Stanford Law School - Yearbook (Palo Alto, CA)

Page 159 text:

X, Wg L f, i 'Y571:1,w 1- 4-45: :QE Wgff f-f , Y Y iff' ' ffl. -1 - F 551 'G - r,f,'a 1 .Lx 1---Vfw fy f 5 2 - . ' ? in ,, W M E, S W , if- rw ' 3 ,A ' -1-I 'f ' ,Xj 2 ' - v X: - , . 5: X. E. 5 ,mm JH X ,Xi M: mx, 1' - irq 12' ,, Xfyiegv Uv- 14' ,,:-:EjE:E5 'X, Y, -1-. 4 ' ,gin Wj H K, ' ,X f Y ' X xx-1 his Q 1 M N Mm, ,X G5 5 5 i-'55 K i f Qi-Heg.ff:a Ae ' 5 ma.. ge X M 555 '.- - - ' 1 , ,f 41- H. f ..- - . r L A 4: , ' ff i g-11421-. 4 la , E .S . FJ. ,,,. M , , , ,. ' 35 'v'g.l++ ,-fggntf.,-L--, '-'g. 'gig ,gig P' X . M , gf, ,355 il: le5E5L'a::g-35-1.L,.:,:: ygv un' M s-i'. 51. 'f I. -, W, N .' f-- -QQ: '2' 2 ' '3 'IM-A HU Xg :Es ,... : Hg. - gf, X1X - , X- ,--- M? Y - 'Q' V faf .rg XX!! 3 wg xx , gin ,. Z., AJ? 2 MDL Q, -4.5 1 I I 2,4 V XX - X . X X, AXr..X-XX X M ,XX X X , 'A 'J 4' 2 T: iq x '-1 Y' , . 'Q , Wififu 'lg Q' Lx3f3:4,, I fax, W ' 5333221111 ii,,w',, ugw' - E .54 , - J fl 5 ' . ' MWZ?!2 , Q T' QT v ,ESV 533551 ,, sw: .,, ,X l X- , xg Af - ,X 5 X . W , 4 X M312 W X38 'l. f ' lf5-f f -ati -W ingmiffgk if?-vw, ,' 1 -' K1 'S QQEEJQE ' 4291 3 f E ,Q ' VX XX ' qffgl iuf A -'M MQ 5. XXXX li I H W, 4f'X,f1ssw, 1-A - mfg, ..,., , ,W ' - I ' A fm W. , Q ,Q ' fi ' L- '-fT'f 'Egg I V ' - M Wt iw- W 'H !! V: 'W Hffxww 2, 'ff ' W , E' ' W '- -2' Q :Hifi .Wi , M A X 4, 5 f 'W ' i f 'L mgggfaiifgi' , , w ' -Q.: , 1 1 L , ' A H E W1 H, 'yiligi ,M Hg 5 xf '!' 11f1W5 :f3iifi3','1 m fm? A E QL? X6 X',, ., I ,HX V Y -sw' vw 'ww :gk ,F ,gipff HU - 'ff if I , 1v - ,M , -Q fi We ,, X . 1 XX W X wal? XXX JF X :rw ...,, XX XX ,XX X Xxx :X S-4 , Mm ,J--Syglu 5622 XM ,FJX gi, 1 WX c, , ' Hb X, , , XS-1 X ..XX gi, w ,,QuX.m-XXX ww., X XX ' gl XM nk i,, V ia , , X , ,J J 1. V A, iw Y mg,XXX:,, ummm XQX - S5514 N F gf- X X X 3 .j ,XX X, YHQXX.. w, XX XXX! '..X X Mm. .,5-if!! 3 X . 15- V rn-fig K 75- i iff 1' MQ, , gj 55 ' 2 :flak 1 A , - E '- ' 'lf c XXX XX JXXXXXN fig- W, M XX -X X vin XX XEXXXX XXXX XM X mi , -,,gX,G ig ' . - ' H mm ,, N M . , XXSXXXNE X QQNXX, XXXHXXXXSZ X XXXMXX X? A ', K , 55:7 L N 35, , g'w1,g, M 9915 ' me 'E 4 ' ' ' 'P' W W H sw, 'Wm H wgmu ' y , ' . W-Y S :S Mwfw H - H -' N P5555 1 :ggesfu,,,, ,wp - ' , , , gigs: X X , W wXXwXXgggj? M X N ,W ,M XX A 'A H .. ',,' ' - f ' Rf 5 'wwf-wpw ...W 1? ', i',.gff2 i-Iwmg 4 . A X fl X , Y , 'k ' 1 - w 'Iv' S --1 fm, 0 - gh' .1 - 4- , - .uv ,M fl, V ' wx ww M: H ' f went: V. K Q1 Y ,,,,.,.. ,, -. I ' M11 1 1 W' ' 'Ugg . fe gg Vi 2 fl: W EQQF1' x. if . ' . . 1 ml A , 1' ? 4 . af1'? ' N gifs, ,- E 'J C 1 :X 1 X 'ik 1 wi Wie' Q55 1? E., 3 ' Ee XXXX X - S , U5 Nw f f- f,gQ:m,LWHXkggi ' M .. ig? , ' A :Ez U H 3 1' .if 3 N 'H isa? f? .,2 1 : We X :X X ' - H+ XX' A 4,iE:wxxX,X,m if M 1 fe, , 3, Q W f f X X A ' 'V cr, N' 1 -'if' , wi' M W' Mlfy' ' , iii!-11 rw JJ 7 , X vw was Z ,, lx, g' 'A we XX ' . ge ug, i 'Lex A M Xin ,, , A ' KU 9,6 - ' M' N E Y N . H , 5 i Z! W W T ff ,, K ' ' H X XXX dfsiw Q 1 ,QQ is W K w T ,X X 'N 'Y ' , vs ' , M M., H W' x 51' ' 5 H 1 2 W 5 1 ' H122 X: L X w ' 1' XX Q jw , wx 5'2 ' W: 1 . ,J 1' S 9, XX X ,, .. , TNXX, X X , X X ' , wiiikil , WW x X KW.: XXQXXX XX M: Xsfggf, X X W fr H 'Qin-,Y as ggwwi XX

Page 158 text:

:Q wfw J 'fu Wgfizzgsfgi fi w 1 ,if W W, wx X , sam , is Ava-.ig-ani 'fx '.-- xmfsyg Am 'J vnfwx .KF-, W QA fx 3552235 2' w www 5 151 mx 51 ,, X ' X 4 vww, , Q 5 i ag. w it H , ffgsiga ,1 V w H www H :wi V l g ?l4 N U N' L a'i':sf if af, -Q 5 'g W mg? wu ,H w ,J .-9' ,y A , L ,f 2 gi- 4 + - , , 'W .E ,,. w aw N saw: NN A M. w - k J? JW, V 14, x M H ,, W, ,, vnu, l1QiQJ aY i I . - 3.-1 2 2 + V, Iv Am' Q Y ' , - mg I .nw ,f .

Page 160 text:

The Stanford Law Review's twenty-second year was full of transition, experimentation, and hard work. After considerable discussion, in a flurry of participatory democracy, and despite faculty misgivings, last spring the membership almost unanimously rejected the age-old method of selecting members on the basis of Hrst-year grades. Dubious about other means of preselection as well, the Review adopted a pay-as-you-go plan: Anyone can join at the beginning of his second year, and continued membership depends on satisfactory performance of the rigorous writing and publication duties. The new policy takes far fuller account of the Reviews proper role L W RE IEW LAW REVIEW: ROW 1 - M. Wise, M. McLennan, LaMothe, J. Dolezel, M. Burack, -R. Rothmeyer, . 'Pl' 71 is 95 ' o mn ' 5 ' QE 915' v-.III - cn 'J W3 Ear' P5 mi ' N Qu 29 2:4 O0 57? P2 702+-Joppy WU Matschullat, D, MacMeekin, G. Smith, R. Allen, . Curtis, A. Hemingway. ROW 3 - G. Mathiason, Jacobs, W. Kroener, A. Friedman, J. McGee, Westerbeke, P. Bewley, C. Bruton, J. Goodman, Bates, B. Klopfer. ROW 4 - M. Anderson, P. Bell, Wirtz, S. Schultz, C. Ryan, R. Kirst, J. Selna, . Timbie, R. Distad, W. Boyd, W. Rapson, T. Johnson, W. Stevens, H. Baumann, E. Tooby, C. Brody. educational experience. Writing is the major focus of Review membership. Immediately upon joining, a new member begins the process of selecting a topic on which to write. His ideas and research are subjected to as much intense critical analysis as his editors and his citechecker can bring to bear. Through a process of continual and mutual criticism and evaluation, Review members greatly improve their writing and analytical abilities. Students are encouraged to engage in field and empirical research in the preparation of their written work. The income of the Justin Miller Fund, established by Judge Miller for use by the Review in such research, made possible research for a study within the law school - as a source of of prosecutions for selective service offenses education in writing and analysis for all in the Northern District of Califomia. The students willing to work to obtain it. g Fund will undoubtedly enable the Review to The new policy avoids the unfairness of . rye, undertake similar projects in the future. offering a special brand of education to The educational experience afforded by an arbitrarily chosen few and the I qi the Review to its members encompasses divisive separation of Review members :i M Q, more than just writing. Its student editolrs, from the rest of the school. In Ei' 'i -rib-if-iiiti-.. '!1-'i' besides writing the notes that ill emphasizing self-selection, the Review LA approximately half the Review? pages, bear has taken a step toward placing control .L L., -MW-T.. responsibility for the substantive and formal over education where it belongs. C ,it ' accuracy of everything published in the At its ince tion, the Reviews new 4 4 Review. Every piece written by astudent or membership pglicy was unique in the 4 'ff' submitted by an author is citechecked: its country in several respects. Membership it ideas are challenged, the authority for each is open to any beginning second-year statement of fact is investigatedg every student without restriction. The policy paragraph is edited for clarity and form. does not constitute a competition, for 3 . During this process the student has a chance there is no limit on the number of f' to match wits with recognized authorities,as members. Instead of being treated as ' ' 'f f-wg , well as with other students, in many areas of candidates, new members become full Q-I A .W the law. This match results not only in the participants in the Review from the 4 4 7 improvement of the Review, but also an beginning. Finally, the policy change Z, ,r 4 ,ai increased student understanding of various became effective before it was necessitated by the school's adoption of the credit! no credit grading option. fMore than seven leading law reviews are currently considering adoption of an open-access membership policy similar to the Review's, at least partly under the stimulus of the speed of passffail grading which may deprive them of their primary membership criterion The structural changes, however, have not diluted the Reviews Q .-N faffva, areas of the law and different modes of thinking. Al th o u gh the Review operates independently of faculty supervision, as witness the membership policy change, faculty members are often consulted about problems within their particular areas of expertise. In add.ition, many notes result from faculty suggestions for topics. The Review is collectively grateful for the faculty's generous assistance in these respects. E. Norton Tooby