents, and the campus organization sponsoring him? The majority opinion tS-ll delivered by Chief Jus- tice Roger Bernhardt was that ttthe petition must be dismissed for lack of a clear centroversytt since there was iir10 allegation that the Activities thce either has or intends to seek more information than the petition permits?! At the core of the decision was the majority belief that him a case such as this, where extremely deli- cate and serious problems of free speech are raised, it would be foolhardy to spell out hxed rights and limita- tions where there has been such a scarcity of antagonis- tic argument to guide our thinking? But Mr. Justice Kass dissented on the grounds that it was uthe obliga- tion of the Court to issue such judgments concerning the interpretation of any and all points of the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, etc? deliberates, decides, dismisses Immediate r2451: versus deferred rush in the fraternity system. IS the choice between immediate and deferred rush in the fraternity system a matter wholly internal to the fraternity system 01' is it University-wide in scope? The S-F-A court in a unanimous decision threw out $05 petition for a ruling on the constitutionality of its proposed amendment to the Student Code governing fra- ternity pledging. The Assembly contended that the Stu- dent Code could be amended in such a way as to decide the issue of deferred versus immediate rush. The pro- posed act, whose constitutionality the Court was asked to rule upon, would prohibit fraternities from changing the present system of rushing hrst year students in the winter quarter to one in which they would be rushed in the fall quarter. I-F council submitted a petition asking the Court to dismiss the SG petition without an advisory decision, one of their arguments being that the amendment must be passed before being brought to court. SwaAE disw missal was in fact based on the gmunds that no leng lation had been passed and therefore any advice given by the Court could be used in a political way if the bill were again presented. 87 Max Schactman. prominent socialist leader, seems to hr: looking through invisible glass dur- ing a talk. sponsored by Young PcopleE SD- cialist League KYPSU and University Young Socialists KUYS American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mar- shal! Patner scorns lcctcrn, 5its down during talk on brutaiily in the Chicago police force. The lecture was sponsored by the Student Rep- resentative Party GRPJ, lnitiaI-conscious political groups hear speakers, 88 stage demonstrations UC students put down books and pick up posters in a. campaign against Southern segregated Iunch counters. In addition to pickcting Wool- wortlfs downtown stores, students also took part in Cityr Hall dem- onstrations sponsored by NAACP and NSA. 12:33 5 r. ILUQQQgJ 5TH U- x h 77: gmrgegn r Ne 350233,... D 5 'JI'.'i'J3h NH Buclch Wtiy: deftly dumps Alice Sthacffcr on the Hour as Incl Eigen The hillbilly boys decide unanimously that, calmly observes, the Yankees are comin'! and Joe Kuypers ducks Our country, obviously. nccds us. 101' cover. The Senate investigates a hill community in But i5 i1 art? Director Bob Aslmnhurst confronts the female chorus- The Senator USene Kadism explains graphically to Seth Gohn Diet- Carol Homing and Xcal Johnston practice scene-stealing. manm the blessings of mother. the flag. and democracy. the Blackfriors '59 production, Sour Mosh Composer-pianist Eimcr Maas and trumpeter Bill Spady play on and on as chaos erupts on stage and author Don McClintock watches from the back of the hall uncertain whether to laugh or wccp. 1: of lhc: festwitiesa, Joshua T -' gallery talk on modern SCUIDLUIE The. cage Ballet Guild gave a performance to a packed house. FOTA and The xx. er If thr: Florcnce James Adams poet reading c m. t Charles Vernoff. At an early gas members of the Festival of the Arts committee lead - ndL'ffET tiextrcme lci'lil prepare the campus for a Molierek The IVIisarLtl'Irmzte'F was presented over VVUCB during the festival, The comedy was directed by Richard dumjou and produced by Ann UBricn. Cornelia Otis Skinner, complete with dog, was at the poetry reading contest before attending a reception in her hon0r Blackfriors '60 welcome springtime with culture, comedy, The 1960 Blackfriar show, 'Silver Bells and Cockle Shells, was writ- ten by Marty Rabinowitz and Dick Weiss, produced by jim Best, and directed by John CaHahan. Featured on stage were Gerry Mast, Mike Hrinda, Gene Kadish, Barnett Weiss. Lonnie Bovar, and Cindy Whitsell. and the Beaux Arts Ball Wm k 94 The costume theme at the 1960 ball was Char- acters from Great Cinema Productions. Win- ners in the couples division were Bill Carmen and Norma alias Andjn Schmidt who came as Operation Petticoat. 96 The publications . . . Lois Gardner has edited the campus magazine through its second year after revival. Phoenix, 4 J v a i . Caveditor Neal juhnsion simultaneously whips off a penetrating tirade, ---- a tells off a university burocrat, and poses for a picture, while William 9 V .. .. . Bauer, business manager, W. Brooks Bernhardt, advertising managcn . ! ' and Lance Haddim coieditor, puzzle away at the print shop, sifting edi- .; lorials, news articles, and cigarette ads with loving, albeit hasty, care. a: 3' '3'! - q rm ; .. v Maroon, Among the more sensational achievements of the Maroon this year was the grinding out in a matter of hours of a special four page issue on Chanceiior Kimpton's resignation. Fred Schmidt, business manager, blends in. Kitchen door and AI Flares as seen by a Leica Cap and Gown, Aaron Douglas stops working for an instant to judy Reader plots a pant: ponder a metaphysical problem. John Mueller in typical editing pose. 98 Chicago Review .1631. 4 ' 9'.w' After a bit of nationwide notoriety Iast year due to administration politics, a local gossip cqumnist, and the heat generation, the Chicago Review settled down, under the editorship of Hyung Woong Pak, to a. year of calm quality. 99 The Bridge Club is a quiet, but active group, Tournaments are held periodically, The Musical Society performs and enjoys chamber music. 100 Ed Formanek and Dave Rockwell Uvith cam, members of the Chess team, match wits in an informal game. The team holds the United States Intercollegiate Chess League Champion- ship, and has won this honor the last two times. Various groups attempt to capture student interest University Scholars. an undergraduate honor society. are shown here talking with Bernard Weinberg, chairman of the department of re- mance languages and literature. 101 The Cap and Gown survey: 0 report on student opinion The University of Chicago has long had the reputa- tion of being a school where undergraduates participate iutelleetually. if not physically. in political and social Controversies. In discussions on campus the assump- tit'm that etudents are intelligent, informed, and prob- ably liberal ueually tloals in the background. little ques- tioned and wholly unproved. Statistics which prove their intelligence are available, and 5-30 well-known that their collection into an argument would be a waste of time. However, though the second and third parts of the assumptien have hovered nearer to the surface Of our conversations, few attempts have been made. to test them Intrigued by the opportunity for settling some contro- versies while beginning others, the editors of the Cap turd Omen decided to dive into the sociological game. We tlrew up a questionnaire covering some of the more sen- Sitive topics now being debated on campus, sent them out to the students. and collated the answers received. Some of the questions dealt with fact, but most called for opinions, and some covered areas where few facts are available, in order to discover not who we are so much as who we think we are As numerous people pointed out, these questions are not really answerable in any exact senset ltut the response we did receive in- dicated very definitely how a large number of students feel. on the whole the poll is a poor one. While the questions and answers are apt-eit'te. the questions- nl'tL-n use ambiguous termst .JJ'al'e, fourth yt'm' Why tltm't you mind your own businesst ,Uah', trrmul' year 102 We hope the information brought out by the study is in some cases startling, in other cases provocative1 and in all cases interesting. We found the comments often penetrating, some- times amusing, and even quotable, so we have taken the liberty of sharing our enjoyment of them With all the readers, of the Cup and Gowrt, by reprinting some of those which were phrased so that they might be used apart from the questions themselves. We would like to thank James Newman, the Director Of Student Activities, for his help in designing our ques- tions, and William Van Cleve, the Registrar, for draw- ing a list of randomly selected undergraduates, and pro- viding us with envelopes stamped with addresses. From the undergraduate body we took a random sam- ple of one fourth of the total. Some 565 questionaires were distributed; 218 were returned before our dead- iirte with answers adequate for our purposesewe were forced to discard two questionnaires which could not he tabulated because they contained no answer in the box marked sex. We made a number of mistakesJ which we would like to mention here, so that they can be considered while looking at the figures. First, we should have real- ized that the year category the or more?! would not cover enough individuals to make any percentage com- parisons statitttically meaningful. We didnit, and so, in I think you're lt'yin'.v to sell Cup :1an Gowns. .lfahn fund it j'ttm' QUC'SUUIWS CUUIII have Im-n much more enlierenh specific and mean- muiul. Nevertheless. a mmt interesting: and wetl-piunned questionnaire. :Utl'lr, female year working out our percentages we combined this category with fourth year students as Hfour 0r moron Question twelve lacked a no opinion; alternative due to a typing error. The part of qmation t0 called uAI'CH of Special, izationH asked for specific areas such as history, physics, etc, but we soon realized that this division would be less meaningful than a division into Social Sciences, Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Pre-professional work, and the Humanities. As was expected not every- one returning the sheet answered every question. This partly explains the diecrepancy between numerical totals The rest of the discrepancy comes from the ques- tionaires which were returned with no checks in the ap- propriate blanks. but with qualified answers written on the back of the Sheet These were of interest, but we could not include them in our figures. An even larger number marked a box but added qualifications. For numerical purposes We included these as if they had been unqualified. In question six the ziLoyalty 03th:: could probably have been called the ttdiselaimerfj since a few people wrote that they objected to the disclaimer but not the oath. When drawing up the questions we said tiltiyalty 03th:, only because we felt that students tended to iden tify the two and might not recognize the word disclaimer as used in the question. Who asked you? Male, second year In general. a weilemepared guide to thorough thinking about these issues. I heartily agree to the superior usefulness of specific questions. Regretmhle that only a fraction of the student body are participating In answering such a stimulating questionnaire. Finally, a word of up- pmclalion tor your sending the questionnaire at a part of the quarter when it can be given somewhat less rushed consideration. Male, ftrst year This sheet as not worthy of my comments tor I am certain the results will he used to the advantage of administrative policy. Male, first year 103 So much for thc preliminaries, now the results. SEX Maia Female 55.502; 34.570 YEAR M'aic thaie First 47 15 Second 29 15 Third 33 25 Four or More 30 25 AREA OF SPECIALIZATION Tofalnmuber Percentage 'i-waale .Frnmle Physical Sciences: 57 29.2 84.0 16.0 Social Sciences: 44 22 .6 45.5 54.5 Biological Sciences: 21 10.7 62 .0 38.0 Humanities: 51 26.2 47.0 53.0 Prerprofessional: 22 11.3 91.0 9.0 Incidentally, the percentage of men in the physical sciences dropped from 3823'; of our hrst year students to 23-370 of the men students in the category hTour 0r more.U SO that you may form Some idea of the validity of our sampk we will quote here the actual hgurcs fur the College as a whole, as of the sixth week of the winter quarter. Tomi number Percentage R'Ialc: 1282 153.th3 Female: 736 36.502, The actual breakdowu by general area of study as of the sixth week was as follows: Total munbrr Percentage Physical Sciences: 559 217?, Social Sciences: 526 26.054, Biological Sciences: 369 18.223 m Please ml in the following information. Humanitiesf 399 192V. Sex: Male Female Pre-professwnal: 165 8.17:, Year in the College: Oneh Two; Thrash As you may note we lost a few points in rounding off Fourh Five or More -2 the pcrcentarzhs. Incidentally, in arriving at these hgures Area of Specialization: Qiour 0majorj? history, the administration included pre-mcd under the biologi- physics, ethh cal sciences. 104 0 In what formal religious body, if any, were you raised? Wlauholic here refers to Roman Catholic. HProtes- tan? includes all Christian groups other than Roman Catholics and U. 8: C., Unitarians and CongregationaL ists. 33 .4 .d. F0 33 w. 00 N 33 02 v 3x0 v-l Ln m H 0K0 b . 113 3x9. 'dl m L? .. :1 .2 .53 3 TD. 3 fa U 13 m .4: w - 5a v: 4-: o B '5 0 GS L4 Q; . 4.: U B4 --1 D 0 Z 00 Are you at present a meaningfully associated mem- ber of an organized religious body? If so which one? 33 7. h- m X :3 0:: Fl 33 W H H! V0. 0 9n 3X x431 . N o b- - kc: 3 mi i; U rd .4 :1 VJ .. . O tn J: U 1: .. J: 3 3 m 0 p O :h- 58 .1: :1 CU L4 6 - P 0 0U Do you believe in the primiplc of American for- eign aid? BY SEX Male Female Tomlmmrbn' Percentage Totaitmmber Pcrccnlage Yes: 104 80.6?0 66 89.1th3 No: 20 1.5.5:ch 6 8.104, No Opinion: 5 3.834, 2 30?; By YEAR First .SPt'DHd Third Four or More Yes: 76.69A, 84.634, 83.40A, 92-070 No: 15.070 12.834, 14.870 3.070 No Opinion: 340;; 2.631; 1.87U 3.0ch0 We thought; when designing this question, that those people answering HNon could be classed as holding clearly right wing political views, and found on examinw ing our answers that those answering 'th were in a number of cases people who disagreed with the moral tone of our foreign aid program, objecting to the power politics involved. You may not feel that our numbers are large enough to be useful as. percentages. We give them to you, your opinion is your own, and they may at least be interesting, 106 tSJ The federal government should nationalize: A. Public utilities B. Railroads C. Steelindustry D. None of the above Percentage Total! number D: 67.3hx, 137 Other: 3am 67 BY YEAR First Second Third Four or 1:307: D: 643?: 72.1L7D 66.03f3 68.473 Other: 3 57:70 27.970 34.0?3 31.6CX, D. BY SEX Percentage Total 1mm her M ale: 63 3'70 8 5 Female: 73.3?3 52 The hgures for each of the possible combinations of items, such as AC, BC, etc.. were 50 smali that only by combining them could we arrive at figures Of some in- terest. gm Do you believe that federal funds to education should be available only to persons who have taken a loyalty oath? Percentage Tomi mmiher Yes: 170?: 36 No: 74. 31;, 158 No Opinion: 8.270 17 BY SEX Male Female Yes: 17.5?0 16.23; NO: 72 .973 783ch No Opinion: 9.69A 5-470 PEOPLE FOR THE LOYALTY OATH, BY RELIGION 23 63.870 Religious training and still religious: Religious training but not presently associated with a religious body: Religious training no answer to question ' tSl: No religion at any 0 time: 0-0570 No answer to either 2 religion question: It isJ we think, interesting that the people who are at present meaningfully associated with a religious body provide 63.8315 of those who favor the Loyalty Oath, while they only represent 42.7?0 of the total answering, whereas the people who are not at present religious, in- cluding those who never were, or who did not answer the religion questions, though they represent almost 600,; of the total, provide only 36.23:; of the Oathls supporters. People who are at present religious also provided some 54-770 of the total number of people answering No Opinion. We discovered this correlation almost by accident. It was so marked that before we had even begun to do any calculations, simply in the process of removing the ques- Lionaires from their envelopes, we noticed it. 107 09 The general trend of university policy in the grad- ing of college courses in the past few years has placed greater emphasis on quarterly grades, and less emphasis on comprehensive examinations. Are you in favor of this trend? Total mmzber Percentage Yes; 91 44-070 N0; 97 468?, No Opinion: 19 9.2:X, BY SEX I . Male Fe m ale Male Female g Yes: 00 31 44.251, 43.070 E, No: 53 39 42.934 54m, No Opinion: 17 2 12.7CZJ 29X: 01 Do you believe in the principle of socialized medii cine i.e. that the health of the citizen is the re- sponsibility of the federal government? By SEX ,Um'e chnfe Perwarage Totatnmnbm Pemeurage Totahmmber Yes: 40m, 55 441m 3 2 No: 51.070 70 48.6?0 35 No Opinion: 7.2CXD 11 7.434, 5 HM The general trend of university policy in the teach- ing of College courses has been toward the use Of a larger proportion of lectures, and toward a lesser proportion of discussion meetings. Are you in favor of this trend? Yes: 2670 N0: T004 :I No Opinion: 4V0 108 001 Would you urge a. qualified student to come to the University of Chicago? Tomi nmnber Perc enrage Yes: 150 76.970 No: 28 M.Scx, No Opinion: 17 8.870 00 Do you favor a return of intercollegiate football to the university? Percemage Tam! wwwtber Yes: 49 23.670 N0: 125 60.170 No Opinion: .34 16.3th, BY SEX Male Female Male Female Yes: 38 11 1217.?thJ 154ng No: 79 46 57.604 04.770 No Opinion: 20 14 14.7170 199?; It is interesting to compare our answer to this ques- tion with the answer given in the Cap and Gown survey in the 1954 book, when 300A of the students were for football, 58:7D against, and 127:. had no opinion. t121 Some students have expressed the opinion that the intellectual caliber of entering students had changed over the last few years. Do you think it has increased? decreased? remained approximately the same? Tom ???in35'?!' Percentage Increased: 18 11.270 Decreased: 46 28.8CK, Remained approx. same: 96 60.070 BY SEX Male Fem ale IMEIE Femote Increased: 17 1 15.7?0 1.90;; Decreased: 29 17 26.8?0 32.670 Remained approx same: 62 34 S7. 3; 65. 3-; This last question was not designed to find out any facts, or even to discover articulate Opinion so much as to demonstrate how we feel about ourselvea With it we end our questionaire. Whenever we failed to include hgures by sex or year in the analysis of our data it is because we found no correlation of signihcance. 109 Bring back the old college. Fannie, second year Them seem; to bc a lack of thoroughness in UC classes. Instructors stem to be too jntcucslcd in covering :1 lame quantity of materiai, nut in covering it well. Perhaps the instructors 1'ch that the students should assume that responsibilily. The result is, as it seems From discussing this with students. that UC students receive a superficial sorl. of education. Male, second year In my npinion. there is Ol'lL' serious flaw in 1hr collnrur pmgrzlm: over- tsmplmsis 0n philnmphy. Al'tcr three years here. I foul that I could be a line medieval Culhnlic but I wonder if I am equipped fur the Twen- tiulh Century. 1 10 Frmrllr, Hn'rd ymr . . s- a ...!.u n' U . . ,UA 9'.th j' A Ha. er I have dam: my best to dissuade students from coming to this Univer- sity' I have often been succmssful. J'Ifafc, f0 mi: year Completely unaware of any serious discussion taking place at U of C. Upon first entering UC, I felt that I was completely surrounded by a group of cause-scekers. Persons knowing nothing, lacking the intelli- gence to look it up, yet having a great deal to say. M'afe, second year The dormitories . . . ,. --m----.. - MEN W - . The government should nationalize Fac. EX. Mafr, third year I signed the loyalty oath although I definitely disagreed with it in principlel Maia, fa 1:th year It seems it is the prerogative of the government to choose whom it wishes. to grant funds to. Anyone. however, who would not be willing to take such an oath is not necessarily a Spyhnot even very likely, since a good spy would know how to behave intelligently. The point is that anyone who wouldn't be willing to take such an oath is probably just a Fifth Amendment fanatic so like the loud-mouthed social sci- ence students of this campus-who would he mu trivial and bird brained to merit giving a grant in the first place! For Heavens sake, why shouldn't someone say htfs willing to be loyal to the U.S. gov't?! Femaie, third year Within my two years an the University I have noticed a drfmile dC- crease in the intellectual caliber but this has given rise to a new high in student. humanity. The students are intcHigent. pleasingly so. and they am real humans to boot. I say more pmx'm' to the new trend. meie, second year The University has changed its emphasis from that oi developing mature students to developing well behaved citizens with some educai Lion. Male, third year I would like to see a more wholesome, refined group of students at the University. Female, fourth year The iirst year students seem more aware of th: world around them. In a word, they seem more well-munded. You could. perhaps, inter- pret this as an increase in intelligence, but I did not choose to make the decision. Male, fourth year I think it is very foolish for UC students to feel thai the: school is going to nbeauty and brawn just because some 01 the Erst year girls comb their hair and wear iipslitk, The only thing wrong with the new college is the old students. Female, first year 114 At about seven olclock on Wednesday, January 3rd, a group of jubiliant UC students marched gallantly into the court of New Dorm, one of the important stops of the Knox preugame rally. They left an hour later, their pre-game enthusiasm, their clothes, and even their skins severely dampened by opposition, cobras, and water balloons. Their cold but well planned receptiOn was the triumph of the year for the East House Lounge Sitters. This group of militant, but normally sedentary, mem- bers of East House felt that the marchers Hhad no right31 to stop at the New Dorm. Their ire roused, they spent the afternoon fashioning weapons. By evening 120 water balloons were assembled and every cobra ta portable water hose made of surgical tubing in a cloth sleevei in the house was ready. After the marchers had assem- bled, the Lounge Sitters let fly, The struggle was brief and utterly devastating. Later tempers cooled and clothes dried. Chicago beat Knox 63-65. Chicago has a reputation for being opmminded but everyone, or at least the majority, doses their minds and opens their mouths when athletics are brought up. M'afc, jirst year 115 My only comment on the studcnm now entering is that they appear to be the type who can adjust themaclx-es to the werld of today in a. manner which will be prorltabll: to both thcmselws and society; this is a quality not posgcsscd by many older students. Male third Year The U of C must accept its; role as an instiluiion of, by and for the schoiau. Its present aLLempts to become more like an avcragc school will leave it haliway in the middle, and outstanding in nothing. Male, fin! ywr As a J'LIIC, I think thr iacuIty is great, thn courses arc grcat Hum- espec-iallyj. I Iiku Hyde Park undeveloped. The squirrels are loo 21L. Erwsm: Art in Live h'Jtil is a wonderful idea. I think Roualt 18 SP :ullenl. I am leading a quiet life here at Mike's placel' tcl'. Fcrlingettij. Male; first war Lel's see a campaign against this beatnik attitude on this campus. chale, first year 116 On the hrst Thursday in March Jim Newman visited New Dorm to diseuse the behavior of residents in the central lounge. In East House Mr. Newman began by expressing regret over his unhappy but necessary choice of subject matter. Then he pointed out the fact that certain problems were created by the notorious lack of privacy. However, he added that some kinds of be- havior would not be appmpriate even in a private living room. Napping, eating, and petting were abso- lutely unacceptable. But while pawing, removal of clothing. and lying on couches would be suppressed by disciplinary action, kissing and holding hands would be tolerated. ML Newman made a sincere effort to present the problem as one of adhering to a universal standard of acceptable behavior, and anyone who saw it in terms of student freedom and student control was missing the point entirely. Still he recognized the fact that there was a. real problem for those who wanted to be alone with their dates and that there was llendless room for Hexibility and planning: in making New Dorm more livable. The meeting concluded with a question period in which Mr. Newmanls position and patience were severely challenged. Marshall Ash said that the admin- istration was trying to force students into fraternities since they could have girls in fraternities. John Snow- tlay pointed out the difficulty in assuming that every- one knew what was and what was not acceptable be- havior. In spite of evident discomfort and embarrass- ment at the beginning, Mr. Newmanjs patience fmally won him resPect and some sort of victory at the end. If I knew of a qualil'led student who was willing and able. to do the work, follow the University rules without questioning them, be uhappy and cheerful, then I would urge him to come to UC. But due to the tyrannical trend of the present administration, I would tell the llqualiv Fwd student who would want to be able to think and act independently without fear of unjust reprimalions to go elsewhere! This year's class seems like a happy. obedient lot. Too early to tell, though, who is going: to influence whom. I guess we will fmd out when the adminis- tration starts searching around the dorms for scapegoats to throw ouL While I'm at it: U I'm mt'uriated by the MAID. tactic of keeping a tile on our private lives, 2?! Why doesn't the University act with us, Ult- students? They only ruin themselves by studt'nls dropping out and low enrollments when they continually act against us. 3t Why does the administration assume apartment dwellers are living in 5in and should be herded hack into the dorms? Female, semnd year Newman discusses dorm necking I I l'- - t-I---II::-nhm I would advise a oualifted student to enter the U of C only if I thought he or she was capable of handling the emotional strains on students which are peculiar to the L' of C ie, in many cases disregard of in- structors I'or students. and paying attention to very few; cold-blooded- ness of the administration in handling students; relaxation of moral standards among fellow students and resulting moral confusion, in many cases. in new students. Fenmfe, third year 117 118 The Fraternities . . . Even the most rigidIy-entrenched, radically-inclined, and grubbily-attired apartment liver can be counted on to admit that, if you gotta have fraternities, UCJS are Iairly good. They are noted for their lack of importance, of exclusiveness, of size? and of influence on anything other than girlsJ clubs. The total fraternity active mem- bership is only about 250, a mere 1170 of the undergrad- uate student body. Even though fraternities tend to make up in noise what they lack in numbers, the noise is lost in the void known on campus as Apathy-ua won- drous negative creation which is partially responsible also for keeping in Check such potPntial menaces as Stu- dent Activities and athletics. Another wondrous negative creation is the Inter-fra- temity enuncil. Acting as a Iiason unit between fraterni- ties and everything else, namely the university adminis- tration, the council is made of twenty-one fraternity men and John Callahan. 1n the last few years, the coun- cil has concerned itself primarily with writing, interpret- ing, rewriting, and reinterpreting fraternity rushing and social regulations. The resulting inconsistencies have kept the administration con fused, the fraternities, there- foreJ happy, and Mr. Callahan, a man of stout heart and good intentions, earning his money. At any rateJ it is roughly safe to say that the fraterni- ties use a self-concocted and self-enforced deferred rush system. This means that T10 student can be rushed by any fraternity until he is one quarter 01d, thereby giving anti-fraternity and prG-Apathy elements in the dorms tie, the housing stafffr three fuli months in which they are free to build or re-enforce a protecting shell of Apathy around each new student Thus, when rushing begins in the winter quarter, the situation is a healthy one in which the fraternities must work to get men to pledge rather than one in which rushees compete to get into fraternities. The men who do join fraternities d0 50 for various reasons, the most popuiar ene being, probably, ina creased social opportunities, that is to say, parties. There are, in general, three kinds of parties: stag, non-stag, and very non-stag. Alpha Delta Phi Fran? Row: Zaug Wresidenn, Cushna, Sewall. Second Raw: Mills, Shepard, Pledges. Fran! Raw: Green, Miale. Second Row: Milfs, Michaluk, Church. Miller, Smith, Doyle. Ihird Raw.- French, Kolur, Burke. RinpeHe, Bean, Bur- Third Raw: Klein, Capel. HarriS, Kelley. Lewisen. Missing: Schuliz. Ion. Missfng: Hull. Randall. 120 Beta Theta Pi Fran! Row: Goldman, Kroiek, Swift. Second Raw: Johnston, Spencer, Haddix. Back Row: Duncan, Rusin, Awasse, Carbin. Sander, Swan. Missing.- Bailey, Puluki, ?iunkeH, Kaizin, Bumcroh Dieimunn. Piedges: Fran! Row: Frazer, Stevenson, Yzhick. Back Row: Geyer. Wilson, Frunf Row: Hyde, Bauer, Zugei, Schreiher, Krug Second Row: Mr. H. Brown Jenner, GESSEI. Missing: Metski'n, Mitchell, fuller, Evans, Henlhorne, Kuypers, UDistrid Chien, Moore, McCreudy, Bernhardt, Valentine. Knighl. 121 Back Row: Noreus, Brennan, Galinas, Myersberg, Verdenl Fronf Row.- Hunwe , Davis, Muravulo. Back Row: Burd, Blumklou, Erm'n, Kuzqnis. Fran! Raw: Smll, Irvine, Teitelbuum. Back Row.- leaacs, Easirrlun, Crane, Ormsbee. Fran! Row: Barnes, Hoyt, Jones. E4 E p '1. Delta Upsilon Back ROW: Engus. Dixan, Kennedy. Fran! Row: Berger. Missing: Muxson, RosenthaT, Thompson. Calm, Harem, CarIsun, McQuaRd, Wenger, SIoA betz. Kappa Alpha Psi Fronf Row: Brazil, Saunders, Malone. Second Raw: Laddy, Battle, Richards, Smith. 123 Froni: Small, Diacou, Corn. Middle.- Peierson, Ol- Facing: DeRnsier, Hrlndc, Biss'lnger, Spalding, Jan- sen, Stanton, MeIIger, Aulon. Bock: Retke, kcwikia DaVidSOn- MEWS: longslreet, Mueller. Schmidt Sfanding: Brink. Kemme . Phi Delta Theta Franr: Demeur. Buck: Pepper, McKnighl, Best, A! Rigid: Page. Lindauer, Ledvinu. In Center: Coo per. Facing.- Ames, BlomsIrom, lungmck, Weiss, Mowles, Pascal. Phi Gamma Delta Frnni Row: Shaw, Lenders, Thnmpson, Bemis. Back Row: Harrison, Griffith, Vice. Fronf Row: Ashenfurb, Twymun, Koumuzes, Myer, McAuliHe. Back Row: Kin- dred, Akerman, Furiado, Ei-Aref, Wright, Muir, Heiz. Pledges: From Row: Lean, Ivy, While, Shaw, Cornerford, Dormon. Back Row: Miller, Wallace, Goran, Sealine, Geiyel, Dunzig. Phi Kappa Psi Front Row.- Leaver, Sher, Korcazes, Fiaumenhall. Second Row: Lamb, Zar- Ienga, toomis, Mayer, Isoulos. Third Row: Finkel, tichly, Spellz, Preslon. Lipson, Siofland, Elumenthal. Franf: Berser, Zeitlin, MucAEee. Back: Pierce, Braz- sold. Edidin, Hoffman, Shire, Cope, Lipson, Sfoflund. Phi Sigma Delta Mailles, Oilenield, Rosler. Siegel, Bolton, Melfz, Cohen. liberles, Eniin, Folemkin. Kain, Cooke, Wanger, Komesur. Snyder. Fran! Row: Werner, 'Lcwik, Kirby, tDaveyL Pearson, Gray, Second Row: Gram, Froni Row.- SpudyA Serand' Row: Siricker, Helluday. Tomasovic. Toren. 3m Rodniizky, Pershke, Fishback, Cnsgrove, Neill. Back Row: Davis, Skyles, Hill, Row: Szawico, Sienn, Casiles, Gehmun. SIrecker, Clarke. Chad , Swanson. Pledges: Front Row: Sienn, Glendening, Canes. Second Row: Fink, Kulcsur, Hauser. Back Row.- Zernclns. Lahti, chnig, Ericsnn, Winmr, Costin, Liss. Psi Upsilon Zeta Beta Tau From Row: Kramer, Benensohn, Sioken, Turner, Sherman. Back Row: Diamond, Kaufman. Bmwnsfein, Ian d, J. Rosenberg. Fran! Row.- Kupelavitz, Murguleis, Roseniield, Kreisman, Frankiin. Back Row: Klivn, Stiafel, PoweTl, Moses, Harris, Wolf, Levenson, Hyman. Pledges: Front Row.- Roih, Specter, R. Rosenberg, Perin. Second Row: Deskrnun, Steele, Elman, Bloom, Olive, Blumenfield, Noyes. Back Row.- Sloun, Gumbo, Bunch. Comowski. The women,s clubs . . . 130 Delta Sigma DELTA SiGMA. Front Row: Donne: Berg, Anita Rozloml, Judy Forward, Martha Tempie, Sylvia Cadu. Second Row: Jeanne CahilL Avima Ruder, Sandy Jenkins, Macha Buckman, Marge Schwarz, Penny Syrekl Third Row: Maxine Blau, Gerry Byrne, Virgx'niu Dickey, Charlotte Morgan, Mary Ann Eininger, Heien Faricy Monison Fomlh Row: Diana Quinn, Lois Carlson, Judy Stein, Andwu ?unticnrvo, Janice Hovfick. liviiu Rapa, Liz Truninger. Missing: Katy Kane, Gloria ?aulik, Mexican Rose, Chariotre Wea ?herfan. 132 ESOTERIC. Fran? Row: Barbara Unger, Royetfn Jones. Lisa Bodor, Fran ?alkanslein, Daffy Shurpless. Liz Robson, Marian Irving. Jeun Maclenn. Sezond Row: Arlene .thzlshimafI Judy Bergman , Roxanne Russ, Julie Hackerl Murii Mundl, Alice Swift, Sue Fries. Third Row: Pm Zuker, Jean Dames, Mimi Shaw, Barbara Flynn, Bobby Kugell. Fourth Row: Marge Brown, Edna Arrington, Judy Berry, Joan Rehnge, Alice WickliHe, Jaime Kuapik, Sybil McCracken. Esoteric Mortorboard MORTARBOARD. Fran? Row: Palsy Moves, Marilyn Guse, Becky Barren, Roberta Dehch, Debby Dinitz. Setund Raw: Ann Barnett, Miliyr Zebrak, Joyce Rukns, Joan Goyley. Third Row: Scoilie Dean, Sharon Zeigmon. Judy Franzehi. Joan Waller, Carol Fernslrom, Liiliun Galdik, Murly Kirk. Fourth Row: Adrienne Lipson. Sylvia lubzurs, June On, Frances Froelith, Felicily O'Menra, Rubin Bogeuus, Carol Buumeisrer, Phyllis Goldstein, Suaon Smerdo, Elaine Adler. HFH'I Row: Mitzie Fischman, Toni DeKoven, Carol Neii, ManyI Taliunevicius, Paulelre Luwilz, Dalia Grebliunus, Ida Lerner, Shirley Salmon, Rose Weiner. Avis Schulner. Quadranglers QUADRANGLERS Fran! Row: Barbara Bubbin, Karen Kirk, Allyson Perry, Barbara Wesolowski, leis Pinto. Pu! Litre. Second Row: Chorione Wood Martin, Ruth Nash, Sylvia Hadley Hodgson, Abbie Sheldon, Jackie Hucko, Karyll Allyn. Ihird Row: Elenie Kostopoulos, Judy Muhan, Mary Jean Spieg1e Zimmerman, Carole Thorpe Lopez, Nancy Marcus Rosenbccher. ': -..-.r.r..-.!'y SIGMA. From Raw: Judy Aronson, Doroihy Hupias, Lurie Fumel. Second Row: Mary Ellen Schultz, Judy DeMWchuels, JoRiln Morrs LPresidenlL Susan Plan, Marion Evkovich, Third Row: Violet Stark, Jeannine Adkins, Marilyn Drury, Susan Strodihoff, Carleen Johnson Schmidt Llnfer-Oub Presidentk, Ellen Gandermunn. Sigma 135 136 winning team, cheering crowd 137 After compiling the best won-lost record in 38 years last season with 13 wins against 6 defeats, this yearts Maroon basketball Squad ran up a win streak of 13 straight t20 in a row counting the last 7 games of the 1959 campaigni and finished the year with 18 victories and 4 losses, the best seasonis record for a Chicago team since the 12-0 slate in 1909. According to Joe Stampf, Maroon mentor, the key to the teams success was experience, size, bench strength, and proper attitude and desire. Their ability to work as a team was a vital factor, evident to the hundreds of new fans the Maroons acquired during the course of the season. The mainstays of the Chicago ball-control offense were seniors Gary Pearson 6-4, Mitch Watkins 6-4, and Clarence Woods 675, junior Jerry Toren 6-4, and 138 Height, experience, and depth sophomore guards Ray Strecker 6-2 and Steve Ullman 5-9. Freshman standouts were guards Jeel Zemans 6-1, and Larry Lise 6e0. Pearson and Watkins, both year letter Winners, 131115 Toren topped the squad in both scoring and rebounding. Pearson scored 288 points and hauled in 250 rebounds, Toren scored 231 points with 115 rebound; while Watkins hit for 18? markers and snared 139 boards. For the season the Maroons shot .392 from the floor, .598 from the free throw line, snared 46.3 rebounds per game, and averaged 57.4 points per game while holding their opponents to 36.4 rebounds and 48.3 points per game. Besides Toren, Strecker, Ullman, Liss, and Zemans, Stampf will have a. host of Other freshman and sopho- more dependabies from which to mold next yearts squad. The Seasun: Chicago 59 Lawrence 57 Chicago 57 Lake Forest 55 Chicago 67 St. Procopius 49 Chicago 72 U. I. C. 43 Chicago Fl Ripon 66 Chicago 74 Union 50 Chicago 60 Rochester 53 Chicago 52 Illinois Tech 46 Chicago 52 Carroll 42 Chicago 78 Chicago Teachers 42 Chicago 58 Denison 53 Chicago 64 Chicago Teachers 48 Chicago 76 Dubuque 68 Chicago 60 Wayne State 64 Chicago 63 Knox 55 Chicago 50 Illinois Tech 44 Chicago 66 Johns Hopkins 4? Chicago 48 Army 59 Chicago 29 U. I. C. 30 Chicago 49 St. Procopius 43 Chicago 57 Ml I. T. 46 Chicago 0 Washington U. 2 contribute to the best hoop season since '09 Major C Winners: Gary Pearson Ray Strecker Jerry Toren Steve Ullman Mitch Watkins Clarence Woods Joel Zemans Minor C Winners: Larry Costin A1 Devitt Dan Eby Gene Ericson Larry Liss Merle Lahti Fred Paulsell Ted Romoser Mike Winter tr. - 141$, . f 1- Swimmers rewrite the UC record books For the past two seasons the greatest contingent of swimmers ever to compete for the Maroon and White completely rewrote Chicagois record book on their way to a 12,271 season in '59 and an 8-4 campaign in T60. Virtually every varsity and p001 record which stood at the end of the 1958 season has been broken at least once and, in some cases, several times since. Coach Bill Moylets crew have topped Northwestern, Western Michigan, Bradley, Washington of St. Louis, and Carleton among others, while capturing the Chicago Intercollegiate Meet with 93 points in 1959, and taking second behind Loyola 82$-78 this season. Their 1960 losses were to Wisconsin, Northwestern, Minnesota, and St. Louis University. Topping the list of record breakers was butterHy and free style artist Rodger Harmon, backed by sprinter Tom Lisco and free stylist Paul Schutt. Backstroker Bill Zimmerman, sprinters Dave Dee and Buddy Weiss, breaststroker Dan Siegel, distance man Phil Helmuth, butterfly man Paul Hoffer, and diver Joe Kuypers con- tributed strength, experience, and depth to the Chi- cago Scoring punch. The squad will lose several of its key men via graduation this spring, but Moyle will have a few experienced men returning to resume the assault on the record books next year. Major C Winners: Minor C Winners: Dave Dec Steve Colburn Roger Harmon R. C. Cordek Phil Helmuth Len Frazer Paul Hoffer Joe Kuypers Tom Lisco Dan Siegel Bill Zimmerman Buddy Weiss on their way to strong Chicago 39 Chicago 54 Chicago 36 Chicago 43 Chicago 60 Chicago 60 Chicago 77 Chicago 58 Chicago 52 Chicago 57 Chicago 58 Chicago 43 The Season: Wisconsin 64 Wisconsin Ext. 41 Northwestern 67 Minnesota 62 Wright Jr. 34 Carleton 44 Augustana 56 Bradley 35 U. I. C. 37 Crane Jr. 14 Washington 38 George Williams 36 St. Louis 52 seasons defense plagues hitting and pitching Coach Kyle Anderson's varsity baseball team wound up their 1959 season just short of the .500 mark, winning 7 and losing 9 regular season games. For the greater part of the season the Maroons? hitting was more than ade- quate, their two top hurlers sophomore Nemou Taylor and feshman southpaw Rick Williams were stingy with hits, but the teanfs defense was inconsistent. In several games their fielding was sound and they won; in as many others errors told most of the story. Leading the total offensive effort was Clutch hitting first baseman Jon Nicholstm who batted .330, collecting most of his; hits with men on base and backed strongly by center fielder Jack Marking fine .375 average. Bill Bauer in left, Dick Thompson in rightJ Chuck Faidley catching, John Luce at second, Ira Levy at thirdJ and Tom O'Connor at short comprised the remainder of the starting lineup. Although faced with a year of rebuilding and the dis- advantage. of a late start, Anderstin remained hopeful for the 1960 campaign. With a few key positions fliled by the promising crew of freshmen prespects this spring, next yearis squad could boast the experience and finesse absent in the last several seasons. 143 Varsity horriers lack experience A definite lack of experienced material plagued Ted Hayden's varsity cross country team in 1959, as the out- classed Maroons dropped 9 of their 12 outings. The squadis three victories consisted of a close 2?-28 edging of Valparaiso, a solid 18-43 stomping over Wright Jr. College, and a 23-35 trimming over the University of Illinois at Chicago contingent. On the brighter side, the UC Track Club team, sparked by graduate students Gar Williams and Hal Higdon, captured fourth place in the National Senior 10,000 meter Cross Country Championships at Louis- ville, Kentucky, with Williams finishing fourth and Higdon fifth in the individual standings. The strong UCTC crew also dropped Kansas 21-36 and Iowa 26-31 in their other two fall meets. The majority of the varsityis strength was concen- trated in the persons of sophomores Preston Grant and Tom Clarke and freshmen Pat Palmer and Dennis Rusche. A pair of seniors, Walt Perschke and Dave Houk, added depth and experience to the squad. In addi- tion to these six major letter winners, Gary Augustine and Tom Eartha earned minor awards, while Maitland Griffith, John Musgrove, Joe Olive, Terry Fowler, Walter Knowles, Dick Bentley, and Phil Metzger were awarded numerals. With the return of Grant, Palmer, Clarke, and RuSche plus the other underclassmen on this yearis team, Haydon should have a solid nucleus around which to build next fallis squad. 144 but track clubbers run strong Seasonjs Record: Wins 3 Losses 9 Chicago 36 Chicago 45 Chicago 2 7 Chicago 47 Chicago 33 Chicago 45 Chicago 0130 18 Chicago 32 Chicago 48 Chicago 46 Chicago 40 Chicago 23 DePaul 22 E. Michigan 18 Valparaiso 28 Wabash 1 5 Loyola 24 Wheaten 17 Wright Jr. 43 Albion 2 5 W. Illinois 15 N. Illinois 17 U of Wis.-Mi1waukee 19 U I C 35 Soccer squad paced by AIl-American Kaszuba Although plagued by sickness and facing the nationis best collegiate soccer competition, Coach Alvar Herman- sonis varsity soccer team showed some bright moments in its 1959 season. The squad lost five of its seven out- ings, one a 5-0 loss to national champion St. Louis Uni- versity, but managed to group their forces against two of the Big Tenis best: Illinois and Purdue. After losing their opener to Indiana. Technical College 5-2, the Maroons stormed back to earn a 3-3 deadlock with defending Big Ten champion Purdue at Stagg Field the following week. They dropped their next three rain- soaked, road games, losing to University of Illinois at Chicago 5-1, St. Louis 5-0, and Indiana 9-1. Their fmal home stand against Illinois earned them their only vic- tory of the year, as they suprised the Illini 2-1. A fast and experienced Wheaton team proved too strong on a snow-covered field with the Maroons dropping their final match of the season 2-1. but lose to the nutionis best Seniors Wally Kaszuba and Roman Wirszczuk and sophomore goalie Nemon Taylor turned in consistently good performances for the Chicagoans throughout the campaign. The squadis other Major C winners were Randy Denney, Bill Hauser, Oleh Kowerko, Umberto Neri, Frank Randazzo, and Russ Zajtchuk. Carl Mar- bach, Jeff Wood, and Zoran Zibincic earned Minor C awards. Seasonis Record: Won 1 Lost 5 Tied 1. Chicago 2 Indiana Tech 5 Chicago 3 Purdue 3 Chicago 1 U I C 5 Chicago 1 Indiana 9 Chicago 0 St. Louis 5 Chicago 2 Illinois 1 Chicago 1 Wheaten 2 Veteran Sonnenberg paces UC's wrestlers Led by a nucleus of three veterans, the predominantly novice Chicago varsity wrestling squad grappled its way to a 3 win 6 loss 1 tie season under the mentorship of Donald Bengtson. The Maroons dropped Valparaiso 2443, Elmhurst 26-8, and Illinois Tech 20-15, while gaining an 18-18 tie with U. I. C. Pacing the team for the second year was heavyweight Bob Sonnenberg, who closed the season with 8 individ- ual wins and a single set back. Close behind was 177 pound Warren Pollans with 7 victories, 2 defeats, and one draw. Sephomore Ron Chatter, the Martians! 130 pounder, ended the year with a 5-4-1 mark, while 167 pound freshman Jack Merskin finished with a 5-5 slate. Besides these four letter winners, Minor C15 were earned by Fred Hoyt 123, Mike Eisenberg 137, and Dave Silver 147. Freshman Phil Metzger 157 received numerals. With the exception of Sonnenberg, Bengtson will have his entire starting crew back for next season. 146 in a season of development The Season: Chicago 24 Valparaiso 8 Chicago 9 Lake Forest 19 Chicago 13 Augustana 17 Chicago 11 Notre Dame 21 Chicago 26 Elmhurst 8 Chicago 0 Wabash 12 Chicago 18 U. I. C. 18 Chicago 11 DePauw 20 Chicago 20 Illinois Tech 15 Chicago 3 W. Michigan 24 Sophomore gymnasts start slowly, As the 1959430 season progressed, the rapid improve ment of Coach Bob Kreidler's predominantly sopho- more gymnastics team became evident. Although end- ing the season with 2 victories against 5 set backs, the Marconi;J shy on experience at the beginning of the season and facing very strong Big Ten competition, began to jell, winning their final triangular meet over Wisconsin 58-54 and Ball State 60-51. Senior George Andros again played the outstanding role for Kreidlehs crew with strong backing from a pair of solid sophomores Joe Kuypers and Ken Driessel. The other mainstays of the squad were sophomore Vic Mlotok and freshmen Joe Stephenson and Ed Manniko. Though the loss of Andros will be difhcult to overcome, the nucleus of underclassmen returning for next season should give Kreidler his strongest squad in several seasons. develop fast, and finish strong The Season: Major C Winners: Chicago 31. Ohio State 71 George Andros Chicago 26 U. 1. C. 34 Ken Driessel Chicago 32 Minnesota 86 Joe Kuypers Chicago 31 Indiana 81 VIC Mlotok Chicago 53 Eastern Illinois 60 Minor C Winners: Chicago 58 Wisconsin 54 Ed Manniko Chicago 60 Ball State 51 Joe S tephenso n The Season: Major C Winners: Chicago 3 Detroit 24 Elliot Lilien Chicago 11 Indiana. Tech 16 Bob Riopelle Chicago 9 Illinois 18 . . Chicago 8 Michigan State 19 Minor C Winners: Chicago 7 Wayne State 20 Garry Crane Chicago 6 Notre Dame 21 Gene Kadish Chicago 20 Indiana 7 JOhn K013r Chicago 6 Wismnsin Jim Milgrim Chicago 9 Ohio State 18 Dan Rosenblum Chicago 9 Fenn College 18 Ed Scheiner Chicago 1 Iowa 26 Ron Shelton Despite Lilien, Fencers Fare poorly with Foil It was a lean year for Chicagols inexperienced fencing team as the Alvar Hermanson coached duelers, playing predominantly Big Ten competition without a single returning letterman, salvaged only one of their eleven matches, a 20-7 win over Indiana. For a ma- jority of the team it was the hrst season of intercol- legiate competition. Team captain Elliot Lilien turned in consistently strong performances in the sabre throughout the season, and ended the campaign with 24 individual victmies and only 9 losses. Epee men Bob Riopelle and R011 Shelton carried most of the remaining scoring load for the Maroons. With most of the squad returning, prospects for next season appear brighter for a. better balanced, more ex- perienced team. 148 Novice netmen spark team To cm outstanding season Close competition for the top starting berths and hustle payed off for the freshman and sophomores com- prision most of Coach Bill Moylets 1959 tennis squad, as the Maroons won 8 lost 1 and tied 1 during the spring season. The squad stopped Elmhurst 8-1, Illinois Tech 8-1, Bradley 4-2, U. I. C. 10-1, De Paul 7-0, Wright Jr. 6-1, and Wilson Jr. twice 7-0 and 7-1, losing only in Marquette 7-2 and tying Lake Forest 5-5. They closed the season With a. solid victory in the Chicago Inter- collegiate T ournament, besting rugged Roosevelt U. by 10 points. Freshmen Len Friedman, Ion Berall, and Will Pro- vine, sophs Bernie Hoffman and Max Liberles, and juniors Mike Nussbaum and Karl Finger paced the team during the entire season. Friedman, Liberles, Nuss- baum, and F inger all won their Flights in the Chicago Intercollegiate tourney, whiie the Nussbaum-Finger doubles team captured the second fiight crown. With most of the team back for 1960 pius the addition of a few newcomers, next yearts team should be the strongest and most experienced in several years. '59 trockmen unbeaten in dual meets, Paced by the performances of some outstanding run- ners, Ceaeh Ted Haydone varsity track team went unbeaten in dual maet competition last year in both the indoor and outdoor seasons, besides winning the Mid- west Conference and regional NCAA championships handily. The loss of mest 0f the top performers via graduation has slowed this yearhs team some, but indica- tive of their balance was another win over 10 Midwest Conference schools in the 1960 indoor event. Leaders of last yearis team were sprinters Al Jacobs and Hosea Martin, hurdlers Mitch Vfatkins and Don Richards, quarter milers George Karcazes and Pete Mc- Keon, 880 men Bud Perschke and Ivan Carlson, distance men Gar Williams, Vic Neill, Preston Grant, and Dave Honk, and pole vaulter Dave Northrop. During the Spring season Watkins was a Consistent performer in the high jump, broad jump, shot put, javelin, and discus besides both hurdles and the relay team. A strong per- former in the sprints, broad and high jumps, and low hurdles during the 1960 indoor season was freshman Terry White, backed on the team by underclassmen Neill, Perschke, Houk, McKeon, Grant, Pat Palmer, Gary Augustine, jerry Gehman, Dennis Rusche, Dennis OJLeary, Pete Joseph, and Justine Johnson. W'ith the majority of talent in the ranks of this yeafs freshman and sophomores, Haydon can 1001; toward a stronger team again in the next few years. 150 but graduation thins '60 ranks Klein paces golfers to an improved season Paced by the superlative efforts of link ace Steve Klein, Coach Bob Kreidlefs 1959 varsity golf team fmished their heavy season on the long end of a 10-9 count while tying for third in the Chicago Intercollegiate Championships at the close of the season with Klein taking medalist honors with a 154 for 36 holes. Also playing consistent roles for the team and earning major letters besides Klein were Nick DeMereH, Dave Kreisman, and Marshall Sylvan. Henry Halladay, Ray Strecker, Dave Silver, and Jim Ferguson earned minor awards and played in most matches during the course of the year. The 1960 squad lacked the strong individuals of last yearts team, and chances for next year will depend on the improvement of this seasonas top players. Psi Upsilon Chicago's intramural sports program has experienced an unusual upswing in interest and participation in the last two years since Chet McGraw tool; over as 1M di- reetor, but the perennial King of the Mountain in fra- ternity circles Psi Upsilon is still 1'11 me entrenched on top while East II is lighting to capture its second straight title in the house league. Last season the Psi 152 and East ll continue their intramural domination U's totalled 1891 points for their umpteenth crown in a row, while East II needed only 1135 to capture the dorm honors. At the end of the 1960 winter quarter, Psi U held a l0705-7115 edge over its nearest rival Phi Delta Theta, but East 11 had a less secure margin over East III, 766-698;. During fall quarter of this year, Psi U compiled 28 touchdowns in 8 games to win the fraternity and All University football crowns while giving up only one TD to house champion East II in the playoffst Both teams captured their respective titles in golf, but they met defeat in swimming with Zeta Beta Tau and Mead winning narrowly. Psi U and Salisbury garnered vic- tories in tennis doubles with Chuck Werner and Les Hutton 0f Psi U taking the All University trophy. Phi Belt and East 11 grappled their way to the wrestling championships t0 closa out the fail quarter action. In winter quarter baskqtball Psi U and Vincent sur- vived severat close calls to win, but Chicago Theo- logical Seminary emerged with the A11 University cup. In tournament play Psi U nailed down the fraternity handball and badminton titles with Dodd and East 11 winning their division respectively. Psi U and East III . . 'iA a h Y: 10.? doubled with track and free throw victories and Psi U Em A ' $ 1 g. . . . .' .3 t ' , . , . ,- y. . 1? ?,i'zkm'm v.34: ' 35,-. Ar . '. 2 - t H4 :: -Jf'-.:iui and East IV won ther respective table tennls leagues. M ?wgmmmi $L i 'z J 4. .t . ?- 153 Some Sixty sports lovers hpackedh Stagg Field on F rank Seno Day, Sunday, October 18, during half time of the Chicago-Purdue soccer game to witness the fourth annual Psi Upsilon-inspired reinactment of a 103 yard kickoff return made by the former Chicago Cardinal halfback Frank Seno in 1946. As the ttstory:I goes, Sends record for the longest run in professional football history was broken just one week before its tenth an- niversary in 1956, and since that time every year on the Sunday closest to October 20, this group of inspired enthusiasts relive briefly one of the most exciting mo- ments in sports history. Escorted onto the held by a, one piece marching bag- pipe band in the person of Buzt Stenn, this yearts Frank Seno, Fred Dolan, typically bold and dedicated, made his appearance. After a brief but rhetorical oratory by F riends of Frank leader Bill Spady, Dolan took the field to face and conquer a. host of would-be tacklets. With only two ttblockersh to protect him, F rank sped for the sidelines, circled behind the spectators tas interferenceh, and after further confusion crossed the goal line in a blaze of glory. Frank Senojs memory would linger on for at least another year! Hass announces new eligibility policy Due to the success of several of the Universityis teams and the overall development of the intercolle- giate athletic program during the past few yearsJ it became necessary for Athletic Director Walter Haas and his staff to reconsider some of the eligibility policies which were in effect during Chicagois tibarrenii athletic years. New that UC teams are competing on even terms with many of the Midwest's small colleges and univer- sities in most sports, objections were raised against the use of graduate students who technically still had not used up their eligibility as undergraduates at either Chicago or other schools. For this reason, Hess and his staff in the fall of 1959 issued a ruling which eliminated students with a four year degree from participating on intercollegiate var- sity teams against other NCAA schools. Although this eliminated some outstanding athletes from competing this year, it is felt that the ruling only hastened a rapid trend toward predominately undergraduate teams. 155 Joseph R. Shapiro's art collection is dispersed to students quarterly in the uAri to Live WithH program Organized chaos Spanish, l'tortugueseI and French were added to the customary English chatter 0n the quadrangles as ath- letes from all over the hemisphere descended upon Ida Noyes Hall, the dorms, and the athletic facilities as UC helped Chicago play host to the 1959 Pan-American games. Free milk, pep, and ice cream were dished out in impresgive quantities by publicity-secking distrib- utors t0 irrepressible players, confused interpreters, worried chaperones. and impersonating students. The jifaroon. added its contribution by publishing its flrst bi-lingual issue. QuickIy-erected telegraph stations and 158 reigns as Pan-Amsters invade the campus post offices brought greetings to and from the athletes while continually-active buses and station wagons cart- ed them to and from stadiums, pools, courts, and play- ing Eelds. Peruvians sang rock int roll, Canadians danced the mambo; Haitians learned okay and J2me mudz, New Yorkers practiced UN and Hum; Brazilians thumbed ttSee Chicago pamphletsJ Alaskans tried their hrst tacog. The order for the day was laughter, excite- ment, confusion, and: mainly, noise. According to the newspapers, the United States team won the games. 162 PHOTOPRESS, INC. 0 OffseE-Iithography . Quality book reproduction 0 Fine coior work a speciaity CONGRESS STREET EXPRESSWAY and GARDNER ROAD COlumbus 1-4420 163 THE GEORGE SOLLITT CONSTRUCTION BUILDERS for THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO I ncluding ARGONNE CANCER RESEARCH HOSPITAL 53TH STREET AND ELLIS AVEN UF. WOMEN'S RESIDENCE HALL 59TH STREET AND WOODLAWN AVENL'E WOMENS RESIDENCE DINING HALL SOUTH OF WOMEN'S RESIDENCE HALL MEWS RESIDENCE HALL 55TH STREET AND UNIVERSITY AVENlE HIGH SCHOOL 5830 H. ENWOOD AV EN LE Telephone RAndolph 6-5330 C0. SUITE 1301 - 109 NORTH DEARBORN STREET 0 CHICAGO 2,1LLINOIS 165 166 The Windermere Hotel offers air condiiioned Private Rooms for all special Party Events-und invites you to Whe Anchorage, open daily for funcheon, dinner and late supper snacks. 1642 EAST HFTY-SIXTH STREET FAirfax 4-6000 PHONE: Hfde Pmk 3-9i'00 LEIGHS GROCERY AND MARKET Quaii ty Foods 132? E. 57TH ST. CHICAGO Telephone Open Daify BUttarFiald B-90l8 II A.M. tn I0130 RM. TAI SAM VON CHINESE 5- AMERICAN RESTAURANT Spatializing in Cavitation Dishes Famify Dinner: Cr Ordtrs To Take Out W0 can azungo any special dilhu you wish with advancn notice 1318 E. 63RD STREET CHICAGO 37, ILL. ill: GOOD W BOOKS LW FROM YOUR UNIVERSITY PRESS Introduction to . . . L. L THURSTONE Ex15tent1ahsm Originally published 25 Dreadfm' Freedom, this incxpcmwe Phoenix paperback expounds on what Five leading existcntialist thinkers have to say about human freedom and loneliness. The works of Kierkegaard. Sarrrc, Hcidcggcr. Jnspcrsh and Marcel are explained and criticized concisely and hnpanially. Probably the bcst thing 011 ths subject in English. hNew Yorker. 81.25 The Measurement MAR ORIE GRENE of Values J Twenty-sevcn important articles by 2 Embrace psychologist are here made permanently avail; blc to students and scholn rs In one volume. Louis Leon Thurstonc. who taught 3: the University of Chicago from 1924 until his death in I955. was widely known for his studics 0f psychophysical measurements and their appli- cation to the 50cial sciences. $150 The Chicago Review Anthology 55ch by DAVID HAY Ifcrc arc the best stones, poems, and artlclcs from the Chr'mgo Re- view in its Ftrsr eleven years of publicatiun. Compiled by David Ray. former edltor OFIhe magazine. this anthology includcscon tributions by Bernard Berenson, jamcs 'I'. Farrell. David Ries- mun. Ruutl Denney, Gcorgc Starbuck, and john Logan. $5.00 The Sense THOM GUNN of Movement Thom Gunn is the young British poet 010w teaching at Berke; Inga whose work has hem applauded on both shits of the pond Energy. depth. and technical skill have not come together in this way for quite a time. . h In Thom Guam we may have a major pact on our hands after all these yearsthOBERT CON- QUEST, Sperlalur. 52 75 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS FIRST THINGS FIRST! TO lay a strong foundation for your fmnilyh financial future, you should make life insur- ance a first investment. Life insurance provides imrwdiaie protection For your family and, if you survive, an added income for your retirement years. It also provides you with a de- finite program for systematic saving. Let me show you. how the Sun Life of Canada. mn benefit you mad yourfamily. You will be under no obligation and you will. see what ace mean when we say-- tFirst Things F irst! h FR 2-2390 Ralph J. Wood, Ira, 948 UNIVERSITY INSURANCE COUNSELING SINCE 1950 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA 1 NORTH LA SALLE STREET - CHICAGO 2 - ILLINOIS RE1-0855 167 cmatmg a dynamic new living mm . pl, 4a . Wit. . imi'u'u $5. gum... . up 1n Hyde Pal k adding frcsh lustre to this grand communityk tradition of proud achievements in the arts of urban living . . . of learning . . . and of technological advances. a WEBB 8C KNAPP development Which includes the distinctive LU11ivCrsity Apartments, illustrated, as wcll as exceptional new custom townhouses, and the 110w Hyde Park Shopping Center located at Lake Park and 55th Street. Townhouse Information: Rental Infornmtiou: WEBB EB KNAPP OFFICE ARTHUR RUBLOFF CONIPANY at 5757 Woodlawn Umbic HousQ 100 West Momma: MUseum 4-7310 ANdover 3-5400 COLOR llIHOGRAPHY LETTERPRESS PRINTING GRAVURE 8. PHOTO-GELATINE MILTON H. KREINES 620 North Michigan WHifehnIl 4-5921-2-3-4 DOrchesier 3-2444 JACKSON PARK GROCERY CHRIS ZALES Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Eat Fruit for Health 1458 EAST 57TH STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS COIIgtdfMZJiEOHJ to Me gta rut Zing Clack; 170 mifzieis FLOWER SHOPS 0Flowersfor AH Occasionsn l I Id way 3-4020 1340 EAST 55TH STREET - CHICAGU, ILLINOIS FOR YEARS THE SIIORELAND HAS BEEN A GRACIOUS HOST TO UNIVERSITY OF CHI- CAGO FACULTY1 STUDENTS AND THEIR PAR- ENTS WHETHER IT IS SIMPLY THE OVER- NIGHT GUESTJ A CONFERENCE, SEMINAR, CONVENTION, DANCE OR BANQUET, OUR UNEXCELLED FACILITIES ARE. AT YOUR DISPOSAL. SHHHELAND HOTEL 55TH AND THE LAKE PLAZA 2-1000 UNUSUAL FOOD DELIGHTFUL ATMOSPHERE POPULAR PRICES 1 11111111. 11 1: Fifiy-Seventh qt Kenwood -2- .117 a-::-;T :T:.: 171 3 i3 AREQKWC? Last Halloween one of the campusts most picturesque traditions literally lost its roots The tree in front of Woodworths, apparently the most solid of a1! advertis- ing mediums, was felled by the cruel hands of prankstcrs. However the gallant poplar was soon restored to its former gIory and now staves off the ravages of man and time anchored in a base of solid concrete. Sponsors Hyde Park Shoe Rebuilders 1451 East 57th Street Coliege Launderette 1449 East 57th Street University Barber Shop 1453 East 57th Street Ccmner Hardware 1304 East 55th Street Progressive Paint and Hardware Company 1158 East 55th Street Doris Coffee Shop East Chicago, Indiana Where The U ofC Meets To Eat GORDON'S RESTAURANT ON 57TH NEAR KIMBARK THE MAX BROOK CO. For Your Better Garments C leaners and Launderers On Campus Since let? We Offer 0 Complete Tailoring Service IOISJ? E. blst St. Far Prompt Pickup, Telephone MI 3-7447 Trucks on Campus Daily 173 1357 w. IO3rd St. Hllllop 5-2200 MEMBER FEDERAL DEPOSIT WSURANCE CORPORATION MOTOR BANKING AT ITS BEST ALL GENERAL BANKING SERVICES AT ALL FOUR DRIVE-IN WINDOWS - OPEN 51 HOURS PER WEEK - Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday-S to 6 Wednesday, 8 to 32; Saturday, 8 to 3 Gamma; GM COMPLIMEN T of the OWL CLUB at the Corral - 95th and Oaklawn i 350mm f ; SURF CLUB A Favorite rendezvous Fcn University of 1 Chicago faculty and students-und other intellectuals, and with a unique charm that I is entirely 115 own. American, of course, l and so popularilisadvisuble lo mckeresv emotions. Its reputation for Food has been enhanced by the quolily of its Steaks, its Ribs, and wide assortment of Salads, and :1 bar. : Now Located at 56th and Ouler Drive BU 3-7400 174 Congratulations to the I960 editors and swirlf of the CAP 6a GOWN for another interesting and r'nyforma five issue ozf the year book. The University 0F Chicago Alumni Association Afways your representative on the quadrangx'es The staFf Editor John Mueller Sports Editor William Spady Faculty Editor Marianna. Tax Politics Editor Aaron Dougias with Brian McKnight Judy Reader Barbara Quinn James Best Walter Fish Ralph Carlson John Carlson Photograph! Albert C. Flores with Gerald Adler Alan Berger Harvey Brundage Steve Carson Lawrence Lowenthal Business Marmger Frederick Schmidt Advern'sz'ng Manager Arthur Peterson Advisers James Newman Norman R. Wolfe 176 SPECIAL CREDITS: Cover: Reader; Kimpton interview: Douglas; editorial on student activities: Fish; survey: McKnight. GENERAL NOTE: This yearbook was put together almost entirely within a period of six weeks at the beginning of the spring quarter. The photographs used were edited from a collection totaling over 10,000 shots. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: For helping us to overcome a rather maior crisis, we would like to thank john Callahan and editar-emeritus Jean Kwon. PHOTOGRAPHIC NOTE: All photographs taken by Flares were on 35 millimeter film 1Tri-X-Pan at 650-800 A811 and Plus-X-Pan at 320 ASAJ using available light only. PHOTO CREDITS: 1Pictures read left to right, then top to bottom; abbreviations: A-Adler, B-Brundage, C-Carson, F-Flores, L-Lowen- than Page 3: B; 4-11: F; 12: C; 15-16: F; 17: A; 13: EA; 19: AI; 20: F,F,Public Relations; 21: Public Relations,A; 22: A; 23: Elman,Public Relations; 24: F,A; 25: 11:26-21: C;28-31: F; 32: 11:33: ABA: 34-39: F; 50: F,F,C,Public Relations,Arnold; Sl: F,F,F,A,F.Sun- Times; 52-53: F; S4: L; 56: A; 5?-61: F; 62: C,A,C: 63: A.C'. 64-65: Berger; 66: F,F,Bergex; 6?: F; 68: C,F,C,C; 69-73: F; '14-'15: Outing Club; 76: F,C,F.C: 77: C,C,C,A; 7'8: SU,Sealine; T9: TowelI,B,B; 80: F,B,B,F,F; B1: F,F,A,F; 82-83: F; 84: Berger,C; 85: C; 36-31: F; 88: F.SealineBerger; 89: Berger; 90-91: B; 92: F.F,F.F,A; 93-94: F; 95: A,F.A,A,F; 96: F; 9?: Greenbergcreenbergff; 98; Mueller,Carol FIOICS.A,A,A; 99: Mueller; 100: F,StaH,F,F-, 101: AL; 103-109: B; 110: F.Reader; 111: F; 112: A,F,F; 113: F,F.L; 114-115: F; 116: F,A,Freifelder,F; 117: F; 118: B; 119: A,A,B; 120-121: B; 122: Berger: 123: Towell; 124: Mueller; 125-126: B; 12?: F; 128-129: B; 130: F; 131-135, Lewellyn; 136-1371F; 133: LP: 139: L; 140-141: B; 14?: Fish; 143: L; 149: F; 151: F; 153: Staff.L,L', 154: Strick'er; 155: F; 156: F,A,F,A; 157: B.F,F,Berger; 158-161: F; 163: B; 164: F.Berger,Berger; 171-112: C; 176: A.