Rogers Hall School - Splinters Yearbook (Lowell, MA)

Page 7 text:

S linters EditOV-ill-CII ief VIRGINIA FOLWELL Literary Board JUDITH ANDERSON ' SUSANNAH QSBORN KIMBERLY FEATHER STEPHANIE STREET DALE NICHOLS CAROLYN WARREN Business Board . A II7lll'lg8V-PATRICIA EIDAM SUSAN BAKER CHERYL MYRICK DEBORAH BOAS KATHLEEN SMALLDON LINDA FARWELL Art cmd Plzotograplzy Editor-PRUDENOE CARTER I I BARBARA BECG ELIZABETH MOMILLAN JUDITH CLOUGH FNIARY TAYLOR ANNE GUMMERE Faculty Advisor Faculty Art Advisor MRS. BANKS WORSHAM NRS. JOHN PERLOEE

Page 9 text:

is-y y'M-f-'T-7f l.Q C , fQ1T ! gK'N f h it ff as :.. if . 5 . F L X l l ,iq , .E ' -x r'1,Q fha- fb .:':,,f.- gr .'g:l:HbS,iZq 3 'aw .ff at :ala Maas . 1- - . ,Q ,. .I ,1 Ny , ., viii QQ L ,J : 1' ,: Cf'-L-. -'N ' QAM 21- - i 4 1 I Roll 'T f' ' 52 -v6Cf'PJ1.l - 5-me . fu- A- f if r-'x J'kxr,V - M -I ,U kg-Agn'-I, . 1 I . 7 'f f 1 ' , . .fx Una - - 1 Jsfsyf .7'Q. '. E Ili' i ' ffl, hffgf .tif 4 A . L igft 'Q - , , lf, 'fj t .f..--.-,z -- ll.: all '1'r'lf' -' I fl- '-, T-A 5 ff , HIFI :fs , J ' ?:- 'Q 1 17 ,jp - , ' ' ' .7-ew an.- Vol. 73 Literary, 1965 No. 1 Editorial You may give them your love, hut not your thoughts. You may house their bodies, but not their souls, for their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, even in your dreams. -C-IBRAN, KAHLIL, The Prophet Today, we young Americans are a concoction of what our parents want us to be, and what the social code expects us to beg only a small ingredient in our makeup is what we want to be ourselves. Though we may, on occasion, seem to rebel against the forces of conformity, we are actually losing the war with the enemy of the present age-pressure. Our small world of the 60's resembles a Iames Bond torture chamber. The walls are closing in: college on the east and west, job opportunities on the north and south, and social acceptance from the ceiling and floor. Parents are unknowingly helping to kick in the walls. Teachers are also aiding the gradual collapse. They all pushg they all exert pressure. CFor our own good, naturally, but nevertheless, pressurej Supposedly, we are the future mainsprings of our country. I-low, then. are we supposed to learn to govern it, to be leaders of a free world, to learn to shape our destiny, to keep ourselves and our nation intact unless we are free to form our own opinions in an atmosphere as relieved of pressure as possible? Instead of being free to function and to leam on our own, we are constantly being molded by our elders, who want to help us on our way. They, in a sense, Want us to be Hawless versions of themselvesg they want us to benefit from their mistakes, and to have everything they did not have. They push us into college because college is necessary for their interpretation of a socially acceptable later life, of a good job, or of a suitable mate. They push us into an early rigid social pattern because they want us to get a head start on the social rat-race we must face in later years. We are constantly warned of the dangers and rough spots of life, yet we are allowed few opportunities to test our abilities to survive them. We have little say in the shaping of our minds or in the directing of our futures. We might want something different from what our parents want for us. We might know that college is wrong, that marriage is wrong. Being pressured into these institutions retards our intellectual and spiritual growth and prevents our gaining knowledge of ourselves.