Stanford Law School - Yearbook (Palo Alto, CA)

Page 159 text:

LAW REVIEW BOARD OF EDITORS. FIRST ROW: V. Birch CBus. Mgr.J, B. Hoffman, J. Atwood, F. Paff, V. Williams, J. Owens, B. Bartels, J. Klevens, R. Odom, J. Huhs, J. Judson. ROW 2: R. Wirtz, O. Childs, M. Wheeler, J. Hoak, B. Moulton, D. Bradshaw, M. Harbers, J. Roberton, D. Matschallat, J. Selna. ROW 3: L. Aufmuth, D. Johnson, L. Calof, J. Adams, T. Todd, R. Yeamans, D. MacMeekin, S. Walters. ROW 4: M. Burack, R. Barliant, R. Kirst, J. Black, N. Tooby, J. Pandell. LAW REVIEW Twenty-one years ago the Stanford Law Review was founded with a dual goal: Hto publish a journal of worth to lawyers and to provide an educational experience of value to students. In the ensuing years the Review has developed to rank as one of the outstanding legal journals in the country. The goals of the editors of Volume 1 have been met, but the challenge to meet them in the future persists. To these ends the Review continues to work daily. The range of topics in Volume 21 attests to the diverse interests of its contributors. Chief Justice Marshall's Friend of the Constitution letters, recently discovered by Professor Gunther and -reprinted in the Review, provide the basis for further historical review of the McCulloch v. Malyland controversy as well as for additional debate upon the proper decision making role of Supreme Court Justices. In contrast, current legislative policies are discussed in Professor Baxter's article on compensation for the sonic boom damage caused by supersonic flight and in Professor Posneris article on the deregulation of natural monopoly markets. The student work in Volume 21 covers an equally broad range of subjects including an economic analysis of nuisance law, public-teacher strikes in California, jury deliberations in capital punishment cases in California, and American investment in Eastern Europe. The educational experience afforded by the Review to its members encompasses more than just writing. Its student editors, besides Writing the notes and comments that fll approximately half the Review 's pages, bear responsibility for the substantive and formal accuracy of everything published in the Review. Every piece written by a student or submitted by an author is citechecked: its ideas are challenged, the authority for each statement of fact is investigated, every paragraph is edited for clarity and form. During this process the student has a chance to match wits with recognized authorities as well as with other students, in many areas of the law., This match results not only in the improvement of the Review, but also in increased student understanding of various areas of the law and different modes of thinking. Writing, however, is the major focus of Review membership. Immediately upon becoming a member of the Board of Editors, a new reviewer begins the process of selecting a topic on which to write. His ideas and research are subjected to as much intense critical analysis as his reviser, his editors, and his citechecker can bring to bear. Through a process of continual and mutual criticism and evaluation, Review members greatly improve their writing and analytical abilities. Students are encouraged to engage in field and empirical research in the preparation of their written work. The income of the Justin Miller Fund, established by Judge Miller for use by the Review in such research, made possible research for a study of the effectiveness of Califomia child-abuse laws and a study of the small-claims-courts system throughout California. The Fund will undoubtedly facilitate similar projects in the future. Although the Review operates independently of faculty supervision, faculty members are often consulted about problems within their particular areas of expertise. In addition, many comments and notes result from faculty suggestions for topics. The Review has greatly benefited from this generous assistance from the faculty.

Page 158 text:

Dave DeWeese verifies the facts of a case As part of the Business Assistance Program, Ken Kaye discusses problems with an East Palo Alto businessman. Pat Cutler and Bobbi Miracle find the law a seamy web of paperwork. Jeff Jennings interviews a client while Ann Castro looks on.

Page 160 text:

LAW REVIEW STAFF. SEATED: J. Atwood fArticle Ed.J, R. Odom fManaging Ed.J, V. Williams QP1'esidentJ, F. Paff fArticle Ed.J, J. Judson CExecutive Ed.J. STANDING: J. Huhs fStudent Work Ed.J, G. Wright fStudent Work Ed.J, R. Bartles iBook Review Ed.J, J. Owens lStudent Work EdJ, J. Klevens fStudent Work EdJ, W. Hoffman fStudent Work Ed.J.