Santa Rosa High School - Echo Yearbook (Santa Rosa, CA)

Page 10 text:

8 THE PORCUPINE ing was between the leaves or written on the margins. What. connection did this have with their investigations? Renard answered this question, after pondering a few seconds, by reaching up in the space behind where the book had been. . Nothing was there except a piece of string. He picked it up, but the end appeared to reach somewhere else. He traced it for a few feet, and found that it led to a volume on industrial arts, stuck in behind the other books. Still the question was “What did this have to do with their in- vestigations?” Probably some freakish notion of the, old man, The bottle they took to a chemist to have its con- tents analyzed; the book Renard took home. The investigations were continued a day or two longer by Renard and his associate, and concluded by interviewing the talkative servants. By the day set for the trial, Renard had his theory worked out and backed by proof based on his investigations. One more. link was. necessary, and to obtain this he visited Dexfen. The answer he received to his query made his chain of evidence complete, i.e., that Jacob Barrett had seen the dog belonging to Dexfen when he was in Paris several months previously. This statement, Dexfen said, could be proven by the butler he had at the time. The following is a summary of the evidence gathered by M. Renard, and produced before the court: 1. Barrett was the only occupant of the house at the time, in addition to the old man and two old servants. 2. Both servants claimed that nothing out of the ordi- nary had taken place in the house on the night of the crime. 3. There was not to be found the least sign of an intru- der having effected an entrance to the house. 4. A book upon industrial arts was found hidden in the library. This book was made up of uncut pages, and only those of the chapter on the use of aniline dyes were cut. 5. This book had arrived by mail addressed to Jacob Barrett, and after his arrival. 4 : : :

Page 9 text:

i 4 4 THE PORCUPINE “Tt was a coach dog,” said the witness, “that in addition to its numerous spots, had two larger ones, one directly behind the other, on the back of his neck.” “Was the dog there when you left Mr. Dexfen’s service?” “T did not see the dog for three weeks before I left. He was kept in the coach house and Mr. Dexfen himself cared for him.” “Could you recognize the dog?” pate “That is all,” said the coroner. The case was given over to the jury, who rendered the verdict of murder, so John Dexfen was held for further in- vestigation. Dexfen gave bail and the case was set for trial a week later. Menwhile Renard was put on the case by the central office, and together with a man from the coroner’s office, he made a thorough investigation of the Jacob Dexfen house and grounds. An officer had been constantly on guard, so that everything was in the exact condition as it was on the night of the crime. They began with the room in which the old man had died, but it was soon evident that all traces had been covered by the doer of the crime. The whole after- noon was spent in going over the first floor of the house. Two things worthy of note were discovered: The first was a small bottle, without label, partly filled with a colorless and odorless liquid, and which was found lying on the floor of the old man’s bedroom; the other was a book found on the library shelves. The library itself was a small room with book shelves running up to the ceiling on two of the four walls, and containing several hundred volumes of old books, covered with dust and smelling strongly of that odor peculiar to old and musty volumes. Evidently neither the room nor the books had been in use for several months or, perhaps, years. What attracted the attention of Henri Renard on these shelves, was a book with rather fresh finger marks in the dust, and which projected a few inches beyond the others. It was a volume of Longfellow’s poems.. Noth-

Page 11 text:

f THE PORCUPINE 6. Barrett knew of the possession of a dog of the afore- said description at the time of his former visit in Paris, several months previously 7, Barrett was the seer heir to Jacob Dexfen’s for- tune. Then the witnesses at the inquest repeated their testi- money, and following came witnesses proving Renard’s in- vestigations. The last witness called was the city chemist, whose testimony was in the form of an affidavit reading: “T Louis Marignan, having duly examined the dog said to have accompanied the murderer of Jacob Dexfen on the night of the crime, and found on the premises of M. John Dexfen find’— -Here everyone in the crowded court room held his breath in expectation, and anyone that noticed Bar- rett, would have seen him turn a shade paler. The reading continued: “That two spots upon said dog’s neck were ap- plied with aniline dyes upon a coal tar base; and further- more, that said spots were made within the last two w eeks.” Immediately the lawyer for the defendant arose: “Would Monsieur Barrett please inform the court upon the connection between the book upon aniline dying and the dyed spots upon the dog’s neck?” he said. Anyone by piecing together this last testimony and that of Renadr, would obtain an outline something of this nature, i.e., That Jacob Barrett had murdered Dexfen, and knowing of the peculiar dog of his cousin, contrived to place the blame on him by having a man testify that the murderer was accompanied by a dog of that description, thus getting him.also out of the way, so that he would obtain the prop- erty of his uncle. But he found that the dog was dead, procuring another of similar size and color, he placed the spots on the neck with dyes. Barrett arose from his seat to answer the question, and steadying himself, opened his lips to speak, but sank back inuttering : “Oh, it’s no use; the game’s up.”