Stanford Law School - Yearbook (Palo Alto, CA)

Page 165 text:

JUDICIAL COUNCIL Iudicial Council: E. Wright CChairmanj, D. Ragen, W. Iohnson. The President of the Law Association, with the advice and consent of the Executive Board nominates the members of the Iudicial Council. This body is charged with the enforcement of the Stanford Fundamental Standard of student conduct and the Honor Code for student exam- inations. It also has jurisdiction over all cases PI-II DELT PI-II Miller Inn of Phi Delta Phi, active at Stan- ford Law School since l897, considers its major function that of providing a means of communi- cation both among the three classes and be- tween the students and the faculty. The frater- nity strives to accomplish this end through two means: social functions and programs designed to introduce the members of the Inn to extra- curricular areas of the law. The fraternityis social functions are designed to complement those provided by other Law School organizations and to provide an oppor- tunity for members to temporarily escape the rigors of the classroom by taking advantage of the social resources of the Bay Area. These functions have included such events as a din- involving alleged violations of these principles by law students, with power to make recom- mendations to the President of the University. The Iudicial Council supervises Law Associa- tion elections and may perform advisory or in- vestigatory assignments for other Law School organizations on an ad hoc basis. ner party in Chinatown and a trip to a San Fran- cisco Giants baseball game. Perhaps more important than social activities have been the bi-monthly luncheons with mem- bers of the faculty and guests from the legal profession. These luncheons have now become a popular tradition at the Law School. As an ex-h ample of the guests Phi Delta Phi has invited to these luncheons, the fraternity hosted a mem- ber of the legal staff of Pacific Gas and Elec- tric Company to discuss corporate law practice. Such luncheons have been very successful in providing the members of the fraternity an op- portunity to discuss issues germane to their legal education, law school policy, and the practice of law. Phi Delta Phi. Front Row: I. Huhs, I. North, A. Mendel, L. Allan fHistorianI, H. Iudd CMagistrarI H. Traeger, M. Matheson, M. Harbers, I. Hoak. Second Row: D. Cooper, I. Powers, I. Renton, S Luelf, R. Svaty, D. Dressler, R. McNitt, P. Lubeck, P. Mitchell. Not Shown: L. Levy CExchecquerD T. Harris CCIerkj, R. Arhelger, R. Arthur, B. Budin, D. Davidson, M. Hyde, R. Iack, A. Kovacovich D. Miller, G. Nickel, I. Stalnaker, V. Williams, G. York.

Page 164 text:

Prosecutor Kaplan questions Narcotics Expert McDonough during the presentation of United States v. Durtz. Iudge Constine ponders the evidentiary problems in the background. During the course of the trial of People v. Hood, a shoplifting case, Prosecutor Tim Flynn shows a People's exhibit to a witness. V' 4 ,afar 1:35591 M W V ,,.. . t. ,V ,,-1,53 , aww wmv-4' ,,,4,,yNwf MMWWWM wwnww , swf'-935 ,, 'f'2 .lwr , x 'Q-Ts.,,,, W K . .Y p ,gig-.i,1v5r', - , - ,H 161

Page 166 text:

I TRAMURALS The Law School was very active in the Uni- versity intramural program this year. A wide variety of sports, including touch football, bas- ketball, softball, cross-country, track, water polo, billiards, and bowling, were utilized by law students to release academic frustrations. Three teams represented the Law School in football. Two of the teams were composed pri- marily of third-year students, the other of first- year students. The first-year team, playing as BLACKACRE B was undefeated during the regular season, piling up two impressive 70-0 and 35-6 victories. They lost a close 7-6 game in the all-school play-offs. The outstanding third-year team was the IAGS. Their 4-l regular season record was sup- plemented by an exhibition game victory over the Law Review, 24-0. The IAGS finished sec- ond in their league, but were on the short-end of a 7-6 score in the play-offs. To the astonishment of most, including the runners themselves, the Law School cross- country team won the graduate division cham- pionship. Finishing first in a course record time was first-year student Ken Moore. He was responsible for the training program which re- sulted in Ray Bonner finishing 6th, Dave Nau- Cross Country Champions K Moore, R. Bonner, W Pedder M Hyde, D. Naugle. gle 15th, Bill Pedder 20th, and Mike Hyde 22nd. The Law School had six entries in the bas- ketball competition. The two third-year teams, LAW and BLACKACRE have battled over the class championship for three years. LAW won the first year encounter in a non-scheduled game. During the second year the teams met in a regularly scheduled game and BLACKACRE evened the series. This year LAW won the final game of the series to claim the title. The strongest team in the league, WHITE- ACRE, consisted of all second-year students. This team first defeated BLACKACRE, 29-23, then went on to win the league championship with a 6-0 record after whipping LAW, 44-39. WHITEACRE and LAW advanced to the all-school playoffs. Water polo, slow-pitch softball, and volley- ball were the major intramural sports during the spring sports season. Regardless of how the teams played, spirit was boosted when the Law Association pur- chased 20 scarlet jerseys imprinted with LEX in white. This year also marked the appearance of an informal intramural newsletter designed to keep all students informed of the progress of their favorite sports teams. LAW Basketball Team. First Row: W. Pedder, I. Huber, W. Iohnson R. Rittenberg, W. Neukom. Second Row: I. Nelson, C Armstrong, G. Fisher, I. Wallingford, F. Brinkop. BLACKACRE Basketball Team. First Row: K. Groen, R Bon ner, D. Barber, D. Barr. Second Row: S. Parker, R. Trayner D. Goldin, I. Galbraith.