Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY)

 - Class of 1969

Page 31 of 366

 

Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1969 Edition, Page 31 of 366
Page 31 of 366



Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1969 Edition, Page 30
Previous Page

Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1969 Edition, Page 32
Next Page

Search for Classmates, Friends, and Family in one
of the Largest Collections of Online Yearbooks!



Your membership with e-Yearbook.com provides these benefits:
  • Instant access to millions of yearbook pictures
  • High-resolution, full color images available online
  • Search, browse, read, and print yearbook pages
  • View college, high school, and military yearbooks
  • Browse our digital annual library spanning centuries
  • Support the schools in our program by subscribing
  • Privacy, as we do not track users or sell information

Page 31 text:

considering the number who are al- ways complaining. It did give them the chance to voice their criticisms and problems to the top Administra- tion personnel, and get a direct answer. At the second meeting the students were more radical, really cornering Dr. Ellingson and Dr. Campbell a number of times, but often they were framed into asking some of the questions. TECHMILA: ROTC has now been added to RIT. Do you have any feel- ings about the ROTC program here? EVANS: ROTC was brought to this campus by a vote of the Student Senate. On some campuses the stu- dents are having riots to get rid of their ROTC program, but the stu- dents here decided to have it. There are approximately forty people in the ROTC program now, almost double what they expected. TECHMILA: Student court appears to have died this year. What were its problems? EVANS: The biggest problem was my own negligence. There was so much happening that by the time I realized it was in trouble, it was too late to do anything about it. The members let me down, and in several cases became very emotional, especially the women, and I think they lowered everyone's opinion of how well mature students can judge their peers. When you make a decision and then go and cry about it in Dr. Campbell's office, I think that this is an example of why the Admini- stration thinks it has to make the decisions. CAMPBELL: It has gotten to the point where one must go through three or four different courts before reaching the Student Court. For ex- ample, there is MRHA's court, WRHA's court and the College Union's court. Everybody has a court. So when the Student Court does get a case, it is a kickback from some other organization. EVANS: I think that things will get straightened out eventually. Student Court has two fine people on its staff: Al Ritsko, a very mature and capable person who always follows through, and Jack, who is the new Chairman. These two will restore the Court, and probably improve it great- ly. It failed this year, but I know it won't fail next year. TECHMILA: Do you plan to change the basic organization of the court system on campus? EVANS: No, I don't think there will be any changes; courts are courts no matter where they are. I would like to see more cases sent to student Court in the future. When someone has a gripe—a legitimate complaint —and the court can liberally inter- pret the Student Bill of Rights, the case should go to Student Court. I just want to see more cases, because the more cases you try, the more involved you become and people start to look up to the Court and respect it. We could set some im- portant precedents in several areas if only we could get the cases. TECHMILA: Recently you were granted voting rights on the institute Policy Committee. What does this mean in terms of student involve- ment and power? EVANS: What does it mean for stu- dent power? Well, it is a beginning for the students here at the Institute. The ideal policy making organization for a college or university is one in which there is equal representation of the administration, of the faculty, and of the students. If there are to be thirty people on the committee, it should be split ten, ten and ten, respectively. Right now, here, it is approximately twenty-six to one. But as I said, it is a start and I am very sure that within the next five or six years, the students will have much more representation on the Policy Committee. I think the students won another important victory this year when they finally initiated repre- sentation on the Faculty Council; this organization has the governing power of the entire Institute faculty like the Student Senate has with the students at RIT. The Council makes the important decisions concerning tenure and curriculum. Being on the Council gives students the oppor- tunity to voice opinions about these issues; before, the students did not have a say in curriculum revision, for example. The fact that we have rep- resentation on the council is im- portant in another way: we did it peacefully, unlike Columbia and Berkeley where it took riots to force this change. My hope is that we stu- dents can continue in this direction, becoming more and more equal with the faculty and administration in deciding the future of RIT. h 29

Page 30 text:

ions. The last election of the Men's Residence Hall is ample proof of this, TECHMILA; This year the Student Bill of Rights was passed. Do you feel this bill was necessary for the RIT community? EVANS: Yes. I'll quote the student power movement: . . . on most campuses the students are request- ing in writing what their rights as students are; what they can do and what they cannot. The Student Bill of Rights took almost a year to pass through the Student Policy Commi- tee, which worked with us and with the administration of RIT, and finally produced the Bill. This started in the Student Life Committee and the National Student Association. We took what they had and added to it to make it more specific. The Bill will be distributed to the students next fall, I think, TECHMILA: Does this mean that the human rights of the student have to be reconfirmed within an education- al community like our own? Do you feel the United States Constitution, which grants and governs our rights does not go into enough detail, whereas the Student Bill of Rights does? CAMPBELL: I think so because much of the Bill is concerned with organizational rights and procedures like: who should choose the advisor? It may not be so very different from the federal government's Bril of Rights, except for being more specif- ic, and that is why it was drawn up. It is quite liberal, and I am surprised it passed through the Student Policy Committee and Faculty Council as easily as it did. We've used the Bill three times this year, and it's pretty useful, TECHMILA: What was the Admini- stration's attitude toward the student power movement regarding the change of the winter quarter regis- tration date? EVANS: It was the first major con- frontation and a number of the members of the Administration were very angry about the letter I sent to the students. However, 2,500 stu- dents did sign the petition asking for a change in registration; how could they say no to us? By working with Dr. Campbell, who originally brought the need for a change in the registration date to my attention, and with Dean Welch we were able to obtain enough votes on our side to bring about the change. As far as the petition is concerned, it was not really that important. As Dr. Ell- ingson said to me, anyone will sign a petition. But it did show Jack and myself, and the other people who supported us that we did have the backing of the students. TECHMILA: When Dr. Ellingson said, anyone will sign a petition, what do you think he had in mind? EVANS: He meant that really no one reads a petition when he signs it, so it isn't of much tangible value. CAMPBELL: I think it would be good to note here that more than half of the students signed the petition, which indicated that the campus could be united for one common cause. In some aspects it is danger- ous, but it is something that every- one should be aware of, the Admin- istration included. More than any- thing, though, the petition woke them up. EVANS: It really did wake them up to the fact that the Student Govern- ment had the support of the students, and the respect of the students—something it did not have at the beginning of our administra- tion. TECHMILA: Dr. Ellingson has stressed that the channels of communication at RJT are open. What is your opin- ion about this? EVANS: They aren't as open as they could be, but in comparison with most other universities and colleges, they are very open. The executive “ Decem Jani died this year because of a definite lack of carryover. officers and almost any President of any organization can meet with any member of the Administration with no trouble to discuss problems or present constructive criticism which the Administration is more than happy to listen to. That is what is meant by open channels—they are open for us to work diplomatically and maturely with the Administra- tion to solve the problems that both- er the students. In some cases the problems involve negligence by the Administration, and very seldom do they take it as an attitude of bit- terness because attention was brought to a mistake they had made The only problem we have is with the faculty. They are often less agreeable when we brought our problems to them. TECHMILA: Can you give us a short history of the Meet the Dodge Boys? EVANS: It was Jack's Idea to give the students an opportunity to ask the Administration questions freely, and Ed Coyle supplied the name. At the first meeting approximately 500 people showed up, which isn't many ROTC was brought to this campus by a vote of the Student Senate.

Suggestions in the Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) collection:

Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1966 Edition, Page 1

1966

Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1967 Edition, Page 1

1967

Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1968 Edition, Page 1

1968

Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1970 Edition, Page 1

1970

Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1971 Edition, Page 1

1971

Rochester Institute of Technology - Techmila / Ramikin Yearbook (Rochester, NY) online collection, 1972 Edition, Page 1

1972


Searching for more yearbooks in New York?
Try looking in the e-Yearbook.com online New York yearbook catalog.



1985 Edition online 1970 Edition online 1972 Edition online 1965 Edition online 1983 Edition online 1983 Edition online
FIND FRIENDS AND CLASMATES GENEALOGY ARCHIVE REUNION PLANNING
Are you trying to find old school friends, old classmates, fellow servicemen or shipmates? Do you want to see past girlfriends or boyfriends? Relive homecoming, prom, graduation, and other moments on campus captured in yearbook pictures. Revisit your fraternity or sorority and see familiar places. See members of old school clubs and relive old times. Start your search today! Looking for old family members and relatives? Do you want to find pictures of parents or grandparents when they were in school? Want to find out what hairstyle was popular in the 1920s? E-Yearbook.com has a wealth of genealogy information spanning over a century for many schools with full text search. Use our online Genealogy Resource to uncover history quickly! Are you planning a reunion and need assistance? E-Yearbook.com can help you with scanning and providing access to yearbook images for promotional materials and activities. We can provide you with an electronic version of your yearbook that can assist you with reunion planning. E-Yearbook.com will also publish the yearbook images online for people to share and enjoy.