Sinking Spring High School - Imago Yearbook (Sinking Spring, PA)

Page 17 text:

On January 25. 1914 a little baby boy was born and was later named Paul Sallade. When he was a little baby he no doubt made plenty of noise but somehow or other he seems to have quieted down a bit. He has made quite a name for himself in sports. During his high school career he was an active member of the basketball, baseball, and track teams. He starred for four years in the former two and his flash in track was only recognized in his Senior year when he equaled High School records in the sprint and dashes. Paul has a weakness for brunettes, and we think that's where he gets his inspiration while playing the game. The class as a whole wishes Paul success in whatever field he may enter. PAIL F.. SALLADE Dick, a very ambitious boy. entered our class when we were in 4th grade. Ever since we know him. wc found him to be interested in athletics, especially basketball. Dick starred on the varsity basketball team for the last three years. He has a sunny disposition and a pleasant smile for everyone. This accounts for his popularity especially among the female sex. We do not know whether he has made any definite plans for his future, but we. as his classmates, wish him the best success in whatever course he pursues. RICHARD M. SHIFFTR Born April 29. 1915. • Gene represents the typical high school student, one engaged in some activity or another at all times, and one who is successful on the athletic field and in the classroom. He appears to be of a double nature, for anyone seeing him quietly and studiously poring over his books in the late evening hours would not recognize him as an athelete. Gene is a great student of politics and government. and his opinions are usually well reasoned out. His future educational plans seem to be the pursuit of forestry. We should not be at all surprised to find another • Teddy Roosevelt someday emerging Trom our class, since his interests are almost identical with Roosevelt's. Here is wishing you luck. Gene. We are pulling for you. EUGENE WEIDMAN 9

Page 16 text:

LEROY DEGLER On February 4. 1916 a tiny baby boy who was later named and baptized Leroy Degler. was born at State Hill. He joined this brilliant class in 9th grade and has been a faithful student and hard worker ever since. His profession is architecture, certainly with his courage and diligence. Leroy must become a beacon light to the profession. Although his ambition is to become an architect. Leroy is also an excellent farmer which he learned when but a mere child. We as a class wish him success in whatever vocation he may choose. On the Ides of March. 1914. that eventful day. a bright son ' appeared on the horizon. • Bud.” as he was known to the whole school. Joined us in the fifth grade. He made a hit at once and became extremely popular, especially with the ladies. Although “Bud never tried out for athletic teams, he was a great follower of all sports, being business manager for the boy's basketball and baseball teams during his Junior year. While he admits he never lost sleep over translating Cicero or parsing Latin, he really is a very keen student and is quick to comprehend his subjects. Bud” is a fluent talker when it comes to expressing his opinion and hit1 suggestions are highly regarded by his classmates. “Bud” hasn't decided on his vocation but we have a •hunefc’’ that in 15 to 20 years he will be some chain-store magnate. 1Y1I MAM BUDDY C. MOYER The portrait accompanying this biography is none other than that of Charles D. Ruth.—a pleasing young gentleman, indeed. 'Charley” was born in Sinking Spring on January 8. 1914. He has been very active in all sports and is a fairly brilliant student. In basketball he starred as a guard through which very few forwards were able to penetrate. In baseball he usually holds down short-stop position. From external appearance Charles seems very serious in everything, but what lies deeper one can hardly fathom. He is one of those fellows who likes to take an occasional vacation or a day-off. As to his future. Charles is on the fence, but there is a certainty of some accomplishment in him. CHARLES D. RUTH

Page 18 text:

 What Price, Education?” President Hoover in one of his campaign addresses said. “The progress of the race is upon the marching feet of healthy instructed children.’ and that “if we were to supress our educational system for one generation, the equipment would decay, the most of our people would die of starvation, and intellectually and spiritually we would slip back four thousand years in human progress.” About a year ago. Roger Babson credited the American Public School system with the following results: “During the past twenty years, the public schools have practically eliminated illiteracy and materially raised the general level of Intelligence. They have supervised the health and safety of the nation's children to a much greater extent than ever before and to their great good. They have absorbed the great flood of immigration which inundates the country and kept it American. Through courses in vocational education they have prepared young people for specific trades and have increased the earning power of those educated. Our great advance in material prosperity can be ascribed in part to the higher educational levels and thinking to which the work of the public schools has raised the masses. Such quotations could be multiplied indefinitely, but the important thing is not that the service of the school is valuable, but how valuable is it. What measures of value can be applied to an institution that has practically banished illiteracy, looked after the physical well-being of 28,000.000 children; raised the level of living and thinking; increased the earning power of the worker, thereby creating and building up a home market which consumes ninety percent of the products of the farm and factory; and despite the flood of immigration kept the nation American? He is a brave man. or a fool, who ventures to place a monetary value upon such service. The question is not: Shall we have public education at public expense? That is a settled fact. Our legislative acts, our Constitution provides for that. The questions rather are: How much education and What kind shall we have and how much shall we pay for it? Are we trying to buy too mucn and too many kinds for too many people, and are we paying too much for what we are getting? These are the questions the critics of the school are asking, for it has become the fashion for certain speakers and writers on taxation and public expenditures to point an admonishing finger at the steadily increasing cost of public education, questioning the value of much that has gone to enrich the curriculum, and leading the taxpayer to regard himself as the victim of ruthless exploitation at the hands of the professional educator. But who is it bewails the high cost of education, declaring that we are trying to teach too many people too many things? So often we hear the illogical and irrational statement that the time is at hand when all want to be educated and there is no one left to work. Whose heart is it that yearns with sympathy for the overburdened taxpayer and sees in the reduction oi schools costs the easiest way to his relief? Is it the working man in his small rented home striving to support a large family on a small income and struggling against the approaching day when his older children must give up school and Join the ranks of the wage earners? It is the less numerous middle class worker, owning his modest home, whose children can look forward with a fair degree of assurance to attending the high school for a season? No. not these. They know that in education lies the hope of realizing for their children what circumstances had denied them; that the American public school runs the stralghtesl road to success and a more equal distribution of the world's wealth. Who is it then, that wishes to curtail the school budget and reduce the opportunities accordingly? It is that small but powerful and active class that believe apparently, that education above the line of literacy. is the exclusive right of a few select souls and who claim it for their own by a sort of divine right bestowed upon heredity and wealth, forgetting that they themselves and their prestige are the product of that democracy which they now desire to strangle. It is also the gold-greedy go-getters who have always been willing to rob childhood of its birthright and coin it Into coupons, in order that, with unconscious Irony, they may build monuments to themselves upon the college campuses. These are our “conscientious” objectors to the school budget. But these enemies of universal education were met in the fight for free elementary schools and again for free secondary schools and state universities and were defeated. Once more they are riding to a fall. The American public school is not something fixed, static, unchanging; it is a growth reflecting the prosperity, the changing social, domestic, and economic arrangements of life. More accurately than any other institution it mirrors the national Ideals and aspirations. The traveler in Europe on entering a town sees first of all a great cathedral; in America he secs the schoolhouse. It gathers into Itself an ever larger share of the life of our youth. Now it is reaching out for the adult through the night school, Americanization school, and extension school, offering him a share of Its wealth. When the Constitution was adopted, the average length of school attendance was sixty days; in 1920 it was 120 days, the highest length of school life for a whole population ever attained by any nation. In 1778 the elementary curriculum consisted of the three R’s with the Bible and with spelling added. Fifty years later grammar, geography, and bookkeeping had been added. Another twenty years added history and the use of object lessons. By 1928, one hundred and fifty years after the beginning, the curriculum included not five but twenty-three subjects. When the public school idea was first thought out, the home was