Swarthmore College - Halcyon Yearbook (Swarthmore, PA)

Text from Pages 1 - 232 of the 1968 volume:

The Halcyon 1968, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania was published in an edition of five hundred copies by Wm. J. Keller Inc., Buffalo, New York. The text is set in Helvetica. Titles are Murray Hill Shaded D, obtained from Photo- Lettering, New York, New York. This edition is printed in charcoal black ink on eighty pound white Velva Dull supplied by S. D. Warren, Inc., Erie, Pennsylvania. The binding was done by Riverside Bindery, Rochester, N.Y. The cover is black silk screen over aqua gray buckram, linen finish, produced by the S. K. Smith Company, Chicago, Illinois. The cover jacket is printed four color process on seventy pound white CC1S Kromecote. ftGo© [baQ@ ®qq U©@© § $!Z2)QK}ta®Gf ' © ®®QQ©@j© V 3 L 3 O) Ji cB Clair Wilcox has been a member of the Swarthmore faculty since 1927, and for many years the Joseph Wharton Professor of Political Economy and Chairman of the Department of Economics. It would be hard to overstate the importance and pervasiveness of his contribution to the College His world, wider than Swarthmore alone, has added to our outreach and scope. He has somehow managed to be scholar, teacher, and shaper of public affairs all at the same time. An advisor to our state and federal governments, to foreign governments, and to international conferences of governments, he sees his handiwork in policies that have helped meet and solve economic problems in our own country and all over the world. He is author of five books, including a definitive and widely used text on Public Policies Toward Business, and over a hundred articles. And for many of us at Swarthmore, both in and out of the classroom, his lucid ability to growl out the plain truth in a way that informs and delights is something of an archetype of how communicating communication at its best can be. His wit communicates too, shattering for all of us any temptation to gray overseriousness, and putting life back into proportion. Swarthmore knows Professor Wilcox, too, for long and significant interest in the studio arts. His insight helped us to see the importance of these activities for campus life, and his generosity provided opportunities that constantly make life at Swarthmore, for students and faculty alike, livelier and richer. So, however inadequately, one hopes in this and in other ways to say to Clair Wilcox for Swarthmore. Many thanks, indeed. Swarthmore has grown through your scope, learned through your teaching, and become more human through your humanity. — Courtney Smith . ome things never change. Magill Walk will always lead from the railroad tracks to Parrish Hall, you ' ll always need a key to climb Clothier tower on bright spring days, the Crum will always be beautiful in the winter, more beautiful in the spring and mosquito-infested in September. The food in the dining hall will never really be good enough, Swarthmore students will always play stretch in the spring. The basketball team will always lose. Some things change. Somerville is gone, and with it Somerville John. In its place, a luxurious student union. There is a new library, two new dorms, and a new admissions office. Ashton House is now a women ' s dormitory. It ' s getting harder to tell a jock from a bode. This was to be the year of Significant Change. In the spring of 1966, President Courtney Smith called for three Commissions to take a long, introspective look at the Swarthmore College community, and the Year of the Commissions was born. A year later they published their findings in Critique of a College and the Year of Change was at hand. Student Council expanded the Student Affairs Committee, and the departments elected representatives to meet with the faculty in Danforth Groups to discuss educational policy. Everyone seemed interested. When we first got here four years ago, they told us about a college that was friendly and hostile, big and small, kind but cruel. They told us that we were among the best. We were called Hoy ' s Revenge, the New Breed of Hoy ' s Wonders; wonderful enough to amaze the world with our peculiarities, smart enough to adapt to the work load, and naturally diverse and flexible enough to keep up with the change that was to come. in four years here, we watched the transition from Crum parties and lodge parties to Social Committee parties in the dining hall and off-campus beer blasts and private parties. We saw the polarization between jock and bode break down until there were no more bodes left. We saw the frats pledge better than fifty percent of the classes that were to come after us. We saw Swarthmore College trying to change its ragged, off-beat veneer and began to wonder what was becoming of those Swedish peasant girls Gunnar Myrdal wrote about. e a We watched, during those four years, as Swarthmore battled against the problems that were afflicting other small colleges, and realized that large faculty turnovers were part of the syndrome. But this still couldn ' t compensate for the loss of some of Swarthmore ' s oldest and dearest friends: Solomon Asch, Clair Wilcox and Samuel Hynes, and the many other good professors who either retired or resigned. We watched our own friends and classmates, almost forty percent, leave school for one reason or another. In 1966 we rode out the big social rule controversy only to see it buried again under a different rule, but with the same standards. In 1967 we saw SAC battle for a whole year over the liquor rule controversy, only to have that too unceremoniously buried. We saw the birth of a department of Sociology-Anthropology. And for four years we wondered just how good the Honors Program really was, and if there were any benefits to be gained by staying in Course if one were able to get into Honors. Finally we saw the Commissions established, and with them the chance for significant change; the chance for Swarthmore students who wanted to write, paint, act or dance to remain at Swarthmore, the chance for the precious elbow-room we needed so desperately during our college education. Something had to happen at Swarthmore College. During our four years the old era had definitely kicked its last and had died. A small college, more than any other, lives on its traditions: The Hamburg Show, the Folk Festival, Crum Parties, Somerville, Parrish Porch. Each one had been altered and slightly disarranged, some had died altogether. Whether the Student Life Committee ' s report will have any bearing on Swarthmore life during the next few years is highly doubtful. The administration assures us that it will continue to issue moral directives, drinking will not be allowed on the campus in the forseeable future, and there will apparently be a sex rule unpleasing to some. The college, as President Smith pointed out in his commencement address in 1967, is a corporation, and must be run as such, and Swarthmore students are, by-and-large, willing to let it remain as such. Yet what the Commission on Educational Policy has been able to see is that Swarthmore students need room to move in their education. They need the element of chance — the chance that they might come out of here and not go to grad school, to Law School or Medical School, or the chance to get excited by something that was non- academic. In four years at Swarthmore, we saw the end of an old-era and hopefully the beginning of another. We were part of neither. Some of us didn ' t care what became of M. L. 4, what became of Crum parties, or what became of the old Swarthmore songs. Some did, but all of us realized that they were gone. Whatever the traditions that replace them, we won ' t be here to share them, and for the most part, we were unable to share the old ones. But, as we said before, some things never change. There is a pervading attitude at Swarthmore that will never change, but perhaps due to the Commissions it will slacken a bit. The campus will always be beautiful, especially in the spring, and perhaps there will soon be time enough to enjoy it. Perhaps in the next few years people will be able to write for the Phoenix not because some day they hope to be editor, but because they enjoy doing it. Perhaps people will be able to get interested again, like they were this year. Swarthmore still has beards and blue jeans, but the people wearing them are a little different. Swarthmore will continue to have an Honors Program, but probably now the people it produces will be a little different. Swarthmore will continue to have its traditions, and they too will be a little different. And probably every spring people will play stretch in front of the library. Swarthmore, we could have had such a damn good time together. — Dave Cohen imu i ui-fT i i— — -T iTm j -T S g aa; as«igjiwgi Bwwv n B 10 the world, which seems to lie before us . . . ■ - a - .■ - I ' :-! 5mS SS3fflSB53KSSK32S3!WKSrcssn: : • ■v «.■ fe— ' • . • ' Mir. , . m •tm«?. mf. •Nk $ KM - „«■. .? - os -.. • . T - ' ' ' i . • L ■ ' : | •V ■;? Iff like a land of dreams, —- E te? -•- ,.; X mm ■USKk.l riff E ®si f ' 4 % 13 3 m , 14 ft l •, y r K H v - 6 — ... I iff ' t mgmi -  yV mm where the grass is always greener, pm 7 ' ' especially on the outside; 1 s m agsg3aigaffia=a g8B3BH HB • where the staunch and grey have gone before us i — ij rniiiimnwniHliTi ' from the muttering retreats, where they also have sometimes measured out in coffeespoons KSP!«MKMJJUjilU%i§K a aSSSSSKsasffiw™ 22 r 7s : s $$ w af once appeared so various . . . mmmmmmmmmm ' xmm 23 tUT ' «MgM i uu ngHi Mi a tiM iili aa 25 26 and even yet, in moments, . ««2 tips- :;:- ... j V 1 29 30 T;? SSSSSEESWSfflTOwsa j amawiMSi!? 31 32 can still appear so. r- . Oka ■ ■t x- «fc M c sj nly the women who walked by on their way to Worth or Willets took notice. Only the workman ' s hammer reverberating in the chill surrounds made comment. But a great institution (at least a venerable one) was dismembered in the fall. Yet, back of every inefficient independent grocer ' s demise shines a chain store, behind every Edward Fitzgerald fading from view stands a more accurate Robert Graves, beyond the ruins of the stacks rises McCabe. One can hardly complain. A few students scarcely looked up from their books. The faithful of the astro libe kept on, largely oblivious of the revolution on the far side of Parrish. The denizens of Martin still turned their keys into the door of the bio building at all hours while the devotees of DuPont slinked along the linoleum floor to the hall as always where they might breathe more loudly or smoke or talk. Everyone still knows everyone in Martin or DuPont, but everyone is not very many any more. Once it was that a newcomer in Martin encountered a collage of tables submerged by books, plants, food, prints, pottery, sleeping bags, and sleeping scholars. No longer. Once it was that you had to rush to DuPont right after dinner to fight for a carrel. Not any more. Tables are available in Martin and carrels in DuPont go begging as science students steal away to McCabe. But the transition held its greatest drama for the inhabitants of the old libe. As the lights of day turned down, a golden glow from McCabe attracted an audience of students to this new theater of college life. The stage was magnificent — especially the thick, pliant, rug. We felt like lying down on it and found a corner to do just that. As the year wore on and self- consciousness wore off, we began to feel more actors than audience and didn ' t even search for a remote niche but flopped down wherever. There was a fleeting, hysterical sense of stage fright of course. It ' s not the old libe! I can ' t open the windows! It ' s too hot! Too cold! Where are the periodicals? Is there still aspirin behind the desk? What floor am I on? Then the psychedelic box office went into operation. Pink slips. Blue, black, and green and even the people behind the desk couldn ' t remember what color was Wednesday. Despite the grandeur of the theater, it retained a personal touch. Why, the actors knew all the ushers by name, especially plump old Elmer Geyer with a smile on his face and a good word or riddle for everyone. Except for the shortage of steliots (each one an affront to lovers of itiffarg), the absence of social mores most seriously upset normal regularity. In the old libe you could whisper in the stacks or talk loud and long at the circulation desk until you were shushed, but you had to tiptoe in Friends. Where did you tiptoe in McCabe? Where did you talk out loud? In the old libe, a single casual (or casual- appearing) glance over the reference room could tell if she was there or wasn ' t. Not so in McCabe where people could and did locate carrels where — cribbed, cabined, and confined — they remained until the lights flashed. What do you think this is, a library? It is important to separate the nostalgia that colors the memory of the old libe from the libe itself (may it rest in peace). It was, after all, impossibly inadequate. Poor heating, lighting designed for moles, crowded, noisy — but . . . perhaps there was some virtue in adversity. Ahem . . . Authoritative studies have shown that McCabe upended the social solidarity of Friends, the smoker, the periodicals room, and the browsing room, depriving each of these subcultures of a geographic center of recruitment. Some of the old smoker citizens occupied the lounge by the current newspapers in McCabe; those who studied in Friends now congregated in the reference room from ten to midnight as before. But they were no longer what we shall call Friends people. It was every man for himself; the esprit de corps that was Friends was gone. More explicitly, they had become marginal men in an anomic society. Coherent homogeneity had given way to disintegrative atomism. It was a new world. The presence of august and seldom seen personages including scores of alumni made it a different place. But the ceremonies did not catch the essence of the library. That had been better summed up an evening before, just after the globe had been moved. Some carefree sprite then placed a miniature globe in the spot on the main level formerly occupied by the huge model. The foot high globe proudly commanded the many square carpet feet once shadowed by a larger world. We smiled, laughed, and returned to the books. — Mike Schudson 35 The McCabe Library was officially dedicated in December. For one weekend the mighty fortress had on its Sunday best, bedecked in flowers, adorned with a new tapestry, and rearranged by the removal of the mammoth globe from the second to the third level. 36 ■mm v M I Hh I i 1 i i i i 41 it ' s what ' s outside . Baafi wcsESS—s ' ■-■■ - 43 . fftaf counts I ' ■-■■■■ : :v - ■• 45 46 ■m mi - : II 49 a mighty fortress W 53 kJM - sessions of sweet silent thought he primary student activity at Swarthmore is talking about Swarthmore — about the work, about how impossible it is, about how much of it isn ' t being done, about the people who aren ' t doing it. There is, at times, an intensity and monotony that comes with this concentration on the affairs of the College that borders on paranoia. My work, oh the people, oh my work! After talking about the place, the second biggest activity is trying to forget about it — usually with one other person of the opposite sex with whom one engages in an intense, multidimensional dialog, i.e., breakfast, lunch, supper, the Friday and Saturday flicks, small parties and large blasts, folk dancing or soccer games. If one has not succeeded in establishing such an exclusive relationship, there are other ways of spending extracurricular time. For athletes, real or imagined, there is stretch or frisbee or frolf. There are rallies in Wharton and UFO flights over Clothier. For die-hard thespians, there are workshops, one-acts and full-dress productions. For incipient intellectuals there is a range of lectures from Parimutual Betting and Economic Equilibrium to The Place of the Papacy in the Middle Ages, plus assorted concerts, poetry readings and arcane arguments in Parrish parlors. Less organized releases, but no less effective ones, are such ad hoc activities as the McCabe Library Steliot Committee, formed by spontaneous underclassmen for the benefit of their fellowmen. There is the simple circle of bosom buddies who meet every week or so for companionship and poker in ML Breakfast Room. There is a fun- loving crew of frustrated miscreants in the new dorms who find psychic fulfillment in collapsing beds, candy machines and proctors under the guise of liberation. There are birthday parties with dorm-baked cakes, and special suppers in the lodges. There are bake sales with wildly- speculating bidders and arm- flailing auctioneers. There are yo-yo practice sessions among the Honors Reserve shelves, and guerilla warfare and gymnastics in the stacks. And every man can be an Atlas and put the brakes on the globe and watch it skid to a stop. There is picketing and marching and leafletting for all, and a chance for each student to criticize everyone else ' s attempts at the politics of pluralism. There are also those very private, very special pastimes that make for relaxation — writing seminar papers for the nine o ' clock ditto, finishing a physics lab the afternoon before Christmas vacation, or having hysterics. But then again . . . there ' s the Crum, and Spring, and the sound of your favorite sixth- grade mouldy oldy on the juke box. And a swing sometimes, when the townies haven ' t confiscated it or the maintenance men aren ' t repairing it. And there ' s the rock behind DuPont for sitting on, and thinking about how much it looks like the place where the bad guys got the last of the Mohicans. And when things are down at rock-bottom, when it ' s rained and snowed for forty days straight and your mail box has cob webs and you ' ve cut three collections and you ' ve got a bad exam coming up, chances are there ' s someone who noticed. Maybe they brought you a bagel from breakfast, or a Marvel comic from the drug store, or maybe they said hello and meant it. After the cold-sweat mornings of finals, and asking for extensions, maybe after saying good-bye for the first time or forever, after Spring is turning to a quieter green, suddenly it ' s over. The bags and boxes are packed and you ' re away, free and clear. And when you ' ve left the gray walls and the red carpet and the long green slope along McGill, how is it different? The people are still with you; whether you go to Florence or Fairbank or the Fogg Museum, they seem to be there. They said in the Student Life Report that the College is a potent institution, one with a large impact on students. And you get a feeling after you ' ve been here for a while, that they should have told you something like that on the tour you took through Parrish and the Libes, that day you came for an interview, or that first week here when it was ninety-seven and you were scared blind. They should have told you that this place changes you. Maybe they did. You ' ve changed, maybe more or 57 less than your roommate, but you aren ' t the same. Now you eat apricot yogurt and read Ti Mich and skirmish with Time magazine essays. Now you know how to play Lacrosse and pull all-nighters. Now it seems clear that you ' ll never know all you want to know. When the bags under your eyes have faded, and the raveled skeins of care have been knitted up a little, or at least gotten a dye job, a few years from now, it ' s only the changes that matter. The piffle about theSwarthmore mystique will linger a little, like stale cigarette smoke. A lot of the couples will have forgotten each other ' s last names, or divorced them. The sting will be gone from the I ' m busy ' s and the alphabet soup of the Phoenix stories won ' t mean a thing. The Blue Route will be gashing through the Crum. The only thing left will be the half-remembered smiles and the faint heartaches, the stories told too often and the convictions lived by. Maybe there will be the sense of ignorance that marks the educated man; maybe there will be only sophistry and satisfaction. It would be nice if you could be sure it had all been worth it, the bottom times, the tight times, the long gray times. But maybe it was. — Nancy Bekavac 58 59 111 MUM 11 GHLS OFF [M£ STRffTS AFTER OABX li I nw T 1 when so much is known, much, for every individual, must remain unknowable. 62 63 . . . diminishing the sense of undesirable uniformity . . . 64 67 all students, both men and women, have their meals in the philip t. sharpies dining hall. 69 71 dangling conversations . pattern of our lives ' . . ' ' fne f Vsf snow after wilcox ' s collection 74 not that the College aims to turn out a product of a certain sort . . . but that it concentrate on the process that goes on from day to day, from year to year. 77 i in 1 1 wwi n if a potent institution . . . one with a large impact upon students 79 ction is education. Learn by doing is an old bromide, but, strangely enough, a true one; Swarthmore ' s activists are learning all the time. Political and social action take many different shapes at Swarthmore. Some projects perform traditional service, like the work with girls at Sleighton Farms. If civil rights has been your thing there are straightforward things to do. For the educationally-minded, there is the Chester Tutorial or Upward Bound. On the other hand, those who want to be in on more immediate action can get a taste of community organizing with the Consumer Education Project or the Chester Home Improvement Project. Others have been concerned about Viet Nam. Variety abounds in action on that issue, too. The Committee of Responsibility has worked on humanitarian projects; SPAC and SDRU have gone all out with political action (demonstrating, distributing anti- draft material at high schools and induction centers, and so forth). The activist is probably more flexible than the academics at Swats — and at least as valuable. The Commission on Educational Policy was not the first to suggest credit for a semester of social action. A project is an experiment in moving the world so that it conforms a little more with the activist ' s values and ideals. Those values are pretty fuzzy at times, whether they have come originally from home, from church, from studies, from friends. The idealism is rarely destroyed, even though the experiments in bettering the world are never successful on a grand scale. Why, if I had a penny for every change in this old world wrought by a doughty Swarthmorean, I ' d be pretty poor. But the pennies that do turn up are precious: an encouraging word spoken by a paratrooper to demonstrators shivering through the night of the Pentagon vigil ... an Upward Bound student on the Honor Roll . . .or, sometimes, just a smile. The classroom is remote out there on the picket line. Intellectual capital never builds up much, to the chagrin of those who think students should be strictly academically inclined. But the emotional capital that is developed under fire may pay greater dividends in the long run — that ' s where the value of activism lies. We all have a sort of educated eye that transforms the way we see some things; activism turns that eye both in on ourselves and out on the world. On the inside there often turns out to be a discouraging amount of dry rot — hatred for those who cannot understand the new idealism or refuse to understand it, our own abysmal ignorance of the facts of suffering and injustice, centuries-old racial antagonisms that we discover anew within ourselves. But when those barriers — black white, radical conservative, young old — break down, even a little, something stirs inside. A new potential that you might have talked about but never really knew about is right there for you to feel. And with it comes the strength to go on, some hope for change that will come, has to come. How do we understand all these things? By the beat of different drums, no doubt. We see our wills beat up against society like sand blowing at the pyramids, polishing the outside, if we ' re lucky, but never getting way down to the center. One drum beats resignation: study, work, use the system, if only a little. And the other beats rebellion: the system is evil, and it is perpetuated by compromise. Grains of sand, it seems, are best used to wreck the gears. But always in the minds of both drummers is a hope that their different rhythms will not lead to conflict. The thought of the resigned and the radical sapping each other ' s energy away into impotence is too much to bear. — Ray McClain . ' 9 : ■ l ■•• iiliti miii ., mitf nun - iuSi JHHSMW mil! ii MMi.. iiiBliUUUn | «i I Hill 84 ■ some straightforward things to do 1 : ' «1 ■■-. v : . - . . ;r f DELINQUENT TAX COLLECTOR •■I 88 flan IWt o Do You Live- in Cfti-i-F. (■iutJft 4-) Ohe(tOw (m y3?) mnss. ffi PR ;l3o )? YouCan Support Eugene McCarthy Re isfeR 1 o Voie. DEmoCR.flric IN Vouk. stoic. P ?.imr the medium is messy, but it works 89i 7 %J J J f uz H E- H v OntribuCe I o I he FUND 90 91 tudent participation in sports at Swarthmore runs from the individual who confines his athletic endeavors to opening and closing books to the person for whom sports fills the gap between a Wheaties breakfast and a ten o ' clock bed hour. To parallel this spectrum of personal involvement the College offers something for everyone; these somethings can be conveniently divided into four categories based on the degree to which they are endorsed in the catalogue. 55% of the men and 49% of the women officially indulged in intercollegiate athletics last year. An intercollegiate sport is loosely characterized by (1) a monosexual format, (2) free uniforms and towels for all, (3) a competitive attitude to the extent that the participants care whether they win or lose and realize that their efforts are incriminatingly recorded on data sheets, and (4) regulations discouraging the nurturing of hair except on the chest (this applies primarily to males). In past years Swarthmore teams have compiled admirable records, especially in view of the size of the College. This testifies to the intense efforts of the individuals involved, and would seem to place Swarthmore favorably on a plane with other institutions which advocate the Greek mind body relationship. This is not entirely so. The status of the Swarthmore athlete is unique because, unlike the legendary campus hero, he is constantly forced to defend both his particular brand of sport and his way of life. The jock is not the campus anti-hero, but he does generally lack the voguish more-than-slightly- dissipated-look which drives admissions departments to drink. His is therefore not an idyllic life, and while there is no right or wrong to the matter, it is hotly debated all the same. This of course applies equally to the female athlete for whom organized sports are an opportunity to prove that the woman ' s place is not in the stove. The spectator, almost as much as the athlete, plays a crucial role in the Swarthmore bigtime. The fans as a whole are not a rabid lot — on any given Saturday an overwhelming percentage of the student body seems to have no idea who is playing, where they are playing, or why. Yet, according to the Department of Physical Education by-laws, Each individual, while benefitting from the physical exercise, also becomes better acquainted with the fundamentals, rules, etc., of the various sports and is better able to enjoy these activities as a spectator. Theoretically, then, the Swarthmore spectator really knows the vernacular and can intelligently yell things like pass interference, hands, kill de ref, and check the oil. In reality, however, the vast majority is either the pseudo-sophisticated element which scorns cheering as high school or the outdoors set which welcomes a chance to loll in the grass. Exhibitionism by either side is taboo, and the Herculean male displaying his wares is greeted with about the same amount of enthusiasm as the cheerleader wearing Purple Passion lipstick. Veteran Swarthmore female: I wonder how he got into Swarthmore with all those muscles. A rung lower on the athletic ladder lies the mandatory Physical Education class. Two years of physical development are felt to be an essential part of the educational experience — after that what the individual does with his body is his own concern. One possible course for the Phys. Ed. graduate is to partake in the student organized group activities. Here the lean and mean enthusiast can nightly indulge in intra-dormitory football or tag-team wrestling while on weekends various football and basketball teams battle to uphold the honor of their respective fraternity, place of residence, or ethnic group. Finally there is the spontaneous, highly individual breed of sport. Limited only by the season and the extent of his imagination, the aficionado views the whole campus as his playingfield and the whole community as his team. Pool and ping pong always attract the more mundane; the midnight mile the more hardy. Fall and Spring welcome Stretch, ranging from the cozy twosome to the awesome lech variety. Frisbee with its Frolf-like nuances is for some; tree-climbing and cycling is for others. Winter brings traying, coed swimming and an occasionally skatable Crum. A brutal ice hockey game involving nine guys and one girl is interrupted when the sexually opposite one is flattened on the ice. I ' m sorry, are you all right? mumbles the big bruiser and cries of Chivalry is not dead! echo through the trees. Yet the girl must get up by herself. A philosophy of sports at Swarthmore is necessarily a philosophy of the individual. Behind every team effort the goal is the development of the individual in relation to his peers. Sports help you to sleep, to forget papers, exams, and the people you see too much of. Sports offer an opportunity for friendships which would probably not exist otherwise. Finally a sport on any level deals in immediate, palpable realities rather than in academic abstractions. — Galen Fisher 93 94 ■ if Hi ■ . ■ . Swarthmore opponent 17 Franklin Marshall 4 6 Pennsylvania 12 9 Lafayette 2 10 Delaware 3 3 Washington 10 12 Lehigh 6 11 Stevens 4 6 Drexel 3 11 Dickenson 7 15 English Union Team 17 9 Loyola 12 95 laxmen take MAC, individual honors Captain Tom Coffman led the Swarthmore lacrosse team to a 7-4 record in the 1967 season. The squad was impressive in pre-season scrimmages with area club teams, and they went on from there to win the Middle Atlantic Conference (MAC) title and the Moore Division of the USILA. A high point of the season was the game with the English Union lacrosse team, which beat the Garnet 17 to 15. Individual honors for the 1967 season went to Steven Hitchner, ' 67, All America third team defense and Dexter Farley, ' 68, honorable mention attack. Bruce Reedy, ' 68, received the Most Improved Player award. Tri-captains Joseph Hafkenschiel, Bruce Reedy, and Joseph Rosenbaum will head the 1968 squad. There are nine lettermen back for the spring competition, and Coach Brooke Cottman will see to it that they and the rest of the team have that hustle and competitive spirit essential to winning lacrosse. 97 fafminn cindermen set records Without the pressures of big-time competition, Swarthmore trackmen remain unusually individualistic in their approach to the sport, yet generate considerable team spirit. The running attack in 1967 was led by hurdlers Bill and John Edgar, each the owner of a school record and conference championship in his specialty. In the 880, Fred Montgomery continued his winning ways, speeding to a second in MASCAC. Another school record was added by the mile relay team of Bartkus, Harrison, Montgomery and Bill Edgar in the excellent time of 3:21 .8. Field events were equally strong. Dick McCurdy ' s 194 ' 6 javelin throw earned him a second in MASCAC, as did Craig Schrauf ' s 140 6 toss in the discus. Fans can look forward to another winning season in ' 68, as only strong man Wilbur Streams was lost to the outside world. Swarthmore opponent 77 Johns Hopkins 21 Franklin Marshall 75 64 P.M.C. 75 68 Ursinus 72 92 Haverford 47 103 Muhlenberg 36 78 Albright Pop Haddleton Relay 2nd M.A.S.C.A.C. 3rd. 62 98 Swa rthmore opponent 9 Franklin Marshall 1 Army 8 9 Ursinus 8 Johns Hopkins 1 9 LaSalle 9 Lehigh Temple (rain) Navy (rain) 7 Haverford 2 9 Lafeyette 9 West Chester 8 Delaware 1 9 Dickenson Rider (MASCAC playoff) Faulkner ' s boys take MASCAC Ed Faulkner ' s boys had another good year in ' 67, with a 10-1 record highlighted by a perfect singles season in MASCAC, climaxing a four-year domination of the conference. Jim Predmore won the MASCAC singles championship, and Roose and Weinstein reached the finals in doubles competition. As in years past, the Garnet fielded a team with depth, with six strong varsity singles men and a large crop of fine JV players. Losses from graduation include Predmore, thriller of crowds, Dave Laitin, indefatigable Brooklyn wonder, and Bob Kneisley, lefty whiz. Nonetheless, hopes ride high for ' 68 with Captain Kirk Roose leading returning lettermen Frank Burns, Bill Miller, Dean Roemmich and Andy Weinstein. . - baseball spirits droop again, record sags below winning margin The ' 67 baseball season roared in like a lion, with the strongest opening record in several years. Led by co-captains Mickey Herbert and Jon Summerton, the team included outfielders Mike Halpern, Craig Martin and Mike O ' Neill, infielders Chip Burton, Abbott Small, and Dick Kamen, and catchers Lew Lutton and Randy Holland. Frosh hurler Martin performed admirably, with help from Bob Hoe, Bruce Draine, and occasionally Abbott Small. After defeating such baseball powers as Delaware, Penn, Washington and Haverford, the team began to succomb to its old nemesis, the lack of any driving spirit. As even the mighty bat of Kamen lost its power, Swarthmore barely lost its first bid in years for a winning season with a 7 and 8 record. Swarthmore 8 7 5 1 3 11 2 2 5 5 u 2 3 Moravian Washington Delaware Johns Hopkins Ursinus Drexel Pennsylvania Franklin Marshall P.M.C. St. Joseph ' s Haverford Temple LaSalle Lehigh opponent 6 5 3 4 9 9 1 1 H 7 1 10 3 13 r 5 101 102 the mighty soccer beast 103 The Varsity Soccer Beast (with coach Stetson, trainer Holland, and faculty advisor Thompson riding hard) gained momentum as the leaves turned, to finish strong in defeat versus Navy and strong enough in victory versus Haverford. Geoff Mwangulu (center forward) and Warren Phinney (right fullback) received Honorable Mention; Geoff and David Kim shared MVP honors, and high scorer Pete Fraser, and other seniors Tony Schnelling and Paul Leavin were equally beautiful in their new uniforms, to finish a 5-5 season. The JV Pony played inspired ball under new coach Peter Izapedus, and the Third Team Foal, under Englishman Ed Smallridge, made a legend of itself. As yet the mare of this brilliant line wanders unattached along the Crum. First come, first served. Swa rthmore opponent 6 alumni 1 Princeton 3 1 Muhlenberg 3 4 Johns Hopkins 3 Pennsylvania 10 3 Lafayette 2 6 Ursinus 2 Franklin Marshall 2 Lehigh 3 Navy 3 2 Haverford football ' s longest season 105 The 1967 Swarthmore football team experienced a disappointing three-five season. Starting strong in winning three of their first four games, including a 52-6 trouncing of Dickinson, the Garnet lost the remaining four, ending their monopoly of the MASCAC title they had held for the last two years. Led by co-captains Summerton and Montgomery, the injured Quakers limped through their longest season. Quarterback Summerton ' s accurate passing was one bright spot as he again led the conference with a 52% p ass-completion average. Chip Burton was high scorer for Swarthmore, while captain-elect Taylor Cope paced the receivers. Swarthmore opponent 52 Dickinson 6 23 Franklin Marshall 20 21 Delaware Valley 35 14 Ursinus 9 32 Muhlenberg 43 13 Johns Hopkins 53 13 P.M.C. 42 14 Haverford 28 but they were even better 107 Combining Heath ' s applied psychology with consistent team effort, the 1967 cross-country team strode through the Crum faster than any of its predecessors. Freshman Jim Colvin led the pack, setting two away course records and a new Swarthmore record of 25:26.7 in the process. A dual meet victory over P.M.C. and captain-elect Vin Berg ' s seventh place finish in M.A.S.C.A.C. brightened a season remembered for its Pemigewassitt cheer and close losses. Swarthmore opponent 22 Franklin Marshall 39 44 Lafayette 19 49 Princeton 15 40 Delaware 15 26 P.M.C. 31 20 Johns Hopkins 39 30 Haverford 25 M.A.S.C.A.C. — fourth place 108 matmen crunch delaware, pin down eight-one season. The 1967-8 season was one of the finest ever for Swarthmore matmen. The season was highlighted by a dramatic 1 7-13 win over the University of Delaware, the Quaker ' s first victory over the Blue Hens in five years. Coach Gomer Davies acclaimed it the matmen ' s finest hour ' ' in memory. Steve Shatzkin, with his unbroken string of victories in the 130 lb. class, continued to be synonomous with Swarthmore wrestling prowess. Co-captains Fred Montgomery (167 lb.) and Danny Nussbaum (137 lb.) and returning lettermen John Byers (177 lb.) and Al Robin (123 lb.) provided the hard core of team tenacity, aided by the surprise addition of heavyweight Eric Blumberg. Four (count em) varsity wrestlers broke into the big time — Al Mitchell (145 lb.), Gary Nussbaum (152 lb.), Al Thomas (152 lb.) and Al Douglas (160 lb.). Rumor has it the team was selected partly for psychological warfare , with four Al ' s to confuse the opposition. The addition of strong frosh talent this year bodes well for the ' 68-69 season. Swarthmore opponent 22 Albright 8 30 Muhlenberg 5 36 PMC. 2 17 Delaware 13 19 Lafayette 13 12 Drexel 15 24 Johns Hopkins 11 29 Ursinus 6 22 Haverford 8 modest record yet good season for swimmers With a modest 1-9 record, it ' s hard to explain why McAdoo ' s mermen had such a good season. In all the meets, even the ritual debacle with Delaware, the team had a wonderful spirit. The great Haverford and Gettysburg meets both were lost in the last relay. The main problem was deciding who should donate the money needed for the new pool, but there should be at least twenty years to make that decision. 109 Swarthmore opponent 43 Johns Hopkins 52 35 Drexel 60 60 PMC. 35 31 Lafayette 65 28 Franklin Marshall 67 41 Gettysburg 54 28 Dickinson 65 20 Delaware 74 28 Temple 66 42 Haverford 53 110 new team, new coach, old story 111 The 1967-68 season was supposed to be the year of change for Swarthmore basketball. There was an impressive new coach, and Dean Hargadon found several talented freshmen to fill the ranks. After a long season, however, the record stood at 3-15 — lack of unity, consistency, leadership, and experience had dashed pre-season optimism. An understandable morale problem was surprisingly well hidden by the team as they showed up game after game to battle within a few points of victory. Both Ursinus games, for example, were lost in overtime. Not just a few impressive moments were provided by Jewell ' s rebounding and Beppler ' s and Mizell ' s shooting. Captain-elect Bill Miller ' s leadership should make 1968-69 the big season. Swarthmore 66 49 58 58 65 60 65 79 (ot) 56 58 48 71 58 (ot) 66 66 56 80 53 Franklin Marshall Dickinson Muhlenberg Johns Hopkins Stevens Drexel Wheaton Ursinus P.M.C. Pharmacy Drexel Washington Ursinus P.M.C. Haverford Moravian Eastern Baptist Haverford HE ■■ m; y opponent 72 67 63 67 47 76 76 80 57 75 53 82 62 71 59 67 69 68 112 . but mostly, we had fun It is said that West Chester has 90 women phys-ed majors in this year ' s freshmen class. What can you do? But then, we ' re not so bad off, either — with only two seniors and one junior starting varsity hockey, Pete can relax a little, for a couple of years anyway. We learned a lot this year, aside from how to give the crowds an exciting 1-0 game. Things like how to suspend the classroom ' s critical, analytical attitude and to work together. But mostly, we had fun. 113 Jk. ' ■H on a plane with other institutions which advocate the Greek mindlbody relationship t was a subject that always hovered on the verge of becoming a major issue in the Phoenix: the student who wrote the letter to the editors was concerned about the position of the Arts at Swarthmore. The college should, he said, offer creative art courses for credit. He felt that the meager, haphazard little drawing classes scheduled at otherwise useless hours of the night failed to provide a genuinely stimulating atmosphere. Freshman year, I think, someone said that someone else was taking a creative writing class, for credit, at a respectable time of day. There actually existed a course in music composition. And of course, we all knew that Design in Drawing and Painting was really, for certain people, a cover organization, a front for their secret activities. They were studying balanced color intensities, but not just to enhance their appreciation of Vermeer. But before we consider them, we should think about that other class of artists, the ones who allowed themselves to be, not really stifled, but at least rechanneled. They ended doodling in their notebooks, writing birthday odes in the manner of Milton, and occasionally humming themselves to sleep at night. They had learned that you can ' t beat Vermeer, and so they studied, appreciated, and left serious creation to the presumptuous. Meanwhile the presumptuous kept trying. Organized artists were the best equipped to survive, and certainly one of the strongest, most resolute organizations was LTC. Haggard actors and directors and crews turned up recklessly unprepared for their early-morning hour exams, to face the real teachers of legitimate subjects. There were students who didn ' t join LTC because they thought you had to know the people, and there were students who did join because they thought the parties sounded like fun; still, a core group of workers sustained and strengthened itself. That was the way the organization functioned. Each year, a fresh Roc struggled out into the world, along with one or two valiant little anti-flocs, sponsored by varying groups. Committees of poets, story- writers, and dramatists left yellow reservation cards on the Lodge doors. Modern Dance Club and Water Ballet presented yearly concerts. The folk dancers found as much performance time as they could: remember how they looked the first spring weekend last year, when they danced to a portable record player on Sharpies patio, and from Parrish you could see the pattern of color and movement at the farthest edge of a lawn spotted with people and frisbees and white slated chairs. Chorus rehearsed. The orchestra wavered, dissolved, regrouped itself. The combined studio art classes set out formal engraved notices to announce the exhibitions of their work. Twice, at least, students actually made their own movies, improvising equipment, techniques, and, for the most part, budget. Members of the groups could encourage each other, anxiously discuss the progress of the creation, huddle together just before the performance or the judging, share indignation at the reviews in the Phoenix, and finally, after perhaps a brief relapse into individual student life, come together again to start something new. But there were isolated artists, too. There was that girl who insisted on practicing the violin in her room, with people trying to study next door, for God ' s sake. There was the painter whose entire dormitory section smelled like turpentine. You may have gone up to Pearson some time, attracted by all the lights. You thought you might try reading in the Hunt Room, but one of those people who spend all their time looking for a free piano had gotten there first. You looked into the studio on your way past, and a slimy- fingered potter glared back at you grimly. Downstairs, the actors intoned their final lines and crashed dead onto the stage, over and over again. Further downstairs, the set crew banged cheerfully away at pieces of reclaimed plywood. You gave up, went over to Trotter C-1 7, and studied for the Fine Arts exam tomorrow morning. In spite of several things, and letters to the Phoenix notwithstanding, there was art at Swarthmore. — Terry Healy 122 123 musical mystery tour confusion, contradiction, cohen, council- the hamburg show 130 131 132 W0[J5C fftLCUb- ' ME 4 -n l mom ■ H A?T UO0 ..J • ...- ' 133 ride a tin horse to Rittenhouse Square . } he authority of image and legend suggests that all Swarthmore students are cast trom the same superhuman mold; they are fabled to be uniformly bright, eager, industrious, motivated, disciplined scholars who learn joyfully during their four years at Arcadia on the Crum. And the casual observer might, in a brief visit here, be taken in by appearances of pastoral bliss, and leave to write articles either praising the place or damning it for being outside the mainstream of college life. However, as any student knows after a few months here, this description would have missed discovering underlying Truths about the nature and types of student academicians at Swarthmore. The most fundamental distinction among students at Swarthmore is the hour at which they rise to begin their daily swim in Heraclitus ' river. A first group — cheery, eager, self- disciplined — may be spotted each morning at an unreasonable hour hurrying toward Sharpies to begin the day with orange juice and wholesome SAGA oatmeal. Invariably these are course students with an appetite for knowledge, eager to drink deep and early at the Pyrrhean springs. These students are joined in classes by a second genre of Swarthmore turkey who has skipped breakfast and slept later. This group, probably a majority of the college, prefers to begin their day with tidbits of knowledge and other such food for the mind before an encounter with SAGA. This group comes in two sub- species: the hedonists and the realists. The hedonists simply prefer to stay warm and cozy in bed until the last possible moment before they plunge into the day ' s work; the realists (read upperclassmen) just see little reason to spend more enthusiasm than absolutely necessary in their classes. The members of these two groups may be found in the middle and back of classes, slowly awakening as the morning progresses and occasionally venturing a question or comment. By the time Sharpies begins to serve lunch, the third category of students, the fabled Honors variety, finally arise and once again begin to walk the earth. This bird is probably the most distinctive in the entire Swarthmore menagerie. Much of the time, however, he stays well hidden in dormitory room, library, or small seminar room; or he may cameflouge himself as a typical type Swarthmorean. For five days a week the Honors student, along with other Swarthmoreans, carefully cultivates the appearance of informality: semi-combed hair (always long), an old shirt (since Vietnam army green is giving way to flannel), and jeans (white, blue, or black variety will do) properly ragged and aged. On the two days on which he has seminars, however, the Honors student abandons this calculated unpretentiousness for an afternoon in that peculiar costume of the American middle class that is otherwise seen so seldom at Swarthmore — the coat and tie. On such days he may also be identified at nine o ' clock in the morning by his harried and sleepless look as he rushes a five page synthesis of eternal verities to the student ditto office. In the afternoons the fledgling intellectuals head off to various spots to study. Engineers may be found with stacks of IBM cards in Hicks library; physicists, mathematicians, and chemists inhabit the Dupont Library. The campus biologists and psychologists study in Martin to be near their beloved rats, and still other students hide themselves in the carrels of McCabe Libe. Thus pass the days for four years at Swarthmore — a routine of classes, studying, papers, exams, and SAGA food. Yet this is but the skeleton of academics at Swarthmore; it tells nothing of what is most important about academics — the spirit of inquiry that animates the campus life. That spirit has been particularly evident this last year, most powerfully during the week off from classes in December for discussions of the report of the Commission on Educational Policy. Superweek showed the spirit and style of education at Swarthmore at its best. The atmosphere was intense and serious — yet lively. The small red Bibles were everywhere as people tried to decide what education at Swarthmore should be. People became aware of the concern for intellectual matters that is the common bond of students, faculty, and administration. The air of serious atmosphere and discussion was one of Swarthmore ' s attributes that became apparent to all during Superweek. Another was the quality of students and faculty, their mutual respect and shared concerns that were realized in the meetings throughout the week. Students came to realize and value the size that makes such discussions possible and the strong tradition of close and informal relations among faculty and students. Superweek was, like most events at Swarthmore, celebrated by many words. Its importance, however, lay not in the fact that it was significantly different from Swarthmore the rest of the year, but simply that its characteristics were much the same ones that make the academic process at Swarthmore something exceptional. Superweek highlighted for the campus community those attributes that animate education here and assure its quality: the excellence of the faculty, administration, and students; informal and small group contacts among students and faculty; and an atmosphere of serious, intense, and lively discussion of intellectual questions. — Lynn Etheredge 135 136 the excitement and a the necessary vagueness of discovering the unknown 139 140 •:-■-■.. ■.,-:. ■■■ ' we have a lot in common ' b H | b — M 141 S £i 143 144 how to succeed in business 146 good day sunshine 147 - .1 t 149 the potent culture ' : ■ ' ' v- ; r i 4 i ! .::■■ ' ., ' £ yy?T an assembly of the college, called collection, is held at 10:00 a.m. on alternate thursdays in clothier memorial — college bulletin 151 e have heard much of late about the generation gap. If that concept were really unsettling to me, I would have to find another line of work, since college communities illuminate generational differences with remarkable clarity and persistence. Take the invitation received from the editor of THE HALCYON, for instance. He wanted a thousand words or so on the differences between the contemporary Swarthmore student and the undergraduate of your time . Well, my time as a student here was barely more than a decade ago, surely far too short a period to breed a generation gap. But no, the editor knows, and so do I, that student generations pass seven times more quickly than their adult counterparts. I speak, therefore, out of the rich and unsettling experience of watching your generations fly by while my own trudges ahead, or even slips back a bit. Years ago, in the 1956 HALCYON, someone said, Swarthmore is so many things: a place, a number of people, a period in our lives, a way of life, a state of mind, and perhaps most basically (sic) a process. That ancient author is right; the College is all of those things to most of us at one time or another. Time dims and distorts the memory. Still, I will try my hand at some comparisons. A PLACE. It is still a place, both College and village. The former has changed physically more than the latter. The old Swarthmore had Somerville, men ' s athletic fields where duPont has since been built, Book and Key, a dining room in Parrish, a red brick chemistry building, two swimming pools, a greener front campus and a library which had been outgrown thirty years earlier. Since my graduation we have acquired duPont, Robinson and Ashton Houses, WMIets, Dana and Hallowell, Clothier Fields, an animal house, the Service Building, Sharpies, Worth Health Center, an Admissions office haunted by memories of the graceless dining of the ' fifties, a disguised red brick Arts Center, McCabe Library, Tarble and a second tunnel. The landmarks remain, but much has changed — and for the better. PEOPLE. Many of us think of Swarthmore primarily as people. Individuals come and go, but people remain the distinctive element of this College. I think the faculty is stronger now. Certainly it is larger and competent to teach a greater variety of courses. The Admissions Office tells us annually that the student body is stronger too. Certainly it has grown. There are differences in the two student bodies which you have heard me attribute before to changes in influences and pressures in society, rather than to a new admissions policy. The Committee on Student Life commented on many of these changes. Some of the adjectives used in their report and elsewhere to describe your generation would have been less descriptive of mine: individualistic, permissive, restless, idealistic, concerned. Other words, some of them used in President Smith ' s annual report for 1955-56, would apply in some measure to students of both periods: vital, puckish, resourceful, serious, talented, scholarly. You are more concerned with the ways of the world than we were. You are more interested in the creative arts, in social action, in shaping your own development than we were. Even so, similarities are more apparent to me than differences, due in large part to the fact that all of us were attracted to the College and shaped by common traditions, institutional programs, professional scholars and teachers and an intense academic experience. A PERIOD IN OUR LIVES AND A WAY OF LIFE. This, too, we have in common. I will avoid, to your relief, a discussion of the place of adolescence in the maturing process. It may have occurred to you that I now view that period of life somewhat differently than I did fifteen years ago. Then I liked it, now I deal with it. The college years are a difficult period for most people. The people and the place, the way of life, sustained many of us and scuttled a few members of both generations. The way of life is, and was, so often defined by intensity of experience, a peculiar kind of semi-public existence, physical and mental challenges that sometimes threatened to become unmanageable, a routine, a periodic desire to escape. For me, that way of life was usually marked by endless bridge games in Commons, penny pitching in front of Parrish instead of stretch, lines before meals that stretched half the length of Parrish, the indecent longing for the coming of spring, more joy and less self- consciousness, but that may be an illusion that time has created. We were in and of Swarthmore more than you are. You are glad of that change. A STATE OF MIND. This is probably the most personal of the conceptions of Swarthmore, It may have little relevance for you. In fact, the demands for relevance in the educational experience that we hear around us may lead to a blurring of the distinctiveness of the college experience. It seemed to us as undergraduates, and surely to some of you, that the College was constructively insulated from many of the pressures and demands of society. There was room to try on roles, to experiment, reflect, to substitute honesty for game-playing in human relationships. There was a special sense of freedom limited by shared values and a concern for the institution. You will boil me in the same pot as George Kennan for saying so, but I think we all can profit from the insulation of the ivory tower for a time. Alma Mater was not an epithet in the ' fifties. It is interesting to speculate about the recent changes in the concept of motherhood that led a local magazine to publish an article about Mother Swarthmore with the assurance that the connotations for us would be over-protection and suffocation. The real problem, for you and for past graduates, is not that Swarthmore, as a state of mind, is too far removed or irrelevant, but that the attitudes and habits and tools we learned here may be applied too narrowly to make much of a difference to society. You have more control over the application of your education than your college does. A PROCESS. This is when contrasts end. In the basic sense life at Swarthmore was and is an experience in liberal education. There are a good many sturdy, one-sentence definitions of a liberal education. Whitehead thought of it as a process of converting the knowledge of a boy into the power of a man. At any rate, it is certainly a process. You were disappointed or angry, disillusioned or despairing when that process seemed slow, tangential or without purpose. So were we. It is inevitable that the cumulative effect of life here will be more satisfying to some than to others. But the process is crucial and the goals are constant and understandable. Mark Van Doren summarizes it for me. The main thing is that there are powers within the person which liberal education can free for us. They are powers over nothing and nobody but himself. The primary objects of desire are changes in one ' s self. The aim of liberal education makes the person competent; not merely to know or do, but also, and indeed chiefly to be. One of the rewards of being on my side of the generation gap is that it is easier to see the differences that Swarthmore, as a process, makes in its students. — Robert A. Barr, Jr. 153 Edward K. Cratsley vice-president Joseph P. Shane vice-president Susan P. Cobbs dean 156 admissions Fredrick A Hargadon, dean Margaret McLaren Douglas Thompson astronomy Peter van de Kamp, chairman Sarah Lee Lippmcott biology 157 1 • Jennifer Haines honors David Hastings course David S. Kim course Mary Lee Bannister course Agnes Brezak course Norman A. Meinkoth, chairman Robert K. Enders Launce J. Flemister Luzerne G. Livingston Neal A. Weber Kenneth S. Rawson Robert E. Savage Edith Twombly Eileen S. Gersh George T. Rudkin !W I p fer Leo M. Leva honors Jean McLaughlin course John Melbourne course Patricia Tolins course Chitra Yang course Geoffrey Mwaungulu course Robert H. Pollack course ■ ■•■■ i- - 159 1§V £ ■ t 160 161 chemistry Walter B. Keighton, Jr., chairman Edward A. Fehnel Peter T. Thompson James H. Hammons Robert E. Leyon Ronald A. Mitchell James R. Hutchison Joyce Whalen course Martha Oliphant Latin — course economics Frank C. Pierson, chairman Edward K. Cratsley Clair Wilcox Frederic L. Pryor Bernard Saffran Lewis R. Gaty, II John D. Patrick Helen M. Hunter Anita Summers 1 T¥ -a 163 Lynn Etheredge honors Daniel Eubank honors Robert E. Bartkus honors Albert Davis honors 164 Joseph Hafkenschiel Robert Holum course Joan B. Ingram course Meredith Jones course Jonathan E. Summerton course Fred H. Montgomery course Joseph D. C. Wilson III course 166 I Richard Gregor mechanical Roger Hillson electrical Bruce Connor civil engineering 167- Samuel T. Carpenter, chairman John D. McCrum Bernard Morrill Carl Barus David L. Bowler Raymond Doby Clark P. Mangelsdorf M. Joseph Willis C. Stuart Patterson, Jr. Victor K. Schutz Robert Hoe IV mechanical V. James Miller mechanical 168 «t,- John W. Weisel electrical 169 William E. Zimmer mechanical 170 english literature George J Becker, chairman Samuel Hynes David Cowden Harold Pagliaro Thomas H. Blackburn John ' J. McLaughlin Susan B. Snyder Emily M. Wallace Thomas Artin John S. Shackford 171 Richard Figiel course Donna Fischer course Adrienne Asch course Linda Creasey course Edwin Battle course Nancy Eichhorn honors 172 Susan Gibson honors Kathleen Hall course Teresa Healy course Julian Lopez-Morillas course Kathy Jean MacLeod course Eleanor L. Morse course Paul Horsling course Patricia Layne course 173 174 E56E Nancy Pepper honors James M. Perry course Diana Royce honors Paul Thim course Joseph Thornton course 175 Susan Russell honors Lucy Schneider honors 176 Robin Darr course Elaine Newcomb course Barbara Rickards course Sarah Steever honors George Xydis course ■ ■ : 178 James A. Field, Jr., chairman Paul H. Beik Laurence D, Lafore Frederick B. Tolles Harrison M. Wright Robert C- Bannister George E. McCully Bernard S. Smith John G. Williamson Peggy K. Korn Tsing Yuan Delmer Ren Brown course Paul Couranl honors Michael Alexander honors Stannard Baker course 179 Jonathan S. Dewald honors William Edgar honors 180 Peter Gutterman course Nanine Meiklejohn course Dorine Keith Peter Meyer course honors Katherine Larner Lawrence Parrish course Ray P. McClain honors John McDiarmiH honors course 182 A - ■i w W KJ 1 V - 1 k i% A Tony Roberti course Bruce Rockwood honors Wayne Patterson course J. David Reed course m t Susan Smith honors Mary Solberg course Robert C. Roper honors William Rubinstein honors 183 - ' T w - Diane Brett course Ellis Feinstein honors SH £ Joseph G. Rosenbaum course Mark S. Smith honors Faris Worthington course Joyce Y. Frisby course Richard R. McCurdy course :{fe Z, ■ i X f- % T 186 modern languages Francis P. Tafoya, chairman Hilde D. Conn Franz H. Mautner George C. Avery Olga Lang Jean Ashmead Perkins Elisa Asensio Thompson Bradley Robert Roza Olga Fernandez Conner Simone Voisin Smith Marie Jose Southworth Richard Terdiman Robert P. Newton Helen P. Shatagin Lucy Leu French — course Philip Robertson French — honors 188 music Peter Graham Swing, chairman Claudio Spies James D. Freedman Gilbert Kalish Paul Zukofsky Emily Albrink philosophy — course Alfred Brauch philosophy — course Charles Floto philosophy — course philosophy and religion Monroe C. Beardsley John M. Moore P. Linwood Urban, acting chairman Patrick Henry, III Hans Oberdiek Charles Raff Edward Becker Richard Schuldenfrei GilmoreStott Uwe Henke John J. Fisher D. Paul Snyder 189 Barbara Nevling religion — honors Leonard Orr philosophy — honors Barbara S. Gard philosophy — course Lorraine Lidoff religion — course Paul Prinzhorn philosophy — course Kirk Roose philosophy — course Barbara Theim philosophy — course Edith Young religion — course physics William C. Elmore, chairman Hans H. Staub Olexa-Myron Bilaniuk Mark A. Heald Paul C. Mangelsdorf, Jr. Alburt M. Rosenberg John R. Boccio Cyrus D. Cantrell Clair W. Nielson 191 William Finzer honors Richard Kast course 192 • ' .8? film ■ ' ' •■ -• John Mather honors Christopher Miller course Lawrence J. Smith course ■ oC +r a. - ' J ' «  __ 1 p - x7 - — • hen.--ls 3 i m. y ' ' I I ' = 1 f r — ■ s , P- i ■ - fc8 Jt 77 - - L r B j- im y -- - i .- ?«ii jy? David Swanson course Jean Warren course 193 %k 194 political science J. Roland Pennock, chairman Charles E. Gilbert David G. Smith Robert O. Keohane Raymond F. Hopkins Richard W. Mansbach Frederick A. Hargadon Nannerl O. Henry Daniel Botsford. Jr. honors Frank Brown honors Michael Halpern honors Walter L. Adamson honors Richard T. Andrews course - 195 Jane Jewell course Harold Kwalwasser honors 196 Robert F. Nagel honors Bruce Reedy course t Julie Biddle course Mary Bowers course psychology and education Kenneth J. Gergen, chairman Joseph B. Shane Hans Wallach Dean Peabody Gerald R. Levin John Anthony Nevin Nicholas S. Thompson Alice K. Brodhead 197 William Combi course Ronald J. Diamond honors 198 Rona Lieberman honors 199 James H. Waters honors Corinne Webster course Roberta Welte course Carol Jean Talmage course Margaret Updike honors 200 sociology — anthropology Leon Bramson, chairman Steven Piker Victor Novick- Jon Van Til Asmarom Legesse Olga Linares de Sapir jgm 1 i i r B ■ z W Kathenne Conner honors William Dorsey course Maureen Durham course Susan Almy honors Eric S. Blumberg course 201 ma y % mL Wendy Hyatt I SHPB m. course k Christopher L. King course Sarah E. Hall course Harriet Heisler course Daphne McDonnell honors David Singleton course Sandra McLanahan honors Bruce Tift honors seniors not photographed Andrea Allen — biology Stephen Alloy — history Vytenis Babrauskas — physics Craig Benham — physics Samuel Brackeen — civil engineering David Chadwick — psychology Dexter Farley, Jr. — mechanical engineering Barry Feldman — fine arts George Gill — history Kenneth Guilmartin — english Bronwyn Hurd — classics Jay Kaplan — economics Paul Leavin — political science Susan Dworkin Levering — sociology-anthropology Lewis Lutton — biology honors Robert MacLeod — economics Robert Morgan, Jr. — english Robert Pollock — music Francis Racine — classics honors Anthony Schnelling — history Craig Schrauf — chemistry honors John Seidenfeld — chemistry William Stanton — psychology Susan Gelletly Steinbrook — music honors Maria Szilagyi — fine arts Ralph Teutsch — mathematics Thomas Wolf — history 203 m t ' K ' v ' - v w H i m m ■ um —mw iimiiw mi mem 83!? 1967 track 1967 TRACK — first row: Wilbur Streams, Robert Murray (captain). second row: Robert Bartkus, Fred Montgomery, Peter Fraser, William Edgar, third row: Donald Stokes, George Harrison, Paul Peelle, Lance Leithauser, David Wright, fourth row: Roy Wilber, Donald Fujihira, John Edgar, John Yinger, Robert McKay, fifth row: Stephen Arbuthnot, Roy Shanker, Mark Daniel, Louis Miller, Jacob Graves. John Udovich (assistant coach), Lew Elverson (head coach). 1967 baseball 1967 BASEBALL — first row: Peter Swing, Robert Hoe, Craig Mar- tin, Michael Herbert (co-captain), Jon Summerton (co-captain), Michael O ' Neal, Richard Kamen. second row: Michael Halpern, Randy Holland, David Crockett, Darwin Stapleton, Robert Lykens. third row: Jon Worden, Mark Goldman, Raymond Kelly, Joseph Horowitz. William Barton, fourth row: James Perry (manager), Frank Wright (assistant coach), P. G. Swing (faculty representa- tive), Gomer Davies (head coach), Frank Brown (manager). 7967 lacrosse 205 ilTV% 1967 LACROSSE — first row: E. Wayne Frazer, Frank Briggs. sec- Reedy, Christopher Taylor, James Noyes (assistant coach), fourth ond row: David Rosenbaum, Richard Yeager, John Stewart, row: Fred Hargedon (faculty representative), Raymond Bub, Law- Thomas Coffman (captain), Howard Layton, Stephen Hitchner, rence Smith, William Ladd, William Peterson, Philips Watson, Dexter Farley, Boyd Slomoff. third row: Brooks Cottman (head Michael Lee, Faris Worthington, Joseph Rosenbaum, James coach), Charles Stone, James Waters, Fritz Golden, James Foltz, Buchanan. Daniel Eubank, Joseph Hafkenschiel, George Blankenship, Bruce 7967 tennis 1967 golf 1967 TENNIS — Ed Faulkner, (coach), Andrew Weinstein, Dean 1967 GOLF — Robert Maxym, Stephen Daugert, Jan Van der Roemmich, David Layton, James Predmore (captain), Frank Burns, Sande (co-captain), Jon Fleischaker (co-captain), Paul Prusiner, Robert Kneisley, Kirk Roose, Lewis Gaty (faculty representative). William Livingston, Willis Stetson (coach). 1967 football 1967 FOOTBALL — first row: Lew Elverson (head coach), Richard McCurdy, Fred Montgomery (co-captain), Jon Summerton (co- captain), Eric Blumberg, Chris King, Dexter Farley, Thomas Blackburn (faculty representative), second row: James Lukens (assistant coach), Kevin Northrup, Richard Kamen, Taylor Cope, James Buchanan, Andrew Weinstein, Michael Graves, Frank Burns, Charles Assiff (assistant coach), third row: Richard Jester (equipment), Joe Kelly, John Gorlich, Roy Shanker, John Loven, George Blankenship, Robert O ' Neal, Craig Martin, Theodore Burton, William Barton, Robert McCoach (assistant coach), fourth row: Allan Thomas, Charles Williams, Allen Douglas, Kenneth Mil- ler, James Holland, John Burton, Alex Cilento, Ray Beck, Nathan Wei, Bryer Butler, fifth row: Jerry Whitson, Henry Okarma, Pat Connell, Richard Beatty, Robert Clark, Richard Borgmann. miss- ing: John Busillo, Thomas McLaughlin. 1967 soccer 1967 SOCCER — first row: Roger Wood, Peter Fraser, David Kim, Geoffrey Mwaungulu (co-captain), Paul Levin (co-captain), An- thony Schnelling, Warren Phinney, Fred Feinstein. John McDowell. second row: Willis Stetson (head coach), Garth McDonald (man- ager), James Ribe (manager), Robert Lohr, Ronald Martinez, David Rosenbaum, Lew Miller, Andre Pool, Kenneth Roberts, Peter Izapete (assistant coach), Douglas Thompson (faculty rep- resentative), third row: Donald Stokes, Howard Vickery, Charles Price, Manuel Casanova. 1967 cross-country 207 1967 CROSS-COUNTRY — first row: Paul Peelle. Robert Bartkus fourth row: Sandy Heath (coach), John Field. Gilmore Stott (faculty (co-captain), Peter Rush, Marvin Berg, second row: John Edgar, representative), missing: William Edgar (co-captain), David Hast- John Yinger, Roy Wilber, Robert McKay, third row: John May- ings, Peter Meyer (manager), berry, John Briggs, Ed Bassett, James Colvin, Steven Gordon. 1968 swimming 1968 SWIMMING — left to right: William Hurdle (manager), Dan lomon, John Goldman, Bentley Jenkins, Greg Englund, Al Boni, Eubank (captain), Beryll Sley, Craig Maynard, Bradley Lemke, David Kerr, James McAdoo (coach), missing: John Rolle. Steven Zimmerman, Ken Meiklejohn, Robert Briggs, Duncan Hoi- 208 1968 basketball fc-tf igr = = V eV ift 1968 BASKETBALL — first row: William Miller, Richard Beppler, John Burton, J D Hoffstem (coach), missing: Don Mizell, Paul Frank Burns, Jerry Whitson, John Swanson. second row: Michael Shechtman Sullivan (manager), Craig DeSha, James Clymer, Kenneth Jewell, 1968 wrestling 1968 WRESTLING — first row: Leonard Nakamura. Robert McKay. Roger Wood, William Greiner, Bruce Campbell, Robert Scheiber, Mark Proctor second row: Ron Krall (manager), Alan Robin, Steven Shatzkin, Dan Nussbaum (co-captain), Alan Mitchell, Gary Nussbaum, Allan Thomas, Fred Montgomery (co-captain), John Byers, Eric Blumberg, Gomer Davies (coach) missing: Jeff Carter, Hank Levy, Mark Smith 1967 hockey 209 1967 HOCKEY — kneeling: Sarah Gregory (manager), Debby Frazer (co-captain), Barbara Rickards (co-captain), Eleanor Hess (coach), standing: Barbara Gibson, Frances Batzer, Sandy McLanahan, Arlene Zarembka, Sandra Burnstein, Ann Smith, Lucinda Lewis, Connie Cole. Connie Fleming. Trudy Pomerantz, Barbara Briggs, Carol Prixton, Lissa Schairer, Debby Kirk, Pat O ' Regan, Chris Doty, Barbara Hunter, Jean Murdock. 1967 lacrosse 1967 tennis 1967 LACROSSE — kneeling: Kathleen Swift, Paula Lawrence (co-captain), Betty Bixler (co-captain), Sarah Gregory, Debby Frazer, Barbara Rickards. standing: Eleanor Hess, Judy Bartella, Luisa Beck, Barbara Skavinsky. Pat O ' Regan, Kathy MacLeod, Barbara Briggs, Barbara Bell, Emily Albrink, Edna llyin, Julia Wenner, Laura Enion, Barbara Merrill, Helen Lorn, Linda Turner (manager). 1967 TENNIS — foreground: Chris Grant, sitting: Judy Gray- beal (captain), Marianne Mithun. Dorothy Duncan, standing: Lissa Schairer, Mary Good, Peggy Sears, Belle Vreeland, Arlene Zarembka, Claudia Chanlett, Spencer Ford. Lucha Hill, Ailyn Terada (coach). 210 1967 water ballet 1967 WATER BALLET — first row: Jan Allison, Merry Hunt, Eileen Farrell, Jean Warren, Debbie Zubow. second row: Bob Diprete, Julie Biddle, Lyn Peery, Lucha Hill, third row: Sandy Zimmerman, Mary Ann Simmons, Beth Jones, Bentley Jenkins, Al Bom fourth row: Diana Pennell (co-captain), Debbie Seeley (co-captain), Wendy Hyatt, Ailyn Terada (coach) fifth row: Tim Keith-Lucas. Joyce Whalen, Pete Dikeman, Brad Lemke. miss- ing: Em ily Albrink, Margy Allen, Jan Archer, Barb Atkm. Deborah Bond, Teru Morton, Al Prager. Susan Scott, Jan Scriver, Kathy Sharp, Avery Taylor, Tina Tohns, Mary Von- Dorster, Lyn West, 1968 badminton 1968 swimming 1968 BADMINTON — first row: Chris Grant, Cindy Lewis second row: Maggie Reece, Mary Lou Bannister, Joanne Luoto, Kathy Setlow, Arlene Zarembka, third row: Leda Johnson, Chitra Yang, Barbara Briggs, Pat O Regan, Margaret Browning, Eleanor Hess (coach), missing: Kris Anderson, Chris Doty, Bar- bara Hunter, Ann Judd, Path O Brien, Trudy Pomerantz, Ed Faulkner (coach). 1968 SWIMMING — first row: Barbara Gerner, Mary Good. Edie Garrison. Bambi Jones, Wendy Dixon second row: Tern Mc- Curdy. Beth Jones, Lucha Hill, Mary Ann Simmons. Laura Enion missing: PheePhee Brown, Sally Haines, Cynthia Ber- trand. Teru Morton, Anne Newman. Lindsay Richards, Sue Schug, Debbie Seeley, Meredith Shedd, Paula Spilner, Mary VonDorster, Julia Wenner. 1968 basketball 211 1968 BASKETBALL — first row: Avery Taylor, Fran Hostettler, Sarah Gregory, Linda Frommer, Margaret Kohn, Sandy Reyn- olds, second row: Lynn West (manager), Lisa Schairer, Betty Bird, Joanna Booser, Cheryl Thompson, Judy Cutwright. Ann Judd (manager), third row: Joyce Frisby, Barbara Gard, Sue Vi veil, Maizie Hough, Mary Stott, Irene Moll (coach), Emily Albrink. missing: Margore Capron. 1968 volleyball 1968 modern dance 1968 VOLLEYBALL— first row: Marsha Bera, Caroline Robin- son, Kate Hodgkin. second row: Edna I ly in, Jeanne Harrison, Irene Moll (coach), missing: Harriet Butts, Mary Cornish, Jes- sica Gross, Ava Harris, Alexandra Polyzopoulos, Sheryl Sebas- tian, Sue Vivell (captain), Susan Werth, Jenna Will. 1968 MODERN DANCE — first row: Ann Kanter, Lyn Peery, Sheela Fertig, Freda Shen, Barbara Boardman, Susan Scott. second row: Martha Oliphant, Karen Ro sin, Terry Kennedy, Merry Hunt, Debbie Roberts, Shelly Fisher, Lynn Edlin, Connie Fleming, third row: Bruce Bush, Margaret Jann, Martha Hol- linger, Frank Weideman, Sarah Moore, Ailyn Terada (coach), John Fahnestock, Susan Bonthron, Susan Foster, Monica Car- sky, Martha Leary (co-chairman), Mike Greenwald. delta upsilon fall president Jon Summerton spring president Randy Larrimore seniors Dick Andrews Bob Bartkus Sam Brackeen Joe Hafkenschiel Dave Kim Chris King Dick McCurdy Fred Montgomery Wayne Patterson Jim Perry Joe Rosenbaum Larry Smith Jon Summerton Faris Worthington juniors Joe Boches Buck Buchanan Taylor Cope Davy Crockett Jon Ellis Tom Hafkenschiel George Harrison Dave Hilgers Randy Holland Dick Kamen Randy Larrimore Lance Leithauser John Rogers Bob Sprogell Roger Wood Andy Weinstein Roy Wilber sophomores Bill Barton Wally Bond Duffy Burns Chip Burton John Busillo Steve Carr John Gorlich Jim Kimmel Mike Lee Brad Lemke Bob Lowe Craig Martin Gary Moss Kevin Northrup Mike O ' Neal Bill Pichardo Jeff Remmel Dean Roemmich Steve Shatzkin Phil Watson Joe Kelly freshmen Rick Beaty John Burton Jim Clymer Pete Costello Craig DeSha Al Douglas John Goldman Jim Holland Ken Jewell Tom McLaughlin Chip Merrill Ken Miller Gery Nussbaum Paul Shectman Jim Stark Mike Sullivan Ji hn Swans ' m Al Thomas Jed Williams Rich Wolfe seniors D. Ren Brown Frank Brown Al Davis Lynn Etheredge Dan Eubank Carl Goodwin Mike Halpern Dick Kast Ken Shell Neal Sherman Joe Wilson Bill Zimmer juniors Mark Alexander Don Fujihara Gary Hill Chip Hollister Ron Krall John Lohr Lyle Snider Pete Zimmerman sophomores Mike Aldrich John Bennet Doug Blair John Byers Phil Callis Mike Cooper Dave Foster Tim Gardner Mark Goldman Fritts Golden Bill Ladd Bob Lohr Rob Lykens Guy McLean Bob Mellman Mike Seligman Jeff Spielberg Paul Zelnick freshmen Tom Bates Andy Gordon Dave Hough Jeff Jordan Steve Melov Scott Minor Bob Osborne Ken Oye RobPritchard Marc Proctor RichSchall Murdock Smith Pete Solar tau alpha omicron fall president Ken Shell spring president Al Davis fall president Paul McMahon spring president Eric Blumberg seniors Eric Blumberg Bruce Rockwood Dave Singleton juniors David Avila Steve Cook Pete Dikeman Mike Graves Paul McMahon Tom O ' Donnell John Perdue Rich Rmaldi sophomores George Blankenship Allen Boni Manuel Casanova George Clairmont RickGulotta Bill Holt Harry lukowitz Bentley Jenkins Hank Jones Noble Jones Ben Kuipers John Loven John Marshall Larry Palmer Andre Pool Paul Pruisner Roy Shanker Royer Smith Art Suskin Anand Yang Burt Zurer freshmen Jon Barber Ray Beck Mark Bloomfield Luis Booth Bryan Butler Elliot Carlen Bob Chase Bob Clark Geoffrey Greene Earle Hales Charles Helleloid Addison Lee Don Mizell Ray Mullins Hank O ' Karma George Reed David Schleidlinger David Slansky Ben Sley Nathan Wei Jerry Whitson Guy Yates .f. sSs ssa imaaaaa Hm kappa sigma pi 215 fall president Chris Taylor spring president Mark Dean seniors: George Gill, John Seidenfeld. juniors: Mark Dean, Clint Etheridge. Bill Miller, Paul Peelle, Chris Taylor. sophomore: Allen Shlaifer. freshmen: Alex Cilento, Pat Connell, Pete Cooke, Bob Cushman, Steve Lowe, Jon Ott, Dan Thompson, Dan Wasserman. phi sigma kappa fall president Bob Hoe spring president Dave Duncan seniors: Bruce Conner, Bob Hoe, Bob MacLeod, John Oldenburg, Bill Peterson, Bruce Reedy, juniors: Dave Duncan, Ted Eisenberg, Al Lee, Bob Maxym, Darwin Stapleton. sophomores: Frank Easterbrook, John Gilbert, Wilber Greenhouse, Dale Hughes, Steve Marion, Harvey Miller, Jim Robinson, John Stevens, Tom Warrington, freshmen: John Baer. Richard Daley, Sonny Dorian, Scott Hardwig, Bruce Hogel. Clyde Jenkins, David Kerr, Steve Kerr, Doug Komer, John Lax, Fred Leader, Ben Liu, John Palmer, Martin Putnam, Bill Ryan, Pete Welch. the phoenix fall editor-in-chief: John F. Lohr managing editors Robert Goodman Jeff Spielberg spring editor-in-chief: Robert Goodman managing editors Galen Fisher Lannie Hauptman 217 student council first semester: Nancy Bekavac, Ren Brown, Dave Cohen, Kathy Conner, Greg Englund, Lynn Etheredge (vice-president), Fred Feinstein, Danny Nussbaum, Kirk Roose, Peter Rush, Barry Wohl (president). second semester: Nancy Bekavac, Dave Cohen, Fred Feinstein (vice-president), Debby Frazer, Carl Kendall, Hank Levy, Danny Nussbaum, Ken Roberts, Kirk Roose (president), Ellen Schall, Lyle Snider, Roger Wood. judiciary committees COLLEGE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, first semester: Kathy Conner, Ellen Daniell, John Yinger, Barry Wohl. second semester: Kathy Conner, Liza Crawford, Peter Warrington, Barry Wohl. STUDENT JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, first semester: Rika Alper (chairman), Audrey Melkin, Lyle Snider, Bob Snow, Peter Meyer, second semester: Audrey Melkin, Diana Wickes, Al Dietrich, Bob Snow. WOMEN ' S JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, first semester: Jean McLauglin (chairman), Penny Bellamy, Jacqueline Ellis, Frances Hostettler, Margaret Kohn, Lindsay Richards, Ellen Schall. second semester: Fran Hostettler (chairman), Penny Bellamy, Margaret Kohn, Ellen Schall, Lorie Bernstein, Beverly Lyon, Ann Shepardson. MENS JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, first semester: Lyle Snider (chairman), Greg Englund, Bob Goodman, Paul Peelle. second semester: Paul Peelle (chairman), Greg Englund, Bob Goodman, Fritz Golden, Ron Krall. 218 seniors Adamson, Walter, 194 Albrink, Emily, 188 Alexander, Michael, 178 Allen, Andrea, n.p. Alloy, Stephen, n.p. Almy, Susan, 200 Andrews. Richard T., 194 Asch, Adrienne, 171 Babrauskas, Vytenis, n.p. Baker, Stannard, 178 Bannister, Mary Lee, 157 Bartkus, Robert E., 163 Battle, Edwin, 171 Batzer, Frances, 176 Benham, Craig, n.p. Bennett, Nancy, 176 Bera, Marsha, 184 Biddle, Julie, 197 Blumberg, Eric, 200 Botsford, Daniel, 194 Bowers, Mary, 197 Brackeen, Samuel, n.p. Brauch, Alfred, 188 Brett, Diane, 184 Brezak, Agnes, 157 Brower, Emily, 176 Brown, D. Ren, 178 Brown, Frank, 194 Cadmus, Robert, 191 Cannon, Melissa, 171 Carter, Jeff, 171 Chadwick, David, n.p. Chucuyan, Carlos, 166 Cohen, David, 171 Conner, Katherine, 200 Connor, Bruce, 166 Courant, Paul, 178 Creasey, Linda, 176 Darr, Robin, 176 Davis, Albert, 163 Davis, Karen, 177 Dewald, Jonathan, 179 Diamond, Ronald, 197 Domjan, Alma, 160 Dorsey, William, 200 Durham, Maureen, 200 Edgar, William, 179 Eichhorn, Nancy, 171 Elias, Norma, 179 Etheredge, Lynn, 163 Eubank, Daniel, 163 Farley, Dexter, Jr., n.p. Feinstein, Ellis, 184 Feldman, Barry, n.p. Figiel, Richard, 171 Fink, Arthur, 191 Finzer, William, 191 Fischer, Donna, 171 Floto„ Charles, 188 Fraser, Peter, 179 Frisby, Joyce, 185 Gard, Barbara, 189 Gibson, Susan, 172 Gill, George, n.p. Giveans, Glenna, 186 Goodwin, Carl, 179 Gregor, Richard, 166 Guilmartin, Kenneth, n.p. Gutterman, Peter, 180 Hafkenschiel, Joseph, 164 Haines, Jennifer, 157 Hall, Kathleen, 172 Hall, Sarah, 201 Halpern, Michael, 194 Hastings, David, 157 Healy, Terry, 172 Heisler, Harriet, 201 Hillson, Roger, 166 Hoe, Robert, 167 Holum, Robert, 164 Horsting, Paul, 172 Hurd, Bronwyn, n.p. Hyatt, Wendy, 201 Ingram, Joan Bailey, 164 Jewell, Jane, 195 Jones, Carolyn, 162 Jones, Meredith, 165 Kaplan, Jay, n.p. Kast, Richard, 191 Keith, Donne, 180 Keith-Lucas, Timothy, 198 Kim, David, 157 King, Christopher, 201 Klennin, Emily, 186 Kwalwasser, Harold, 195 Larner, Katherine, 180 Larsen, T. Kermit, 198 Layne, Patricia, 172 Leavin, Paul, n.p. Leu, Lucy, 186 Leva, Leo, 158 Levering, Susan Dworkin, n.p. Lidoff, Lorraine, 189 Lieberman, Rona, 198 Lopez-Monllas, Julian, 172 Luborsky, Lisa, 162 Lutton, Lewis, n.p. MacLeod, Kathy Jean, 172 MacLeod, Robert, n.p. Maraniss, Jean, 187 Mather, John, 192 McClain, Ray P., 180 McCurdy, Richard, 185 McDiarmid, John, 180 McDonnell, Daphne, 202 McLanahan, Sandra, 202 McLaughlin, Jean, 158 Meiklejohn, Nanine, 180 Melbourne, John, 158 Meyer, Peter, 180 Miller, Christopher, 192 Miller, Lenore, 202 Miller, Sandra, 202 Miller, V. James, 167 Montgomery, Fred, 165 Morgan, Robert, Jr., n.p. Morse, Eleanor, 172 Moscovitz, Seymour, 175 Mwaungulu, Geoffrey, 158 Nagel, Robert, 196 Nevling, Barbara, 189 Newcomb, Elaine, 177 Oldenburg, John, 167 Orr, Leonard, 189 Parrish, Lawrence, 180 Patterson, Wayne, 182 Pepper, Nancy, 175 Perry, James M., 175 Peterson, William, 165 Pollack. Robert, 158 Pollock, Robert, n.p. Prichard, Jane, 202 Prmzhorn, Paul, 190 Racine, Frances, n.p. Reed, J. David, 182 Reedy, Bruce, 196 Rickards, Barbara, 177 Roberti, Tony, 182 Robertson, R. Philip, 187 Rockwood, Bruce, 183 Roose, Kirk, 190 Roper, Robert, 183 Rosenbaum, Joseph, 185 Royce, Diana, 175 Russell, Susan, 175 Sanders, Lee, 160 Sarmiento, Jorge, 160 Schairer, John, 192 Schneider, Lucy, 175 Schnelling, Anthony, n.p. Schrauf, Craig, n.p. Seidenfeld, John, n.p. Shell, Kenneth, 161 Shepherd, Samuel, 202 Sherman, Neal, 196 Shloss, Carol, 175 Singleton, David, 202 Smith, Lawrence, 192 Smith, Mark, 195 Smith, Susan, 183 Solberg, Mary, 183 Sonnenfeld, Marc, 165 Stanton, William, n.p. Steever, Sarah, 177 Steinbrook, Susan Gelletly, n.p. Streams, Wilbur, 167 Summerton, Jonathan, 165 Suter, Robert, 158 Swanson, David, 193 Szilagyi, Maria, n.p. Talmage, Carol Jean, 168 Talmage, John Vanneste, 168 Tanaka, Joya, 196 Teutsch, Ralph, n.p. Theim, Barbara, 190 Thim, Paul, 175 Thornton, Joseph, 175 Tift, Bruce, 202 Tollins, Patricia, 158 Updike, Margaret, 199 Warren, Jean, 193 Waters, James, 199 Webster, Corinne, 199 Weisel, John W., 168 Welte, Roberta, 199 Whalen, Joyce, 161 Wilson, Joseph, 165 Wolf, Thomas, n.p. Worthington, Faris, 185 Xydis, George, 177 Yablick, Gary, 169 Yang, Chitra, 158 Young, Edith, 190 Zimmer, Peter, 169 faculty Artin, Thomas, 174 lower left Asensio, Elisa, 186 lower left Bannister, Robert, 183 top Barr, Robert, 155 Barus, Carl, 169 bottom Beardsley, Monroe, 190 bottom Becker, George, 173 center right Beik, Paul, 183 bottom Bilaniuk, Olexa-Myron, 193 upper right Blackburn, Thomas, 170 upper right Boccio, John, 192 center Bowler, David, 168 top Bradley, Thompson, 187 lower left Bramson, Leon, 201 Brinkmann, Heinrich, 184 lower left Cantrell, Cyrus, 192 upper right Carpenter, Samuel, 167 Cobbs, Susan P., 155 Cohn, Hilde, 187 center right Cowden, David, 170 right Cratsley, Edward, 154 diFranco, Roland, 185 top Elmore, William, 191 top Enders, Robert K., 158 Fehnel, Edward A., 160 bottom Field, John, 178 upper Flemister, Launce, 159 right center Gaty, Lewis, 164 right Gergen, Kenneth, 198 top Gilbert, Charles, 195 left Hammons, James, 161 left center Hargadon, Frederick, 165 upper right Hawkins, Thomas, 184 bottom Heckscher, Stevens, 185 center Henry, Nannerl, 195 right Henry, Patrick, 190 top Hoenigswald, Gabriele, 162 lower right Hopkins, Raymond, 196 top Hutchinson, James, 161 right center Hynes, Samuel, 174 upper right Keighton, Walter B., 160 top Kitao, Timothy, 176 center Klotz, Eugene, 184 upper right Korn, Peggy, 181 upper Lafore, Laurence, 181 lower left Lang, Olga, 187 left center Lange, Barbara P., 155 Legesse, Asmarom, 202 top Levin, Gerald, 198 bottom Lippincot, Sarah Lee, 156 lower right Livingston, Luzerne G., 159 center left Manglesdorf, Clark, 167 lower right Manglesdorf, Paul, 192 top Mansbach, Richard, 196 center McCrum, John, 168 left McCully, George, 181 lower right McLaren, Margaret, 156 center left McLaughlin, John, 173 lower right Meinkoth, Norman A., 157 top Mitchell, Ronald, 161 upper left Morrill, Bernard, 169 upper left Nevin, John Anthony, 199 219 Nielson, Clair, 191 bottom North, Helen, 162 upper right Novik, Victor, 202 bottom Oberdeik, Hans, 190 center Ostwald, Martin, 162 upper left Pagliaro, Harold, 174 lower right Patrick, John, 164 lower right Patterson, C. Stuart Jr., 166 top Peabody, Dean, 197 upper Pennock, J. Roland, 194 Perkens, Jean, 186 left center Pierson, Frank, 163 center Piker, Steven, 200 top Pryor, Frederic, 165 top Raff, Charles, 189 bottom Rawson, Kenneth S., 159 bottom Rhys, Hedley, 176 top Rosen, David, 184 lower right Rosenberg, Alburt, 191 bottom Saffran, Bernard, 164 upper left Savage, Robert, 159 top Schuldenfrei, Richard, 189 top Schultz, Victor, 169 upper right Shane, Joseph P., 154 Shatagin, Helen, 187 lower right Skeath, J. Edward, 184 upper right Smith, David, 196 bottom Smith, Courtney Craig, 154 Smith, Simone, 187 upper left Snyder, Susan, 173 left Southworth, Marie, 186 right center Speis, Claudio, 188 top Stott, Gilmore, 155 Summers, Helen, 165 bottom Swing, Peter Gram, 188 bottom Sylvester, David, 177 top Tafoya, Frances, 186 top Terdiman, Richard, 186 lower left Thompson, Douglas, 165 lower center Thompson, Nicholas, 197 bottom Thompson, Peter T., 161 center Tolles, Frederick, 179 Urban, P. Linwood, 189 center Van Til, Jon, 200 lower van de Kamp, Peter, 156 lower center Walker, Robert, 177 bottom Wallace, Emily, 170 lower left Weber, Neal A., 157 bottom Wilcox, Clair, 163 top Williams, John, 176 bottom Williamson, John, 178 bottom Willis, M. Joseph, 166 bottom Wood, James, 184 center Wright, Harrison, 182 220 CONGRATULATIONS from Michael ' s College Pharmacy — — — — — — — — — —  ■ — — ((SINCE 191 ) — Your Headquarters for Rug Cleaning, Repairs, and Storage 100 Park Avenue, Swarthmore, Penn. KIngswood 3-6000 M.A.B. PAINTS ART SUPPLIES SWARTHMORE HARDWARE I I South Chester Road Housewares Black Decker Tools SWARTHMORE PRINTING CO. Commercial Printing (2nd Floor — Co-op Store Bldg.) 401 Dartmouth Avenue Swarthmore, Pa. KI 3-1290 EDWARD L NOYES CO., INC j INSURANCE REAL ESTATE Ed Noyes— ' 3 1 Jean Noyes — ' 32 Jim Noyes Ron Noyes Lee Gatewood 221 DAVID CHARLES Distinctive Hair Styling Area Coverage Since 1885 Colonial Court Apartments Swarthmore, Pa. (Next to Post Office) Phone K 1 4-51 00 — K 13-9700 CONGRATULATIONS TO THE CLASS OF 1968 THE PARK AVENUE SHOP CONGRATULATIONS TO THE CLASS OF 1968 xmi o 03 C3 ■jc o Uj a 417 Dartmouth Avenue Swarthmore, Pa. KIngswood 3-0926 SWARTHMORE 5 10 222 senior portraits by JEAN SARDOU STUDIOS STRAWBRIDGE CLOTHIER Springfield, Pennsylvania WITH BEST WISHES FROM A FORMER HALCYON BUSINESS MANAGER A i .  St n ton i o J BARBER SHOP LATEST HAIR STYLES FOR MEN Kl 3-9938 COLONIAL COURT APTS. SWARTHMORE, PA. Next to Post Office LOwell 6-6250 media office supply co. Commercial Social Stationers from a paper clip to a complete office Greeting Cards - Gifts Drafting Supplies 11-13 West State Street Media, Pa. The Friendly Restaurant 121 BALTIMORE PIKE SPRINGFIELD, PA. Everybody ' s Favorite Also Featuring Dinner Platters KI 4-7797 RDBERT ' S JEWELERS REGIS TERED 3 ££fc.i.ari£ U iamondi. Lngi. Cor Stats a South Ave MEDIA. PA. 19063 LOWELL 6-0981 223 PROVIDENT NATIONAL BANK SWARTHMORE OFFICE KI 3-1431 Students Accounts Invited Member Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation o do w e • Fri. and Sat. Dancing • Meeting Rooms • Delightful Restaurant • Cocktail Lounge • Wedding Receptions • Banquets 104 Rooms LO 6-9600 1 124 W. Baltimore Ave., Media, Pa. TR 2-9711 STACKY ' S SANDWICH SHOP Steaks • Hoagies 211 CONCORD AVE. CHESTER, PA. (Next to Wade House) THE FOUNTAIN Lunches Dinners Snacks Sandwiches Shakes Sundaes Ice Cream Coke Open every day evening Across from Swarthmore Railroad Station 224 @to[l© Uu1J!xJ ! £)£i editor-in-chief: Robert Bartkus managing editor: Frank Easterbrook literary editor: Nancy Bekavac business manager: Roger Wood libraries editor: John Bennett student life editor: Barbara Skavinsky social action editor: Linda Lee the arts editor: Merry Hunt academics editor: Robert Maxym seniors editor: Stannard Baker photography staff: Neal Sherman, Lee Sanders, William Dorsey, Charles Floto, James Robinson, Kathy Hood, Merry Hunt, Arlene Zarembka, Matthew Coleman, Robyn McLaughlin, Robert Cadmus, Mike Gray. Jorge Sarmiento, ' Galen Fisher. William Shorter, Frank Easterbrook. ' darkroom staff also contributors: Courtney Smith, Dave Cohen, Mike Schudson, Nancy Bekavac, Lynn Etheredge, Robert Barr, Greg Englund. Paul Leavin, Lew Lutton, Dan Nussbaum. Bruce Reedy, Kirk Roose, Craig DeSha. Andy Wemstein, John Yinger, Francme Cardman. with special thanks to: Joseph Crl I ley, Charles Kurillo, Hester McKee, and P. David Tan. @ This book primed by VELVATONE. a special process of litho graphic priming. Sole producers: Wm. J. Keller Inc., Buffalo, N. Y. No other pruning firm is authorized to use ihc Velvatone method. I