Southwestern College - Moundbuilder Yearbook (Winfield, KS)

Page 21 text:

Psychology Religion 8 Philosophy History Sociology 8 Anthropology Division office Fine Arts Music Art Division office Athletics Football Basketball Track Cross Country Golf Tennis Womean Tennis No division office ATHLETIC BUDGET FOOTBALL Equ1pment 4,806.90 Travel 2,497.60 Officials 880.00 Pre-season, pre-game meals 2,092.50 Laundry 800.00 First aid supplies 1,276.31 Other Scouting e filming parking - poticing - awards e- washers and dryers repairs - assistance 3 629.00 15,416.11 BASKETBALL Equipment 1,144.35 Travet 3,238.00 Officials 1,125.00 Pre-game vacation meals 561.00 Laundry 300.00 First Aid Supplies 843.00 Other: These figures present only a broad and gen- eral picture of the division and athletic budgets. A departmental breakdown of division budgets, as is shown in the athletic budget, would be more realistic in presenting detailed facts and fig- ures of spending for studentst consideration. According to the 1972-73 Southwestern cata- logue, student tuition comprises 562; of the budget, We as students should have knowledge 298.4 32.2 8 $ 85,705 $287.22 $ 51 ,300M $312.80 1 calculated as number of students receiving credit m rtlncludes partial salaries of coaches Scouting, tilming, police parking, awards 1 146.67 TRACK 8,355.67 Cross Country tFaID Travel 330.00 Equipment 300.00 Laundry 204.00 SPRING Travel 1,515.73 Equipment 1 ,83100 Other: assistant coaches - 445 00 entry fees, repair work , 4,628.38 TENNIS Travel 153213988 E ui ment ; q p 906.00 GOLF Travel 470.00 Equipment 387.00 857.00 $30,163.11 of the ways in which our dollars are allocated and spent. Because students have begun to question pri- orities and have identified atledged inequities in budget spending, the College Concerns Commit- tee has begun inquiry into the issue. The com- mittee, as well as Student Council, welcomes responsible feedback and discussion.

Page 20 text:

College Concerns: The Budget in a recent Student Council meeting, some questions were raised concerning budget alloca- tions to the various departments at Southwestern. Upon request, Bill Stephens, athletic director, and Earl Spidel, our business manager and a member of the Budget Committee, presented a breakdown ot the total athletic budget for 1972- 73. The facts and figures they revealed have since generated some student interest and inquiry into the matter of budget-making and spending at 80. , Four members make up the Budget Commit- tee: Dean Barton, Mrs. Schwantes tComptrolleD, Spidel, and Dr. Ruthenberg. At present there are no students or faculty onthe committee, and this tact brought questions trom the members of StuCo. Is it possible for students to work effec- tively together with faculty and administration to determine where our priorities lie? As students of a liberal arts college, should we or should we not expect a steady input of students, whether fresh- men or transfer, from a wide range of interests? May students be enlightened of budget facts, proceed to draw objective conclusions, and finally initiate creditable change, which would better serve students at Southwestern? As a result of lengthy discussions of budget ii Student CounCil ttriggered by a comparison ol the athletic and fine arts budgetst, the matter was forwarded to the College Concerns Commit- tee for research and consideration This commit- tee serves as the ear for student verbalization of DIVISION DEPARTMENT Language English 392 3t Drama Speech Forensics Language Division office Biology Chemistry Math Physics Health 8t P.E. Home Economics Division office Business Economics Education Literature Natural Science 755.5 Social Science STUDENTS questions, gripes, ideas, and suggestions. They have met with the Budget Committee in an effort to voice the responses and reactions of students. The present budget we are operating on was prepared during Orville Strohlls presidency and cannot be changed tor this year. Similarly, according to Spidel, it is unlikely that the budget will undergo any significant Changes in the upcoming year, unless additional funds become available. He added that the possibility of decreasing the budget ot one division in order to increase another is neither feasible or justifiable. Since there are no excess tunds, to increase one area requires a decrease or deletion of another. Budgets are uniquely complicated; ours is no different. The following figures have been extracted from the total 1972-73 budget. In order to accurately and realistically interpret tigures and dollar signs, many things must be consid- ered. The number of students accommodated by or participating in a department, as well as the number of faculty and staff members salaried in a division must be noted when comparing budg- ets between ditterent divisions. The number of students listed represent the number of students Served in Classes in the particular-division. Each student in each class represents a certain unit of cost to the college. These figures show the tota. amount of money allocated to each of the four divisions and varsity athletics, and include faculty salaries and equipment necessary to that divi- sion, COURSE HOURS FACULTY BUDGET PER STUDENT 37.9 10 $110,377 $281.57 44.5 14 $175,804 $232.70 48.5 14 $159,129 $204.01

Page 22 text:

SC Debate Team - Winning Is A Habit By Pete Allegre Top: Slew: Halley, Don McKinney, Marilyn Taylor and Ron Gore. Bottom: Hailey, McKinney and Gore proudly display a few of the many trophies they have won at various tournaments this year. Debate has a special history at Southwestern College. The first intercollegiate debate tour- nament was held on this cam- pus in 1924, and Southwestern is a charter member of Pi Delta Kappa, the national debate fra- ternity. Debate teams from here have a tradition of excel- lence that is being carried on by recent teams. The past five years the SC squad has been rated among the top 20 debate teams from colleges with an enrollment of below 2000 stu- dents. This rating is based on the results of over 480 tourna- ments each year that involve over 630 schools. This year's debate squad has continued the success that Southwestern teams have enjoyed in the past. Debating on the topic, rltResolved: that the federal government should provide a program of compre- hensive medical care for all U.S. citizens, the squad has taken two first place trophies, two third place finishes, a fourth, three speakers, tro- phies, and a coach's award in its first six meets. The tournaments that the squad had attended at this writing were those at Garden City Junior College, Northern Oklahoma State College, the University of Nebraska at Omaha, Northwest Missouri State College, Oklahoma Chris- tian College, and Wichita State University. it was at Omaha that the two first place trophies and the coach's award were won; at Oklahoma Christian three speakers' trophies, as well as a fourth place finish, were won. How does a team stay on top year after year? The answer is simple, according to debate coach Jan Schuetz: ltBy recruiting competent peo- ple? She added that alumni contributions to an ample scholarship fur'fd 'make this task easier. Ms. Schuetz was asked about the role a schoolls reputation plays in the judging of performance. HI really think it does tplay a part; if the judges hate you, they'll give you a loss; if they like you, theylll give you the benefit of the doubt, was her off-hand comment about the subjective aspect of debate-judging. She was also asked about the sauadiadissmltne. HTheV disci-