Sacred Heart of Mary Academy - Maricol Yearbook (Bronx, NY)

Page 20 text:

Patricia Nilan, Marie Santopietro, Estelle Leandro, Alice Stewart, Nancy Small, Lucy Bruzzese, Angela Poma, Constance Henehery, Kathleen Doherty, Patricia Palmieri. Josephine Veacler, Pat Madine and Helen Englert are fascinated by the process of osmosis. Exploring the unknown is the work of the scientist. In freshman year exploration begins with general science. Students acquire a gen- eral knowledge of scientific principles and learn that awareness is the key to knowledge. Biol- ogy, the sophomores! dilemma, specializes in the exploration of the process of growth. Here the mysteries of the plant and animal world are unfolded before the student. Niary Flynn and Eileen Kelly demon- strate the difference in weight of an inflated and deflated balloon. Proc aiming l'Ae Hifi of bfe Dreams of a surgeons career are very real for Sophomores When they dissect their first worm. az-a far an e1 '-f ww' s s

Page 19 text:

comes forfA fAe masferpiece, Many hours of practice go into the finished piece of the symphony orchestra. Similarly, the intense work of the Maficol staff goes into the completion of the yearbook, But, as the excel- lence of the final performance rewards the musi' cians, the printed copy rewards the staff. Useful techniques learned at the Catholic Yearbook Conference and the Columbia Yearbook Con' ference were applied to the making of our book. The business staff confers often but the results do not always cause Jane Shine, joan De Torres and Rosemarie Petronio to smile so delightedly. Page Once the pictures are in, the copy writers take over in happx confusion. II Xveafb' after H day of pictures, Peggv O'Leary, Dolores Bohan, and Mary Liston check their lists.

Page 21 text:

Belen Santiago and Vincenzlna Santoro seem proud of their ., biology proaect xx hlch won a red ribbon Tony Grazzi s work' mg model of an early microscope also vxon honors. a f e won ers of fAe universe The Catholic Science Council's annual con- test attracted the interest of many. Participants were required to construct projects significant to the science they were studying. Blue, red or white ribbons, or certificates of merit rewarded many hours of intensive work, research, and sup- plementary study on the part of the contestants. Such activities implimcnt the basic science course and increase interest in that particular branch of science. ane Kennedx s blue ribbon indicated the judges' approxal of her weather indicator. Martha O'Leary demonstrated the effect ot tilt ers on color in the making of a picture Page 13 Vivid and competent the anatomx of a t up won Eleanor Epps a red ribbon