Princeton Theological Seminary - Yearbook (Princeton, NJ)

Page 22 text:

6 How does combined argumentation differ from simple? Vifhat are diiferent forms of the latter? Which of these will best become the dignity and charity of' the pulpit? ., , . YVhat is the difference between direct and indirect argu- ment ? VVhy is the indirect so often preferred? A What are its different forms ? WVhich of these holds the chief' place? When is contrast a complete argument? YVhat is the form which orators most prefer-and what are some examples from scripture? What is argument by analogy-and how made safe 'F WVhat is the advantage of number and variety? 1 YVhat is the advantage of probability and presumption ? X CM'otives.j What is the end of argumentation? - i Q What is it necessary for us to touch in reaching this end ? What is a motive? . U When only is man not tice in following motives? What homage to truth and goodness does eloquence com- mand in wielding motives? , What are the two classes of motives? What do We distinguish in goodness ? What are the two Forms distinguishable in the sentiment of Goodness ? N Wliy may happiness be used as a motive? With what conditions may it be so used? iVhat is the relative value of hope and fear as motives? May all the passions of our nature be used in motives? How far may self-love-ridicule-sense of the beautiful- and sympathetic affections be used? W at is emotion? W should we aim to excite emotion '? On what conditions should this be done ? What singular affections of the nervous system have been witnessed under preaching of late 'E What diferent revivals of' religion have shown these affec- tions g and what varieties have appeared? What is the proper estimate to be made of these? What is the proper practical conclusion to be drawn? ' ' Uizctioazi. Whatnislunction as a general characteristic of preaching? How is rt attained-nourished-and what kind of style be- comes it ? ' Aazthority. What is authority in preaching ? WVhy should all public discourse have this characteristic? Why is it especially required in a christian preacher? What are counterfeitsfrom which it is readily distinguished ? How is it enjoined in thc Word of God? How is it consistent with erfect liberty? What difference is markecl, between the Protestant and the Papal preacher, in authority ? What change has been introduced for the better, by the loss of authority which the minister's vocation used to possess 9 .

Page 21 text:

. 5. Hozzzily and Itaraplwczsc. W What 1S the expository lecture as distinguished from the sermon il g How does it differ from the paraphrase? ' What is the true analysis which should prevail in it? What 1S the comparative difficulty of its execution? Why has it fallen so much into disuse? W hat are its advantages? Jlklttcr, Cexplicatz'o1z.l Hgow IS the matter related to the subject of discourse? ll 115' may we not always conduct the hearers by the ,Way we have reached the conclusion for ourselves? What IS the mutual relation of explication and proof Z vi hat Cloes explication comprehend? What does proof comprehend? What place should exegesis have in the pulpit? What more than facts does explication involve? How far may narration and description make up a discourse ? How dpoes the orator differ from the historian, in the use of facts. Wihatiare the respective advantages of narration and descrip- 1on . What is an idea? What is the mutual relation of ideas and facts? What is definition? How does it diifer from judgment? How far is definition necessary in discourse? What are the diiferent forms of definition? What are rules for it? What should be taken without dehnition? How may ideas be indirectly defined ? lvhen is definition most perfect? Bvqf ml What is proof-and how does it diifer fiom definition ? What two classes of truths does it comprehend? What are the three different ways of reaching certainty ? Which holds-the Hrst rank, and why? Why should experience and reasoning be added? What are the advantages of proof from scripture? Wliat are rules to direct us in arguing from the scriptures? What is the threefold object of Jroof by experience? What, the comparative value of near and remote facts? What is reasoning 'Z y Why is it not always certainjn handling ideas of religion? How are we to preserve against it the sense of reality? What are other dangers to be guarded against? What are the advantages of sound reasoning? ' What are the rules for it? How is argumentation to be classified? What is the dilference between affirmative and negative ar- ffuments ? Why is affirmative argument more important? Why should negative argument also be used? How should it be conducted? What varieties are to be distinguished in simple argument? Why is the lat-ter unsuitable to the pulpit?

Page 23 text:

. ..1,,J, , ww,-155 fir 7 What disadvantages attend the exercise of authority from these changes? What is the difference between natural boldness and true authority ? What is the first condition of genuine authority Z What advantage over the secular orator has the preacher T in using reason and conscience ? What other conditions are required? What is reprehension in preaching? Why is it delicate and perilous '! Why should it be special in adaptation to the particular flock 2 What are the conditions of successful reprehensionil W hat are rules to be observed in administering Qcensures? How far may irony have a place in the pulpit? How tar may indignation have a place ? DISPOSITIO N. What is disposition in oratorical discourse? YV hy is more order required in discourse than in t-he expe- riences of life to fbrln opinion and conviction ? What is the necessity of order in discourse? How is good order indispensable to instruction, persuasion, beauty, invention, and inspiration ofthe orator? How great is thc fault of neglecting it! How do We explain the want ofit in pzissionate discourses ? In what two points ofvicw are we to consider disposition ? What is the tirst thing in disposition after the proposition is in the mind? , What are the most indispensable parts in the division of any subject? What is the history of' honiiletic division? ' What are the advantages and disadvantages of the verbal division-and when only is it allowable? What is the scholastic method, and what are objections to it? What is the topical-and it-s advantages? What 'stage of division is the most important for the p1'0- per effect of the subject? What stage requires the greatest talent ? What should determine our choice among different plans, which are equally good, in a logical point of view? What are principles of division? What are rules of division ? What are rules for each particular Jart in the division ? How does oratorical division differ lrorn logical ? To what extent is the latter necessary to the former? What is the movement which the speaker should produce ? What is the first law of this inoveinent ? How is it violated? What are the diilerent forms of this movement? Where should we place the solution of doubts, kc. 1 WVhen only can there be nioveinent in a discourse of par- allel parts Z Ezzorclium. What is a proper definition of the exordiuin Z What is ordinarily requisite to success in this part of' dis- course ? ,.