Stanford University - Quad Yearbook (Palo Alto, CA)

Text from Pages 1 - 496 of the 1970 volume:

-- • • A� - the 1970 sbnfqdquad RALPH C. PETERSEN WILLIAM R. ADAMS NEAL CAVANAUGH EDITOR BUSINESS MANAGER HEAD PHOTOGRAPHER 7 7 0 Owned and published by the Associated Students of Stanford University, Stanford, Californio. Copyright 1970 by the Associated Students of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Printed in tho United States of America. 1 Each of us, in his own way, will express his support on those days. Some of us will cancel or reschedule classes; all of us, in some fashion, will refrain from 'business as usual' in order to work actively against the war. -Fifty-five professors and thirty-five staff members pledging their support to the goals of the November Moratorium 2 3 4 5 6 It's our own booze and we can't even get at it. —Presidential Assistant Willard Wyman re: the A.B.C. crackdown liquor at the Faculty Club 7 8 It is the policy of Stanford University not to schedule events with institutions which practice discrimination on the basis of race or national origin, or which are affiliated with or sponsored by institutions which do so. —President Pitzer announcing the decision to terminate athletic scheduling with BYU 9 10 I don't think the President can be affected by a mass demonstration of any kind. —a White House spokesman 11 12 If you're old enough and have learned from experience, your self-discipline is going to be good and correct; but if your inner discipline is wrong, the right kind of discipline must be enforced on you. In Rome, the slaves got all the money and the workers became the slaves. The society collapsed. I see the same thing happening here with our own federal government. Our society is the greatest one in the world and it is worth saving. It is a simple world which we are making too damn complicated. —Payton Jordan on Youth and America 13 Yes, the ratio works wonders; Sally Stanford eats it up, marvels in the euphoric ecstacy of knowing that you are just one of the 2.1 males who are after her body at any given instant. She can discard you at will, or she can keep you around just long enough to inflate her already bloated ego to new levels of elasticity and new nadirs of sensitivity. The ice-cold shield always seems to be there, the candy coated plain chocolate that outdoes even M M's—it never, never melts. —a disappointed freshman 14 15 16 I now go forth to the smithy of my soul to forge the uncreated conscience of my race. —William Sloane Coffin speaking at Mem Chu 17 18 19 20 What we need at Stanford is more newspapers and one less government. —Harvey Hukari 21 It's like a brother-sister relationship with sexual overtones. Everything is really relaxed and casual. At first it was sort of a forced relaxed. Now it's sort of like a family. We see the boys as friends, not dates. If something happens, it just does. -a coed dorm resident 23 I noted, which seemed to be the ultimate in bad taste, they even had a political speaker speaking in the Stanford Chapel. I have always thought that this is one place which was removed from the realm of politics and bad taste; but apparently that had 'gone the way of all flesh,' along with the school itself. —Paul E. Jackson '26 in a letter to the OBSERVER 24 How can you address the love of God to the problems of existence without speaking to the social and political issues which concern us? The prophets spoke of God as the Holy One in your midst. If he's not in your midst, why bother to speak about him at all? —Dean B. Davie Napier 25 26 These students suddenly felt as if they had been owned all their lives. Using money as a control shows there is really nothing left—there's no love, no understanding. —Barbara Hyland, a member of a Parents Day panel, noting the Stanford students involved in last spring's demonstrations whose parents removed their financial support. 27 The underlying principles are two. First, that freshmen should be full citizens of the University and not 13th grade high school students; second, that there is no discoverable norm for The Educated Man but there are many ways of becoming educated men and women. —Professor William Clebsch speaking about General Studies reform. 28 There is more real concern with the substance or essence of things and less with their form. —John Black, Director of Stanford's Counseling and Testing Center, on the college student of the Seventies. 29 30 Change at Stanford in the last four years has led to the removal of institutional restraints. You will have a wide range of choices and you must provide direction to the choices you make through self-awareness and self-discipline... You must take responsibility for your own education. The University exists to help you get the education you desire. —Council of Presidents member John Grube speaking to incoming freshman. 31 An academic institution is not always the best place for a truly creative person. —Dean of Admissions Hargadon News and Opinion The following pages review the news events of this Stanford year through April 20th, when the book went into final production. But the events were only part of this year's news. The reasoning behind the actions, and the issues which never became events, were perhaps more important to what Stanford was this year than the happenings. The 1970 QUAD presents, in four sections throughout the book, opinion articles concerning various campus issues, written by people involved in those issues. In many cases more than one article about an issue is included; it is not our intention that these articles be set in direct opposition to each other, but rather that they represent different viewpoints. It has been a year of politics, talk, and change. By including a selection of opinion articles, the QUAD hopes to give its coverage more depth. 33 As a matter of highest priority, the University should undertake the construction of new co-educational residences for about 500 undergraduates. —SES Committee on Housing About 6000 students sought off-campus housing in the fall. Many students had to seek housing off-campus due to the housing shortage on campus. A majority of these unconvenienced students complained that apartment owners had drastically raised their rents over last year to take advantage of the shortage situation on campus. Hardest hit by the squeeze were graduate students and transfers. Many of these students spent their September days searching for a place to live. A Housing Clearing House was set up in Serra House and 500 students were housed there in Stern Hall while they searched for a place to live off-campus. Although the construction of Manzanita Park (the new trailer complex) accommodated 464 additional students, it did not ease the graduate housing problem, as most of the trailer residents were undergraduates. Nevertheless, all who live in Manzanita are pleased with the advantage of being able to live on campus in an off-campus atmosphere. Stanford has not built any new general housing for at least ten years, with the exception of the two new fraternity clusters. The University does not want to spend any money for permanent housing until it can ascertain which type of living facility would be most desired by Stanford students. Stanford has no new residences scheduled for completion after the Escondido Four Project is finished in August 1971. Growing interest in co-ed living led to the creation of co-ed corridors in Roble and Toyon. Loro and Paloma, all freshman housed segregated by sex, reshuffled in January to form the first co-ed houses in Florence Moore. 34 Dear Colleagues, I know you are aware that confidential salary information and faculty evaluations stolen from the University have been distributed on campus and elsewhere... —President Kenneth Pitzer Confidential records of faculty and administration salaries mysteriously appeared in mimeographed form courtesy of the Underground Press on October 27, 1969. Distribution of the figures stolen during last May's Encina sit-in was perhaps the most extensive and potentially explosive revelation of internal University workings in Stanford history. One particularly embarrassing item circulated were five confidential faculty evaluation documents. President Pitzer announced that his administration would explore all appropriate legal steps to prevent publication of this confidential and personal information. The motion to print the stolen salary data was voted down by a narrow 16-14 margin at the November 17th meeting of the ASSU Senate. But despite the defeat, the salary data will remain in the official Senate meeting minutes. 35 We're four people who believe in trying to work through the system to achieve change and what this means is that you have to have more than one person... All we had to do was look at Denis Hayes—he was exhausted. —Barry Askinas When the dust from the political confrontations of last spring finally settled, elections were held to select a successor to the exhausted Denis Hayes. Barry Ashinas, John Grube, Joyce Kobayashi and Pat Shea were elected to the Presidency as a Council of Presidents. Their election brought effective executive management to the ASSU. Expansion of the executive allowed an even more productive response to student desire and at the same time provided for a greater clarification of the administration's goals. This more efficient liaison may prevent future discontent and crises. Pat Shea became the group's spokesman. He concentrated his efforts on trustee relations to the campus and facilitated relations between other members of the community. John Grube was in charge of alumni-student relations and was also interested in compiling course and teacher evaluations. The evaluations were published during winter quarter. But more important, Grube was largely responsible for the revitalization of committees in the ASSU. Joyce Kobayashi worked for educational reform with the goal of developing a student center for independent projects. She helped to set up SWOPSI (Student Workshops on Political and Social Issues), a series of student and faculty initiated courses with concerns ranging from logging policies in California to disarmament negotiations. Along with her SWOPSI plans Joyce is trying to integrate the Volunteer Services Center into classroom courses so that students can receive credit for their outside volunteer work. She also, quite naturally, represents women's needs in the ASSU. She cites the problem of no part-time graduate programs for women with families as one of her concerns. Barry Askinas, burdened with a doctoral dissertation and other jobs, was the least noticeable member of the Council. Askinas, a former chairman of the Graduate Students' Association, looked into the problems of graduate education and was instrumental in insuring construction of temporary housing for 500 students in Manzanita Park and the plans for enlarged graduate housing in Escondido Village. He also focused his attention on the controversial Overseas Campuses Program. Askinas summed up the Council's work: There are also executive, representative, organizational and innovative duties. If the Council of Presidents has made any contribution to the University, it's because those other areas have been taken care of. 36 I'm biased —David C. Edwards, Chairman of ASSU Senate The new ASSU Senate debuted this fall as the successor to the inefficient LASSU. The elections early in October generated a great deal of interest and the forty-man legislature was selected from 125 candidates representing the various departments of the University. The Senate elected David C. Edwards, a prominent member of the BSU, as chairman. Edwards, a loser in the first senatorial race, felt that his election to the chairmanship would result in fewer house feuds among various factions of the legislature. The Senate spent most of its early sessions setting up organizational procedure, by laws and committees. The first item of real business was the confirming of the ASSU budget. The Senate Committee on Finance proposed a figure late in November. The Senate, having little faith in this figure, threw it out. The senators by and large considered the budget too low and set about to appropriate more money. The budget was approved on February 2, 1970. The voting hinted at the end of the Senate coalition between the white radicals and the blacks. The BSU holds the only real power-bloc in the Senate with eight votes. This new Senate, says ASSU President John Grube, should be considered a transitional body in hopes that a more community-oriented government will develop at Stanford with student, faculty and administration working together in one legislature. 37 38 If the war continues and there is no firm commitment to an early withdrawal of all American troops, either unilaterally or through negotiations, then we plan to have a two-day Moratorium in November, a three-day Moratorium in December... —Faculty Petition against the War October 15 was the first Moratorium Day—a nationwide attempt to actively express dissatisfaction with the United States' continued involvement in S.E. Asia and President Nixon's policy of gradual withdrawal. President Pitzer, after ignoring the ASSU Senate mandate to suspend classes on this day, expressed sympathy for the Vietnam Moratorium but withheld formal University support. The ASSU Senate responded after lengthy debate by passing a resolution supporting President Pitzer's statement. Over 200 faculty members signed a petition against the war. Most Stanford students did not attend classes, choosing to leaflet and talk to the people in the surrounding areas. Five thousand students and local residents participated in a noon peace march in Palo Alto. Canvassers generally received polite but apathetic responses. Most area residents revealed few details of their own positions. Some called students Commie dupes and agents of Hanoi. The rainy day did not prevent a rally that evening. An overflow of crowds heard Congressmen Don Edwards and Pete McCloskey, black editor and publisher Carlton Goodlet, and Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling speak out against the war in Memorial Auditorium and Memorial Church. Moratorium activity rekindled again on Thursday, November 13 and culminated that Saturday with peace marches in New York, Washington and San Francisco. The Stanford contingent in San Francisco was part of the 100,000 that heard Ralph Abernathy, David Hilliard, Crosby, Stills and Nash, Buffy St. Marie and Phil Ochs. In all major U.S. cities, patriotism was a dominant theme as many middle-aged people swelled the ranks of protesters. Gee, yesterday I was a hippie communist and now I'm a patriot, one bearded, beaded demonstrator chuckled. 39 To promote greater communication between national political leaders and the Stanford Community. —Jerry Offstein, Political Union Board Considerable controversy surrounded the Political Union's budget this fall. The Associated Students was considering judicial action against Roger Reed, head of the Political Union, to determine responsibility for paying over $3,500 in speakers. The controversy centered around contracts for speeches delivered last fall by N.Y. Times editor Harrison Salisbury, Senator Barry Goldwater, and author William F. Buckley. Reed contracted for the speeches in the summer. In anticipation a $5,000 Political Union budget from the ASSU, Reed signed the contracts, unaware that the contracts required a counter-signature by the Student Financial manager, David Swift. Despite the financial dispute, the Political Union Board provided an excellent range of speakers for its political symposium this fall entitled America on the Threshold of the Seventies. New York Times editor Harrison Salisbury began the symposium when he addressed an audience of 700. He pointed out: There is a military stalemate and neither side can knock the other out... we shouldn't expect to achieve in diplomatic negotiations something we couldn't achieve by arms... do we want an indefinite American presence in S.E. Asia... it is time we change the rigidity of our viewpoint. A trial of this theory wouldn't leave us any worse off than we are today. Author Russell Kirk went on to warn that the United States is in the grip of an armed doctrine ideology which has promised future salvation in exchange for adherence to a rigorous doctrine. For the first time we see the possibility of the U.S. adopting an ideology-one which could destroy the pattern of order and freedom. 40 Senator Barry Goldwater, speaking to the question of legalizing marijuana, said: I challenge anyone to explain how we can control the distribution of all kinds of dope if we legalize one of them... but I guess if people can die of smoking tobacco, they can die of smoking marijuana if they want to. Goldwater also explained that when a conservative calls Huntley and Brinkley effete snobs it's because they are. Another symposium speaker was Mayor of San Francisco Joseph Alioto, who forecast that there would be many fights during the '70's largely in the courts, over such things as air, water and resource pollution. And as for smog, the mayor said, The auto industry says give us 15 years and we will solve the air pollution problem. In 15 years they will be signing death certificates with air pollution or smog as the cause of death. Congressman John Tunney (D-Riverside), a declared candidate for democratic nomination to the Senate presently held by Senator George Murphy, argued that, We've got to quit overreacting to every imagined threat in every corner of the world. We've got to learn there are limits to our resources and our commitments. 41 42 Free... Free... Free at last! —A Stanford Dolly Stanford women were busy this year denying the accusation that they were plastic dollies. For weeks an editorial battle raged in the Daily as to whether or not the Stanford woman was a smiling citadel of phoniness. The battle was short-lived as the Daily declared perpetual moratorium on the argument. The girls won 2 to 1. The dollies and the University faced a bigger issue in November: prescription of the Pill to unwed Stanford minors through the auspices of Cowell Health Center. In January, President Pitzer approved the proposal that allows Cowell to dispense with control pills to all co-eds. The new policy went into effect immediately. President Pitzer's approval culminated an eighteen month study into the legal and medical aspects of such a proposal. This year has seen the growth of a Woman's Liberation Movement on campus. The first task they undertook was creating a child day-care center in Stanford's old Elementary School. Generally speaking, Stanford women may always be called the dollies but the continued integration of the sexes has been significant in lending some genuineness to the plastic image. 43 So keep the faith... The Frosh built the bonfire The Frosh guarded the bonfire The Band told dirty stories and pulled RF's Oski sang the National Anthem The Band played the National Anthem for Oski The Frats decorated their lawns The Frats had parties that no one would ever forget The Zetes invited everyone to the Lag-Seca Classic Chi Psi ate pie Everyone cheers Business as Usual 44 ...but I still think the draft stinks. It's a barbaric misguided attempt at peace. No. 366 Some called it Washington Roulette. Some cried; some were relieved; all listened intently as the results of the Draft Lottery came across the radio. The newly-revised conscription system affected men between 19 and 26. At 5 p.m. those born on September 14 found out that they would be the first to go as soon as their deferments ran out. At 6:37 p.m. those born on June 8 found out they were No. 366. Those that had drawn above 230 had probably lost and would not be drafted—that is, if their particular state was not one of the states that would draft nearly all eligible draftees no matter what their number. 45 This afternoon's events at Stanford are truly deplorable. No matter what our differences, in a university we must not descend to the level of mere brawling to settle them. —Provost Lyman Separate protests against General Electric and Zionism organized by Students for a Democratic Society and the Arab students at Stanford were linked when about 30 G.E. demonstrators chased about a dozen members of the conservative Free Campus Movement into Tresidder, where they tried unsuccessfully to steal F.C.M. pictures of peaceful picketing outside the Placement Office. During the brawl a false fire alarm was sounded thus delaying the start of a talk in the Main Lounge by Israeli Ambassador Yitzhak Rabion. The talk was interrupted by about 20 pro-Arab demonstrators chanting outside the door and rapping their knuckles on the large glass windows of the Lounge. Back downstairs, the FCM students had found a flying wedge to protect the film. Feelings against FCM have run high among radical students since films taken and identified were used in connection with more than 100 arrests after last May's demonstrations at SRI. The film was saved. Charges were filed by FCM. The Israeli Ambassador finished his talk and departed while police protected his retreat. PLACEMENT SERVICE 46 47 With this I.R.S. ruling the Administration decided someone was going to get screwed, and it turned out to be us. — English T.A. The American Federation of Teachers, an organization which is not recognized by the University as a bargaining agent, picketed President Kenneth Pitzer's office on January 23 to publicize their demands for readjusted T.A. salaries. The members of Local 1816 picketed to protest the decreased net salary of Stanford teaching assistants and the lack of a formal method of presenting grievances to the University administration. The T.A.'s demanded that new minimum salary guidelines be instituted to allow for the court ruling that eliminated their tax-exempt status. This court ruling reduced a T.A.'s take-home pay to $300-$350 below salary levels established in spring 1969. When salary levels for the T.A.'s were established last spring, it was understood that they would not be paying income tax because their salaries were considered by the Internal Revenue Service as fellowship stipends, which are tax-exempt under IRS regulations Section 117. The new court ruling affected a total of 280 T.A.'s. Hardest hit by the tax decision were the English T.A.'s, because the English Department was not able to make good the tax loss. The T.A.'s argued that by receiving less money from the University than contracted for constituted an effective breach of contract. The English T.A.'s threatened to strike but then tabled the proposal to stop work pending proposals from the English Department. The Administration is studying federal income tax laws in an effort to discover possible ways of avoiding the tax liabilities. Dean of Graduate Studies Lincoln E. Moses commented that no policy of reimbursing teaching assistants for their federal income taxes is contemplated. 48 “At BYU, unlike so many schools, happily campus life does not embrace chainwalking to far left bigotry, homage to alien ideologies, disrespect for the American flag, arrogant, traitorous flaunting of enemy flags, championing of drug use, dedication to debauchery, and physical violence threatened or in fact—whether it be hoodlumism (such as raiding a trustees' meeting) or murder. —Dudley Swim, former President of the Alumni Association President Pitzer announced in November that Stanford will not schedule future athletic competition with institutions sponsored by the Mormon Church. The ruling did not affect Stanford's contractual agreement to two basketball games with Brigham Young University in December, although attempts were made to cancel the two games. President Pitzer's actions implemented the recommendation of the faculty-student Human Relation Commission which was asked in January 1969 to examine University scheduling policy. The Commission recommended that the University not “schedule events with institutions which practice discrimination on the basis of race or national origin, or which are affiliated with or sponsored by institutions which do so. The announcement of the Stanford position brought widely varied responses. Many were critical of the University's stand. Those who attacked President Pitzer's decision charged that the University had been placed in a “hypocritical position by banning relations with BYU without taking a similar stand with regard to other institutions that similarly practice discrimination. Pitzer's critics offered USC as an example. USC is sponsored by the Methodist Church which maintains a segregated denomination, the African Methodist Episcopalian Church. President Pitzer, responding to the charges, claimed he could see no similarity with the BYU situation in that what the Methodist Church did in certain areas did not affect the USC campus. The President was unable then to suggest any ways in which the Morman policy affected the BYU campus, but rather said he would stand on his previous statements. One attorney in Salt Lake City pointed out that it was pointless to discriminate against Brigham Young University since its students and faculty can't change the theology of the Mormon Church, which does not allow blacks to become priests and thus denies blacks entrance into the highest of the Mormon's three heavens. Despite the wealth of criticism. President Pitzer described the balance of mail coming to his office as favorable and Provost Richard W. Lyman predicted that the newly initiated policy is not likely to change as long as the black students felt that racial discrimination is present in the practices of the church and therefore in institutions which are sponsored by it. 49 I suppose we're just members of the Establishment. —manager of Wells Fargo Bank damaged during Huey P. Newton Birthday March What started as a torchlight parade following the Huey P. Newton Birthday Rally in Memorial Auditorium ended in twenty shattered windows and one arrest. The march, slated as a protest against the contempt sentencing in the Chicago 7 Conspiracy trial, involved 350 to 500 people at its height. By the time the crowd moved back to campus, it numbered about 150. Windows were shattered by rocks hurled from El Camino, where the protesters had thronged, holding up traffic. Dean Witter Co., a stock brokerage firm, was first damaged. Next, Wells Fargo Bank was pelted and then the Bank of America building, which houses the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Protesters shouted, Get the third floor, the location of the F.B.I. The demonstrators attempted to surround the Bank of America building but turned back toward campus as two police cars approached from the rear of the building with lights flashing. Windows were broken in savings and loan associations and the Stanford Ski Shop located on the route back to campus. At least three in the new Hoover Library were also smashed as a final gesture of the destructive march before the dwindling crowd disbanded. About twenty-five Palo Alto police were standing by during the latter stages of the activities but when asked if they would try to block the crowd, one officer replied, No, just as long as they go back to Stanford. Palo Alto businessmen and Stanford officials reacted calmly to the vandalism revolution on El Camino. By mid-afternoon, most of the broken windows had been replaced and things returned to business as usual. The night before, while the protestors had been yelling Free Huey, Off the Pigs, a police officer, Brian McDowell, had been blown up by a bomb which had partially destroyed a San Francisco police station. 50 “Reverse the unfair Middle East Policy of your government ... —petition signed by 500 members of the Stanford community One hundred and fifty heavily-armed police officers and deputy sheriffs kept a close guard over the French President, Georges Pompidou, when he came to visit Stanford's Linear Accelerator (SLAC) and to meet with student and administrative leaders during a ninety minute stay. Between 350 and 400 protesters showed up to greet the French President and his Foreign Minister, Maurice Schumann. Most of the protesters supported the Israeli position in the Middle East, but about twenty-five members of the SDS Worker-Student Alliance were also present to show support for “Arab masses in their struggle against Israel and the reactionary Arab regimes. Their shouts of Long Live Al Fatah! were virtually drowned out by the pro-Israeli demonstrators. Mr. Pompidou, followed en masse by his entourage of security police, spent about 40 minutes touring the SLAC complex. He was accompanied on the tour by SLAC Director Commissioner Theos J. Thompson, and MIT Professor Victor Weisskopf, former head of the European Center for Nuclear Research. Provost Richard Lyman conversed with Pompidou in French to give the French President a general idea of campus operation, trustee relations and some fiscal considerations. Mr. Pompidou never really came in direct contact with the demonstrators. He seemed to ignore the picketers' signs which were clearly visible from the helicopter landing zone. The protesters carried signs, including Peace is not a Mirage, French Honor for Sale, Send Pompidou to Libya and Dreyfus II. Many of the pro-Israeli demon-straters appeared to be middle aged or older. The French President left by helicopter for San Francisco. Everywhere Pompidou went on his American trip he was greeted by pro-Israeli demonstraters protesting French policy in the Middle East. President Nixon issued a formal apology to Mr. Pompidou for the demonstrations he had encountered. 51 52 'To our knowledge, the ROTC contracts are the only university-sponsored and sanctioned contracts on the undergraduate level that bind a student to service. —the editors of CHAPARRAL in their February 16th issue on ROTC On January 20th President Pitzer, acting on Colonel Ramey's October 22nd proposal, asked that limited academic credit be allowed to the Army Reserve Officer's Training Corps (ROTC). He asked that Army ROTC courses be reviewed in accordance with normal University procedures and granted appropriate academic credit for those courses that met University requirements. The Pitzer recommendation also suggested the abolishment of departmental status for ROTC and recommended a Center for Military Studies as its replacement. In addition it recommended changing the title of the Professor of Military Science to Director of Military Studies with all faculty privileges except that of membership in the Academic Council. The request was sent to the Faculty Senate. President Pitzer's request came nearly one year after the Faculty Senate, acting on the recommendation of the faculty-student Committee on ROTC, had voted to deny credit to ROTC courses after a general phase-out to be completed in 1973. The President's Advisory Committee on ROTC affairs was appointed last spring to work out details for the revision or termination of the contracts between Stanford and the armed forces. On March 11, 1969 the Board of Trustees differed with the faculty ruling and urged the President of the University to continue his consultation with the Department of Defense, leading to appropriate actions which will improve and vitalize this important program. But on April 30, 1969 a mail balloting of the Academic Council approved the Senate's 1969 ROTC decision. On October 22, 1970 the proposal for revision of the Army ROTC was submitted by Colonel Ramey, Army ROTC Commander. His proposal was forwarded to the Advisory Committee on ROTC. The recommendations of the Advisory Committee were submitted to the Steering Committee of the Senate on January 16. On January 22, after lengthy debate, the Faculty Senate voted 23 to 13 to approve on a one-year basis the Army proposal endorsed by the Advisory Commission on ROTC. On February 12, Professor Harold Kahn submitted a petition signed by more than the required 50 members of the Academic Council, asking for a special meeting of that group to review the Academic Senate decision on ROTC. On March 2, the requested special meeting of the Academic Council was held in Dinkelspiel. Faculty speakers rose to give various opinions on the ROTC question. A mail balloting was decided upon to determine faculty opinion. Outside the Academic Council meeting, the New Moratorium Committee had prepared a revolutionary welcome for the faculty members. They had erected in front of Dinkelspiel a facade of the Bank of America building. As the faculty members walked through the doorways of the Bank, New Moratorium members handed out issues of the February 16 ROTC issue of CHAPARRAL. Throughout the year, radicals demonstrated against ROTC's presence on campus. Attempting everything from disruption of classes, to commando attacks to disturb ROTC maneuvers in the foothills, the New Moratorium pressed for the expulsion of ROTC from campus. Department of Defense pressure increased the Administration's desire to come to a compromise that would allow ROTC and its Naval and Air Force counterparts to remain on the Stanford campus when the dust of the present ROTC controversy settles. Minimum academic credit is considered essential to the continuation of the armed forces program on campus. 53 The point of SUN is to educate students into the financial structure of Stanford and to get them into the habit of giving money. Stanford has the cheapest alumni for an elite university in the country... SUN is an attempt at scaring the alumni into giving money. —Barry Askinas ASSU Council of Presidents On October 30, President Pitzer asked the Academic Senate to nominate faculty members for a faculty-student committee to serve with university officers in planning a major fund-raising campaign. The result of the committee's work was the Stanford University Now (SUN) fund-raising program. In the second week of February, a letter signed by SUN's student chairman Chris Rafferty was mailed to all Stanford students. The letter stated that Stanford students could play a leading role in positive solutions to Stanford's current financial crisis. Included with the letter was a brochure that highlighted the three funds to which a student might contribute. The Martin Luther King Jr. Fund was organized to provide financial aid to students from ethnic minority groups. The Innovation Fund would be made available for student-initiated programs such as the recently approved Student Center for Innovation and Research for Education. A student could also contribute to the General University Fund which is used to add books to the library, pay professor salaries, and to support costs of doing research not sponsored by the federal government. It is a public nuisance for any person to maintain any clubroom in which any alcoholic beverage is received or kept, or to which any alcoholic beverage is brought for consumption on the premises... unless the persons or premises are licensed. —The Alcoholic Beverage Commission The Stanford Faculty Club, a traditional bastion for faculty relaxation and occasional cocktail parties, was declared DRY as a result of an Alcoholic Beverages Commission order that prohibits the keeping or serving of alcoholic beverages without a license. The closing of the liquor lockers was hoped to be temporary. The club applied for a license and prepared to wait out the dry spell. A sign appeared on the entrance to the club for a thirty-day period explaining that liquor had been banned from the premises pending reception of the necessary license. Legitimate business at the club continued to flourish, and the demand for Coca-Cola and iced tea was reported to be on the increase. 55 56 Man is only running out of food, he is also destroying the life support systems of spaceship earth... It is the top of the ninth inning. Man, always a threat at the plate, has been hitting nature hard. It is important to remember, however, that NATURE BATS LAST. —Dr. Paul Ehrlich About 800 students packed Dinkelspiel Auditorium to hear Dr. Paul Ehrlich sum up his hopes and fears for man's future. The occasion was the last lecture of the extremely popular on population biology. The usually pessimistic Ehrlich did not paint his usual picture of environmental doom and population squeeze but instead voiced his hope that the people present would spread the information they had learned in the course to their friends. He urged everyone to work for the enivornmental teach-in to be held in April and to begin to assert political pressure to bring passage of urgent environment bills in Congress. He restated the various pressing pollution and population problems faced by mankind and walking off the stage to a standing ovation he calmly wished everyone good luck. 57 The new vice-presidency reflects the particular importance that attaches to research policy under present circumstances and also will be helpful in making apparent to federal agencies the significance to the University of this officer's responsibilities. —President Pitzer Associate Provost William F. Miller was named Stanford's first Vice President for Research. In his new position, Mr. Miller will have primary responsibility for university policies regarding sponsored research and share responsibilities for the research component of graduate study. He will also oversee the Center for Materials Research, the Hansen Laboratories, the Institute of Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences and the Computation Center. Professor Miller has served on the National Academy of Sciences' Computer Science and Engineering Board and the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and was recommended by a faculty research committee headed by Nobel Laureate Joshua Lederberg and approved by the Board of Trustees on January 13. One the same day, the Board of Trustees announced their decision on the separation of Stanford University and Stanford Research Institute. The provisions of separation provided that SRI would continue to function as a nonprofit research organization but would be legally separated from the university. SRI will pay twenty-five million dollars to Stanford over a period of years to cover the cost of its independence. Stanford trustees will relinquish control of the institute and will no longer be general directors of SRI with authority to elect the SRI Board. The severance of SRI from Stanford contradicted student demands of a year ago when a sit-in was staged at the Applied Electronics Laboratory on campus. Many students preferred continued control of SRI as a means of preventing war reseach. Stanford Research Institute was founded by the University in 1946 as a non-profit research organization providing specialized research services under contract to business, industry, foundations and the government. 58 “In the backwash of the ASSU Student Senate's feeble attempt to intimidate this newspaper in its investigation of ASSU financial affairs, ARENA researchers have unearthed new evidence to substantiate the allegations of possible fiscal responsibility. Stanford politicos hopped aboard for another whirl on the campus political merry-go-round. First, THE ARENA felt that Roger Reed, former chairman of the Political Union, was being unjustly persecuted for his error in committing five thousand dollars of ASSU money for a series of speakers (including Barry Goldwater) without authorization from Student Financial Manager David Swift. THE ARENA decided to do some investigating themselves, and subsequently leveled a blast at David Swift, accusing him of financial irresponsibility in handling ASSU accounts. Swift, speaking before the ASSU Senate, demanded that THE ARENA retract their statements which he considered slanderous, and asked the Publications Board to review the status of THE ARENA on campus. He pointed out that it had not been registered as a student publication with the Publications Board and its financial status had not been reported, as required of all publications containing advertising by ASSU by-laws. Next, THE ARENA retaliated by challenging the legitimacy of the Publications Board and its power to compel publications to register with it. Hukari stated his case bluntly: We don't want your authorization to distribute on campus. We don't need it. He suggested that the Publications Board dissolve itself. CHAPARRAL editor Michael Sweeney supported Hukari, stating that freedom of the press prohibited any group from exerting such regulatory power. Pub Board subsequently decided to amend its standing rules and recommended changes in the by-laws of the Constitution. THE ARENA was allowed to remain on campus with free access to the ASSU typesetting shop. The masthead of ARENA'S next issue proclaimed it Stanford's Only Unregulated, Unauthorized Weekly Newspaper, It continued to question the financial state of tne ASSU. Meanwhile the ASSU tried to complete the audit on its books. 59 60 The problems that have originated with land-use policies, specifically in the Mid-Peninsula area, were problems caused in large part by Stanford University. —Judy Strasser Moderator for Grass Roots Forum At the beginning of winter quarter, the Land and Building Development Committee began a re-evaluation of the University's land-use policies. Vice Provost Howard Brooks acknowledged that technically this committee can review any decision made by the planning office. These meetings began at a time when student interest and action in land-use issues was growing. The growing interest was indicated in the formation of the new, ecologically-oriented group. Grass Roots, which organized to actively protest the proposed construction site of the Dillingham office-hotel complex planned for Stanford land. The group maintained that the Dillingham project would aggravate the local housing shortage by building the business complex on land that should be devoted to housing. Stanford's real estate manager Boyd Smith, however, commented that although many of the Grass Roots members were very sincere, they had deliberately twisted some of the facts. President Pitzer stated that the land allocated for the Dillingham project was not suitable for low-cost housing. Nevertheless, support for the land-use issue increased, and more than 180 people from Stanford and the Palo Alto community gathered at the Dillingham site on January 12 in protest. A tent was erected at the Dillingham rally to symbolize low-cost housing, a need which Grass Roots felt industry and the university were ignoring. Coyote Hill was another controversial area of land development. An animal research facility is planned for this area, but high construction bids have slowed progress. A lawsuit was filed by the Committee for Green Foothills to prevent construction on the grounds that construction was destroying a public good. However the lawsuit has had little effect on the progress of the project. President Pitzer stated that while future plans for the use of Stanford's land were being reviewed, the current projects near Page Mill Road (the Dillingham project) and on Coyote Hill could not be halted. He stated that for Stanford now to cancel all these agreements unilaterally would expose the university to serious legal action and undermine confidence in the institution. President Pitzer completed his summary of the Stanford land use situation by saying that in its present financial straits, the University can not afford to pay taxes on idle land and forego the income it would produce if developed. Meanwhile, Grass Roots published The Promised Land, its version of the Stanford land-use situation. 61 62 [ELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ESCONDIDO VIILAGE INCREMENT N04 1010 •� -2000000 IOAH COLLEGE HOUSING PROGRAM hojcct no CM Aur-207 o US KJM01KNT Of HOUSJ� C t UUM KVUOfWEKT MCf-UT K WONG (r- HUM lx MMO) c KOCOM i cmui ccwtiactc MSOCAHS - MCXtlKT 00 HUM III , jpioou iMuratocw iiiwont cau UGLY's name may tell to much... but it does have the arches, and the sandstone and red tile, so I guess it's one of the family. —Design Professor Matt Kahn Several new structures were completed during the 1969-1970 year. These included the new Central Food Service building, the Food Research Institute wing in Encina Hall, and the Ruth Wattis Mitchell Earth Sciences Building. Manzanita Park was erected as a short term solution to Stanford's undergraduate housing problem. Construction continued on the Escondido Four project that will add graduate housing. Jordan Hall, formerly housing the Biology Department, underwent renovation for occupation by the Psychology Department in 1970. Stanford, in all its building projects, has tried to maintain the common architectural theme of the original Quad. The remodeling of Jordan Hall will increase the usefulness of this historic structure without changing its exterior. Stanford still remains the land of sandstone and red tile. 63 Stanford's Drama Department will continue to produce plays as part of its training program, although production will be on a reduced scale and must be self-supporting. —Michael Barry Chairman of Drama Department The Stanford Repertory Theater (SRT) announced this year that it would have to disband in May at the close of the 1969-70 season. SRT officials explained that the acute financial crisis of the University made it impossible to carry the deficit of the large-scale production organization. The repertory theater began in 1965 with a three-year grant of $300,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation to support a professional company of ten actors and two acting fellows. Box office receipts were expected to cover technical and administrative salaries as well as the cost of each production. SRT immediately created a financial deficit. Lack of a good theater facility contributed to SRT's plight. The largest theater, 1700-seat Memorial Auditorium, was an extremely expensive place to produce, while the 197-seat theater below it could not bring in enough income to cover its production costs. In the 1968-69 season SRT became a non-professional company employing as guest artists one professional actress, Maidie Norman, to perform and teach, and one professional director, Michael Barry. Barry became chairman of the Speech and Drama Department in mid-season 1968-69. Special grants from the Trustees and the School of Humanities and Sciences supported the growing operating deficit. These funds are no longer available. Following the spring world premiere of David Pinner's Drums of Snow and the production of Shakespeare's The Winter Tale, the Stanford Repertory Theater curtain will fall for the last time. 64 If you claim to believe the Vietnam War is immoral—if you understand why the burning of a village and the slaughter of civilians is an abhorrent act—then your job is not to open up a new frontier for bloodshed but to stop it everywhere once and for all. —Mayor John Lindsay On March 31, the crowd jammed Dinkelspiel to hear Tom Hayden, one of the defendants in the Chicago 7 Conspiracy Trial, rap against the oppression of the court system that had sentenced him to five years for inciting to riot and 16 months for contempt of court. Hayden told the overflow crowd that the Chicago 7 Trial was an act of vengeance by a doomed dinosaur class against the politics, music, and social attitude of the younger generation. Hayden maintained that the jury had considered five of the seven innocent but had capitulated to pressure from police and the rest of society. The hours following Tom Hayden's talk were full of the vibrating sound of shattering glass. Two days later. Mayor of New York John Lindsay came to speak in Mem Chu against the evils of violence and repression. He pointed to Vietnam as an example of the violence he hoped to eliminate. Lindsay noted that violence and terror wreak havoc among innocents, whether they are peasants in a Vietnam village or workers in an office building. Lindsay went on to say that repression was just as dangerous for the nation as violence. Listing attempts by the federal government to curtail freedoms, he said that all we hear is violent despair and appeals to fear. Mayor Lindsay commented on the military commitment to S.E. Asia, saying the Vietnam War is being fought in pursuit of false premises and must be stopped. He concluded his remarks to the crowd of 2300 by declaring that the nation was in a delicate period of balance. He urged that violence end before repression robs America of her rightful liberties. He finished by saying We cannot heal society by stifling the cries of the patient. On April 14 Yippie leader Jerry Rubin introduced himself as Johnny Cash visiting Stanford Penitentiary. He attacked schools and universities, the court system, ROTC and the repression of youth by society. He stated that the war is not just in Asia or in the ghettos; it's on the campuses. School imposes guilt... we can only succeed by breaking it down. If we close the universities we deliver a body blow to society. The crowd of 1400 was sympathetic to Rubin's attacks on the schools and the courts, but a strained, uneasy quiet fell over the people when the stoned Rubin delivered a fundamental tenet of the Yippie credo. Kill your parents. They are dictators over us. They're trying to get us to lead the same miserable lives they do. Rubin finished his words by urging everyone to take action. He proclaimed There are only two important words in my book, DO IT. Some students went over and milled around the ROTC building. Others just went to dinner. 65 lOSflURS ARE?XWCr ?' Obsolete--------„ --------------1 UfcAREEXT?H DUJO URS ARE EXTWCl THE CONFUSED WORLD! IVO URS ARE fcX'mv- Ml ISfUCKf 66 Men are being prepared at Stanford to kill Vietnamese and other citizens of the Third World for the ultimate profit of big corporations. Any sane person would agree that if all the windows at Stanford could be traded for the life of one Vietnamese or one American, it would be a bargain. —Diamond McGuire Spring Quarter, historically the season for student activism at Stanford, began to the shattering sound of breaking glass and the squawking static of police megaphones. The Anti-ROTC Movement had chosen to begin its life with a violent show of frustration. The action began on the night of March 31 in response to the slim faculty approval of a plan to permit Army ROTC courses to qualify for limited academic credit for a one-year trial basis. This approval was the reverse of the faculty decision the year before to deny credit for ROTC. The early actions of the Anti-ROTC Movement were dictated by the logic that you can't have ROTC without a ROTC building. A group of about 200 moved from a rally in Dinkelspiel down to the ROTC building where they broke some windows. Police were on the scene immediately to scatter the mob who ran in all directions into the night. The demonstrators then moved across campus smashing windows in the Graduate School of Business, the History corner, the President's office, the Lou Henry Hoover Building, the Aeronautics and Astronautics Building and the Placement Office. The next day, April 1, President Pitzer warned that Stanford would do everything possible within the boundaries appropriate to an academic community, to protect (itself) from personal injury and property destruction. That night red water-soluble paint was dumped on the shoulders and back of President Pitzer by an unidentified masked and robed assailant. Pitzer was dumped on while he was having an after-dinner conversation with students at Grove House. The assailant dropped a sign reading April Fool, and escaped. 67 During the rest of the week, the marches and rock-throwing continued. In one night, four arrests were made for felonious assault with a deadly weapon. During the day innumerable ROTC classes were disrupted by auditors who forced Provost Lyman to close ROTC enrollment as an emergency measure because of the disruption of ROTC activities. On Friday, April 3, the first Anniversary of A3M, the Academic Council's spring quarter meeting was disrupted by the entrance of 140 demonstrators demanding the Council discuss the ROTC issue. President Pitzer read off the injunction against disruption. They sang We Shall Overcome and left. The two weeks of rock throwing was accomplished by a definite minority of the student body whose ranks were swelled by high school and non-students. The Adminsitration responded by ordering five well-known members of the Anti-ROTC Movement to show cause why they should not be held in contempt of court in connection with the demonstrations that disrupted ROTC activities and a meeting of the Academic Council. Later, five hundred students gathered in Mem Chu following a silent march from White Plaza to protest and discuss the recent violence on campus. The student referendum with 59% of the student body voting saw a definite majority of the students vote for no credit for ROTC. As the book went to press, a sit-in at the Old Union by ROTC protestors ended in the arrest of 23 person, followed by continued window smashing and a $100,000 fire at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences. 68 69 Unless you and I are willing to get personally and heavily involved into the problem of how, then we're really not very serious about what has been so easy to proclaim. —Assemblyman John Vasconcellos Eight thousand people gathered in the dawn-light of Frost Amphitheater to celebrate a Dawning of Peace. Many people had spent the night at Frost singing folk songs or just trying to get some sleep. The night was cold and at dawn people began filing in quietly. A balloonist rode his brightly-colored balloon up above the stage, a sign reading The Dawn of Peace hung from the basket. Everyone warmed to the songs that the cast of HAIR had come to share. As the sun hit the stage, the last words of Let the Sunshine In echoed away into the air leaving the crowd on its feet and the cast of HAIR dancing off the stage. The crowd applauded their performance. Some yelled RIGHT ON! Some just stared out from tired eyes and enjoyed the morning that had seen 8000 people gather in a celebration joy and life to voice their disgust for the violent presence of American forces in Southeast Asia. The speakers returned to their politics and the Festival of Life became a free rock concert. Many stayed to listen to the good sounds and soak up the warm sunshine. Others went to the polling places and decided for themselves what to do about ROTC and student government. Some announced they would go hungry until the referendum vote on the ROTC issue was decided. The students from Paly went back to high school. At Berkeley, tear gas exploded and students confronted the police. Governor Ronald Reagan was talking about a blood bath. The joyful Dawning of Peace was followed by a rather ordinary day. 70 71 Come one. Come all! Everyone can play. Exploit the world's resources. You can own the world. Come play RESOURCE MONOPOLY. -Worker at the Environmental Fair Hundreds gathered in White Plaza on National Earth Day to take in Stanford's Environmental Fair. One visitor, noting beakers of dirty, polluted Bay water displayed on a demonstration table, commented that he was glad we had treatment plants to clean up the polluted water. The man behind the demonstration table replied, This is treated water. Some folk-singers sang This Land is Your Land. People passed out literature. Professor Bruce Franklin urged everyone to go down to Corning-Owens plant to support the workers fight for a safer working environment. Eddie Albert asked everyone to turn themselves inside out and reconsider their priorities. Then he entertained the question why his show Green Acres was sponsored by one of the U.S.A.'s largest phosphate polluters, Procter and Gamble. Mr. Albert rationalized that everyone is a victim and criminal in the ecological crisis. Most did not agree. Stephanie Mills, speaking after Albert, said that the ecological crisis was inextricably entwined with the economic-social value system of this country. She exclaimed, We are striving to put joy back on the face of the earth. The environment was full of questions and ideas. Paul Ehrlich, speaking at Bowling Green, concluded his remarks by saying, the battle to save our planet is not just a battle for population control and environmental sanity. It is also a battle against exploitation, against war, and against racism. That is, it is a battle for equity, peace and justice without which the world would hardly by worth saving. 72 74 75 ROTC: OPPOSITION by Michael Sweeney Michael Sweeney is a senior in psychology. He is a member of the New Moratorium, editor of CHAPARRAL, and a former DAILY editor. ROTC is a latecomer to the political arena at Stanford. Dozens of other universities have already been engaged in bitter struggles against the military's presence on campus. The Harvard sit-in and strike of Spring 1969 were a national sensation. Little controversy had previously arisen at Stanford because of an early faculty decision to deny academic credit to ROTC and deny other privileges. A resounding Faculty Senate vote of 25-8 in February 1969 has made it unlikely that ROTC would remain at Stanford. But a surprise was in store for the Stanford community. Under pressure from the Board of Trustees and the Defense Department, President Pitzer announced in January 1970 that he wanted ROTC continued with a few minor changes, including academic credit for individual courses which passed a faculty review. Campus radicals are beginning to organize in opposition to ROTC. We approach the issue with an understanding that has been widened by years of anti-imperialist activity across the nation. ROTC is not seen as an issue of the appropriateness of military training at the university. Instead, the military is attacked on the basis of its worldwide activities of genocide and oppression. Stanford's sponsorship of ROTC is direct support for the Vietnam War, and we see no end to that war unless the American people withdraw their support from the instruments of oppression. Two arguments are advanced to defend ROTC. The first is the old cliche about the importance of the “civilian influence on the military, which ROTC is supposed to preserve. We assert that ROTC is more accurately seen as a way to militarize civilians into a hierarchy that gives them no freedom to dissent or violate orders. The hierarchy is rigidly controlled by the professional career officers, while at the very top, civilians in the government make the policies that the military executed. Another argument common to the defense of ROTC is that Stanford students should have the right to join ROTC if they so chose. We can only reply that Stanford University is under no obligation to provide an optional program to train officers; if a student is determined to pursue that career, he can go elsewhere. We deny that collaboration with the U.S. military is defensible as a freedom for anyone while the Vietnam War continues. Whatever the outcome of the ROTC controversy at Stanford, it will help make one idea clear to the community: a university is no sanctuary from the struggle against imperialism. It takes the side of the oppressors, or the side of the oppressed. 76 ROTC: SUPPORT by Steve Webb Steve Webb is a senior in psychology and is a participant in the Naval ROTC Program on campus. He is also a former editor of the QUAD. ROTC, it seems, has become the scapegoat for the wrath of many students opposed to the war in Vietnam, and to the direction in which our country is moving. But as a scapegoat, ROTC is an unfortunate choice. Why? First, the wrath is being misplaced. There is a tendency among students to forget that the military does not make the policy of the United States; it is merely a group sworn to obey all lawful orders. Dissatisfaction ought to be directed at the legislators and policymakers in the government, not at those who must defend it. Those in the military are in the peculiar position of having to defend the policies of one administration on one day, and perhaps a completely new policy when a new President is elected. Second, if anything is going to help fuse some of the differences—and increase the understanding-between military and civilian factions of our society, it will be a program like ROTC. In the other principal officer-training programs, OCS and the academies, the student steps completely out of a civilian role and completely into a military role. There is no day to day comparison of roles, there are no criticisms, no challenges. ROTC, though, affords this comparison and, in supplying well-rounded officers from broad sources, is better able to prevent any formulation of a military caste of military minds. What, then, is ROTC? It is simply an alternative—an alternative for those of us faced with a military obligation who choose to undergo officer training during college instead of taking chances with the draft. It is a rather attractive alternative in that both scholarships and retainer pay are available to many of the students in the program. But dropping all academic credit for ROTC and keeping the course work the same would surely hurt participation in the program, since keeping a full course load in addition to ROTC courses would be a strain on students. A working solution, I believe, would be to allow credit to ROTC courses on their academic merits, as in the Army proposal passed by the Academic Senate in February. This limited credit could be coupled with a smaller amount of non-credit professional training during school, plus summer training. Yet the credit issue seems to be secondary to a more basic pressure just to push ROTC out of Stanford. This is pressure that won't end the war, pressure that won't soothe student frustrations, but pressure that will just reduce by one an individual's alternatives, and widen the gap of misunderstanding between civilians and the military. 77 78 THE SALARIES: A NON-ISSUE by Mark Weinberger Mark Weinberger is a senior Political Science major. He is a former Daily Editor. Fall quarter is a rather unassuming quarter. Student flow onto campus and begin the long drift to Christmas. Beards begin to sprout, and short summer hair turns shaggy. A few beach days remain, but most students make fall quarter their heaviest academic quarter. Fresh ideas are spawned, organizations compete for members, and projects are begun in a flush of enthusiasm. To many, fall quarter still means Saturday afternoon at the brown pie shell soaking up football and sunshine. The easy life. Fall quarter is a tough nut to crack. It's impossible to draw more than 100 people to a demonstration, no matter what the cause. The only ripple on this year's tranquil sea was a physical tussle between a squad of high school crazies and a gaggle of right-wing loonies. For the most part, the most lively spot on campus was the undergraduate library. During fall quarter, faculty try to make progress on that unfinished research project, administrators work on next year's budget, and radicals diligently do their own research, laying the groundwork for the traditional spring offensive. There is very little interest by anyone in the present; everyone is looking in another direction. This disinterest accounts for the fact that THE ISSUE fall quarter was a flop. No one really cared to make it into an issue. The non-bombshell for the quarter came on October 27 as 50 copies of a thick sheaf of papers were stealthily distributed around the campus. The document contained the 1968-69 salary figures for most Stanford professors and administrators, a hitherto tightly-guarded state secret. There was little doubt that the data was swiped from files by student sitting-in at Encina Hall during the spring of 1968. The publication of the fact that the documents had been distributed on campus touched off the non-furor that constituted The Issue of fall quarter, 1969. It wasn't that the salary sheets weren't interesting. Hundreds of students (and dozens of faculty under the cover of darkness) took enough interest to flock to THE DAILY office to peruse a copy of the salary list tacked to a wall. The sheets confirmed a number of long-standing suspicions about the distribution of resources around the University. For one, administrators aren't starving; deans and others within academic officialdom are consistently hitting the $30,000 per year mark, headed by the President's $60,000 salary. Second, those in the sciences, and particularly Medicine, outdraw by substantial amounts the salaries earned by those in the Humanities and Social Sciences. In 79 addition, those wooed from other institutions to settle in Stanford's fair pastures command far healtheir stipends than equally noteworthy professors who have had the misfortune of being home-grown resources. Third, and most disturbing, were the cases of intra-departmental discrimination against those who have gained their reputations by teaching rather than research expertise. The primary, but not the only, example was the Political Science Department, whose chairman, in a confidential salary recommendation in 1967, uniformly praised fellow research behavioralists, but mostly panned those who concentrate efforts on teaching undergraduates. The intra-departmental discrepancies in salary are glaring for this and other departments, with non-researchers drawing pay-checks that would embarrass a plumber. Despite all these juicy facts. THE ISSUE generated an impressive non-response. The best that the administration could muster were a series of saber-rattlings that warned of doom to any publication that would dare to reveal the salaries of individual professors. They also threw crumbs at those calling for less secrecy in salary breakdowns by school only. Radicals also made few efforts at turning fall quater into something worth remembering. A few professors voluntarily made public the size of their paycheck. And the CHAPARRAL made rather pointed remarks about secrecy in tenure and promotion, chronicled discrepancies within departments, and outlined a view of the exploitive nature of the University hierarchy. With that, attention turned to the Vietnam Moratorium and Big Game. It was a classic case of non-issue. The charge is levelled and the evidence revealed, student indignation rises slightly, the administration reacts with a scolding lecture, a token concession is sometimes made, and it all fades into obscurity. It is fair to say that since the non-controversy this fall efforts have been made to increase formal student evaluation of teaching, several departments have opened their promotion committees to graduate student participation, and the most obnoxious differentials in intra-departmental salary levels have been ameliorated somewhat for next year's payroll. At the same time, secrecy and arbitrary judgement continue, with salary and promotion power held tightly in the hands of senior faculty and deans. Honesty and openness, which sou Id be the cornerstone of academic organization, remain a lofty goal that may remain forever hidden. It was a normal, less than exciting, fall quarter. But there was some consolation. After all, we won the Big Game. 80 81 38 OVERSEAS: OPPORTUNITY by Mike Armstrong Mike Armstrong is a senior majoring in italian. He spent six months at Stanford-in-Italy and will be returning in June as Assistant to the Directors at the Italy campus. He is also a member of the Overseas Campuses Board. My most formative and enjoyable six months as a Stanford student were spent in Florence, Italy. As a member of Italy XVI I was able to live in a foreign country, meet Italians from many walks of life, learn to speak the language quite well, and become exposed to traditions, customs, cultures and values quite different from those that we know as Americans. Under the auspices of the Stanford Overseas Campuses Program I had the opportunity to completely change my perspectives and insights with regard to Europe, and certainly with regard to the United States upon my return. Those six months will stay with me forever, with no regrets. I believe that my case is not unique. The Stanford Overseas Campuses Program offers a chance to live in Europe while pursuing a full-time study program. With over 55% of the Stanford undergraduate student body attending one of the five European campuses for half a year, we have the most far-reaching program of its kind in existence today. Many criticisms have been leveled at the present program, but there have been none which outweigh the many merits on which the present program can stand. Each overseas group has the chance to live, eat, work and travel with three Stanford professors; one who stays six months, the other two who reside for three months apiece. These professors attempt to gear their courses to the overseas situation; some, admittedly, with less success than others, but many arouse the interest of even the initially indifferent student. The Overseas Program also offers a very efficient way for many students to satisfy the General Studies requirements. Thus, the fact that an undergraduate can combine a full-time academic load with travel in Europe is perhaps the paramount attraction of the program. These opportunities for travel are staggering. Besides the three-week break between quarters during which each student is free to travel on his own, and besides the normal four-day school week, the Overseas Office organizes two field trips, one each quarter, for each group. These trips are required of all students, and there are usually 3-6 free days at the end of each trip when each student is again free to travel. These field trips are far from financially exhorbitant, a fact to which any returning alumnus will attest. In fact, the finances for the six-month stay are one of the most attractive aspects of the program. Stanford pays everyone's flight to Europe, and tuition, room and board are the same as on the home campus. About $75 is the usual fee for the two field trips—an incredible value for two weeks of room, board and organized tourism. Every student is responsible for his own travel expenses while in Europe, and for his transportation back to the United States. Stanford usually tries to organize a charter flight back to the U.S. for approximately $175, Paris to San Francisco. Numerous other benefits of the program are evident, and perhaps a listing of them here will be useful. One is, undoubtedly, the chance to meet and live with 80 other Stanford students; and while no one dares to make a case for 100% harmony, the opportunity still exists to get to know each and every one of those 80 people. There is ample opportunity for any interested alumnus of a Stanford Overseas Campus to make known his opinions upon his return by joining the Stanford Overseas Campus Board, the student-run organization which, as of this year, is solely responsible for the orientation of each Europe-bound group. Frequently, it is precisely the newly-returned student who can provide the most useful facts and ideas as to how his six months could have been a better experience, and he, therefore, can greatly aid a group about to depart with his suggestions. Perhaps the most difficult part of the overseas adventure to define is that referred to by many as simply the people I met. Time and time again, these include people from varied social and economic backgrounds. People from maids and bartenders and gate-keepers to teachers and Directors of Administration and heads of State. All take time to get to know; all are valuable. If I were to describe the Stanford Overseas Campuses Program in one word, that word would be opportunity. I have to admit that a certain amount, sometimes a great deal, of student initiative is needed, but that in no way detracts from the countless opportunities offered by the program itself. The six months is a definite challenge; but, take that challenge, and you will thank yourself many times over upon your return. 83 OVERSEAS MISMANAGEMENT by Jim Perloff James Perloff is a junior history major. He is the managing editor of the DAILY and attended the Stanford campus in Britain last year. The Overseas Campus program is as fine an example of a paradox that any English teacher could want. On one hand it gives nearly 60 per cent of the undergraduates a chance to study overseas, and most of them come back saying that it was one of the high points of their student careers. On the other hand, it is a perfect example of dictatorial direction, occasional gross mismanagement, and total disregard of student rights. The pivot of the paradox is Robert Walker, director of the Overseas Campus program. He is the administrator responsible for making the overseas program as significant as it is. He is also a dictator whose arbitrary decisions and tastes seriously degrade the program, whose expensive travel habits are flaunted in the face of students, and a man whose disregard for the changing times makes him expendable. The SES report recognized this paradox. Their report on overseas study recommended strong committees to administer each campus. The effect of the restructuring would be to strip Walker of his power by forcing him to co opt five sets of students and faculty rather than one. The Academic Senate, however, realized the flaw in the plan: without a strong central committee, any kind of coordination within the program would be impossible. Hence, they added a strong central committee to the SES proposal. Recognizing that the new system might well continue Walker's direction of the program, the DAILY took the unusual step of devoting a full page of its January 30 issue to Walker, whose continuation as director the DAILY strongly felt was a serious threat to the viability of the program. The most telling points in the DAILY'S articles were devastating and beyond reasonable rationalization. The team of six reporters found that Walker had in at least three instances suspended students without any trial, thus abrogating the right guaranteed students in the ASSU Constitution and the Legislative and Judicial Charter. Walker simply told the DAILY that he had adjudicated the cases on individual merits. A letter to British campus director Jack Rumbold about one student there who was suspended merely said that the future of the campus was in peril because it was a drug case, and the British authorities were strict with drug cases. The letter showed no concern for the guilt or innocence of the girl. Walker also said that the girl involved could not return since she would return late: unfortunately Walker had no idea of the truth. The girl could easily have returned in time. Among other information revealed in the DAILY article were the facts that at the Austrian campus the chief was given 32d a day for food for each student, and that the University lost $48,000 on the move from Harlaxton to Cliveden. Dr. Walker's reply: food isn't that important. No reply was given about the loss on the move to Cliveden, but none was really necessary. The University had signed a seven year lease on Harlaxton, a building which it originally had no intention of using for seven years. When Cliveden came along, the University was forced to buy back the Harlaxton lease at an outrageous price. The essence of the DAILY'S plaint was that Walker ran the program dictatorially through faculty members he had bribed with stints overseas: a nearly impossible accusation to prove. Yet the truth of the accusation is beyond reasonable doubt. The SES Overseas study report made this its implicit assumption. But what is most significant is the ultimate question of governance: can the old style administrators pass the torch to a new generation? The answer to that question is more important than Robert Walker, his misadministration, and overseas specifics. The answer to that question is the answer to the future of the University. The faculty response to Walker will ultimately help answer that question. 84 85 86 87 administration President Kenneth Pitzer Kenneth S. Pitzer has now been President of Stanford for more than a year. He has not been highly visible, even in times of stress. His name is sometimes affixed to various administrative pronouncements, but it is doubtful that more than a few students and not many more faculty would even recognize him as he walked through White Plaza at high noon. Much of what he does is hidden from direct view. Fund-raising, to which he delegates some of his time, has no direct and immediate meaning for students, although its long-range effect is great. President Pitzer has not been simply a traditional college president. He has spoken out publicly on contemporary issues, specifically the Vietnam War. As evidence of his commitment to reform in the University he has appointed the Chairman of the Study of Education at Stanford, Willard Wyman, as a Special Assistant to implement the SES. He also pushed for the reorganization of the Board of Trustees. He, along with the rest of the administration and faculty, is now engaged in the sensitive and painful task of cutting $2.5 million from the budget in the next four years. These cuts, necessitated by a decline in federal research allocations, will thoroughly test the ability of the President and his advisors to define the goals of Stanford in light of these new conditions, and to further those goals despite heavy pressures from various interest groups. Indications from the past year suggest that President Pitzer is capable of doing just this. His refusal to officially support the Moratorium by closing the University, although he had stated that he supported it reveals a sense of balanced judgment that should serve him and his administration well during the budget crisis. His reaction to the AEL and Encina sit-ins last spring make clear his ability to meet stressful situations without further aggravating them. His restrained actions (admittedly aided by a less militant radical contingent) during the crises of last spring almost certainly kept Stanford from exploding into the kind of melee that Nathan Pusey helped cause at Harvard. It is hoped that those characteristics that have surfaced in the Pitzer administration during the past year will help Stanford over the inevitably rocky road ahead. 88 (Left) President Pitzer enters Dinkelspiel Auditorium for the Academic Council meeting concerning ROTC March 2. (Below) Michael Sweeney and Diamond McGuire, members of the New Moratorium, staple an anti-ROTC petition to the President's door. 89 Mr. Baldwin Robertson 6815 Selkirk Drive Bethesda, Md. 20034 Board of Trustees Dear Mr. Robertson: Your letter addressed to The Underground Press was delivered to the President's Office, and I am returning your check to you. We have no way of getting in touch with the people who stole these documents from the Controller's Office last spring. If we did, we'd have them arrested. Sincerely yours, Frederic 0. Glover Executive Assistant to the President 90 First row: Ben C. Duniway, Robert M. Brown, Thomas P. Pike, W. P. Fuller III, Arthur C. Stewart, Richard E. Guggenhime; Second row: Otis A. Pease, Mrs. Allan E. Charles, President K. S. Pitzer, Mrs. Jesse E. Nichols, William R. Hewlett; Third row: J. E. Wallace Sterling, Fred H. Merrill, Roger Lewis, Thomas V. Jones, Provost R. W. Lyman The characteristic that most distinguishes the administration from all other factions of the Stanford community is that it directs and coordinates the teaching, learning, and research activities that define the function of Stanford, but does not engage directly in these activities itself. Its primary function is not to describe, explain, or understand our world, but to function within it and bridge the gap to the ivory tower. Because it cannot merely suggest, cajole, or influence, but must also make concrete decisions affecting the total University, it stands more open to criticism by both students and faculty than either of these factions themselves. By necessity it lacks the wide diversity of outlook and opinion that characterize the students and faculty because its very function requires that it set specific policies as a unit, in contrast to the other elements. The administration is easily identifiable in regard to the goals and policies it sets, and hence can never hope to please all of the plethora of opinions represented by the rest of the Stanford community. It can and does, however, draw ideas and influence from students and faculty. Indeed, the interconnections between it and the rest of the community are many, and the distinction often fuzzy. It changes and re-evaluates its goals and policies as students and faculty do the same, and while the administration is more than a mere servant to the academic community, it exists only because of that community and to help it move toward its goals. In the process it both defines and is defined by the other elements of the University. The Trustees stand at the head of the total University structure, but the administration is its particular representative within that structure. Again, the relationship between the Trustees and the administration is by no means one way, while it is guided bv Trustee policy. Frederic Glover Executive Assistant to the President the administration has a large part in setting that policy and in interpreting it as it is put into operation. Due to the pressures from within the University, the Trustees have undertaken a major reorganization this year in hopes of appeasing the challenges to its legitimacy. In order to shirk the image of a self-perpetuating white businessmen's clique, the board is expanding to thirty-two members. Four of the nine new members will be under thirty-five years old, four will be over thirty-five, and all will be elected by the alumni. The ninth new member will be the President himself. Two current vacancies will be filled by faculty members from other universities, and students and faculty will have voting membership on most Trustee committees. As a result of these changes it is hoped that the Board will better represent the society it is supposed to serve, and that it will be more under the control of the people whose lives it influences. Due to the widening of the selection procedure there can be little doubt the Trustees will become a more diverse body. These changes do not represent a real attempt to put the Trustees under any direct control of those who are presently involved in the University. They also reject even more radical suggestions that the community should govern itself. Whether these changes are only steps toward more radical answers, or are sufficient to appease the pressures for change is a question that will be answered as the University reacts to the functioning of the newly constituted Board. They do seem to represent a willingness to respond to pressures (albeit very slowly) that originate within Stanford, and perhaps to be even more flexibly sensitive to such pressures in the future. 91 Kenneth Cuthbertson Vice-President for Finance Lyle Nelson Director, University Relations 92 The Study of Education at Stanford is moving into its final phase, and in many ways this will be its most severe test. Gone is the drama and enthusiasm that accompanied its initiation. Gone, too, are the obvious impediments to academic and social reform which so many joined together to remove. Now-without the impetus with which the Study started, without the excitement of framing the major questions and cutting away outmoded restrictions-the University is confronted with the difficult task or rebuilding, of replacing the old order with a new one-one dedicated to injecting into our academic community new stimulation and vigor. That assignment is exacting. It is one thing at a university to recognize what is wrong and to determine what must be done to right that wrong, but quite another to find the means-the commitment in time and money and even courage-to bring those changes about. But it is clear that is what we must do, that while the previous two years have been ones of investigation, criticism and freeing ourselves from the shackles of outmoded conventions, the next two years must be ones of structuring and rebuilding. The Study has jarred the educational sensibilities of us all; surely we are better for that. There is involvement of students and faculty; there is communication; there is a determination to take full advantage of all our educational potential. Now all those qualities must be brought to bear on a new ordering of our intellectual resources. But there are problems: Where before the lines of authority were too clear, the lines of communication too limited, we now have so many means of communication, so many committees with overlapping authority that we are in danger of being strangled by them. Where before the General Studies requirements provided a maze through which it was difficult, at best, to move with any sense of academic continuity, we now place students in the midst of our rich and varied academic offerings with virtually no signposts to guide them toward the continuity we originally sought. With the new shaping of our administration and our curriculum, those problems should be solved. In fact much of the rebuilding to be done will be accomplished with the appointment of the new Undergraduate Dean and a more clear designation of his responsibilities and resources. But it is important that we not rest there or, indeed, even when all the many proposals of the Study have been adequately dealt with. The Study of Education at Stanford's real success will be in leaving with us a sustained spirit of self-examination, one which will lead to a continual renewal of educational possibilities. If we mean to provide the people who study and work here with a deep and lasting sense of intellectual enrichment, we have no choice but to perpetuate this quest. -Willard Wyman Willard Wyman Special Assistant to the President 93 James Simmons Assistant to the President The office of Assistant to the President for Black Affairs is a recently created administrative position at Stanford. The Office serves as a viable liaison between the Black Communities of Stanford and East Palo Alto and the University Administration and Faculty. The Office advises the President, Administrative Officers, and Faculty relative to programs, policies, and procedures as they effect the 8lack Communities. The Office also assists student organizations, individual students, and community organizations in the development of programs and projects designed to facilitate the educational experiences of the Black student. The Office of Assistant to the President-for Black Affairs-seeks to provide leadership opportunities for Black students both at Stanford and in the local community. The office can best be described as service oriented—offering a variety of services to students, the local Black Community, and other segments of the University. The office is a positive, constructive, and creative force for change and progress. —James Simmons 94 Luis Nogales Assistant to the President E. Howard Brooks Vice Provost 95 Robert Walker Director of Overseas Campuses The University Adjusts Even a cursory stroll across the Stanford campus persuades one that the University is gripped by rapid change. The obvious new buildings and malls are convincing signs-and it is true, as these signs may imply, that the University is changing operationally as well as physically. Some of the operational changes that Stanford is undertaking reflect the growth in the numbers of its students and its faculty. Some are conscious adaptations to introspective self-study, as well as to changing circumstances in the work at large. Still others reflect people, changes in and among those whose responsibility it is to manage the affairs of the University. But in the presence of so much change it is nevertheless true that some things are unaltered, and most important among these things must be the continued pursuit of academic excellence. The quest is made more difficult by the constraints of a worsened financial situation, and so the University must exercise increasing care in allocating its resources. Established structural models of the University's organizations, of which I am aware, all include a broad base of channels for student participation in the governance of the community. And all include a range of non-curricular services to be provided by the University to its students. The models differ one from another not only as to the depth and extent of student involvement and services to be provided, but also as to the nature and composition of the staff and resources that will be committed to Student Affairs. Although it is impossible to be certain about a detailed pattern of what will exist in the long-range future, I think one can usefully speculate about the general thrust of short term changes. Clearly, anyone who has studied the University's problems knows that no University function now can long escape scrutiny, assessment, and judgment of its usefulness. This assessment and evaluation is now going on, and will continue, in areas which are the responsibility of the Dean of Students. The result of this study will, I believe, result in more efficient use of resources, both in people, plant, and dollars. Thus we are seeking, as an example, more efficient means to utilize residence personnel. And importantly, the general opinion of the student body as well as the participation of specific students is being sought in accomplishing this end. In the process, I believe two desirable results will be achieved. The first is that decisions will reflect, insofar as practicable, the feelings and concerns of the student body and second, as groups meet to seek change in the University, administrators and faculty alike will become more aware of and sensitive to student interests, and more able to address students' needs. Of two things we all can be assured, that attention to the quality of student life is an inescapable responsibility of the University administration, and that the highest councils of the University are appropriate places for the advocacy of student concerns. As far as the structure of the Dean of Students' Office is concerned, it surely will change as time goes on, and I hope, evolve centrally as a focus of sensitivity to student interests. -Peter Bulkeley 96 Richard Lyman Vice President and Provost Peter Bulkeley Dean of Students 97 Robert Glazer Vice President for Medical Affairs Nineteen Sixty-Six to Nineteen Seventy I remember Pre-Reg Convocation in Frost almost four years ago, when I spoke for the first time to God and man at Stanford. ... in respect to Thee, O Lord, we arc not of one mind: some of us believe; some of us have sung Thy funeral dirge; and some of us, most of us, are unsure of Thee... This of course is still true. It is as it must be. The last of the sixties and the beginning of the seventies has not been a time for theologizing. There is a sense, nevertheless, in which we are a more religious generation than any that has gone before us. The single most impressive quality of life at Stanford in these four years is the depth and breadth of compassion for the family of man, and the fervent protest, taking many forms, against the devices of dehumanization, from the campus to the nation to the world. And so wo pray, in this time of new beginnings, in faith or unfaith, for Stanford University, for thy servants Richard Guggenhime, Wallace Sterling, and David Harris... Mr. Guggenhime was then serving with intelligence and devotion as Chairman of the Board of Trustees, a body whose character and constituency have been changed to a degree we would not have thought possible four years ago. President Sterling, whose administration transformed Stanford into one of this nation's most distinguished universities, has been succeeded by President Pitzer; and in the face of swift and inexorable change, Mr. Pitzer is responding in new and creative ways to Old Stanford and New Stanford. David Harris is in prison. Responsible, in measure more than any other single person, for Stanford's emancipation from bondage to the past, he is in prison in witness at once to his own integrity, to the moral derailment of America, and to the proposition that the business of life is life, not death. Be pleased, we beseech Thee, to grant Thy continuing favor to Stanford University, and to these her youngest members such light and wisdom as each may require, so that when they leave this place, they may have knowledge and courage enough to stem the tides of malice and violence which plague this magnificent, terrible, wonderful, awful, crazy, beautiful world. Many of those youngest members are soon leaving; and on the strength of what I have seen and learned and experienced in their company during these four years, I affirm my hope that those tides may indeed be turned back. And I make the affirmation with unspeakable gratitude to students and other colleagues who have been my companions in these tense, sometimes frantic, but always moving and productive years. —B. D. Napier 98 ( � t B. Davie Napier Dean of the Chapel Alt Brandin Vice-President for Business Affairs 99 Fred Hargadon Dean of Admissions A Search for Excellence To the 1400 young men and women who entered Stanford as freshmen this past fall, our admissions process probably seems obviously efficient, uniquely perceptive, or extraordinarily sanguine. To the over 7,000 applicants who were not admitted, that same process appears either inscrutable or arbitrary or, more frequently, a combination of the two. At both ends of the scale and at hundred of points in between lie the opinions of the faculty, administration, upperclassmen, coaches, alumni, principals, guidance counselors, friends, and the populace of the surrounding communities. That the admissions process should be so differently perceived seems only natural in light of the number of participants involved, the great variety of interests at stake, and the complex nature of the judgments to be rendered in selecting a freshman class each year. However, when such varied perceptions are accompanied by the equally natural tendency to generalize from one's own experience, the final results of the annual admissions process ultimately generate literally hundreds of artificial stereotypes regarding both the University itself and the typical” Stanford student. In the school or community where we have accepted the more personable and interesting young man or woman, passing over the precocious youngster who ranked higher in the class, we have created one particular image of Stanford. In another school or community, where we have accepted the most brilliant student, passing over the young man or woman less academically but more warmly recommended, we have created quite another and different image. Or, for instance, the alumni parents of children who are not admitted invariably see the University in quite a different light than those whose children have been admitted. Aside from the role understandably played by intense personal interest (and disappointment) in the creation of such images, the human needs to rationalize and categorize experiences make it especially difficult for an institution as diverse and complex in its nature and goals as Stanford to adequately project a public image which is both truly representative of such diversity and complexity and at the same time credible to one and all. The traditions which are associated with the University, as well as the public (and, increasingly, the private) lives of its alumni and present student body, both augment and complicate the task. Like the seven blind men who each, upon feeling a different part of the elephant, described seven quite distinct animals, so also do quite different (and often contradictory) stereotypes become attached to Stanford. Institutions beget images and images beget stereotypes and a great many high school seniors and their counselors make preliminary judgments about colleges and universities based on these stereotypes. For this reason, the entire problem of such self-selection based on erroneous or incomplete conceptions remains a primary concern of our admissions staff, causing us to spend nearly two-thirds of each year simply communicating with students, schools and parents in an effort to continually generate and maintain an applicant pool sufficiently diverse and competent to enable us to annually enroll an interesting and able freshman class. While it is very unlikely that Stanford can ever avoid being sterotyped, it is our hope to diminish the role such stereotypes play in the college-going process. 100 —Fred Hargadon o Michael Tooley Philosophy The Case for Atheism Religious beliefs will not withstand rational scrutiny. This is an extremely sweeping statement, and obviously there is no question of defending it here. What I shall do is merely indicate some considerations that have been advanced against one particularly important religious belief: the traditional belief in God. What reasons are there for not believing in God? The first reason for not believing in God is simply that there is no reason to believe in God. One's reason for not believing in gremlins and leprechauns is not that one has positive evidence against their existence, but simply that one has no evidence in support of it. Belief in God should be treated in the same way. But there are also positive objections to belief in God's existence. First, there is the observed dependence of mind upon body. Our experience indicates that whether a person has experiences, and what experiences he has, is dependent upon the state of his brain. But the concept of God is the concept of a person without a body. Hence to believe in God is to believe in the existence of something that is contrary to the evidence we have that mental states always depend upon bodily states. Secondly, there is the problem of the hiddenness of God. Even those who believe in God admit that his existence is far from obvious. Why should this be so? If God did exist, this would surely be a most important fact for men to know, so one would expect God to make his existence at least as evident as that of the physical world. Since the existence of God is not thus evident, one can only conclude that God does not exist. Thirdly, there is the problem of suffering. It is surely reasonable to believe the world would be a better place if most suffering were eliminated. If so, then it is also reasonable to believe that God would want to eliminate this suffering, since, being morally perfect, he will want to improve the world. Being omniscient he will know of the suffering, and being omnipotent he will have the power to eliminate it. But the suffering is not being eliminated. Hence the only reasonable conclusion to draw is that God does not exist. Given the many obvious and extremely pressing practical problems that confront mankind: poverty, overpopulation, pollution, the failure of traditional political institutions to formulate policies that reflect the genuine needs of individuals, the inability of the educational system to produce people who can deal realistically with the problems they constantly encounter in everyday life, and so on, why should one bother to state the case for atheism? Doesn't such concern with religious beliefs betray rather badly misplaced priorities? I don't think this is entirely true. How one approaches social problems, and the solutions one finds acceptable, both depend heavily upon what religious views one accepts. This is especially obvious in the case of the problem of overpopulation. Getting clear about one's religious beliefs is valuable because it helps one get clear about one's moral values, and getting clear about one's moral values is worthwhile in that it helps one in thinking about social problems, as well as in deciding what to make of one's own life. —Michael Tooley 102 Matthew Kahn Art 103 William Clebsch Humanities Who taught what to whom may be moot, but what was learned at Stanford during the tenure of the Class of '70 is clear: The modern university is a fragile-maybe perishable-organization. It takes very few to damage Stanford; only all its members can make it thrive. To call the university an organization rather than an organism is to take a metaphor connoting free will. An organism automatically commands its parts to repel an invader or expel a member that attacks the whole. The university, on the other hand, preserves and advances itself not by command but by the choice of its diverse members to will its welfare. In a highly differentiated organization, each member needs the others. There are many rwccssary parts-students, teachers, researchers, administrators, trustees, staff, alumni, donors, even the good graces of the body politick. Surely student militancy can bring things to a halt, at least for a painful time; that much we know. But so might militancy in any other member; it is good to remember that student power to harm or interrupt is no greater than the power of the faculty wives' club or the groundskeepers. To identify who can harm Stanford is simple. To understand how many it takes to nourish Stanford is difficult. No constituency is interchangeable for long with another. Each has its task to perform, in articulation with all the others. That articulation implies criticism as well as support; it includes protest and excludes disruption; it demands change by all, with ossification as the only alternative. My colleagues on the faculty learned while the Class of '70 was with us that administrators need our advice and consent, and that faculty need students' advice and consent. We fashioned a new instrument of faculty government. We saw much done to reform student government into a force for supporting and improving the common enterprise of education (and these last words most of all I would regret having to eat when, several months after they are written, they appear in print). Certainly trustees and administrators enter the new decade in a new style of partnership with students and faculty and staff and alumni. We are learning how important is each one of many parts; we must simultaneously learn how completely each part needs and must support the others. Such an organization is indeed fragile, and fragility elicits not a little anxiety in one who cherishes the organization. But beyond anxiety there is confidence. What may once have mastered its members becomes fragile when its members master it. Thus whatever is not fragile today is not truly human, and may not be worth keeping in the days ahead. The risk is high. Stanford as a plural, voluntary organization will be as great as all its members make it, and no greater. Yet in making it whatever it is to be we make it our own. And we will be the better for having willed its betterment. -William Clebsch 104 William Rivers Communications The Student as Adversary A few months ago, I sent to my publisher the manuscript of a book entitled The Adversaries: Politics and the Press. The manuscript was not mine alone. I wrote about half of it; the rest was made up primarily of case studies by thirteen of my students. In due time, the publisher returned the manuscript with suggestions for revision. This is customary procedure in publishing, but in this case it is worth remarking. All the suggestions pointed to need for revision in my writing and research; except for a few items that needed updating, the contributions of my students were deemed ready for publication. Now it is true that the basic idea for the book was mine. It is also true that I outlined for the students the notion on which their investigations should be based: that journalists should strike an adversary stance in tneir dealings with public officials. Briefly, this springs from the roots of the democratic idea that the people must be informed if democratic government is to work—and the corollary idea that public officials should not be alone in providing the information. Abraham Lincoln said that in this and like communities, public sentiment is everything. Without a challenging journalism, officialdom is quite likely to win public sentiment for its own goals. But the important fact is that the students took this notion, embellished it, and taught me that it was oversimplified. Their case studies (and some of the challenging little newspapers published by students and recent graduates) helped me to understand how limited my original thoughts had been. In the era of the military-industrial-education complex, the need for adversity does not end with government. Most of the institutions of modern society are inextricably involved in governmental action. These, too, must be questioned and their actions probed-all must be subjected to one of the sharpest weapons of democratic life, pitiless publicity. Almost instinctively, it seems, students today are alert to the need for an adversary stance. Perhaps it is because they look at modern society with fresh eyes. They see the comfortable moralities with which my generation rationalizes its failings, and they are aghast. Properly. It is difficult, perhaps impossible, for those of us who were reared in an atmosphere of respect for property, and for civility in all things, to understand the corrective actions that the modern college generation sometimes pursues. Certainly, we are aghast at the excesses of some of the free-lance wild men. But we can learn from the many other young activists the meaning and the value of being an adversary of a sick society. Perhaps we can learn to appreciate them by altering slightly a familiar saying: He is a barbarian who thinks that the customs of his generation are the laws of the universe. -William Rivers 105 Robert Hofstadter Physics Albert Guerard English 106 I came to Stanford two years ago with a rather conventional set of preconceived notions about the nature of the university. I came, of course, expecting to find that mythological community of teachers and students mutually engaged and committed to the intellectual life so immortalized in print. These ill-founded notions failed to last beyond my first taste of campus life. Rather than entering the ivory tower, it occurred to me that I had entered one of the principal conflict arenas in American life. On reflection, this should not have unduly surprised me. Scholars have pointed out that we have entered what might be termed the post-industrial or technological era, an era in which knowledge becomes requisite to power, an era in which knowledge supplements or even supplants land, labor, and capital as the main resources of societal power and influence. It is within that context that the current tensions on our own campus, or campuses in general become explicable. The struggle over who shall receive the benefits of knowledge becomes central to the question of who get what? in a society. That type of struggle has always engendered severe conflict, and I daresay, it always will. It is now clear that the contemporary multi-university does not distribute its knowledge randomly. It is, to a great extent, engaged in providing services for a number of important sectors of our society, primarily industry, government agencies and the military. These are Edward Greenberg Political Science the sectors which are able to underwrite the enormous costs of modern scientific and social scientific research. Inevitably, a mutuality of viewpoint, interest and service seems to emerge. Many students, particularly third world and radical students, have demanded that the university redirect its energies and resources towards the needs of communities hithertofore ignored. The demands are exacerbated by the vision that students, faculty and students have of each other. Students are angered by what they interpret as the hypocrisy of the faculty. Faculty and administration have tended to see student demands as an attack on the very university itself, and by extension, their own place within it. If we indeed have entered the post-industrial society, there is no way that campus conflict will disappear. We are destined to live with it as a constant. What we can attempt to do is to limit the intensity of the conflict. We must devote our energies to a continuing dialogue about the preferred shape of the university. We must rethink the very concept of the academic life. We must evolve alternatives that do not disadvantage some groups and favor others. We must egalitarianize knowledge, and cease our contribution to the stratification of society. Until we devote ourselves to this introspection, the university will remain an arena for intense social conflict. -Edward Greenberg 10 7 Brooks Otis Classics My eleven years at Stanford have seen big changes of which perhaps the recent student awakening is the biggest. But I do not think that the student awakening would have been possible without the preceding development,-the rise of Stanford to the front rank of American universities. The great question now is: where do we go from here? To a certain extent-the extent can be easily exaggerated-the student is no longer docile. He does not take the university for granted. He asks specific questions about its financing and its government and its ethics. But there lies behind all these the bigger questions of the university's purpose. What does the student get or what should he get out of all the complicated machinery of departments, courses, libraries, laboratories, professors and administrators? Some say that the university is and should be neutral and that beyond guaranteeing freedom of research, teaching and learning, it should stand for no single purpose or cause. I think this is a very doubtful principle that needs to be rethought. Even freedom depends upon certain positive conditions and actions. And for what ought the student to be free? The fact is that the university every day establishes priorities which determine the kind of education the student can get. It can emphasize one department or school over another and by its appointment procedures determine the nature and goals of individual departments and schools. What do we want taught? How should it be taught? What direction should we give to research? These are the great questions that we must never obscure under a smokescreen of academic freedom. My plea to students is that they try to penetrate the smokescreen. Academic freedom like economic laissez-faire can cover a multitude of sins, including particularly the sin of inertia. But academic freedom is also a sort of goose that occasionally lays golden eggs. This, too, the student might well remember. We have, I think, both here at Stanford and in the rest of the country (Stanford is not at all unique in this respect) lost sight of the ends of education in a complicated plethora of means. The problem is, as always, what concretely we can do. It is of course easy to appoint a committee like SES. But SES shows also the limitations of a committee. It has done on the whole a good job of clearing the ground, of eliminating obsolete requirements. It has not come up with any new idea of a university, any serious reexamination of the university's function. What I would like to see now at Stanford is some student initiative (not another student-faculty committee) perhaps expressed in the form of a new serious publication or journal or in some sort of organization that will be a focus of discussion and excitement and influence. No existing journal or organization quite meets this bill. The great thing now is to attack the central problems, to be radical in a deep and fundamental way. -Brooks Otis 108 Karl deLeeuw Mathematics John Goheen Philosophy 109 On the Values of Men and Machines Men and machines (including computers) are so very different—men preferring creative, rule-free, non-logical, inductive activities carried out at modest speed, and machines being capable of logical, structured, repetitive, high-speed performance with precise memory recall—that they are not really competitors at all for the same type of work. If, in a given situation, machines do take over the work of a man or group of men, then their work must of necessity have been mechanistic, repetitive, and in this sense less than human to begin with. Consequently, the machine takeover of mechanistic tasks done by humans, particularly if they free man for doing much more human activities, has desirable aspects. But for the growing class of sophisticated, complex tasks wherein the best capabilities both man and machine are operating together to solve the problem, such as in highway traffic planning, large construction project management, medical information management, and keeping an organization's books of account, the problem becomes one of design of an integrated man-machine system. Implicit in the design of such a system are the assumptions, or ground rules, or values underlying the specific design choices made. These deal both with the relative assignments of specific tasks between the man, the machine, and the method with which they communicate with each other. As to task allocation, some things are rather obvious such as the assignment to the machine of the primary memory burden, the computation tasks, and most of the other data handling and housekeeping chores. The designer should allocate to the man overall policy-setting functions, the selection of goals and measures of performance in achieving those goals, the other creative aspects of the task to be done. But implicit in the design are the more subtle values: Is the machine trustworthy-able to store accurately private information given it and reproduce it precisely only for the people you select? Is the machine helpful—that is, will it list and help you to understand the alternative actions that you can take? Is the machine friendly —that is, will it pleasantly prompt you as to what errors have been made in your selection of alternatives or will it in a rather rude manner print out garbage or invalid request and then sit there doing nothing? Is the machine patient and forgiving when mistakes are made by the user, and will it provide the user with an opportunity to change his request statement without penalty? Whether or not values of this sort-some of the more desirable human values-are in fact the primary underlying values of man-machine system is important to the overall behavior of the system, but will occur only if they are consciously included in the system design and programming effort. If they are not, what will probably happen-or what seems to have happened in systems developed so far-are that by default, the more mechanistic, structured, logical, precise, efficient values get included instead. The best of all worlds seems to be that the machine have a subculture with its own mechanistic values involving things it knows how to do quite well, such as handle data structures with rigorous logic, and the man's subculture be based on values at which he excells, such as creative, not-always-logical inductive synthesis and design behavior, and the culture of the man-machine system be dominated primarily by the human values. Whether or not this happens is really up to all of us. HO -David Thompson David Thompson Industrial Engineering John Flores German 111 David Potter History St. Clair Drake Anthropology 112 Science in the 1970's is under attack from two quarters: By those who blame it for the excesses of technology which are spoiling our environment and which endanger the world through nuclear war, and from the other direction by the conservatives who feel that Science has not proven its worth in purely economic terms. The social critics point at pollution, the arms race, and the traffic jams and make Science the whipping boy, while the conservatives are disturbed by the intellectual approach of scientists and the criticism of the status quo which it engenders. The social critics proclaim that there exists a state of emergency and that as in the Second World War scientists should drop their fundamental research and work on immediately socially relevant problems. What both sides ignore is that if we are to bring technology under control lest it dominate us. Science will play an essential part and this role of Science will be needed for a long time; the problems of the environment will not be solved during the next few years. In order to accommodate the large number of people on this planet we need the very best science can offer to make this possible without spoiling the earth. Over the long haul we will need not only the contribution of trained and experienced scientists towards this end but also new basic research results which will continue to be produced mainly by these scientists who are motivated only by their interest in the nature of matter and not by practical applications. —Wolfgang Panofsky Wolfgang Panofsky Director of SLAC 113 David Kennedy History One studies history, said R. G. Collingwood, in order to understand three things: what it means to be a man different from all other men. Historical inquiry teaches us first of all our humanity, because it compels the use of our highest faculties, intelligence and imagination, to discover meaning and order in the chaos of human experience. History, in other words, is an art, though an art bounded always by the recalcitrance of its material, the intractable reality of the past. One might say that the historian's work resembles the sculptor's, in the sense that Michelangelo described it. Michelangelo's statues were assuredly triumphs of the imagination; but he explained that he only liberated forms already contained within the marble. The sculptor, he said, simply hewed away the excess stone in order to reveal the interior pattern. The historian, both as teacher and as scholar, proceeds in much the same fashion-hewing and chipping and paring his data to bring a meaningful account out of confusion -but an account, he hopes, that only manifests the latent logic of the past events themselves. If students only see the final product, however flawed, they should be mindful of the invisible and lonely labors which made that product at all intelligible. One also studies history in order to comprehend one's own brief historical moment. History seeks that comprehension in two ways. First, and obviously, history is what might be called a genetic study: it tries to explain the origins and development of the institutions, ideas, and mores that preoccupy the present. Perhaps less obviously, history serves as a counter-balance to the present. It affords the opportunity to weigh our ideas and practices against those of the past. It allows us, in other words, to transcend the present and see how different men thought and acted in circumstances different from our own. History is, therefore, doubly relevant : first, because it explains the roots of the present, and second because it broadens our understanding of what other men have found relevant” in their experience. This latter function of history is indispensable if we are to find our individuality in an age of insistent standardization. And that is what Collingwood meant when he said that history teaches what it means to be a man different from all other men. For when an individual assumes that for him only those concerns are relevant that the present dictates he is not free; he is, rather, attenuated, one-dimensional, not simply a child, but a victim of the present. -David Kennedy 114 Joseph Paff Political Science Jeffery Smith Humanities 115 Patricia Sokolove Biology Daniel Mendelowitz Art 116 Knowledge of a foreign tongue has long been deemed an indispensable attribute of the well educated man. I have met few students who seriously challenge this notion, few who are not prompt to state that in a world shrunk small by the speed and ease of travel, language learning is crucial if not imperative. Whether it be the increased value of tourism, the pleasure of conversing with foreigners, the personal satisfaction of reading, the practical value of studying an untranslated text or establishing business relations with another country, so long as different languages exist in this world we share, there will be good reason to study them. How ironic it is that Stanford, along with many other universities and colleges in the country, has ceased to require language as part of one's general education. We are still too close to the event to be able to predict with any certainty the consequences or the final outcome. One can only hope that, even without the pressure of a requirement, we will not lose sight in this country of the ultimate value of language study. Language learning has significant value beyond the immediate one of acquiring the basic elements necessary for communication. Learning a language is not a question of memorizing vocabulary lists, it is not the rote recitation of verb paradigms, adjective declensions, pattern sentences or dialogues. It is not, above all, merely arriving at the sense of a passage by translating it, only to leave the words behind as empty shells. This would be to treat words as mechanical symbols rather than as living entities, the results of man's effort to organize the world he lives in. The multiplicity of ways in which different languages shape as well as record man's encounter with the world and his self-analysis is a source of endless fascination which the student comes to share in the learning process. To encourage this, teaching a language must then involve establishing in a given context relationships which permit not only the transference of knowledge but creativity as well. This is particularly true in the elementary language courses which are taught entirely in the foreign tongue. Man is a creator of sentences. From the start, the teacher must demonstrate this. He becomes a magicien du verbe, a magician of words producing marvellous discourse even when the total vocabulary may not exceed a handful of words. When the student realizes that he too can do the same thing, the miracle of speaking a foreign language and the act of understanding a foreign culture have begun. For the student, the limited but functional world of the classroom discussion: reporting personal experiences, discussing a given topic, analyzing a piece of literature, enables him to escape the optic of his native tongue, to become conscious of and appreciate differing points of view, to engage in a creative process of self-expression. Many students' originality is released in a foreign language in ways which would be impossible in their own, where the inhibitions of maturity and self-consciousness often stifle individual expression. The contributions to the annual literary contest, held by the department of French and Italian, consistently reveal the artistry and sensitivity of the students. Many who had never thought of writing are able to give clear and even poignant expression to their ideas and feelings in a language which they have just begun to control. Each year their writings reflect the changing emotional and intellectual climate at Stanford. The university is a place of encounter where students with energy, enthusiasm and inquisitiveness meet the substance of what is the full range and density of man's intellectual and practical achievements. Assimilating this order provides comfort. Creating new order involves struggle, but it brings its own rewards: pride of accomplishment, the satisfaction of asserting one's individuality in a constructive spirit. It would seem to me the task of teachers and students alike to strive towards this goal whatever their discipline. -John Barson John Barson French 117 Norman Wessells Biology Perspective for Pre-Meds Premedical students, more than any other group of pre-professional undergraduates, are subjected to extraordinary pressures during their entire university experience. From the first day at Stanford until that fateful moment in senior year with the letter from the desired medical school arrives, each premed is continually reminded of the stiffness of his race. The competition, the stresses of being part of an above-average group in an already outstanding undergraduate body, are the things that tend to undermine the educational process by setting the wrong goals as the motivation for learning. It is essential that faculty engaged in teaching the pivotal premed courses not respond to that premed syndrome with cynicism and intolerance, but instead attempt to minimize the tendency to learn for the wrong reasons. This is not because our particular courses or disciplines are holy and deserving of extraordinary attention for their own sake. Much more important, we occupy a critical point in the educational experience of physicians. The premed must be taught the language of science—calculus, familiarity with inorganic and organic molecules and their workings, the ways of living organisms-and that, by and large, is not difficult to accomplish. To inculcate a true sense of perspective, a broad view of how living organisms operate, is much more difficult, but perhaps of even greater importance. It is so very easy in later years, when immersed in the immense sea of facts of medical education, to lose or ignore the unifying overview that, to my mind, is essential for any truly perceptive and successful physician or medical scientist. So, by attempting to imbue such a view at a time when the premedical student is first learning how a scientist thinks, one can perhaps add a real and substantial increment to the quality of the final physician. And that is certainly a fitting task for any premedical educator. At the undergraduate level, the stresses of the MCAT's and tight admissions policies aggravate the relevance issue so as to cause some premeds to seriously question the value of obtaining a broad view of biological systems. Equivalent questioning of the relevance of basic science goes on among current medical students, as you in the class of 1970 will soon be aware. I would argue that you should not succumb to the notion that concentration upon clinical medicine and upon social aspects of medicine will suffice to make you an optimally useful doctor. Although reorganization of the medical community and of the distribution of medical care in our society is indeed a legitimate concern for all physicians, such concern or interest will be of little use when you as a physician are in face-to-face contact with a sick individual. Then there is only one thing that counts-your abilities of diagnosis and knowledge of optimal therapy. Each year, as medicine becomes more of a science and less of an art, our increasing knowledge of the chemical and cellular basis of disease allows better medical care to be rendered. In your useful lifetime as a physician immense advances in medical knowledge will be made, but they will only be of use to you and to your patients if you have the kind of education that will permit you to understand and to intelligently apply new findings. In no small measure, then, the ultimate satisfactions obtainable from your professional life may well rest upon your attitudes and reasons for learning, your decisions with respect to curricular choices, and your commitment toward excellence in medical scholarship. -Norman Wessells 118 Social Lessons in Science Three lessons from the physical sciences seem especially helpful in providing insight into the functioning of social institutions. 1) The Second Law of Thermodynamics indicates that physical systems degenerate spontaneously or easily. On the other hand, it takes great effort to make a system synthesize into a more meaningful state. For example, a random kick can make a television set inoperative. However, to make it work again requires the great effort of locating the defective component, collecting the raw materials, and synthesizing them into the component. Murphy's Law covers the same ground in pointing out that in any field of scientific endeavor, if anything can possibly go wrong, it will. The Second Law seems also to apply to social institutions. Man's inability to produce a completely satisfactory method of government despite thousands of years of effort illustrates this. History and current events deal profusely with the revolutionary who is successful in accelerating the destruction of a government but is unsuccessful in synthesizing a viable replacement. 2) Physical systems change in response to changed external inputs. Irwin Remson Geology known as boundary conditions. The same is true of social systems. The invention of a birth control pill and the emergence of a new philosophy in Thailand are changed boundary conditions. Social systems must change in response. 3) Scientists usually require elaborate experiments to predict with certainty how a system will change in response to an external input. The likelihood of predicting the response of a social system to changing input conditions is even more remote. Here then is the dilemma. Society and government must change in response to changing inputs. Contrary to conservative thought, they cannot remain static. Contrary to radical thought, most of the very large changes will probably be deleterious. Finally, contrary to the theorists, human ability to predict the response of social systems to such inputs is very limited. According to the Second Law, it is easier to tear down than to build up. Consistent with this, I have happily attempted to tear down the conservatives, radicals, and theorists. Equally consistent, but unhappily so, I am unable to offer any constructive path to social betterment. -Irwin Remson 119 On Almost Being the First Black Psychologist at Yale How do you explain to your mother that grown men are interested in studying rats-not to learn better ways to exterminate them but to study how to make them better learners? Worse yet, how do you break the news to her that her own son was going to work his way through graduate school by training rats. Momma, I'm gonna be a rat-man. (That's what psychologists are called who use rats as the subjects of their investigation of the basic laws of learning.) No, that clearly was not the opener; she wasn't ready for that metamorphosis yet. Momma, I've been invited to work as a research scientist at Yale, and They are going to pay me to go to school there. Che bella America, captured her disbelief at the generosity and democracy of a country which not only would pay her child to become another Einstein, but where a professor from Yale calls long distance and then comes all the way to New York to interview her sonny boy. It could never happen in Sicily, certainly not to a poor boy without proper Mafia connections. 8ut it had happened ju$t like that. I was all set to send off my acceptance letter to Michigan when a psychologist from Yale called to say that he wanted to interview me and was on his way to the big city for that purpose. Pennsylvania Hotel, 10 a.m.-a crewcut, youthful, energetic young Ivy League professor greets me with a firm handshake (which I squeezed back hard to show strength of character). I'm having my martini, dry, twist of lemon. Shall I order the same for you? (at 10 a.m.?) I regretted my forced, nonchalant, Oh, sure, since it was quickly followed by a second martini which unhinged me. Can you build apparatus? Oh, sure. Have you ever run rats? Oh, sure. O.K., then the job's yours. You can be my research assistant. I'll send you my research papers so we can get a fast start when you arrive in New Haven. Oh, sure. Needless to say, I floated home to unbridled rejoicing in the South East Bronx. I had made it! Imagine, Yale. All those sociology courses paid off. Working nights, running days hadn't stopped me. I wasn't one of those fat, little horn-rimmed kids from the Rapid Advance class who read the Times every day from the 7th grade on. No, I read Downbeat and made it. I belonged to the NAACP (then a radical group) rather than the more conventional college clubs one joined simply to have on his school record. I was captain of the track team rather than the chess team. I didn't even play chess, but I still made it! I never understood why Yale waited until the last possible day before responding to my application, especially since my buddy. Bob Weiss, applied the same time I did and was accepted almost a month earlier. And to be sure, I know that even in Beautiful America, big-league professors don't recruit small-time graduate students. But such thoughts vanished as I spread the blue polish on my suede shoes and prepared to become an Ivory Leaguer as they say on the Grand Concourse. By the time I had graduated, five years later, one of my teachers who had left Yale after my first year was amused to see that Mother Yale had Pygmalionized me. Strangely, we met at an International Congress of Psychology in Germany where I was selected (all expenses paid) to give a 15-minute talk-now I had really made it! Laughing together afterwards, he remarked, Weird things always seem to happen to you, don't they? Like when your application to Yale was held up because we thought you were a Negro. What?? Don't tell me no one has told you? You're kidding me. (trans. putting me on ) No, when all the evidence was in, most of the faculty were convinced you were a Negro. That's when the fun started. Apparently, there were those who argued that my letters of recommendation and grades were therefore probably overly generous because of reversed prejudice, and, thus, they had to be discounted. There were those who argued that even if I weren't really as good as the other applicants, it would be nice for The Department to have one (once?). And then, of course, there were those who felt that I didn't belong in Their Department for one reason or another. The debate continued while other students, among them my buddy, were being accepted or rejected. Finally, all 120 of the slots were filled with better applicants, and that almost ended my Ivory League career. But the fickle finger of fate turned up, and one of the acceptances decided to go to another school for a Masters Degree in mathematical psychology before coming to Yale. I then became his alternate, and the professor he was scheduled to work for was the one who had martinied me into becoming a rat man. Incidentally, my unknowing benefactor turned out to be none other than Gordon Bower, who later became my roommate, and is now my colleague at Stanford and best friend (although I don't think he knows this story). But how could they have thought I was a Negro? It was a simple matter of deduction by superior minds. Let me reconstruct the argument for the prosecution. First, your address. Some young faculty members from New York knew that the South East Bronx was filled with Negroes and Puerto Ricans. Second, your courses, major and interests. In 1954, it was rather unusual for a student to have been a sociology major, having taken Race Relations and The Negro in the U.S. and to state he wanted to study the dynamics of prejudice-unless that student were a Negro. Third, you sent copies of research you did on the seating patterns of Negroes in the school cafeteria (as an index of their alienation), as well as papers on prejudice between Negroes and Puerto Ricans and the appeal of political parties to New York's minority groups. Really now, who else but a Negro (and probably a Negro communist) would not only do such things, but have the face to send them to Yale-to Yale still steeped in the Hard Hullian tradition which made soft headed psychologists cringe like frightened caterpillars at the mere mention of that four letter word. Next, you listed on your application under organization, NAACP-you must be Negro. Under interests, jazz (my brother Don is a musician)—you must be Negro. You even said you read Downbeat— again Negro. But still more convincing evidence was lurking in your application—by your own hand writ (handwriting rather than typing the application didn't help either). In bold script under honors and achievements: Captain, varsity track team! (who else but... !) Although your George Bach Economics grades were good (summa), your math scores on the graduate record exam were low, and, of course, we all know, Negroes don't do well on hard subjects like that. In disbelief, I said. But, my name, Zimbardo!? Exactly. Campanella, he replied. Roy Campanella was the pride of the Dodgers at that time, and if Campanella was Negro, as he surely was. then Zimbardo could also be. But my picture, you had to send in a picture stapled to the application. Surely ... Surely, that was the last nail. Suddenly the shock of memory retrieval... my cheap photo with me as a cool cat with a pencil-thin moustache, sporting a Billy Eckstine roll-collar shirt, and a smart plaid vest-all high style on Prospect Avenue in the Bronx, but big in New Haven only in the ghetto. The photo was darker than those of my fellow applicants because being broke (and working my way through school nights as a concession boy at the St. James Theater), I saved money by sending in a comic book coupon and one dollar for 20 chintzy photos to be sent along with my applications to all the schools requiring a picture. So there it is. Even I was convinced. But what would have happened if I had been black when The Man came down to interview me? I'll never know. What I do know is that even though I made it, eventually, the first day I arrived at his rat laboratory in the Institute of Human Relations, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, eager to prove my worth and to push back the frontiers of science, I was handed a mop, and my boss-professor said, After you've mopped up the lab and watered the rats, come upstairs and we'll talk about the research you're going to do. If I didn't have some doubt that my memory could now be selectively distorting the unreality of the past, I would swear the last thing I heard him say was, ... you're going to do, boy. -Philip Zimbardo 121 122 123 research (Above left) Stanford Hospital's fourth heart transplant patient, Robert O. McKee, 51, of Palo Alto rides a bicycle as his main form of exercise. (Above) Dr. Norman Shum way, ably assisted, performs open heart surgery. The Heart has been considered for centuries to be more than just an organ of the body. We regard it as the true center of every individual, a symbol of life itself. Don't people feel peculiar, then, to be walking around with someone else's heart in them? Not at all, says Dr. Norman E. Shumway, who performed America's second heart transplant two years ago. Patients don't even think about it-they're just glad to be alive! Stanford has one of the few medical schools in the world with the equipment and know-how to perform heart transplant$-and be successful. According to Dr. Shumway, the operation itself is not very difficult. What makes the difference is the tissue-matching before and watching the patient very carefully for signs of rejection after. This is where Stanford excells. Although the operation is still very much in the experimental stage (it is not attempted unless there will be certain death otherwise), some transplants have survived over a year now and are doing very well. With time. Dr. Shumway explained, there is an adjustment between heart and host. Rejection is not the threat at six months that it was at two months or two weeks. We are reaching the point of permanent recovery. Drugs control rejection, but also increase the patient's vulnerability to infection. The important thing, says Dr. Shumway, is catching signs of rejection or infection early, and adjusting the patient's medication accordingly. Therefore, he must be monitored constantly to note any change which might signal trouble. To help with this problem, Stanford has acquired a computer which Dr. Eugene Dong is in the process of programming. What about the moral question? There has been much misrepresentation and superstition involved with this so far, but Dr. Shumway believes people are gradually becoming more sophisticated. The only thing important to me is that the people who determine death have to be experts, he says. Even after death has been determined, he will not take the heart without the almost enthusiastic approval of the donor's family. Only once so far has a family refused permission. Dr. Shumway sees no potential problems in deciding which patient gets the donated heart. Two cases are never that similar. Either one needs it more or is a better tissue match. To him, the only moral question would arise in the case of a child. Unfortunately, the drugs that control rejection also stunt growth, so the child with a transplanted heart would be a very special individual-which, he thinks, would have bad psychological effects. The youngest case so far has been a man thirty four years old. Stanford is among the many places working on the development of an artificial heart, which, in the future, might solve completely any problems of morality or rejection. One of the main obstacles is finding a source of power. Radioactive power units are being investigated, but, says Dr. Shumway, we will have cars without gas and refrigerators without electricity before we have artificial hearts. 125 (above) Discussion over dinner during one of the early planning sessions. Housing and Urban Resource Development is the title of Stanford's latest interdisciplinary teaching and research program classified as a SWOPSI Undergraduate Special and listed under numerous other departmental course numbers. Officially it is an evaluation of the urban potential of San Francisco to design solutions for its social, political and environmental problems. Beginning in January, one hundred and sixty students (seventy-five percent graduate, twenty-five percent upperclassmen) from different departments and with different interests joined together with sixteen faculty advisors to form a co ordinated team in hopes of not only defining the critical problems of the city but designing a workable plan for future development. This particular approach may prove to be the most effective means of solving such a large and complex problem. Background information for the study was gathered by three graduate students last summer in Washington from federal urban affairs agencies. In addition, a series of nationally prominent speakers from these government agencies, local authorities, together with business, industrial and community leaders participated to educate and assure that all related viewpoints had been considered. More information came from individuals and industries in the Bay Area. The study was divided into four stages, the first two weeks of which were a brainstorming period during which heterogeneous groups composed of engineers, lawyers, philosophers, architects and others acquainted themselves with the program and the problems likely to be encountered. More fully informed, each student was then able to join one of the ten specialized teams centered around a specific aspect of the study. Alternatives were drawn up stressing areas needing information or research, and by the end of February the majority of data gathering, engineering calculations, architectual design and city organizational structuring had begun. Each group drew up its recommendations, and in early May the decisions on the outstanding alternatives were made. The final analysis and report will be presented in the first week of June with copies distributed to concerned agencies and individuals. The urban study is the eighth in a series of similar interdisciplinary team efforts undertaken at Stanford initiated by the Engineering School. Published reports, closely reviewed, have been instrumental in the development of domestic and foreign planning programs. Perhaps the two most outstanding aspects of the study are its applications to real-world problems and the organization and development of a highly qualified team. To finance research of similar scope by a professional organization would cost as much as two million dollars. Although it proved surprisingly easy to co ordinate the team during the six months, a great deal was learned in the initial sorting of departmental jargons, the high level management training within each specialized group, and finally the vital interaction among all the groups. Academically, this is a different sort of education but one which will provide valuable training for later life. In the future, interdisciplinary programs will continue to branch out into wider and more complex problems. Within the next few years larger national rural problems will be considered. The United Nations has recognized the advantages of such a study in aiding Africa, although emphasis should be placed on our own pressing national problems first. Within the university itself, the study has created interaction among students, faculty, and administration and is also helping to establish a relation between Stanford and the outside world. Finally, one can begin to see a correlation between research and teaching in the University emerging. 126 The American city is breaking down. Deterioration in its social and political institutions, its physical structures, and its transportation systems is eroding its economic base and sapping its vitality. The crisis of the city is rooted in the disparity between the rigid permanence of the city's physical structures and the dynamically changing life style requirements of its inhabitants. 127 (opposite page below) Steve Henriksen, graduate research assistant, monitoring the brain wave recordings of the cat. (opposite right) Peter Dcgan, senior research assistant, operating the gas chromalograph, a machine used to separate and quantify minute amounts of amines, deft) Some of the hundreds of recordings. Sleep, the mechanisms controlling it, and the relation of these mechanisms to mental illness are currently being studies by two laboratories in the Psychiatry Department. Dr. William C. Dement heads a laboratory concerned specifically with the physiological and pharmacological study of sleep while the laboratory of Dr. Jack Barchas is concerned with neurochemistry and behavior. Through their collaboration, a variety of related areas are under investigation. Sleep is not a uniform state but can be divided into two stages: regular slow-wave sleep and rapid eye movement or dream sleep. During slow wave sleep, heart rates and blood pressures fall to their lowest level of the day. In the REM stage of sleep, although the body appears totally relaxed and limp, intense internal activity is going on. Dr. Dement describes REM sleep as completely different from wakefulness on the one hand and from ordinary sleep on the other. REM sleep is present in all mammals and accounts for about twenty percent of total sleeping time. Deprived of REM sleep for a period, animals later make it up to a marked extent, suggesting the importance of REV sleep to the normal rhythm and functioning of the body. It might be added that many drugs deprive man of REM sleep. One aspect under investigation is the role of serotonin in relation to REM sleep. Serotonin is a chemical compound thought to be a possible transmitter at the synapse, a junction between nerve cells in the brain. Although serotonin's relations to sleep mechanisms is still unclear, inhibiting its formation creates a transitory severe insomnia in cats. The administration of the compound parachlorophenyl-alanine (PCPA) successfully inhibits the synthesis of serotonin, and marked changes in sleep and behavior can be seen. In addition to insomnia, cats injected with PCPA show hypersexuality, unusually aggressive behavior, and changes in their perception. Depletion of brain serotonin also results in the appearance of certain physiological changes, normally associated with REM sleep, during wakefulness. After a week of constantly low levels of brain serotonin, PCPA cats are no longer insomniac, but the physiological and psychological disturbances continue. Furthermore, when sleep and REM sleep return, the animals are incapable of making up the lost REM sleep. This finding parallels that of Dr. Dement and Dr. Vincent Zarcone who found that certain acutely ill schizophrenic patients, when deprive of REM sleep, also do not later compensate for it. Dr. Dement suggests that the failure to confine dream activity to REM periods might be the basic abnormality in psychotic states. If serotonin has the same role in the human as it does in the cat, it may be crucial in the normal regulation of sleep; certain forms of mental illness may be due to an imporperly balanced transmitter system. From the various studies of sleep and sleep mechanisms it is hoped that more will be learned about the relationship of biochemistry to certain forms of mental illness and that the results will lead to improved methods of treatment. Until very recently, very little was known even concerning the phenomenon of REM sleep. Remarkable progress has been made despite the difficulties encountered in such research. Through the active investigation of the underlying mechanisms of these phenomena, we will be able to more completely understand the relationship between the brain and behavior. 128 129 Eco-Catastrophe is Dr. Paul Ehrlich's description of what will occur if we allow our present environmental deterioration to continue. Through our ignorance and lack of concern we are slowly destroying the very systems which sustain us. Yet, Dr. Ehrlich argues, environmental destruction is only one element of a rather unpromising future. Food shortages are reaching catastrophic proportions and, along with to a lesser extent, pestilence and war are symptoms of the underlying problem-overpopulation. In connection with this enormous problem. Dr. Ehrlich is studying plant herbivore co-evolution and conducting experimental studies of natural and laboratory populations. Systematic investigations, first set up by John Freedman of Columbia, has been undertaken on crowding in human populations. Dr. Ehrlich's research group in collaboration with Professor Robert North's political science group is currently studying the effects of crowding on intro and inter national conflicts. Behind all the research is the treatment of the population-resource-environment crisis. The population bomb is everybody's baby. Irreparable damage has already been done, and our time is running out. Dr. Ehrlich feels the greatest immediacy is educating mankind and to change existing attitudes towards population control. There are more than three and a half billion inhabitants on earth today. By the year 2000, at our present rate of increase, the world population will be seven hundred billion or twice the number presently. This year alone between ten and twenty million people will die from starvation. It has been predicted that massive famine may occur within the next two decades unless drastic measures are taken to increase food production. Worldwide plague and thermonuclear war, more probable as population growth continues, along with famine make up the trio of potential 'death-rate solutions' to the population problem. Our present technology is not sufficient to solve the problems. Advanced technology and a substantial increase in food production can help alleviate some of the inevitable problems but are not sufficient alone. To be seriously considered is the delicate balance of nature in the environment which can so easily be upset by over-farming, too many chemicals and pesticides. Only in conjunction with a drastic change in population growth will these measures be successful. The United States, as the only world power with a prospect of food surpluses, should take immediate action in two areas. First, it must set an example for the world by establishing a crash programme to limit its own serious 'population explosion.' Then it must establish tough, realistic policies for dealing with the population crisis at the international level. With education, world-wide cooperation and strong action, much can be done to arrest population explosion and restore man's relation to his world. 130 Too many cars, too many factories, too much detergent, too much pesticide, multiplying contrails, inadequate sev age treatment plants, too little water, too much carbon dioxide-all can be traced easily to too many people. -Dr. Paul Ehrlich 131 im Most People react in a polite but skeptical manner when I tell them that my research deals largely with butterflies. However, some of my graduate student and faculty colleagues and I are convinced that butterflies are the best experimental tools for investigating many of the fundamental questions in evolution and ecology. One question of general interest is to what extent population size fluctuations influence the genetic variability of a population. To investigate this we are studying the ecology and genetics of certain butterfly populations on Jasper Ridge, Stanford's biological experimental area. Outcrops of serpentine soil on the ridge act as natural cultural battles. This is because the adult butterflies, for reasons now under study, do not leave the small patch of serpentine upon which they emerge. This allows a level of population experimentation not possible for most other mobile organisms in nature. While the Jasper Ridge studies deal with populations of single species, butterflies are also useful in the theoretical study of multi-specie systems known as community ecology. One of the dilemmas of community ecology is the attempt to explain what factors limit the number of species which a certain habitat can maintain. The most interesting aspect of this question is the problem of high species diversity in the tropics vis a vis the temperate zones. Our studies on butterflies and their food plants in the Stanford tropical greenhouse and in the field in Trinidad and Costa Rica provide insight into those factors and therefore the ecological complexity of a habitat. Along with drastic political change, an understanding of ecological community structures is a prerequisite to solving some of the age-old problems of tropical agriculture. One of the main problems is the importation of many aspects of temperate zone agricultural technology. In the tropics, ants are the major mortality agents of butterfly larvae and other soft bodied insects which feed on plants. Through evolution, many tropical plants have developed nectar glands on their stems and leaves. The nectar attracts predaceous ants which patrol plant leaves in search of insect herbivores. In this way plants, including passionflower and cotton, are able to minimize leaf damage. Around the turn of the century the Kelep ant gained fame in Guatemala for its activities in killing the cotton boll weevil. The introduction of pesticides to Central American cotton crops eliminated the Kelep and undoubtedly many other natural predators. Nevertheless the boll weevil still remains a problem as it quickly evolved resistance to DDT and other insecticides. Studies on butterflies, their food plants and their predators will provide a model system with which tropical countries may plan use of their natural environment for agriculture. The current popularity of ecology is not a fear due to the brilliant advances so much as to the deterioration of our environment. It is tempting to me as an ecologist to devote my total effort to the fight to save what little remains of a once harmonious nature. On the other hand, both the weapons and ammunition of this uprising must be provided by the research efforts (both theoretical and practical) of professional ecologist and biologist. This is why butterflies will continue to occupy at least a part of my attention. -Lawrence Gilbert 132 special programs 133 More Than Half of Stanford's undergraduates take advantage of the opportunity to spend six months at one of the five overseas campuses. Many consider the experience to be one of the most valuable in their Stanford education. The program provides an introduction to the traditions, culture and values of a European country, but more importantly the overseas experience provides an opportunity for the student to establish a world perspective through which he can view his own society. Each campus has its distinctive strengths and potentials as does each group. No two overseas experiences are ever the same, although students generally return with a greater awareness of the world beyond Stanford, the U.S., and themselves. As each successive group returns, the need for various changes becomes evident. After an unsuccessful series of academic orientations last year, the responsibility for this part of the program has been given over to the Overseas Campuses Board, and these sessions are being revamped. Concerning the campuses themselves, several regulations were relaxed during the meeting of the directors last summer. Following the proposals of Germany XXI in particular, students are no longer required to be in residence during the week. It will take time to evaluate the various advantages and disadvantages of the revised program, and the results will probably not be clear until the program has undergone a full year's cycle. 134 135 Austria XIX So you're going to Austria? Is that where they have the kangaroos? After six months in Austria no one saw a kangaroo (except perhaps in the Berliner Zoo), but there were things which made up for that initial disappointment. There was Aida at the Stadts Opera for 28 cents, if you ignore the fact that your legs no longer move after standing that long; semmels for breakfast with black liquid which passed for coffee and hot water with re-usable tea bags; skiing at Kaprun over three-week-break ( the only problem encountered was that we couldn't stop picking up those weird guys ); living in the red light district, except that they don't give student discounts-it's strictly egalitarian. Not that there weren't certain drawbacks: living in a closet for two along with all your furniture; taking your laundry to Piccobello and getting back only half your shirt (your good white shirt, of course); the coal man and his horse drawn cart making 3 A.M. deliveries on Annegasse; women with long hair (on their legs, that is); and most of all, the end...it came too soon. 136 The members of Stanford in Austria Group IX: Keith Agee. Douglas Allen, 8rent Appel, Regan Asher, Steven Bagwell. Donald Chapman. William Cohen, Dave Coles, Steven Christophcrson, Fred Cummins, Dario De Ghetaldi. Debbie De Puy, Paul De Young, Steven Di Mundo, Steven Elliott, Ronald Elving, David Franklin, John Ford, Karstcn Fostvedt, William Ganz, Elizabeth Goddard, Gary Greenfield, Charles Grenier, Mary Hackenbracht, Deborah Harden, Christine Hastorf, Kate Heath, Jared Hess, Richard Highfield, Vance Hodnett, William Hunter, John Kallas, Teresa Keller, Dennis Kent, Bernhard Lahde, John Lammi, Nancy Lee, Dcvony Lchner, Ellen Macke, Steven McGough, Craig Marinovich, Donna Maxwell, Luisa Mellon, John Merrill, Robin Midkiff, Richard Miller, Anthony Moore, Webb Morrow, Ricardo Munoz, Robert Nado. Jennifer Neilson, Emmitt O'Neill, Sara Niccolls, Raymond Parks, Patrick Patterson, William Patterson, Robert Payne, Stewart Rhoads, Margaret Rubin, Joseph Ryan, William Skane, James Slater, William Smart, James Snyder, Janice Stewart, Kathleen Stump, Susan Swarbick, Edward Unkart, Christine Viggers, Robin Wightman, William Winters, Jean Wright. No group picture was submitted. 137 Britain VIII Hey, how was Cliveden? (550 acres of fairyland}... a haunted castle with enchanted forests... the river Thames... sunshine... rose gardens... the notorious Profumo pool... the Japanese Water Garden with lily pads and goldfish... knights in armour... the groveling couch...a red and gold autumn and a white Thanksgiving... ) Oh, it was kinda nice I guess. Well, what was your group like? (Amanda Rutherford The Betty Crocker Cooking Award... Robert's charades... serpentine motion and elephant jokes... Dropmore dollies... Lady Jane's antics... Tom Bristol: The Green Thumb Award... Canary Islands, anyone?... yellow sauce and gooseberries... the Italian job... Ollie's evening seminars... Maidenhead... the French police... no credit at the bar ... Jeff and Jill... Bruce Compton: The Warren G. Harding Presidency Award... M-Day at the Embassy... rooftop missiles... Ann Mellor: The Longest Blouse Award... the Morning Sun and the fan-letter thing... Monte Carlo in the faculty dining room... Doc's tennis matches... Steve Schaller: The Keeper of the Keys Award... the moustache and beard syndrome... What did you say your name is? ...) Oh, I dunno... average I guess. Top to Bottom: Woody Woodbridge, John Bohler, Fred Oakford. Steve Schaller, Jeff Lindell, Jim Coate, Lee Forman, Jim Weaver, Dave Burton, Skip Paul, Ann Richardson, 8ill Beahrs, Dale Sekijima, Rich King, Norm Hantzsche, Karen Kricgcr. Georgia Nystcdt, Barbara Bchling, Jolynn Baily, Steve Fallender, Mike Fraser, Tom Winslow, Oliver Thorold, Rocky Stone, Bruce Compton, Chip Martin, Sam Blackwell, Jeanann Elam. Peter Christenson, Betsy Wigton, Mrs. Levine, Bob Spanner. Kathy Neill, Paul Wesler. Jim Julian] John Granger, Pete Jordan, Jim Jamison, Don Homewood, 8ob Knott, Bob Spiro, Bob Hogeboom, Kathy O'Grady. Lang Atwood, Janet Shaw, Dave Beatty, Sheila Hackett, Dave Lombardi, Leslie Johnson, Greg Bruce, Alicia Levine. Bob Clair. Mike O'Brian. Sally Sehring, Jim Absher, Taffy McNellis, Phil Bobcl, Mary Foucault, Mary Allcndcr, Vic Buffalow, Martha Hummer, Doug Blaney, Leslie Levine, Don Steele. Bob Kasper. Rick Sterns. Duane Linsenbardt, Ann Mallory. 138 139 The members of France XIX: Heather Allen, Rosemary Andre, Ross Bagdasarian, Miranda Barry, William Berlin, Greyson Bryan, Philip Bush, Cynthia Cannady, Sharon Church, Richard Clark, Mary Conley, Robert Cunningham, Thomas Cushing, 8cverly Cutler, Richard Daniels, Claire Darley, Douglas Dashner, David Davenport, Mark Davidson, Robert Dews, Mary Dougherty, Janet Doughty, Charles Douthat, Edward Drummond, Sherry Dyck, Nancy Elliott, Eric Espen, Katherine Evans, Jane Gallagher, Nancy Green, Shari Greenberg, Nancy Guitteau, Richard Gutstadt, John Hanley, Susan Harmcn, Julia Holm, James Howard, Ruth Huey, Robert Huppe, Richard Kauffman, Bonnie Keleher, Walter Koenig, Charles Jones, Douglas Langston, Roberta Levitow, Margaret Lewis, Larry Liebert, Larry Lulofs, Lynne McCallister, Georges McCormick, Leon McKusick, Stephen Matthews. Daniel Mellinkoff, Alex Najjar, Dwight Naylor, Carla O'Dell, Martin Ollstein, Geri Palast, Franklin Perkins, Jeffrey Ptak, Janet Purcell, Maureen Ragan, Lynne Reder, Deborah Satten, Richard Simmermachcr, John Shott, Stephen Staub, Thomas Stichfield, Margaret Stone, Scott Thacher, Judith Thompson, Kim Thorburn, David Weil, Michael Wheeler, Bruce Wilson, Adele Windeguth. No group picture was submitted. 140 France XIX We arrived in France in September with eighty preconceptions some of which were reinforced, some altered, and still others completely abandoned. Whatever our individual reactions were, we all agreed it had been memorable. Though isolated events were often lost in the shuffle, the total experience left an indelible mark-often indescribable. Whether conceived through common fears, a shared sense of adventure, mutual foreign awareness, or simply group withdrawal pains from peanut butter, friendships were as plentiful as Bonjours. A group can be a frighteningly awkward traveling entity often scaring the natives or provoking laughter. For such reasons some individuals chose to abandon the group and travel incognito. Some brought cameras; others trusted their memories. For all of the individual idiosyncracies, there was one unifying characteristic: the obsession for travel. Suddenly those who weren't sure about venturing to San Francisco for a day were taking off to Paris for the evening—or to Turkey for the weekend. And so the race for culture continued for one hundred and eighty days and nights with brief interruptions for classes. Though there was a constant flow of conversation (often an overflow), and a wealth of ideas and theories, in the end the silent remembrances are the only valid representations of France XIX. 141 Kneeling: Dana Headapol, Peter Duffy, Julie Frantz, Gayle Erickson, Don Kcwman, Ginny Holmos, Brian Fry, Scott Putnam, Geoff Chapman, Phil Koblik, Mary Ellen James, Kathy Peterson, George Schmitten, Fred Morck, Jim Hall, Alison VVenke, Heather Ball; Standing (I. to r.) Herr Schmid, Fraulein Kappus, Frau von Radecki. Fraulein Frisch, Kathy Burkett, Meg Spencer, Carol Fagan, Mike Merchant, Jan Giske, Peter Connell, Jane Binger. Frau Dr. Baton, Nancy Barry, Brian Stubbs, Jim Depp, Forest Frank. Frau Dr. Lypp, Mac Claflin, Dave Lancy. Barbara Eick, Dcbby Ledford, Jim Massey, Don Cedar, Angus Fulton, Doug McDonald, Glen Huntsbcrger. Mike Saenz, Linda Barnett, Janie Narkcwicz, Ken Heinz, Bruce Hinton, Margie Hasse, John Kottkc, Carol Jossop, Rocky Deal, Mark Rooney; Top: Juliet Foulkes, Tim Gillespie, Ron Marian, Melinda Broyles, Jeff Stalder, Immogene Foulkes, Ray Baxter, Kathy Heinen, Kem Cook, Jim Forthoffer, Ted Kaehler, Mark Brown, Peter Olson, Skip Stiver, Pat Brennan, Rich Wilson, Chris Rasmussen, Gary Greenberg, Caroline Cox, Peter Pcndclton. 142 Germany XXIII Stanford in Germany twenty three seven oh five six Landgut Burg empty words (at least without something like this: brain atrophy, sunsets from the bench at Laney's Leap, Putnam's curve. Wily and the bell, the great pass-fail conspiracy, mail boxes and Permission for Women to Travel Alone forms. Burg Krankheit Eurrail passes with and without passports, drunk in the Rats with Abbey Road and too many Surreal Pillows, kuchen and the 4:10 run, pong. The Naked Lunch, the woods, toilet paper snow, capture the flag, the possibility of an academic program, American fussball. Dr. Brewster singing Summertime, the big green busses, volleyball, Stephan and Nora, mad dog Niki, The Stuttgart Hauptbahnhof, whose responsibility?, Technik der Korperlichen Liebe, 3 plus X week break, Frau Schubert and the Greek maids, popcorn and apple cider, Immogene and Juliet, Halloween, the vineyard's rows of green and golden brown, Gruss Gott, Berlin, the girls fulfilling our needs one morning, snowball warfare, waiting for the Draft numbers, rapping and rapping and crying, the Puppet play, Larry's movie, the Familienfest, and saying good-bye in the snow. So, was passiert hier?) Our Institutions, Our Lives, Us. You See, It Wasn't Very Academic, But We Learned A Lot; It Was Hard to Leave, Damned Hard. 143 144 Italy XIX Di te amore m'attrista mia terra, se oscuri prof umi perde la sera d'aranci, o d'oleandri, sereno, cammina con rose il torrente che quasi n'e tocca la foce. Ma se torno a tue rive e dolce voce al canto chiama da strada timorosa no so se infanzia o amore desio d'attri cieli mi volge e mi nascondo nelle perdute cose. Love of you saddens me, my earth, if evening sheds dark perfumes of Orange trees, or oleanders, if-serene-the torrent flows with roses that almost reach its estuary. But if I return to your shores and, in song, a soft voice calls, fearful, from the road-I Know not whether childhood or love, longing for other skies turns me, and I hide in the forgotten thing. Benjamin Alterman, Jennifer Anderson, William Anderson, Diane Barnes, Mark Beck, Barbara Berti, Terry Binkley. Thomas Borowicz, Marion Brewer, Betsy Burns. Jeffrey Burton, Joel Butler. Virginia Butts. Linda Chapin, Frances Clarke, Bruce Cohen, Christopher Cooke, Barbara Cox. John Danilovich, Karen Davidson, Barbara Davis, Charles De Sieves, Cary Diet or, Daniel Di Vittorio, Debra Doepel, Burton Edwards, Don Ernst, Michele Fallon, Michael Frank, Lawrence Gamble, Raul Gasteazoro, Tyley Girard, Christine G on dak, Brian Gough, Joseph Guzzetta, Jane Harrison, Janet Healy, Dana Hendricks, Prather Hill, Kathleen Horan. Jamie Horsley, Jennifer Jasaitis, Leslie Jones, Harold Justman, Mark Justman, Sally Keeran, Christopher Kirkpatrick. Tom Lallas. Michael Lapsys. Mary Laverty. Ann Lcedy. Susan Lowell, Helen MacPherson. Nicholas Marinaro. Eduardo Mejia, Richard Menees, Joan Meyer, Constance Miller. Peter Moehrke, Gordon Nelson, Steven Nissen, Carol Ockman, Lisa Peck. George Piggot. Frank Pope, Trudy Richter, Constance Roos, Kathleen Rowland, Melanie Rowland, George Sabato, Peggy Schcinman, Barton Sheela. Diane Shepherd, Allen Sibley, John Stivelman, Stephen Strick, Carol Sundquist. Richard Tucker, Christopher Walt, Greg Washington, Harry White. Kirstie Wilde, Peter Winslow, Linda Winthrop, Lawrence Young, Mary Ylitalo. 145 Conducted Jointly by Stanford language departments and the Overseas Campuses Office, three specialized programs are offered to qualified juniors, seniors and graduate students proficient in a foreign tongue. Each year a small group of fifteen students is able to attend a national university in Spain, France, or Germany for six months as regular students. While many of those attending have already participated in the larger overseas programs, it is not a requirement, nor is it necessary to be a language major. This year, accompanied by Professor Gustavo Alfaro, the third group of Spanish and Latin American Studies majors spent six months at the University of Salamanca. All courses were taken in Spanish from University professors, and the students lived in a University approved Colegio Mayor. The ancient city, one hundred and seventy miles north-west of Madrid, has been a center of education for seven centuries. The University, founded in 1230, is the oldest on the peninsula. Now in its second year at the University of Orle'ans-Tours, a similar French program accepted fifteen juniors and seniors to the Faculte des Lettres et Sciences Humaines for fall and winter quarters. The group lived among French students in Cite' Universitaires and completed all reading, papers, examinations, and oral work in French. Professor Ralph Hester directed the program as an adviser while offering courses himself. Hamburg University accepts a small number of both graduate and undergraduate students to study German language, literature, and history from late March to September. Miss Luise Schipporeit, resident lecturer and administrator, and resident Professor Kurt Mueller-Vollmer and supervising the rigorous academic program, co-ordinating University courses with additional Stanford courses. Housing is provided in Hamburg student dormitories or in private rooms. 146 far. 147 Hopkins Marine Station stretching for a mile down the Monterey Peninsula in Pacific Grove, is open all year long for the study of biology both along the shoreline and on the open sea. Rich in a tremendous variety of marine life, the surrounding waters provide excellent resources for research and teaching. The station provides facilities for graduate students in biology and visiting investigators. In addition to the year round operations, advanced courses concerning various aspects of marine biology are offered to qualified undergraduates from Stanford and other schools during the spring quarter. Designed primarily to give students an opportunity to engage in research, instruction lasts for three weeks followed by independent work. Involved politically as well as scientifically, last year students and staff centered their attention on DDT and its effects on marine systems. Results of the study, drawn up by the staff in a statement to Governor Reagan, were instrumental in the curtailment of the chemical. This year emphasis was placed on regional problems of sewage and water pollution. 148 150 151 152 VOLUNTARY ASSU by Roger Reed Roger Reed is a senior majoring in political science. He is a member of the Political Union Board and a staff writer for the ARENA. An outcry burst forth this year over mandatory membership in the Associated Students of Stanford University (ASSU). According to ASSU documents, all Stanford students are members of the ASSU. It therefore claims to be the sole representative of the student body. However, few students choose to support the ASSU; less than a third of the students even voted in the ASSU elections last fall. The ASSU is a club, not a government. In spite of this, the ASSU claims quasi-governmental authority including the power to tax. Due mostly to a hidden fee in each student's quarterly tuition, the ASSU commanded well over $130 thousand this year. The amount was divided up by the ASSU Senate among a few of the student organizations and interest groups on campus. Another regulation imposed by the ASSU requires that all campus organizations deposit their money with the Student Organizations Fund, a bank operating out of the ASSU office. The ASSU Financial Manager, working under the ASSU Senate, is responsible for running the bank. The ASSU's claim to extensive control over student affairs has caused a great deal of resentment. Compulsory membership in any association violates the very essence of liberty. Men should be free to choose their own destiny, to join or not join any group. The United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights prescribes: Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association ... No one may be compelled to belong to an association. In addition to denying students an essential freedom, the ASSU has made more than one attempt this year at political repression. The ASSU threatened to cut off funds to the Political Union Board, which had offended ASSU officials by including popular conservatives in its program of speakers. Although the Poli U budget was eventually passed over considerable opposition, the ASSU threatened to instigate a law suit and looked into the possibility of judicial proceedings. Later the ASSU tried to intimidate THE ARENA in its investigation of ASSU finances. Although several ASSU officials clamored to ban the conservative newspaper, the ASSU had to change its own by laws when THE ARENA refused to obey them. In fairness it is conceded that the ASSU finances some worthwhile projects. However, most of the activities can be handled better elsewhere. The Athletic Department is a much more likely source of revenue for the pom-pon girls, the Axe Com and the Cardinals Board. The educational activities of the Political Union and the Speech Association would logically be a financial responsibility of the University. THE STANFORD DAILY should have to support its editorial activities through advertisements and private contributions like some of the other student newspapers. And despite today's sacrosanct status of the Black Students Union and MECHA, there is doubt whether student money should be given to groups that engage in political activity. Who really benefits from the ASSU? Far from providing unique services for its members, the ASSU is primarily a tool for furthering the power of the individuals and groups who run it. High salaries are paid to some functionaries, and two campus organizations walked away each with over $10,000 in student money this year. Over $56 thousand was appropriated to the ASSU Executive, Office and Senate, including $40 thousand to pay secretaries and cover office expenses. The vast majority of Stanford students are not interested in setting up some group of campus politicos to speak for them. They would rather speak for themselves. Undoubtedly, University officials enjoy the convenience of having only to make a phone call to the proper ASSU potentate to be able to say that students had been consulted. But statements handed down by the ASSU Council of Presidents and resolutions passed by the ASSU Senate do not convey what the rest of the students think. The only way to begin to get real representation of students at Stanford is to encourage the faculty and administration to stop depending on the ASSU elite and start talking to students in the classrooms, the dormitories and the cafeterias. For years the ASSU has entertained us with its power plays. But $130 thousand is too much to pay for a few laughs. The time has come to stop financing political power trips and to stop lending credibility to an authoritarian system that unjustly demands that we pledge allegiance to it. The rights of individual students will be asserted only when we dismember the ASSU colossus and literally give the power back to the people. 153 THE ROGER REED AFFAIR by Harvey Hukari Harvey H. Hukari, Jr. is a graduate student in communications. He is editor of the ARENA, and is one of the leaders of the Free Campus Movement. It is difficult for anyone to look back on the issues and events surrounding Roger Reed's battles with our newly formed Student Senate without feeling some twinge of sympathy akin to that one feels for the lone individual caught up in the politicized machinations of any governmental bureaucracy. As the head of the Political Union, an adjunct of the ASSU, Mr. Reed had been entrusted with the responsibility of booking a variety of political figures for appearances on the Stanford campus. His Fall Quarter symposium, America on the Threshold of the Seventies, featured San Francisco's Mayor Joseph Alioto, California's Lt. Governor Ed Reinecke, conservative philosopher Dr. Russell Kirk, Senator Barry Goldwater, Congressman John Tunney and Harrison Salisbury of the NEW YORK TIMES. In terms of both attendance and the quality of the speakers, the Poli U symposium was an unqualified success. In addition, Mr. Reed was able to top off the quarter by presenting William F. Buckley, Jr. to an overflow crowd of students in Memorial Auditorium. Quite rightfully, Mr. Reed could look back on the Political Union's Fall program with a sense of pride and accomplishment. Unfortunately, the ASSU Senate didn't see it the same way. Plagued by delays and political in fighting with the University administration and among its own members, the Senate had been unable to finish approving the ASSU budget for the 69-70 fiscal year until the first part of the Winter Quarter. Under normal circumstances, the budget deliberations should have been finished last Spring. When the Political Union Board's budget came up for approval in January, those members of the Senate whose political and social views differed greatly from those of Mr. Reed's seized upon the opportunity to make matters uncomfortable for him. It had been discovered that in scheduling speakers, Mr. Reed had neglected to adhere to one provision of the By-Laws of the ASSU Constitution which requires that the Student Financial Manager authorize all contracts. This would probably have been excused except for the fact that Senator Goldwater's booking agency, Harry Walker, Inc., had been demanding payment since the previous quarter. The Senate, given its political complection, was reluctant to appropriate the necessary funds to pay for the debts which Mr. Reed had incurred in putting together the Poli U's programs and was enthusiastic about shifting the burden of payment onto Mr. Reed's back. As the president of the Stanford Young Republicans and a staff writer for THE ARENA, Mr. Reed had built up a reputation as being an active conservative. It became evident in the Senate's deliberations over the state of the Poli U's budget that being associated with such unfashionable minority groups as The Free Campus Movement and the Young Republicans was clearly not to Mr. Reed's advantage. Nor was the fact that he had been able to bring some of the nation's most prominent conservative spokesmen to the Stanford campus within the space of some three months. The Senate did not enjoy the spectacle of Mem Aud packed to overflowing for such men as Goldwater and Buckley, nor did it relish the memory of Mr. Reed's critical articles on the Senate in THE ARENA, one of which precipitated a public debate in Cubberley Auditorium between members of the Black Student Union and THE ARENA staff. Surprisingly, it was the BSU faction which produced the necessary votes to approve some $5,000 for the Poli U to pay the speakers which it had sponsored. After subjecting Mr. Reed to blistering criticism, the black senators deserted the radicals who were intent on crucifying him and backed a compromise measure which would pay off the Poli U debt, order the Stanford Judicial Council to investigate the case, make Reed responsible for raising the funds to pay Buckley's honorarium and, as a fitting final touch, censure him. While pleased that the Senate had not avoided the practical necessity of paying the ASSU debts, Mr. Reed and his supporters were angered by what they felt was an unjust and unnecessary persecution of an individual whose work had been of great benefit to the university community. Although some conservatives acknowledged that being 154 censured by the ASSU Senate was equivalent to being criticized by PRAVDA, they charged that Mr. Reed was being punished not for his violation of a By-Law provision but for his political beliefs and that his character and integrity were being unfairly maligned. They cited the fact that during the previous Spring Quarter, Mr. Reed had signed contracts without the Student Financial Manager's authorization for two liberal speakers, Carl T. Rowan and Henry Steele Commager, and no one objected. The Roger Reed affair did not end with the Senate's action. In the two issues of THE ARENA which followed Reed's censure, front page articles charged that there were a number of irregularities in the financial operations of the Student Financial Manager's office, some voluntary student groups which banked with the Student Organization Fund and the ASSU itself. The articles suggested that if Roger Reed were to be chastized for his sins, that others might well deserve to be punished for their financial peccadillos too. The Senate's reaction to THE ARENA charges was a feeble attempt to intimidate any further muckraking by calling for an investigation of the paper by the ASSU Publications Board. At the Pub Board meeting later, it was decided that ASSU regulations that would effect THE ARENA were irrelevant and ought to be abolished anyway. At the following session of the Senate, the body voted to investigate the charges made by the paper and determine their validity. For many students, the Roger Reed controversy brought into focus some of the problems associated with student government and its financing. Liberals cried for law and order when the error of the conservative Mr. Reed was exposed and the radicals shrieked for justice. Nothing the attacks on Reed and THE ARENA, conservatives grumbled about the manner in which the structure of ASSU was being used as an instrument of intimidation and political repression against them. For some, the censure of Mr. Reed strengthened their convictions that student government was a farce anyway and ought to be abolished while others ignored the matter altogether and probably were the wiser for it. 155 RIPPING OFF $5000 The following article reflects a different point of view on the Roger Reed Affair than that presented by Mr. Hukari. The authors have chosen to remain anonymous for the following reason: “After watching Stanford over a number of years we have seen too many people's ideas either applauded or condemned based upon WHO was the source instead of WHAT was said. Thus we are asking that you try like we are trying to focus on the issues and meaning instead of the status or position of the speaker. If you would like to discuss these ideas and the ones below, try talking to the person next to you. If you are desperate, however, we can be reached in care of the QUAD editor. The accusations against Roger Reed were based on moral, political, and legal grounds. Since the prosecution of Reed by the Stanford Judicial Council is already underway at the time this goes to press, the circulation of the following informational points obtained mostly from public records should not hurt whatever defense he has. Upon returning from an Overseas Campus at the beginning of Spring quarter, 1969, Mr. Reed was able to acquire a position on the Political Union Board, apparently without the legally REQUIRED approval of the Legislature of the ASSU. Article VI, section 6 of the ASSU By-Laws requires legislative approval of appointments to the Political Union. Subsequently, Mr. Reed signed several contracts to bring various speakers to campus during the following academic year. In so doing, he committed funds which were not at his disposal, in that no budget for the Political Union Board had been approved by the Legislature. These contracts included, among others, one signed on May 28, 1969 with the Harry Walker Agency for the services of Barry Goldwater, in return for the sum of $2,120. During the summer of 1969, the financial director of the Association (Dean of Students Peter Bulkeley) administratively allocated an emergency appropriation to the Political Union Board of $1,510 to be used during Fall quarter, 1969, until the Senate of the Association had the opportunity to act upon the budget. Then during Fall quarter, the following speakers appeared at Stanford, allegedly under the auspices of the Political Union: William Buckley, Jr., Barry Goldwater, Harrison Salisbury, John Tunney, Joseph Alioto, Russell Kirk. (Note: one of the moral questions that he is not charged with is bringing such a diverse group of men who represent all parts of the political spectrum.) Also during Fall quarter, office and publicity expenses were incurred (including a bill for leaflets of $170.40), and Mr. Kirk was paid $800 from the emergency appropriation. As it is an election year, Mr. Alioto and Mr. Tunney appeared without charge. Apparently, Mr. Buckley was to be paid by donations solicited by Mr. Reed from some undisclosed private source to the tune of $2,000; however, no one in a position of trust and responsibility (i.e., administrators) would say that approval from the General Secretary's Office for this solicitation of funds had been asked for, much less granted, as required by University regulations. No donations designated for the expenses of Mr. Buckley 156 were deposited in the account of the Political Union Board with the ASSU, as required by the Handbook for Student Organizations. In the event that this money was not deposited in the Political Union account because the Political Union did not officially sponsor Mr. Buckley's appearance, then the auditorium in which Mr. Buckley appeared MAY have been reserved under falso pretenses. Also admission was charged for non-students attending Mr. Goldwater's speech, but this money was NOT deposited with the ASSU, again in violation of the Handbook for Student Organizations. And then several weeks following the appearance of Mr. Goldwater and Mr. Salisbury, bills were presented to the Student Financial Manager demanding payment of fees for these speakers ($2,120 for Mr. Goldwater, $1,500 for Mr. Salisbury) IN EXCESS of the emergency appropriation. At that time, the Student Financial Manager refused to make payment, in that the original contracts for the services of Messrs. Goldwater and Salisbury HAD NOT BEEN APPROVED BY OR SIGNED by the Student Financial Manager, AS REQUIRED. But it should be noted that Mr. Reed, in registering with the ASSU as representative of the Political Union Board, signed a statement indicating that he had read and understood the regulation of the Association, including the Handbook for Student Organizations. After investigating and discussing the above facts, the Senate of the Association censure Roger Reed for having obligated the Association for those expenses on January 29, 1970. The Senate also referred the case to the Stanford Judicial Council. And strangely enough in light of the charges against Reed, the Senate voted to allocate $5,118.85 of student body funds to pay for debts accumulated since the time that Mr. Reed began signing the unauthorized contracts. Why the Senate voted this way shall be discussed below. The grounds for recommending SJC action were the following: Mr. Reed allegedly willfully and negligently ignored the conditions set forth in the ASSU Constitution, By-Laws and Handbook for Student Organizations by entering into contractual agreements in an attempt to obligate the ASSU for expenditures not previously approved. Why did the Senate vote to effectively GIVE Mr. Reed $5,000 so he could pay what were perceived by many to be his personal debts? To answer this question we need to examine the voting, and more specifically the voting of the white conservatives and reactionaries and also of the Black Student Union. First, however, it is necessary to consider earlier contact between the BSU and Reed and Hukari. They had been on the same platform before. On November 18, 1969, Dave Edwards (Senate Chairman) and Leo Bazile (BSU Co-chairman) invited Hukari and Reed to a debate in Cubberly Auditorium to discuss accusations made by Reed in the ARENA against the Senate, the BSU, and “power politics. The antagonisms were not resolved at that time, especially when Reed admitted two things. First, that even though he had been attacking the Senate procedures, he had never been to ONE Senate meeting. Second, in response to a question which implied that he was overtly racist, Reed admitted that yes, his family did own sort of a plantation, or at least some land which has share-croppers on it. Now what then would make the BSU vote with the conservatives and reactionaries to give money to bail out Reed? It probably was not personal love that did the trick, unless the heated exchanges that went on at the Senate between Reed and Edwards were just for show. Considering also that the BSU leaders said that they knew that if the tables had been turned, Hukari, Reed and other conservatives would do everything they could to crucify the BSU, what explanation can be offered for the BSU obeying the conservative reactionary block? The conservatives must have had some leverage to be able to manipulate the leadership and votes of the BSU. It is curious too that Hukari and Reed engaged in doing what they had condemned just a few weeks before: power politics. Thus it might be that the leverage was rather straightforward. For example, suppose the threat was that, if the BSU did not vote to pay for Reed's contracts, then the conservatives and reactionaries would block the sizeable BSU budget which was also under consideration. In that case, the BSU was trapped; either they were forced by Reed, Hukari and friends or they were bought off. Another figure whose actions were notable in this case was Pat Shea, a member of the Council of Presidents of the ASSU. Shea, wheeler-dealer to the end, seemed not to be following any of the legal niceties that he usually hides behind. Shea was blatant. He implied that even if Reed had violated all those rules and regulations, the ASSU should be nice guys and pick up the $5,118.85 bill for unauthorized contracts signed by Mr. Reed. So that is how Mr. Roger Reed managed to manipulate the situation until he got charged with violating a file-folder full of regulations, but he used the students' money in the process. 157 THE FITNESS TO SERVE by Roman Buhler Roman Buhler is a junior history major and a member of last year's student legislature. He is a current member of Young Republicans. The recent veto by President Pitzer of a certain Yale Braunstein's appointment to the Student-Trustee Finance Committee has brought into focus important questions on the nature of student involvement in University governance. It is now accepted by virtually all at Stanford that students ought to have some voice in the planning and administration of activities at a university. While small amounts of power have been vested in an independent student government, I believe that the long range trend is towards the admission of voting students in gradually increasing numbers to working faculty-administration-trustee committees. Eventually, I believe that students will be allowed to serve as voting members on the Board of Trustees. It is difficult to predict exactly how long this trend will take to mature or how far it will eventually go. Will universities, for example, ever be actually run by students? I think there is a distinct possibility of this occurring in isolated instances, but I doubt that it will become a general pattern. Most students still see their university experience as a time for intellectual development, not for practice in institutional administration. It is for this reason that I believe that the future of student participation in University affairs lies in joint student-staff committees where students may express and support their views without bearing the ultimate responsibility for administering the institution. It is unfortunate that more students are not involved in the University committee structure and that THE DAILY and THE ARENA do not pay more attention to this aspect of University affairs. Applicants to major committees seem to come disproportionately from a small group of 50 to 100 students, many of whom are graduate students, cut off in some significant ways from the campus community. Hopefully, as people realize the importance of these committees as a catalyst for student involvement in governance, interest and participation will grow. It is this potential of the committee system that gives the issues raised by the Braunstein affair more than a passing interest. Mr. Braunstein is, in my opinion, one of the more talented students of radical persuasion on the Stanford campus. I disagree with most of his views and political goals, but as a member of last year's Student Legislature, I must marvel at the technically superb manipulation of a hostile and unruly assembly that Mr. Braunstein managed while Speaker of that body. This year as a recognized student authority on University finances, he applied for a newly created student position on the Trustee Finance Committee. His application was considered, as are all such applications, by the Student Senate Committee on Nominations. The committee considered the possibility that the selection of such an outspoken radical as one of the first student representatives to the Board of Trustees could set the stage for bitter student-trustee antagonism and imperil the entire future of student-trustee cooperation. Despite this factor, the committee decided that Braunstein's outstanding expertise in University finances made him the best available student for the position. What the committee had not known was the fact that Mr. Braunstein was on probation with the University for an offense that has not been made public. President Pitzer's refusal to accept Mr. Braunstein's nomination because of his probationary status touched off the whole campus debate. There are several important questions raised by the nomination and subsequent veto. Obviously the most important one is whether or not Braunstein should have served on the committee in spite of Pitzer's veto. To what extent was Pitzer's veto related to his probationary status? What kind of precedent does the whole affair set for future relations between students and administration? Had I been on the Committee on Nominations or in the Student Senate, I would have voted against Mr. Braunstein's selection. Primarily this would have been a political decision for I do not feel that Braunstein's views would be likely to encourage constructive dialogue between students and trustees. I respect Mr. Braunstein's opinions, but I believe that they are so hostile to the established order through which the committee must work that they might sabotage any committee efforts at reform. I believe that his political views, which would unavoidably color his actions as a student representative, are not shared by the major portion of the student body. Once Mr. Braunstein had been selected, however, I normally would have opposed the unconditional veto made by President Pitzer. If students are to be truly 158 represented in the University, their representatives must not be subject to rejection by the administration. What has turned me against Mr. Braunstein is his refusal to say publicly, or even privately to the Student Senate or Committee on Nominations exactly what it is that has caused him to be placed on probation. How can students place their confidence in a representative who refuses to place his confidence in them? To the possibility that Mr. Braunstein's confession might lead to legal prosecution, I answer that if he really wishes to represent the student body, he must be willing to give students the information on which to judge his fitness for that position. How can I evaluate and perhaps disagree with Pitzer's position when the other side refuses to release the information on which that decision was based. I will admit that just like many of the Senators who recently voted against the confirmation of Clement Haynsworth as a Supreme Court Justice, I am not especially unhappy that a conflict of interest has appeared, providing a good excuse to oppose a nominee, who for other reasons I would rather not see confirmed. Nevertheless, had the probation aspect not existed or had Mr. Braunstein released the information regarding the reasons for his probation in time for them to be considered by the Committee on Nominations and the Senate, I would have accepted the decision of these bodies, which, however biased, were chosen constitutionally by all the students who cared to vote. I do feel that the Senate's final action in withdrawing Braunstein's nomination and in approving another (and incidentally a much more moderate) appointee was both an expedient decision, in that it avoided a needless student-trustee confrontation, and a correct one in view of Mr. Braunstein's refusal to give the Senate the information to evaluate Pitzer's decision. Should, however, some future nominee be rejected for the same reasons by the administration, and should the reasons for that nominee's probation not in my opinion impair his fitness to serve, I would vote for his reconfirmation and support student government actions to ensure that the representatives chosen by students would actually serve. 159 160 LAND AND GRASS ROOTS_________________________________ by Paul Rupert Paul Rupert is a former Stanford student. He is a member of the Resistance and of the Grass Roots Movement. Grass Roots was formed in response to the destructive and irresponsible uses of the land in the Palo Alto-Stanford area. We recognize that the way decisions are made about the use of land and resources is a critical problem in all societies. Our concern is that land use has never been democratically determined. We think it should be. Because Stanford University owns 8000 acres of land, and has developed several thousand of those, we are conscious of the impact of a major landowner on the surrounding area. The fact that Stanford intends to lease hundreds of acres for further commercial and industrial development gives us an opportunity to see that we have a significant voice in determining how this land shall be used. Our objection to the use of property by most landowners is that the criterion for development is maximum gain for the owner. The social impact of one kind of development or another is often not even considered. Thus we find that Stanford has leased its land to the kind of war-based industry that many of us find objectionable; but Stanford applies no social criteria to leases. By massive industrial development, the University has contributed to the ecological crisis in the Mid-Peninsula; again, the impact of a given industry on the ecology is not thoroughly evaluated. In failing to provide housing for its own students in a high-priced area and in offering no land for low-income housing to the thousands of its own employees and the workers on its lands, the University has had a tremendous impact on the low-income housing market of the area; no remedy has been offered. People in Grass Roots recognize that a change must come. We also realize that the University will not make the necessary changes in its leasing policies without strong pressure from employees and students. Thus we are involved in an education and action campaign designed to focus attention on specific projects and the general problem of Stanford's land use. Thus far we have concentrated on two ongoing developments—Dillingham's Palo Alto Square Project and Coyote Hill—and on the need for low-income housing. Our hope is to stop the first two through education and whatever direct action might be necessary. We hope to secure land for housing by pushing the University to follow at least the maximum housing recommendations of its newly-formed housing committee. It would be nice if Stanford distinguished itself from other corporations by its social conscience. But the University must survive in a system where education is seen as an investment by private corporations and the government. These major contributors have their own priorities, and they do not insist that Stanford be terribly concerned about the welfare of this area. Stanford turns to its lands as a way to generate money which is not tied to certain uses. While we recognize that Stanford's lands are a source of income, we insist that it not be just another developer. Our hope is that we can rally enough people behind a program for the reasonable control and uses of the land to implement that program. 161 162 A.S.S.U. The Associated Students of Stanford University has been in a state of rapid change for the past several years-Students are accepting more readily their responsibility in the direction of the University's concerns. In trying to make the Association a more creditable and substantive organization, several innovations have been put into effect this year. A new constitution proposed by 1968-69 ASSU President Denis Hayes and adopted last spring, provided for the creation of a 40-member Student Senate to replace the 140-member Legislature. The supporters of the new constitution hoped that the legislative arm of the Association would be able to work with less division by factionalism and political pressure groups. For the first time, a Council of Presidents rather than a single executive is leading the ASSU. Each President has a certain area of special concern, and devotes the greater part of his or her efforts to this area: for example, graduate studies and housing needs, liaison between various parts of the community and ASSU, managing the executive functions of the office, and working with various University committees. The Associated Students is in the process of becoming more and more financially independent of the University, and in so doing, is having to face more directly the problem that concerns every part of the Stanford community now-coping with income limitations and rising financial needs. A special referendum Spring Quarter will ask students to voice their opinions on the amount of student fees for ASSU. and a movement is also underway to make the ASSU a voluntary organization. In an interview with the Stanford Daily, Barry Askinas, a member of the Council of Presidents, stated, The student government has many functions, and only one of these is the political function. There are also executive, representative, organizational and innovative duties. In trying to serve the needs of the students who elected them, the Council of Presidents has been instrumental in the enactment of several new programs and changes. SWOPS I (Stanford Workshops on Political and Social Issues), a student-organized and directed effort to involve Stanford in curriculum changes designed to seek solutions to urgent social and political problems, began this fall with several seminar-type workshops offered for academic credit in the Undergraduate Specials division. It is an attempt to utilize some of the University's resources in terms of personnel, talent, and facilities for a constructive approach to the many problems that are confronting our society. Largely as a result of the Council's efforts, a Student Center for Innovation and Research in Education has been set up and has received the unanimous acceptance of the faculty Senate. The Center will serve as a means for helping students devise new ways of approaching educational interests—for example, through student-initiated courses, directed reading, and special research-and of coordinating faculty and students with similar interests. The Presidents: Barry Askinas, John Grube, Joyce Kobayashi, and Patrick Shea, spend time on projects that range from residence planning committees to being ex officio members of many University advisory groups, to representing Stanford to student leaders from many different colleges and universities. Their efforts largely revolve around the theory that student government does have many functions, and that its primary task is finding the most effective means of representing the ideas of the members of their constituency in a responsible, responsive way. 163 David Edwards, ASSU Senate Chairman 164 The Senate The Student Senate is perhaps the branch of the Association most plagued by criticisms of its credibility and cognizance of responsibility. Most students are slow to forget that LASSU ended its term last year with a record of parliamentary game-playing, sketchy attendance, and a consequent unfinished budget. The new Senators were elected and seated to the announcement that the Association was currently operating on an emergency interim budget. That announcement was followed by another stating the urgency of the appointment of a Committee on Nominations to recommend student members for the Stanford Judicial Council, University, Trustee, and ASSU committees. The Senate's action on the budget began in December after the Finance Committee had completed its deliberations on the budget and had formulated its recommendations. Two large appropriations, one to the Black Student's Union for $11,500 and the other to MECHA for $10,184.50, caused the Senate to use some of the ASSU Reserves Fund, an account that also provides some of the income for the budget. These appropriations forced the Senate to cut drastically the budgets of many other organizations dependent on the Association for financial support. Senate nominations were the subject of a controversy in the middle of the year-the Senate's nomination of Yale Braunstein for a post on the Trustee Finance Committee being rejected by President Pitzer. Pitzer had vetoed the nomination because Braunstein was on probation, the terms of which prohibit him from holding positions on committees appointed by the President or other officials of the University. The Senate, after the President's action, supported a resolution that reaffirmed its belief that the ASSU Constitution guarantees any registered student the right to apply for nomination by the ASSU Nominations Committee. President Pitzer stated again that he could not accept Braunstein's nomination; that he was prevented from so doing by his responsibility to maintain the integrity of the Legislative and Judicial Charter, which required him to uphold the terms of Yale's probation. The Senate withdrew all of its nominations for posts on Trustee committees. The next step remained unclear. However, a continuing question of the authority of the ASSU Constitution in relation to the Stanford Legislative and Judicial Charter emerged, to what eventual result no one knew. 165 Right: David Swift, Student Financial Manager; Below: Cory Herrera and Bob Allen, Assistant Student Financial Managers One of the basic criticisms of the mandatory nature of membership in the Association was based on the requirements for financial procedures, with the Students' Organizations Fund being a prime target. Many organizations questioned the necessity of depositing their funds with the SOF, citing an overabundance of red tape and loss of time and independence. Clubs, especially residence groups, voiced a desire to handle their own budgets independently, saying they could handle their accounts with less complication and more freedom if they were not required to register with the SOF. The Student Financial Manager's office, often viewed as a monolith of bureaucratic power, is charged with not only the administration of the $147,100 ASSU budget, but also with the handling the Students' Organizations Fund's annual cash flow of approximately $4 million. The Financial Manager also oversees special projects such as arrangements for programs, the Student Police, the Sunday Movies, the Boathouse and supervision of Lake Lagunita, and the permits for groups to have information tables outside the Pavilion on Registration Days, and the supervision of materials included in the Reg packets. In all these areas, the Association has been put on the defensive-after what has been perhaps a natural progression of roles. The character of the ASSU has changed, from that of a primarily social and administrative body, to one that must recognize the division of its role into many different functions. The Association can justify its continued existence to the students it seeks to represent only if it can show that it is sensitive and responsive to students' needs and willing to exert its efforts on their behalf. 166 Lifeguards Bert Mason, Steve Bowers, Eric Bachelor, and Nick Farwell ASSU Office Staff: Sylvia Harvey Mary Ellen Perez Roberta Peters Yvonne Munks 167 ASSU Travel Service Flights to Reno? ... I think you want Sequoia. I'm sorry Ma'm, You'll have to contact the Airlines to find out the exact temperature of the baggage compartment-where your dog will be. No, we probably won't be having a charter flight to Winnemucka next year either. Information on Smog devices for cars? ... We're only the Travel Service, try the ASSU Information office to your right. Nairobi? Moratorium? Ram's Head?.. . ASSU loft is down the hall, up the stair. Is that what happened last year? Well, we didn't work here then. We'll have to ask the boss. Oh, he's not here now, but he'll call you for sure. Charter flights to Europe? ... Gorton!!!!!!!!! Anyone here for Ski Club??? Is this a movie? Free drinks? Is it a prop? No Grube, no free ticket today. Will Swift pay, or do we tell about The Black Flame? 168 Lynda Burman, Kerry Huennekens, Mary Kircher, Heidi Facer, Gorton De Mond, Maureen Sweeney. THEPILL MEMORIAL CHURCH ERECTED BY LATNROP TO THE CLORY OF V|NC MEMORY LELAND 7 Special Events Board Carla Breer and Adam Levin Cardinals Board If you have marvelled how in Autumn two dozen poles ever reach Lake Lag and become a Bonfire, or how in Spring students get organized to solicit for the Stanford Children's Convalescent Home; if you have wondered why a multitude of high school seniors should appear for one Saturday in May, or their parents in October; if you have questioned where on campus enthusiasm, ideas, and a unique disposition to create both incredible Homecoming themes and viable service projects might be found-ask one of us, let us tell you about it. First row: Bob Mai leek Pat Willard Charlene Hsu Susie Phillips Ann Craig Dailey Jones Second row: Jeff Fischer Ann McGilvray Vol VanDalsem Kimo McCormick Bob Cooks on Bill Ross Barb Cruse Bob Thompson Steve Corday 169 Day Care Center The Stanford Children's Day Care Center helps remove some of the pressure from busy Stanford families. For a small fee, competent, well-educated babysitters (i.e., Stanford undergraduates) direct a wide range of activities designed to entertain children for a few hours each weekday morning. Located in a building temporarily donated by the Children's Convalescent Hospital near the Stanford Shopping Center, this preschool enables mothers to attend classes, conduct research at Stanford, or simply get a good morning's rest. Meanwhile, it gives students here the opportunity to work (play) with toddlers and receive academic credit for their diligence. 170 171 Scenes from The Carnival Down Below, the 1969 Ram's Head Gaieties production 172 Seated: Linda Lowry, Becky Whitchousc, Wendy Wyss, Sally Zeimer; Standing: Lee Jordan, Bill Powell, Kit Cameron, Steven G. Ungar, Dick Walker, Mike Ashton. Ram’s Head RAM'S HEAD 1. Old English for cuckold. 2. A drama club at Stanford. Ram's Head moved into its umpty-umpth year with a different kind of Gaieties. They progressed into Winter One-Acts which were fun to watch as well as to produce. And a smashing successful Spring Musical. How does Ram's Head keep going? With all the competing demands on people's time (including, this year, the Moratorium which coexisted peacably with the Ram's Head office telephone), there are still enough wondertheatriciful nuts who turn out to paint sets, hang lights, and baste costumes-learning as they do, the family motto, so to speak. Ram's Head produces some good drama, some fun shows, and exciting parties. As Turulura Goldfarb, guiding spirit, once said, Dahling, Ram's Head isn't a drama group; it's a way of life'. 173 Drum Major Geordie Lowry; Pom Pon Girls: Christine Eskola, Diane Fields. Cathy Caballero, Linda Wright. Cathy McKenna First row: Charlie Carrera, Manager, Jack Funamura, Cheetah, Chris Peterson, Les Nicmi, Buck Gee, Gene Plagge, Chris Flegal. Dan Bernstein, Joel Hyatt, Gary Reid, Larry Conway, Jeff Barnes, Ted Sieger, Paul Bocckcrman, Tim Wong, Mike Machado, John Daley, Barry Hennings, Jeff Anderson, Lcn Moore. Dave Weinberg, Sam Boot, Tim Williams; Second row: Craig Miller, Larry Quan, Terry Rustin, Dan Cole, Juan Mendoza, Alec Rookc, Dell Berg, Mark Burgert, Jay Dohner, Oave Ruiz, Nate Schafer, Gibor Basri, Larry Darrow, Ken Howry, Doug Raff, Dave Vierling, John Sable, Mason Blacher. Todd Sammons. Dennis Morrow, Bill Nolan; Third Row: Les Klein, Gary Montonte, Art Riojas, Bert Comarelli, Rich Lauterio, Carl Carlson, Lee Salisbury, Chuck Fay, Larry Cofcr, Evan Shaffer, Steve Hansen, Ellis Madsen, Ken Petersen; Fourth row: Phil Imming, Dave McDavid, Randy White, Kim McCall, Tom Bowbat, Chris Vasquoz, Doug Anderson, Jerry Nelson, Hal Linko, Paul Dickerson, Rich Grabstein, John Childs, Pat Hession, Bob Franzini, Larry Barker, Frank Trowbridge, Randy Kincaid, Dave Tollerud, Don Spencer, Ken Kuntzleman, Phil Long, Dr. Arthur Barnes, Director; Fifth row: Rick Leicher, Dave Smith, Tom Ballard, Greg Grover, Manuel Sotomayer, Erik Reinholm, Mike Matlock, Phil Stubblofield, Terry Sapp, John Leslie, Steve Balgroski, Mike Mahoney, Rick Boiler, John Yates, Dean Cambell, Rick Miller, Oz Hurston, Roy Miller, Jim Lundborg, Al Mela, Randy Riese, Mark Loye, Dave DaMassa, Bob Olson, Bob Buyers; Sixth row: Scott Harriage, Alan Kcniston. Dave Siegfried, Alex Tseng, Scott Etherington, Geoff Rabone, Bruce Thom, Greg Lichtenstein, Scott McGeary, Wayne Lewis, Bill Miller, Budge Rewick. Dave Offen, Bill Durham, Clifford Lo, Don Berry, Rob Scott, Derek Williams, Glen Daum, Asst. Director 174 Marching Band The performing style of the Stanford Marching Band has been admired by spectators and envied by other marching bands on the West Coast for many years. During the 1969 football season other bands attempted to imitate the contemporary sound and look that have long since become the trademarks of the Stanford Bands. Although uniforms and music titles can be copied, spirit and class cannot. Much of the band's inimitability is due to the talents of Dr. Arthur Barnes. Director of Bands. Together with his new assistant, Glen Daum, Dr. Barnes arranges the rock and jazz selections used by the band during its performances. Dr. Barnes' arrangement of the National Anthem has likewise received widespread acclaim. The Stanford Band expanded to maximum size this year, and the increased enrollment has had some interesting results. The predominance of pre-medical students on the band staff has added an air of colorful erudition to the band's vocabulary, and rumor has it that the bass drummer (suspiciously called “Cheetah ) is in fact one of a rare strain of shy but sexy anthropoid apes-possibly the Mick Jagger of the primate world. The diversity and individuality within the Stanford Band produces a unique spontaneity, and must therefore be recognized as one of the keys to the band's success. The performing philosophy of the Stanford Band has always emphasized musical quality and the importance of the kinds of music selected for performance in maintaining a rapport with the student body as well as enlightened alumni. In keeping with this tradition the band held impromptu concerts in the undergraduate library, in Manzanita Park, and during the intermission of Big Game Gaieties. A series of post-game concerts was also initiated this year. The Band's annual parade through San Francisco on the eve of Big Game met with an enthusiastic crowd estimated at 1200. The San Francisco police force, apparently stymied by the problem of controlling such a large and inspired group, ended the festivities a bit early by ordering the crowd to disperse. The Big Game show also reflected the controversial nature of the Stanford Band. As the band's drum major donned an almost too realistic costume before the aroused gaze of some 160,000 eyes, the Stanford Band electrified the appreciative Big Game crowd with music from HAIR. Red Vest Band During the Winter Quarter the 8and becomes a smaller group to spur on the Stanford cagers and other winter sportsmen. Although enrollment is limited in the Red Vest Band, the bandsmen find greater opportunities for both musical and vocal expression, resulting in a unique esprit de corps. Dr. Arthur Barnes and Glen Daum prepare most of the arrangements and occasional charts are composed by individual members of the Band. Highlighting the basketball season is the Band's sojourn to Southern California for the USC and UCLA games. Among the many sidelights are enthusiastically-received performances at Disneyland, Busch Gardens, and various local beaches. The athletic sector of the Band emerges when the hungover players face off against their counterparts of the USC and UCLA bands in the traditional Saturday morning band basketball game. Aside from the Band's diverse interests and many talents, the keynote of the organization remains supporting the University and the sports program through exuberance and contemporary musicianship. 175 Yell Leaders Mike Ashcraft, Gary Griffith, Oon Hearn, Mike Jackson, Oamon Wright. Pompon Dollies Cathy Caballero, Christine Eskola, Diane Fields, Kathy McKenna, Linda Wright. 176 . i Wind Ensemble The Stanford Wind Ensemble, a small chamber band, besides appearing off campus at several high schools throughout the year also performs regularly each quarter on campus. This is the concert arm of the Stanford Band and was invited this year to play for the California Music Educators Association this spring at Foothill College. Concerts this year included performances of Symphonies of Berloiz and Hindemith, the wind music of Stravinsky and the English Band Music of Holst, Vaughan Williams and Grainger. 177 Men’s Glee Club The Men's Glee Club at Stanford has established itself as one of the leading vocal groups on campus. 8ob (our very talented director) has led the group for seven years. Each year he handpicks the best twenty musicians on campus to play in the jazz combo and the orchestra. The members couldn't enjoy themselves more. Whether singing a Renaissance motet or a stirring version of The Impossible Dream, the singers and instrumentalists create an excitement that knocks the members of the audience right out of their seats. It is rumored that one year a first tenor became so carried away singing Up, Up, and Away! that he suddenly lifted off and got stuck on the ceiling. The Glee Club and Orchestra go on a tour each spring vacation. We find that these tours really bring the group together. Once, our female vocalist ran off with the assistant director and got married. Needless to say, they missed a performance. The Axidentals, a small vocal group in the club, have their fun singing around girls' dorms or going up to the City and getting a cable car to join in a sing-along. But whatever we do, from San Diego to Seattle, we have a ball, and nobody in the group would miss it for anything (except maybe to run off and get married). First row: Dennis McMullen, Bob Andrews, John Yue, Hunt Kooiker, Mark Anderson, Jerome Robson, John Tam, Keith Kintigh, Andrew Grossman, Ed Correia, Don Stucky; Second row: Terry Ross, Lynn Karowsky, Paul Froom, Richard Halpcrn, Phillip Matthewson, Dave Emerson, Chris Rigos, Dan Boswrs, Bruce Hopkins; Third row: Norman Mau, Michael Kam, Bay Manning, Ken Kraft, Ken Heinz, Wesley Farrell, Richard Petty, Mike Herrero, Dennis Meyer, Jeffrey Luk; Fourth row: Robert MacKinnon, Director, William Gorham, Jeffrey Blanchard, Gerald Martin, Doug Horst, Randy Roth, Larry Hill, Andrew Kille, Bill Robertson, Glen Huntsberger, Alan Olson, Ken dcNault 178 179 First row: Larry Hill, Dave Lash, Bob Andrews, Russ Speidell, Doug Horst, Ken Kraft; Second row: Ken Peterson, Glen Huntsburgcr, Bob Hcywood, Rafael Henao, Dennis McMullen Nursing Students Who are these girls in uniform? You probably don't recognize them if you've been limiting your experience at Stanford to exploring the Inner Quad. These girls are prone to spend their time elsewhere. Their interests lie at the north corner of campus. They are students at the Stanford School of Nursing. The School is a five-year baccalaureate program in Nursing Education. The first two years are spent in gaining a background in science and humanities. This knowledge is then applied to the theory and practice of nursing care itself. The three years spent take the aspiring nurse through a program progressing from general principles and procedures to specialized areas such as Maternity or Psychiatric nursing. Each area discussed in class is experienced in practice through training at Stanford. After completing this extensive nursing education program, the student nurse receives a Bachelor of Science degree and the Public Health Nursing Certificate, as well as that of a Registered Nurse. So next time you see a girl in a sterile white cap with a great bedside manner, beware. One day it may be your bedpan she empties. First row: Eileen Gaspich, Mary Lou Williams, Janet Haugen, Jane Shafer, Linda Hausc, Mary Lou Cousins, Kathy Elliot, Sally Stacy; Second row: Pat Allen, Dawna Comey, Carolyn Fisher, Ann Plummer, Sue Loper, Cindi Friesen, Ginny Derby, Jan Henderson, Robin Hall, Connie Flood, Mitzi Plageman, Margaret Graves, Catherine Wass; Third row: Cathy Clark, Frances Cook, Pam Murray, Patty Fry, Helen Murphy, Susan 8urke, Barb Lerch, Carolyn Holmes, Margi Hamilton, Wendy Shipley, Connie Boyar 180 181 First row: John Johnson, Al Woolfe, Lcs Niemi, Larry Quan, Rich Swanberg. John Rcdenbaugh. Jerry Ross, Dennis Meyer, Don Spencer; Second row: Phil Wu, Mark Strickrron. Ralph Heimlich, Jeff Fisher The Stanford Daily Phones rang. Typewriters clattered. To the dismay of some and the bafflement of its staff. The Stanford Daily appeared on breakfast tables across the campus every weekday morning. Playing a less obtrusive role than in the past, The Daily passed through the year adapting to internal changes. Under the editorship of Mark Weinberger, much of the editorial hierarchy was abolished. The People took their tasks and did them; the days of rigid authority were gone. Management devolved to a Managing Board, whose members consulted with the entire staff on almost every major decision made during the year. The era of staff lunches was begun in earnest, the era of late copy deadlines and late newspapers continued. The business manager complained, but then business managers always try to take away the little joys of life from the People. Amid heated arguments and cold pi2za The Daily scrambled through another year. First row: Doug Wilson, Laurie Price, 8ob Michelet, Jesse Cedarbaum, Ralph Kostant, Percy LeBarry, Ed Kohn, John Sloan, Jonathan Dedmon; Second row: Fred Mann, Fred Leeson, Don Tollefson, Cathy Cooper, Cliff Nancarrow, Larry Diamond, Phil Revsin, Leo Nicholas, Frank Miller, Jane Corrigan, Paul Grushkin; Third row: Mark Weinberger, Bob Litterman, Stan Krute, John Arthur, Steve Ashley, Felicity Barringer, Marshall Kilduff, Julie Fleece, Jim Pcrloff, Dennis Perluss, Margie Wolf, Terry Rustin, Lang Atwood, Tom Given, John Eckhousc 182 183 Volume 156 Editor Mark Weinberger Volume 157 Editor Margie Wolf jpwr 184 Daily Business Staff Behind the indestructible wall, the industrious business staff lives in a world of wax, makeup slips, busy evenings, phone calls, and customers. Under the command of business manager Jeff Bonzon, the troops march into the business battlefield to solicit advertisers that help to support the Daily. Handling accounts with unmistakable finesse, dedicated staffers accept with pleasure the opportunity to help questioning customers. While filling afternoon hours with various activities, business members also come to the aid of classified customers seeking lost dogs, employment, quick sales, and a multitude of other advertisements. 185 Jo Freedman, Jean Fiddtt, Brad Baugh, Marta Mahoney, George Gugclman, Rich Adman, Jeff 8onzon, Jim Baer, Chuck Shackelford, Rick Peral Carmen Hansen, Publications Board's beauteous bookkeeper, fashion and advice editor, ambassador to New York and Los Altos, pool director, hot toddy taster, and secret love. 186 Publications Board Publications Board this year expanded its activity into an entirely new area. September saw the establishment of the ASSU Typesetting Shop under the Publications Board. The Typesetting Shop provides type composition for student publications at a substantial savings over commercial or University typesetting services previously used. Publications using the Shop include The Daily, The Colonist published by the Black Students' Union, The Arena and various newsletters. The Shop leases typesetting equipment and has a full-time staff of three supplemented by part-time help as needed. Operations are under the general control of the Publications Board chairman Tom Dawson. Other Publications Board concerns this year have centered around the legal liability of ASSU, the Publications Board and the University for libelous statements that may appear in ASSU publications. In keeping with this concern. Publications Board has retained a lawyer who is examining the legal interconnections with an eye toward making the individual publications carry as much of the responsibility for their own writing as is possible. Publications Board, then, has continued its general control over student publications with an eye toward making individual publications both legally more independent and financially more viable. S.M.I.P. The Stanford Management Intern Program exists as a result of the lack of business exposure in most students' educations. It is not SMIP's goal to convince people that business should be their career, but rather to provide them with an opportunity to make a well-founded decision for themselves. Under the directorship of Dennis Beck, this year's program has taken a new approach toward companies, as well as forming a distinguished Board of Advisors composed of leading businessmen. Dean Arjay Miller of the Business School, and SMIP's personal advisor, Mr. William Lowe. As a result, this year's program has doubled its number of placements over those of previous years, and is the largest program of its kind in any major university. 187 First row: Michael Huffington. Mr. William Lowe, Dennis Beck, Loudin Beam, Theodore Crooks; Second row: Hans Carstensen, James Roth well, Paul Winchester. Debate Association Evidence... tactics... cases... rebuttals... arguments... these are the elements Stanford debaters work with during the year. More than 200 students participate in some aspect of the forensic program each year. Most debate, but others write orations or participate in individual events such as extemporaneous and impromptu speaking. Other students help to organize and run Stanford's annual college invitational debate tournament and its annual high school tournament-one of the largest in the country. Stanford students compete in 20 to 30 forensic tournaments each year and last year ranked third in the nation overall squad win-loss record. Debate teams from foreign countries regularly visit the campus for public demonstration debates and during the summer a group of Stanford debaters toured Europe representing the American State Department. Members of the forensic squad represent Stanford each year in the oldest continuous debate competition in North America-the annual debate between Stanford and the University of California at Berkeley for the Medallion Joffre. To help introduce high school students to Stanford and the speech program, several of the senior debaters will help administer an eight week debate institute for high school students this summer. (Top) Seated are Ron Oster, Dr. Kenneth Mosier, Mrs. Vierolainen, Bob Cory, Kenneth Phi I pot, David Yancey, and Prime Minister Johannes Vierolainen in Helsinki, Finland, during Stanford's U.S State Department Tour of Europe, Summer, 1969. IAbove) Seated are Dan Furniss and Bryce Shirley. Standing are Tom Jaffe and Chris Gould. 188 (Left) Jim Podezerwinski, Ken Philpot, Dean Swartz, and Ed Oster are standing with the trophies won for Sweepstakes, First, and Second Places at the Nevada Great Western Debate Tournament. (Below) The Stanford Debate Council surveys its Third Place Sweepstakes Award for total war loss in the American Forensics Competition. Seated are Ken Philpot, chairman of Debate Council, Dr. Kenneth Mosier, director of forensics, Ron Oster, vice-chairman, and Debate Council members Dan Furniss, Bryce Shirley, Stuart Boskin, and Ed Oster. 189 KZSU Any verbal description of KZSU is at best only a small glimpse into a highly active and ever-changing student effort. As campus awareness expands culturally, politically, and personally, individuals begin to feel the need for self-expression and communication. KZSU has long maintained a desire to provide the Stanford community with another potent media arm-the immediacy of radio. The past year has created unprecedented interest in KZSU, in terms of both listenership and staff participation. Through our rigorous, 24-hour live coverage of the student demonstrations of last spring at AEL and Encina, KZSU provided an immediate relay of those turbulent events to the community, winning praise from all sides in the issue. Many community members also benefited from the popular taped broadcasts of outstanding classes each quarter. Offerings for past quarters have included Man and His Environment, The Philosophy of Law, and The Science of Creative Intelligence, all designed for armchair auditors. In addition to crisis coverage, class broadcasts, news, and public affairs, KZSU plays lots of music-about 90% of the twenty-hour broadcast day-ranging from lots of rock to classical concerts. During any given quarter, KZSU's staff includes over 50 DJ's, whole sole concern is to please the listener's ear, at 90.1 FM, 880 AM (in dorms). 1969-70 has been a year of growth for KZSU, in terms of a large staff (over 90), technical improvements, and greater community involvement and coverage. 190 Chief Engineer Mark Lawence, Business Manager Debbie Flagg, Station Manager Jeff Eustis, News Director Dan Cook, Program Director Terry Fotre Vj Young Republicans The YRs have done the usual stuff this year. We haven't had any elections and we haven't gotten too keyed about precinct work, so we've concentrated more or less on speakers, publications, and orgies. The Finch and Dominick programs and the Goldwater and Buckley receptions were great functions. The Stanford Republican has been rejuvenated. We've tried to keep the CCR and the CYR in the backs of our minds, but we nobly accept the suppliant call of the conventions. With the help of our non-partisan friends. Project HELP has thrived. Our morale has been high, our vision undimmed, our service beneficent. Stanford's resistance shows small signs of weakening. The cause advances. 191 Hans Beck, Don Ayer, John Rogers, Ellen Mayhcw, Buzz Thompson, Mike Wolf, Don Miles, Roger Reed, Eddie Anderson Below: Ron S|X gli Betsy Neville Linda Potter Dennis Shaver Jon Briskin In tree: Mike Armstrong Carl Anderson Overseas Campuses Board The Overseas Campuses Board is a student board organized independently to aid Stanford students and faculty in understanding and analyzing the Overseas Campuses program. The board alone is responsible for providing all orientation, other than that which is administrative, to those students about to depart for the overseas centers. In addition, early in the school year, the board sponsors an annual Overseas Campus Board Week, during which all freshmen and new students are able to learn the details of the Stanford Overseas Program. Finally, the board tries to assist the office when necessary, and generally encourage and promote the Overseas program. 192 Bowman Alumni House The Student-Alumni Associates is a voluntary organization whose goal is to further contact between students and alumni, at the same time informing both groups about the operations and activities of the University today. Each Student Associate works with the Alumni Club in his home area, as well as contacting local high schools, disseminating information about Stanford from the Admissions Office. On campus, the Associates arrange Student-Faculty-Alumni dinners, host prospective Stanford students and alumni visitors, work with alumni and the Placement Service to procure more summer jobs for students, and devise ways to get students and alumni together. The Alumni Association is a financially independent service organization working for the betterment of the University as a whole. The Bowman Alumni House is open to students-it is the headquarters of the Stanford-in-Washington Program, the Student-Alumni Associates, and the SMIP program, as well as being available as a meeting place for other campus student groups. The Alumni Association offers a variety of activities for the alumni body, including national and international clubs, special colleges for alumni to continue their education, and reunions for each class. 193 194 MECHA Initially with 10 members, the Mexican American Student Confederation, M.A.S.C.. was founded on October 10, 1968 for the purpose of expanding and furthering educational opportunities for Chicanos at Stanford University. Fall Quarter, October 1, 1969, under a new name and with expanded purpose, the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, MECHA, welcomed 200 Chicano students to Stanford University. Collectively as MECHA, the Chicano students plan not only to increase educational opportunities, but also the social, economic, and cultural aspects of the Chicano community, as well as providing a training ground for future leaders in the barrio and society as a whole. Some of MECHA's activities include the Chicano Work Study Project in Mountain View; the project's activities vary from tutorial programs and photography workshops to setting up a medical clinic for those families not able to afford proper medical care. El Cuadro Eating Club is set aside Saturday evenings for MECHA's members, and the Chicanas serve and assist in the preparation of the Mexican dinners prepared. Other happenings have included the new House warming party, several fiestas, and the organized picketing against Judge Chargin, the judge who made racist remarks to a Chicano youth; the Graham Junior High demerit system in Mountain View; and, of course, the Huelga” grape boycotting sessions since MECHA's activities commenced at Stanford. Future plans for MECHA include continuing recruitment of students and faculty; establishment of a Chicano Studies Institute; Chicano Seminars, and continuing cultural events. Felix Gutierrez, Assistant Dean of Students 195 Jerry Offttein Bob Cory Connie Collier Roger Reed Charlie Marz Political Union The Political Union Board continued to bring provocative speakers to campus. A symposium America on the Threshold of the Seventies was held in November featuring Mayor Joseph Alioto, Lt. Governor Ed Reinecke, Dr. Russell Kirk, Congressman John Tunney, Senator Barry Goldwater, and Harrison Salisbury of The New York Times. Other programs during the year included William F. Buckley and Joe Blatchford, Director of the Peace Corps. Each year the Political Union presents to the Stanford community authorities and interesting figures from all areas of the political spectrum. 196 Axe Commission This year Axe Comm, created card stunts for the six Stanford home game, sponsored the USC and Big Game rallies, and produced Spring Sing. Cal efforts to steal the Axe before Big Game were foiled, and the Axe will stand for yet another year in Tresidder Union. A most surprising profit came from sale of Beat Ca buttons. A mistake by the company producing these buttons had been turned into a popular fad by the students. Again, as in past years, the band helped us out greatly with their enthusiasm and manpower. 197 First row: Steve Biegenzahn, Page Read, Madeline Pollock, Frank Charlton, Laura Foster, Kathy Campbell, Kim Rose. Alan Curtiss, Jenni Bond, Liz Garrett, Don Wise. Lynda Hause, Luis Mesa, Neil Schwartz, Eric 8achelor, Susie Myers. Bob Rigdon, Ann Novak, Cece McRoskey, Connie Callahan. Pete Boutin; Second row: Shirley Standlee, Marilyn Franzini, LuAnn Hall. Chrissy Brant, Carolyn Charlton. Oscie Freear, Amanda Gooden, Tom Kidde, Scott Honegger. First row: Mrs. Jayne Dungan Darrell Hack Shari Kim Steve Cloud Rachel Walker Gail Achterman Ron Wyden Second row: Tom Hornbeak Judy Hanks Adriann Ricupero Dave Barber John Shcllcr Raul Field Third row: Leonard Moore Bill Considinc The Stanford Student Guide Service is the official university greeting committee for visitors to the campus. Approximately thirty-four student guides gave campus tours and trips to the top of the Hoover Tower for 55,000 visitors in 1969. The guides work seven days a week at several locations-the Cell, the Hoover Tower, and the I-Center at the Office for Foreign Visitors. The hourly pay is $1.75 per hour for regular guides and $2.00 per hour for the four Senior guides. Guides may work up to ten hours per week. There is a charge of .25 for the trip to the top of Hoover Tower for non-university visitors. This money helps to support the guide service. They made $7,000.00 in 1969. Guide Service Sigma Phi Sigma THE STANFORD PRE-MEDICAL SOCIETY (Sigma Phi Sigma) continued its program of service to the pre-med and to the community again this year. Seeking to expose the student to the diversity of opportunities in the medical profession, the Society sponsored such activities as the Day with a Doctor program, to give the pre-med an insight into the career of medicine and the life of a doctor. Quarterly surgery field trips to S.F. General Hospital were again enthusiastically attended. Various tours brought the pre-med to anywhere from a cardiac catheterization lab to a premature infant center. Several medical lectures, some by such famous doctors as Arthur Kornberg (DNA synthesis) and Robert Jamplis (head of P.A. Clinic), acquainted the students with current procedures and new discoveries. Many members served by working at the Stanford Children's Convalescent Home, while others donated their blood to local blood banks. The Society revised and printed its Pre-Medical Handbook and maintained up-to-date catalogues of U.S. medical and dental schools. Vondo L. Crouse, Russell Kridell, Don M. Nelson 198 AIIE A.I.I.E., the Stanford Student Chapter of the American Institute of Industrial Engineers, exists to provide meaningful, extra-curricular activities for its members. Such activities include student-faculty outings, discussions, and parties. Tours, guest speakers, and panel discussions are among the other functions provided by the organization. Projects undertaken by A.I.I.E. have in the past included studies of large-scale urban development projects, with this year's efforts being concentrated on a reevaluation of the Industrial Engineering Department at Stanford, its objectives, and methods of attaining them. The goals of the group are to extend the professional competence of its members in real world situations and to increase Faculty-student interaction within a social context. Frequent encounters and a close relationship with the Senior Chapter yield added advantages. Tau Beta Pi 199 M. Robert Leach, Peter Rubin, Carl Hartman, Roger Nelson, Gerald Ching, Professor David Thompson TMU Board A building is not so much as the people who live in it; but no one lives in Tresidder Memorial Student Union. Our community-on campus, off-campus, coffee-breaking secretaries, and faculty—will sit for an hour perhaps having lunch with colleagues or a friend who chanced to walk by. But we don't come to Tresidder by choice. The shelter and the services, the cheese T-burger and a cup of coffee, draw us to it. We eat and we bitch. We don't like the slick glass-plastic surface or the overly solid concrete; but we are stuck with them. They are one part of student life. Tresidder is our only student center. But remember sharing the early spring sun on the front deck. Perhaps the whole Union might not seem so bad. Tresidder Memorial Union Board is nine students who, in the best liberal tradition, have worked to make the concrete and glass seem more human. It was an impossible task; but perhaps the movies, lectures, concerts, and exhibits that constitute our effort have been sufficient ends in themselves. 200 First row: Lee Jordan Rod Perry Linda Lowry Tina Van Stone Donna Helliwell Second row: Thann Moy Lucy Enron Lee Erman Bill Bellinger Steven Ungar Jean Helliwell Third row: Bill Kendall John Riedel David Helliwell Brent Vernon Robert Helliwell Fencing Club Touche! Faithful to the legends of Scaramouche and the Masked Avenger, the Stanford Fencing Club gathers once a week to make shish-kabob. In the front row, en brochette, are Secretary-Treasurer Lee Jordan, President Rod Perry and Vice-President Linda Lowry. The Men's Team (Brent Vernon, Rod Perry, Doug Beers, Jeff Garwin, Bill Kendall, and Pat Dillon) and Women's Team (Linda Lowry, Lee Jordan, Thann Moy, and Linda Chapin) participate in Northern California Collegiate Fencing meets throughout the year. New this season, Stanford initiated the first Northern California Graduate Student Invitational meet. The club draws mainly from fencing classes taught by Mrs. Jean Helliwell. New students and unemployed Musketeers are always welcomed. Rifle Club Target shooting is fun! could well be the motto of the Stanford Rifle and Pistol Club. SR PG meets to shoot once each week at the rifle range on Galvez Street. The club provides a .22 caliber target pistols, rifles, and all necessary accessories. Instruction is offered for the inexperienced shooter. Modest club dues cover ammunition costs. 201 Stanford-in-Washington In 1969 sixty-two Stanford-in-Washington students participated as legislative interns. They were among over six hundred college students working on Capitol Hill during the summer in jobs affording them opportunities for participation in the national decision-making process. With interest in national politics at a higher level on college campuses today than ever before, the Stanford-in-Washington program has assumed new significance. It has become a means for opening channels of communication between students and government officials. The resulting contact has had effects in many areas. Returning Stanford students have found places in a wide variety of campus political organizations. Many have remained involved in national politics, intending to walk precincts for former Washington employers. During their stay in Washington they often influenced the mood of Congress and many of their summer projects will be subjects of high level discussion for many months. Finally, their opportunities have added depth and understanding to the thinking of a critical yet dedicated generation. Mexicali Work Project Thirty Stanford students, most of them undergraduates, returned to Mexicali, Baja California this year during spring break on the Mexicali Work Project. Staying at the Casa de la Juventud, the volunteers found unavoidable opportunities for contact with some of the hundreds of Mexicali schoolchildren. A work project occupied the better part of each day. Some of the boys built a fence for Senor Espana at his Clinica Ortopedica, while the rest of the group, including all the girls, painted a building at the Oasis del Nina, an orphanage outside Mexicali. The car caravan left campus at midnight on Friday of exam week. After six days in Mexico, each car headed home individually. Unfortunately, the start of every trip home was the border crossing; the friendly customs agents just could not seem to believe that Stanford students would never think of returning anything illegal to the states. During the week in Mexico the group had an opportunity to visit the beaches of San Felipe and the canyons at Guadelupe. The project featured sunshine, work, communication, friendship, music, broken Spanish and jiffy tummy: a 100% success! 202 Mike Pietzsch Chris Cobcy Sarah Norton Josh Cooper man Paula Kinsella Paul Richardson Steve Tipps 203 Orchestra Playing in a symphony orchestra is truly a unique experience—one must sublimate one's individuality to the collective spirit of the whole in order to produce a unified artistic effort, yet at the same time each member of the group must remain a soloist in the sense that collective artistry demands concentrated artistry on the part of the individual. It is the conductor who must control and refine this collective spirit-and Sandor Salgo, director of the Stanford Symphony, has repeatedly demonstrated his mastery of this task. In his twenty years as conductor at Stanford, Dr. Salgo has built up one of the finest symphonic groups of any university of comparable size. The Symphony performs all types of literature from the symphonic repertoire-this past year, the music of Beethoven was emphasized as part of the observance of Beethoven's 200th birthday. One innovation this year was the institution of informal concerts in student residences in addition to the regular formal performances in Dinkelspiel Auditorium. 204 University Choir Under the direction of Professor Harold C. Schmidt, the Memorial Church Choir completed another memorable year in 1969-70. With the help of University Organist Herbert Nanney and Assistant Director Sheridan Schroeter, the Choir braved the early hours of Sunday morning and a temperamental organ to add their red-robed presence to the weekly service. Together with the University Chorus they sang with the San Francisco Symphony, performing Beethoven's Missa Solemnis and his Symphony No. 9. On campus Beethoven's Mass in C highlighted Spring Quarter, and the popular Christmas Concert was a triumphant performance of Handel's Messiah. The keynote of the year was undoubtedly the Sunday admonition to Praise ye the Lord. 205 Friends of San Francisco 206 The Arena January 1970 marked the beginning of the third year of publication for Stanford's unique and controversial weekly newspaper. THE ARENA. Originally established as an organ for the expression of conservative and moderate views on campus affairs, the paper has branched out into criticism of the arts, occasional critiques of The Stanford Daily’s news policies and investigative reporting into the operations of student government. During winter quarter, after a particularly incisive expose of ASSU finances and repeated attacks on student government itself, the Student Senate called for an investigation of THE ARENA by the Publications Board to determine whether or not the paper was violating the By-Laws of the ASSU Constitution. At a Pub Board hearing, an ARENA representative pointed out that the publication had been in existence for over two years without ASSU sanction or support and did not care to be authorized or regulated by any agency. After some debate, the board voted 9 to 0 to eliminate any of the By-Laws or regulations which would have restricted the paper's distribution or solicitation of advertising. Irreverent as always, the following issue of THE ARENA contained yet another report on financial irregularities in the operation of the Student Financial Manager's office and the Student Organizations Fund. Supported by contributions from students, professors, staff and alumni, THE ARENA goes forth carrying the banner of independent libertarian-conservative journalism and looking forward to the time when it can expand its size and give the Daily competition on more than a once-a-week basis. 207 The 1970 Stanford Quad The production of this year's Quad involved many happy and many painful moments. Both the happiest and the most painful time is probably right now; today the final deadline goes to press, and although I am glad the job is over, it is hard to be happy. Today the campus awaits further violence. Today peace in Vietnam, in the cities, in our minds, seems farther away then ever before. Today it's hard to feel like this book is any real accomplishment. We set our goals high. We wanted to be students, editors, and friends. We wanted to cover more, involve more people, and reduce the hassle. Perhaps the goals were bound to conflict. But to those who tried to make it work with hard thinking, long nights, and a lot of patience, I cannot say enough to express my thanks. The process meant much more than the final product, but the book will be a great reminder. Several people must be mentioned in particular, although at least one hundred other probably should be too. Meal Cavanaugh put in many months of work, but even more patience. For laughing and scratching his way through the moods of the editor and the tyranny of deadlines I am very grateful. Niel Isbrandtsen probably the only one who knew what was happening with the staff and the book at all times. She is responsible for an excellent academics section and the completion of most deadlines. A more dependable editor and a warmer friend does not exist. 208 Kim Howell should be the editor of the 1971 QUAD. He doesn't want the job, but don't think we didn't try. An excellent darkroom manager and sports photographer, Kim was another staffer who was particularly dependable at deadline time. Maureen Jenks and Cherie Charles were probably the most independent editors on the staff and certainly the most efficient. I was never completely aware of what was happening with all sections of the book, but Maureen and Cherie made that unnecessary. Maureen's job was very vaguely defined, but very successfully carried out. And how she pulled it off I'll never know. Saying that John Coghlan was a great sports editor is like saying that Jesus was a Jew... Easily the best copy writer that the staff has ever had, bar none. Tight deadlines did not phase John... probably the most difficult person in the world to get angry at... a great friend. Sam Casey supplied excellent news reporting but was most helpful in working independently and dependably. Sam is now taking over the business end of the book and with his kind of ambition we might even break even. Grace and Marie at Photo-Repro put up with the editor's constant failure to meet copy deadlines with patience and many favors. How they managed to keep smiling I don't know, but they were responsible for the completion of nearly every deadline one time... almost. To the many others who helped along the way, many thanks. To the nine people listed above, the book is dedicated to you. It's been bizarre. —Ralph Peterson 210 211 Nairobi College Nairobi College, a community organized and sponsored project in East Palo Alto, first came to the attention of the majority of Stanford students when a book drive was launched during fall quarter. The newly-opened independent college needed donations of books and time to expand its courses and programs. Operating on a very limited budget, the success of the drive was decisive in determining how rapidly the college would develop. The impetus for establishing this form of college resulted from the firing of several black instructors in the College Readiness Program at the College of San Mateo. The director of that program, Robert Hoover, explained that the .desire for the college was a desire to study without having to hassle with teachers, administrators, and other students; a chance just to go to school. It was felt that the regular college system was forcing a foreign value system on the black students. Nairobi College was organized by adult leaders but is almost entirely run by students. The offices are manned by student help at all hours of the day. They have equal representation on the Advisory Board and planning commissions. In addition, there is a screening committee composed of students for all applicants to teaching positions. The curricular includes courses common to all colleges across the country such as sociology, psychology, literature and physics, in addition to classes relating to black history and legal problems which the black community has encountered. Future plans include the participation of all Nairobi students in working for a minimum of four hours per day in local service organizations such as health centers, schools, and welfare, probation and legal aid offices, as part of their regular program. Mr. Hoover also emphasizes the necessity of applying individual counseling in the project. He feels that the student must be assured that he is capable of attaining an advanced education. To achieve this, all staff and faculty members are expected to assume advising responsibilities. Although he doesn't expect the school to gain accreditation immediately, Mr. Hoover doesn't feel that Nairobi students will have great difficulty getting into other schools. Written agreements have already been obtained to accept transfer credit from other colleges like Scripps and Central Michigan University. 212 213 When we try to pick out anything by itself we find that it's hitched to everything else in the universe. —John Muir And brought you into a plentiful country to eat the fruit thereof: but when ye entered ye defiled my land, and made mine heritage an abomination. 214 -Jeremiah 2:7 Stanford Conservation Group The Stanford Conservation group is approximately 400 people learning, working to overcome pollution, overpopulation, and unsound use of our natural resources. We feel that this country should no longer boast our affluence while we choke on our effluence. Nor should we needlessly defile the countryside in the name of progress. Most of all we feel that we cannot afford to sit back and silently allow Homo sapiens to commit suicide. We sponsor research committees, debates, films, outings, and other services in our efforts to stimulate serious, action-oriented participation aimed at finding and implementing sensible, feasible alternatives to the unsound facets of our way of life—in short, a search for survival. As a further statement of our purpose we hope that you will look at these pictures and think about them, reflecting on how you personally fail to live within your eco system today. Pictures are courtesy of Donald Aitken (left above), Jim Tidwell (left below), and Jim Absher (this page). So profound is our ignorance and so high our presumption...and as we do not see the cause, we invoke cataclysms to devastate the world, or invent laws on the limitation of the forms of life. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species (1872) 215 Army ROTC The Army ROTC program at Stanford has undergone a healthful restructuring this year. Under the leadership of Colonel Ramey the academic format has been modified to create a more stimulating and intellectually significant course. The drill program has been completely revamped to provide a more practical, convenient, and challenging training experience. Cadet enthusiasm for the new approaches is high and particularly evident during the field training periods. The advanced course summer camp has also been redesigned, and it remains the most mind building part of the program. Social functions, service projects, and other extracurricular activities continue to be carried out by interested cadets. All in all, the battalion members find Stanford Army ROTC a rewarding experience in personal development and national service. 216 217 Keio Committee AUSA The Association of the United States Army (AUSA) Company at Stanford is a volunteer organization composed of ROTC cadets who are interested in improving themselves professionally, while concurrently extending services and information to the public about ROTC and the Army in general. Speakers and special programs are provided not only for AUSA members, but for all cadets and members of the Stanford community as well. Public service projects, such as assisting local law enforcement agencies search for missing children, have been provided by the company this year. The AUSA company provided to local radio stations public service announcements, informing the general citizenry about ROTC and its place on the campus and in the community. AUSA cadets also accompany Army officers to local high school orientations to present the college student's view on ROTC. Familiarization with the formal, social aspects of the military was provided to all cadets and their guests at the Annual Military Ball. AUSA sponsors a basketball team which competes in intramural contests. Through an advisory committee, AUSA provides feedback to the Professor of Military Science on cadet reactions to the program, and how it might be improved. 218 International Association The International Association, the largest student organization on the Stanford campus, serves as the coordinating body for a wide spectrum of international activities-social, cultural and political-at Stanford. Membership is available to all interested members of the Stanford community, and the membership is evenly balanced between graduate students and undergraduates, foreign students and Americans. In addition to sponsoring a year-long festival showing the best in international films, the IA regular features: • Friday Happy Hours at the 1-Center and at the international houses • Saturday Evenings Abroad-Popular social and cultural excursions via films, songs and dances, customs and refreshments, to a different country each week • Current Events Coffee Hours—Topical discussion of political happenings in a rapidly changing world • Barbarian 777� ff$—Published at intervals thorughout the year, the IA newspaper features analysis of both domestic and international political issues. • Area Desks-Regionally oriented policy study groups • Undergraduate Specials—IA members with unique skills or qualifications teach courses for credit within the University • Language Exchange—The IA will match you with someone who wants to exchange his language for yours. • Jazz Casuals-Small groups jam weekly at the 1-Center • Folk Nights-Ethnic music from all over the world 219 Ski Club Membership in the Ski Club totaled over two hundred this year, the largest in its history. In an attempt to expand its activities this year, the Ski Club not only staged the traditional Winter Carnival, but operated a ski cabin, presented some outstanding ski flicks, posted weekend snow reports, and stocked an information rack on ski areas accessible from the Stanford campus. Even more is planned for next season. Such items as Stanford Ski Patrol and instructors' groups are on the agenda. The executive committee is already soliciting posts as ski area campus representatives for interested Stanford skiiers. In spite of less than perfect weather conditions, Stanford Winter Carnival participants had a great weekend at Squaw Valley. Old time favorites such as the beer slalom, broom hockey game, dance, and sauna pool facilities helped compensate for very windy and wet slopes. The ski cabin, right on the shores of Lake Tahoe, was filled to capacity most weekends, as those who spent nights curled in sleeping bags by the fireplace will tell you. However small, it provided a cheap and convenient place for Stanford skiiers to stay this season and the lease for a bigger cabin was negotiated this spring. 220 Seated: Kniesscl Whitcstor. Bob Meyer, Clydia Cuykondall, Linda Rosenthal; Standing: Bryce Shirley. Paul Sherman. Fischer Alu, Standard Head. Nathan . Schafer, Rodney Brown, Tim Noonan. Student Firemen 221 • NO MUSIC- PLAYING NO DRUMMING • NO SOUND REPRODUCING INSTRUMENTS NO LOITERING NO SLEEPING ‘ BETWEEN 9 00 PM TO 7-00 AM VIOLATION OF ABOVE' REGULATION ’ IS A MISDEMEANOR _ CHAPTER VI ARTICLE 2 SECTION 15 ' ' PARK CODE —--------- 222 SWOPSI Stanford Workshops on Political and Social Issues was organized during the summer of 1969 by Robert Jaffe and Joel Primack, graduate students at SLAC, and Joyce Kobayashi, a member of the ASSU Council of Presidents. It grew out of a desire to turn Stanford's curriculum more directly toward the consideration of solutions to urgent social and political problems by involving the students and particular resources of the Stanford community in an action-oriented program founded in a thorough knowledge and understanding of the facts. During fall quarter, the first group of SWOPSI offerings included 10 workshops on such diverse issues as air pollution in the Bay Area, California logging policy, the delivery of health services. University research policy, and problems of disarmament negotiations. Almost 200 students and other members of the Stanford community participated in these workshops; there were about 300 participants in the 18 workshops offered during winter quarter. Additional SWOPSI student organizers helped enlarge the program to approximately 25 workshop offerings for spring quarter-a size which will probably be maintained next year. The basic objectives of all SWOPSI workshops is to gain new insight into contemporary issues of political and social consequence by developing the skill and expertise necessary to confront them; and, ultimately, to affect more people than are actually members of the workshop, through the publication of research findings; public forums; or by using the results to form the basis of concrete legal, political or community action. Among the first of the workshop projects completed this year were substantial publications on logging policy in San Mateo County, and on air pollution in the Bay Area, encompassing both the technical and political aspects of these problems. SWOPSI catalogues are handed out in registration lines and serve to notify students of the workshops being offered for that quarter. Most workshops are offered for some kind of academic credit, generally on a pass fail basis, and meet weekly as seminars, although the bulk of the work is done through individual research, interviews and other sorts of field research. Financial support for operating and project-expenditures was initially furnished through the Innovation Fund. Grant support from outside agencies is being sought to finance the program for next year. 223 Christian Science For the Christian Science Organization at Stanford, 1969-70 proved to be a year of much activity and growth. There were two ski trips, challenge touch football games with the Organizations from San Jose and Cal. and a Christmas reception with refreshments and singing. The Org also sponsored two Christian Science lectures on campus, designed to acquaint members of the academic community with Christian Science. After the lecture many visitors came to the Organization's regular Tuesday evening meetings. 224 First row: Barbara Lee, April Hopkins, Carol Brown, Martha Bell, Carolyn Clark, Susie Peterson, Karen Creighton, Joy Rendahl; Second row: Chris Johnson, Dave Aleshirc, Joe E Her, Scott Kanauer, Randy White, Chris Hocker, Kurt Sawyer, Don Mitchell, Jon Gray; Third row: Phil Howell, Bill O'Dell, Rob Waldo, George Denninger, Bill Cox, Bob Cochran, Dick Frantzreb, Tom Russell. 225 226 228 RECRUITMENT AT STANFORD by John Coghlan In the opinion of the committee, tradition may be the only reason for the current form of intercollegiate athletics. Intercollegiate athletics is characterized by excessive publicity; it dominates the image of the University that is seen by a substantial portion of the public; it involves special procedures, such as the recruiting of students for athletic teams, and it entails elaborate and highly professional operating organizations. These statements, to some degree, apply to essentially all major universities of the country (with one notable exception) ranging from those institutions at the top of objective academic rankings, to those which are notorious as 'football' schools. -SES Committee Report on Intercollegiate Athletics The word recruiting has many connotations on a college campus—it is a way of life for the coaches, the only means by which they have any hope of success in their respective calibers of competition; it is an anathema to many educators, who see it siphoning off funds to lure worthless students to the University; and it is a constant source of rumor and speculation among the students, who see in it clandestine arrangements between athletes, sports administrators, and alumni benefactors. Recruiting itself contains part of each of these elements, in varying proportions as one travels from college to college, but it is actually only one part of a larger picture: recruiting must also include financial and academic assistance given to the athlete after he enrolls, and must even brush with the issue of the worth of intercollegiate athletic competition. One of the most difficult aspects of a study of recruiting is the separation of fact and fiction. Athletes and coaches have a vested interest, and outsiders have no access to the information. It is rumor that UCLA center Steve Patterson had intended to go to Stanford before UCLA sent him photographs of the Humphrey demonstration in 1967 and prodded him about the kind of school he wanted to represent. It is closer to fact to allege that a former Northwestern football player, who eventually played on the Denver Broncos taxi squad, received $1000 each year he played football as compensation for work he did for the athletic department as well as a new sports car for the minimal cost of $500, courtesy of the beneficence of an alumnus. It is absolute fact that one Stanford footballer. recruited while in high school by over sixty colleges, was approached by an Arizona State University alumnus during his visit to the school and was offered monetary inducements to enroll. And now, what about Stanford? Where do we fit into the scheme of recruiting? The SES report on the Extra-Curriculum contains a statement on recruitment policy in its summary of recommendations. It states that For the most part, recruitment policies should be aimed at getting top level students who are also athletes. This policy would mean finding student athletes well above minimum standards. It would insure getting students who could participate in athletics and still perform well academically. The educational opportunities at Stanford should be the primary appeal. In theory, recruiting is a simple process. It consists of visits made by the boy to the school, visits made by the school to the boy's home, correspondence between the school and the boy, and discussions of financial aid if the boy is in need. This process would seem to be standardized by the NCAA rule that limits the number of visits to the campus (and their duration) that each recruited athlete may have. It specifies that the school may pay for the athlete's transportation on one trip, and restricts the number of times the school can visit the boy at his home. It further states that a school must cease its attempts to enroll an athlete at his request. Yet even within these limits, recruiting is of major importance in enrolling high school athletes. Basketball Coach Howie Dallmar states that a boy will feel unwanted if the school does not show interest in him, since the top athletes are sought by everyone. He maintains firmly that, You have to let a boy know you want him to attend your school. Other coaches agreed with this, emphasizing that concomitant with an end to recruiting would be an end to competition at its present levels. Swimming Coach Jim Gaughran corroborated this, pointing out that only twenty-five percent of his top swimmers would be at Stanford if they had not been searched out. Recruiting is most intense in football, which also gets the lion's share of athletic grants-in-aid, Stanford's equivalent of athletic scholarships. Reports from alumni in the area and press releases are scanned before the coaches pour over 229 game films from hundreds of high schools with promising players. The coaches almost never see games featuring these players because of the pressures of Stanford's own season; the burden of proof lies on these films. After the season, the coaches are dispatched to different areas of the country and begin to correspond with the selections and to visit them at their homes. In less lucrative sports like swimming, almost all recruiting is done by mail. Coach Gaughran relates that he has never made a trip for the sole purpose of recruiting. In any event, the schools try to arrange for the boy to visit the campus. When he arrives, another athlete is assigned to him to give him a tour of the campus. The athlete is often taken to an athletic contest and a barbecue, or sometimes a party. He usually spends the night in the guide's room. Interviews with the coaches touch on the sport, but are also directed towards stressing the academic benefits of Stanford; to a great extent this is because it is one of Stanford's biggest assets, but another reason is that Stanford's tuition is so high and its ability to mete out financial aid to athletes so limited. The intense competition between schools is not apparent in this account of a visit. Nonetheless, there are many small things that coaches use to pressure a boy. Oregon State University used an advertisement that appeared in the Super Bowl program in its recruiting drive. The advertisement was about Astroturf, and pictured a football player being carried off the field. The headline implied that football players incurred fewer knee injuries on Astroturf than on grass. Parents of recruits were shown the advertisement in hopes that they would keep their sons from going to schools like Stanford that have natural grass turfs. This practice was decried by Sports Information Director Bob Murphy, who noted that by the end of the year OSU had had eleven knee injuries on Astroturf, while Stanford had suffered only one, that coming on Astroturf. Other coaches have used Stanford's academic prestige against it, claiming that the athletes will have to work too much to be able to devote enough time to his sport. These techniques, the financial arrangements mentioned earlier, and other similar methods form the part of recruiting that is unsavory-the part everyone has heard of, but about which so few know the facts. Even with the visits and the propaganda, an offer of financial aid is a very important inducement. Coach Gaughran explained it in this way: there is a prestige factor in getting a free ride at a college. A boy can go home and show his friends something tangible that a college has offered him. Unfortunately, this prestige factor can lead to the offering of grants to athletes in amounts that exceed their actual need. Gaughran lamented that Now you almost have to offer full room, board, and tuition to the recruit, even to students who don't really need help. The Athletic Department does not have the funds to offer these inducements to all its recruited athletes. One source of money for Athletic Department grants-in-aid to recruited student athletes is the Buck Club, an organization of Stanford alumni and friends that raises money for a fund controlled by Director of Athletics Chuck Taylor. The only other sources are special awards given for specific sports by alumni, a category that totaled over $60,000 last year. In contrast, the Buck Club raised $260,000 in 1969. The majority of this money goes to football grants, but all of it is parcelled out to the various sports depending on their relative importance and the quality of the crop in each sport. Recruiters can tell a boy if he will be recommended for a grant and exactly how much he can expect in the form of aid. The awards are given for one year and are renewable each spring, contingent upon the athlete's continuation in a sport and normal progress towards graduation. A boy who quits a sport in the middle of a year retains his grant until the end of that year. Due to the liberalization of ao NCAA rule, schools are no longer limited in the number of free rides that can be given for room and board. Taylor says that this rule hurts a school like Stanford, which because of its limited funds and high tuition is unable to award as many of these grants as other schools in the conference. Other forms of aid are also available to athletes to help with the balance of their bill. Hashing, as with regular students, will pay for their board, but the athletes are also eligible for Buck Club hashing grants which pay up to 45% of the board bill, or that part of meal costs which are not earned. The athletes also have preference in getting jobs with the Athletic Department, usually at the Corporation Yard for a salary of $2.50 an hour. 230 231 232 Admittedly, the supervision on these jobs is not rigorous, although Taylor has called the program the best in the conference. The work that is done costs the university about $20,000 per year, with about 55% of the work being essential, and about 45% of it created for the athletes, work we like to have done but that is non-essential like painting and weeding, in the words of Taylor. Still, the work program has seen a decline in the number of hours worked in recent years. Pete Kmetovic, Manager of Operations and Student Affairs in the Athletic Department, attributes this decrease to the greater amounts of money that athletes are making in summer jobs, and to an increase in dollar amounts of the aid that recruited athletes are receiving from the department. The decline of the work program points out a fact touched on by Gaughran earlier: that the money does not necessarily go where the need is greatest. Gaughran castigated the present recruiting system and its consequences, asserting that We aren't living within the spirit of the rules ourselves, because we have to compete. He was joined by Athletics Director Taylor in favoring a system based absolutely on need for all the universities in the conference placed under the direction of the College Scholarship Service. Whether this system changes or not, the availability of grants-in-aid to athletes at Stanford will decrease markedly in the near future. Buck Club gifts increase at an annual rate of about 10%, Taylor explained, but tuition is rising much faster than that in absolute terms. Grants will be sparse for all the coaches over the next few years; a situation that could either begin a trend towards a need standard, or result in the same high grants to recruited athletes with a decrease in the number of grants available for more needy but less highly-sought athletes. The question remains as to how much of a departure from a need standard the University is willing to tolerate. Finally, there is the question of to what degree athletes at Stanford are displacing other qualified students who must be rejected because of inadequate space. Taylor maintains that the athlete is like gifted students in other areas-he has something unusual that sets him apart from the mass of applicants. True, there is no separate admissions policy for athletes. But it would be naive to believe that the Department of Athletics does not have influence over and above its position as one of the many departments. The fact that the Buck Club is willing to bear much of the financial burden for recruited athletes is in itself a factor favoring their admission, as the University can allocate the aid that might otherwise have been used for them, diverting it to give more complete scholarship aid for other students not involved in athletics. A useful statistic in the evaluation of the power of the department in admissions is the grade-point averages of the athletes in high school versus those of the average Stanford student. The difference, as we would expect, is significant: 57% of the recruited athletes at Stanford had grade-points between 3.5 and 4.0 in high school; this contrasts with 88% of the student body as a whole. Another index of the academic qualifications of recruited athletes is how well they fare after they enroll at Stanford. The average athlete maintains a 2.63 GPA at Stanford, the average non-athlete, 2.73. When the athletes' respective sports are taken into account,' it is difficult to find a difference in the academic performance of athletes and non-athletes. 'There is no evidence of any effort on the teaching function of the university. There are no 'snap' courses designed for athletes and no attempts to provide special curricula for an athlete to get through the University in any way different from that of the average student. This seems at first to be an unwarranted conclusion. Certainly the basis for a contrary belief does exist. Student Affairs head Kmetovic in a 1967 interview, said that he talked with student athletes to get recommendations on courses that seem to be easier, and passed these suggestions on to athletes who came to him for help, providing a one quarter shot to help the boy get back on his feet. Both Taylor and Kmetovic state that his is no longer the case, citing pass-fail grading and the liberalization of General Studies requirements as reasons why this practice has been discontinued. Taylor added that every student, whether athlete or not, is familiar with what may be considered gut courses, and need not ask anyone except his fellow students. Concluded Kmetovic: I think the whole curriculum has changed so much that this doesn't apply anymore. This is most likely accurate, but the system was certainly an effective one while it was in operation. Health Education 400, a course in a department that no longer 233 exists at Stanford, was one of these recommended gut courses; in late 1967 the DAILY ran a feature on it. The course could be taken for up to sixteen units per quarter, more than the total quarterly academic load of the average student at Stanford. Of the thirteen students enrolled in the course in the summer of 1966, three were athletes. One varsity basketball team member took the course for twelve units, another for ten. A football star signed up for eight units. In the summer of 1967, sixteen students took the course. With the special permission of the professor, one football player took the course for eight units in absentia. He was one of eleven to receive an A- or an A that quarter. Chuck Taylor explains that the course was an accredited part of the curriculum, open to anyone. There was no preference shown to athletes, he maintains; the professor told the class exactly what the requirements were for an A, and anyone could fulfill them if he wanted to put in the work. A more serious allegation than that of steering athletes to easier courses would be that of actual preference for athletes in the grading of certain courses. The Athletic Department could play no role in this practice, but that would not keep the situation from being a grave one. According to campus rumor, at the forefront of the accused stands a professor in the Political Science Department whose grading system is supposed to resemble the simplistic A for Athletes, B for Boys, and C for Coeds curve. However, a study of one of this professor's largest lecture classes showed exactly the opposite. Varsity athletes, comprising 12% of the class, received only 5% of the A's. Whereas the non-athlete averaged 2.85 in the course, the average varsity athlete obtained a 2.58, a disparity considerably greater than that in other classes across the board. It is conceivable that the rumors that initiated this survey and those concerning other courses in the curriculum have similar foundations in fact. The Athletic Department provides free tutoring for athletes as well, a program that costs it close to $2,000 per year. To obtain tutoring in a subject, the athlete must go to the department with a note signed by his professor to the effect that he may seek help. A far cry from the days when many athletes got their term papers ghost-written for them, the tutors hired by the Athletic Department come from the Placement Service, the same organization that provides tutors for the rest of the campus community. But why does the Athletic Department foot the bill? This is inconsistent with the policy of other departments in the University, and it seems even more illogical that the University, which is striving to integrate the Athletic Department into its departmental system more fully, would allow that department to maintain what appears to be an unnecessary and divergent practice. The question of improprieties aside, it is still significant that a great deal of money is expended by Stanford in the recruiting of athletes and for intercollegiate sports in general. Critics of the program cite these expenditures as a major inequity, a situation contrary to the main purpose of the University. But the research underlying this study indicated that intercollegiate athletics do have significant value at Stanford-not in and of themselves, but as a result of the benefits that accrue to the student body and therefore the University because of them. Admittedly, there are weaknesses in the Athletic Department, and we must reconcile these weaknesses with the overall objectives of the University. Still, ninety-three per cent of all undergraduates were at the Big Game in 1969; twenty per cent of male undergraduates compete in intercollegiate sports; almost five thousand students compete in the intramural program. Some of the benefits can be inferred from these statistics, but they are more obvious. Football receipts account for 80% of the income of the Athletic Department, part of which pays for the physical education program and the intramural program. De-emphasizing recruiting and facing easier competition would not lessen the cost of the program, only the revenues. Ideally, Stanford's principal consideration in intercollegiate athletics should be avoiding professionalism; in keeping a sharp lookout for its symptoms, we are performing a salutary service for the Athletic Department. The real complaint should lie with the 34% of the athletes interviewed in an SES study who consider their financial aid as payment for their participation. Under the present circumstances, they may be correct; but possibly they are the 34% who should not be receiving aid. It was a proud look and a smile that came over the face of tackle Pete Lazetich as he said the words: Stanford? They didn't offer me nothing! 234 fall sports 235 236 CHARLIE BROWN, I JUST SAW THE MOST UNBELIEVABLE FOOTBALL CLAMP FVEP Dl AVFD... THE HOME TEAM WAS BEHIND SIX-TO- NOTHING WITH ONLY THREE SECON0S TO PLAY„.THEY HAD THE BAIL ON THEIR OWN ONE-YARD LINE... THE QUARTERBACK. TOOK THE BAU, FADED BACK BEHIND HIS OWN GOALPOSTS AND THREW A PERFECT PAM TO THE LEFT ENO WHO WHIRLED AWAY FROM FOUR GUYS AHO RAN All THE WA FOR A TOUCHOOWNl THE FANS WENT WILD YOO SHOULD HAVE SEEN THEM PEOPLE WERE JUMPING UP ANO DOWN, AND WHEN THEY KICKED THE EXTRA POINT, THOUSANDS OF PFOPLE RAN OUT OH THE FIELD LA (ASHING ANOSCREAN] ING'THE FANS A HO THE PLAYERS WERE SO HAPPY THEY WERE ROLLING ON THE GROUND ANO HUGGING EACH OTHER AND OAHCING AND EVERYTHING Y 237 A Tie for Second was not enough for Stanford football fans this year. The Indians, highly-touted in the pre-season polls, were hungry. Derailed in the fourth game of a young season by USC, the 1968 squad never recovered, and was able to salvage only a single tie in its next three games. In 1969, there was pride to be salvaged. And a grudge to settle with the Southlanders. Seeming parallels with 1968 could be drawn everywhere, as after the fourth game of 1969 Stanford had fallen in the last minute of two games, Purdue and USC. The difference between the squad of 1969 and its predecessor was illustrated throughout the remainder of the season. The snake-bite ruse was discarded, and suddenly there was a living, fighting units, tough when things were going well and tougher when they weren't. The Indians began to make their own breaks. Trailing UCLA by three points in the final quarter, Stanford marched down the field to knot the score. Tallies at the end of each of four consecutive offensive series wiped out a seven-point Air Force lead and inundated the Falcons. And finally, in the Biggest Game, the squad turned a five-point deficit late in the fourth quarter into a one-point triumph over an aroused California team. Coach John Ralston understood when he said about the team's early seventeen-point lead in that game, We got it too easily. Nothing could be allowed to come easily in 1969; through experience the team had learned that what comes easily is all too often squandered. All that counted was that which was battled over. In 1969, the Indians were always battling. To battle, one needs ammunition, and of that there was no shortage. The fall unveiled one of the most exciting and explosive offensive units ever to wear red and white. The 494 yard-per-game average that the Stanford machine ground out ranked them third nationally in total offense, second in passing offense, and ninth in team scoring. Under this barrage, records fell and individuals excelled. Quarterback Jim Plunkett shattered five Pacific-8 records over the season, finishing third in the nation in passing and establishing himself as a prime candidate for the Heisman trophy in 1970. Placekicker Steve Horowitz emerged from the ignominy he befell in 1968 to break Stanford field goal and conversion marks, and to place third nationally in kick-scoring. Senior linebacker Don Parish was a first-team All-American, and was joined on the coaches' all-Pac-8 team by Plunkett, center John Sande, tight end Bob Moore, and defensive back Rich Keller. Altogether, only ten starters from the offensive and defensive units will graduate. For their replacements and the corps of starters who will return in 1970, one idea predominates: they still have a grudge to settle. 238 First row: Demea Washington. Jack Lasater, Bob Moore, Dave Sharp, Bob Reinhard, John Sande, Jim Plunkett, Don Bunce. Dan Lightfoot, George Crooks, Pete Seymour, Howie Williams, Bubba 8rown, Jim Cross, Art Smiley; Second row: Tom Soncs, Miles Moore, Andy Herrero, Pete Lazetich, Hillary Shockley, Jackie Brown, Dick Oliver, Jack Alustiza, Ron Fujikawa. Pat Preston, Younger Klippert, Phil Satre, Dave Tipton, Ron Kadziel; Third row: Bill Meyers, Pete Crosby, Vern Gant. Terrell Smith, Tim McClure, Jack Schultz, Wade Killefer, Kimo McCormick, Bill Alexander, Rich Tipton, Dennis Moore. Jim Hoftiezer, Don Alvarado. Darrell Waters; Fourth row: Phil Murphy, Randy Vataha, Steve Platt, Dennis Sheehan, Steve Horowitz, Jim Squeri, DaveGrossi, Greg Sampson, Steve Zeisler, Charlie Saibel, Tim Cordial, Mike Ewing. Brian Porter. Jeff Siemon; Fifth row: Steve Brooks, John Koehn. Bill Honey, Jim Merrill, Mike Carrigan, Mark Brown, Doug Adams. Tim Schallich, Steve Jubb, Mike Kloos. Lee Fair, Don Parish, Rich Godderz, Larry Butler, Roger Cowan, Bob Brown; Sixth row: Coaches Christiansen. Gambold, McCartney, Thomas, Ralston, De Sylvia, Theder, Moultrie, Peasley, White (First row) Coach Harvickson, Russ Lenk, Bill Walsh, Dan Furniss, Barr Curry, Steve Murray, Reggie Sanderson, Coach Moultrie. Captain Eric Cross, Alan Stevenson. Ray Espinosa. Jim Kaffcn, Gary Riekes, Cliff Hams, Mike Boryla; (Second row) Scott Boughton, Pete Hanson. Bob Burmeister. Pat Moore, Glen Stone, Dave Williams, John McCormick, Dennis Peterson, George Giokaris, Doug Single, Steve Livesy, Dan Tomlinson, Mike Sobolik, Mark Leighton, Dewey Twomey; (Third row) Coach Williams, Coach Brill, Don Mulford, Joe Martin, Jim Wise, Duke Williams, Perry Simmons, Phil Inn, Steve Hagata, Dave Anderson, Rodney Brown, Randy Gaynor, Pierre Perreault, Al Dyson, Bill Scott, 8ob 8erry, Tom Klein, Bill Wiley, Fred Hemphill, Bill Roberds, Charles McCloud. Coach Massey, Coach Cooper 239 Field Position and the long ball were they keys on a warm fall afternoon. Although working from a limited play book, Stanford scored nine touchdowns to trounce the Spartans, 63-21. Jim Plunkett drove the Tribe down the field three times in the first quarter, with fullback Howie Williams scoring on short plunges each time while San Jose could not penetrate farther than its own 31-yard line. Plunkett completed 13 of 15 passes for 221 yards and two touchdowns before leaving in the third quarter; his understudies Don Bunce, Ron Fujikawa, and Tim Cordial tacked on two more touchdowns by completing 7 of 9 attempts in a game which saw 46 Stanford players join the fracas. Flankers Demea Washington and Randy Vataha snared nine passes for a total of 187 yards with Washington getting two touchdowns, one a 59-yarder from Bunce. Finally, the Brown boys, Jackie and Bubba, added the other dimensions to this crushing attack which netted 634 yards total offense-they romped through the San Jose defense for a combined 150 yards in 22 carries. Placekicker Steve (the Heel) Horowitz showed promise of things to come by booting through nine consecutive PAT's without a miss. Yet someone had to get the ball for the offense; someone had to set up all these heroics. San Jose could only scratch out 43 yards rushing the entire game, and then there was poor, poor Ivan Lippi. The Down Four of Bill Alexander, Tim McClure, Pete Lazetich, and Dave Tipton (average weight - 225) terrorized the SJS quarterback, sacking him behind the line seven times in giving him minus 34 yards rushing. Ivan the Intimidated was able to complete only 14 of 33 passes, or 11 if you don't count the three interceptions. So completely did the defense stop San Jose that on six separate occasions the offensive unit began its thrust inside Spartan territory, and five of these drives led to touchdowns. Like Molasses in Winter, the Tribe was slow in getting started the next week against Oregon. When the wheels finally began to move, the engineer was Howie Williams. The small fullback carried the ball 17 times for 101 yards in the first half, almost all of his total of 108 for the game. Thirty-nine of these yards came on Stanford's only scoring drive of the half, a 68-yard spurt capped by a strike from Plunkett to Bob Moore in the corner of the end zone. Stanford took this slim seven-point margin into the third quarter, when the Indians raced down the field to score in six plays after the kickoff. The play that Coach Ralston chose as the game's turning-point was a 45-yard bomb from Plunkett to flanker Randy Vataha for the touchdown. Oregon, meanwhile, was still unable to move. Their fine quarterback Tom Blanchard completed 20 of 34 passes for 175 yards, but could neither complete a long bomb nor put any points on the scoreboard. The defensive backfield of Jim Kauffman, Dick Oliver, and Rich Keller put the wraps on the deep Oregon receivers, and held all-Coast Duck Bob Moore to four catches. While Blanchard was waiting for his deep receivers to get open, the Tribe's defensive line was not. Blanchard was dropped by them six times in totalling minus 32 yards rushing. Linebacker Parish contributed seventeen tackles to the effort, which held Oregon to 30 total yards on the ground. 240 fBottom right) This was the story all day. Oregon gained only 30 yards on the ground and only two first downs rushing. The chains show first down, Stanford. (Left and below) Fullback Howie Williams just eludes a tackier after taking a handoff from Plunkett. Against Oregon, Williams carried 20 times for 108 yards, his finest game of the season. He was the Pac-8's only running back to rank in the top ten in both rushing and receiving. Ivan the Intimidated tosses another one up in the air. Odds are that it didn't reach friendly hands; only one out of every three the SJS quarterback threw could claim that distinction. Rushing in to observe technique are Don Parish (90) and Wade Killefer (59). (Opposite page) Jim Plunkett flings an aerial against San Jose. The junior quarterback completed 13 of 15 for 221 yards and two touchdowns, partially because he had blocking like this. Providing the protection are Pete Seymour (71), George Crooks (67), John Sande (55), Bob Reinhard (69), Ron Kadziel (87),andBubba Brown (21) 241 (Bottom) Purdue halfback Randy Cooper shifts gears as Jack Schultz (44), Rich Keller (24) and Jeff Siemon (92) move in. Cooper was the leading Purdue rusher for the game, with 57 yards in 13 carries. 242 Two Undefeated teams met in Lafeyette, Indiana on October 4. Both Stanford and Purdue were nationally ranked, with Purdue among the country's ten best teams. Yet the contest was almost overshadowed by the duel between the nation's two best junior drop-back quarterbacks: the Indians' Plunkett and the Boilermakers' Mike Phipps. Purdue pushed over its final score in the closing minutes for a 36-35 victory, and the game was every bit as close as the score might indicate. Stanford got on the scoreboard first, after Dave Alexander dumped Phipps on his own 10 yard-line and Purdue was forced to punt. From the Purdue 40, Plunkett went to tight end Bob Moore twice before Williams bucked over from the two for the score. A little over a minute later, it was 7-7, and the Tribe took over on its own 20. A 47-yard heave from Plunkett to Vataha put Stanford on the Purdue 15 four plays later. From there, the lanky Mexican-American quarterback sent Williams out of the backfield before floating a TD pass to his fullback. To Stanford fans craning their ears towards a radio in Palo Alto, it seemed that Stanford was having to grind out their points, while Phipps read the Stanford defense with ease and marched down the field to score almost at will. If the Tribe lost momentum. . . Enough of that. Six plays and 64 yards later, the score was 14-14. It would take perfect football to maintain the lead, and that is some chore for any team. A fumble gave the Boilermakers the ball on the Stanford 17, and sure enough, Phipps led 21-14. Time was running out in the first half, so Plunkett took to the air, completing five of seven passes in the next drive. First Demea Washington dragged one in to move the squad to the Stanford 46. After a draw to Williams, Plunkett threw to Lasater twice and Williams once before finding Bob Moore on the other end of a 12-yarder for the touchdown. This momentum lasted into the second half, as Stanford came out of the locker room to blitz Purdue for 14 quick points. Miles Moore returned the opening kickoff 41 yards before Plunkett caught Bob Moore for 22, Lasater for 21, and Moore again for 10 yards and the payoff. It seemed as though Purdue had stalled. Unable to move, they punted to the Stanford nine yard-line. Plunkett was as hot on this drive as he had been all afternoon. After a 34-yarder to halfback Bubba Brown, he had room to operate; the Tribe playmaker mixed up the draw to Brown and the slashing off-tackle runs of Williams effectively, ending the drive with a bullet to tight end Ron Kadziel for a 35-21 advantage. This bulge lasted through the third quarter. At that time, Plunkett had thrown for 100 yards more than Phipps and one more touchdown. But Phipps began an incredible string of thirteen consecutive completions that help to explain why he finished second in the Heisman trophy balloting. Three of these sufficed to close the gap to seven points; the Boilermakers got another big psychological lift when a Stanford drive stalled on the Purdue seven and the ensuing field goal attempt fell wide of the mark. With 3:03 to go, Phipps had another chance; he lofted a 65-yard bomb on a first down play before dropping back to throw again on first down, this time for fourteen yards and six points. It was 35-34. Would Purdue settle for the tie or go for the two-point conversion? You know the story. When Phipps lined up behind his center, the fans packing Ross-Ade Staduim went wild. An amazing cross-body, 45-degree pass connected for the two. capping a great comeback to a 36-35 advantage. Two opportunities slipped through the Tribe's fingers in the final seconds, as a fumble and an interception killed two different drives. The first heartbreaker of three for the Indians in 1969 was the hardest to take, but almost no one could be faulted. In the end it was Phipps' excellence rather than a Stanford weakness that caused the defeat. The Purdue All-American overshadowed his Stanford counterpart by setting school records with an incredible 28 completions in 39 attempts for 429 yards and five touchdowns. The difference between the two quarterbacks in total yards, though, was a paltry eight yards. Plunkett dashed for 61 yards when he wasn't peppering the Purdue defense for 255 yards through the air, garnered on 23 completions in 46 throws for four touchdowns. A runner-up effort? Hardly; it set a new Pac-8 record for single-game total offense. It's not over yet-Jim and the boys get a rematch next year. Vataha, known for his leaping catches in 1969, is hit as he nabs a 47-yard pass from Plunkett. Bob Moore (86) stands ready to lend a hand. 243 The Greatest Game Still, Stanford couldn't complain. Plunkett drove the Indians to the SC 36-yard line, where two interference calls on passes intended for flanker Jack Lasater moved the ball down to the one. Bubba Brown soared over on a play called 22-jump, and Stanford had a one point margin. What ensued was an amazing one-man show. Clarence Davis carried the ball single-handedly from the SC 37 yard-line to the Stanford 21 in seven plays. Placekicker Ron Ayala put USC ahead by two, 23-21, after the drive had bogged down at the Stanford 13. On the 50 yards the drive covered, Clarence Davis covered 49. What do you do when you're down by two with 3:23 to go to the nation's fourth-ranked team? The same thing that this team would go on to do all year—come right back. Plunkett lofted a 67-yard bomb that Randy Vataha hauled down, stealing it right out of the hands of SC cornerback Sandy Durko. With a fourth down situation at the 19-yard-line, Steve Horowitz ran onto the field. Thousands of people froze in anticipation, their hands over their heads and their fingers crossed. The 37-yard three-pointer landed gently between the goalposts, and Stanford exploded. With :55 to go, the Tribe had a commanding 24-23 lead. Over and over the Stanford rooters screamed, Horowitz, we love you! across the field at the ecstatic number 56. A small boy in the Stanford rooting section jumped up and down, joining the chant, and several students extended paternalistic hands to pat his head with pride. What do you do when you're down by a point with :55 to go and you are the nation's fourth-ranked team? You guessed it. The Trojans ran an incredible nine plays in that time, and Stanford's prevent defense gave up yardage in chunks of 11, 17, and 28. The clock was stopped to move the chains after Jones threw for a first down on the Stanford 17, and Ron Ayala rushed onto the filed. With no time left, Ayala's field goal attempt soared into the black night and cleared the crossbar by four feet. Pandemonium broke loose, and all of Los Angeles swarmed onto the field. Stanford fans stood transfixed. No one moved for ten minutes as Trojan fans threw taunts from the field. Somewhere a little boy cried. Somewhere a hand reached down to pat his head. A voice whispered in his ear. Next year. ever played in collegiate football? However one rates it, each of the 82,812 fanatics that crowded the Los Angeles Coliseum stayed until the final gun in the Stanford-USC cliffhanger—then half of them exploded into a frenzied, delirious ecstasy. The other half stood by their seats, expressionless and motionless, watching the victors swarm onto the field and claim the spoils; they had come over four hundred miles only to see the reward snatched from their mouths by two seconds. Make no mistake about it: whatever is said in this article, the final score was USC 26, Stanford 24. But somehow that seems so callous a thing to say ... The contest began inauspiciously. Both teams fumbled in their opening series, and Trojan signal-caller Jimmy Jones threw an interception to Pat Preston on the second series, with the Stanford linebacker returning it to the USC fifteen. Plunkett rifled a pass to Lasater for 11, and then fired a three-yard scoring strike to tight end Bob Moore. Just after the Trojans had blocked a 24-yard field goal attempt by Steve Horowitz, Clarence Davis fumbled and again Stanford had a first down in Trojan territory. Again the Tribe capitalized, with Howie Williams crashing in after grabbing a pass from Plunkett at the four. For the second time the conversion failed, and it was 12-0. Unfortunately, breaks don't go one way forever. In one brief period of one minute and two seconds, USC scored twice, aided by a dropped punt and a 57-yard interception runback. At the half Stanford trailed, 14-12. When the teams came back on the field, the excitement began to mount. Defensive back Rick Keller intercepted a Jimmy Jones pass, and Plunkett threw to Demea Washington, Bob Moore, and Williams for first downs. Horowitz arched a 28-yard field goal, and again the lead changed hands. USC now began to go more to speedy tailback Clarence Davis, and number 28 was looking more like 32, a memory that Stanford would have been glad to forget. Davis carried the ball in six of the next eleven plays, the eleventh being nineteen yards through the air for the touchdown. 244 Believe it or not, somehow SC quarterback Jimmy Jones got his arm moving forward before Kiliefer (59) hit him. The pass was ruled incomplete. Right guard Jody Graves (65) gets way up to block the attempt. (Left) Trojan tailback Clarence Davis gives sophomore defensive end Jeff Siemon the Evil Eye. The number one running back in the Pac-8 carried the ball 39 times for 198 yards. (Opposite) Williams again, this time for twelve yards against USC. Although Southern Cal's Wild Bunch contained the Indians well on the ground, Williams caught seven passes for 68 yards. 245 (Bottom) Clarence Davis cuts artfully behind his blocker while Mike Ewing (34) fends off the attacker and Parish (90) and Siemon (92) scramble. The scoreboard tells the story as two Stanford gridders show hov it might have ended. 0 55 QUARTER I 2 3 4 TOTAL STANFORD S G 3 9 24 U S.C 0 14 6 3 23 USC BALL ON I 5 YARD LINE I DGUN I 0 YARDS TO GO FIRST DOWNS USC 19 SU 22 ATTENDANCE 82 812 246 (Left) Safety Jim Kauffman reaches in to break up this pass intended for WSU flanker Johnny Davis. Kauffman was named to the UPl's All-Coast second team. Jack Lasater takes a 37-yarder from Jim Plunkett to put Stanford in the lead, 7-0. Sideback Lionel Thomas provides futile opposition. Jack caught six others as well, covering 114 yards. The Best .500 Team in the nation hosted Washington State after dropping last-second games to Purdue and USC the previous two weeks. It would be reasonable to expect a team to let down after seeing its Rose Bowl hopes crushed, but the Indians bounced back after a slow first quarter start to dismantle WSU, 49-0. The heroes of this one were many, but Don Bunce stands out. Plunkett had completed 13 of 23 for 164 yards and a touchdown before departing and the game was out of reach by the time the junior quarterback got rolling, but someone forgot to tell him. The nation's best second-string quarterback ran like a man possessed, moving for 129 yards in 13 carries including slabs of 24. 45, and 43 yards (the last for a touchdown). When he got tired, Bunce sat back and pitched nine passes for five completions, 80 yards, and a touchdown to tight-end Ron Kadziel. For his efforts, Bunce received, the Back of the Game award, a richly-deserved commendation. Flanker Jack Lasater was the prime beneficiary of Bunce's aerials, and caught seven passes over the course of the afternoon for 114 yards and a touchdown. Lasater, too, was enjoying his finest game of the year, and was rewarded with Lineman of the Game honors. The first two completions Stanford threw against WSU covered 20 yards. There is nothing surprising about this except that with these two passes the Indians compiled more yards through the air than WSU did all afternoon. Aided by a plethora of poor quarterbacks, the secondary held the Cougars to 18 yards via the forward pass. Eleven passes attempted in the second half fell incomplete; only one was caught, and that by Stanford's all Pac-8 back Rich Keller, who ran it back 56 yards for a touchdown. In a way, he was only mimicking Don Parish, who pulled a stray pass down in the first half and converted into another quick six for the Tribe. To state it another way: the defense trounced the Cougars, 12-0-Bunce was pure gravy. 247 Diminutive flanker Randy Vataha (18) makes an incredible catch against UCLA fora touchdown. UCLA safety Dennis Spurting (27) is helpless as he watches Stanford take a 14-6 lead on the 28-yard completion. 248 Defensive tackle Bill Alexander (72) looks as though he just now spotted UCLA quarterback Dennis Dummit, and is thinking about what he should do. He did it, and Dummit was dumped for a loss of five. Rose Bowl Hopes were high for the Westwooders as they came to the Farm with a 6-0 record. Even if that record had been built against some of the weakest teams in the country, UCLA manpower was awesome. There were individual battles, too: Jim Plunkett against Dennis Dummit for the best quarterback on the coast, and Don Parish against Mike (Cat) Ballou for the best linebacker on the coast, to name just two. Dummit had thrown the ball with virtually the same percentage of completions and for the same number of yards as Plunkett, while halfback Greg Jones and fullback Mickey Cureton were providing the best one-two rushing punch in the league. Dummit went to his running backs early. On the first set of downs, the two backs sprinted for 43 yards and Dummit took it the last three for the the touchdown. It marked the first time Stanford had been scored against in the first quarter. Zenon Andrusyshyn missed the important extra point. Plunkett tried the other route to the goal, and completed his first four passes. Vataha took a 14-yarder on the one and ran it in for the score. When Greg Jones fumbled late in the quarter, Plunkett gave the ball to Bubba Brown for 18 yards and threw for 11 to Lasater before hurling another touchdown pass to Vataha, who made an acrobatic leap to catch the pass high in the air. UCLA was unable to move the ball, and Keller's interception of a Dummit pass put the Indians in excellent field position on the Bruin 16 yard-line. Horowitz made it 17-6 with a 30-yard field goal from there. The statistics at the half, though, were a lot closer than the score. It was only a question of when UCLA would begin to pile up the points. A Bruin interception early in the third quarter was followed by Dummit's second touchdown run, cutting the Indian margin to 17-13. Even this would not stand long. UCLA got the ball back immediately and marched from their own 20 down to the Stanford one yard-line, with Cureton and Jones ripping off chunks of yardage and Dummit hitting three consecutive passes before sneaking over for his third touchdown. Trailing 20-17, the long-lethargic Tribe rose from its torpor. Plunkett his Vataha for 38 yards and just overthrew two receivers on the goal line. Horowitz split the uprights from 27 yards out to knot the game at 20-20. In the next ten minutes, the game went back and forth. UCLA had an opportunity when it drove to the 8-yard line, but Andrusyshyn missed a field goal change from there. Stanford took over with 1:12 to go, and Plunkett put the ball into the air seven consecutive times to move the Indians to the Bruin 15. Once of these had been a 26-yard pass to Vataha in the end zone. Vataha had two steps on his defensive man; the pass was thrown long, and the diving flanker bobbted it twice before it fell to the ground. With four seconds left, Horowitz sighted in a field goal from 27 yards out, but Vince Bischof broke through from the 'weak side rush and blocked the attempt. UCLA went on to lose to USC for the Rose Bowl bid, but Stanford had shown again that it would not fold under pressure against one of the nation's best teams. Both Plunkett and Dummit had excellent days. Dummit connected on 17 of 28 for 228 yards, while Plunkett rolled up 263 yards and two touchdowns (both to Vataha) by completing 26 of 44 tosses. Don Parish anchored the defense by making 17 tackles, many of which kept Cureton and Jones from breaking away and showed that he deserved the All-America status accorded him at the season's end. As Coach Ralston put it, We won a lot of individual battles, but we didn't win the game. 249 This play is called 22-Jump. Can you understand v hy? A Comedy of Errors kept the trip to Corvallis from being any kind of test for the Tribe, as Stanford shut out its third straight Northwestern team of the year, 33-0. Oregon State was intercepted four times and lost possession of six fumbles during the game; the Indians' first seventeen points were set up by OSU mishaps, and the game was out of reach before Stanford had a chance to earn anything. The visitors rolled up 493 total yards, as Jim Plunkett hit 15 of 25 for 191 yards and a touchdown before leaving in the third period. The touchdown gave Plunkett the all-time Stanford touchdown pass record with 29. Don Bunce came in to pass for 72 and lead the rushers with 49 yards gained. The rest of the attack was well-balanced. Bubba Brown gained 44 yards on ten carries, Williams ground out 42 with one touchdown, and reserve back Jackie Brown and Hillary Shockley totalled 77 yards and a score. Steve Endicott would say the emphasis was being misplaced. The Beaver quarterback saw the ground coming up fast seven different times, the result of a ferocious pass rush put up by the first line of Stanford's defense. Dennis Moore and Jeff Siemon got to him first, to be followed by Moore again, Terrell Smith, Wade Killefer, and sophomore guard Dave Grossi (twice on successive plays). One sequence was particularly embarrassing. With the ball on his own twenty, Endicott faded back only to be hit by Smith on the fourteen. On the next play, tackle Wade Killefer chased the Beaver signal-caller all the way back to the goal line before nailing him in the end zone for a two-point safety. All in all, Endicott rushed for minus 65 yards while OSU as a team made only fourteen yards. Stanford's own ABM kept Oregon contained through the air as well. Miles Moore intercepted two passes, running one back 55 yards for a score that was subsequently nullified, while Phil Satre and Jack Schultz each captured one. Schultz's catch and 21-yard return set up a 41-yard field goal by Steve Horowitz. Next week Stanford went for a shutout sweep of the Northwest teams against Washington. Penalties and uninspired play characterized a game which should have been a laugher. The winless, depressed, and divided Washington Huskies gave the nation's twelfth-ranked team all it could handle. The Indians managed to sneak past the officials for three scores on the cold, blustery Washington Saturday, but the men in black and white retaliated by levying the Tribe with 147 yards in penalties. The Cards sloshed around for most of the first quarter before a Washington fumble set them up at the mid-field stripe. Consecutive passes to Vataha, Williams, and Bubba Brown yielded 54 yards, and Plunkett waded in for the score and the early lead. Amazing as it may seem, the Huskies rallied momentarily, following an interception and pass interference call the latter covering 38 yards, to effect a deadlock. This was merely transitory, though, as Plunkett hit Lasater, Vataha, and Bob Moore for big gains before finding Vataha again in the end zone for 28 yards and six points. This provided the halftime bulge, which was incremented near the end of the fourth quarter by the best Stanford drive of the day. Plunkett hit four of five aerials in the 67-yard drive that concluded the scoring, three of which went to Bob Moore. The all-Coast tight end pulled in a total of 8 passes that afternoon for 111 yards,one of his finest days of the season. And Plunkett received Back of the Game honors again for the n-th time of the year, completing 24 of 35 for 323 yards. It would take next week's game against the Air Force to get the Indians back off the ground. 250 The second and third biggest ground-gainers grind on: (Below) sophomore Jackie Brown, a sure starter in 1970, gets torque on Astroturf; (Opposite page) Howie Williams running scared against OSU. AA j� 251 (Below) Falcon Tailback Curtis Martin, v ho averaged 5.2 yards per carry against the Tribe, is hit hard and fumbles, killing a late Air Force drive. (Right) the strength of Jim Plunkett is illustrated here. The 6'3 , 203-pound quarterback staves off two Academy aggressors on the way to completing 22 of 38 for 278 yards. 252 This bizarre dance ended with Gary Baxter, the AF quarterback, on the ground. Applying the proper leverage are Tim McClure (51), Don Parish (90), and Wade Killefer (59). Moratorium Day in November saw the Air Force marching into Palo Alto to contend with Stanford's first-strike capability. The Falcons hoped to achieve a stalemate through the high-powered bombs and scrambling ability of their quarterback Gary Spider Baxter, but the end of the holocaust was accomplished with the Indians on top, 47-34. It took the Tribe a while to shake off the effects of a sloppy game in Seattle the week before; Air Force, on the other hand, marched easily to score in its second series of the game. The,Indians came right back, though, and moved from its own 34 to the Air Force 23 on a Plunkett keeper and a pitchout on the quarterback option to Howie Williams. Plunkett used this play nine times in the first half for an average gain of ten yards per carry. The quarterback would roll out short to the right while his running back would sweep outside. If the defensive end came at Plunkett, he would unload the ball to the back; if he went for the back, Plunkett would keep and cut inside for big yardage. This first drive culminated in a 23-yard halfback pass to Vataha for the score, with the flanker circling back between two defenders to snag the underthrown pass. Air Force marched right back, sustaining a 75-yard drive to take the lead in the see-saw battle, before Stanford began to move again. Four quarterback options-a keeper, a pitch to Bubba Brown, and two to sophomore Hillary Shockley set up a field goal by Horowitz. The Falcon thrust stalled, and more options combined with an interception by Schultz led to Stanford scores, with Shockley crashing over both times to give the Tribe a 24-14 lead before an Air (Left) Steve Horowitz puts one up for three. Horowitz kicked 10 of 19 field goal attempts to establish a new school record v hile placing fifth nationally in kick-scoring. (Belov ) Baxter gets sacked again by Killefer (59). Force field goal cut the halftime margin to seven. Still, it was not to be until midway through the fourth quarter that the Indians would be able to break the game open. The Falcons sped right down for a touchdown in the second half to knot the score. With the surety of a Pavlovian dog, the Stanfords trotted down the field again in response to this stimulus, regaining the lead after three great catches by tight end Ron Kadziel and a ten-yard pass to paydirt, Plunkett to Bubba Brown. A crucial set of downs followed for Air Force. With first and goal and the Stanford ten, Wade Killefer broke through three times in four plays to nab Baxter for losses. With a fourth down at the Tribe 28, the Falcons had to settle for a 45-yard field goal-arid this was nullified in a smoot ' effort of one-upsmanship, Steve Horowitz's 46-yarder only two minutes later. This made the score 34-27. and the precarious Stanford edge held for several minutes, until Vataha made a phenomenal 63-yard punt return for a touchdown that put the game under wraps. For this run and his other touchdown catch, Vataha was honored with the Lineman of the Game award. This sensational effort was shortly followed by an 85-yard drive for seven more points. Shockley ran for 24 of the yards and caught a 15-yard toss for the score, his third of the game. Safety Tom Sones single-handedly held off the Falcon attack for the rest of the game, stopping consecutive drives inside the Stanford thirty with timely interceptions. Back of the Game Plunkett his on 22 of 38 attempts for 278 yards and two touchdowns. Some of the permanent honor he deserves came to him in this game, as he smashed three single-season Pac-8 marks: most touchdown passes, most passing yards, and most yards total offense. 253 Two-Touchdown Favorites in a Big Game? Forget it. This annual classic has a way of making the oddsmakers eat their shorts. This time it was no different. All the ingredients were there: the bonfire rally on the eve of the game drew close to 10,000 people; a Cal airplane had leafleted the campus with propaganda; UGLY had succumbed to an invasion by the band and its inimitable leader; and the Zetes had beaten Cal for the Big Game IM title. Still, the big one is decided on the field, and decided it appeared to be, as with six minutes to go in the first quarter the red and white had raced to a 17-0 advantage. The first seven came on a 47-yard aerial to Howie Williams coming out of the backfield, on the play following a seventeen-yard gain by Bubba Brown on the same pattern. Five plays later. Cal fumbled, the first of four times that the Indians would recover Bear fumbles. In this way. Cal drives would halt on the Stanford 7, 23, and 33 yard-lines, while a fumble on their own 19 would lead to a Tribe score. In seconds. Jack Lasater had dragged in a bomb from Plunkett, broken a tackle, and galloped in for the score in a 72-yard play. Once again the Bears could not hold the football, and Steve Horowitz blasted through the first of his three field goals. At this point the oddsmakers in the Press Box turned to each other, smiled, and switched on the USC-UCLA game. But Dave Penhall didn't see the scoreboard. He couldn't have. For instead of settling back to play football, the Cal quarterback led the Bears to back-to-back touchdowns. The Indians got Horowitz close enough to engineer two more field goals for a 23-14 lead just into the fourth quarter, but that was all for the Tribe for a while. Enter Penhall, scrambling. A 55-yard pitch down the sideline sandwiched between two completions to split end Geoff DeLapp, and the Bears were sitting on the Stanford yard-line. Penhall took it in from there, and the lead was cut to two. A word on DeLapp. The end had caught only twelve passes coming into the game and did not rank among Cal's leading receivers, but flagged down another twelve against the Indians for 115 yards and ''Lineman of the Game honors. Then a big break came to the Bears. Plunkett threw his third interception, and Cal owned the football on the 44 of Stanford. In two plays, Penhall and a 28-23 lead. It had been a courageous comeback. Penhall had been throwing completions at will, and the Indian offense had been hibernating since the first quarter. Plunkett, on fire in the first half, cooled off considerably, such that the Indian attack through the air was no longer reliable. Ralston wisely stayed on the ground, and a team which had battled back many times only to suffer heartbreak began to try one more time. From the Stanford 20, nine of the next eleven plays went to one of the two running backs; Williams took the ball into the end zone from four yards out on his last collegiate carry. Stanford had finally won a close one, 29-28, as Reinhard's 56-yard punt from his own end-zone and double coverage that made Penhall's last three bombs fall incomplete staved off the Bears in the final four minutes. Maybe the day was Penhall's. The Back of the Game completed an astounding 23 of 36 for 321 yards, passing for one touchdown and running for two more. But possibly the day was Stanford's, not in the sense that they won as expected, but in that they were tough when they were down, when it was crucial to be tough. What is more, they were tough in an area other than their forte. The pass would not work in the crucial drive-it would have to be on the ground. And so it was. The ability of this team to struggle back and to use its own limitations as assets made it one of the best ten teams in the nation, far better than its 7-2-1 record would indicate. Fifteen seniors saw their last collegiate action; they will be absent when the 1970 squad fulfills their dream-the Rose Bowl. The are: Bob Brown, Bubba Brown, George Crooks, Jim Cross, Ron Fujikawa, Rich Keller, Dick Oliver, Don Parish, Brian Porter, Pat Preston, Bob Reinhard, Pete Seymour, Dave Sharp. Terrell Smith, and Howie Williams. 254 (Left) Cal's all-coast defensive end Irby Augustine puts the squeeze on Williams as the Indians drive early in the hectic fourth quarter. This drive culminated in a field goal which put the Indians at a 23-14 advantage. Cal quarterback Dave Penhall's great protection was broken only once, by Terrell Smith for a loss of ten. Penhall had a brilliant day against the Indians, completing 23 of 36 for 321 yards. Jim Kauffman (23) picks off a pass as Dick Oliver (29) hustles to provide blocking. Kauffman tied for the team lead in interceptions with three and in punt returns with thirteen. 255 The Cruel Specter of injury hung continuously over the 1969 varsity water polo team, each starter being forced out of the lineup for one or more matches. Team hopes for a shot at the national crown were finally dashed when two of the three starting seniors, expected to provide stability to an otherwise inexperienced team, were forced out of action for the entire second half of the season. These two seniors were captain Tom Hill, last year's MVP and high scorer (sidelined after an appendectomy) and Sarge Wilson (.victimized by a badly broken nose). These injuries forced Coach Jim Gaughran to field a team composed entirely of sophomores and juniors in the season's final six games, two of which were squeakers dropped to USC and UCLA. Considering these problems, the poloists' 11-8 mark was a considerable accomplishment, and included early-season triumphs over such nationally-ranked teams as Cal, UC Irvine, and DeAnza. In fact, the season commenced auspiciously, as the varsity rolled to nine victories in its first twelve matches. This streak encompassed a second-place finish in the Irvine Invitational in late September; yet after that tournament. Hill and Wilson were struck down by injuries, and the Indians would never again field their entire starting lineup. With all of the players who started the last six games returning next year. Coach Gaughran is anticipating a place in the NCAA championship berths. Among these starters. All Pac-8 field man Rick Massimino stood out. Massimino paced the varsity in scoring and ably substituted as the team leader when Hill was injured. Joining Massimino will be second team Pac-8 selection Rob Woolley and goalie Pete Gadd. These players were all sophpmores this year, as were nine of the team's sixteen members; they will form the nucleus of Stanford's water polo squad for the next two years. Additionally, both Dan Powlinson, leading scorer for the frosh, and frosh captain Bob Warren should provide additional scoring punch for 1970. 256 (Opposite) Sarge Wilson strains for a pass against UCLA. Wilson missed half the season after suffering a broken nose, one of several injuries that left the Indians severely crippled. (Below) Frosh poloist Steve Watkins fires one past the Santa Ana goalie for a tally; Watkins won the Most Improved Player award this year. (Bottom) Rob Woolley, a second team All Pac-8 choice, slings one over a UCLA defender. The Bruins swept a pair from Stanford in 1969, drowning the Tribe 10-5 and 8 2. (Below) This one's not as easy to call as the last one. Varsity field man Bob Rogers gives the USC goalie a little practice. He didn't get enough—Stanford lost. 257 (Belov ) Lans Lau provides instep against West Valley as Hunt Deming, Alan Houghton, and a surprised defender ogle. Forward Hunt Deming maneuvers through an obstacle course en Bewhiskered center forward Chip Jessup, MVP and high scorer for route to the West Valley goal. Crushing block by Ben White. the second consecutive year, hustles past a West Valley defender 258 Only by a Hair did the Tribe's varsity soccer team escape a third consecutive losing season. Yet the team's 7-7 record in no way reflects the tremendous improvement from last year; the 1969 edition not only bettered its predecessor's 4-10 record, but scored twice as many goals in giving up only half as many enemy tallies as last year. Early in the year, the inexperience that was a factor in all 1969 fall sports except football caused the young team to post inconsistent efforts. As the season matured, so did the players, and the varsity booters enjoyed a four-game winning streak before suffering a disappointing 2-1 setback at the hands of Santa Clara in double overtime. Stanford rebounded in soccer's version of the Big Game, however, to upset Cal, 2-0; the Bears had been ranked fifth on the coast before being decisively scalped. Stanford plays its soccer in the tough Pacific Coast league, an amalgamation of teams from the San Francisco area. Both the University of San Francisco and San Jose State bettered the Indians' .500 record, with USF ranking second in the country at the season's end. The Tribe landed Linus Lau on the All-League forward line, while Ben White was lauded as an Honorable Mention selection on defense. Center forward Chip Jessup took MVP and high-scoring honors for the second consecutive year, ramming fourteen goals past diving enemy goalies. The coaches honored the deserving Ron Bannerman with the Most Improved Player Award. One of the main reasons for the transformation that occurred in this year's team was the addition of Juan Toplatch to the coaching staff. Toplatch, the seasoned coach of the Oakland Clippers, did an outstanding job building the skills of the players and inspiring confidence in the young group. The stage is set for a winning season, the first in four years. F.nt row: Al Petersen, Linus Lau, Wing Leung. Sam Casey. Paul Raymore, Gary Cook, John Ridddl. AJ Houghton Ocmming. Doug Patt. Kevin Quist, John Bodin. Ron Bannerman. Frank Shafroth, Ben White. Mark Smith. Dennis' £ u£; Second row: Woody Hagge, Hunt McMullen. Coach Toplatch, Head Coach Priddlc 259 (Bdovv, kneeling) Arvid Kretz. Robert Coe, Jack Lawson Chuck rw ChuS Menfn8n M',,ch,acdl' °ecker Undcrswod. Don Kardong. Greg Brik! The Harried Harriers might be an apt description of the 1969 cross country team. Grueling workouts characterized the second year of Coach Marshall Clark, as the team's mentor strove to create teamwork, to foster a group effort. It's hard to argue with the results. Last year, an extremely talented squad led by All-Americans Brook Thomas and Greg Brock finished second in the NCAA championships. This year Thomas was gone, and the emphasis was shifted to balance. Still, there were individual highlights. Greg Brock shattered course records several times during the year, but established himself as the best distance runner in Stanford history with a fifth-place finish in the Pac-8 meet (behind Lindgren and Prefontaine) and a ninth in the NCAA. Surprising freshman Decker Underwood stirred hopes of things to come in that Pac-8 meet, aiding the Indians' third-place finish with his best effort of the season, a 16th that eclipsed the old course mark. Bob Coe, a sophomore, capped a strong season with a third in the Sacramento Invitational. The Tribe was 3-1 in dual meets, crushing a strong USC squad and dropping a one-point heartbreaker to UCLA before running over San Jose State and Cal. That final meet saw 1969 co-captain Chuck Menz and 1970 captain Don Kardong finish in a dead heat for first place (cross-country has its melodrama too!). Menz and Brock will graduate, and the depth and unity that Coach Clark has worked so hard to nurture will have to be the answer. Kardong, Coe, and Underwood will be back, supplemented by injury-prone Arvid Kretz and Jack Lawson; with a little luck they will be vying with Oregon for the title in the fall. 260 Cal's Bob Walden is the only Bear among all the Indians. Close behind are Greg Brock Don Kardong, former captain Brook Thomas, Chuck Mem, Arvid Kretz, and Robert Coe. Kardong and Menz finished in a dead heat for first. 261 The Worst basketball team in the Pac-8 Conference this year could manage only two triumphs in fourteen league contests. The 5-20 overall record of the inept Indians was the poorest compiled by any Stanford basketball team since the 1916 Whiz Kids put together a 2-9 record and basketball was officially declared a major sport at Stanford. Maybe they had the right idea in 1915. There were certainly deficiencies. For the third consecutive year, the team was without a big man in the middle for most of the season. Senior center Bill Palmer, at 6'7 , was giving away several inches to almost all of his opponents, yet even he towered over his 6'4 teammates in the forecourt. Chuck Moore and Fred Green. In several games the Cards dropped contests by squandering big halftime leads when the outside shooting they relied so heavily upon would cool off, and their inability to move inside became apparent. Second, the squad was slow as well. These two deficiencies simplified the possible game plans-ball control, run-and-shoot, and aggressive defense were all out. The resulting melange was interesting. On offense, the guards would walk the ball upcourt all too often; on defense, there was no press. No wonder that by the end of the season. Athletic Department press releases centered on the band and the pom pon girls rather than the games. It would be unfair to say there were no bright spots. Claude Terry established himself as the hottest-shooting sophomore on the West Coast by netting 19.6 points per game to lead the team and earn himself a berth on the All NorCal team. His backcourt partner Dennis O'Neill averaged 16.6 to round out the Indian scoring threat, while Captain Bill Palmer placed among the conference leaders in rebounds. The team had its moments, too. Two of the best games were squeakers dropped to nationally-ranked Utah (94-96) and USC (68-71), while two of the most satisfying were upset scalpings of California (73-71) and Oregon State (71-69). A building year? Not really... The tallest starter on a fine freshman team (12-4) was only 6'4 . Next year will be another long one for the Cards. 262 They didn't all come as easily as this. The Bruins had all their starters in double figures in the 102-84 rout (Left) Seven-foot Vic Bartolome, the nation's leader in field goal percentage, doesn't encounter too much opposition in the stratosphere. 263 UCLA's 6'9 Steve Patterson was one of many big men who towered over Bill Palmer this year, causing Excedrin headaches numbers 22, 32, 44, 55... (Right) Claude Terry from the corner over an Air Force defender. Terry's 26points came on 11 for 15 from the floor. 264 Hopes Were High for Stanford basketball this year after an unexpectedly strong showing by the Tribe against nationally-ranked Utah. Netting fifteen more field goals than the Utes, the Redmen blew the game at the foul line, a proclivity that would haunt them all year, to fall 96-94. The hopes stayed up there for just two more games, as the Indians trounced SJS before bowing to WCAC champ Santa Clara. From there it went downhill, a trend slowed only four more times during the season. One of these occasions was the Kodak Classic, in which Stanford took the runner-up spot by knocking over Rochester, 114-78, on the way to a new tournament scoring record. Captain Bill Palmer canned 19 points, his season high, while sharpshooting sophomore Claude Terry added 26 to the cause. Sporting a 2-7 mark, Stanford opened Pac-8 Conference play against Washington. Down by five in the closing minutes, the Cards rushed back to knot the score at the buzzer on a shot by Fred Green. The effort was wasted in overtime, as Washington got hot and never looked back in winning, 76-73. Not until their third league tilt could Stanford chalk up a win. Even that one was a cliffhanger. On the strength of Claude Terry's 13 points, the Indians rolled to a 44-34 halftime edge. Palmer was especially effective in screening Cal's 6'9 Ansley Truitt from the boards and managing to grab seven rebounds himself. But Cal came roaring back in the second half with Truitt pouring through fifteen in that period. The lead changed hands several times in the final minutes until Cal guard Charlie Johnson grabbed a rebound and put it in for a 71-69 edge. The Indians worked the ball around for a good shot until Terry hit a 13-footer with :31 to go, then deflected a Cal pass to Tribe forward Chuck Moore. Moore fired to guard Dennis O'Neill, who was fouled on a drive with one second on the clock. O'Neill calmly sank both charities for the 73-71 triumph. Two intersectional battles ensued. The Indians being shot down by the Wyoming Cowboys before bombing Air Force, 90-69. O'Neill carried the club against Wyoming, firing for 35 points, while Moore ripped 20 rebounds to set a Pavilion record. Stan Dodds was the big gun for the Cowboys with 36 points, including 9 of 13 from the floor in the first half. Against Air Force everyone was hot; Stanford hit an incredible 64% from the floor in running away from the Falcons. Terry rebounded from a poor showing against Wyoming to tank 11 of 15 shots from the field for a total of 26 points. The next weekend was a tragedy, as USC and national champion UCLA invaded Roscoe Maples. USC held a small lead throughout the game until O'Neill hit both ends of a one-and-one to give Stanford a 64-63 lead. With under a minute to go the Indians still led by two, but USC guard Paul Westphal stole the ball, got a layup and was fouled in a three-point play. Chuck Moore hit two free throws, but Westphal had done the damage; USC pulled it out to win, 71-68. No such luck against UCLA. The Bruins, looking flat after a game against Cal sixteen hours previously, let Stanford stay close until midway into the first half and then blew the Tribe off the court. Stanford shot 53% from the floor, but just could not get enough shots-the Redmen got 17 fewer rebounds, 16 fewer shots, and 18 fewer points than the Bruins. Sidney Wicks and Curtis Rowe, the two great UCLA forwards, underlined their height advantage by combining for 48 points and 30 rebounds while dominating baseline play at both ends of the court. 265 The rematch against Oregon State was the season's spiritual finale. The Beavers crashed to a 24-12 lead in what looked like a runaway. The Cards came charging back on Terry's 11 for 14 from the floor and a great effort from Mike Michel coming off the bench. Terry hit five straight shots for the Tribe to keep them within four points, until Palmer put a rebound back up for the bucket to tie the score at 69-69 with 1:57 to go. Neither side could score and Stanford brought the ball upcourt with under a minute left to work for the last shot. The ball went into the corner to Terry for the shot, but he was tightly covered. He fired it out to Michel, and the reserve forward took one look at the clock before arcing it in from 20 feet just before the buzzer. They wished it ended like that, but it didn't. Seven consecutive losses ensued, with both UCLA and Cal hitting the century mark in runaway victories. Many fans came to Maples just to watch the show. The show was taking place between 15 and 23 feet from the basket, where Claude Terry and Dennis O'Neill took most of their shots from. There were plenty of them; Stanford's backcourt duo took 45% of the team's shot total. Terry and O'Neill formed the highest-scoring pair of guards in Stanford history, averaging 19.6 and 16.6 points per game, respectively. Terry, dubbed Caliber Claude by two red-hots in the stands, netted 32 points in his varsity debut against Utah; this was the greatest rookie performance in Stanford basketball annals. It was no fluke-Claude hit 33 in a one point loss to Oregon, including 11 of 13 from the floor in the second half. The 6'5 guard paced the starters in field goal percentage with 48.4% and free throw percentage with 75.4%; his partner, O'Neill, hit on 45.6 % of his field goal attempts and 73.1% of his charities. O'Neill's high game came against Wyoming, where Dennis hit eight of eleven from the floor in the first half en route to a 36-point effort. 266 Terry can hit from anywhere on the court, and as such was the target of pressure defenses like that shown above by Cal. In general, O'Neill likes to drive more than Terry. (Left) Here, he one-hands a jumper over OSLTs star, Gary Freeman; this was the Tribe's final win of the year, a 71-69 squeaker. (Below) Dennis tosses in two of 22 he registered in the 68-71 loss to SC, and then barely eludes the spider-like arm of Cal's Ansley Truitt 267 (Left) Palmer spikes a shot by Wyoming's Carl Ashley. Ashley recovered enough to tally 16 points and nab 15 rebounds as the Cowboys riddled the Indian defense. (Above) Chuck Moore takes off against WSU as Green heads for the boards and big Larry Roscnzweig ambles. 268 I Senior center and captain Bill Palmer, a three-year letterman, was the littlest big man in the Pac-8 in both 1969 and 1970. Still, Palmer slung his 245 pounds around well enough near the boards to lead the club in rebounding; his 211 bounds also put him among the conference leaders in that department. Bill would often move outside to draw the opposition's center away from the basket, and showed a deft touch from the outside for a big man. Next to Palmer at one of the forward slots was Chuck Moore, a starter on the varsity in 1968 who sat out the 1969 season due to a back injury. The 6'4 Moore has great jumping ability, illustrated by the 20 rebounds he gleaned against Wyoming to set a Pavilion record; his 164 rebounds placed him second to Palmer on the club. Moore scored at a 9.4 ppg clip, most of which came from outside. 269 Mike Michel fires his patented jumper against SJS. Not a driver, Michel likes to get free on the periphery. A shot much like this one with :01 to go clinched the OSU game, 71-69. (Right) Fred Green hooks one over Cat's 6'10 Ansley Truitt. (Bottom) Green on a fast break. Wyoming's Stan Doods (45) needn't have looked so worried: he meshed 36 to help in Wyoming's 84-74 runaway. Fred Green, a first-year starter, appeared opposite Moore in the forecourt this year. Green, labelled The Hatchet, led the squad in fouls but stayed in long enough to tank 47.2% of his shots for an 8.6 average. A junior. Green tallied 17 for the Tribe in an early season loss to Washington, and exhibits a good touch from the corner as well as aggressive board play. 270 First row: Fred Green, Chuck Moore, Scott Reynolds, Mike Michel, Larry Rosenzweig, Tom Pfister; Second row: Bob Nicholson, Dennis O'Neill, Bill Palmer, Claude Terry, Chuck Sauer, Brian Hewitt; Third row: Coach Dallmar, Greg Osborne, Steve Kuchcnbccker, Brad Lind, Ed Martin, Bill Barber First row: Pat Stevens, Mike Boryla, John Stratton, Pat Rusco, Mark Hanson, Bob Buell; Second row: Jay Inslee, Jeb Johnson, Blake Baldwin, Kit Keyes, Steve Simon, Gil Sharp, Terry Winsor; Third row: Tim Taron, Steve Nightingale, Bruce Menser, Truett Welch, Coach Bowling, Coach Rickard 271 Swimming No other factor has played a more decisive role in the success of this year's swimming team than the eligibility of freshmen for varsity competition. Without the services of such outstanding performers as Brian Job, Tim Broderick, and Steve Carey, 1970 would have been a building year for Coach Gaughran's mermen. The addition of these three performers has in fact been the difference between victory and defeat in two of this season's dual meets; it is significant to note that the only dual meet loss sustained by the squad occurred in a meet in which the freshmen were not eligible to compete. Despite the addition of Job, last year's A.A.U. breaststroke champion, and the return of NCAA champions Fred Haywood (100 backstroke) and John Ferris (200 butterfly), the 1970 edition was hampered by a lack of depth, particularly in the freestyle events. This deficiency was clearly pointed out in the Pac-8 Championships, where the Tribe swept 10 out of 18 possible golds yet only managed a third place team finish. The team's 7-1 dual meet record belies the actual excitement of a season in which the Indians faced three of the nation's top five teams in head-to-head competition. After early season victories over Washington, Washington State, and the Santa Clara Swim Club, Stanford hosted a return match with Yale, fifth-rated nationally and the only team to defeat the Indians in 1969. In what had to be one of the most dramatic sports events ever contested on The Farm the Eli's edged Stanford, 58-55. The Indians, whose freshmen were prevented from competing by Ivy League restrictions, were also faced with a sick champion in John Ferris. An inspired and shaved down band of Bulldogs simply outraced the weakened Tribe. The contest meant the season to Yale, which only recently had been declared ineligible for the NCAA championships-unlike last year, there will be no chance for revenge in the nationals. The following weekend, the Indians took their speed-o's to Los Angeles, facing powerful USC and UCLA in dual meets. Rebounding from the previous week's disappointment, Stanford trounced fourth-ranked UCLA and toppled second-ranked USC for the second consecutive year, 59-54. Once again, the freshmen were the difference. Job set an NCAA record in the 200 breaststroke to key the Indians' win over UCLA. In addition to his 2:07.8 clocking in that event. Job swam a brilliant 57.6 leg in the Tribe's winning medley relay. Broderick and Carey also did their share, with Broderick winning the 200 free in 1:43.8 and taking a second in the 500 free while Carey was awarded a third in the 50 free on a judge's decision. In the Tribe's narrow victory over USC the following day, Job again won the breaststroke while Carey took the 50 free in 21.9 and Broderick swiped second in the 500. Junior distance freestyler Brent Berk put in a clutch performance in the 1000 free, clocking a 9:56 to finish just half a second behind USC's Greg Fink. 272 273 In the Pac-8 Championships, Stanford's deficiency in depth was all too apparent, placing it third behind UCLA and USC despite having won a majority of the events. Job, Haywood, and Ferris began to reach their respective competitive peaks, as each recorded multiple victories. Ferris was outstanding in winning the 200 Individual Medley in 1:57.6, the 200 fly in 1:52.6, and the 100 fly in 50.5, a new Pac-8 record. Team captain Haywood dominated the backstroke events as usual, and set meet records in both the 100 (52.68) and the 200 (1:57.1). Job and teammate Dave Schilling swam away with the breaststroke events: Job won the 100 in 58.4 with Schilling second, while in the 200 Job raced home in a new American record of 2:06.7, while Schilling clocked a 2:10.0 to finish third. Divers Bill Main and Ted Nichols continued their season-long dominance of the diving events. Main taking the one-meter crown with an aggregate score of 492.3 while Nichols copped the three-meter title. Freestyler Carey nabbed third in the 50 and fifth in the 100 before teaming up with Haywood, Job, and Ferris to steal the 400 medley relay in a record 3:29.9. In the meet's final event, Ferris, Carey, Bob Jamison, and Rick Eagleston combined for a 3:09.17 clocking and second place in the 400 free relay. Outstanding individual performances, rather than depth, will be the determining factor at the NCAA. The meet will mark the first time this season that the team has shaved down, yet although second place is easily within reach, it would require a superb effort to upset defending champion Indiana and their leader, Olympian Mark Spitz. Ferris, Haywood, and Job will be the principal determinants of where Stanford finishes, but the unity and competitive spirit that caused the Redmen to bounce back after the Yale meet will also assume prominence. 274 275 V ! (Below) Jerry Beaudoin gets a reversal against his UCSB opponent 276 An 8-5-1 Record would seem creditable in most sports, but it was a disappointing one for the Stanford wrestlers. Led by co-captains Terry Crenshaw (177) and Bill Ross (167), the Indians began the season impressively by scoring three decisive wins in the first two days of action, thumping Cal State Fullerton, 24-12, and pinning San Diego State, 20-13. But this was just preparation for the biggest meet of the season, against UCLA. Dave Kopolow (126) started the route with a decision, his third win for the weekend. Triumphs by Dave Thomas (142), Len Smith (150), Ray Williams (190), Lee Fair (Hvywt), and a pin by Crenshaw gave Stanford its first victory ever over the Bruins in wrestling and a 3-0 slate. The Indians then moved to Hayward to encounter Cal State and the University of Nevada in a double dual meet. With Kopolow, Thomas, Crenshaw, and Fair all winning both matches, the Tribe extended its mark by scores of 25-11 over Cal State and 33-9 over Nevada. The skein continued for the next two weeks, with Stanford posting wins over UCSB, 22-14, and SF State, 19-15. Undefeated in seven starts, Stanford finally got hijacked by arch-rival Cal, 27-9. This meet resulted in a rash of injuries, such that nearly all of the starters were out of commission at one time or another for the remainder of the season. San Jose State fell, 22-16, before highly-touted Southern Illinois thrashed the weakened Cards, 23-9. George Hanson (158), Jerry Ross (150), Jerry Boudoin (142), and Charlie Harris (134) filled in admirably for injured matmen in the ensuing weeks, as Coach Reed tried to juggle his lineup to have a competitor in each weight class. The experience wasn't there, however, and a 15-15 tie in the San Jose State rematch marked the only bright spot in the final weeks; Fresno State, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, and Cal all butchered the Indians. At the Pac-8 championships, the Stanford grapplers finished sixth out of the seven teams entered, with Oregon State winning its seventh straight title. Len Smith was the only Tribe place-getter, taking a second in the 150-pound class and giving notice of a possible place in the upcoming NCAA tourney. Bruce Bell strains in a takedown against UCSB Front row: Dave Kopolow, Dale Ikeda, Warren Araki, Dave Thomas, George Grappler, Len Smith, George Hansen, Jerry Ross; Second row: Sam Karita, Doug Washington, Bill Ross, Terry Crenshaw, Hal Hothan, Bob Leeper, Ray Williams. Lee Fair, Art Smiley, Coach Reed 277 Gymnastics If we were talking about the stock market, we'd say The Stanford Gymnastics Team remains on an upward trend, with growth in all areas. If we could take a motion picture from 1969 into the mid-1970's in Stanford Gymnastics, this improvement would be readily apparent. If we lift a few frames of the 1970 season from this motion picture, here's what we would see: The dual-meet win-loss record this season was 2 wins, 7 losses. Last year's record was 2 wins, 7 losses. This apparent lack of improvement is explained by the fact that the two teams Stanford outscored last year were not included on this year's schedule. Coach Dan Millman likes to schedule only equal or better teams to continuously challenge the Indian team. The high team score in 1969 was 133.0. In 1970, the second meet of the year the Indians scored better than that, and continuously improved to end the season with a score of well over 140.0. This improvement is made even more impressive by two facts: First, gymnastics judging is generally stricter each year. Second, of the three top men in each event for six events, making a total of 18 men. 13 of these are freshmen. And hardworking, talented freshmen at that. Coach Millman feels that the future should be very bright for the gymnastics program. The audience was larger at the first home meet of the season than the combined audience the entire 1969 season. For the second home meet, the crowds doubled again. Millman adds, When people come to see a gymnastics meet, attracted by the aesthetics and beauty as well as danger and excitement, they will always come back to see more. What I've been trying to do this season is introduce the students to a fine team and exciting sport-art. Outstanding performers this season were: Rich Jerome, a freshman who never competed in high school and who is now one of the top all-around performers on the West Coast; Chris Harrold, a freshman, and an outstanding, solid, aggressive performer in all events; Steve Rochell, nicknamed Lord of the Rings by his teammates, is one of the nation's top rings performers; Murray Kephart, a freshman who promises to be one of the nation's top high bar performers next year and who also excels in free exercise; Ted Miyamoto, a freshman from Hawaii who is a tremendously dedicated all-around gymnast; Brian Morgan, a sophomore with exceptionally clean style who works free exercise, rings, vaulting and high bar; and Bob Tomlinson, a junior and a diligent side horse specialist. The only senior the Indians will lose will be Dennis Mesick, a top side horse performer. According to Coach Millman, recruiting looks good and the team should improve in all areas and depth. Anyone who saw 1970 Indian gymnastics cannot help but anticipate a thrilling season in 1971. 279 Ted Miyamoto, Brian Morgan, Murray Kephart, Dennis Mesick, Coach Dan Millman, Bob Tomlinson, Chris Harrold, Rich Jerome. Steve Rochell The Usual Definitions of sport do not apply to rugby at Stanford. It's a hell of a lot more than that: a pleasurable melding of competition, cameraderie, contact, and even sociability. In the past few years, this tradition has coincided with impressive records on the field. The 1970 version was no different, and must be ranked as one of the most successful ever to play for Stanford. The success of the varsity rested in the ability of the scrum to get the ball to the remarkably fleet back line. It all began with halfback Jim Squeri's quick pitches to fly half Don Bunce. While Squeri proceeded to fall on his head, Bunce would lateral back to inside center Chuck Williams or break away himself. From there on in it was just like football, with the ball going out to gridders Jim Kauffman, Jack Lasater, or Jack Schultz; amazingly enough, it worked. The scrum, led and yelled by captain Joe Neal, improved throughout the season until the hooks of Bill Buckland and the jumping of Ron Kadziel and Leon Hartvickson were as polished as the skills of the back line. Where polish failed, the field coverage of Pat Preston, Killer Killefer, and Jerry Dover applied the crunch to any loose balls or those unfortunate enough to be holding on to them. The season began with easy wins over local club sides Peninsula Rugby Club, Peninsula Ramblers, and San Francisco. Things toughened up when the Bay Area Touring Side, top-ranked nationally, come to the Farm. Aware of the Cards' speedy back line, BATS played a defensive game that successfully shut off the Indian offense. The only Stanford scores came on the kicking of Hartvickson and a try by Killefer, which still left the Tribe on the short end of the 15-11 final score. In the ensuing weeks the ruggers made mincemeat of UCLA, St. Mary's, and British Columbia by the respective scores of 23-8, 32-0, and 54-14. In the regular season finale, Stanford defended its possession of the Scrum Axe by beating Cal twice. The first game was close, with the back line troubled by the Bears' narrow and muddy field. The 14-12 victory was only achieved through the great forward play of Pat Preston and some fine defensive kicking by Kip Oxman and Stu Wilson. But in the rematch, the Indians overcame a slow start to roll to a 17-8 triumph, possession of the Axe, and a 9-1 season record. The Tribe ruggers are odds-on favorites to take their third consecutive Monterey Rugby Tournament championship in late March. 280 First row: Leon Hartivckson, Bill Buckland, Jim Kauffman; Second row: Jack Lasater, Kip Oxman, Jack Schultz, Don Bunce, Chuck Williams, Jim Squeri, Ray Wilson; Third row: Stu Wilson, Jack Alustiza, Wade Killcfer, Joe Neal, Pat Preston, Ron Kadziel, Bill Alexander, Coach Pete Kmetovic; Fourth row: Ken Russel, Wes Smith, Terry Dover, Ken McDonald 281 Stanford’s Incipient Ice hockey club gained some much needed organization, talent, and recognition from the student body this year, but none of it came easily. Membership and participation doubled, and although the club suffered its second straight losing season since its conception in 1968, the year had to be termed successful!. The foundation that was built in 1970 will insure the club's continued existence and success in its newly-formed league with teams from San Francisco, Belmont, and two Berkeley clubs. Practicing only once a week, on Sunday night, put the club at a disadvantage; the other league teams spent a lot more time on ice. But if the experience wasn't there, at least the old standbys of hustle and desire were. And a highlight, too. That came in the first intercollegiate ice hockey game on the west coast, Stanford versus Cal in the debut of the Big Game on Ice. The game ended in a 3-3 deadlock before an excited crowd of 2,500 in the Oakland Coliseum. The 1971 season will be greatly expanded-tentative games are scheduled with Air Force, Spokane's own Gonzaga College, a semi-pro team from Fresno, and all the teams in the league. The Club is working hard, despite the paucity of hockey facilities in the area, to make intercollegiate hockey a spectator sport in California. 282 First row: Bobby Hull, Rcdline Love, George Goaltender, Ian Westcrlein, Pat Baldwin; Second row: Bob Kadlec, Don Anderson, Eddie Leonard, Doug Adams, Paul Titman, Fuller Torrey, Rich Love, Jerry Crease. 283 spring sports Here are three reasons why Stanford's baseball team is among the best in the nation. (Above) An exuberant Steve Dunning is congratulated as he crosses the plate after belting a three-run homer against Cal State Hayward. (Above right) Jim Coate curls one at a Cal Poly batter; Jim got two RBI's in yielding only two runs and boosting his record to 3-0. (Right) Phil Keller hums one plateward. The hard-luck workhorse of the pitching staff lost this one in ten innings, 1-0, as Poly hurler Gene Wiley muffled the Tribe bats by registering 17 strikeouts. 284 Second baseman Dick Borchers looks for the ball as shortstop Dave Edson checks the call. (Bottom) First baseman Jack Lynn gets a loud foul off Fresno State. That's all anyone got; the Indians were one-hit, 6-0. Rolling Through the early season on the strong arms of a fine pitching corps, Stanford tuned up for the Pac-8 regular season by posting a 22-5-1 mark. This outstanding record earned the Indians a runner-up berth in the national polls behind USC, a startling position considering the graduation of eight starters from the 1969 team. That squad compiled a 34-12 ledger to place second in the league, and at the outset of the regular season, the 1970 Indians seemed sure to better that mark. The difference, as alumni hurler Rod Poteete, now in the Dodger organization, pointed out, was that the bats that had often remained silent in 1969 were more potent this year. Although run production did climb, the offensive attack remained a problem. Two of the pre-season defeats demonstrate this. Cal Poly bested the Cards 1-0 to send 1969 AII-Pac-8 pitcher Phil Keller down to his first defeat of the year; Keller's outstanding effort was nullified as Poly fireballer Gene Wiley fanned 17 batters and scattered six hits to gain the victory. Steve Dunning was a hard-luck loser to Air Force in the Riverside Tournament—Dunning struck out 19 Falcons and allowed only a Texas League single, but was sabotaged by three errors in the ninth inning, 2-1. Fortunately, these heartbreakers were the exception. Stanford carried a 13-2-1 record into the Riverside Tournament, where Arizona State, USC, St. John's, and Tulsa converged to defend their rankings among the nation's top ten. Stanford was the nation's top team for a day, as Phil Keller no-hit Arizona State, 1-0, and USC lost to Air Force, But after putting together a 4-0 tourney mark, the roof fell in and the Indians dropped three straight to finish second behind USC. Steve Dunning was named MVP of the tournament on the strength of two outstanding pitching performances and his eight RBI's, while freshman first baseman Mike Nelson was also named to the All-Tourney team. 285 Returning to the Bay Area, the Tribe took five consecutive games from local opponents. Santa Clara fell, 16-7, as outfielders Mike Ewing and Don Schellenberg cracked home runs; Schellenberg tagged another circuit clout the following day to provide the margin in a 4-3 squeaker over Cal State. After dumping SF State, the Cards faced a fine San Jose State team in a Sunken Diamond doubleheader. Entering with a record of 16-5, the Spartans left 16-7. Dunning tied into one in the first game, sending it 420 feet for a grand slam to make the difference in the 9-7 contest. He came back in the second game to twirl a five-hitter and strike out 16 in posting his eighth win of the year against only one loss. Ewing, averaging .292 in mid-April, crashed four hits for four RBI's in the doubleheader to signal his return to the plateau that earned him a spot on the All District-8 Second Team last year. Of the regulars. Dunning led the hitters into April, averaging .300 with four home runs and 24 RBI's. He and Ewing (18 RBI's), outfielder Hank Snider (.291), and first sacker Nelson (.276 with 17 RBI's), formed the core of the attack. But the bread and butter was the pitching staff, paced by Dunning (86 strikeouts, 1.39 ERA), Keller (5-2, 64 strikeouts, 1.74 ERA), and Jim Coate (4-1, 1.85 ERA). With a little help from their friends, this trio could put USC out of business at the national championships. 286 (Opposite left) Junior college transfer Sandy Swanson takes off for third on an attempted steal. (Opposite right) Steve Dunning's 86 strikeouts halfway through the season led the team in that department. (Left) Shortstop Edson rifles a throw to first sacker Nelson for the putout. (Below) Outfielder Don Schellenberg, batting .255 with eleven RBI's in the early season, puts some wood on the ball with his fluid swing. 287 Basestealing is an art. A cautious lead, the stretch, the shoulder turn, the dash, the flash of spikes, a headlong dive, a cloud of dust. The man must travel ninety feet, the ball 188. It is a game within a game, four seconds that for beauty and timing can stand alone. And like so few other events, the judgment is absolute: it is not 7'A on a dive with degree of difficulty 2.6; it is Out!” or Safe! Out! means foolish, wrong, and that the distance back to the dugout is long and lonely. A resounding SAFE! makes it all worthwhile. There are different kinds of basestealers. Willie Mays in his heyday was flashing and flamboyant, feinting a dash to draw the pitcher's pickoff move in hopes of an errant throw or of keeping the pitcher form concentrating on the plate. Maury Wills was the master of another philosophy, inching silently away from the bag as if to make the pitcher forget that he was there. The pickoff move usually came anyway: once, twice, three times or more. But eventually the shoulder would turn towards the plate, and Wills was gone as quickly and quietly as he had come. Before and after: ready to go either way, Mike Nelson cautiously eyes the Cal Poly pitcher before diving back in to beat the pickoff attempt. 288 289 (Right) Concentration like this helped Dunning amass six thefts by mid-season to pace the team. (Above) Outfielder Swanson throws in to second after fielding a Texas Leaguer. (Above right) Nelson beats out an infield hit. 290 Varsity baseball. First row: Phil Kelber. Dave Ed son. Curt Fant, 8ruce Schoen, Bob Marshall, Phil Keller, Mike Ewing; Second row: Hank Snider, Sandy Swanson, Bob Reece, Don Schellenberg, Dick Borchcrs, Tom Changnon, Jack Lynn; Third row: Coach Ray Young, Mike Nelson, Jim Coatc, Steve Dunning, Bob Kammeyer, Bob Wilhelm, Glen Johnson, Percy LeBarry. Coach Tom Dunton Junior Varsity baseball. First row: Vic Gordon. Tony Porcello, Dave Ciavarclla. Gary Osterhout, Mickey Aguirre. Andy Frank, Randy Campbell; Second row: John Dcy, Jim Kaffen. Al O'Brien, Tom Schiff, Mike Leathers, Scott Bush. Tom Williams; Third row: Coach Jim Jones, Steve Schwager, Kevin Cronin, Pat Rusco. Rod Boone, Tim Wilson, Mike Timmel, Coach Bob Sharpe 291 (Above) Pete Fairchild passes off to Greg Ford in the mile relay. (Right) A Dyson, a freshman sprinter, shows his versatility by leaping 23'5 in the long jump. (Opposite above) Duncan Macdonald and Decker Underwood receive well deserved congratulations from Coach Jordan after their 1-2 finish in the mile against UCLA. (Opposite below) Dave Larsen with his own adaptation of the Fosbury flop easily dears 6'2 . 292 Bolstered by the addition of several transfers and an outstanding brigade of freshmen, the 1970 track team will be stronger than last year's although it will probably fail to improve its sixth-place Pac-8 finish. The long-distance corps provided the bulk of Stanford's dual meet points in the early season, and must be considered the Tribe's strongest area. Brook Thomas has already run a 9:09 3,000-meter steeplechase, and 1969 All-American Greg Brock has established early-season marks of 8:45.2 in the two mile and 4:09.8 in the mile. Duncan Macdonald's lifetime best of 4:06.4 came early this year, with freshman Decker Underwood (4:10.2) and Don Kardong (4:08.1) also posted fast times in that event. Kardong, coming off a fine cross-country season, singled himself out as an important point-winner by logging a school record 8:45.2 in the two mile for a tie with Brock and by edging Greg against UCLA with an 8:49.2. In the half mile Macdonald again leads the field, having been timed in 1:52.4 over that distance. Stanford strength in these areas is illustrated by the fact that the Indian distance men have totalled 71 out of a possible 108 points in these events. The hurdles, a former Card forte, have been hurt by an injury to junior Rick Tipton, whose lifetime best of 13.9 over the 120 highs puts him second in Stanford history. Transfer Bill Griffith has taken up some of the slack with his 14.2 best, while in the 440 intermediates school record-holder Randy White has a 52.6 to his credit and a win against UCLA. 293 Freshmen have been particularly evident in the field events: high school record holder Casey Carrigan cleared 16'0 in the pole vault at the beginning of the year despite recurring attacks of mononucleosis, and Rod Utley established a new frosh record of 48'6% in the triple jump. Other leading field performers have been Allen Meredith in the triple jump (50'1 IV ). Captain T. C. Jones in the shot put (57'5 ), Steven Davis in the discus (176'9 ), and Dave Harper in the high jump (6'6 ). These bests do not consitute overall strength: the Indians will be fortunate to finish higher than sixth in a track-rich Pac-8 that contains such perennial national powers as USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Washington State. Things may be so dry that Stanford may not win a single dual meet unless Coach Payton Jordan suddenly discovers a good 440 man or a couple of sprinters. Freshman speedster Al Dyson (9.9 100, 21.6 220), counted upon heavily after he won 11 points against SJS, pulled a hamstring in the second meet of the year and was out for several important contests. With Tipton just beginning to run, the Indians have been forced to concede 20 to 30 points in the sprints and relays before the meet even got under way. Prognosis: a long year of experience for a young squad, even... yes, a building year. Pete Dreissigacker exhibits the form that has placed him only two inches away from a new frosh record in the discus. (Above right) Don Kardong leads Greg Brock and Arvid Kretz (partially hidden behind UCLA's Cliff Mosher) to another Stanford two-mile sweep. (Opposite above left) Team Captain T. C. Jones gets set to unload against SJS. (Opposite above right) Duncan Macdonald, with a season's best of 4:06.4, breaks the tape against SJS. (Opposite bottom) Having recuperated from an early season injury, Rick Tipton leads a 1-2 sweep in the 120 highs against UCLA. Tipton and teammate Bill Griffeth were timed in 14.3 and 14.4, respectively. 294 295 (Above right) Brook Thomas dears the water jump on the way to a second place finish in the steeplechase against San Jose State. (Bottom left) Clint Ostrander slips over the bar by a good foot at 14'6 . (Bottom right) Triple jumper Allen Meredith, consistently improving his marks throughout the season, extends to 50'11'A against UCLA. 296 (Belov ) Frosh phenom and no. 1 singles Roscoe Tanner blasts a backhand. (Right) Rick Evans gets off the ground to return this overhead backhand down the line. 298 Third doubles Mac Claflin joins teammate Evans at the net to put away a backhand volley. What A Pity that one of the top five tennis teams in the country is only ranked third in its conference. Tennis in the Pac-8 usually comes down to a contest between crosstown rivals UCLA and USC, ranked one and two nationally this year. Some people thought 1970 might be different when the Tribe swept through its first seven matches, overturning such highly-regarded teams as Utah and Big-10 Champion Michigan. A trip to the Southland dashed these hopes, as first UCLA and then the Trojans demolished the Indian netters. Maybe the next three years will see some changes: three of the team's top six are freshmen, and only one of those six will graduate, fourth singles Rob Rippner. The optimists of 1970 will have their day. The season opener found San Fernando State, the defending NCAA College Division champs, at Stanford-and the score showed the season's potentialities. The six singles players lost a total of only one set. and the Indians pulled of a 9-0 whitewash. After the season had been interrupted long enough for the Tribe to cop the team, individual (Roscoe Tanner over teammate Rippner in the finals), and doubles (Tanner and Rippner) titles. Coach Dick Gould took his group back to Stanford for two important matches. On consecutive days, Michigan and Utah fell under the axe, 7-2, and 5!4-3' i. Southpaw sensation Tanner beat Michigan's John Hanline the first day before besting Utah's All-American Dan Bleckinger 6-3, 6-2. The freshman from Tennessee also jointed with Rippner to capture the first doubles both days. Two other freshman lefties played important roles: Rich Fisher and Gery Groslimond each won two singles matches and teamed to take the second doubles crown both days. Before the Los Angeles trip, the Cards crushed Oregon, 8-1, and the Pebble Beach All-Stars, 13-3; all six singles players won their Oregon matches in two sets. There the string ended. Tanner suffered his first setback of the year against the Bruins as Jeff Borowiak, one of the nation's top-ranked amateurs, took him on in straight sets 6-4, 9-7. Freshmen Groslimond and Fisher racked up Stanford's only point, that coming in the second doubles by the score of 7-5, 14-12. The Tribe fared slightly better against USC. but depth was the difference. Tanner won Stanford's only singles point, whipping Tom Leonard 6-4, 8-6. Erik Van Dillen, a San Mateo product who claims a top spot in the national amateur rankings, whipped Rich Fisher 6-4, 7-5. Two doubles pairings were triumphant: Tanner and Rippner picked up a point against Leonard and Steve Avoyer 1-6, 6-3, 6-4; Rick Evans and sophomore Mac Claflin netted the other one in the third doubles 2-6, 6-4, 6-3. This is the best tennis team since Coach Gould has been at Stanford, and it cannot help but improve with age and experience. The next few years could serve to establish Stanford as a consistent top-flight tennis power in the same league as UCLA and USC. (Opposite page, left) Freshman southpaw Rich Fisher powers a serve. Fisher played no. 2 singles this year. (Opposite page, right) Evans hustles to return a deep baseline drive. 299 300 First row: Chico Meyers, Bill Atkins, Rob Rippner, Wes Hampton, Jim Healy, Dean Margot, Dave Orleans; Second row: Coach Dick Gould, Roscoe Tanner, Rick Evans, John Wright, Rick Fisher, Gary Groslimond, Paul Marienthal, Jeff Lamborn; missing: Mac Claflin With The Departure of nine seniors from last year's team, 1970 looked to be a building year for Coach Will Condon's varsity crew. Appearances can be deceiving. Condon used the inexperience of the squad to great advantage, adopting the eastern style of rowing to make Stanford the innovator of this stroke on the west coast. This undertaking involved a number of technical changes in each individual's rowing style, ranging from a quicker catch to a slight pause in the bow at the end of each stroke—changes that would have been almost impossible to accomplish with experienced oarsmen. But the advent of Joe Bracewell, last year's captain of Harvard's lightweight eight, has greatly facilitated the change; Bracewell has served as Assistant Coach, and worked with each team member in the transition. Conditioning combining stadium stairs workouts in the fall and rowing in the winter, is the usual course of events for the team. Providentially, an extremely dry winter enabled the oarsmen to get extensive practice on the new stroke, and the results have been remarkable. The varsity, JV, and frosh have swept to impressive early-season victories over St. Mary's, Oregon State, USC, and Santa Clara. In fact, it seems that both the first and second varsity boats will have a good shot at unseating perennial champion Washington and taking undefeated records back to the national championships in Syracuse, New York. 301 (Right) Dirk Speas winds up from the point; (Bottom) Butch Hazlett face-dodges a SF Lacrosse Club defender; (Opposite, top) Paul Tipman shoots from the restraining line; (Opposite, bottom) Who says lacrosse is a contact sport? 302 Lacrosse at Stanford is a small club sport that performs incredibly well. The undefeated record of 1968 was not particularly spectacular; the club approaches that record each year, and is perennial champion in its league consisting of clubs from San Francisco, Marin, Palo Alto, and Cal. The real tests come against the other Western powers: Denver and the Air Force Academy. The season began in 1970 with a game against Denver, and the superior ballhandling of the Colorado team was evident in the 10-6 loss. Attackman Chip Loveman, the team's leading scorer in the early season, bagged four of the Tribe's goals himself and assisted in another. In the second game, against the East Bay Lacrosse Club, the same weaknesses were manifest. Although the Indians out-scored their opponents 9-3 and took four times as many shots, shoddy play prevailed. Things improved overnight: the next day the Tribe dismantled the SF Lacrosse Club, 8-4. Time after time, the defense and its stalwart veterans Wade Killefer and Bill Eakland broke up SF attempts to mount an offensive. The attack performed in much the same way: methodically. Ballhandling improved to the point that the Indians were able to set up around the defensive perimeter, working the ball around until there was an opening for a shot. Penalties marred an otherwise well-played match, with the two clubs amassing over nineteen minutes of penalties between them. This is an old squad, with the mainstays having played together for three years. The attack was spearheaded by Loveman, vet George Muser, and freshman Butch Hazlett, Dirk Speas stood out in the midfield, while old hacks Killefer and player-coach Eakland defended the goal. The loss of Eakland through graduation will seriously weaken the club. Eakland, a great defenseman and field leader, also took on the role of coach this year, and has been responsible for much of the success of lacrosse as a sport at Stanford in the past three years. The record of the 1971 team will depend to a great extent on its ability to replace Eakland as a coach, a team leader, and a defenseman. 303 No. 2 man Tom Keelin helps Gary Vanier line up a putt. (Right) The ball is barely visible through the sand as Vanier blasts out. For you duffers: see how much his head has followed the flight of the ball? (Opposite page) Keelin wraps his driver around his neck after a shank. 304 First row: John Beers, Denny Colvin, Coach Finger; Second row: Jim Eddy, Rick Lawrence, Paul Waters, Dan Roth As With So Many other spring sports, the golfers have a strong, young team that has a chance at the Pac-8 crown this year, but one that will continue to grow stronger in the next two years even without the addition of any new players. Led by junior Tom Watson, the hackers should be able to improve on last year's ninth-place finish in the National Championships. Although hurt by the graduation of four of the top six players from that team, the 1970 squad convinced many people that they were moving rapidly towards a league crown by placing fourth (and ahead of a strong USC team) in the Far West Intercollegiate, ten strokes behind winner Brigham Young. Watson tied for second in the individual standings with rounds of 70, 74, and 78 for a 222; teammate Tom Keel in was only one stroke back at 223. The only defeat registered in the pre season tune-up was to Fresno State, which took a 16-11 decision from the Tribe while Watson was at the Masters Tournament by virtue of his fifth-place finish in the U.S. Amateur. With only Bruce Doering and Larry Cram graduating, the nucleus of the team will return next year. Golf was especially competitive at Stanford in 1970, as many sophomores and juniors were capable of playing on the varsity. There was no obvious cutoff for the permanent roster, and many of these sophomores and juniors played in matches infrequently. Among these players who will improve given a chance to compete regularly were juniors Jeff Herser, Clem Richardson, John Brock, Bob Burns, sophomores Gary Vanier, Jim Dwulett, Pete Harpster, Tom Gurnee, and Mike Meagher. They and the returning starters will be the core of the corps that could bring the Pac-8 championship back to Stanford for the first time since 1968. 305 First row: John Beers, Coach Finger, Bob Burns; Second row: Denny Colvin, Bruce Doering, Jim Dwulett. Gary Vanier; Third row: Clem Richardson, Larry Cram, Tom Keelin, Sandy McCall, Jeff Heiser In The First Year of official NCAA-sanctioned competition, the Stanford volleyball team is a strong contender in the race towards the first national championship. Most of the team has been together now for four years; these players, Mike Stevens, Ernie Banks, Mike Moore, Eric Rhinholm, Jim Julian, Tony Lettunich, Don Ingram, and Eric Peterson, plus newcomers Pat Moore and Neil McMahon, have been preparing since Fall quarter for the Western regionals, and national championships at UCLA. In March, the Stanford team traveled to UCSB to participate in the major collegiate tournament of the year in California. Competing against UCLA and San Diego State in one of the two five-team pools, the Tribe finished in a second-place tie with San Diego State. Because only two teams from each pool could go to the finals at the end of the day. Stanford was eliminated on the basis that it had allowed five more points to be scored against it than had San Diego State. Later that evening, UCLA and San Diego State finished first and second, respectively, in the finals. The NCAA selection committee gave invitations for the Western regionals to those four finalists, but decided to set up a playoff between the third place teams at Santa Barbara in order to give Stanford a chance to earn an invitation. In that playoff match against USC, the Indians got the regional bid by taking three straight games 15-6, 15-8, and 15-11. Beginning Spring quarter, the team intensified preparations and entered the AAU Far-Western Championships as a tune-up for the NCAA's. At that open-division tournament, with U.S. Olympic team members on several of the teams, Stanford tied for first place in one of the four brackets, losing to Ciscos' Volleyball Club in the first round of the playoffs. Ciscos' went on to defeat three other teams and to play in the finals. Stanford will travel to Long Beach State in mid-April to meet the seven other collegiate powers of the western United States; the team must finish in the top three to go to the Nationals the following week. Whatever the team's finish, it has shown the interest and dedication to put the university at the top in this new and fast-rising collegiate sport. 306 307 First row: Eric Rhinholm, Pat Moore, Eric Peterson, Don Ingram, Mike Moore; Second row: Ernie Banks, Mike Stevens, Jim Julian, Neil McMahon, Tony Lettunich, Chris McLachlin 308 intramurals S CO The world of intramurals is redemption and second life for over 5,000 small time athletes who thought they left their last sweat sock in their high school gym locker. Both the prep journeyman and the high school flash who come to Stanford with vague dreams of continuing a sports career are never denied. Most miss out on intercollegiate athletics. Some don't even try for them. Nevertheless one can star on a different scale. The uniforms aren't as classy, and the crowds are sometimes non existent, but IM competition still lets latent jocks grovel in the mud or pop the difficult baseline jumper. The possibility is always open that a mediocre high school player will become the IM Jerry West of his league. Dreams live on. Murals also serve as a lie detector test. Those that brag of high school laurels in the fall must put up the goods in IM play in the winter. Frats, freshmen, and trailer freaks flex bodies in everything from football to horseshoes, and the enthusiasm is for real. More blood is spilled under the boards at Maples during IM games than in the highly regulated varsity contests. In far too many cases, intramurals are a traumatic experience. College men in what millions term the best years of their lives see bodies go bad on them. After a few hours of booking, reflexes tend to fail, and flashy prep guards are no longer able to beat the press in the Stanford IM circuit. The initial thrill of lacing on the high whites for another season you never thought possible vanishes when suddenly the legs go after only five minutes of play. But if the talent and stamina still remain, I M's are paradise. It's the curve ball to the fading fast ball pitcher, and the ABA to a slowing Celtic great. It lengthens the competitive career by four years. And there are always the great stories you can take home about the time you won the game in the last second with a 25-foot jumper. Who'll know? Murals are college athletics without the big time pressure or work. It's high school phys. ed. all over again. No experience necessary. It's a kick in the ass. 310 nun.i 311 312 313 women's sports 314 WRA Officers and Managers: Barb Underhill, track and field; lathin Annand, president; Dorothy Hartley, publicity; Pam Rollefson, vice president; Karen Salveson, golf; Eileen Dillon, bowling; Tay Haines, gymnastics; and Karen Cartwright, basketball. Womens Recreation Association WRA is you—the Stanford Woman. Every woman student belongs to the Women's Recreation Association, and one dollar of her tuition each quarter pays her dues. Through its board, composed of the officers, dorm representatives and managers from all the extracurricular groups and teams, WRA coordinates and directs many different projects and activities. Some are corecreational, such as open pool hours, fencing club, or badminton and volleyball nights. Among the WRA-sponsored intramurals, basketball and women's tennis singles have been especially popular this year. On the intermural level, WRA cooperates with the Women's P.E. Department in sending Stanford teams to intercollegiate tournaments. It also provides dorms and overseas campuses with athletic equip-ment-the ping-pong table for your house, and the soccer ball for your Britain group are courtesy of WRA. 315 Shelley Hamlin Golf is a thinking game-you've got to plan and concentrate, according to Shelley Hamlin, WRA's Athlete of the Year. She was contrasting it with her other favorite sport, tennis, which she considers much more spontaneous. Shelley started golf at the age of 13 when her family joined a country club. She began golf lessons in the morning and swimming lessons in the afternoon. But my golf game improved so much more rapidly than my swimming—I enjoyed the game, and enjoyed meeting so many new people. A year later came the chance to meet even more new people when she played in her first tournament, at Carmel. Everybody was having such a good time, Shelley reminisced, and I noticed the winner was having an especially good time. That gave me a real incentive to play better. Increased incentive manifested itself in increased skill, and at 17, Shelley was chosen as one of the three girls to represent the United States on the International Women's Amateur Golf Team. The championships were held in Mexico City, and Shelley described the event as kind of the golfing Olympics. Two years later came another opportunity to travel, this time to Ireland, with the Curtis Cup team. This past year, she has been named All-Star Woman Collegiate Golfer, and was featured on the cover of The Lady Golfer magazine. A native of Fresno, Shelley is a junior at Stanford, majoring in political science. She is not settled yet on her future plans, but professional golf is definitely not among them. I've played in some pro tournaments, she said, and professional life just doesn't appeal to me. What she would like to do is to use her major by going into politics. She thinks there should be more communication between the government and the governed, and intends to work on the problem. Perhaps there Shelley will be able to apply the planning and concentration which golf has taught her. 316 317 318 319 320 MORE THAN DORMITORIES by Chris Harte Chris Harte is a junior history major and a sponsor in Trancos. He is chairman of the Dean's Office Committee on Residence Configuration. Stanford has made great progress in student residences in the last four years, but there is danger today that it will rest on those changes without completing the transition that is needed. We may think today that simply because we have a few model houses, somehow the others are better off than they used to be; or we may be tempted to believe that because students can choose their residences from a variety of options this somehow means the dorms are educational or enjoyable places to live. It wasn't many years ago that Stanford's residence plan wouldn't have been recognizable to today's student. Coeducation, integrated classes, theme houses or any academic component of residences at all—these were virtually unknown just four years ago. Indeed, the campus was split into two halves, with almost all the women in Roble, Florence Moore, and Lagunita and only a small detachment in Branner allowed to live near the men in Wilbur, Stern, and Toyon. With nothing but 700 freshman men, Wilbur was incredibly isolated and regularly brought out the lowest common denominator in its residents. The system didn't stay that way because of lack of interest in change, at least among students. After all, coeducation at the overseas campuses had worked out very well, and a large number of students here had been through the program and wanted it transplanted to America. The first major steps occurred during the 66-67 academic year. Dave Harris had talked a lot about the quality of life during his campaign, and when he became president he established a housing commission under the direction of sponsor Jan Jacobi. The group was expanded to include faculty and administrators and broken down to concentrate on the separate areas of university housing. While its work was still underway, the Phi Delts were expelled from their house for the rest of the year, leaving an excellent facility empty for two quarters. Members of the housing commission began immediately to agitate for a coeducational and class-integrated house that would have some form of academic content. The administrative reception for this idea wasn't exactly overwhelming at the start, but when Professor Mark Mancall was drafted to be the new house's faculty resident, he was given wide latitude to set the house up as he saw fit. And thus the development of the Grove House, with coeducation, integration, graduate tutors living in, and a faculty resident and numerous faculty associates, was not only a major step in itself, but also a showcase for the ideas that the housing commission was working on. When the commission completed its deliberation, it printed a report that was filled not only with 321 recommendations but with well-founded analyses to back them. up. Segregation of freshmen, especially into complexes like Wilbur, was seen as prolonging the high school experience and cutting off freshmen from much of the excitement, intellectual and other, that existed around the campus. Coeducation was something obviously desired by large numbers of students, a situation with great benefits in breaking down old patterns of boy-girl behavior and few if any of the terrible dangers fretted about by old-guard administrators and faculty. The wide chasm that was then almost universal between academic experience on the quad and social existence in the dorms was harshly criticized, and it was pointed out that the intellectual could be extended into students' everyday lives without totally destroying their privacy or social existences. Most of the commission's conclusions were then and are now widely accepted ideas. That only minor portions of them have been implemented is due in large part to some very substantial practical problems. Integration could be accomplished today only at a ration of about one freshman to one upperclassman, a proportion that most students and faculty associated with integrated residences think would be even worse than the present situation. Coeducation cannot be made universal except on the two-to one ratio that now exists within the undergraduate student body as a whole, and this again is seen as far from ideal. And obviously financial restraints prohibit the kinds of faculty and graduate student association within the dorms that most feel would be optimal. But while these roadblocks exist, it is also clear that Stanford has once again entered a period of just accepting its residence plan, making occasional minor adjustments in it, of course, but failing to ask whether it is the best educational system available, whether it meets the intellectual and emotional and social needs of students. Certainly strong arguments can be made that it does not do nearly what it should. That there are many lonely people in the dorms is confirmed by numerous studies, including some excellent ones conducted by the Institute for the Study of Human Problems here. Lack of community and even hatred in the dorms are demonstrated by frequent minor incidents as well as occasional blow ups. And few people would maintain that there is much manifestation of academic or intellectual life in most Stanford dorms. Some of the solutions are not too difficult, at least in theory. There need to be more faculty members and graduate students living or spending time in the dorms. Faculty residents have not always been successful here, but usually because they have been expected to carry this on top of other loads or have not been suited for the job. Thus when the much heralded faculty master program was instituted in Wilbur five years ago, who should be picked but the one member of the committee instituting the idea who thought the proposal was a bad one. He was a warm man and a well-respected teacher, but not the type of person to be successful as the faculty resident for 700 freshman men. If students had been involved in the selection process, this mistake would almost surely have been avoided. Graduate staffing in the dorms is a problem, too, because the RA and Tutor positions have come to be viewed as nice ways to earn a lot of money while doing nothing. An effort has been made to correct this for 1970-71, but the existing situation is one that will probably take years to correct, and the ideal graduate staff member-who is adequate as an academic advisor, knows something about individual counseling, is well enough acquainted with his dorm to detect problems before they blow up and brings some program input into the house—is not likely to be found for some time. The draw system itself has turned out to be a substantial block to progress in housing. When you tell someone at Stanford today that a lot of houses are too homogeneous for certain informal types of education to take place, or that segregation is bad for freshmen because it does not expose them to upperclassmen or to much of the life of the university, the argument you are likely to get back will not be based on a conflicting theory of what is educational or beneficial, but rather just that that's what students want. The fact that there may be good options which are not offered or that some that are offered may not be conducive to the educational and emotional growth to which Stanford should be institutionally committed is thus avoided. The fact that the draw and various surveys taken during the past few years all indicate that people tend to like the kind of residence they are in, whether or not they wanted to be in it, also call into question the validity of this system. However, to argue against a system of giving students exactly what they want at any given moment is seen as an unforgivable attempt to deny them a basic freedom. But Stanford can probably have a greater influence on a student's development by improving its residence program than through any other change, and surely if there is a right to require 180 units and the fulfillment of major and distribution requirements, there is a right and even an obligation to limit residence alternatives to those which students and faculty have together determined are the best possible given Stanford's limited physical and financial resources. 322 323 WHY MORATORIUM? by John Kramer John Kramer is a junior majoring in political science. He was one of the leaders of Stanford program for the nation's Moratorium days this year. Months later, the events of the first Moratoriums locally and nationally still seem nothing less than astounding. In the mid-Peninsula alone, thousands of citizens, many of them- involved in anti-war activities for the first time, marched through downtown Palo Alto in October and through the Stanford Industrial Park in November. In October, 2500 Stanford students canvassed every neighborhood within about a fifteen mile radius of the campus; leafleted at local shopping centers, at stop lights and in the industrial park; and rode commuter trains to San Francisco. In November, students canvassed local businesses and joined 250,000 others from the west coast in a massive march in San Francisco. In late November and early December, community discussion and action groups were formed in all of the neighborhoods which students had canvassed in October. The bulk of the Moratorium's activity and manpower moved from the campus into the community. Meanwhile, students joined the community groups, maintained a campus Moratorium office, published a forum for the movement, PEACEMONGER, and brought anti-war speakers to campus. Despite feelings of justified accomplishment in creating and sustaining the largest and most broadly based political movement in Stanford and mid-Peninsula history, the question of what the Moratorium meant remains. In a sense, that question might best be answered by listing the names of the five or six thousand people who have participated. It was they, in the individual act of saying no to the war and yes to new social and political values, who constituted the essence of the Moratorium. The Moratorium was also, however, an idea which one might loosely call a philosophy. That philosophy was never apart from or in any sense above the people participating. It was, nonetheless, an extensive critique of American society. Although this philosophy was never definitely articulated (we never could have agreed upon the details had it been) it shaped both the Moratorium's tactics and the assumptions upon which those tactics were based. The Moratorium started with the knowledge that ending the war would hardly be an easy task and that even some perceptible progress in that direction would require a long and frustrating effort. That point was rather painfully underlined by President Nixon's November 3rd address. In a rhetorical coup, Nixon talked the language of peace and withdrawal. And it seemed clear that his “secret withdrawal timetable had been somewhat accelerated. But the basic problems to which we had been addressing ourselves remained: American troops would remain in Vietnam for an indefinite period; they would continue to prop up a repressive and unrepresentative military junta. The immoral, arrogant and unsound presumptions and policies of policemanship and power that led us into Vietnam, and some 48 lesser-known cases of military intervention since World War II, went essentially unchanged. And finally Nixon made little progress toward enunciating policies that would deal with the basic human needs of Southeast Asia or the United States. Nixon's unwillingness to meet our fundamental demand, or even to understand the logic of immediate and total withdrawal, presented difficult problems that the Moratorium had to begin to deal with. A massive effort like October 15 clearly put pressure on the President and other elected officials to end the war in the only way it can end: by immediate and complete withdrawal. But we also recognized that these same officials were pressured by countervailing institutional, economic and public pressures. These pressure groups would also probably like to see the war end, but not at the expense of losing South Vietnam to the National Liberation Front or at the loss of American power and influence in Southeast Asia. If the Moratorium had been willing to wait several years to prove that nothing short of withdrawal would end the killing, then our strategy would logically have been to sponsor semi-annual demonstrations aimed at reminding decision-makers here and abroad that an ever-increasing number of Americans are against the senseless policies perpetrated by the American government in Vietnam. Eventually, the troops would all be withdrawn from Vietnam. But this gradualist timetable would not have met two major problems: the daily death toll in Vietnam or the policy assumptions that have caused it. Clearly we had to deal directly with the policy of military interventionism and the attendant institutional presumptions of power and policemanship. We were not willing to wait nor could we afford to give ourselves the luxury of ignoring the related policy assumptions. Rather we concentrated on the task of building massive support and intensive activity in the community. In addition to good organization, this required considerable education, not so much to the point that the war is a bad thing, but toward the need for individual and collective action both inside and outside the political process. October 15 demonstrated that such action could have a large impact on public policy. The Moratorium's effete intellectual snobs, hard-core dissidents and professional anarchists, as Spiro Agnew would have it, demonstrated that our actions could, at least, have the effect of speeding Administration timetables for the withdrawal of limited numbers of American troops. With that lesson learned, the 325 following months concentrated on reaching groups that the government has traditionally counted on to support its interventionist policies. Housewives, small-scale businessmen and professionals, most blue-and-white-collar workers, and minority groups have not profited from the war. Specifically, they have been forced to bear a disproportionate share of the economic burden of the war in the form of high taxes, war induced inflation and astronomical interest rates. The fact that the young, and particularly minority youth, are those who are forced to do the actual dying and killing in Vietnam hardly seems to require reiteration here. Our conclusion was clearly that the academic community is by no means alone in having a vital interest in seeing that all troops be withdrawn from Vietnam nowand that these groups could be involved in the anti-war movement in greater numbers and much higher levels of activity than before. The Moratorium assumed this broadening strategy. Petitions were circulated asking the managements of firms to guarantee that places of work and study would be setting for the free exchange of ideas. Unions were approached to take a firmer stand for their rights of dissent. In the winter months, the Moratorium reached more and more students, teachers, and employees with the urging to take time from their jobs to protest the war. Businesses were urged to close for at least one day in conjunction with other demonstrations of protest. Anti-war activists were encouraged to frequent from businesses that took an anti-war stance. Stanford and other schools were encouraged, but without success, to suspend classes and research. While no institutional stance was taken, the individual initiatives of students and faculty reduced classroom attendance to 25 per cent. In addition, the Moratorium tried to involve soldiers and sailors in anti-war activities by assuring legal assistance and providing tasks. The Moratorium's numbers grew in both quantity and quality through November, with primary enthusiasm shifting to the community after December. The difficulty of sustaining the Moratorium and of achieving immediate withdrawal was intrinsic to long standing patterns of behavior ingrained in our political and economic institutions. Those patterns contributed greatly to America's involvement in Vietnam and made extrication from Vietnam more difficult. So too, they made long-term movement politics difficult to sustain. One of those factors is dehumanization. Too many major institutions in our society have left the people who work in those institutions with the feeling that they are silent cogs in a huge, uncontrollable machine. It is no accident that protest is defined as unacceptable in many large corporations; that the Administration has tried to discredit dissent with the charge that it is against the national interest; that people are afraid to speak out. These not-so-subtle silencers are the logical product of institutions that dominate individuals rather than promote individuality and individual self-realization. They are the result of factories in which few employees have a coherent notion of what they are collectively producing or for what purposes the end product of their labor will be used, much less any control over either. These failings are the result of universities and research institutes that are so structured that students, faculty and researchers, alike, find themselves working within the framework of narrow, unrelated disciplines. And they, like industrial employees, find themselves with little control over the uses to which their efforts are eventually put. These factors meant that the Moratorium had to have both a primary and a secondary focus. The primary focus, of course, was pursuit of community and political action for immediate withdrawal from Vietnam. But the secondary focus was the building of counter-institutions with more democratic forms of decision-making, more involving systems of political input, more humane forms of personal inter-relationship. The secondary focus emphasized the building of neighborhood groups: decentralized anti-war caucuses that planned activities, allowed neighbors to become acquainted, and shifted the responsibility for action and involvement to every individual. The same groups have expressed interest in an assault on environmental problems as well as the communicative neighborhood actions that, even in the short run, can change the political landscape of a congressional district, and in the long run, Washington's perceptions of public support. Although we could not realistically have expected to bring immediate and massive change to institutions and attendant mental and behavioral patterns, a task that will probably require generations, both the tactics and organization of the Moratorium were kept consistent with that goal. More important, a model was built. We established and sustained a community of spirit and action in which collective decisions were made fairly and democratically, in which there was room for anyone who genuinely desired to work for peace, and in which individual and small group creativity and spontaneity was cultivated and encouraged. Together we have already made tremendous progress toward building a successful movement. And together we can sustain and build a movement that will bring about our objectives. So let us stay together, sustain our determination and our objectives. And let us not be among those who heed Creon, An enemy can't be a friend, even when he is dead, but rather honor Antigone, My way is to share my love, not my hate. 326 dancers against 327 ON STANFORD AND AMERICA by Mona Williams Mona Williams is a junior majoring in Communications. She is from Guyana and is here on a Fulbright Scholarship. Adjustment to life at Stanford began when I entered the U.S.A. at Kennedy Internaional Airport. Disembarking from the plane, I saw huge signs directing me where to go to collect my luggage. I was constantly struggling to accustom myself to reading instructions after years at home of asking and being told, The bus leaves at... or Turn right at... I had adjusted to reading highway instructions, road maps, bus schedules, and coin machine instructions, by the time I eventually arrived at Stanford, but registration still proved as bewildering as my arrival in America. At Kennedy Airport the luggage tumbled onto a huge revolving belt and moved mechanically towards me. This signalled the unsettling beginning of my acquaintance with a highly mechanised world where term papers are typed, clothes emerge clean after tumbling in a barrel, food, change or duplicated printed matter slides effortlessly down a chute, and doors spring open if one steps on a mat. Becoming accustomed to this proved very difficult, and I seem to tempt the devil daily, and offer motorists impertinent competition by bicycling along an expressway to arrive on campus. It seems that my most intensive acclimation to American Life resulted from a home stay arranged by the Experiment in International Living. For many foreign Stanford students this experience is a high-water mark in the struggle to accommodate himself to the strange new culture encompassing his existence. I lived for four weeks with a white, middle-class American family in a conservative Bay Area suburb. They ate mainly with forks, had two 32P cars and a refrigerator but no servants, allowed a dog into the house, understood the convoluted dynamics of race relations but were almost totally unconscious of class status, and were possessed of dignified curiosity and generous spirit in dealing with a foreigner. They were all people to me. Their display of warmth, dignity and cultivation destroyed any stereotype I had developed of Americans. Stanford's reputation for wealth and academic excellence quite overwhelmed me. I expected an ostentatious dress style on the part of the students, and classes of such difficulty that I would return home by mid-quarter. The sight of large numbers of students affecting a poverty of means in dress transformed the question of wealth into a moot point; and academic excellence took on a definition which encompassed much more than facility with books. I felt motivated to an unparallelled degree to integrate my human experience into academic life. Learning, which now meant greater contact and cohesion between the various elements of the life experience, made my Stanford experience exciting and less intimidating. One memorable example of this is the Queh-Queh dance class I taught as a Senior Colloquium. Students and I approached the study of the complex social attitudes of my society by performing, then minutely examining the music, songs and body movements of my society's fertility rite. In addition. University life afforded some incidental experiences that I consider priceless. These were the opportunities to meet American students possessing myriad shades of political opinions, to experience Europe, and to mingle in an intercontinental microcosm at the International Center on campus. From the fern-like forest of experiences at Stanford, there towers a redwood: my experience of the University's youth. This remains the most profoundly moving activity of all that constitute my American experience. Never have I been plunged by Youth into an eddy of penetrating insight of a society's shortcomings, and a commingled confusion of questionable actions in setting matters right. Youth expended energy in fighting for justice, freedom and right on the one hand, while hallucinating out, commune-ing out, or just dropping out on the other. I met the idealists, the builders of a human-centered society, love-guided war protesters with a Janus face that reflected little love or compassion for the Establishment, the military, the police or the foreign investors. I was fascinated by these youth, the creators of new music, a new national social conscience, new art and a new morality. They too formed part of the band of avenging angels whose fire and brimstone could rack the nation's political consciousness as at the Chicago Democratic Convention, the judicial system as at the Chicago Seven trial, the military over questions of the draft and the war, and the institution of national racism, through B.S.U. activities. Here, in my exploration of the world of Stanford's youth, was a condensed version of the evolved truths and profundities of a Western Civ course. Most importantly. Youth dynamited my own conception of myself and of my black West Indian identity, and forced me to confront the myths, the voids, the chasms, and the terrible beauty of the question Who am I? When I now answer, I am! it represents the sum of the years before I set foot at Kennedy Airport. 329 WHY WOMEN’S LIBERATION? by Carrie Sapir Carrie Sapir is a former Stanford student and is a leader in the Women's Liberation Front. We aren't man-haters. We are Stanford women who have come together to better understand and analyze the ways in which our society has molded and misshapen us. We share an assumption of the basic equality of all human beings, male, female, black, white, brown, and yellow, but we see in our country tremendous inequalities. We see discrimination in factories, in hospitals, in courts and prisons, in schools and universities, and in families. We see inequalities in laws, in customs, and in attitudes. Our most immediate experiences of this widespread inequality are with sex discrimination. As women, we are brought up differently from our brothers. We are encouraged to be dependent on men, emotionally and materially. Marriage is glorified out of proportion. As the Pot of Gold at the end of the Rainbow, we are expect to sacrifice our self-identity, our independence, our minds and bodies, our hopes and dreams to our marriage and our husband. We are told that women can't carry responsibility, so we are given none, and delegated dull, mindless work in our jobs and households. We are the nation's nurses, secretaries, waitresses and sex symbols. Our bosses often hire us because of our skirt length or bust measurements. We are paid less than men for equivalent work and have little job security and promotion opportunity. Because we are told that our success and feminity depends on attracting men, we lose our natural confidence and self-direction. Our insecurities are exploited by advertising and mass media, because as long as we are continually dissatisfied with ourselves we will continue consuming: cosmetics, drugs, wardrobes, False eyelashes, false hairpieces, false bodies. We have come to see how the U.S. economy is kept alive and healthy by war and neurotic women. As we have examined the society around us we understand that the economic, social and psychological oppression of women is a part of the larger oppression which the capitalist system holds over its people. Under capitalism the profit needs of a few men with property and power takes priority over the needs, welfare and development of the rest of the population. In such a system social relations are hierarchical, with power and authority at the top and massive discrimination at the bottom. So the husband who has been brutalized all day at work by his foreman, comes home at night to manhandle his wife. Women are inevitably, both at home and at work, the object of such petty authoritarian behavior that our system of inequality breeds. The struggle for liberation of women is inseparable from the larger struggle for socialism. The class structure of American society which perpetuates inequality and authoritarian relationships must be overcome for discrimination against women to disappear. And within the struggle for an 330 331 economic revolution, women must be struggling to build a cultural revolution which will point the way to new behavior and new attitudes. What does this mean for us in Stanford Women's Liberation? First, it means relating our individual experiences as women to the class discrimination of the whole society. It means discussing the sexual pressures and degradations the Stanford dolly puts up with. It means talking about what happens to women when they get their BA and move out into the reality of a plastic marriage or a sterile career. It also means understanding the conditioning that both men and women have undergone throughout their lives, that channel us into socially useful and socially passive roles. As we begin to understand this process of conditioning that has taught us to mistrust ourselves, to be passive in the face of personal and social injustices, and to accept our inferior positions, we see that winning male status is not the solution. The male role in our society is just as unsatisfactory and dehumanizing: aggressive, competitive, domineering, and individualistic. We must liberate Men and Women and create new ways of relating between individuals and with our society. At Stanford we have tried to draw attention to the needs of working women, who because of their class are doubly exploited—as workers and as women. We understand that as Stanford students we have alternatives open to us that the majority of women in this country do not have. Because the liberation of women is a political and social question which challenges the whole economic structure of our society, we must cut across class lines and attempt to unite women from all classes and nationalities. For none of us can be liberated alone. Part of our program this year has been organizing Stanford employees, students and faculty to work for a free child care center, to provide for the needs of the Stanford community. Good day care is as essential for the healthy development of the child as it is for the parents. Our program also includes changes in the admissions policy, ending the quota on women and granting open admissions for national minority and working class people. We also include a section on employment: equal opportunity for women, especially national minority women, in hiring and promotion, paid maternity leave, increased appointment of women faculty, and permission for employees to take time off from work with no pay loss to take accredited Stanford courses. Women's Liberation is a way in which we can understand our individual selves and problems in our social and political context. And as the sources of our anxieties and dissatisfactions become clear, we learn to act to change our situation, and to take full responsibility for the quality of our lives and our society. 332 333 seniors Senior Class Council of Presidents 334 Senior Executive Committee The Heritage Fund is a gift of scholarship dollars collected by students from Peninsula merchants and businessmen. The scholarships are presented as a class gift from graduating seniors to incoming freshmen and sophomores. Initiated in 1955, the student organized program has helped 133 students who might otherwise not have been able to attend Stanford. With a goal of upwards of $20,000 in 1970, the Heritage Fund at Stanford represents a major application of student talent to the strengthening of educational opportunity in America. 335 First row: Jim Jenkins, Oixon Kelly, Bob Fink, Barry Ensminger, Peggy Mellor, Jim Osterholt. Sue Bailey, Second row: Andrea Hine, Assistant Bartender, Sandy Gotham, Irma Gongalez, Anita Battle, Jenny Bond, Erica Richter, Third row: The Rat, Mike Huffington Steven Abrahams James Abshcr Gregory T. Adams William R. Adams Bina Aggarvial Michael Alan Aiken Pedro Albarracin Highland Park, III. East Palo Alto San Jose Woodland Delhi. India Modesto Bogota. Colombia History Statistics Political Science Political Science Sociology Psychology Elec. Engineering John R. Alcorn David W. Aldcn Patricia Alexander James Allbrandt James A. Allen IV Jeffrey S. Allen Mary Allender Waukegan, III. Shawnee Mission, Kans. Palo Alto Lakewood, Colorado West Covina Orange Des Moines, lovw Political Science History Economics Mathematics Sociology Physics Political Science Linda Altorfcr Allison Amend David B. Anderson lathan Annand Barbara Antonchick David Antrell Robert Appleby Peoria, Illinois Taft Bellevue, Washington Coalinga Palo Alto Pittsburg Ft. Benton, Montana H, tory Psychology Economics Psychology English Biology Psychology Thomas A. Arima James Armstrong Mike Armstrong Neil Arnet John M. Arthur Michael Austin James E. Babbitt Carme' Orinda Evanston, Illinois Coral Gables, Fla. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. Sonoma Flagstaff, Arizona Mathematics English Italian Psychology Communications Mathematics Anthropology Charles Bacon Stanford Geology William Bacon San Francisco History Hal Baer San Francisco Biology Steven K. Bagwell Phoenix, Arizona History Susan Bailey San Mateo Biology Bruce Baird Norwalk History Brynn Baird Long Beach Political Science 336 Esther Ball Greg Banks Meredith Barker Geneva, Illinois Anaheim Salt Lake City, Utah Chinese Psychology Humanities Cicely Bates Anita Battle Jeffrey Bauman S. Banks Beasley Bruce W. Beck Dennis Beck Harold G. Becks Los Banos Modesto Sacramento Los Altos Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Beverly Hills Los Angeles Psychology English Biology Political Science Economics Political Science Political Science Robert 8ender Daniel G. Bennett James J. Bergman Susan C. Berryhill Bal Bhagwat Dave 8itts Randi Bjornstad Tulare Menlo Park Point Mugu San Mateo Indian Head, Md. Stockton Shedd, Oregon Indus. Engineering Statistics Biology Political Science Psychology Political Science Sociology William D. Black Whittier Sociology Lucia Biakesiee Hingham, Massachusetts English Gene D. Block Monticello, N.Y. Psychology Tori Block Vermillion, S.D. Political Science Melissa Bluemle Huntington Park English William Boelter La Canada German Jennifer Sue Bond Tucson, Arizona Political Science 337 Jeff Bonzon David Bookin Charlotto Booth Melissa Bosler Seattle, Washington Los Angeles Santa Cruz Beverly Hills Economics Economics Anthro. Psych. Engineering James K. Bower Steven S. 8owcrs Stuart Boyd Majewery Bradley Palo Alto El Cajon Idaho Falls, Idaho East Palo Alto Economics Architecture Chemistry History Rex Brandt Carla Breer Catherine Brennan Richard W. Bridges Honolulu, Hawaii LOs Angeles Atherton Ontario Economics Political Science English Indus. Engineering Robert Brody Daisy Brookes H. Kirk Brown Robert L. Brown W. Mark Brutinel John Burch Kathleen Burnett Beachwood. Ohio Los Angeles Phoenix, Arizona Long Beach Casa Grande, Arizona La Canada Oakland Psychology Psychology English Political Science Biology Psychology Psychology Dale Burns Puyallup, Washington Biology Steven D. Burton Dallas, Texas Psychology Paul Buttrey Lewiston, Idaho English Richard M. Buxton Littleton, Colorado Spanish Elizabeth Byrne Malin, Oregon Humanities John T. Byrom Memphis, Tennessee Political Science Kevin Callaghan Grand Forks, N.D. Economics 338 Ross Campbell Shelley Canter Yakima, Washington Phoenix, Arizona History Psychology Carl Cardinal I i Frank F. Carrasco Carlos J. Carrera Michael Carrigan Frank P. Carroll Monterey CBrlsbad. New Mexico New Orleans. La. Orting, Washington Fayetteville, N.Y. English Political Science Biology Political Science Engineering Livingston Carroll Kristin Carson Gale Carstarphen Hans Carstensen Diana Carter Mary C. Carter Sterling Carter Watertown, Conn. Phoenix, Arizona Cincinnati, Ohio Wynne wood. Pa. Indio Sterling. Colorado Millbrae History Political Science History Political Science Psychology History Biology Peter Cary Ricardo Castillo Bayard Catherwood Cathy Caton Sosan Challen Penny Chambers Lois Chang Bethesda, Maryland Whittier San Pedro Reno, Nevada Olympia, Washington Atherton Mountain View Psych. Economics Biology Chemistry Psychology English English Sociology Wesley Chang Cherie Charles Deborah Lee Chase Jimmy Chee Steven F. Child Paul Christensen Paul J. Christensen Honolulu, Hawaii Danville Palo Alto Hong Kong Snowmass, Colorado Rochester, Minnesota Hillsboro, Oregon History Sociology English Political Science Biology History Engineering Science Harold Chu Pierson E. Clair Stephen G. Clapp Kathryn E. Clark Joseph M. Cleary Daniel Clement Julie Clemo Pine Bluff. Arkansas Altadena Medina, Washington Crookston, Minnesota Los Angeles Pasadena Long Beach Psychology Political Science English English Biology Hist. Afro-Amer. Studies Sociology 339 Steven C. Cloud Martha Coe Diana Cohen Robert E. Colby Martin W. Col lorn Charles C. Condry Don Connolly Appleton, Wisconsin Seabrook, Texas San Bernardino Albuquerque, New Mexico Atherton Escondido Hillsborough Psychology Psychology English Psychology Economics Political Science Biology Robert Cooks on Cathy Cooper George Corbyn Carole Counihan Laurence L. Cram Steve Cronenberg Ruth Cronkite Hillsborough Lemoore Oklahoma City, Okla.Cbmbridge, Massachusetts Pacific Grove Jal, New Mexico Santa Barbara Political Science Political Science Political Science History Biology Statistics Sociology James M. Cross Raymond Cross Karen Outer Gene Cubbison Hallie Culver Douglas Cutting Elizabeth Czarkowski Portland, Oregon Fremont Denver, Colorado Palo Alto Phocni , Arizona Miles City, Montana Cicero, Illinois Psychology Political Science Psychology Communications English Psychology Russian John Daley Eugene A. Danaher Clifton E. Davidson Diane Mott Davidson Gordon K. Davidson James R. Davis Karen Davis Fresno Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Castro Valley Bcthesda, Maryland Arlington, Massachusetts Darien, Connecticut Des Moines, lowo Psychology History Economics Art History Elec. Engineering Spanish Biology Robert Debs Serena DeLotell Nicholas D. Delurgio Philip L. Denniston Laura Desmond Maurice Destouet Jane Dickerson Winnetka, Illinois Huntington Beach Glendale Rolling Hills Estate Palo Alto Los Angeles Fairfield Humanities English Psychology Elec. Engineering Biology Political Science Mathematics 340 Howard C. Dickson Cary Lee Dictoc John Dierking Richard Dillender Bob Dillon Roy V. Ditchey Lorri Ditz Baldwin Park Skokie, Illinois Bisbee, Arizona Cupertino Monrovia Riverside Palo Alto Indus. Engineering English Mechanical Engineering Political Science Elec. Engineering Biology English Steven B. Dold James G. Donart Brian Doneslcy Joan Drake John R. Dudrey Peter J. Duffy Michael Duncheon Arcadia Anaheim Culver City Arcadia Portland. Oregon Cornwall, New York Danville, Illinois History Psychology English Sociology Political Science Political Science Political Science James R. Eakin Hawthorne Elec. Engineering William Eakland La Canada Civil Engineering Cathy Easterbrook Redwood Valley Art James Easterbrook Carmel Psychology John Eckhouse Glencoe, Illinois Communications Douglas Eddy Courtland Economics David C. Edwards Morristown, N J. Political Science Jay Egan Lakewood Economics 341 William Ellsworth Tulsa, Oklahoma Physics Greg Engel Riverside Economics Barry Ensminger Burbank Political Science Alfred H. Escofficr Henry Eu Sylvia Evans T. Michael Ewing Burlingame Hong Kong West Medford, Mass. Lompoc Art History Psychology History Mechanical Engineering Heidi Facer Carol Sue Fagan Douglas Fairbairn Lafayette Phoenix, Arizona Pasadena Psychology Biology Elec. Engineering Nancy Daryl Farber Marcee Fareed Katherine Farrell Portola Valley Los Angeles Los Altos Hills History Biology History G. Nicholas Farwell Dick Fenske James R. Ferguson San Francisco San Gabriel Concord History History Mathematics Terry Ferrari Los Altos Hills History Alfrod Ferrer Lawton, Oklahoma Political Science Noel Ferris Sacramento English 342 Louis C. Fierro Patricia Figonc Rauls C. Finger Richard J. Fink Robert I. Fink Jeffrey C. Fisher Don Fisichella Conyngham, Pa. San Jose Los Altos Fremont St. Paul, Minnesota Tucson, Arizona Woodland Psychology History History History Psychology Mathematics Psycholog Carolyn Fitzmaurice Steve Flannery Julie Focrstcr Greg Ford Stephen P. Fortmann Larry M. Fortune Mary Agnes Foucault Oakland Downey Wausau, Wisconsin Stanford Burbank Fresno Palo Alto Psychology Elec. Engineering Biology Biology Biology Political Science Psychology Marcia Fowler Forrest Russel Frank Charles Freeman Cynthia Fry Ted Fuetsch Ron Fujikawa Chuck Fulkerson Colorado Springs, Colo.Bellingham, Washington Longview, Washington Shawnee Mission, Kans. 8loomfield. Conn. Long Beach Roxbury, Connecticut Anthropology Political Science Political Science Political Science Design Engineering Political Science Anthropology Martin Furmanski 8etsy T. Fyfe Gary Garland David E. Garza Glenn Gee Robert C. Gibson Betsy Gilchrist Hermosa Beach Kenilworth, Illinois North Highlands Monterey Park Daly City Long Beach Huntington Harbour Medical Microbiology History Psychology History Elec. Engineering History Psychology Maggie Gluek Wayzata, Minnesota English C. J. Neil Golden Los Angeles Economics Raymond Gong Castroville Political Science Irma Gonzalez Tucson, Arizona History Gini Good Arcadia Historv Linda Goodman Jack Goralnik Lincolnwood, Illinois Clayton, Missouri Art Civil Engineering 343 Sandra Gotham Randall K. Gould Margaret L. Graves Barbara Gray Larry Gray Deeling Gregory William M. Griffith La Jolla Medina, Washington San Mateo Sherman Oaks Bend, Oregon Honolulu, Hawaii Glendale English Psychology Nursing History Political Science Art Mathematics Ann Griffiths Fort Bragg Psychology Nancy Grisham Redding History Commun. Jcrrold W. Grossman Arlington, Virginia Mathematics John P. Grubc Aurora, Illinois Political Science Steven Haas Leawood, Kansas Political Science Tay Haines Olga M. Hajek Altadena Burbank English Anthropology Glenn Hamamura William Hamill Wahiawa, Hawaii Houston, Texas Elec. Engineering Mechanical Engineering Karen Hamilton Margi Hamilton Houston, Texas Yuba City Mathematics Nursing Kathleen Hamm Steven Hamman Janice B. Hannagon Barbara Hanson Charles L. Hardin Gale Harrington Stephen C. Harrington Palos Verdes Estates Salem, Oregon Delano Albuquerque, N.M. Huntington Beach Oakland Menlo Park English Biology English Biology Philosophy Political Science Psychology 344 John M. Harris Ronald M. Harris Steven Harris Antony Harrison William D. Harrison Dorothy Hartley Katharine Hasten Houston, Texas Berkeley Or in da Minneapolis, Minn. Patterson Tacoma, Washington San Marino Biology Biology Biology English Sociology Communications En ish Elizabeth Hastorf Lynda Haute Kathleen L. Hayes Thomas Heffelfinger Ronald A. Hellekson Richard P. Helliv ll Janice Henderson Stanford Sacramento Imperial Beach Minneapolis, Minn. Redding Palo Alto Portola Valley Sociology Nursing Nursing History Mechanical Engineering Elec. Engineering Nursing Barry Hennings Judy Higuchi Herbert Hill Lawrence Hill Carol Hinkley Dean R. Hirabeyashi Karen Ho Orange Watsonville Wellesley, Mass. Rolling Hills Kentfield Kalaheo, Hawaii Aiea, Hawaii Economics Psychology Economics Political Science Sociology Biology Physics Donnis Hobson Winnetka, Illinois Psychology Herb Hogue Saratoga Civil Engineering Carolyn Holmes Los Altos Nursing Denise Holmes San Jose English Marshall Holstrom Chicago. Illinois Biology Sally J. Horton Los Angeles Political Science Gary Hoshiyama San Francisco English Alan Houghton Lyme. Connecticut Anthropology John Houghton Stanford Geology Charlene Hsu Millbrae Psychology Mary Hueners Wilton. Connecticut Psychology Michael Huffington Houston, Texas Engr. Economics Mary Qare Hummer Rossford, Ohio English Sally Humphrey Wichita Falls, Texas English 345 Alice Decker Hunter Linda Hussey Don Ingram Gregory Jacobs Stephen Jacobs Susan Jagd Audrey Charlotte Jaques New Canaan, Conn. Dayton, Ohio Pacific Palisades Sebastopol Orland Los Angeles Escondido Biology Psychology History English Economics Economics Psychology James P. Jenkins Barbara Johnson Brent Johnson David L. Johnson Henry C. L. Johnson Julie Elise Johnson Leslie Johnson Glen Ridge, N.J. La Jolla Powell, Wyoming Aptos Greenwich, Conn. Redwood City Orinda English Mathematics Indus. Engineering Psychology Humanities Political Science Psychology Michael R. Jolley Cindy Jones Nancy Jones Steven L. Jones Thomas W. Jones Peter D. Jordan Stephen Jordan Scottsdale, Arizona Indianapolis, Indiana Seattle, Washington Vashon, Washington Santa Barbara Portola Valley Brawley Economics Math. Psychology Anthropology Economics Psychology History Economics Lee R. Juckett Paul Kaplan Kenneth D. Karlin Berton T. Kato Birute Kazlauskas David Keefer Cincy Keller Portland, Oregon Torrance Palo Alto Honolulu, Hawaii Los Angeles Arvada, Colorado Hinsdale, Illinois Psychology Biology Chemistry Economics Statistics Geology German Philip A. Keller Long Beach Economics William Kendall Los Altos History John L. King 8akersfield Political Science Ken King Pittsburgh, Pa. Biology Paula Kinsella Oakbrook, Illinois Political Science Mary Kircher Long Beach Psychology Charlotte Kline Cheyenne, Wyoming Art History 346 John Knitfit Pamela Knudson Elizabeth Kooker Stephen S. Korpi Anne P. Kortlander James L. Kramer AJondo P. Kretz Dixon Seattle, Washington Lomita Leawood, Kansas Palo Alto Fort Dodge, Iowa Squamous, Missouri En ish Philosophy Art History Economics Art Political Science Philosophy Russell Kridel Kay Kuhl Michael Kuhl Englewood, N.J. Concord Plymouth Political Science Economics Economics Michael Kuramoto Frances M. Kurisu Philip Laird Pasadena Honolulu, Hawaii Fresno English Mathematics History David Lam Steve Langdon Donald R. Lannin Vancouver, Canada Anchorage, Alaska St. Paul, Minnesota Psychology Psychology Biology Michael J. Lapsys David Lash Tracy San Jose Political Science English Gary Lassen Mesa, Arizona Psychology Lawrence A. Lawyer Orinda Geophysics John Leafgren DuBois. Pennsylvania Elec. Engineering Gordon E. Lee Portland, Oregon Psychology Phyllis Lee Honolulu, Hawaii Mathematics 347 Robert H. Logan Palos Verdes Estates Political Science Patsy Lecuwcnburg Salt Lake Gty, Utah English John W. Lewis Richland, Washington Physics Ooriana Lehncr Los Angeles Anthropology Kristi Leydecker Los Altos History Rick Leicher Evendalo, Ohio Aero. Astronautics Anthony B. Lettunich Wing N. Leung Catharine K. Levinson Hermosa Beach Hong Kong Cincinnati, Ohio Political Science Mechanical Engineering Art History Henry Levinson Cincinnati, Ohio Humanities Dan R. Lightfoot Santa Rosa Psychology Larry Allen Lincoln Sacramento Elec. Engineering Gary Lindsey Chula Vista Communications Harold Linkc Salt Lake Gty. Utah Gvil Engineering Zoe Lofgrcn Palo Alto Political Science Nadya Luck Menlo Park Political Science Shirley Luehring Mill Valley German Diane Luttner Lynwood Biology Phillip C. Lyir� Orangeburg, S.C. History Christopher Lynn Los Gatos History Nancy Lyon Los Altos Anthropology William Maas Portland, Oregon Political Science Michael Machado Linden Economics 348 Glenn Madokoro Gary Maes Michael S. Magnus on Marta Mahoney James Mallery Susan Mallory David Mantooth Irving, Texas Santa Ana Whittier West Covina Seattle. Washington San Marino Alameda Chemistry Political Science Political Science En ish Political Science Mathematics Political Science Linda Marks Mike Masarie Paul Mascovich Laura J. Masunaga Phillip E. Mathcwson John Matoian Ellen Mayhcw Los Angeles Burlingame Mountain View Denver, Colorado Tacoma, Washington Fresno Los Angeles History History Biology Anthropology History English Mathematics Lawrence G. McBride Terence McBride Thomas McCarthy Kimo McCormick Pam McCormick Douglas McCutcheon David McDonald Tucson, Arizona Ridgewood, N J. Kentfield San Marino San Marino Encino Calgary, Canada English History Biology English Political Science Physics Mathematics Margaret McGaughey Anne McGilvray Gale McLain Edward McLaughlin Neil McMahon Jim McMonagle Nancy McNabb New York, New York Santa Monica San Marino Los Angeles Fernandina Beach, Fla. Campbell San Marino Political Science History Psychology Indus. Engineering Psychology Chemistry History Susan Me Nary Torrance Psychology William McPhaul Yosemite English Peggy Mellor Corona Psychology Michael C. Merchant Anaheim Elec. Engineering Luis J. Mesa Bogota, Colombii Economics Katharine Coe Meyer Palo Alto History Sandy Mileski Tucson. Arizona Psychology 349 Bill Miller Craig L. Miller Robert Miller Mary Elizabeth Milwid Diane Miner Dilip-Kumar Mirchandani Nancy Mitchell Dallas, Texas Seattle, Washington Pittsburgh, Pa. Winnetka, Illinois Glendale Manila, Philippines La Canada Psychology History History Psychology English Communications Statistics Judith Mivwa Kapaa, Havwii Biology Stephen Moc Gary S. Montante Areata San Carlos History Mathematics Leonard Moore Marilyn Moore Shawn Moore Thomas Moore Hemet Los Angeles Wolcott, Connecticut Darien, Connecticut Biology English Political Science History Winnie Moran Cynthia Moreton Dennis l. Morrow South Pasadena Wickenburg, Arizona Rcdficld, Iowa Statistics Biology Communications Emi Moulton Thann Moy Keiji Muranaga Spanaway, Washington Evanston, Illinois San Mateo Biology Psychology Elec. Engineering Leroy F. Mutant Pam Nabseth Lillian Nakagawa Smith Flats, Wash. Newton, Massachusetts Wahiawa. Hawaii Psychology English Japanese 350 Robert Neely James Neff Sue Neil Katherine Neill Michael C. Nelson Peter A. Nelson Steve Nelson Tempo Arizona Pasco. Washington St. Louis. Missouri Wayland, Mass. Denver. Colorado Atherton Oakland Elec. Engineering Political Science Communications English English Geology Biology Economics Betsy Neville Carol A. Newman Mary Jeanne Newton William Niccolls Alex M. Nicholson Jim Nickoloff Thomas J. Nicola Los Angeles Kansas City. Missouri Pittsburgh, Pa. Ross Nashville, Tennessee Sierra Madre Bismarck, N. Dak. History Medical Microbiology History Political Science Philosophy History Political Science Gary Niemcycr Henry F. Norberg Christopher Norgaord Carol Ann Norman Thomas A. North Marc Nuvwr Kathy O'Grady Palos Verdes Estates Palo Alto Denver, Colorado Ross Shaker Heights, Ohio Buffalo. New York Salinas Eloc. Engineering Psychology Political Science Biology Elec. Engineering Biological Sciences Speech-Drama Mary V. O'Hare Hilde Olds Dianne M. Oliver Kristin Olsen Robert George O'Mcally May Ling Ong David Orchard Tucson, Arizona Boring, Oregon Santa Barbara Meadovvbrook, Pa. Washington, D.C. Holbrook, Arizona Carmichael Communications Psychology Psychology Psychology English Chinese History Greg Osborn Miguel H. Osborne James W. Os ter holt Marta Ostertoh Vince Otte Richard Ouellette Jay Colin Owens Culver, Indiana San Francisco. Panama Santa Monica Ross Sacramento Somersworth, N.H. Tulsa. Oklahoma Psychology Spanish History English History Statistics Biology 351 Bruce Palmer Stephanie Palmer Gary Pape Charles M. Parker Phillip Passafuime Pam Patty Joan Pearson Novato Beverly Hills Eugene, Oregon Grand Junction, Colo. San Jose Lebec Stanford History Mathematics Economics English Political Science English English Steve Pearson Roger D. Percy John Perez Dennis Perluss Michael Porrone Douglas Perry Herbert A. Perry Newport Beach Washington, D.C. Westley Sacramento Fairbanks, Alaska Omaha, Nebraska Palo Alto Psychology Sociology History History Biology Civil Engineering History Rod Perry Michael M. Pete Craig E. Peterson Eric G. Peterson John Peterson Thomas K. Peterson Brent Petty Geneva, Switzerland Enumclaw, Wash. Salt Lake City, Utah Corona Del Mar Topeka San Mateo Salt Lake City, Utah English Biology Political Science History Political Science Architecture Biology Susan B. Phillips Bernard Pick Robert Pietrowski, Jr. Jena Place Linda Pollock Phillip R. Pollock Sue Polly Boulder, Colorado West Los Angeles Portola Valley Portuguese Bend San Marino Sunnyvale San Francisco Psychology History Petroleum Engineering English Italian Political Science Psychology Stephen Poohar Richmond Economics Jerry Porter Minot AFB, N. Dak. Psychology Kathy Porter Denver, Colorado Chemistry Marcia L. Porter Palo Alto Psychology Linda Potter Honolulu, Havwii History Berkeley Powell Houston, Texas English James Pridgeon Chula Vista English 352 Nancy Pritzker Tim C. Prudhd Greg Psaltis Charles R. Pyle Joanne Quan Dan Quigley James V. Quillinan Winnetka, Illinois La Mirada Tucson, Arizona Haddonfield, N J. Phoenix, Arizona Oakland Sacramento Political Science Political Science Psychology Political Science Mathematics Economics History Christopher L. Rafferty John M. Raines R. Daniel Rausch Farmington. Conn. Los AJamitos Bismarck, N.Dak. History Biology Elec. Engineering Paul Raymore John D. Reagh David Redwine Roger Reed San Francisco Longview. Washington Ft. Worth, Texas Hayti, Missouri Biology Physics Biology Political Science Joan Reel Bill Reese Hinsdale, Illinois Los Altos Hills Sociology Political Science Russell Richcda George Richmond San Francisco Los Altos Political Science Political Science Erica Richter Tucson, Arizona English Chris J. Rigos Tacoma. Washington Political Science Robert L. Rinder La Grange, Illinois Economics Robert S. Rippncr Los Angeles History Mimi Ritter Riverside Mathematics Shirley Robertson Anthony B. Rogers Oklahoma City. Okla. Venice History Hist. Afro-Amcr. Studies 353 John Rogers Pamela Rollcfson Birmingham, Michigan Seattle, Washington History Psychology H. Renton Rolph Charles Rosen Terry Ross San Francisco Riverdale, New York Pasadena Political Science Political Science Political Science Thomas M. Ross Peter Ruben Pittsburgh, Pa. Calgary, Canada Sociology Indus. Engineering James L. Ruggen Robert Rund Thomas Rundall Crockett Beech Grove, Indiana Campbell Biology Psychology History Sociology David Russell Thomas G. Russell Terry A. Rustin Walnut Creek Fresno Portland, Oregon Computer Science Philosophy Psychology Carlos Rycrson George F. Sabato James Z. Said Bogota, Colombia San Carlos Monterey Political Science Economics Mechanical Engineering Paul St. John Concord Anthropology David Sandberg Zumbrota, Minnesota German John Sanders St. Albans, Vermont Communications Linda Schlinger Altadena English Striven Schneider San Francisco Geology Matthew Schneiderman Montreal, Canada Biology Loren School Sunnyvale Mathematics 354 Hiroshi Shishido Stanford Shoor Susan Shultis Patricia Siemon Sharon Sisk Ruth C. Sitton Diane Skaug East Palo Alto Los Gatos Washington, D.C. Bakersfield Modesto Corvallis, Oregon San Jose Elec. Engineering History Biology Art History Anthropology Anthropology Mathematics Robert Schrey Redwood City Political Science Mark Schumacher Palo Alto French Douglas Seegmiller Los Alamos, N.M. Elec. Engineering Carla Senders Portland. Oregon Psychology Helen Shannon St. Louis, Missouri Art History Robert Sharpe Torrance History Pat Skeffington Carolyn Smith Elizabeth Smith Richard J. Smith Robin Smith Sharon Y. Smith Terrell D. Smith Los Altos Chicago, Illinois Mountain View San Mateo Pasadena Gary, Indiana Mountain View Political Science History English Psychology Political Science Sociology Spanish Biology Thomas Snyder Karen Solomon Linda Sonnenschein Edmund L. Souder. Ill Burnie E. Sparks Jeff Sparling Russell J. Speidel Burlington. I owe Phoenix. Arizona Orinda Redondo Beach Augusta, Georgia Los Angeles Wenatchee. Washington Chemistry Anthropology Mathematics German Psychology Political Science History Sterling Speirn Orchard Lake, Mich. Political Science Judy Stanfield Denver, Colorado French Tucker Stan wood Riverside Economics Shelley Stark Carnegie, Pennsylvania American Studies Robert Stauffer Royersford, Pa. Humanities Morton J. Stein San Francisco History Barry Steiner Bakersfield Political Science Peter M. Seymour La Jolla History William M. Stetler Michael D. Stevens James S. Stevwrt John M. Stocker Barbara Stone Sharon Stouder David A. Strausz Glendale Honolulu, Hawaii Scarsdalc, New York Chatham. New Jersey Palo Alto Fresno Pullman. Washington Indus. Engineering Psychology English Political Science Psychology History Geology Kathleen R. Stump Barbara Suckling Clayton Sundermeyer Karen Sutherland Michael Sutro Maureen Sweeney Edword K. Taapken Redding Seattle, Washington Des Moines. Iowa Costa Mesa San Francisco Pasadena Walnut Creek Psychology Psychology Statistics Psychology Psychology English Economics Ronald Tan Nancy E.Tate Vernon Taylor. Ill James Tedrow Elaine C. Tennant Herbert A. Terry Thaanum Bangkok, Thailand Atherton Vail, Colorado Son Jose Annandale. Virginia San Diego Co ddI Mathematics Political Science Geology Civil Engineering German History bociotogy John S. Thomas Fresno Psychology Gary Thompson Northfield, Illinois Psychology Susan Thompson Palo Alto Psychology Robert L Todd Franklin, Kentucky History Douglas Tom Honolulu, Hawaii Art Mary Ann Tracy Redding English Lawrence Tromut Denver, Coloradi Political Scienct '■tank TronAridge III Marvin Tseu Mark Tucker Lo« Tupper John L Tyler M. el Ifepman DenmsUye Santa Crur Los Altos Longview. Washington Millwood. Virgin.a Littleton Colorado 52 History Economics Political Science English Political Science Entfish 13,0,09 Michael Van DeVantcr Gigi Van Kuran Brent Vernon Richard M. Viken Charles Vitunac Kathy Wagner Nancy Walker Arroyo Grande Palo Alto Salt Lako City, Utah Portland. Oregon Patrick AFB, Florida Sacramento Oak Brook, Illinois Mathematics Chemistry Psychology Biology Economics Psychology Psychology Bernard Wang Nickolas Wascr Hong Kong Pasadena Physics Biology Alex N. Watt Stephen E. Webb Los Altos Hills Overland Park, Kansas Economics Psychology Morris Wee Bradley R. Weeks Bruce Weiner Rebecca Whitehouse Kenneth R. Whitten Betsy Wigton Stephanie Wildman Minneapolis, Minn. Sepulveda New York, New York Evanston, Illinois Cali mesa Rosemont, Pa. Beverly Hills English Economics Elec. Engineering English Biology Political Science English Lucy N. Wilkes Santa Barbara History Patricia Willard San Francisco Psychology Peter W. Wilson Santa Ana History Sherman Bruce Wilson Ashland, Oregon History Wayne Wilson Huntington Beach Economics Paul Winchester Bozeman, Montana Psychology Adete Windcguth Cupertino History 357 Robert W Winter Sara Wolfe Hubert Wong Warren J. Wonka Craig Wood Mark I. Wood Bonnie Woodworth West Hempstead, N.Y. Los Altos Honolulu. Hawaii Acapulco, Mexico Huntington Beach College, Alaska Wilmington, Delaware Psychology History Biology Extralegal Agronomy Civil Engineering Political Science English Diane F. Wright James F. Wright Marily Wright Anthony Wynne David Yancey Stephen J. Yoder Kathy Yorkston Santa Ana Pea Ridge, Kentucky Los Angeles Palo Alto Mountain View Studio City Milwaukie, Oregon History Aero. Astronautics History English Biology Psychology Psychology Biology Michael Yoshimura Millie Yost Kay Young Shari Young David C. Zalk Sally Zeimer Stephen Zoller Lihue, Hawaii Bloomington. Indiana Seattle, Washington Salt Lake City, Utah Excelsior, Minnesota San Mateo Mexico City, Mexico Biology History English Psychology Political Science Economics Architecture residences 359 Brainier Branner is the feeling that you can meet someone new every day in the lunch line. Branner is the feeling you had when you first looked at the 12 foot ceilings, when you found you had two roommates instead of one. It's watching Star Trek after dinner. Branner is how you felt the morning after. Branner is a sound, too. It's the steady rhythm of the grand piano; it's the popping of champagne corks at the Christmas dinner; it's the shuffling of the cards on the bridge table: it's the blare of 1.3 stereos per room. Branner is an undefeated football team, a big green lobby, a broken corridor globelight. It's missing Sunday brunch and going hungry all day. It's the rattle of the radiator. Branner is a feeling. It's the feeling you had as a freshman. 360 Hank Levine Ray Williams Missy Austin Kurt Drickamcr Bob Shur Michelle Blake Claudia Huntington Chris Roman Merritt Alden Dan Rhoades John Johnston Chris Corcoran Rod Boone Penny Janice Lowe Leslie Hills 8ob Leeper Ronnie Fishman Jane Bold Muriel Cyrus Shari Kim Reggie Sanderson 361 Kevin Antrobus, Becky Ahmann, Nan Smith, Mike Conner, Jay Hohf, Tim 8rodcrick, Bridget Rombach, Tony Curtiss, Jeff Patty, Lisa Quinn, Lcs Hall, Mary Campbell, Oebbie Cole, Becky Dillcy, Kerry Stoebner, Zoe Driscoll, Jeane Wagner, Steve Bachelder, Mickey Aguirre, Gretchen Harnnack, Erica Bergstrom, Carolyn von Hafften, Rocky Barber, Scott Burk, Rick 8eller, Al Browsard, Casey Carrigan 362 Rich Gambrel I Ed Jackson Julie Cates Kay Donaldson Sally Simonsen Laurie Kapp Keith Kintigh Donna Scurlock Paul McCauley Tish Farrell Candy Behlendorf Linda Rosenthal Mike 8enefiel Carol Wainwright John Tammen Dave Ruiz Peter Everdell Gale Carstarphien 363 John Schoenberger, Carla Kalian. Mary Neville, Dana Gioia, Brian Job, Jo Dec Catlin, Kitty Corbett, Debi Allen, Zanny Moulton, Bill Pegram, Bob Meyer, Dave Ciavarella, Dorothy McNoble, Katy Kurtz, Jay True, Peggy Bland, Joanne Molina, Linda Snyder, Fred Chotc. Mike Fletcher, Steve Watson, Larry Hummer, Sue Hanna, Ann Nakadate, Susan Hootkins, Paul Zimprich, Butch Pereira Aiondra Midnight swims. .. Homecoming Decorations ... world's largest clothesline ... 10 o'clock popcorn ... collecting house dues again ... and again ... and again ... music (?) at dinner, and all those pink uniforms at lunch ... the famous red light. .. do you really mean it? First row: Rosa Perez, Qali Hoard, Virginia Sewell, Scott 8lois, Erik Blois, Marnie Mclnnes, Helen Tognetti, Kristi Clemens, Penny Guntcrman, Polly Shouse, Jody Stern, Marcia Smith; Second row: Ann Watson, Ellen Rosenthal. Elizabeth Blois, Ella Anagick, Laura Mu maw, Shikie, Mary Hernandez, Joanne Takahashi, Marilyn Benefiel, Christine Eskola; Third row: Maureen Katemopoulos, Marilyn Garcia, Patty Willard, Betsy Marshall, Linelle Wagner, Sue Snodgrass, Sylvia Brown, Anne Novak, Mary Lou Williams, Celia Williams, Liz Garrett, Sally Hays, Helen Witter. 364 Cardenal They let men into Flo-Mo and what do they get? The Cardenal Cocks-football on the roofs-food fights in the dining room-the Ma Baker spell out-the Flaming Streak running nude in the halls-obscenities at 2:00 A.M.— Bear Baum and the intramural football team-shaving cream in Paloma's bathroom-balloons in the toilets-more obscene yells—a real cock in the courtyard—roast beef again?—another food fight. If Florence Moore could see it now, she would turn over in her grave. Dream on, Flo Mo. Dream on. First row: Bob Howell, Ron Richelieu. Richard Katsuda, Andy Frank, Scott Boughton, Paul Fong; Second row: Joe Bostic. Crayton Wanders, Tom Myer, John Yukimura, Jim Eddy, Manny Castellanos, Scott Bush; Third row: Dave Miller, Wes Hampton, Larry Granger, Steve Watkins, Gerald Chappell, Chris Avery, Rod Utley, Russ Newman, Larry Barker, Demetrics Fisher, Roy Dempsey, John Simmons, Vic Gordon, John Anderson, Dick Broberg, Don Spratt, Steve Tinker; Fourth row: Kostas Pekias, Alan Curtiss, Keith Culling, Dick Marks, Bob Pete, Tom Klein, Larry Baum, Steve Hauptman, Mike Bartholet 365 Faisan Faisan House is a second home for those of Cardenal House, in more ways than one. One-fifth of the Faisan girls survived last year's freshman dolly life in Cardenal, now infiltrated-for the first time-by men. Freshmen, to be exact. And this year's Cardenal crowd, of course, virtually lives in Faisan. Where else can the guys find a color television set... an echoing sing-in in the stairwell until 2 a.m... a way to have a captive female audience (remember the furniture piled in the main stairwell?) ... floor-to-ceiling mobiles ... cartoon-plastered bathrooms... the owner of the original Rin Tin Tin ... avid bridge players ... (too) many pre-med students to help them with their chem and bio... and professional haircuts for a quarter? Where else but Faisan! 366 First row: Nancy Schmidt, Julie Hugo, Anne Kaplan; Second row: Kathy Andrews, Sheri Cooper, Patti Kasavan, Mary Bryan, Wendy Ramagc, Barb Thompson, Mia Trompas, Dawn Donnelly, Mary Walsh; Third row: Mary Fryburger, B. Fahr, Cindi Fricscn, Mary Knutsen, Sue Achor, Judy Peters, Sally Schultz, Anita Ewing, Sarah Crawford, Cheryl Beurton, Nora Matsudu 367 Linda Locklin, Liz Czarkowski, Jennie Fricker, 8etsy Green, Sally Kurzner, Chris Talbot, Sue Achor, Janet Pickthorn, Mary Bryan, Nancy Papale, Ann Rushton, Nancy Lowenthal, Wendy Ramage, Sarah Crawford, Jane Montague Gavilan A loan—a color TV—a car home victory—two color TV's-donation-theft-none; another loan, chair, lock, alarm, siren-TV again; spreads, secret sisters, slumber parties, popcorn, cider, fires; GAVI LAN '69-a new tradition. First row: Cheryl Fong, Irene Balcar, Terry Olavarri, Sue McGrudcr, Gail Ishimatsu; Second row: Debi Ellingsen, Karen Kim, Arlene Davis, Turtle Hooker, Cindy Salisbury, Tanya Granoff, Cynthia Hampton; Third row: Jean Grubb, Karen Papanek, Cathy Bradley, Freda Wilkerson, Nancy McCormick, Melanie Reeves, Sue Oswald, Sue Lyddon, Jo Ann Johnson, Linda Wright, Karen Hamilton, Ellie Pong, Deb Dorsey, Kathy Elliot, Ann Plummer, Carol Cavanaugh, Kay Hunker 368 First row: James Toupin, Randy Gaynor, William Ziebron, Vernon Hattori, Errol Berk, Marc Allyn, Anita Hankey. Clark Nardinelli; Second row. Chris Vasquez, Fred Hemphill, Russ lenk, Joe Bowers, Neil Baker, John Zima, Steve Murray, Jay Smith; Third row. William Meyer, Kart Essiq, Noel Ryan, William Wiley, Jerry Flandro, John Lortscher, David Baker, Flandy Barnes, Louis Areneta; Fourth row. Dana Christensen, Paul Crush kin, Dan Shaw, Tim Taron, Ralph Brown, Jay Inslee 370 First row: Kathy Campbell, Marilyn Symmes, Joan Pearson, Laura Foster, Pat Stinchcomb, Jan Wezelman; Second row: Anna Durbin, Cari Davis, Wendy Wyss, Mary Barger, Sue Kemp; Third row: Jody Matuna, Birute Kazlauskas, Patsy Leeuwenburg, Jennifer Arnold, Nicl Isbrandtscn Mirlo Who knows what shadows lurk within the cloistered corridors of Stanford's last bastion of impenetrable virtue? What? . . . Huh? . . . Are you talking about Mirlo? You must be kidding! Impenetrable virtue? Times have changed, Flo Mo has gone co ed, and the Mirlo image is what each girl wants to make it. If our R.A. can be found recuperating from an evening at the Rat's at 2 A.M. in the Zete house, you know the rest of the girls can't be all that bad. Following last year's precedent, the frosh contingent of Mirlo is made up of an amazing variety of individuals who totally defy the plastic-dolly mold. The hard-core upperclass element is much in evidence, too-enough said. Dorm activities range from the hole-some pleasures of pumpkin carving, to harassing the Loro boys, to painting the dining room, to the group effort of cleaning up the many peanut-butter and honey collages with which some real sweethearts thoughtfully decorated our heads. As for the many private parties behind both closed and open doors-who knows what shadows lurk? 371 First row: Amanda Goodan, Maggie Kaplan, Sue Hatchard, Kathi McKenna, Lucy Dewell, Ann Green, Julie Forester, Valerie Clappison; Second row: Hilda Cantu, Carolyn Kremers, Rosmarie Borjon, Lissa Myers, Elsa Kircher, Nan Sdey, Ccci McRoskey, Marilyn Franzini, Carolyn Charlton. Jean Moore, Marianne Cox Paloma Eat to please yourself, dress to please others. First row: Lu Ann Hall, Cyndie Peterson, Abby Webster, Becky Potter; Second row: Mandy Reynolds, Irene Serna, Jean Sh©waiter. Kata Littlcboy, Ellen Green; Third row: Kathy Waller, Sue Gherini, Susie Meyers, Jane Almas, Coreen Ruiz, Linda Lopez, Janice Nicola, Jeannette Jones, Garlyn Milton, Ellen Ogo; Standing: Kate Mitchell, Tricia Ransom, Kathy Wiggins, Cassie Belden, Anne Coffey, Liwy Buenrostro. Cay Craig, Mary Burgess, Margaret Aloncz, Betsy Feeney, Nancy Houfek 372 Adelfa THIS IS ADELFA! There are fifty-two of us (though you'd never know it). There are Scorpios, Cancers. Tauruses, Leos, Libras, Virgos, and Pisces, an Aries, and lots more. We like firesides every week accompanied by friendship, fellowship and food. There are also special occasions like banana split parties and the Thursday Series on topics ranging through sex, abortion, and male-female relationships ... Yes, we are a diversified group. Our talents include dulcimer playing, debating, mountain climbing, sewing, knitting ... guitar playing, talking, and WOW! Living in Adelfa is a great way to relax. 373 First row: Lee Appleton, Gail Segerstrom, Sara Segerstrom, Sue Polly. Carolyn Dyor, Deborah Brooks; Second row: Deborah Gilbert, Patricia Bell, Louise Ponds; Third row: Sue Meeker, Paula Finger, Julie Fleece, Linda Hause, Carolyn Holmes, Karen Schroder, Pamela Holt, Melissa Mimi Passett, Barbara Gray. Barbara Johnson; Fourth row: Tricia Berke, Ruth Carter, Deb Martens, Sandy Robinson, Sterling Carter, Marcella Murphy, Janwyn Loy, Phyllis Gilbert Eucalypto Eucalypto, is that a tree? Or is it that crazy international family? A love-in for some. An elephant house for others. Some even call it the world in a nut shell. Conversations that wax witty. Concerned voices raised loud and clear. Protest variegated, topics from far and near-Such indeed is the fare served in therewith hope, with alacrity, sometimes even with charm. At beaches, at games, in art and in form. Snobbery, sophistication. Freedom, abandonment, and joy-They're all there in many a common ploy. And R.F.'s aplenty are strewn around like toys. Laughter, loud music, soft thoughts and seeking of beauty. These and many more are part of our ditty. In concluding, we are a microcosm of encounter. asurjg First row: Stephanie Chew, Potter Olsen, Lee Schubert, Mary Hewlett, Walter Hewlett, Michael Williams, Lois Larson, Rafael Menendez, Roy Woolsey; Second row: Mary Claire Carter, Morgan Tcmby, Melanie Bean, Rita Ebro. K. C. Park, Pet Duff, Ender Sud, Suzy Argcnti. G. S. Sidhu. Linda Parker; Third row: Roberto de Uriarte, Jorge Eduardo, Morlcy Young, Raymond Boute, Richard Hammond, Jed Hepworth, Robin Lawrence, Ron Levine, Esther Ball, Nelson Chan, Ian Smith, 8ina Aggarwal, Katherine Bowie; Fourth row: Lou Mulder, Masahiro Okuno, Ralph Bakkcnsen, Taffy Hearne, Rafael Diaz, Rob Creighton, Don Rooks, Tim Eakin, George Sheng 374 Granada This house goes on sale every Wednesday morning And is taken off the market in the afternoon You can buy a piece of it if you want to It's been good for me if it's been good to you. -Stookey and Bannard First row: Tiny Tanner. Fran Liu, Caroline Gifford, Gretchen Newburgh. Caroline NcGilvray, Roca Lau, Melissa King, Jan Henderson, Jan Hannagan, Peggy Kratka, Bonnie Koehler; Carla Senders; Second row: Margaret Ross, Edie Goldenbcrg, Sue Loper, Sue Shacklcton, Christie Frazer, Robin Rider, Joan Scheublein, Marti Ravits, Diana Delker, Mary Boyce, Mimi Ritter, Diane Luttncr 375 Magnolia First row: George Schlesinger Mitchell Smith Anthony Flores Gregg Yamanaka Second row: Larry Douglas Greg Morgan Eddie Anderson John Dudrey Glen Crawford Mike 8cvicr Herb Terry Steve Meairs 376 Glenn Crawford Bob Berry George Norton John Gallagher Steve Tipps Dave Lima Don Nielsen Chuck Wagner Kelly Price Allie Duke Sheldon Dave Seago Rocky Rodriguez ... to provide for the common defense ... 17... 42... 18. .. 201... 93... 25. .. 74. .. 304... 66... 294.. .274 332... 303... 122. .. 201... 122... 82... 81... 17... 22... 298. .. 140. .. 333... 243.. .216... 235... 203 ...239. ..253... 117... 12... 377 Naranja A blanket of lethargy has descended upon us, and even the bright flames that remain fail to pierce it. Forty days and forty nights it has not rained; only the rain will wash away the ennui. Naranja is not the same. The Open Door Policy holds only for the old hands; the old E.O.N. is dissolved and with it our focus and spirit; the fragmentation has settled in prematurely (but then perhaps the pieces will fall back together sooner also); there is a different breed upstairs (but that indeed may be an improvement-no near future marriages are to be seen). Naranja is not the same, but the difference is neither good nor bad. But it finally rained last night, and it's a beautiful day. Yes, the ennui is wearing off, and there are holes in the blanket. Naranja is not the same; let us rejoice in change for the sake of change. First row: Charlie Rosen, Keith Moxon, Valerie Maxwell, Shirley Payne, Connie Callahan, Liz Stone, Steve Brooks, Laura Bonneville, Cathy Rosenfeld, Richard Poon, Bruce Markosian; Second row: Chip Tabor, Georgia Baba, Hilde Olds, Steve Blasberg, Mike Whedbee, Lani Tashiro, Pinkie Wong, Danica Gallich, Glen Lopez, Gail Achterman; Third row: Cathy Caton, Steve Hamman, Shari Robinson, Dave Coleman, Helen Komplncr, Dave Vossbrink, Ken Bube, Mike Drennan, John Cheronis, Herman Jones, Dan Chin, Steve Pine, Danka Galich 378 Straight of face, dead of pan. All rats welcome. First row: Karyn Creighton Allison Amend Patti Barnet Ellen Bachman Second row: Joyce Lissant Pam Erickson Polly Brecht Kathy Lamon Pamela Rollefson Karen Ho Jean Kingrey Mary O'Hare Betsy Brett Phyllis Lee 379 380 jpjR Burbank Burbank has three floors of rooms, a basement, a lounge, a dining room, and most of the other things that houses are supposed to be. But Burbank is people doing what they may want to do. It's S.C.R.U.N.T. Review Boards, un-parties, Star Trek, the untouchables, and Velvet Hammers. Burbank is different people. It has other things, but it is people. First row: Lee Cjatkowski, John Mattox, Irving Fevrst, Donald Berry, Herald Ritch; Second row: Ernie Rael, Gerald Soon, Greg Calkins. Bill Faught, Maury Kruth, Rob Scott, Harries-Oichy Peterson; Third row: Keith Loken, Clark Wilson, Dave McDonald, Mike Nelson, Val Barlow, Jeff Garwin, Rick Bodcn; Fourth row: Dave Anderson, Shaun Donovan, Dave Huyette, Earl Young, Bob Shawcroft, Yutaka Shono, Mike Shocn, Kenji Nakanishi, Chuck Tribolet, Robert Jahnke, Dwight McCabe, Armen Nahapetian, Masao Sudo, Murli Multani; Fifth row: John Tillman, Chris Hendrickson, Pon Evans, Alex Montes, Miles Schlossberg, Jeff Shutt 381 Larkin A house of the people, by the people, and for the people. We, the people, stand united under the supreme figureheads of Uncle Barry Weenie, Regi, Myron, the people's advocate, and the Vulcan, Mr. Spock. We are the junior explorers of the universe, vicariously venturing through the galaxies with the real McCoy in our battle scarred star ship. But whenever Bones incurs a Niagara Falling nosebleed or the Vulcan ears show signs of becoming ingrown we, the crew of Tappa Kegga, saunter on back to earth, florescent frisbees holstered at our sides in case we be forced to protect our private brew. For brew holds sentimental value within its potent realms: without it we never would have been rid of the penguins of Notre Dame, without it we would never have had to shampoo our rug, without it the people would pass each week enveloped in their myriads of books. Bitchin' Kitchens, with its home office here in the key, cater to the graveyard shift supplying the best of Bozo Burgers and Carol Doda Onion Rings. We are a motley group with lots of moxie, composing a super conglomerate, possessing all of the characteristics of a school of perverted jellyfish. We exchange our backgrounds and translate our experiences to those who can't comprehend our initial interpretations of the past. Introverts have become extroverts; no one is an alien among us. And we hold group therapy sessions in the people's room where again we become one, adjourning only at the sound of the fire alarm for which we are usually geared anyway. We all have aspirations toward the Karl Georgi You Bitchin' Guy Award, given to him who has demonstrated his unique attributes and has made the greatest impact upon us all in the course of a week. Those who receive this the people's highest distinction shall have their names engraved in the perpetual log which rests in the Tappa Kegga Hall of Fame. So we try harder, standing together whether fascist or women's liberator since a house divided can not stand. First row: Daniel Povdison, Jess Hough. Dennis Doordan, 8ob VanNest, Bob Bernstein, Phil Revzin, Hall Daily; Second row: Bruce Chapin, Francos Liv, Craig Smith, Bob Ducommon, Shelbornc Fong, Dave 8renner, Randy Campbell, Ken Foreman, Alan Stevenson, Alex Tseng, Randy Raines, Steve Wescho, Dave Jackson, Bryan Andrews, Morris Balfour, Don Mulford, John Grether, Al Taylor, Chris Hooker, Barry Coyne. Jim Yoachim; Third row: Norman Mau, Fourth row: Paylward! Stacy Matsuura, Ed Ajuria, Dave Garcia, Jim Buser, Charlie Horn, John Johnson, Griff Weber, Bill Agnew. Wes Martin. 382 Serra Individuality—That's the real Serra House theme—and somehow, it makes the official theme of Community Service work all the better. The people here want to do their own thing. That might range from tutoring in Mt. View to singing in the stair-well, but they enjoy it so they do it. The new carpet is well used by Moratorium meetings-well used by individuals talking together. People enjoy the house being co-ed. God, could you imagine talking all night with just a group of guys-or girls? We give each other strange names-Den-Den, Cub-Cub, Monk; it all adds to individuality. We don't pretend to be a unified group-we don't agree on everything-it wouldn't work that way. We're after an interaction of individuals, not stereo-types. That's the value of Serra House. First row: Robert Goodwin, Mike Aiken. Dennis Shaver, Gretchen Schmidt, Van Dusenberry; Second row: Gillette Edmunds, Mark Rathbun, Nolan Zane, Paul Walters. Greg Phillips, Marilyn Epstein, Robert Conrad, Debbie Schenfield, Bertie Anderson; Third row: Margaret Mchauhey, John Shepherd, Uli Pratt, Brian Mclattrcy, Sylvia Yee, Gini Faller, Wes Chang, Jeanie lannucci. Belle Waring; Fourth row: Russ Speidel, Nelson Dong, Steve Bachclder, Bill Kelley, Don Christofani, Glenn Zatteiro, Peter Hock, David and Elaine Riggs, Sue Riggs, Tony Sicilliani 384 Living in Serra was discovering that the personality of a university cannot be measured and compressed between the covers of an information bulletin...that Stanford students are real people with normal problems and that no one is immune from the momentary depression and uncertainty that accompany adjustment. It was finding that this adjustment can be an exciting experience if undertaken with people who are not afraid to talk freely about their own problems...I hadn't realized how dependent we are on each other. -Serra freshman Zemmar Lenoir, Harry Moseley. Bertha Ingram, Mike Dawson, Deborah Fields, Josh Cooperman. Louis Humphrey, Seth Katz, Jeff Stillman, Kathy Peterson, Mark Rathbun, Roy Miller. Sherman McMorris, Herb Hogue, Margie Hamilton, Scott Titcsville, Jim Antognini. Lots Chang, Ginny Clapp, Matt Liffcrt, Zoe Lofyen, Bruce Heller, Sally Stillman. Mike Stillman, Mark Frciman. Nolan Zanc 385 Twain Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more deadly in the long run. Mark Twain First row: Marilyn Symmes, Jerry Grossman, Dugold Owen, Phillip Curry, Jon Nakagawara, Dan Brower, Andy Kumasaka, Una Perez, Mike Fraser, Michelle Robnett, Larry Sayare; Second row: Steve Lehman, Sue Kriegcr, Don Stucky, Ted Sorenson, Buck Gee, Katy Murphy, Dan McNabb, Bruce Cambell, Janet Narkewicz, Steve Livcscy, Nancy Nicholson, Donna Cooper, Sue Colwell; Third row: Trey Walker, Lem Johnson, Greg DePrez, Larry Granader, Kathy Foote, Mike Boyle, Jim Cunningham, Buster Hymann, John Bancroft, Martha Gibson, Martin Stoner, Fred Oakford First row: Lorrie Apt, Lyn Toribara, Michele Robnett, Katy Murphy, 8ruce Campbell, Andy Israel; Second row: Bob Farley, JoAnn Yukimura, Donna Cooper, Karen Davis, Stacy Fitzsimmons, Carl Hagenmeir, Sue Kreiger, John Coronata; Third row: Wendy Williams, Jim Powles, Martin Stoner, Karen Robbins, Debbie Smitmans, Sue Raguc, Kathy Foote, Sandy Phillips, Barb Kirby, Andy Kumasaka, Jim Cunningham, George Fong, Steve Lehman, Craig Laughton, John Bernier, Dave Zucherman; Fourth row: Nancy Nioolson, Peter Leone. Kathy Morton, Ken Lewis, Mike Epling, Jim Minton, Mark Spitler, Dan McKinney, Kathy Jennison; Fifth row: Don Stucky, Greg DePrez, Sara Clcbsch, John Ferry 387 388 First row: Robert Levine, Sally Allen, Jan Larkin, Sarah Shaw, Jeff Anderson, Al Lewis; Second row: Irene Rodarte, Cherie Chooljian, Steve Gaspar, Muffy Jewett, Wendy Birnbaum, Bruce Heller, Jeanne Johnson, Anne Eggebroten, Mark Brutinel; Third row: Don Weiner, Dan Gerken, Dave Long, Dave Graham, Bob Parkins Muir Muir is a house with many diverse and unusual personalities. However, most segments of the house are united for many stimulating activities: This place sure is horny, but that makes for a lot of noise at football games. How about a pot-corn party? Oh, Heckey dern ... the shower curtains are gone again. The 360 is down, and I haven't finished my nineteenth run yet. All right all you rich people I want you all out here for volleyball in fifteen minutes. I'd really consider taking a shower in the nude.” You can't bid that, I bid that. What you need is a bowl of chicken soup. There are 562 ties in this house, silk ties, emotional ties, spiritual ties, physical ties ... and who knows how many pipes.” Of course we haven't really gotten to the true state of affairs... Because it means something different to everyone. 389 First row: Ron Duvall, Larry Rufner, Eric Beyler, Warren Araki, Pat McGuire, Jolie Mayer; Second row: Bill Olbricht, Barbara Hanson, Oan Trullinger, Raul Sherman, Patty Devlieg; Third row: Steve Gill, Bob Povwll. Bill Nolan 390 First row: Eric Ching, Don Weiner. Dave Blake, Joel Hyatt, Paul Stutz, Sarah Show, 8orbara Meyer, Dave Simon; Second row: Neil Nemec,Susie Peterson, Mary McCarthy, Lorrie Newmark, Bruce Heller, Andy Gould, Stan's brother, Jeff Anderson Arroyo A good frolic is worth the price you pay for it.' First row: Edward Mendoza, Daniel Bowers, Robert Wilson, Kurt Van Lehn, Barr Curry, Stanley Smith, David Shulman; Second row: Richard Moskitis, Michael Nelson, John Broholm, Daniel Kojiro, Rick Lawrence, David Williams, Luis Martinez, Edison Liu, Oliver Dominick, Raymond Koski. Jesse Foster. Mark Simmons, John Reed, Gary Chumran, Mark Anderson, Michael Flieslcr, James Downs, Dan Oki, Malcolm Gordon, Rick Dickinson, Ronald Lenz, Cliff Nancarrow, Scott Harriage, William Bell, Doug Humphreys, Barton Thomas, Patrick Windham, John Huston, Thomas Rice 391 Cedro Amidst anguished and somewhat disgusted cries of Girls in Cedro?! by former residents, ninety freshman women moved in and occupied that dorm. Paint, posters, and people soon transformed the metallic rooms into home while, at the same time, their occupants went through their own individual transformations. The preliminary uncertain smiles soon disappeared and were replaced by natural expressions as each girl became accustomed to Cedro and Stanford. Finally, the baffling number of names and faces found their mates in each person's mind, and name tags were discarded. Cedro, through some rather disorganized hall-meetings, formed a comfortably disorganized joint government with Arroyo, its all-frosh men neighbor. This aspiration led to many worthwhile events such as seminars, parties, and friendships. During the year, Cedro participated as a unit in various activities while, at the same time, individuals took part in a myriad of campus events. Cedro was to each person what she needed and wanted it to be. For some a refuge; others a way station, and other a home. It remained flexible, but it was always a base for use and our studies and activities. First row: Val Ikcda, Kathryn Ogata, Renee Smith, Hisako Omori, Linda Mutschler, Leslie DeBique. Peggy Sonncnschcin, Doranna Christenson, Holly Kingsland: Second row: Pamela Sunday, Heidi Hollmann, Libby Sisk, Guynoir Kratka, Lesley Carson, Kristy Kauhanen, Lynette Moscini, Ann VanderStoep, Lisa Lemus, Ann Sjoberg, Arel Sudduth; Third row: Bonnie MacBird, Michele Miland 392 393 First Row: Reeni Maharam, Lynda Adams, Barb Dahl, Diana Jacobs, Christie Stevenson, Robbie Hervey, Chris Nordeen, Karin Borgh; Second Row: Sarah Flanagan, Janet Baatz, Arlene Camm, Teresa Waltz, Deborah Hinze, Adrienne Amundsen Madera from Thoreau: I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived. I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practice resignation, unless it was quite necessary. I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life, to cut a broad swath and shave close, to drive lief into a corner, and reduce it to its lowest terms, and, if it proved to be mean, why then to get the whole and genuine meanness of it, and publish its meanness to the world; or if it were sublime, to know it by experience, and be able to give a true account of it in my next excursion. For most men, it appears to me, are in a strange uncertainty about it, whether it is of the devil or of God, and have somewhat hastily concluded that it is the chief end of man here to 'glorify God and enjoy him forever.' from Frost: I'm going out to clean the pasture spring. I'll only stop to rake the leaves away And watch the water clear I may. I shan't be gone long. YOU COME TOO. to be happy to live well to be with ones friends this is what is important. we have not forgotten the dream. 394 First row: Arturo Silva. Rubin Rodriguez, Raul Field, Ramesh Murarka. Vancsse Wenzel I, Loren Shoof, Bill Ridge, Margie Colten Keigo Yamada; Second row: Craig Nelson, Tseuneo Ito, Phil O'Brien, Betty Ruiz, Nobuyuro Ookyo, Phil Frey; Third row: Chris Ryan, Gary Cauble, Debbie Holtzman. Robbie Granger. Lee Riley, Henry Eu, Gibor Basri, Rich Williams, Gidou Shroff, Jim Dehnert, Beth Ray, John Reeder, Angela Hawkins, Gerald Martin, Claudia Linquist. Alberto Uribe. Nancy Borstelmann, John Franklin, Carol Ahrnen, Ron Rebholtz, Bill Cooper, Maud Haimson; Fourth row: Jim Vincy, Mike Kcberlein. Hans Beck 395 Rinconada First row: Craig Packer, Ron Meyer; Second row: Ed Ryu, Forrest Piper, Tom Fenner, Steve Sowords, Randy Roth, Bob Ayers, Gordon Onaha, Mark Fryburg, Larry McKcnsie, Tom Coughlin. Richard Wong, West Clark; Third row: Jeff Deming, Don Bauhofer, John Vofmert, George Ybarra, Dave Smothers. Jon Katigi. Dennis Little. Richard Kimble. Jim Ty. Tico Ashcraft. Bob Douglas, Tom Kelsey; Fourth row: Kit Blakemore, Frank Charlton, John McCormick, Steve Goss, Pat Ruscoc, Joe Bates, Jim Haley, Mike Kam, Val Pirez, Bob Reyna. Gary Amstutz, Jerry Nelson, Dave Fircslein, Steve Matsumato, Jerry Past, Dan Furniss, Doug Mooney. Jim Jefferson, Mark Fcrber. Glen Stone. Greg Ralston. Ned Chambers; Fifth row: Mark Leighton. Gary Hau. Los Ross, Kent Henschied. Tom Weed, Dave Schmidt, Tim Noonan, Bruce Foster, Charlie Hoyt, Butch Hazlett. Chris Burke, David McMahon, Tom Muirhead, Tom Andrews Norm Kong Bob Wilson Rich Lauterio 396 Trancos a few of the guys who made it Q. - Brian l1 lift cl stood t Los Klein, Denny Colvin, Steve Co ombotto. Kim Rowell. Dave incZy- Baldwin. p v( -rdo Scott McGeary, Tim Batchclder, Greg Schwab, Mike SoboUk. Mtlas TZJZ’cZ Zrd. Jc iors N,ck Spao.h. Ph. Und. Tom Hcarfey. Dave T.p,on. Pete Han.on, First row: Jack Kunkel, Marshall Green, Jeff Wright, Queen Victoria, Scott Ethcrington, Jim Pcrloff, Bob McDonald; Second row: Lanny Dryden, Rich Hawkins, Bob Bone, Paul Mielke, Todd McCarthy, Chip Zcmpcl, Dale Parker. Paul Drexler; Third row: Randy Riese. Mark Hcrlach, Richard Rekow, Paul Mindrup, Glen Sweetnam; Fourth row: Rick Hanson, Phil Michael, Dan Green 398 Grove Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.' Dante First row: Bruce Johnson. Charlie Soibel, Tim Furst, Peggy Scott, Bruce Baird, Neil Golden, Doug McHenry, Nancy Hendrick, Isabel Runkle, Mark Hazlctt, Jim Fredrick, Rep Rankin, Sue Covey, Rich Krcitmon, Barbara Myer, Scott Feichtinger, Tom Allen, Tom Nicola, Kay Gilbertson, Katie Gerity, Bob Wiscosil, Gary Lindsay; Second row: Laurie Dyer, Sue Berryhill, Carolyn Cutrona, Caroline Peck, Debbie Rodney, Rick Mendius, Alice Magill. Jim Cross. Chris Winkle, Jane Ahearne, Dave Schlar, Cornelia 8rown, Diogenes, Pauline Laird; Third row: Rick Candelario, Bert Corelli 399 First row: Hallie Culver Janie Hubler Kim Garlin Carol Boone Second row: Priscilla Weigel Helen Murphy Debbie Simpson Connie Harriman 400 First row: Gretchen Umbcck Pam Conant Allyn Price Dawna Comey Ann Beatty Carolyn Fitzmaurica Second row: Marcia Porter Diane Miner Bev Ryder Marilyn Masten Laurie Kramer Wendy Macklin Bonnie Watts Linds Lohn Sue Thompson 401 Jordan Where is everybody? I must be missing something if nobody's here. But Poopsie everyone is happy on Sunnybrook Farm. Finals week: Is there a man sleeping in my bunk; But did you get charged for your overnight visitor? If we buy a case, we won't have to make so many runs. Forget it, no breakfast. The toilet leaked last night. And how many music majors—each shall be charged for the piano's old age pension. Where is everybody? They must be missing something if I'm the only one here. 402 First row: Jeanne Robinson, Jennifer Moran, Jill Spaulding, Eileen Gaspich, Chris Rose; Second row: Christina Wood, Liz Kennedy, Cricket Bird, Christine Cane, Sally Stacy; Third row: Christie Adams, Menda Stewart, Christie Fraser, Karen Schall, Shelley Hamlin, Elise Werner Lathrop There's a big future in plastics! It takes a Lathrop dolly to have a telephone conversation in stereo ... The more I see of men the more I like dogs (Mme. de Stake)... Lathrop is a fine one to talk ... Man on two, please ... Man on two what?? ... B.T.F., a Tahitian princess? .. . Orange and purple rugs in the same room? ... Has anyone seen a tapper?... Shoot, yes, this is the Pi Phi House ... Why am I so fat? ... What do we need a Bitch Box for? ... No, Alison, I'm not Olga ... Beta, schmeta ... So they put in new shower heads, then took away the hot water... She's lost more pierced earrings that way ... A pie in the eye is worth $50 in the punchbowl... Someone answer the phone ... Don't step on Alphonso ... You mean there's a snake in this house? ... I think there are 8,000 snakes on the Farm . .. I've simply got to start turkeying ... Where did you learn to eat pie like that? ... Now, ladies, let's vote on yogurt and cottage cheese ... Every hero is a bore at last... What's a nice girl like you doing in a place like this? ... I've got two dates for the same night and so does she, and one of our dates is with the same guy ... Ever seen a Plastic Dolly wear farmer jeans? ... Please pass everything at that end of the table... Who gets the fertility goddess next? ... I don't want it... Don't all volunteer at once ... Say little boy have you ever been to Wonderland? ... Move over, honey, the customer is always right. Bottom row: Charlotte Nye, Penny Chambers, Chris Shih, Cindy Corenman; Second row: Ethel Rehfeldt, Diana Cater, Linda Potter, Gene Kreychc, Julie Bomke; Top row: Olga Hajek, Linda Pollack, Debby Wheeler, Jane Porth, Natalie Black, Mary Ann Tracy 403 Mayfield Mayfield House, located on the scenic corner of Mayfield Ave. and Santa Ynez, is one of the finest living facilities in Christendom. Its hallowed halls ooze tradition (much to the chagrin of the domestic help). The residents of Mayfield House, all upper class upperclassmen, are hand picked by an impartial committee. Ingelligence, savoir faire, reliability and kindness are discouraged. Two essential characteristics for Mayfield admittance are an IQ in double figures and a felonious record as long as your arm. A few vital statistics about our fine establishment will aid the reader in constructing a half-slow, half-fast picture, in his own mind etc., of what Spiro Agnew, a leading government official, reputedly has called our enemies' hope. Mayfield House itself is over eight miles long and very wide, too. Sometimes it's very high, said a young man. Our house houses between 4 and 67 men depending on breaks. Aside from enthusiastic academic pursuits, Mayfield House residents, hereafter referred to as Muffins, are wonderful guys. The Muffins' greatest claim to fame is a 140-lb. tuna living on the second floor and the fact that the entire house is quickly approaching the seventh level of transcendentalism. First Third Nikkei row: Peter Muhs. John Balow, Mike Drake, Ed Souder; Second row: Bruce Shimano. Bill Kinsey, Dave Garza Doua McElwuiin Ta,, c e row: Tim Gill. Steve Bangs, Jeff Fisher. Jeff Chapman. Tom Goodhue, Brian Mitchell; Fourth row: Lance Lawson, Ron Wasmund John Berry' J m'wa 404 Roth Once upon a time in a faraway land there lived 35 girls in a house named Roth...four more than the 31 flavors of Baskin-Robbins...With their friends in the white coats they faced the world with omelettes and English muffins and pizza and cookies and...who took my yogurt again...Every so often they would invite others to share their distant home...are the Zetes for real...Sometimes their world was sad...Torrance in the aftermath of the death of a Rose...But there were always places to go...an aware night on the beach at Pescadero...They learned the value of working together...is a bear's rear really pink...of protesting together...Dan for head...of eating together...SAT Sophisticated Appetite Test...and perhaps of just being together. First row: Sue Cribori, Candid Young. Kathy Prudy. Renata Englcr; Second row: Commie Mowrcy, Stephanie Storms. Cecilia Healey, Marie Lingle. Melody Ritter, Michon Winston, Kathy Schefter. Judy Stanfield. Susi McNary, Lois Chang. Cherie Charles; Third row: Men in white coats, Linda Wetz, Qeo Prohme, Sue Booth, Carole Kay Collins, Carol Thomas, Wendy Shipley, Cote and Susan Lampshade; Fourth row: Nancy Morgan, Judy Hanks, Margi Hamilton 405 Storey Good evening, this is Bill Newsbody for GYXZ NEWS, San Francisco. Word has come from Palo Alto sources that the Storey House gang has once again embarked on a murderous sweep of the Stanford campus, theft, mayhem, and murder have been left in the path of these renowned criminals. Led by 8unny and Bod, tne Storey gang has paralyzed the huge establishment of Stanford University. With their invincible weapons of beauty, charm, ability, wit, hand grenades, and machine guns, they have become the virtual rulers of Stanford. A hysterical student, found beating his head against a building, was quoted as saying that he was getting out of this place—he could not take the trauma of living in the same neighborhood where the Storey House gang hung out. He was identified as a member of the highly respected Sigma Chi Fraternity. Our Washington correspondent asked President Nixon his feelings toward the havoc created by the gang. He responded, They have had no effect upon me. Mrs. Nixon, Tricia, and Julie smiled-David grinned. 406 First row: Dana Headapohl, Teresa Cady. Judy May. Christy Anderson, Jo Lyn Bailey. Jennifer Bond; Second row: Melissa Bosler, Michael Jenkins, Dailey Jones, Jane Morgan, Carla Breer, Karen Bjorklund. Cheryl Tonkin; Third row: Betsy Gilchrist, Susan Taylor, Anne Connelly, Shirley Standlcc. Kate Baker, Emily Ginsberg 407 408 affiliations 409 410 Alpha Delta Phi The Mother Alpha saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth and that every imagination of the thought in his heart was only evil continually. And the Mother Alpha was sorry that she had made man in the earth, and it grieved her to her heart. So the Mother Alpha said, I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the ground, man and beast and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them. But the Bad Asses found favor in the eyes of the Mother Alpha, and yea, they dwelled in the Goose forever and their pitchers ranneth over with beer. Blind Bob 6:5-8 First row: Doug Eddy, Bill Ghormley, Dick Packard, Mike Masarie, Dave Antrell, Jon Wolfe, John Capps, John Hanes III; Second row: Bridge Stuart, Dick Helliwell, Doug Fairbairn. Dave Freeman, Jim Neff, John Matoian, Chris Peterson, Chuck Murray, P. Meter, Rick Eagleston, Tom Peterson. Al Margot, Terry Fotte, Mark Willert, Jim McClatchey, John Carruth, Rob Winthrop, Clay Grcascy, Rick Bliss; Third row: Chuck Bauer, Brain Grossi, Rus Kridel, John Barry, Kurt Lofgren, John MacMillan 411 412 First row; Kent Stong, John Peterson, Pete Boutin, Walt Ackerman, Kevin Callaghan; Second row: Dave Yancey, Mike Richards, Don Pedroni, Dick Caswell, Jim Donart, Clark Jordan, Neil SchvsartZ, Bill Loveland, Jim Miotoza, John Haxo, Mike Pinkerton, Von Shipley, Shawn Moore, Terry Keene, Dave Harper; Third row: Clint Ostrander, Phil Brosterhous, Dave Gaines, Jim Vernon, John Brunsman, Bob Polk, Doug Hodell, Bill Taron Alpha Sigma Phi survived their second consecutive year in their new house. Trust the what? We entertained ourselves with exchanges, The key word is Participation intramurals, Where's the Duke? bus rides, Only seven more hours to USC champagne breakfasts, For in those days, the King's word was law card games, Play for more than you can afford to lose, and you will learn the game women, I'm sorry. Miss, but I'm with him and others. Ot's OK if you close the door, I think Our cook's name was George, Get this kitchen clean or I'll go home and get drunk and our R.A. was Mike. I didn't know that. Well now you do. Some lived off campus, The Police say we can't sleep in the parking lot and some on. Except for the bathrooms, halls, and living room, the housework has been pretty good.1 But we all learned something from Stanford Here come the red hot Bio Majors and a lot from each other. Actually, the darkest hours come just before it turns pitch black First row: Paul Mascovich, Scott Honegger, Bob Rigdon, Hillbilly Racicot; Secord row: George Gugdmann, Tom Watson, Rick Samco, Dave Clearman; Third row: Mike Richards, A1 Smith, Jim Pricket, Jeff Baker, Paul Kaplan, Brian Donesley, John Haxo, Dave Yancey, Craig Miller 413 Alpha Tau Omicron Dear Jesus give us more driving, thrashing, pulsating, pounding, pumping, steaming, gyrating, groveling, grinding, ripping, biting, writhing, screaming, gesticulating, groping, puncturing, penetrating, burning, bleching, flowing, floundering, flopping, flying, grappling, churning, lapping, slurping, sloshing, slipping, bursting, beating, clapping, roasting, seething, cripping, drilling, thundering, sheing, cramming, gouging, squashing, gurgling, smacking, undulating, oozing, percolating, squatting, panting, rupturing, dredging, drenching, thumping, throbbing, dangling, douching, foaming, charring, blistering, squeezing, titilating, lubricating, limberating, lodging, loading, lurching, quaking, torturing, trenching, tugging, threshing, scorching, twanging, hammering, smoldering, merging, entwining, invaginating, grunting, greasing, oscillating, chomping, crunching, masticulating, forging, fondling, pressing, flexing, fluxing, swelling, wedging, violating, vacillating, spuming, copulation. AMEN. First row: Pete Overly Dan Neukom Tom Weilcr Steve Abrams Second row: Larry Goodman Gregg Gittler Greg Grover Paul Fay Third row: Brian Madigan Curt Fant Don Smiegte Bob Mithun 414 415 BEER GARDEti citrtcl y KciScU L Beta Theta Pi First row: Al Ferrer, Ken McDonald, Mike David, Ted Bleymaier, Jim Burke, Rob Bush, Pete Gregg, Bob Coe, Mark Shelly, Rob Woolley; Second row: Mike Forster, Wade Killefer, Ted Nichols, Pete Crosby, Clyde Brock, Rick Fat Williams, Steve Biegenzahn, Ken Carpenter, Jim 8ottomly, Carlos Ryerson, Fred Haywood, Dave Stevenson, Paul Helms; Third row: Bill Alexander, Dave Harlan, John Moody, Jim Albrandt, Ben Smith, Jim Squcri, Marty Rosenthal, Terry McBride, Steve Bowers, Amanda Goodan 416 417 b Coe, Jim Burke, Ted Bleymaier, Car os Ryerson, Mike Davis, Bill Alexander, Rob Woolley; Second row: Steve Bregenzahn, Dave Harlan, Joe Welsh, rerrer, Terry McBride, M fce Forster, Wade Killefer; Third row: Ben Smith, Rick Williams, Pete Siebert, Fred Haywood, Pete Gregg, Ted Nichols, John ttomly, John Brock, Ken McDonald Chi Psi First row: Do bey F Iceman Mike Milburn Second row: Mike Huffington Keith Mayo John Manoogian Meatball Roger Reed Jim Eakin Steve Nelson Fred Crowe Third row: Tom Wilson Garry Clark Ron George Marc Nuwer Don Miles Barney Baycroft Fourth row: J. Lee Johnson Steve Coffee Bob Wilhelm Gory Anspach 418 John McGowan Marc Nuwer Bill Bacon Gary Clark Don Miles Steve Nelson Homer Oatman Jim Eakin Jim Crouch Brent Johnson Ryan Cox Gary Garland Bob Wilhelm Gary Anspach Andy Vanderschoot Chris Arth John Manoogian Pete Gregg Carlos Orellana Ron Shorn Jim Marshall Ken Romans Herb Hogue Paul Papanek John Medlen 419 OFF GO TNfc POltfOV TRAPPY Ar a prestigious wespeRn ytfweRsrry. We interrupt this year's Quad to present a special feature courtesy of H pIf O Phi in order to show the uninformed life at our house as it really is . . . UCIlfl Will COSMIC fMLJ H i 420 C.C. STREAMS D0WNPORQUE LflWE TOWARD OX, OUTDISTANCEIHfS PURSUERS. If I CflN’r FIND A WAy TO STOP THAT M6oT Ax' AMD ALC THE FRATERNITIES DOOMED g Mflyer x could get ir TO ZAP THE MtriONHL. IMS TEA 0... GOT PlflOCHTS AND AN 'E’ON A MOTERM THE NEXT £ AU, BECAUSE HE FAUXDTOSTUOU WHILE SUPERHEfiOIKG, WAS SAVED, BUT HADTO SPEND I SATURDAY housework periods cleaning GEARS OFF MAYFIELD AVENUE, WAS TRIED FOR DESTRUCTION OF PRC PERTy, GIVING TW£ STANFORD CHAPARRAL A CHANCE TO WRITE 1 MORE ARTICLES ON UNJUST JUSTICE, AUTHOR ARTIST OF THIS PIECE WAS LUNCHED 9U HiS BROTHERS FOR NOT USING TK£|g IDEAS. mark m PRODUcjiprj 421 422 Jim Powell, Jim Quillinan, Chuck Kitsman, Ron Bannerman, Jack Canicls, Jordan Kerner, Rob Josephs, Jim Bower, Wizard Lecp, Jerry Routh, Steve Duncan, Larry Tramutt, Dave Edson, Joe Pool, John Fellows. Larry Conway Delta Kappa Epsilon First row: Larry Fortune, Manny Cisneros, Roger Hoffman, Pete Senuty, Wizard Leep, Dave Edson, Larry Conway, Gary Atherson; Second row: Bob Downey, Dave Taylor, Jack Mason, Armando Calvo, John Manzolati, Terry Moore, Steven Coffee, Larry Tramutt ‘The Loser, Eros Reinholm; Third row: John Pratt, Jerry Routh, Jordan Kcrncr, Bill Hochn, Jim Quillinan, Steve Duncan, Ken Terry, Chuck Kitzman, Kip Hunt, Chris Morrison, Tim Toomay, Chip 8arcus. Doug Lcmpereur, Jim Bower, Rick Bridges. Fred Boms, Jeff Allyn 423 424 Stanford-Delt All-American Prospects Top: Jim Plunkett, Bob Moore. Bottom: Bob Reinhard, John Sande. Delta Tau Delta The Delt house, situated high above the campus on a hill known to many as Ml Olympus, is a shrine to competitive activity. Whether diving for a fallen Baines Burger during lunch or driving his car off the front lawn, a Delt always comes through with a winning attitude. The casual observer finds it difficult to believe that such an array of gods could be assembled into one living group at Stanford. But, the Delts have been known to overcome far greater difficulties. Standards in the house are among the very highest on campus, as exemplified by the brotherhoods selection of its most enlightened member as recipient of the annual Punch Pinero award. As a result of tradition and the high standards the hard core Delt will usually be found date-less, unless of course, he is at the sexiest girl party where his date will undoubtedly by Mary Ann Barnes, the queen of all the acrobats, garnished in green peas and able to drive trucks with ease. She lives in the hearts of all Delts and is the unanimous choice for the annual Delt Bush Award. The Delts extend the challenge to all potential gods who deem themselves worthy of ascending to Mt. Olympus. Front row: Tony Broms, Jack Alustiza. Dick Oliver, Don Alvarado, Lee Baumgartner, Mike Carrigan; Second row: Jim Hofteiser, Dave Gamble, Bruce Shoen, Al Perlee, Tom Giallonardo, Jim Colling . Dan Meagher; Third row: Tim Bclazak. Bob Nicholson, Brian Hewitt, Ken Kizer, Bob Lindley, Mike Kloos, Mile Moore, Randy Vataha, Dennis O'Neill, Bob Cookson; Fourth row: Bob Reinhard, Mark Herrero, Dave Sharp, Jeff Siemon, Leon Hartuikson. Doug Adams, Chuck Moore’ Chick Doe, Greg Sampson. Pete Lazatich, Ken Margala, John P. Sande III, Jim Kent, John Heffernan, Bruce Hemet Wilson, Ronald K. Fujikawa, Dennis Sheehan’ Bill Ha mill 425 First row: Bob Klein (R. A.), Tim Moyer, John Tatum, Chef Herman, Randy Wilkins; Second row: Rick Massimino, Don Ingram, Bart Wade; Third row: Al Matthews, Mark Collins, Tom Hazelhurst; Fourth row: Tom Heffelfinger, Steve Levine, Kim Lintner, Rob Jensen; Fifth row: Jim McPhoul, Bernie Pick; Sixth row: Hans Carstenscn, Don Barceloux, John Tyler, Brian Egolf, Vern Taylor, Kirk Brown, Kim Friese, George Corbyn, Dennis Sutro, Greg Banks, Bryan Nelson, George Brinkerhoff, Jim Dowell, Johnny Sictz; Seventh row: Paige Read, Paul Lowenstein, Rick Docker, Bruce Decker, Kevin Quist, Mark Wilson, Mark Hyde 426 Delta Upsilon Take one Pizza King, a black cat with an ulcer, a noisy nose, one bender, two racedrivers, three or more hustlers, four blond-haired, blue-eyed Israelis, Thomas Jefferson and a hedgehog. Steep slowly in a cauldron. When thoroughly mixed, add six or seven shots of Southern Comfort for spice, four broken pinball machines, a Playboy Club flag, seven quarterbacks, and a wedding. Let this sit for a few days. Avoiding the fumes, carefully measure out an endless amount of laughter, and sprinkle with several teardrops. Now throw in a color television and an M-80. Blend this with the previous mixture, and toss in a few moustaches, two jail sentences, and your favorite song. Freeze, then boil. What we have not is sixty servings of an entirely nonpotable, habit-forming, slightly carbonated cocktail with allota class. If you have difficulty creating this mixture it's only because it's impossible; but if you should happen to be in the neighborhood of the DU house, they are usually happy to give samples. If you should be successful in mastering the impossible, keep out of children's reach, dilute with water, or stay in bed. Do not induce vomiting. 427 Kappa Alpha ALL-Rightie ... that was just RUDE, you piece of... LATER ... she is not TOO sleazy ... hoggah ... bat guano ... FND ... boo-foo ... cretus (pi. creti) ... frenum ... frenal creti... cretus fetus ... the ancient and honorable order of the Brown Helmet ( one of the most beautiful girls at Stanford ) ... RAT'S ... the Lanai... Dixie Ball... the Mud Bowl-a whole house brown helmeted by another whole house ... A Return to the Womb ... the Roaring Twenties... potential intramural champions ... the new bar ... KA's.................................flaming First row: Maggnifico Bodd, Barbara Hanson; Second row: Bcv Hall, Steve Atherton, Jeff Allen, Julie Fleece; Third row: Phil Long, Steve Webb, Toni Mee, Marjorie Shuor, Jeff Garrett, Jake Owens; Fourth row: Pete Nelson, Bonnie Freshwater, Terry Brown, Rick McGarrey, Carla Tofanelli, Heidi Schliczi, Bob Evers, Joe Fra Mey, Francis Kurisu. Luis Mesa, Carolyn Kreamcrs 428 1. Betty Bottouglie, 2. Chuck Coolidge, 3. Zctc Crasher, 4. Bob Burke, 5. Shari Robinson, 6. Paul Larson, 7. Joanie Robertson, 8. Patty Dc Vlicg, 9. Don Kardong, 10. Don Cumming, 11. Carol Gonzalez, 12. Jack Krug, 13. Dennis McCarthy, 14. Carol Rosenlieb, 15. Cathy Hawgger, 16. Steve Cronenberg, 17. Mike Pete, 18. Carolyn Dunn, 19. Crickett Bird, 20. Dave Lash, 21. Ray Hart, 22. Kathy Biettchie First row: Jim Easterbrook, Larry Steckmcst, Scott Stillingcr, Stu Boyd, Steve Jones, Len Moore, Ginny Clapp; Second row: John Raines, Ross Campbell, Terry Ross, Rick Leicher, Phil Long, Dale Sanderson, Stan Bakun, Jack Robertson, Larry Butler, Jim Collins; Third Row: Don Roberts, Gary McKenzie, Steve Atherton, Steve Clapp, Wes Edmunds, Quentin Hoard, Chris Shulenbergcr, Tom McLennon, Doug Warner, Jan Horwat, Jake Owens 429 Kappa Sigma Kappa Sig is ... mini-shifazzes ... damn preppies ... track stars ... overnight parties in Carmel... junior executives of SMIP ... Hangers vs. Grabbers debates... IM B-Ball (No. 3), Water Polo (No. 1), Bowling (No. 1), Swimming (No. 1), Football (No. 13) ... parties in the City ... Food Research Engineers ... KZSU DJs ... Scavenger Hunts on Broadway ... house seminars ... Goose runs ... car rallyes with a VW winning and a Porsche last... faculty dinner guests . . . barbecues after football games ... skiing at Squaw ... booking the night before ... a SoCal surfer... an Eastern laxman ... a Midwestern hockey player... booking the night after? . .. LSJUMB ... Moratorium organizers ... Young Republicans ... parties on Skyline ... Lake Lag runs in the Spring ... ... a meaningful living group unified while diverse. First Row: John Dedmon, Rick Pettigrew, Gordon Norman, Tim Szybalski, Dennis Beck; Second row: Robert Tarun, Fred Fox, John Andrews, Tony Sanchez, Ted McCaugherty, Glenn Ford, Warner Green, Jeff Bonzon, Peter Erlichmann, Jim Rothwell, Ted Crooks 430 First row: Larry Hamberger, Dave Reinhard, Alex Grillo, Marv Tseu, Jim La Briola, Doug Jacobs, Skip Provandie; Second row: Don Pickrell. Jim Kramer, Randy Write, Bob Dow, Chuck DcWitt, John Wachtel, Campbell Killefer; Third row: Dennis Barnard, Bruce Weiner, Gary Lassen, Bob Logan, Mike Schoenleiber, Dave Sturdevant, Jack Stevens, John Clewett, Rich Breeden, Ed Ehrenreich 431 Lambda Nu Ballem was our mascot... Peter Max was up against the wall... Sue was our President-that's only part of it. We called London ... Billie Shears wasn't home ... we played our stereo and found we weren't alone— there was a little more. Nine by twelve rooms succumbed to glowing candles, giant pillows, suspended chairs, wafts of smoke-we wanted to catch a feeling. We rang Atherton's doorbells when our ideals were strong ... we put a pumpkin in the pulpit where we found a lighter spirit—and we were looking for ourselves. At times we caught a glimpse of someone we knew ... caught as we lay hidden behind closed doors... sat squatting together in crowded hallways ... stood yelling insults at our pinball machine-often it was ourselves. At times we had it... at time we blew it—but we found something good at Lambda Nu. 432 First row: Greg Stephan, Lynn Hanberry, Kathy March, Priscilla Hawthorne, Martha Sward, Larry Smith; Second row: Ken Peterson, Charis Taylor, Anne Dick, Kim Kimbal, Scott Thomas, Betsey Hastorf, Cicely Bates, Susan Ott, Clare Welch; Third row: Larry Mowell, John Santa, Rob Pettengill, Dave Bookin, Wes Heitzman, Jim Ferguson, Jim Carpenter, Tom Lee, Nick Wascr, Steve Parker, Gordon Strauss, Gayle Strauss Ron Harris Betsey Hastorf Dick Jaffe Ballam John Santa Steve Parker Rob Pettcngill Harald Tom Buck Leonard Schein Dori Lehner Dave Heacock John Knight 9iaron Sisk Martha Sward Chuck Alston Clare Welch Dave Bookin Wes Heitzman 433 Tlil Delta Ifieta 434 ■ « 435 You're either on the bus or off the bus. Phi Gamma Delta (Fiji) First row: John Strong, Tom Peterson, Chris Peck, Sandy Perry, J. B. Wiliams; Second row: John Rice, Dave Hicks, Reid MacDonald, Pat Harman, Stove Poohar, Peter Pcrvcrc, Rod Lewis, Tom North, Art Hudson, Topper Lynn, Phil Dcnniston, Dave Richardson; Third row: Tom Funkhauscr, Keith Cummings, J. B. Moore, Fred Lonsdale, David Rowe, Mike McConnell, Charlie White, Henry Sayre, Will LaValle, Joe Quinta, Rcnn Rhodes, Tom McLcanan, John Noyes, Chris McGriff, Dave Denton, Stan Passarcll, Harry Black, Rich Merwin 436 Phi Kappa Psi I can only speak for myself, I suppose, and to me this house is seclusion and quiet and even beauty. We have a parking lot full of backyard mechanics, fireplaces throughout, and a roof for viewing. I particularly like the mornings. Then it's trees everywhere and freshness. True, there are locks on the doors now and I'm sure the fire marshall sees the house as anything but picturesque, but that's OK. As far as I'm concerned. First Row: Don Warkinton Tom Smal Ray Oleson Dave Steinberg Second Row: Jim Morris Robin Fry Marty Gel bard Minoru Okamoto Gail Smith Mike 8oreing 437 Phi Kappa Sigma This house is your main hard-core fraternity. We have keggers and invite the doilies to all of our functions. We like the dollies. All of the brothers have great times together telling old jokes and singing funny songs. We are all together-all for one and one for all. In the spirit of brotherhood, we stand on the front porch and mingle freely with the passers-by. At football games, sporting brown helmets, fraternity blazers, and pin-striped boxers, we sit together yelling in unity in support of our team. As Registration Day draws near we bring our Tom Collinses over to the girls dorms and help the dollies with their luggage. During the quarter we alternate serenading, in true fraternal fashion of course. Storey and Lathrop house-the girls complain, but we know they love it. Being nice guys of necessity requires that we follow stringently the fraternal format: removing the phone from the hook during house meetings, dinging people we don't like, and pledging only the highest calibre of personage. This is a defecated representation of Delta Uoops... I mean Phi Kappa Sigma. Standing: Ken Philpot Ruby Lee Scott Miguel Osborne Steve Balgresky Roger Wagar Fleet Eakland Jim Derringer Greg Racl Steve Page John Alden Lew Williams Garry Preble The Painters In Tree: John Omeara Jack Goralnik Dave Anderson Tom Kidde Paul Holmes Jim Podczerwinski Tom Schumaucher John Kroener Mike Meagher Hans Dankers 8ruce Laidlaw 438 Member? of Phi Kappa Sigma: John Alden, Dave Anderson, Steve Balgrosky, Mark Beck, Young Boozer, Hovwly Bouis, Steve Burke, Jeff Burton, Bobb Case, Steve Corday, Hans Dankers, Jim Derringer, Chuck DeSieyes, Cary Dictor, Steve Dold, Fleet Eakland, Don Elbe!, John Eiger, Dan Elliot, Ron Elving, Bob Fink, John Ford. Tim Gillespie, Rick Golub, Carl Gonser, Jack Goralnik, Tom Gurnee, Don Hearn, Paul Holmes, Tom Kiddc, John Kroener, Bruce Laidlaw, David Laney, Tom Larsen, Craig Leidcrsdorf, Tony Lettunich, Craig Marinovich, Mike Meagher, Al Mencuccini, Mike Moore, Dan Morrow, Bob Moser, Doug Muchmorc, Steve Newman, Miguel Osborne, John Omeara, Matt Omeara, Steve Page, Jim Pfingstel, Ken Philpot, Jim Podcerwinski, Greg Rael, Paul Sagues, Tom Schumacher, Tom Snyder, Tom Sones, Jerry Sprout, Skip Stiver, Roger Wagar, Mike Walsh, Lew Wiliams, Tom Winslow, John Wright 439 First row: Bill Miller Ted Sicglcr Steve McChrystal Bob Gates Mark Bergstrom Alan Gillespie Second row: Bill Maas Walter Walsh Jim Lundberg Steve Carnevale Scrotic Lowry Third row: John Taylor Bruce Masse Yossarian Mark Roberts Dale Rettig Mike Wolf Phi Sigma Kappa There is no place in Phi Sigma Kappa for a man who lacks the qualities of a true gentleman; who is devoid of principle; who drinks, gambles, or swears unnecessarily or to excess; or who shows a lack of respect for his parents, the girls with whom he associates, or his brothers. -HILLS AND A STAR Phi Sigma Kappa National Pledge Handbook But we're trying to make room. 440 Above: Steve McChrystal Charles Reed-Chef Bob Gates Walt Walsh Joe Martinez Nick Miller Mark Roberts Paul Boeckerman Dennis Uycmura Bill Maas Jim Babcock John Grant Ed Leven Don Lachman Chuck Pyle Center: Hal Hothan Bruce Masse Geoff Slack 441 First row: Bill Reese, Dave Shibata, Jack Funamura. Cory Herrera, Bruce James, Ceci McRoskey, Craig Wood, Maureen Jenks; Second row: Annabelle Lee, Rob Frantz, Yvonne Wills, Mike Armstrong, Bob McOuskey, Keith Kauhancn, Julie Fleece, Les Hauge, Mike Machado; Third row: Fred Banks, Bob Hamrdla, Don Ayer, Rick McDowell, Dick Chamberlin, Dave Barber, 8ob Murphey, Jerry Gass, Bob Thompson, J. D. Fitz, Bill Boelter, Dave Schroeckenstcin, Steve Shevell, Bob Sader, Bob 8ond, Ted Prim, Doug Wilson, Tom McCoy, Dave Mantooth 442 Sigma Alpha Epsilon Generally fraternity squibs in the Quad are a jovial put-on. Unfortunately the joke is not on a gullible, witless public as intended, but on the fraternity itself. SAE takes plenty of time to laugh—at itself and at the wonderful, funny, wonderful, serious world. What we value dearly-fraternity-we won't despise through parody. For SAE, fraternity is a kind of practical, working love. If SAE's were gods we wouldn't have time for fraternity; if we were saints we wouldn't need it But as men we have trusted in fraternity to fulfill the human need of respect, dignity, and love. We seek to be different from other campus groups only in the serious bond of commitment and trust which binds us. We remain open and respectful of fraternity and other forms of Charity wherever we find it. First row: Jack Funamura, Annabelle Lee, Penny Guntermann, Dave Schroeckenstein, Greg Engel, Marti Ravits, Ron Goldhammer, Maureen Jenks, Chris Williams, Steve Haas; Second row: Wally Schirra. Christine Eskola, Linda Schlinger, Jayne Mansfield, Len Christensen, Tom Bower; Third row: Steve Tollefson, Raquel Welch, Tom Thorleifson, Greta Garbo, Dennis Feeney, Katie Lane, Marilyn Monroe, Mark Wood, Bob Sader, Chris Talbot, Craig Wood 443 Sigma Chi Omega The literary world was shocked and astounded to learn that the emminent author of child literature. Dr. Seuss, wrote his popular book. If Ran The Zoo, after making a visit to the Sigma Chi Omega house. The experience must have left such a vivid impression on the author's imagination, for many of the characters in his book are modeled directly after some of the Sigma Chi men. Indeed, one visit would confirm the impression that the House Brethren epitomize the trite but accurate expression that they are a living group whose members reflect a perversity of interests. The Magnificent Seven, The 0. T. Ragtime Travelling Band, and Bets Annonymous, are all famous groups. But perhaps the most fabled group residing in The Chi Club's quarters is the Chi Club Glee Club, whose harmonious sounds waft lightly over the campus on evenings long awaited for. One need only ask the distinguished music critics of Storey if the Glee Club's lyrics were not unusually original and amusing. First row: Alex McGilvray, Herb Hill, Jerry Dorm, Craig Bernhard, Bill Dudley, Nick Dilurgio, Sam Kurita, Tim Wong, Bob Toda; Second row: Lans Lou, Bob Slattery, Larry Rosensweig, Jim Loden, Ken Link, John Glaser, Bill Ross, Vol Van Dalsem; Third row: Paul Prissier, Mike Matlock, Steve Kukenbeckcr, Jim Merril, Bob Mallcck, Steve Dunning, Walker Wainwright, Mike Ewing, Nip Grey, Bob Pringle, Carl Anderson, Bob Capeloni, Greg Jacobs; Fourth row: Steve Barlow, Ken Weed, Hank Snider, Bob Hoffman, Bill Markwood, Jim Shrcibcr, Don Kidder, John Sheller 444 Sigma Chi Omega is also the epitome of diversity. With a finger in every pie, the Chis spread their notorious talents throughout the campus-from the hollowed halls of the student senate to the neatly manicured infield of the baseball diamond. Even char-itious activities are not overlooked, as the brothers recently adopted two homeless waifs and took them to their hearts. Although quaintly named Butch and Sundance, the two have quickly become two of the most notorious members of the Chi Club. First row: Nip Grey, Chris Fletcher, Sam Kurita, Tim Wong, Lee Fair, Craig Bernhard, Bob Toda, Steve Kuchenbecker, Greg Osborne, Larry Rosenzwcig, Allan Christenson; Second row: Bob Sharpe, Henry Grossman, Oswald Kaufman, Walt Switzer, Paul Preissler, Don Ross, Nick Dclurgio, Bob Belden, Doug Grey, Bill Markwood, Hank Snider, Mike Nakata; Third row: Vol Van Dalscm, Jerry Darm, Steve Barlow, Jim Merril, Bob Ctpeloni, Pat Shea, Bill Ross, Don Kidder Inspite of all their varied activities on and off the campus, the men of Sigma Chi Omega still enjoy, above all, the leisurely return to their stately and comfortable loggings at 550 Lasuen Way, where they find their friends ready and waiting with witty repartee, and good natured bantering, the very hallmark ingredients of relevant living. 445 Front: Mike McClure Second row: Al Hails Pete Wilson Third row: Nori Okaido Jim Gray Bob Dillon Don Jer Fourth row: Tom Folsom Greg Psaltis Tom Arima First row: Fred Clarke, Tom Folsom, Mike McClure, Jim Gray, Bob Dillon, Morris Wee; Second row: Phil Croyle, Pete Wilson, Terry Murphy, John Bell, Bob Neely, Larry Papale, Dave Strauss, Greg Painter, Tom Arima, John Stocker; Third row: John Ritchey, Greg Psaltis, Al Hails, Steve Jordan, Ed Bergo, Dave Reeves, Hal Daseking, Tim Prudhel, Ron Hellekson. 446 Theta Chi It is to Thee, dear old Theta Chi, that I humbly address these few impotent words-an attempt to render immortal on sterile page that which can never be but immortal in our hearts, the continuing sage of Brotherhood and the Pursuit of Truth engendered with Thy walls—nay, within the fluid Essence which is Thy Character-a sage irreversibly and uncontrollably osmosed into my being by the diurnal intimacy of red tile pressuring against my foot palms before either white tribunal, a sage never to be understood as the mere consummation of the events of three flitting years, events which now pass before my mind with the speed and transcience of the legs of the Theta Chi harriers in heated pursuit of yet better men, or with that of a very short train. With Thy help, O Theos Charitas, have we been enabled to loosen the encumbering belt of society's mores and stimulate our feeling of freedom and potential. Within a circle of friends the secret ritual which is thy namesake has helped raise a foundation to friendship which the winds of time will not easily blow asunder. With a warm, softening nastalgia I review my Attic Experiences with a cigarette, cries of “HATCHET!! flowing in the orifices of my brain: the great House Functions which ever arise in reminiscence. The erection of homecoming decs, the sublime efforts of our intramural teams, oh! the exhibitions of creative genius by various members in the Great Front Lawn Affair, B. D., hilarious variations in coat and tie, unified peace efforts; and girls, oh yes, those Stanford lovelies, those girls ... Oh Men of Men, standing tall and stiff in that Attitude of Excellence, may you ever thoroughly cherish the memory of that institution which soon you must thrust arrears, and the lessons it has taught, ever rejecting the fallacies of rigid idealogies; that whenever you find one standing in hardship, you come to his aid with a helping hand. 447 Theta Delta Chi This was going to be a story about a tall slinky blonde chick named Leda who, like the Venus de Milo, was created lacking both arms, and, sadly, blind as Oedipus Rex in Act V. Anyway, this was to be Leda's story; the story of her awakening into desire as the sap rose and her blood warmed, and her subsequent search for fulfillment with a seeing eye dog named Helmut, and later, with a prosthesis salesman named Jerome. But I see now it can't be. It is instead the story of the sensitive and virile German shepherd that lead her on her odyssey into being, and his dilemma of trying to attatch himself politely to an angel absolutely devoid of arms, hands, and fingers. But like Oedipus' story, ours is a tragic one. While holding it gently, but firmly between her strong, supple teeth, Leda had pulled most of the hair out of Helmut's silky tail. His waggish wand laid bare by this marred goddess with the diaphanous mind who could never be his, the noble canine left in a huff, leaving George with only a mouthful of fur and a matched set of Prussian fleas to call her own. Perhaps it is Jerome's story after all: the quest of a polite, myopic Jewish boy for torpid passion within the framework of a mother image. It was his inept attempt to politely attatch his prosthesis to this vision of loveliness far beyond his wildest dreams that lead to the failure of their amours. Appalled by the results of Jerome's hard sell, and disillusioned with mammals in general, Leda renounced the company of her own kind to wander through the forests and bathe in the lakes of a nearby game preserve. Still, it might be the tale of the degenerate swan who ... but that's another story. ,r t row: R0||y Sandberg, Bob HeilrJrn peter ; Second row: Doug Peart, John Murphy, Chris Rafferty, Brian Morgan, Berkeley Powell, Mort Stein, Dave Rfth Rinnan rv Ormond, Bob Marshall, Don Docheff, Allen Hillel. Bob Kirschner, Claude Terry, Flip Gianos, Fred Cruz; Third row: Mike Ashton, UIJ nippnef, Utck Kasbeer, Dick Andersen, Dave Barnhill, Kevin Washington, Jim Bishop, Bob Miller. Greg Larsen, Gordy Davidson, Dave Shank. Larry Cram, Chris Rwjhch, Bob Stauffer, Gary Bagdasarian, Rob Daugherty, Tucker Stanwood, Jamie Armstrong, Steve Combs, Ross Laybourn, Brad Lind, Bill Freivogcl, Alan Proctor, Mike Quinn, Scott Burns. Davo Chambers, Pete Jensen. John Eckhouse 448 449 450 First row: Bill Moriarty Doug Raff Bill Kondrat Jim Almas Dave Heesen Arturo Riojas Second row: Mike Snyder Tony Lambert Chris Rigos Bill Gibson Third row: Charles Bruton Andrew Kille Zan Henson Tim Clock Phil Clock Peter Cary John Bianchi Robert Bender Mike Baldwin Mike Parker Hal Michelson Bruce Thom Phil Haleen Theta Xi Two snakes, two possums, three cats, a tarantula, and one lost turtle. Sinking a perfect layup on the side court basket. Knowing the words to the Stanford Fight Songs. Having Dean's Beans for Saturday brunch. A landlocked canoe. Appearing every other quarter on the Most Improved scholarship plaque. Driving you Porsche over a cliff. Driving your Cortina over a can of paint. Driving everyone crazy with your Ford Model A. Fouling out for the coach. Movie money on Rush Nights. Guffaw. The King's Krotch. The Pit. Rumblings of mutiny. A sheep ranch somewhere in Montana. Camel jokes. A metaphysical junkie. Mr. Bummer. Thou I, Tabasco sauce, Gronk, boigas, and that good Xi coffee. Twenty-five bottles of home made wine. Booking down for Bobbo. Suzy Creamcheese. Jello slurping. Goef. Theta who? 451 452 First row: Mark Twedt, Dan Scott, Younger Klippert, Bo Crane, Bruce Witmer, Chris Gibson; Second Row: Kevin Cronin, Baby Clausen, Andy Rose, Ken Koranda, Hank Kistler, Mike Leathers; Third Row: Dave Janke, Bert Mason, Slug Shallic, Tom Moore, Phil Pasafuime Zeta Psi 1. Daryl Waters, 2. Marshall Goldberg, 3. Gary Pape, 4. Mark Brown, 5. Dale Magruder, 6. Alphonse original Mu, 7. Steve Schwager, 8. Rob Towner, 9. Tom Shift, 10. Gus Shaver, 11. Tod Peterson, 12. The Gator, 13. Scott Ghormlcy, 14. Mike J. V. Phillips, 15. Mark Atkinson, 16. Tom Hornbeak, 17. Cris Gibson, 18. R. Miller, 19. Tim Evans, 20. Dave Tipton, 21. Bruce Witmcr, 22. Butto Cramblit, 23. Lt. Greg Adams, 24. Jim Ladato, 25. Sarge Wilson, 26. Mike Leathers, 27. Ted Cohrt, 28. Steve Plan, 29. Mike Shannon, 30. Steve Kistler, 31. Mar Agnew, 32. Mark Twedt, 33. Howie Williams 453 I.C.C. and Board of Managers Over the years, the seven Stanford Eating Clubs have come to be an integral part of the university. More than places to eat, they provide a friendly social atmosphere. In the past, the clubs have been in the vanguard of promoting changes at Stanford. It was the clubs v fr� o first introduced the coed idea. Since Toyon Hall, the Eating Club residence, has gone coed, the number of coeds in the clubs has increased dramatically in the six of seven clubs who now have women, and the atmosphere in both Toyon and the clubs has improved tremendously. The clubs sponsor many activities, both collectively and individually. Barbecues, champagne breakfasts, and Tom Jones parties are just a few of these successful events. The 340 club members and their dates who attended Hair last November thought it was one of the best Eating Club functions of all time. The clubs, entirely student managed, are governed by the Board of Managers and the Inter-club Council. The Board is composed of the seven club business managers and the general manager, and serves as a financial advisory board to the Council {the supreme policy-making body), which is composed of the I.C.C. president, the vice-president, and the seven club representatives (usually club presidents). This year's general managers have been Pete Still and Alan DeBakcsy, while Phil Mathewson and Evan (Spiro T.) Shaffer have filled the executive offices. The latter were also in charge of social programs in Toyon, and worked closely with the director of Toyon, Paul MacGregor, the Resident Assistants, and the faculty residents, Stan and Linda Fischman. First row: Laura Wilbur, Doug Anderson, Jim Welch; Second row: Steve Head, Evan Shaffer, Alan DeBakcsy, Phillip Mathewson; Third row: Alan Houghton, Dennis Morrow, Bernie Thurber, Brad Weeks, Corey Goodman, Paul Atkinson, Kathy Kerr, Kirk Schumacher, Mike Zadig El Campo Oh King Oliver, lord of El Campo, how great is thy name in these halls and lofts!! You are the man to whom all things are known; you are the king who knows the countries of the world. The gods created you perfect of mind and body, and you rescued us from the dark terrors of Toyon, the tomb-like halls of Cro Mem, the devastating sterility of Manzanita Park, and the far-flung lands beyond these campus walls. You cleverly guided us with your brilliant advisors. Honored Business Manager Laura Wilber, President of Political Involvement Jim Welch, Vice-President Barticus Shenone of the storied Livermore tribe, and Retired Pre-Med Social Chairman Rich Douglas. To each of these we owe our greatness and our wealth, but to none more than our king of infinite wisdom. Ye, great king who remained prudently silent during the great Moratorium uprising, and led our inebriated masses down to the sea, where we supped on the Punch of Pleasure, and purified ourselves in the restless waves. The journey to the evil City was safe by your presence. You showed us culture in the Place Pigalle, and bravely indulged our wild tribal love-in at Hair. Oh, Pink-Shirted Oliver, it is your breath of fire that cooked our food, and with the wealth of your endless plunder we bought it. Pint row: Jeff Banosian, Ron Tan, David Gilmer, Laura Wilbur. Fred Mansfield, Edie Loving, Dean Thomas, Pete Robustelli, Hal Baer, David Orlean, Chris Redburn, Mike Cleary, Robyn Young, Debbie Healy, Tina Shidler, Bruce Janger; Second row: Bart Shenone, Bill Considine, Bob Wallace, Sandy Nicholson, Craig Dickson, Bob Tomlinson, Yoshi Matsuda, Doug Seegmiller. Eric Olsen, Skip Catherwood, Martha Gibson, Pete Still. Ladene Otsuki, Rog David, Ida Reed, Craig Okino 455 Seated: Jim Clark Jim 8ergman Bob Taggart Dennis Morrow Zeus Joe Bracewell; Standing: Bev Gault Florrie Young Hugh Wong Hurent Thurber Keiji Muranaga 456 El Cuadro In the ancient empire of Elle, there lived a young king and his court. King Morerow presided over the tiny kingdom of Cuadro in a manner befitting his wisdom. Aided by his retinue of Cagey-of-the-East, Sir BabiHoward (known for his search for the Holy Jock), Bernard the Elder, and Cheeze-whiz the Cat, he became known far and wide for his goodness, courage, and other kingly qualities. But his kingdom was small-he had few subscripts-so the good king gave a huge feast to attract new tassels. Visitors from all corners of the empire flocked to Morerow's feast. There were nine quires, led by Rolfe-of-the-Dunes, tend elders from various councils afar, some from the east, others from the east. Trailing behind there visitors were fugitive serfs from the camp of Ming Manzan. Finally came the giant Stanley of Ignatz, two dwarfs, one wizard, and assordid camp followers. The feast was successful. Amidst merrymaking, singing, ailing, dancing, and storytelling, Bernard the Elder-the king's scribe-invested sixty-nine kings and ladies, two fare maidens, one dog, three toads, and one eye of newt. To this day the feast continues, as King Morerow showers his blessings up the crowds, with the following immortle injunction: Eat well, sleep Prince!” First row: Chuck Condry, Bcrnie Thurber, Connie McKee, Bcv Gault, Marge the Cook, Norm Goodman; Second Row: Jim Troxell, Tony Macias, Paulo Rocha, Rich Armstrong, Moyses Burd, Susan Ray, Shannon Larson, John Maher, Niel MacDonald, Nguyen Toai, Tovc Jensen; Third row: Eric Sasano, Don Lannin, Mike Yoshimura, Florrie Young Marybeth Fox, Don Nanney, Keiji Muraga, Jon Briskin, Stan Johnson, Joe Bracewell, Lindsay Bower, Roger Robert, Jim Bergman, Richard Kahler, Friend from Texas, Denny Morrow, Jim Cunningham, Evan Schaffer, Gary Reid 457 El Capitan Once upon a time, in the land of Standard U, lived a strange creature called the ELKAP. It had a fearsome hairy head resting on a neck that only rarely stuck out. Its body was always changing shapes. One day it was a football, but that lasted only a short while. Once it resembled a sirloin steak, but this also was rare. Mostly it resembled an odd conglomeration of human faces, arms, legs, old newspapers, colored voices and Huntley-Brunkley. The ELKAP was noted for its strange behavior, most noticeable in the form of an epileptic fit called hasher. The beast was known to have an assortment of moods. One day it could be stoned mountain high, the next a moody river deep. But it never failed to be a good provider for its family-bringing home the bacon (and groovy things it found in the great palm forest) regularly. The ELKAP is friendly and attracts human parasites, most of which are pictured here in captivity. First row: Brij Sood, Mike Kronstadt, Alan Egge, Julie Shim, Kathy Dark, Dennis Wildfogel; Second row: Greg White, Bill Sharma, Glen Fukushima, Phil Questad, Mike Cooper, Greg Obanesian; Third row: Don Marquard, Werner Graff, Craig Wilson, Ken Leone; Fourth row: Jim Partman, Terry 8acon, Nick Nicholas, Alan Gartner, Dan Siewiorek, Bill Rowon, Cedric Walker, Rachel Walker, Kaz Isogaya, Mike Becker, Joan Garvin; Fifth row: Sikander Saleem Khan, Geert Dykhuis, Jim Taber, Louis Senechaut, Bill Reichert, Don McHamess, Phil Kurjan, Kirk Schumacher, Mike Zadig, Frank Day, Nick Linsmayer, Cary Wang, Eva Neilson 458 El Tigre First row: Rick Bowers, Julie Fchring, Larry Cretan, Chris Cozzens, Claudia Cohen, Ken King, Bob Rinder, Corey Goodman, Bernie Wolf, Dave Jaffe; Second row: Margaret Garmes, Jane Baker, Bill Cooke, Jim Duree, Nick Nicholson, Bradley Weeks, Dave Ortmeyer, Ed Merril, Fred Prudek, Rick Tipton, Jonathan Kahn, John Benda: Third row: Ken Kuntzelman, Dave Damassa, Ralph Earle, George Gantz, Larry Hardin, Carl Carlson, Bill Shields, Jim 8artle, Mike Clifton, Douf McCutcheon, Leonard Busby 459 460 El Toro Sing, goddess, of the wrath of the bull Toro, the rosy-horned. Bane of brown-helmed Greeks Alien to the sacred Grove(l). Sing, Vicky, of the fair-cheeked Dolly Dancer to the Chaste Diana, Breaker of the hearts of men, Hymph o many ac cuse these. Toro, rosy-horned, journeys To the land of sacred Grove(l). Here he spies the fair-cheeked Dolly Sister of the Lotus-Eaters. Full of fury, Toro rises Strong of arm and quick of tongue Wrests her from the halls of hubris. Back to Toyon Toro travels. With his prize the fair-cheeked maid. Having pierced the walls of Grove(l) His wrath now spent, and journey ended Dance, Vicky, to the mightly horns of Toro. (Dance, Vicky) First row: Glen Hara. Bill Setler, Tom Jordan, Chuck Menz; Second row: Kirk Jensen, Jeff Bauman, Tim Nicholson, Bob Dunham, Tom Jessen, Dewitt Cheng, Mark Jones, Jim Murray, Bob Rund, Dave Whiteing, John Unman Mickey Chiu, Koji Kodama, Frank Trowbridge, Ed Heffern, Terry Anderson, Tom Hall, Bob Davis, Steve Head, Allan Debakcsy; Third row: John Tam, Dennis Mesick, Mark Wardenburg. Carroll Joynes; In tree: Tom Ross 461 First row: A1 Houghton Kent Crispin Steve Sternfeld Angie Baldo Dave Gorschoff Al Cristaldo Carolyn Fisher Linda Gibson Albert Perez Second row: Carol Hiltman Rick Ganeviwal Terry Gould Dave Emerson Maria Montenegro Nick Baldasari Miguel Lujan Len Smith Tom Friberg Karen Tanaka Dan Prendergast Craig Floyd Mark Smith Marianne Taylor Barry Sudderth Tom Gibson Jeff Hoefft Jim Maylie Stan Tenold Ralph Heimlich John Washburn 462 Los Arcos Tommy R. had a tough act to follow. The spring before he'd only been a cog in the Big A's powerful softball machine which won the El (and fell on its tail in the playoffs) but now as coach of the pigskin unit he had a streak to keep going. The situation looked promising after a muddy opener, but Game 2, against Toro, was a disaster: Arthur got smashed and Schwall was hurt, too and there went the streak. All, of course, was not lost. A few candlelit dinners and Champagne Breakfasts-set-to-music (thanx, Maria) later The World's Greatest Eating Club was roaring along once again. Ding-a-lirtging the din into temporary submission the Pres (a mere figurehead) called on Paul to measure the influence of the fish lobby and had A.B.M. Jago (as much of an institution as Roy the Court Jester) explain his complex lottery for the Hair tix. Shirley, meanwhile, had her massive cultural program rolling along accordion to schedule and so even without Merchant things worked in the fall. Vince asked if he could enter his team of World's Fastest hashers in the I.M. track meet and Al the Chief said Johnny needed a mechanic in the kitchen to service all the new machinery. Paul the Lawyer called for jurors, but this tidbit was lost on the coffee drinkers from South of the Border and the football throwers from West of the Date Line, not to mention the hoards of CBSers who thronged into the lounge when it was all over. Arcos was just too diverse for summation. 463 First Row: Jeff Luk, John Mussack, Dorrit Ahbel, Nancy Freehafcr; Second Row: Tom Rundal, R. B. Woolsey, Russ Nelson, Maurice Lam, Dwayne Naff, Mike van de Vanter, Shirley Luehring, Chris Carter, Terry Hall, Mark Capri, Gaston Chan. Larry Marshal, Wing Leugn, Steve Smith, Paul Atkinson, Jeff Blanchard. John Jago; Third Row: Mark Loye, Richard Keating, Dave Thomas. Vince One ■ 464 COM MUfi, Beta Chi Community For The Performing Arts Beta Chi has gone through a lot of changes since it was founded in 1891 as a chapter of the Sigma Nu National Fraternity. In 1962 it broke its ties with the national and became a local fraternity. This fall it became a coeducational community with programs designed to establish a tradition focusing upon the perofrming arts: drama, music, dance, film-making, etc. With this in mind, the members of the Community began to remodel the Beta Chi House's sleeping porch to make it into a theater. This work was halted by fire marshals and building inspectors. As a result Beta Chi staged its first production in a large carnival tent in the back yard. This was a production of Beclch by Rochelle Owens. Beclch was directed by Bob Walter, Beta Chi's Resident Assistant, and involved virtually all members of the community in some aspect of its production. Other activities at Beta Chi this year have included a dance workshop, a seminar on ritual, a Monday night series of speakers on topcis related to the arts, a film series, the traditional Beta Chi Faculty Cocktail Party, and a number of house dances. On Moratorium Day, October 15, the Community as a group campaigned against the War in Viet-Nam at the San Francisco Airport. 465 First row: Lassie, Mahatma Gandhi, Timothy Leary, Richard Nixon, Janis Joplin, Nelson Rockefeller, Rosa Luxembourg, Ike Newton, Dale Evans, Julie Eisenhower; Second row: Melvin Laird, Sappho, Johnny Appfcsecd, Jimmy Olsen, Alan Watts. Vanzetti; Third row: K..rl Marx, Baruch Spinoza, Eliot Ness, 8rian Wilson, Al Capone, Saint Augustine, John Donne, Agatha Christie, Jimmy Hoffa, Jack Robespierre Louis Lopez Linda Chew Larry Owusu Laurel Matsukado Off-Campus Students 466 Al Dubuc Neil Arnet Nick Pappas Robert Smiley John Coghlan, Claudia Wyss, Audrey-Charlotte Jaques, Wesley Jarrell, Maureen Phillips, James Babbitt, Jim Weaver, Cheryl Arnold, Anne Blumtcin, Milly Brown 467 Patrons The 1970 Stanford Quad wishes to thank the following people for their patronage: Mr. and Mrs. D. D. Cram Mr. and Mrs. Alfred Escoffier Dr. and Mrs. Y. F. Fujikawa Mr. and Mrs. John H. Fyfe T. Hirabayashi Mr. and Mrs. Flarold D. North, Jr. Dr. and Mrs. James E. O'Hare Milton 0. Pyle, Sr. Robert H. Quillinan, M.D. Mr. and Mrs. Morton D. Weiner Faculty and Administration Index Bach, George 121 Barson, John 117 8randin, Alf 99 Brooks, E. Howard 95 8ulketey, Peter 96 Clcbsch, William 104 Cuthbertson, Kenneth 92 deLeeuw, Karl 109 Drake, St. Clair 112 Flores, John 111 Glazcr, Robert 98 Goheen, John 109 Glover, Frederic 91 Greenberg, Edward 107 Guerard, Albert 106 Hargadon, Fred 100 Hofstadter, Robert 106 Kahn, Matthew 103 Kennedy, David 114 Lyman, Richard 97 Mendelowitz, Daniel 116 Napier, 8. Davie 98 Nelson, Lyle 92 Nogales, Luis 95 Otis, Brooks 108 Paff, Joseph 114 Panofsky, Wolfgang 113 Pauling, Linus 122 Pitzer, Kenneth 88, 89 Potter, David 112 Rcmson, Irwin 119 Rivers, William 105 Simmons, James 94 Smith, Jeffery 115 Sokolove, Patricia 116 Thompson, David 110 Toolcy, Michael 102 Walker, Robert 97 Wessells, Norman 118 Wyman, Willard 93 Zimbardo, Philip 120 468 General Index Academics Opinion 76 Activities Opinion 152 Adelfa 373 Administration 87 Affiliations 409 AIIE 199 Alondra 364 Alpha Delta Phi 411 Alpha Phi Omega 181 Alpha Sigma Phi 412 Alpha Tau Omicron 414 Alumni Association 193 ARENA 207 Army ROTC 216 Arroyo 391 ASSU 162 ASSU Travel Service 168 AUSA 218 Axe Commission 197 Band 174 Baseball 286 Basketball 262 Beta Chi Community 464 Beta Theta Pi 416 Black Students Union 212 Board of Trustees 90 Branner 360 Burbank 380 Cardenal 365 Cardinals Board 169 Cedro 362 ChiPsi 418 Choir 205 Christian Science 224 Conservation Group 214 Crew 300 Crosscountry 260 DAILY 182 Day Care Center 170 Debate Union 188 Delta Chi 420 Delta Kappa Epsilon 422 Delta Tau Delta 424 Delta Upsilon 426 Durand 398 Eating Clubs 454 El Campo 455 El Capitan 458 El Cuadro 456 El Tigre 459 El Toro 460 Eucalypto 374 Faculty 101 Faisan 366 Fall Sports 235 Fencing Club 203 Firehouse 221 Football 236 Gavilan 368 Golf 304 Granada 375 Grove 399 Guthrie 400 Gymnastics 282 Hamburg Program 146 Hopkins Marine Station 148 International Association 219 Intramurals 309 Jordan 402 Kappa Alpha 428 Kappa Sigma 430 Keio Committee 218 KZSU 190 Lacrosse 302 Lambda Nu 432 Larkin 382 Lathrop 403 Lifeguards 162 Loro 369 LosArcos 462 Madera 394 Magnolia 376 Manzanita Park 407 Mayfield 405 MECHA 194 Mendicants 179 Men's Glee Club 178 Mexicali Project 202 Mirlo 370 Muir 388 Naranja 378 News and Opinion 33 Nursing Students 180 Off-Campus Students 466 Olivo 379 Orchestra 204 Otero 395 Overseas Campuses 134 Overseas Campuses Board 192 Paloma 372 Phi Delta Theta 434 Phi Gamma Delta 436 Phi Kappa Psi 437 Phi Kappa Sigma 438 Phi Sigma Kappa 440 Political Union 196 Publications Board 187 QUAD 208 Ram's Head 172 Recruitment Opinion 228 Research Projects 123 Residences 359 Rifle Club 203 Rifle Team 308 Rinconada 396 Roth 404 Rugby 280 Sailing 306 Salamanca 147 Senate 164 Senior Officers 334 Seniors 333 Serra 384 Ski Club 220 Sigma Alpha Epsilon 442 Sigma Chi Omega 444 Sigma Phi Sigma 198 Soccer 258 Special Events Board 169 Spring Sports 285 Stanford in Austria 136 Stanford in Britain 138 Stanford in France 140 Stanford in Germany 142 Stanford in Italy 144 Stanford in Washington 201 SMIP 187 Storey 406 Student Guides 198 Swimming 272 SWOPSI 223 Tau Beta Pi 199 Tennis 298 Theta Chi 446 Theta Delta Chi 448 Theta Xi 450 Track 292 Trancos 397 Tresidder Union Board 200 Tours Program 146 Twain 386 Undergraduate Opinion 320 Volleyball 307 Water Polo 256 Winter Sports 261 Women's Recreation Assoc. 313 Wrestling 278 Yell Leaders 176 Young Republicans 191 Zeta Psi 452 469 Student Index A Abrahams, Steven 336 Abrams, Steven 414 Absher, James 138, 336 Achor. Susan 366. 367 Achterman, Gail 198, 378 Ackerman, Walter 413 Adams, Christie 402 Adams, Douglas 239, 297, 425 Adams, Gregory 336. 452 Adams, Lynda 393 Adams. William 336 Aggarwal, Bina 336, 374 Agnew. William 382 Agncw. William 452 Aguirre, Mickey 362 Ahbel, Dorrit 463 Ahearne, Jane 399 Ahern. Michael 305, 397 Ahmann, Carol 395 Ahmann, Rebecca 362 Aiken. Michael 336, 384 Alaniz. Mario 372 Albarracin. Pedro 336 Albrandt. Jim 416 Alcorn. John 336 Alden. David 336 Alden, John 438 Alden, Merritt 361 Aleshire. David 224 Alexander, Patricia 336 Alexander. William 239, 416. 417 Allbrondt, James 336 Allen, James 336 Allen, Jeffrey 336. 428 Allen, Patricia 181 Allen, Robert 166 Allen. Sarah 388 Allen, Thomas 399 Allender, Mary 138. 336 Allen, Deborah 363 Allyn, Jeffery 423 Allyn, Marc 369 Almas, James 451 Almas, Jane 372 Alston, Charles 433 Alterman, Benjamin 144 Altorfer, Linda 336 Alustiza. John 239. 425 Alvarado, Donald 239, 425 Amend, Allison 336, 379 Amstutz, Gary 396 Amundsen, Adrienne 393 Anagick. Ella 364 Andersen. David 303 Anderson. Carl 192, 444 Anderson, Christy 403 Anderson. Dave 239, 381 Anderson. David 8. 336 Anderson, David L. 438 Anderson, Douglas 175, 454 Anderson, Edgar 191. 376 Anderson. Jeffrey 175, 388, 390 Anderson, Jennifer 144 Anderson, John 297, 365 Anderson, Mark 179, 391 Anderson, Richard 448 Anderson, Roberta 384 Anderson, Terry 461 Anderson, Thomas 297 Anderson, William 144 Andrews, Bryan 382 Andrews. Catherine 366 Andrews, John 430 Andrews, Robert 178, 179 Andrews, Thomas 396 Annand, lathan 336 Anspach, Gary 418, 419 Antonchick, Barbara 336 Antognini, James 385 Antrell. David 336,411 Antrobus, Kevin 362 Appleby. Robert 336 Appleton, Lee 373 Apt, Lorrie 387 Araki, Warren 389 Aranota, Louis 369 Arima, Thomas 336, 446 Armstrong, James 336, 448 Armstrong, Michael 192, 336, 442 Armstrong, Richard 457 Arnet, Neil 336. 466 Arnold, Cheryl 467 Arnold, Forrest 397 Arnold, Jennifer 370 Arth, Christopher 419 Arthur. John 182. 336 Ashcraft. Michael 177 Ashcraft. Howard 396 Ashley, Stephen 182 Ashton, Michael 172.448 Askinas, Barry 163 Atherton. Geary 423 Atherton, Steve 428, 429 Atkins. William 299 Atkinson, Mark 452 Atkinson, Richard 463 Atkinson, Paul 454 Atwood, Lang 138, 182 Austin, Melissa 361 Austin, Michael 336 Avery, Christopher 365 Ayer, Donald 191,442 Ayres. Robert 396 B Baatz, Janet 393 Baba. Georgia 378 Babbitt. James 336, 467 Babcock, James 441 Babcock, Michael Bach, Stephen 297 Bachelder, Stephen 362, 384 Bacholor, Eric 197 Bachman, Ellen 379 Bacon. Charles 336 Bacon, William 336, 419 Bacon. Terry 458 Baer, James 185 Baer, Harold 336, 455 Bagdasarian, Gary 448 Bagwell, Steven 336 Bailey. Jo 138.403 Bailey. Susan 335.336 Baird. Bruce 336, 399 Baird. Brynn 336 Baker, David 369 Baker, Jane 459 Baker. Jeffrey 337.412 Baker, Katherine 403 Baker, Neil 369 Bakkcnsen, Ralph 297. 374 Bakun, Stanley 429 Balcar, Irene 368 Baich. Pamela 337 Baldasari, Nicholas 462 Baldo, Angela 337. 462 Baldwin, Andrew 397 Baldwin, Blake 271 Baldwin, Michael 451 Balfour. Morris 382 Balgrosky, Steven 175, 438 Ball. Esther 337, 374 Ball. Heather 142 Ballard, Thomas 175 Bancroft, John 386 Banks. Fred 442 Banks, Greg 337, 426 Bannerman, Ronald 259, 422 Barber, David 198, 442 Barber, James 362 Barber, William 271 Barceloux, Donald 426 Barcus, Charles 423 Barger, Mary 370 Barker, Larry 175, 365 Barker. Meredith 337 Barlow. Steven 444 Barnard. Dennis 430 Barnes, Diane 144 Barnes. Jeff 175 Barnes, Randall 369 Barnett, Linda 142 Barnett, Patricia 388 Barnhill, David 448 Barringer, Felicity 182 Barry, Jon 411 Barry, Nancy 142 Bartholet, Michael 365 Bartle, Jim 459 Basri, Gibor 175, 395 Batchelder, Timothy 397 Bates. Ceciley 337, 432 Bates, Joseph 396 Battle. Anita 335. 337 Bauer. Charles 271,411 Bough, Bradford 185 Bauhofer, Donald 396 Baum, Lawrence 365 8auman, Jeffrey 337, 461 Baumgartner, Frank 425 Baxter, Raymond 142 8aycroft. Barney 418 Beahrs, William 138 Beam, Loudin 187 Bean, Melanie 374 Beasley, Sam 337 Beatty. Ann 401 Beatty, Dave 138 8cck, Bruce 337 Beck. Dennis 187, 337, 430 Beck. Hans 191. 395 Beck. Mark 144.439 Becker, Michael 458 Becks, Harold 337 Beers. John 305, 397 Behlcndorf, Candace 363 Behling, Barbara 138 8eiazak, Tim 425 Bddcn, Cathlcen 372 Belden, Robert 444 Bell. John 446 Bell, Martha 224 Bell. Patricia 373 Bell. William 391 Seller. Richard 175.362 Benda, John 459 Bender, Robert 337,451 Benefiel, Marilyn 364 Benefiel, Michael 363 Bennett, Charles 303 Bennett, Daniel 337 Benson, Victor 305 Berg, Wedell 175 Bergman, James 337, 456, 457 Bergo, Edward 446 Bergstrom, Erica 362 Bergstrom, Mark 440 Berk. Errol 369 Berke. Tricia 373 Bernhard, Craig 444 Bernier. John 387 Bernstein, Daniel 175 Bernstein, Robert 382 Berry, Donald 175, 381 Berry, Robert 239. 377 Berryhill, Susan 337, 399 Bcrti, Barbara 144 Bevier, Michael 376 Bcyler, Eric 389 Bhagwat, Bal 337 Bianchi, John 451 Biegenzahn, Stephen 197, 416 Binger, Jane 142 Binkley, Terry 144 Bird, Katherine 402, 429 Birnbaum, Wendy 388 Bishop, James 448 Bitis, David 337 Bjorklund, Karen 403 Bjornstad, Randi 337 Blacher, Mason 175 Black. Harry 436 8lack, Natalie 403 8lack, William 337 Blackwell, Samuel 138 Blake. David 300, 390 Blake. Michelle 361 Blakemore. Christopher 396 Blakcslcc. Lucia 337 Blanchard. Jeffrey 178, 463 Bland. Margaret 363 Blaney, Dave 138 Blasberg, Steven 378 Blcymaier, Thoodore 416. 417 Bliss, Fredric 411 Block. Gene 337 Block. Tori 337 Block. Victoria Blois, Elizabeth 344 Blois, Erik 364 Blois. Scott 364 Bluemle, Melissa 337 Blumlcin, Ann 467 Blurton, Cheryl 366 Bobel, Philip 138 Bodin, John 259. 381 Bocckcrman, Paul 175, 441 Boelter, William 337,442 Bohler, John 138 Bold, Jane 361 Bomke, Julie 403 Bond. Jennifer 197, 335, 337, 403 Bond. Robert 442 Bone, Robert 398 8onneville. Laura 378 Bonzon. Jeffrey 185, 338, 429 Bookin, David 338, 432 Boone, Carol 400 Boone. Rodney 361 Boot, Samuel 175,303 Booth, Charlotte 338 Booth. Susan 462 Boothe, Thomas 397 Boozer, Young 439 Borgh, Karin 398 Borjon, Rosemarie 371 Borns, Frederick 423 Borowicz. Thomas 144 Boreing, Mike 437 Borstelmann, Nancy 395 Boryla. Michael 239,271 Bosler. Melissa 338, 403 Bostic. Joseph 365 471 Bottomly, Jim 416, 417 Boughton, Robert 239, 365 8ouis, Howarth 439 Boute, Raymond 374 Boutin, Peter 197, 413 Bower, James 338, 422, 423 Bower, John 457 Bower, Thomas 443 Bowers, Daniel 178, 391 Bowers, Joe 369 Bowers, Richard 459 Bowers, Steven 338, 416 Bowhay, Thomas 175 Boyar, Constance 181 Boyce, Mary 375 Boyd, Stuart 338. 429 Boyle, Michael 386 Bracewell. J. 456, 457 Bradley, Catherine 368 Bradley, Majewery 338 Brandt, Gregory 338 Brant, Christian 197 Brecht, Pauline 379 Breeden, Richard 430 Brccr, Carla 338, 403 Bregenzahn, Steve 417 Brennan, Catherine 338 Brennan, Patrick 142 Brenner, David 382 Brett, Bcttsy 379 Bresver, Marion 144 Bridges, Richard 338, 423 Brinkerhoff, George 426 Briskin, Jonathan 192,457 Broberg, Richard 365 Brock, Gregory 263, 297 Brock. Clyde 305,416,417 Brock,John 305, 417 Brody. Robert 338 Broholm, John 391 8roms, Anton 425 Brookes, Daisy 338 Brooks, Deborah 373 Brooks, Stephen 239, 378 8rosterhous, Philip 413 Brower, Danny 386 Brown, Bubba 239 Brown, Carol 224 Brown, Cornelia 399 Brown, Howard 338 Brown, Jackie 239 Brown, Kirk 426 Brown, Mark 142. 239,4 Brown, Mildred 467 Brown. Ralph 369 Brown, Robert 239, 338 Brown, Rodney 220, 239 Brown, Teri 428 Brown, Sylvia 364 Browsard, Al 362 Broyles, Melinda 142 Bruce, Greg 138 Brunsman, John 413 Brutinel, William 338, 389 Bruton, Charles 451 Bryan. Mary 366. 367 Bube, Kenneth 378 Buck, Thomas 433 Buell, Robert 271 Buenrostro. Olivia 372 Buffalow, Victor 138 Bunce, Donald 239 Burch, John 338 Burd, Moyses 457 Burgort, Mark 175 Burgess, Mary 372 Burke, Christopher 396 Burke, James 416, 417 Burke, Robert 429 Burke, Stephen 439 8urkc, Susan 181 8urkc, Wallace 362 Burkett, Kathryn 142 Burman, Lynda 179 Burmoister, Robert 239 Burnett, Kathleen 338 Burns, Betsy 144 8urns, Dale 338 8urns, Robert 305 Burton, Dave 138 Burton, Jeffrey 144, 439 8urton, Steven 338 Busby, Leonard 459 8user, James 297, 382 Bush, John 365 Bush, Robert 416,417 Butler, Joel 144 Butler, Lawrence 239, 429 Buttrey, Paul 338 Butts, Virginia 144 8uxton, Richard 338 Buyers, Robert 175 Byrne, Elizabeth 338 Byrom, John 338 c Caballero, Cathleen 175, 177 Cady, Teresa 403 Calkins, Gregory 381 Callaghan. Kevin 338.413 Callahan, Connie 197, 378 Calvo-Ponton, Armando 423 Cameron, Kit 172 Camm, Arlene 393 Campbell, Bruce 387 Campbell, Dean 175 Campbell, Kathleen 197, 370 Campbell, Mary 362 Campbell, Ross 339, 429 Campbell. Wayne 382 Candclario, Eric 399 Cane, Christine 405 Canids, Jack 422 Canter, Shelley 339 Cantu, Hilda 371 Cappelloni, Robert 444 Capps, John 411 Capri, Mark 463 Cardinalli, Carl 339 Carelli, Bert 175, 399 Carlson, Carl 459 Carnevale, Steven 440 Carpenter, James 432 Carpenter, Ken 416 Carrasco, Frank 339 Carrera, Carlos 175, 339 Carrigan, Casey 297, 362 Carrigan. Michael 239, 297. 339. 425 Carroll, Francis 339 Carroll, Livingston 339 Carruth, John 411 Carlson. Carl 175 Carson. Kristin 339 Carson, Lesley 392 Carstarphen. Gale 339, 363 Carstensen, Hans 187, 339. 426 Carter, Christine 463 Carter, Diana 339, 403 Carter. Mary 339. 374 Carter, Ruth 373 Carter, Sterling 339, 373 Cary. Peter 339. 451 Casey. Samuel 259 Castellanos, Manuel 365 Castillo. Ricardo 339 Caswell, Richard 413 Cates, Julia 363 Cothorwood, Bayard 339, 455 Catlin, Jo 363 Caton, Cathleen 339, 378 Caublc, Gary 395 Cavanaugh, Carol 368 Cedar, Don 142 Cedarbaum. Jesse 182 Cerda. Jose 387 Challen, Susan 339 Chamberlin, Dick 442 Chambers, David 448 Chambers, Ned 396 Chambers, Penelope 339, 403 Chan, Gaston 463 Chan. Nelson 374 Chang, Lois 339, 385, 404 Chang. Wesley 339. 384 Chapin, Bruce 382 Chapin. Christopher 299 Chapin, Linda 144 Chapman, Geoffrey 142 Chappell, Gerald 365 Charles. Cheric 339. 404 Charlton, Carolyn 197, 371 Charlton. Frank 197, 396 Chase, Deborah 339 Chee, Jimmy 339 Cheng, Dewitt 461 Cheronis, John 378 Chew, Stephanie 374 Chiarulli, Linda 467 Child, Steven 339 Childs. Jon 175. 303 Childs, Stuart 303 Chin, Daniel 378 Ching, Eric 390 Ching, Gerald 199 Chiu. Yue 461 Choate, Frederick 303. 363 Chooljian, Cheryl 388 Christensen, Alan 444 Christensen, Dana 369 Christensen, Leonard 443 Christensen, Paul 8. 339 Christensen, Paul J. 339 Christensen. Peter 138 Christenson, Doranna 392 Christofani, Don 384 Chu, Harold 339 Chumrau. Gary 391 Ciavarella. David 363 Cisneros, Manuel 423 Claflin. Mac 142. 299 Clair, Pierson 138. 339 Cjatkowski, Lee 381 Clapp, Virginia 385 Clapp, Stephen 339, 429 Clappison, Valerie 371 Clark. Carolyn 224 Clark. Gary 418. 419 Clark, James 456 Clark. Kathryn 181.458 Clark. Kathryn J. 181.458 Clark. West 396 Clarke, Frances 144 Clarke, Frederick 446 Claussen, Woodrow 452 Cleary, Michael 339, 455 Clearman, David 412 Clcbsch, Sarah 387 Clemens. Kristine 364 Clement. Daniel 303, 339 Clemo, Julie 339 Clewctt. John 430 Clifton. Mike 459 Clock, Phil 451 Clock, Tim 451 Cloud, Steven 198, 340 Coatc, James 138 Cobey, Christopher 201 Cochran, Robert 224 Coe, Martha 340 Coe. Robert 263, 297, 416. 417 Cofer, Lawrence 175 Coffee, Stephen 418, 423 Coffey, Anne 372 Coghlan. John 467 Cohen, Bruce 144 Cohen, Claudia 459 Cohen, Diana 340 Cohrt, Theodore 452 Colby, Robert 340 Cole, Daniel 175 Cole. Deborah 362 Coleman, David 378 Collier. Contance 179 Collings, James 425 Collins, Carole 404 Collins, James 429 Collins, Mark 426 Collom, Martin 340 Colombatto, Stephen 397 Colten, Margery 395 Colvin, Kenneth 305, 395 Colwell, Susan 386 Combs, Charles 448 Comey, Dawna 181.401 Compton, 8ruce 138 Conant, Pamela 401 Condry, Charles 340. 457 Connell, Peter 142 Connelly, Anne 403 Connolly, Donald 300, 340 Connor, Michael 362 Conrad, Robert 384 Considinc, William 198,455 Conway, Lawrence 175, 422, 423 Cook, Daniel 190 Cook, Frances 181 Cook, Gary 259 Cook, Kem 142 Cooke, Christopher 144 Cooke, William 459 Cookson, Robert 170, 340, 425 Coolidge, Charles 429 Coope. George 397 Cooper. Cathleen 182. 340 Cooper, Donnau 387 Cooper, Michael 458 Cooper, Shcril 366 Cooper, William 395 Cooperman, Joshua 201, 385 Coors, Grover 303 Corbett, Kitty 363 Corbyn, George 340. 426 Corcoran, Christine 361 Corday. Stephen 176, 439 Cordial, Timothy 239 Corenman, Cynthia 403 Coronata, John 387 Correia, Edmund 178 Corrigan, Jane 182 Cory, Robert 179 Coughlin, Thomas 396 Counihan, Carole 340 Cousins, Mary 181 Covey, Susan 399 Cowan, Roger 239 473 Cox, Barbara 144 Cox, Carolyn 142 Cox, Marianne 371 Cox. Ryan 419 Cox, William 224 Coyne, Barry 382 Cozzens, Christine 459 Craig, Ann 170 Craig, Catherine 372 Cram, Laurence 305, 340, 448 Cramblit, Butto 452 Crandall, George 397 Crane, Robert 452 Crawford, Glen 376, 377 Crawford, Lawrence 303, 397 Crawford, Sarah 366, 367 Creighton, Karyn 224, 379 Creighton, Robin 374 Cretan, Lawrence 459 Cribari, Sue 404 Crispin. Kent 462 Cristaldo, Al 462 Cronenberg, Steven 340. 429 Cronin, Kevin 452 Cronkite, Ruth 340 Crooks, George 239 Crooks, Theodore 187, 430 Crosby. Peter 239,416 Cross, Eric 239 Cross, James 239. 340, 399 Cross, Raymond 340 Crouch, James 419 Crouse, Vonda 198 Crowe, Frederick 418 Croyle, Philip 446 Cruse, Barbara 170 Cruter. Karen 340 Cruz, Frederick 448 Cubbison, Gene 340 Culling. Keith 365 Culver, Hallie 340, 400 Cumming, Donald 429 Cummings, Keith 436 Cunningham, James 457 Cunningham, James 387 Curry. Barr 239. 391 Curry. Philip 386 Curtiss, Alan 197, 365 Curtiss. William 362 Cutrona, Carolyn 399 Cutting, Douglas 340 Cuykendall, Clydia 220 Cyrus, Muriel 361 Czarkowski, Elizabeth 340, 367 D Dahl, Barbara 393 Daily, Hall 382 Daley. John 175. 340 Damassa, David 175, 459 Danaher, Eugene 340 Danilovich, John 144 Dankers, Hans 438 Darm, Jerry 444 Darrow, Laurence 175 Daseking. Henry 446 Daugherty, Robert 299, 448 Daum, Glen 175 Davey, Keith 397 Davidson, Clifton 340 Davidson, Diane 340 Davidson. Gordon 340, 448 Davidson, Karen 144 Oavis, Arlene 368 Davis, Barbara 144 Davis, Carolyn 370 Davis, James 340 Davis, Karen 340. 387 Davis. Michael 416,417 Davis, Robert 461 Davis, Roger 455 Davis, Stephen 297 Dawson. Michael 385 Day, Frank 458 Deal, Rocklun 142 Debakcsy, Alan 454, 461 Debique, Leslie 392 Dobs, Robert 340 Decker, Bruce 426 Dedmon, Jonathan 182, 429 Dchncrt, James 395 Delker, Diana 375 Delotell. Serena 340 Delurgio, Nicholas 340 Doming, Hunt 259 Deming, Jeffrey 396 Demond, Gorton 169 Dempsey, Ray 365 Denault, Kenneth 178 Denningcr, George 224 Denniston, Philip 340, 436 Denton, David 436 Depp. James 142 Deprez, Gregory 387 Derby, Virginia 181 Derringer, Jim 438 De Sieycs. Chuck 144 Desmond, Laura 340 Dcstouot, Maurice 340 De-Uriarte, Roberto 374 Dcvlicg, Patricia 389, 429 Dewell, Louise 371 Dewitt, Charles 431 Dews, Robert 297 Diamond, Larry 182 Diaz, Rafael 374 Dick, Anne 432 Dickerson. Jane 340 Dickerson, Paul 175 Dickinson, Richard 391 Dickson, Craig 341,455 Dictor, Cary 144, 341, 439 Dierking, John 341 Dilley. Rebecca 362 Dillon. Robert 341,446 Diturgio. Nick 444 Ditchey, Roy 341 Ditz, Lorraine 341 Divittorio, Daniel 144 Docheff, Daniel 448 Docker, Rick 426 Doe, Charles 425 Doepel, Debra 144 Dohner, John 175 Dold, Steven 341.439 Dominick, Oliver 303. 391 Donaldson, Kay 363 Donart, James 297, 341, 413 Donesley, Brian 341,412 Dong, Nelson 384 Donnelly, Dawn 366 Donovan, Shaun 381 Doordan, Dennis 382 Dorsey, Deborah 368 Dougherty, Stephen 297 Douglas. Lawrence 376 Douglas, Robert 396 Dow, Bob 430 Dowell, James 426 Downey, Robert 423 Downs, James 391 Drake, Joan 341 Drcissigacker, Peter 297 Drennan, Michael 378 Drexler, Paul 398 Drickamer. Lowell 361 Drum, David 397 Dryden. Lanny 398 Dubuc, Alfred 466 Ducommun, Robert 382 Dudley, William 444 Dudrey, John 300, 341.376 Duff, Margaret 374 Duffy. Peter 142, 341 Duncan, Stephen 422, 423 Duncheon, Michael 341 Dunham, Robert 461 Dunn, Carolyn 429 Dunn, Laura 341 Dunning, Steven 444 Durbin, Anna 370 Duree, James 459 Durham. William 175, 300 Duscnbcry, Verne 384 Duvall, Ronald 389 Dwulet, Leon 305 Dyer, Carolyn 373 Dyer, Charles 263, 297 Dyer, Lauren 399 Dykhuis, Geert 458 Dyson, Albert 239, 297 E Eagleston, Richard 411 Eakin, James 341,418, 419 Eakin, Tim 374 Eakland, William 303. 341, 438. 439 Earle, Ralph 459 Easterbrook, Catherine 341 Easterbrook, James 341,429 Ebro, Rita 374 Eckhousc. John 182, 341, 448 Eddy, Douglas 341, 411 Eddy. James 305. 365 Edmunds, Gillette 384 Edmunds, Wesley 429 Edson, David 422. 423 Edwards, Burton 144 Edwards. David 341 Egan, Jay 341 Egge, Alan 458 Eggebrotcn, Anne 388 Egolf, Brian 426 Ehrenreich, Edward 431 Ehrlichman, Peter 431 Eick, Barbara 142 Elam, Jeanann 138 Elbel. Donald 439 Eiger. John 439 Eller. Joseph 224 Ellingscn, Deborah 368 Elliott, Daniel 439 Elliott. Kathloen 181,368 Ellsworth, William 342 Elving, Ronald 439 Emerson. David 178, 462 Engel, Greg 342, 443 Engler. Renata 404 Ensmingcr, Charles 334, 335. 342 Epling, Michael 387 Epstein, Marilyn 384 Erickson, Gayle 142 Erickson, Pam 379 Ernst, Don 144 Ertl, Rett 297 Eskola, Christine 175, 177, 364, 443 Espinoza, Raymond 239 Essig, Karl 369 Etherington, Scott 175, 398 Eu. Henry 342. 395 Eustis. Jeffrey 190 Evans. Donald 300, 381 Evans, Richard 299 Evans, Sylvia 342 Evans, Tim 452 Everdcll. Peter 363 Evers, Robert 428 Ewing, Anita 366 Ewing. Michael 239, 342. 444 F Facer. Heidi 169. 342 Fagan, Carol 142, 342 Fahr, Edith 366 Fair, Lee 239, 444 Fairbairn, Douglas 342, 411 Fairchild, Peter 297 Fallendcr, Steve 138 Faller, Virginia 384 Fallon, Michele 144 Fant, Curtis 414 Farber, Nancy 342 Farecd, Marcee 342 Farley, Robert 387 Farrell. Katherine 342 Farrell, Patricia 363 Farrell, Wesley 178 Farwell, Grosvenor 342 Faught. William 381 Fay, Charles 175 Fay. Paul 414 Feeney. Barbara 372 Feeney, Dennis 443 Fehring, Julie 459 Feichtinger, Stephen 399 Feldman. Philip 175 Fellows, John 422 Fenner, Barbara Fenner, Thomas 396 Fenske. Dick 342 Ferguson. James 342 Ferguson, James 432 Ferber, Mark 396 Ferrari, Terry 342 Ferrer, Alfred 342.416.417 Ferris, Noel 342 Ferry, John 387 Feurst, Sidney 381 Fiddes, Joan 185 Field, Raul 198, 395 Fields, Deborah 385 Fields. Diane 175, 177 Fierro, Louis 343 Figone. Patricia 343 Finger, Paula 343, 373 Fink, Richard 343 Fink, Robert I. 334, 335, 343 Fink, Robert J. 439 Firestein, Dave 396 Fischer, Jeff 170 Fisher, Carolyn 181,462 Fisher, Demctrics 365 Fisher. Jeffrey 182, 343 Fisher, Richard 299 Fisichella. Dominick 343 Fishman, Ronit 361 Fitz, James 442 Fitsmaurice, Carolyn 175, 343 Fitzsimmons, Stacey 387 Flagg, Deborah 190 Flanagan. Sarah 393 Flandro, Gerald 369 Flannery, Steven 297, 343 474 Fleece. Julie 182, 373. 428. 442 Fleeman, William 418 Flegal. Christopher 175 Fletcher, Christopher 444 Fletcher, Michael 363 Fliesler, Michael 391 Flohr, Charles 397 Flood, Connie 181 Flores. Anthony 376 Floyd, Craig 462 Foerster, Julie 343, 390 Folsom. Thomas 446 Fong. Cheryl 368 Fong, George 387 Fong. Paul 365 Fong, Shelborne 382 Foote, John 411 Foote, Kathleen 387 Ford. Gregory 297, 343 Ford. Glenn 430 Ford. John 439 Foreman, Ken 382 Forman, Lee 138 Forester, Julie 371 Forster, Michael 416, 417 Forthoffer, James 142 Fortmann, Stephen 343 Fortune, Larry 343, 423 Foster, Bruce 396 Foster, Jesse 391 Foster. Laura 197, 370 Fotre, Terry 190 Foucault, Mary 138, 343 Foulkes, Juliet 142 Foulkes, Imogene 142 Fowler. Marcia 343 Fox, Frederick 430 Fox, Marybcth 457 Francis, Charles 297 Frank, Andrew 365 Frank, Forrest 142, 343 Frank, Michael 144 Franklin, John 395 Frantz. Julie 142 Frantz, Robert 442 Frantzreb, Richard 224 Franzini, Marilyn 197. 371 Franzini, Robert 175 Fraser, Christie 375, 405 Fraser, Michael 138, 386 Frawley, Joseph 428 Frederick, James 399 Frecar, Osceola 197 Freedman, Johanna 185 Freehafer, Nancy 463 Freeman, Charles 343 Freeman, David 411 Freiman. Mark 385 Freivogel, William 448 Frey, Philip 395 Friberg, Thomas 462 Fricker, Jennifer 367 Friesen. Cynthia 181,366 Friese, Kim 426 Froom, Paul 178 Fry. Brian 142 Fry, Cynthia 343 Fry. Robin 299. 437 Fry. Patti 181 Fryberger, Mary 366 Fryburg, Mark 396 Fuetsch, Frederic 343 Fujikawa. Ronald 239, 343, 425 Fukushima, Glen 458 Fulkerson, Charles 343 Fulton. Angus 142 Funamura, Jack 175, 442 Funkhouser, Thomas 436 Furmanski, Martin 343 Furniss. Daniel 239, 396 Furnas, Paul Furst, Timothy 399 Fyfc, Betsy 343 G Gaines, David 413 Galich, Danica 378 Gallagher, John 377 Gamble, David 425 Gamble. Lawrence 144 Gambrel I. Richard 363 Ganaviwal. Rick 462 Gant. Vernon 239 Gantz, George 459 Garcia. David 382 Garcia. Marilyn 364 Garland. Gary 343. 419 Garlin, Kim 400 Gar ms. Margaret 459 Garrett, Elizabeth 197, 364 Garrett, Jeffery 428 Gartner. Alan 458 Garvin, Joan 458 Gar win, Jeffrey 381 Garza. David 343 Caspar, Stephen 388 Gaspich. Eileen 181.405 Gass, Gerald 442 Gasteazoro, Raul 144 Gates, Robert 440 Gault, Beverly 456, 457 Gaynor, Randall 239, 369 Gee, Buck 175,386 Gee, Glenn 343 Gelbard, Martin 437 George. Ron 418 Gerity, Kate 399 Gerken, Daniel 388 Gherini, Susan 372 Ghormley, Scott 452 Ghormley, William 411 Giallonardo. Thomas 425 Gianos, Philip 448 Gibson, Linda 462 Gibson, Martha 386. 455 Gibson, Robert 343, 452 Gibson, Thomas 462 Gibson, William 451 Gifford, Carolyn 375 Gilbert, Deborah 373 Gilbertson, Catherine 399 Gilchrist. Elizabeth 343, 403 Gill, Steven 389 Gillespie. Alan 440 Gillespie, Jim 142,439 Gilmer, David 455 Ginsberg, Emily 403 Gioia, Michael 363 Giokaris, George 239 Girard, Tyley 144 Giske, Jan 142 Gittler, Gregg 414 Given, Thomas 182 Glaser. John 444 Glenn, Lawrence 303 Gluek, Margaret 343 Godderz. Richard 239 Goldberg, Larry 300 Goldberg, Marshall 452 Golden, Cornelius 343. 399 Goldenbcrg, Edie 375 Goldhammer, Ron 443 Golub. Joseph 439 Gondak, Christine 144 Gong, Raymond 343 Gonser, Carl 439 Gonzalez. Irma 335, 343 Gonzalez, Carol 429 Good, Virginia 343 Goodan, Amanda 197, 371, 416 Goodman, Corey 459 Goodman, Linda 343 Goodman, Larry 303, 414 Goodman. Norman 457 Goodwin, Robert 384 Goralnik, Jack 345. 438 Gordon, Malcolm 391 Gordon. Victor 365 Gorschoff, Dave 462 Gorham. William 178 Goss, Steven 396 Gotham, Sandra 335, 344 Gough, 8rian 144 Gould, Andrew 390 Gould, Randall 344 Gould, Terrence 462 Grabstem, Richard 175 Graf. Werner 458 Graham. David 388 Grainger, Robert 395 Grartader, Lawrence 386 Granger, John 138 Granger. Lawrence 365 Granoff. Tatiana 368 Grant, John 441 Graves. Margaret 181.344 Gray, 8arbara 344, 373 Gray. James 446 Gray, Jon 224 Gray, Larry 344 Green. Ann 371 Green, Daniel 398 Green. Elizabeth 367 Green, Ellen 372 Green. Frederick 271 Green, Marshall 398 Green. Warner 430 Greenberg. Gary 142 Greenlaw, David 297 Gregg. Peter 416, 417, 419 Gregory, Deeling 344 Grether, John 382 Grey, Douglas 444 Grey, Richard 444 Griffieth. Gary 177 Griffith, William 297. 344 Griffiths, Ann 344 Grillo. Alexander 431 Grisham, Nancy 344 Groslimond. Gery 299 Grossi, Brian 411 Grossman, Andrew 178 Grossi. David 239 Grossman, Henry 444 Grossman. Jerrold 344, 386 Grover. George 414 Grover, Greg 175 Grubb, Jean 368 Grube, John 163. 344 Grushkin. Paul 182, 369 Gugelmann, George 185. 412 Guntermann, Penelope 364. 443 Gurnee. Thomas 305, 439 Guzzetta, Joseph 144 H Haas. Steven 344. 443 Hack. Darrell 198 Hackett, Sheila 138 von Hafften, Carolyn 362 Hagata, Stephen 239 Hagenmaier, Carl 387 Hagge, Woody 259 Haight. Mark 297 Hails. Alan 446 Haimson. Maud 395 Haines, Tay 344 Hajek, Olga 344. 403 Haleen, Philip 451 Haley. Jim 396 Hall, Beverly 428 Hall. Brett 303 Hall, James 142 Hall. Lester 362 Hall. Lucy 197, 372 Hall. Robin 181 Hall. Terrence 463 Hall, Tom 461 Halpern, Richard 178 Hamamura, Glenn 344 Hamburger, Lawrence 431 Hamill, Allen 344, 425 Hamilton, Karen 344. 368 Hamilton, Margaret 181,344. 385 404 Hamlin, Shelley 405 Hamm, Kathleen 344 Hamman. Steven 344. 378 Hammond, Richard 374 Hampton, Cynthia 368 Hampton. Wesley 299. 365 Hanbery, Lynn 432 Hankey, John 369 Hanks. Judith 404 Hanley, John 303 Hanna. Susan 363 Hannagan, Janice 344, 375 Hansen. Steven 175 Hanson, Barbara 344. 389. 428 Hanson, Fredrick 398 Hanson. Mark 271 Hanson. Peter 239. 397 Hantzsche, Norman 138 Hara, Glenn 461 Hardin, Charles 344. 459 Harlan. David 416, 417 Harman, Pat 436 Harnnack, Grctchen 362 Harper. David 297.413 Harpster, Howard 305 Harriage. Scott 175. 391 Harriman, Connie 400 Harrington. Gale 344 Harrington, Stephen 344 Harris, Clifton 239 Harris, John 345 Harris, Ronald G. 421 Harris. Ronald M. 345. 433 Harris, Steven 345 Harrison, Antony 345 Harrison, Jane 144 Harrison, William 345 Hart, Raymond 429 Hart, Thomas 305 Hartley. Dorothy 345 Hartman, Carl 199 Hartvickson, Leon 425 Harvey, Sylvia 167 475 476 Hassc, Margie 142 Hassen, Katharine 345 Hastorf, Elizabeth 345. 432 Hatchard, Susan 371 Hattori, Vernon 369 Hau, Gary 396 Hauge, Lester 442 Haugen,Janet 181 Haugh, Jesse 382 Hauptman, Steven 365 Hause. Lynda 181. 197. 345, 373 Hawkins. Angela 395 Hawkins, Richard 398 Hawthorne, Priscilla 432 Haxo, John 412, 413 Hayes, Kathleen 345 Hays, Sarah 364 Haywood, Fred 416, 417 Hazlehurst, Thomas 426 Hazlctt. Mark 399 Hazlett, William 303, 396 Hcacock, David 433 Head, Steven 454, 461 Headapohl, Dana 142,403 Headley, Thomas 303, 397 Hcaly, Cecilia 404 Healy, Deborah 455 Hcaly, Janet 144 Healy, James 299 Hearn, Donald 177, 439 Hearne, Stephanie 374 Heesen, David 451 Hcffelfinger, Tom 426 Heffern, Edward 461 Hcffcrnan, John 425 Heffelfinger, Thomas 345 Hcilpcrn, Robert 448 Heimlich, Ralph 182, 462 Heinen, Catherine 142 Heinz, Kenneth 142, 178 Heiser, Jeffrey 305 Heitzman, Wesley 432 Hellekson, Ronald 345, 446 Heller, 8ruce 385, 388, 390 Hclliwell, Richard 345, 411 Helms, Paul 416 Hemphill, Fred 239, 369 Henao, Rafael 179 Henderson, Janice 181, 345, 375 Hendrick, Nancy 399 Hendricks, Dana 144 Hendrickson, Chris 381 Henks, Judy 198 Hennings, Barry 175, 345 Henscheid, Kent 396 Henson, Alexander 451 Hepworth, Jed 374 Herlach. Mark 398 Herman. Chef 426 Hernandez, Mary 364 Herrera, Corina 166, 442 Herrero, Mark 239, 425 Herrero, Michael 178 Hervey, Roberta 393 Hession, Patrick 175. 297 Hewitt. Brian 142,425 Hewlett, Mary 374 Hewlett. Walter 374 Heywood, Robert 179 Hicks, Dave 436 Higuchi. Judith 345 Hill. Herbert 345, 444 Hill. Lawrence 178. 179. 345 Hill. Prather 144 Hillel, Allen 448 Hills, Kenda 361 Hiltman, Carol 462 Hine, Andrea 335 Hinklcy. Carol 345 Hinton, Bruce 142 Hinzc, Deborah 393 Hirabayashi, Dean 345 Ho, Karen 345, 379 Hoard. Qali 364 Hoard, Quintin 429 Hobson, Donnis 345 Hoch, Peter 384 Hocker, Christopher 224, 382 Hodcll, Douglas 413 Hoeft, Geoffrey 462 Hoehn, Theodore 425 Hoffman, Robert 444 Hoffman, Roger 423 Hoftiezer, James 239, 425 Hogcboon, Bob 138 Hogue, Herbert 345. 385. 419 Hohf, James 362 Hollman, Erica 392 Holmes. Carolyn 181,345, 373 Holmes, Marilyn 345 Holmes, Paul 436 Holmes, Virginia 142 Holstrom, Marshall 345 Holt, Pamela 373 Holtzman, Deborah 395 Homewood, Donald 138 Honegger, Scott 197, 412 Honey, William 239 Hooker, Linda 368 Hootkins, Susan 363 Hopkins, April 224 Hopkins. Bruce 178 Horan, Kathleen 144 Horn, Charles 382 Hornbeak, Tom 198, 452 Horowitz, Steven 239 Horsley, Jamie 144 Horst, Douglas 178, 179 Horton, Sally 345 Hoshiyama, Garry 345 Hothan, Harold 441 Houfek. Nancy 372 Houghton, Alan 259. 345, 454, 462 Houghton, John 345 Howell. Kim 397 Howell, Phil 224 Howell, Robert 365 Howery, Charles 175 Hoyt, Charles 396 Hsu. Charlene 170, 345 Hubler, Jane 400 Hudson. John 436 Huencrs, Mary 345 Huennekens, Karen 169 Huffington. Michael 187, 334, 335, 345.418 Hugo, Julie-Ellcn 366 Hummer, Laurence 363 Hummer, Martha 138, 345 Humphrey, Louis 385 Humphrey, Sally 345 Humphreys, Douglas 391 Hunker, Margaret 368 Hunt, Carder 423 Hunter, Alice 346 Huntington, Claudia 361 Huntsberger, Glen 142, 178. 179 Hurston, Osborn 175 Hussey, Linda 346 Huston, John 391 Huyette, David 381 Hyatt. Joel 175, 390 Hyde, Mark 426 I lannucci, Jeanne 384 Ikeda, Valerie 392 Imming, Philip 175 Ingram, Bertha 385 Ingram, Donald 346, 426 Inn, Phil 239 Inslee, Jay 271. 369 Isbrandtsen, Niel 370 Ishimatsu, Gail 368 Isogaya, Kazuyoshi 458 Israel, Andrew 387 I to, Tsuneo 395 J Jackson, David 382 Jackson, J. 363 Jackson, Michael 177 Jacobs, Diana 393 Jacobs, Douglas 431 Jacobs, Gregory 346, 444 Jacobs, Stephen 346 Jaffe, David 459 Jaffc, Richard 433 Jagd, Susan 346 Jago, John 463 Jahnke, William 381 James, Bruce 442 James, Edward 397 James, John 411 James. Mary 142 Jamison, Jim 138 Janger, Bruce 455 Janke, David 452 Jaques. Audrey 346, 467 Jarrell, Wesley 467 Jasaitis, Jennifer 144 Jefferson. James 396 Jenkins, James 335, 346 Jenkins. Michael 403 Jenks, Maureen 442 Jennison. Kathleen 387 Jensen, Kirk 461 Jensen, Peter 448 Jensen, Robert 426 Jensen, Tove 457 Jcr, Don 446 Jessen, Raymond 461 Jcssop, Carol 142 Jessup, William 259 Jewett, Jan 388 Job, Brian 363 Johnson, Barbara 346, 373 Johnson, Brent 346, 419 Johnson, Bruce 399 Johnson, Christopher 224 Johnson, David 346 Johnson, Henry 346 Johnson. J. Lee 418 Johnson, Jeanne 388 Johnson, Jeb 271 Johnson, Julie 346 Johnson, Joann 368 Johnson, Leslie 138. 346 Johnson, Lem 386 Johnson, Stanley 457 Johnston, John 361 Jolley, Michael 346 Jones, Cindy 346 Jones, Daly 403 Jones, Herman 378 Jones, Jeannette 372 Jones, Leslie 144 Jones, Mark 461 Jones, Nancy 346 Jones. Steven 297, 346. 429 Jones, Tom 297 Jones, Thomas 346 Jordan, Lee 172 Jordan, Charles 413 Jordan, Peter 138, 346 Jordan, Stephen 346, 446 Jordan, Thomas 461 Josephs, Rob 422 Joynes, Daniel 461 Jubb, Stephen 239 Juckett, Lee 175, 346 Julian, James 138 Justman, Harold 144 Justman, Mark 144 K Kadzicl, Ronald 239 Kaehler, Edwin 142 Kaffen, James 239 Kahler. Richard 457 Kahn, Jonathan 459 Kalian, Carla 363 Kam, Michael 178, 396 Kanauer, Scott 224 Kaplan, Ann 366 Kaplan, Margaret 371 Kaplan. Paul 346.412 Kapp, Lauren 363 Kardong, Donald 263. 297, 429 Karlin, Kenneth 346 Karowsky, Lynn 178 Karper, Robert 300 Kasavan, Patricia 366 Kasbeer, Richard 448 Kasper, Robert 138 Katagi, Jon 396 Katemopoulos, Maureen 364 Kato, Bcrton 346 Katsuda, Richard 365 Katz, Seth 385 Kauffman, James 297 Kauhanen, Kristine 392 Kauhanen, Keith 442 Kazlauskas, Birule 346. 370 Keating, Richard 463 Keberlein, Michael 395 Keefer. David 346 Keelin, Thomas 305 Keene, Terence 413 Keeran, Sally 144 Keller, Cynthia 346 Keller, Philip 346 Kelley. William 384 Kelly. William 334. 335 Kelsey. Thomas 396 Kemp, Susan 370 Kendall. William 346 Kcniston, Allen 175 Kennedy, Elizabeth 405 Kent, James 425 Kerncr, Jordan 422. 423 Kerr, Kathleen 454 Kewman, Donald 142 Keyes, Christopher 271 Khan, Sikandar 458 Kidde. Thomas 197, 438 Kidder, Donald 444 Kilduff. Marshall 182 Kille, Andrew 178, 451 Killefer, Campbell 431 Killefer, Wade 239, 303, 416, 417 Kim, Karen 368 Kim, Sharonroso 198, 361 Kimball, Frederick 432 Kimball, Richard 396 Kincaid, Randall 175 King, John 346 King, Konard 346, 459 King, Melissa 375 King, Rich 138 Kingrey, Jean 379 Kingsland, Holly 392 Kinsella. Paula 201, 346 Kintigh, Keith 178, 363 Kirby, Barbara 387 Kircher, Elsa 371 Kircher, Mary 169, 346 Kirkpatrick, C. 144 Kirschner, Robert 303, 448 Kistler, Stephen 452 Kistler, Henry 452 Kitsman, Charles 422, 423 Kizer, Kenneth 425 Klein, Leslie 175, 397 Klein, Thomas 239, 365 Kline, Charlotte 346 Klippert, Younger 239, 452 Kloos, Michael 239, 425 Knight, John 347, 432 Knott, Bob 138 Knudson, Pamela 347 Knutsen, Mary 366 Kobayashi, Joyce 163 Koblik, Philip 142 Kodama, Koji 461 Koehler, Bonnie 375 Koehn, John 239 Kohn, Edward 182 Kojiro, Daniel 391 Kompfner, Helen 378 Kondrat, William 451 Kong, Norman 396 Kooiker, Clarence 178 Kooker, Elizabeth 347 Koranda, Kenneth 452 Korpi, Stephen 347 Kortlander, Anne 347 Koski, Raymond 391 Kostant, Ralph 182 Kottke, John 142 Kraft, Kenneth 178, 179 Kramer, James 347, 431 Kramer, Laurey 401 Kratka, Margaret 375 Kratka, Guynoir 392 Kreitman, Richard 399 Kremers, Carolyn 371 Kretz, Alondo 347 Kretz, Arvid 297, 263 Kreyche, Gene 403 Kridcl. Russell 198, 347,411 Krieger, Karen 138 Kriogcr, Susan 387 Kroener, John 438 Kronstadt, Michael 458 Krug, John 429 Krute, Stanley 182 Kruth. Maurice 381 Kuchenbecker, Stephen 271,444 Kuhl, Kathcrino 347 Kuhl, Michael 347 Kumasaka, Andrew 387 Kunkel, John 398 Kuntzelman, Kenneth 175, 459 Kuramoto, Michael 347 Kurisu, Frances 347, 428 Kurita, Samuel 444 Kurjan, Philip 458 Kurtz, Katharine 363 Kurzner, Sally 367 L Labriola, James 431 Lachman, Donald 441 Ladato, Jim 452 Laidlaw, Bruce 438 Laird, Philip 347 Laird, Pauline 399 Lallas. Tom 144 Lam, David 347 Lam, Maurice 463 Lambert, Anthony 451 Lamborn, Jeffrey 299 Lamon, Kathryn 379 Laney, David 142, 439 Longdon, Stephen 347 Lannin, Donald 347, 457 Lapsys, Michael 144, 347 Larkin, Janice 388 Larsen, David 297 Larsen, Greg 448 Larsen. Shannon 457 Larson, Lois 374 Larson, Paul 429 Lasater, Jack 239 Lash, David 179, 347,429 Lassen, Gary 347, 431 Lau, Linus 259 Lau, Lans 444 Lau, Roca 375 Laughton, Craig 387 Lauterio, Richard 175, 396 Lavalley, William 436 Laverty, Mary 144 Lawrence, Mark 190 Lawrence, Richard 305, 391 Lawrence, Robin 374 Lawry, George 175, 440 Lawson, Jack 263, 297 Lawver, Lawrence 347 Laybourn, Ross 448 Lazetich, Pete 239. 425 Leach, Robert 199 Leafgren, John 347 Leathers, Michael 452 Ledford, Deborah 142 Lee, Annabeile 442 Lee. Barbara 224 Lee, Gordon 347 Lee, Phyllis 347, 379 Lee, Thomas 432 Leedy, Ann 144 Leep, Jeffrey 422, 423 Leeper, Robert 361 Leeson, Fred 182 Leeuwenburg, Patsy 348, 370 Lehman, Steven 387 Lehner, Doriana 348, 433 Leicher, Richard 175, 348. 429 Leidersdorf, Craig 439 Leighton, Mark 239, 396 Lemus, Elizabeth 392 Lempereur, Douglas 423 Lenk, Russell 239, 369 Lenoir, Zemmar 385 Lenz, Ronald 391 Leone, Kenneth 458 Leone, Peter 387 Lerch, Barbara 181 Leslie, John 175 Lettunich, Anthony 348, 439 Leung, Wing 259. 348, 463 Levin. Ed 441 Levin, Jeremy 299 Levine, Henry 361 Levine, Robert 388 Levinson, Catherine 348 Levine, Ronald 374 Levinson, Henry 348 Levine, Steven 426 Levine, Alicia 138 Levine. Leslie 138 Lewis, Alan 388 Lewis. John 348 Lewis, Kenneth 387 Lewis. Rodney 303, 436 Lewis, Wayne 175 Leydeckcr, Lynno 348 Lichtenstein, Gregg 175 Liffert, Matt 385 Lightfoot, Dan 239, 348 Lima, David 377 Lincoln, Larry 348 Lind, Bradley 271,448 Lind, Philip 397 Lindell, Jeffrey 138 Lindley, Robert 297, 425 Lindquist, Claudia 395 Lindsey, Gary 348, 399 Lingle, Marie 404 Link, Kenneth 444 Linke, Harold 175, 348 Linman, John 461 Linsenbardt, Duane 138 Linsmaycr, J. 458 Lintner, C. 426 Lissant, Joyce 379 Litner, Kim 303 Litterman, Robert 182 Little, Dennis 396 Littleboy. Kate 372 Liu, Edison 391 Liu, Frances 375 Liu, Francis 382 Livesey, Steven 239, 386 Lo. Clifford 175 Lockman, Donald 300 Loden, Jim 444 Lofgren, Susan 348, 385 Lofgren, Kurt 300, 411 Logan, Robert 348. 431 Lohn, Linda 401 Loken, Keith 381 Lombardi. David 138 Long, David 388 Long, Philip 175. 428. 429 Lonsdale, Fred 436 Lopcr, Suzanne 181,375 Lopez, Glenn 378 Lopez, Louis 467 Lopez, John 397 Lopez, Linda 372 Lortscher, John 369 Loveland, William 413 Loveman, Charles 303 Loving, Edith 455 Lowe, Janice 361 Lowell, Susan 144 Lowenstoin, Paul 426 Lowenthal, Nancy 367 Lowry, Linda 172 Loye, Mark 175, 463 Loy, Janwyn 373 Luck, Nadya 348 Luehring, Shirley 348, 463 Lujan, Miguel 462 Luk, Jeffrey 178, 463 Lundbcrg, James 175, 440 Luttner, Luella 348, 375 Lyman, Phillip 348 Lynn, Christopher 348 Lynn, Richard 436 Lyon, Nancy 348 M Maas, William 348 McAvity, Thomas 297 McBride, Lawrence 349 McBride, Terence 349, 416, 417 McCabe. Dwight 381 McCall. John 305 McCall. Kim 175 McCarthy, Todd 398 McCarthy, Dennis 429 McCarthy, Mary 390 McCarthy, Thomas 349 McCaughorty, Ted 430 McCauley, Paul 363 McChrysial, Steve 440 McClatchey. James 411 McCloud, Charles 239 McClure, Michael 446 McClure, Tim 239 McCluskey, Robert 442 McConnell, Michael 436 McCormick, James 170, 239, 349 McCormick, John 239, 396 McCormick, Nancy 368 McCormick, Pamela 349 McCormmach, Bruce 297 McCoy, Thomas 442 McCutcheon, Douglas 349. 459 McDavid, David 175 McDonald. David 349, 381 McDonald, Douglas 142 McDonald, Kenneth 416, 417 McDonald, Robert 398 McDowell, Richard 442 McElwain, Douglas 297 McGarrey, Richard 428 McGaughey, Margaret 349 McGeary, Scott 175, 397 McGilvray, Alexander 444 McGilvray, Anne 170, 349 McGilvray, Caroline 375 McGowan, John 419 McGriff, Christopher 436 McGuire, Patrick 389 McHarness, Donald 458 McHenry, Douglas 399 Mclnnes, Marion 364 McKee, Constance 457 McKenna, Kathleen 175, 177, 371 McKenzie, Gary 429 McKenzie, Larry 396 McKinney, Donald 387 McLain, Gale 349 McLaughlin, Edward 349 McLennan, Thomas 436 McLennan, Thomas 429 McMahon, David 396 McMahon, Noil 349 McMorris, Sherman 385 McMonagle, James 349 McMullen, Dennis 178, 179, 259 McNabb. Nancy 349, 386 McNair, Kevin 297 McNary, Susan 349. 404 McNellis, Kathleen 138 McNoble, Dorothy 363 McPhaul, William 349.426 478 479 480 McRoskey, Cecilia 197, 371.442 Maas, William 440 MacBird, Bonnie 392 MacDonald, Duncan 297 MacDonald, Francis 457 MacDonald, Reid 436 Machado, Michael 175. 348, 442 Macias. Anthony 457 Macklin, Wendy 401 MacMillan, John 411 MacPherson, Helen 144 Madigan, Brian 414 Madokoro, Glenn 349 Madsen. Ellis 175 Maes. Gary 349 Magill, Alice 399 Magnuson, Michael 349 Magruder. Sue 368 Magrudcr, Dale 452 Maharam, Rceni 393 Maher, John 457 Mahoney, Marta 185, 349 Mahoney. Michael 175 Mallek, Robert 170, 444 Mallery, James 297, 349 Mallory, Ann 138 Mallory, Susan 349 Mann, Fred 182 Manning, Bayless 178 Manoogian, John 418, 419 Mansfield, Frederick 455 Mantooth, David 349. 442 Manzolati, John 423 March, Kathryn 432 Margala, Kenneth 425 Margot, Alan 299.411 Marian. Ronald 142 Marienthal, Paul 299 Marinaro, Nicholas 144 Marinovich, Craig 439 Markosian, Bruce 378 Marks, Linda 349 Markwood, William 444 Marquardt. Donald 458 Marshall, James 419 Marshall, Larry 463 Marshall, Robert 448 Marshall, Susan 364 Martens, Deborah 373 Martin, Christopher 138, 175 Martin, Edward 271 Martin. Gerald 178, 395 Martin, John 382 Martin, Joseph 239 Martinez. Jose 441 Martinez, Luis 391 Marx, Richard 365 Marz. Charles 179 Mascovich, Paul 349, 412 Masarie, Michael 349,411 Mason, Herbert 452 Mason, John 423 Masse, William 440 Massey, James 142 Massimino, John 426 Masten, Marilyn 401 Masunaga, Laura 349 Mathews, Alan 426 Mathewson, Phillip 349, 454 Matlock, Michael 175, 300. 444 Matoian, John 349, 411 Matsuda, Yoshiyuki 455 Matsukado, Laurel 467 Matsuda, Nora 366 Matsumoto. Steve 396 Matsuura, Stacey 382 Matthcwson, Phillip 178 Mattox, John 381 Matuna, Joanne 370 Mau. Norman 178, 382 Maxwell, Valerie 378 May, Judith 403 Mayer, Jolie 389 May hew, Ellen 191, 349 Maylie, James 462 Mayo, Keith 418 Meagher, Daniel 425 Meagher, Michael 305, 438 Mcairs, Stephen 376 Medlen, John 419 Meeker, Suzanne 373 Mee, Toni 428 Mejia, Eduardo 144 Mela. Alan 175 Mellor, Margaret 335, 349 Moncuccini, Alfred 439 Mendius, John 399 Mendoza, Edward 391 Mendoza, Juan 175 Menees, Richard 144 Mcncndez, Jose 374 Mcnser, 8ruce 271 Menz, Charles 263, 297, 461 Merchant. Michael 142, 349 Meredith, Allen 297 Morrell, Edward 459 Merrill, James 239. 444 Mcrwin, Rich 436 Mesa, Lois 197, 349. 428 Mesick, Dennis 461 Moyer, Barbara 390 Meyer, Dennis 178, 182 Moyer, Joan 144 Meyer, Katharine 349 Meyer, Robert 220, 363 Meyer, Ronald 396 Meyer, Thomas 365 Meyer, William 369 Meyers, William 239 Michael, Philip 398 Michaels, Phyllis 373 Michelet, Robert 182 Mickelson, Hal 451 Michel. Michael 271 Mielkc, Paul 398 Miland, Michele 392 Milburn, Michael 418 Miles, Donald 191,418,419 Mileski, Sandra 349 Miller, Craig 175, 350.412 Miller, Constance 144 Miller, David 365 Miller. Frank 182 Miller, Nicholas 441 Miller. Richard 175 Miller, Robert 350. 448, 452 Miller, Roy 385 Miller. Wayne 452 Miller, William 175, 350, 440 Milton, Garlyn 372 Milwid. Mary 350 Mindrup, Paul 398 Miner. Diane 350, 401 Minor, John 397 Minton, James 387 Mirchandani, Dilip 350 Mitchell, Donald 224 Mitchell, Katherine 372 Mitchell. Nancy 350 Mithun, Robert 414 Mittelstaedt, Brian 263, 297. 397 Miwa, Judith 350 Miyamoto. Theodore Moc. Stephen 350 Moehrke, Peter 144 Moitoza. James 413 Molina, Joanne 363 Montague, Jane 367 Montante, Gary 175, 350 Montenegro, Maria 462 Montes, Alejandro 381 Moody. John 416.417 Mooney. Douglas 396 Moore, Charles 271, 425 Moore, Dennis 239 Moore, Jean 371 Moore, John 436 Moore, Leonard 175. 198. 350. 429 Moore, Marilyn 350 Moore, Michael 439 Moore. Miles 239. 425 Moore, Patrick 239 Moore, Robert 423 Moore. Robert 239, 424 Moore. Shawn 350.413 Moore. Thomas 350. 452 Moran, Mary 405 Moran, Winifred 350 Morck, Fred 142 Moreton, Cynthia 350 Morgan, Brian 448 Morgan, Gregory 376 Morgan, Jane 403 Morgan, Nancy 404 Moriarty, William 451 Morris, James 437 Morrison, Christopher 423 Morrow, Daniel 439 Morrow, Dennis 175, 300, 350, 454. 456,457 Morton, Kathy 387 Moscini, Lynettc 392 Moser. Robert 439 Moskitis, Richard 391 Mosley, Harry 385 Moulton, Emi 350 Moulton, Elizabeth 363 Mowcll, Lawrence 432 Mowery, Carol 404 Moxon, Keith 378 Moy, Thann 350 Moyer, Timothy 426 Muchmore, Douglas 439 Muirhead, Thomas 396 Mulder. Louis 374 Mulford. Donald 239. 382 Multani, Murli 381 Mumaw. Laura 364 Munks, Yvonne 167 Muranaga, Kciji 350, 456 Murarka, Ramesh 395 Murphey, Robert 442 Murphy, Helen 181. 400 Murphy, John 448 Murphy, Katherine 387 Murphy, Marcella 373 Murphy, Phillip 239 Murphy, Terry 446 Murray, Charles 411 Murray, Gary 239 Murray, James A. 461 Murray. James M. 305 Murray, Pamela 181 Muser, George 303 Mussack, John 463 Mutant, Leroy 350 Mutschlcr. Linda 392 Myers. Ann 197, 399 Myers, Lucia 371 Myers. Susan 372 N Nabseth. Pamela 350 Naff, Duane 463 Nahapetian. Armen 381 Nakadate, Mary 363 Nakagawa. Dean 350 Nakagawara, Jon 386 Nakanishi, Kenji 381 Nakata, Michael 444 Nancarrow, Clifford 182, 391 Nanney, Donald 457 Nardinelli, Clark 369 Narkewicz. Janet 142.386 Neely. Robert 351, 446 Neff. James 351,411 Neil, Susan 351 Neill. Katherine 138. 351 Neilson, Eva 458 Nelson, Bryan 426 Nelson, Craig 345 Nelson. Donald 198 Nelson. Gerald 175, 396 Nelson, Gordon 144 Nelson, Kenneth 391 Nelson. Michael 303, 351. 381 Nelson. Peter 351,428 Nelson, Roger 199 Nelson, Russell 463 Nelson, Steven 351, 418, 419 Nemec, Neil 390 Neukom, Daniel 414 Neville, Mary 363 Neville. Betsy 192, 351 Newburgh. Gretchen 375 Newman, Carol 351 Newman, Russell 365 Newman, Stephen 439 Newmark, Lorraine 390 Newton, Mary 351 Niccolls, William 351 Nicholas, Leo 182 Nicholas, Nick 458 Nichols, Ted 416, 417 Nicholson, Alexander 351 Nicholson, Robert 271,425 Nicholson, Nick 459 Nicholson, Sandra 455 Nickoloff. James 351 Nicola, Janice 372 Nicola. Thomas 351. 399 Nicolson, Nancy 387 Nielsen, Donald 377 Niemcyer. Gary 351 Niemi. Leslie 175, 182 Nightingale, Steven 271 Nissen, Steven 144 Nolan, William 175, 389 Noonan, Timothy 220, 396 Norberg. Henry 351 Nordecn, Christine 393 Norgaard, Christopher 351 Norman, Carol 351 Norman, Gordon 430 North. Thomas 351.436 Norton. George 377 Norton, Sarah 201 Novak. Anne 197, 364 Noyes, John 436 Nuwer.Marc 351,418.419 Nyarady, Stefan 300 Nye, Charlotte 403 Nystcdt, Georgia 138 481 Q O Oakford, Fred 138, 386 Oatman, Homer 419 Obanesian, Greg 458 O'8rion, Michael 138 Ockman, Carol 144 Odell, William 224 Offen, David 175 Offstein, Jerrold 179 Ogata, Kathryn 392 Ogo, Ellen 372 O'Grady, Kathleen 138, 351 O'Hare, Mary 351.379 Okaido, Nori 446 Okamoto, Minoru 437 Oki. Dan 391 Okino. Craig 455 Okuno, Masahiro 374 Olavarri, Teresa 368 Olbricht, William 389 Olds, Hildc 351, 378 Oleson, Raymond 437 Olcson, Bob 175 Oliver, Dianne 351 Oliver, Richard 239, 425 Olsen, Eric 455 Olsen, Kristin 351 Olsen, Petter 142, 374 Olsen, Alan 178 Olson, Robert 175 O’Meally, Robert 351 O’Meara, Robert 438 Omoro, Hisako 392 Onaka, Gordon 396 O’Neill, Dennis 271.425 Ong, Mayling 351 Orchard, David 351 Orellana. Carlos 419 Orlean, David 299, 455 Ormond, Paul 448 Ortmeyer, David 459 Osborn, Gregory 271,351, 444 Osborne, David 397 Osborne, Miguel 351,438 Osterholt, James 335, 351 Osterloh, Marta 351 Ostrander, Clinton 297, 413 Oswald, Susan 368 Otsuki, Ladene 455 Ott, Susan 432 Otte. Vince 351,463 Ouellette, John 351 Overling, 8ruce 305 Overly, Peter 419 Owen, Dugald 386 Owens, Jake 351.428, 429 Owusu, Lawrence 467 P Packard, Richard 411 Packer, Craigic 396 Page, Stephen 438 Painter, Gregory 446 Palmer, Bruce 352 Palmer, Stephanie 352 Panosian, Jeffrey 455 Papale, Lawrence 446 Papalo, Nancy 367 Papanek, Paul 419 Papanek, Karen 368 Pape, Gary 352, 452 Pappas, Nicholas 466 Parish, Don 239 Park, Kwang-Chun 374 Parker, Charles 352. 451 Parker, Dale 398 Parker, Gregory 299 Parker, Linda 374 Parker, Stephen 432, 433 Parkins. Robert 388 Partman, Jim 458 Past, Jerry 396 Pasarell, Stanley 299, 436 Passafuime, Phillip 352, 452 Passett, Melissa 373 Patt, Douglas 259, 303 Patty, Pamela 352 Paul, Skip 138 Payne, Shirley 378 Pearson, Joan 352, 370 Pearson. Steven 352 Peart, Douglas 448 Peck, Charles 436 Peck, Caroline 399 Peck, Lisa 144 Pedroni, Don 413 Pegram, William 363 Pekias, Kostas 365 Pendelton, Peter 142 Peral, Richard 185 Percy, Roger Dickerson 352 Pereira, John 363 Perez, Albert 462 Perez, John 352 Perez, Rosa 364 Perez, Mary 167 Perez, Una 386 Perez, Valentin 396 Pcrlce, Alfred 425 Perloff, James 182, 398 Perluss, Dennis 182, 352 Perrone, Michael 352 Perry, Douglas 352 Perry. Francis 436 Perry, Herbert 352 Perry, Rod 352 Pervere, Peter 436 Pete. Michael 352, 429 Pete, Robert 365 Peters, Gary 448 Peters, Judith 366 Peterson, Al 259 Peters, Roberta 167 Peterson, Chris 175, 411 Peterson, Craig 352 Peterson, Cyndic 372 Peterson, Dennis 239 Peterson, Eric 352 Peterson, Harries 381 Peterson, John 352, 413 Peterson, Kenneth 175, 432 Peterson, Kathleen 142, 385 Peterson, Kenneth 179 Peterson, Susan H. 224 Peterson, Susan J. 390 Peterson, Thomas E. 436 Peterson, Thomas K. 352, 411 Peterson, Todd 297, 452 Pcttcngill, Robert 432 Pettigrew, Richard 429 Petty. Brent 352 Petty. Richard 178 Pfingstel. James 439 Pfister, Thomas 271 Phillips. Gregory 384 Phillips, Maureen 467 Phillips, Michael 452 Phillips, Sandra 387 Phillips. Susan 352 Philpot, Kenneth 438 Pick, Bernard 352, 426 Pickrcll, Don 431 Pickthorn, Janet 367 Pietrowski, Robert 352 Pietzsch, Michael 201 Piggott, George 144 Pinkerton, Michael 413 Piper, Forrest 396 Place, Jennifer 352 Plaggerman, Mitzi 181 Plagge, Werner 175 Platt, Stephen 239, 452 Plummer, Anne 181, 368 Plunkett, James 239, 424 Podczerwinski, James 438 Polk, James 413 Pollock, Linda 352, 403 Pollock, Madeline 197 Pollock, Phillip 352 Polly, Susan 352, 373 Ponds, Louise 373 Pong. Eleanor 368 Poohar, Stephen 352, 436 Pool, Joseph 422 Poon, Richard 378 Pope, Frank 144 Porter, Brian 239 Porter, Gerald 352, 397 Porter, Kathryn 352 Porter, Marcia 352, 401 Porth, Ellen 403 Potter, Linda 352, 403 Potter, Rebecca 372 Powell, Berkeley 448 Powell, Jerry 300 Powell, James 422 Powell, Norborne 352 Powell, Robert 389 Powell, William 172 Powles, Jim 387 Powlison, Daniel 382 Pratt, John 423 Pratt, Lili 384 Preble, Gary 438 Preissler, Paul 300 Prendergast, Dan 462 Preston, Patrick 239 Price, Laurie 182 Price, Kelley 377 Price, Allyn 401 Prickett, James 412 Pridgeon, James 352 Pricwe, Mark 397 Prim, Ted 442 Pringle, Robert 444 Prissier, Paul 444 Pritzker, Nancy 353 Proctor, George 448 Prohmo. Cleo 404 Provandie, Paul 431 Prudek, Frederick 459 Prudhcl, Timothy 353, 446 Psaltis, Gregory 353, 446 Purdy, Katharine 404 Putnam, William 142 Pyle. Charles 353. 441 Pyne, Stephen 378 Quan. Joanne 353 Quan, Lawrence 175, 182 Qucstad. Philip 458 Quigley, Dan 353 Quillinan, James 353, 422. 423 Quinn, Lisa 362 Quinn. Michael 448 Quinta. Joe 436 Quist. Kevin 259, 426 R Rabone, Geoffrey 175 Racicot, Hillbilly 412 Rael, Gregory 381, 438 Raff, Douglas 175, 451 Rafferty, Christopher 303, 353, 448 Rague, Suzanne 387 Raines. John 300, 353, 429 Raines. Randall 382 Ralston, Gregory 396 Ramage, Wendy 366. 367 Rankin, Wiley 399 Ransom, Patricia 372 Rasmussen, Christian 142 Rathbun, Mark 384. 385 Rausch, Robert 353 Ravits, Martha 375, 443 Ray, Elizabeth 395 Ray, Susan 457 Ray more, Paul 259, 353 Read. Page 197, 426 Reagh, John 353 Redburn, Chris 455 Redenbaugh, John 182 Redlich, Christopher 448 Redwine. David 353 Reed, Ida 455 Reed, John 391 Reed, Roger 179. 191, 353. 418 Reeder, John 395 Reel, Joan 353 Reese, William 353, 447 Reeves, David 446 Reeves, Melanie 368 Rehfeldt. Ethel 403 Reichert, William 458 Reid, Gary 175, 457 Reinhard, 8ob 239, 424, 425 Rcinhard, David 431 Reinholm, Erik 175, 423 Rendahl, Joy 224 Rettig, Dale 440 Revzin. Philip 182, 382 Rewick, Virgil 175 Reyna, Robert 396 Reynolds. Amanda 372 Reynolds, Scott 271 Rhoades. Daniel 361 Rhodes, John 436 Rice, John 436 Rice, Thomas 391 Richards, Michael 412, 413 Richardson, Ann 138 Richardson, Clement 305 Richardson, David 436 Richardson. Paul 201 Richcda, Russell 353 Richelieu, Ronald 365 Richmond, George 353 Richter, Erica 335, 353 Richter, Trudy 144 482 483 484 Ricupero, Adrianna 198 Riddell, John 259 Rider, Robin 375 Ridge, William 395 Riekes. Gary 239 Riese, Randolph 175, 398 Rigoon, Robert 197, 412 R'991®. Raymond 397 Rigos, Chris 178, 353,451 Riley, Lee 395 Rinder, Robert 353, 459 Riojas, Arturo 175, 451 Rippner, Robert 353, 448 Ritch, Herald 381 Ritchey, John 446 Ritter, Mary 353, 375 Ritter, Melody 404 Robbins, Karen 387 Roberds, William 239 Robert, Roger 457 Roberts, Donald 429 Roberts, Mark 440 Robertson, John 429 Robertson, Joan 429 Robertson, Shirley 353 Robertson, William 178 Robinson, Jeanne 405 Robinson, Sandra 373 Robinson, Sharon 378, 429 Robnett, Michelle 387 Robson, Jerome 178 Robustelli, Peter 455 Rocha, Paulo 457 Rodarte, Irene 388 Rodney, Debbie 399 Rodriquenz, William 377 Rodriguez, Ruben 395 Rogers, Anthony 353 Rogers, John 191,354 Rollefson, Pamela 354, 379 Rolph, Henry 354 Roman, Christopher 361 Romans, Kenneth 419 Rombach, Brigitte 362 Rooke, George 175 Rooks, Donald 374 Rodney, Mark 142 Roos, Constance 144 Rose, Andrew 452 Rose, Christine 405 Rose, Kimberly 197 Rosen, Charles 354, 378 Rosenfeid, Cathy 378 Rosenlieb, Carol 429 Rosenthal, Ellen 364 Rosenthal, Linda 220, 363 Rosenthal, Martin 416 Rosenzweig, Lawrence 271, 444 Ross. Charles 396 Ross, Donald 444 Ross, Eric 303 Ross, James 182 Ross, Margaret 375 Ross, Terrance 178, 354, 429 Ross. Steven 305 Ross, Thomas 354. 461 Ross. William 170, 444 Roth, Daniel 305 Roth, Randolph 178, 396 Rothwell, James 187, 430 Routh, Jerry 422, 423 Rowan, William 458 Rowe, David 436 Rowland, Kathleen 144 Rowland. Melanie 144 Ruben. Peter 199. 354 Rufener. Robert 389 Ruggeri, James 354 Ruiz. Coreen 372 Ruiz, Beatrice 395 Ruiz, David 175. 303. 363 Rund, Robert 354, 461 Rundall, Thomas 354, 463 Runkle, Isabelle 399 Ruppner. Robert 299 Rusco, Patrick 271, 396 Rushton. Elizabeth 367 Russell, David 354 Russell. Thomas 224. 354 Rustin, Terry 175, 182, 354 Ryan, Edwin 395 Ryan. Noel 369 Ryder, Beverly 401 Ryerson, Carlos 354, 416, 417 Ryu. Edwin 396 s Sabato, George 144, 354 Sabi, John 175 Sader, Robert 442 Saenz, Michael 142 Sagues, Paul 439 Saibel, Charles 239. 399 Said. James 354 St. John, Paul 354 Salazar, Marc 397 Salisbury, Cynthia 368 Salisbury, Lee 175 Samco, Richard 412 Sammons. Todd 175 Sampson, Gregory 239. 425 Sanchez, Tony 430 Sandberg, David 354, 448 Sande. John 239, 424. 425 Sanders, John 354 Sanderson. Dale 429 Sanderson, Reginald 239, 361 Santa, John 432 Sapin, Peter 300 Sapp, Terry 175 Sasano, Eric 457 Satre, Philip 239 Sawyer, Curtis 224 Sayre, Henry 436 Sayre, Lawrence 386 Schafer. Nathan 175, 220 Schaffer. Evan 457 Schall, Karen 405 Schallich. Timothy 239 Schefter, Kathryn 404 Scheinman, Peggy 144 Schein, Leonard 432 Scheublein, Joan 375 Schirra. Walter 443 Schlar. Dave 399 Schlesinger, George 376 Schlinger, Linda 354. 443 Schlosberg. Miles 381 Schmidt. David 396 Schmidt, Gretchen 384 Schmidt. Nancy 366 Schmitten, George 142 Schneider, Steven 354 Schneider man, Matthew 354 Schoenberger, John 363 School. Loren 354. 395 Schottstaedt, William 397 Schrey. Robert 355 Schroder, Karen 373 Schroeckenstein, David 442 Schoenlieber, Mike 431 Schubert, Linda 374 Schulman, David 391 Schultz, Jack 239 Schultz. Sally 366 Schumacher, Kirk 454, 458 Schumacher, Mark 355 Schumacher, Thomas 438 Schwab. Gregory 397 Schwager, Steven 452 Schwartz, Neil 197. 413 Scott. Dan 452 Scott. Peggy 399 Scott. Robert 175.381 Scott, William 239 Scurlock, Donna 363 Seago. Samuel 377 Seegmiller, Douglas 355, 455 Segerstrom. Sally 373 Segerstrom, Gail 373 Sehring, Sally 138 Seitz, John 426 Sekijima. Dale 138 Seley. Nan 371 Senders, Carla 355. 375 Sencchaut, Louis 458 Senuty. Peter 423 Serna, Irene 372 Seller, Bill 461 Sewell, Virginia 369 Seymour, Peter 239, 355 Shackelford. Charles 185 Shackelton, Susan 375 Shafer, Jane 181 Shaffer, Evan 175. 454 Shafroth, Frank 259 Shallic, Slug 452 Shank. David 448 Shannon, Helen 355 Shannon, Michael 452 Sharma, Bill 458 Sharp. Gil 271 Sharp. Dave 239, 425 Sharpe, Robert 355. 445 Shaver, Dennis 192, 384 Shaver. Gaius 452 Shaw. Dan 369 Shaw. Janet 138 Shaw. Sara 388, 390 Shawcroft, Robert 381 Shea. Patrick 163, 445 Sheehan. Dennis 239. 425 Sheela. Barton 144 Sheldon, Duke 377 Shelter, John 198. 444 Shelley. Mark 416 Sheng. Chai-Gi 374 Shenone. Bart 455 Shepherd, Diane 144 Shepherd, John 384 Sherman, Paul 220. 389 Shevell. Steven 442 Shibata, David 442 Shidler. Nita 455 Shields. William 459 Shift. Tom 452 Shih, Christina 403 Shim, Julie 458 Shipley, Devon 413 Shipley. Wendy 181,404 Shirley, Bryce 220 Shishido, Hiroshi 355 Shockley. Hillary 239 Shoen, Bruce 425 Shono, Yu taka 381 Shoor, Stanford 355 Shore, Lawrence 397 Shorn, Ron 419 Shouse, Mary 364 Showalter, Jean 372 Shreiber, Jim 444 Shroff, Girdhar 395 Shuer, Marjorie 428 Shulenberger. Chris 429 Shultis, Susan 355 Shur, Robert 361 Shutt. Jeff 381 Sibley, Allen 144 Siciliano, Anthony 384 Sidhu, Gursharan 374 Siebert, Pete 417 Siegfried. David 175 Siegler, Edward 440 Siegler, Ted 175 Siemon, Jeffrey 175, 239, 425 Siemon, Patricia 355 Siewiorek. Daniel 458 De Sieves. Charles 439 Silva. Jose 395 Simmons, John 365 Simmons, Mark 391 Simmons, Sanders 239 Simon. David 390 Simon, Stephen 271 Simonsen, Sally 363 Simpson, Deborah 400 Single, Douglas 239 Sisk. Elizabeth 392 Sisk. Sharon 355. 433 Sitton. Ruth 355 Sjoberg, Ann 392 Skaug, Diane 355 Skeffington, Thomas 355 Slack. Geoffrey 441 Slattery. Robert 444 Sloan, John 182 Smal, Tom 437 Smiegiel, Donald 414 Smiley, Arthur 239 Smiley, Robert 466 Smith, Alvin 412 Smith, Bernard 416, 417 Smith, Carolyn 355 Smith. Craig 305, 382 Smith, David 175 Smith, Elizabeth 355 Smith, Gail 437 Smith. Ian 374 Smith, Jay 369 Smith, John 397 Smith, Larry 432 Smith, Leonard 462 Smith, Marcia 364 Smith, Mark 259. 462 Smith, Mitchell 376 Smith, Nanette 362 Smith, Renee 392 Smith, Richard 355 Smith, Robin 355 Smith. Sharon 355 Smith, Stephen 463 Smith, Stanley 391 Smith. Terrell 239. 355 Smitmans, Deborah 387 Smothers, David 396 Snider, Henry 444 Snodgrass, Susan 364 Snyder. Linda 363 Snyder, Michael 451 Snyder, Thomas 355. 439 Sobolik. Michael 239, 397 Solomon, Karen 355 Sones, Thomas 239, 439 485 Sonnenschein, Linda 355 Sonnenschein, Peggy 392 Sood, Brij 458 Soon. Gerald 381 Sorensen, Theodore 386 Sotomayor, Manuel 175 Souder, Edmund 355 Sowards, Steven 396 Spaeth, Charles 397 Spaeth, Nicholas 397 Spanner, Robert 138 Sparks, Burnice 355 Sparling, Jeffrey 355 Spaulding, Jill 405 Speas. Robert 303 Speidel, Russell 179, 355, 384 Speirn, Sterling 355 Spencer, Donald 175, 182 Spencer, Margaret 142 Spiro, Bob 138 Spitler, Mark 387 Spogli, Ronald 192 Spratt, Daniel 365 Sprout, Jermoe 439 Squeri, James 239, 416 Stacy, Sally 181, 405 Stalder, Jeffery 142 Standlee, Shhrley 197, 403 Stanfield, Judith 355, 404 Stanwood, Thomas 355, 448 Stark. Shelley 355 Stauffer, Robert 355. 448 Stebbins, Donald 303 Steckmest, Lawrence 299, 429 Steele. Donald 138, 300 Stein, Morton 355 Steinberg, David 437 Steiner, Barry 355 Stephan, Gregory 432 Stephens, David 175 Stern, Jody 364 Sternfeld, Steven 462 Storno. Richard 138 Stetler, William 356 Stevens, Jack 429 Stevens, Michael 356 Stevens, Patrick 271 Stevenson, Christie 393 Stevenson, David 416 Stevenson, Warren 239, 382 Stewart, James 356 Stewart, Melinda 405 Still, Pete 455 Stillinger, Scott 297, 429 Stillman, Michael 385 Stinchcomb, Patricia 370 Stivelman, John 144 Stiver, Charles 142, 439 Stocker, John 356, 446 Stoebner, Kerry 362 Stone, Barbara 356 Stone, Elizabeth 378 Stone, Glen 239, 396 Stone, Rocky 138 Stoner, Martin 387 Stong, Kent 413 Storek, Frederick 297 Storms. Stephanie 404 Stouder, Sharon 356 Stratton, John 271 Strausz, David 356, 446 Strauss, Gordon 432 Strick, Stephen 144 Strickman, Mark 182 Strong, John 300. 436 Stuart, Elbridge 411 Stubblefield, Philip 175 Stubbs. Brian 142 Stucky. Donald 178, 387 Stump, Kathleen 356 Sturdevant, David 431 Stuiz, Paul 390 Suckling, Barbara 356 Sud, Inder 374 Sudderth, Barry 462 Sudduth, Arel 392 Sudo, Masao 381 Suen, Theodore 303 Sunday. Pamela 392 Sundermcyer, Clayton 356 Sundquist, Carol 144 Sutherland, Karen 356 Sutro, Denis 426 Sutro, Michael 356 Swanberg, Richard 182 Sward. Martha 432 Sweeney, Maureen 169, 356 Sweetnam, Glen 398 Sweetwyne, Kermit 297 Swift, David 166 Switzer, Walter 444 Symmes, Marilyn 370, 386 Szybalski, Timothy 430 T Taapken, Edward 356 Taber, James 458 Tabor, Chip 378 Taggart, Robert 456 Takahashi, Joanne 364 Talbot, Chris 367, 443 Tam, John 178, 461 Tammen, John 363 Tan. Ronald 356, 455 Tanaka, Karen 462 Tanner, Leonard 299 Tanner, Teresa 375 Taron, Timothy 271, 369 Taron, William 413 Tarun, Robert 430 Tashiro, Lani 378 Tate, Nancy 356 Tatum, John 426 Taylor, Allen 382 Taylor, Charis 432 Taylor, David 423 Taylor, John 440 Taylor, Marianne 462 Taylor, Susan 403 Taylor, Vernon 356, 426 Tedrow, James 356 Temby, Morgan 374 Tennant, Elaine 356 Tenold, Stanley 462 Tenney, Richard 297 Terry, Claude 271,448 Terry, Herbert 356, 376 Terry, Kenneth 423 Thaanum, Mel 356 Thom. Bruce 175,451 Thomas, Carol 404 Thomas, David 463 Thomas, Dean 455 Thomas, Frederic 297 Thomas, John 356 Thomas, Scott 432 Thompson, Barbara 366 Thompson, Barton 391 Thompson, Buzz 191 Thompson, Gary 356 Thompson, Robert 170, 442 Thompson, Susan 356, 401 Thorleifson, Thomas 442 Thorold, Oliver 138 Thorpe, Allan 404 Thurber, Barton 454 Thurber, Hurent 456 Thurber, Kent 300, 457 Tillman, John 381 Tinker, John 365 Tipps, Stephen 201, 377 Tipson, Dave 397 Tipton, David 239, 452 Tipton. Richard 239, 297, 459 Titesville. Scott 385 Tittmann, Paul 303 Toai, Nguyen 457 Toda, Bobby 444 Todd, Robert 356 Tofanelli, Carla 428 Tognotti, Helen 364 Tollefson, Donald 182 Tollefson, Stephen 443 Tollerud, David 175 Tom, Douglas 356 Tomlinson, Daniel 239 Tomlinson, Robert 455 Tonkin, Cheryl 403 Toomay, Timothy 423 Topic. James 300 Tonbara, Lynne 387 Toupin, James 369 Towner, Robert 452 Tracy, Mary 356, 403 Tramutt, Lawrence 356, 422, 423 Tribolet, Charles 381 Trompos, Emily 366 Trowbridge. Frank 175. 356, 461 Troxell, James 300. 457 True. Leighton 363 Trullinger, Daniel 389 Tseng, Alexander 175, 382 Tscu, Marvin 356. 431 Tucker. Mark 356 Tucker, Richard 144 Tupper, Lois 356 Tway. Kenneth 300 Twedt, Mark 452 Twomey, Dewey 239 Ty, James 396 Tyler, John 356. 426 U Umbeck, Gretchen 401 Underwood, Robert 263, 297 Ungar, Steven 172 Uppman, Michele 256 Upson, Michael 397 Uribc-L, Jesus 395 Utley. Rodney 297, 365 Uyemura, Dennis 356, 441 V Vanbrussel. Mark 397 Vandalsem, Vol 170, 444 Vandevanter, Michael 357, 463 Vanderschoot, Andy 419 Vanderstoep. Ann 392 Vanicr, Gary 305 Vankuran, Virginia 357 Vanlehn, Kurt 391 Vannest, Robert 382 Vasquoz, Chris 175, 369 Vataha, Randel 239. 425 Vernon, 8rent 357 Vernon, James 413 Vierling, David 175 Viken. Richard 357 Viney, James 395 Virga, Joseph 297 Vitunal. Charles 357 Volmert, John 396 Vossbrink. David 378 W Wachtel. John 431 Wade, Bart 426 Wagar. Roger 438 Wagner, Charles 377 Wagner. Jeanne 362 Wagner, Kathryn 357 Wagner, Linelle 364 Wainwright, Carol 363 Wainwright, Walker 444 Waldo. Robort 224 Walker. Cedric 458 Walker. Nancy 357 Walker, Rachel 198. 458 Walker, Richard 172 Walker, Trey 386 Wallace, Robert 455 Waller, Katherine 372 Walsh, Michael 439 Walsh, Mary 366 Walsh, Walter 440 Walsh, William 239 Walt, Christopher 144 Walters, Derrick 397 Walters, John 305, 384 Waltz, Teresa 393 Wang, Bernard 357 Wanders, Crayton 365 Wang. Cary 458 Wardenburg. Mark 461 Waring, Belle 384 Warkinton, Don 437 Warner, Douglas 429 Waser, Nickolas 175, 357, 432 Washburn, John 462 Washington, Demea 239 Washington, Gregory 144 Washington, Kevin 448 Wass, Catherine 181 Waters, Darrell 239, 452 Waters, Harry 300 Watkins, Steven 365 Watson, Ann 364 Watson, George 297 Watson, Steven 363 Watson, Thomas 305, 412 Watt, Alexander 357 Watts, Bonnie 401 Weaver, James 138, 467 Webb, Stephen 357. 428 Weber, Griffith 382 Webster. Abigail 372 Wee, Morris 357, 446 Weed, Kenneth 297, 444 Weed. Thomas 396 Weeks, Bradley 357, 454, 459 Weigle, Priscilla 400 Weiler, Thomas 414 Weinberg, Robert 175 Weinberger, Mark 182 Weiner, Donald 388, 390 Weiner. Bruce 357, 431 Welch, Clare 432 Welch, James 454 Welch. Truett 271 486 Welsh, Joseph 417 Wenke, Alison 142 Wenzell. Vanessa 395 Werner, Elise 405 Wcschc, Stephen 381 Wesler, Paul 138 Wczelman, Janice 370 Whedbee, Michael 378 Wheeler, Deborah 403 White, 8enjamin 259 White, Charles 436 White, Gregory 458 White, Harry 144 White, Randall 175, 224, 297. 431 White, Rolland 167, 448 Whitehouse, Rebecca 172, 357 Whitcing, David 297, 461 Whittaker, James 305 Whittaker, William 305 Whitten, Kenneth 357 Wiggins, Kathleen 372 Wigton, Elizabeth 138, 357 Wilbur, Laura 454, 455 Wilde, Kirstie 144 Wildman, Stephanie 357 Wildfogel, Dennis 458 Wiley, William 239, 369 Wilhelm, Robert 418,419 Wilkerson, Freda 368 Wilkes, Lucy 357 Wilkins, Randall 426 Willard. Patricia 170, 357, 364 Willert, Mark 411 Williams, Cris 443 Williams, Celia 364 Williams, David 239,391 Williams, Derek 175 Williams. Duke 239 Williams, Howard 239, 452 Williams. Lewis 438 Williams, Mary 181. 364 Williams. Michael 374 Williams, Richard 395 Williams, Raymond 361 Williams. Richard 416, 417 Williams, Thomas 175 Williams. Wendy 387 Wills, Yvonne 442 Wilson, Clark 381 Wilson, Craig 458 Wilson. Douglas 182. 442 Wilson, Mark 426 Wilson, Peter 357, 446 Wilson. Richard 142 Wilson, Robert E. 391 Wilson. Robert H. 396 Wilson, Sherman 357, 425 Wilson. Tom 418 Wilson, Wayne 357, 452 Winchester, Paul 187, 357 Windeguth, Adele 357 Windham, Patrick 391 Winkle. Christian 399 Winslow, Peter 144 Winslow, Thomas 138, 439 Winsor, Terry 271 Winston, Michon 404 Winter, Robert 358 Winthrop, Linda 144 Winthrop, Rob 411 Wise, Donald 197 Wise. James 239 Wiskocil, Robert 399 Witmer, Bruce 452 Witter, Helen 364 Witz, Linda 404 Wolf. Bernard 459 Wolf, Margaret 182 Wolf, Michael 191,440 Wolfe, Jonathan 411 Wolfe. Sara 358 Wong, Elaine 378 Wong, Hubert 358, 456 Wong, Richard 396 Wong, Timothy C. 444 Wong, Timothy Y. 175 Wonka, Warren 358 Wood, Christina 405 Wood, Craig 358, 442 Wood. Mark 358, 443 Woodbridge, Woody 138 Woodworth, Bonnie 358 Woolf, Alan 182 Woolley, Robinson 374, 463 Wright, Damon 177 Wright, Diane 358 Wright, James 358 Wright, Jeffery 398 Wright, John 439 Wright, John 299 Wright, Linda 175, 177. 368 Wright, Marily 358 Wu. Philip 182 Wyden, Ronald 198 Wynne, Anthony 358 Wyss, Claudia 467 Wyss, Wendy 172. 192. 370 Y Yamada, Keigo 395 Yamanaka, Gregg 376 Yancey. David 358, 412, 413 Yates, John 175 Ybarra, George 396 Yee, Sylvia 384 Ylitalo, Mary 144 Yoachim, James 382 Yoder, Stephen 358 Yorkston, Kathryn 358 Yoshimura, Michael 300, 358, 457 Yost, Mildred 358 Young, Candia 404 Young, Earl 381 Young, Florrie 456, 457 Young, Kay 358 Young, Lawrence 144 Young, Morley 374 Young, Robyn 455 Young, Shari 358 Yue. John 178 Yukimura, Joann 387 Yukimura, John 365 z Zadig. Michael 454, 458 Zalk, David 358 Zane. Nolan 384, 385 Zattiero, Glenn 384 Zeimer. Sally 172,358 Zeisler, Stephen 239 Zempel, Paul 398 Ziebron, William 369 Zima, John 369 Zimprich, Paul 363 Zoller, STephen 358 Zuckerman, David 387 487 the 1970 sfertqd Bd editor business manager head photographer darkroom manager academic editors activities editors athletics editor seniors editor residences editor opinion editor news assistant photo staff editorial staff cover designer RALPH C. PETERSEN WILLIAM R. ADAMS R. NEAL CAVANAUGH KIM HOWELL NIEL ISBRANDTSEN CHRIS REDBURN SHEILA HACKETT CORY HERRERA JOHN COGHLAN CHERIE CHARLES DAVE VELASQUEZ MAUREEN JENKS SAM CASEY BOB BEBB DAVE BITTS PAUL BOYD JON BRISKIN JIMMY CHEE BILL ELLSWORTH HENRY EU TIM GILL DOUG HAMILTON NEIL HELLER ALLEAN HUDSON BILL HUDSON BOB KASPER JOYCE LISSANT DAVE MEIHAUS LARRY POTOMAC NAN SELEY BOB SHEARER JOHN SLADE CARY SPAULDING MARILYN SYMMES STEVE WEBB JO DEE CATLIN STEPHANIE CHEW DEBBIE COLE SARAH FLANAGAN DAN GERKEN DOROTHY HARTLEY ROBBIE HERVEY JACK KUNKEL CHRIS NORDEEN LINDA ROSENTHAL MAUREEN SCHRADER JOHN E. POWELL