Medina High School - Medinian Yearbook (Medina, OH)

Page 21 text:

THE MEDINIAN Senior Class History By Idabelle Lackey As our school days come to a close, my thoughts drift back to the day when, the Seniors of ’28, started on what seemed to us a long journey. Oh yes! How well I remember, a group of smiling and half puzzled pupils, being ushered into “kindergarten under the guiding hand of “Miss Ella.” The time passed quickly, and one promotion followed another, until we entered 8 A with Miss Wheatley as our faithful and helpful instruc- tress. Our class had the distinction of being the first one in the new High School Building. The following September a group of “Green but not dumb Fresh ' ies” entered the doors of M. H. S. We did not receive any encour- agement from the haughty Seniors, but we kept our heads high, with the idea in mind that soon we too would be — “Seniors. The next year found (all those who had survived the battles of a Freshie) entering as Sophomores. This year was spent in study (?) and various activities. As Juniors, we participated in music, debate and athletics, edited the “Medinian,” and held the Junior and Senior Banquet. The following September found us — “Seniors.” It was with great anticipation that we began our Senior year. We organized our class, choosing the following officers: President — Charles Smith; Vice ' President • — Carrol McClure; Secretary — Ellen Nichols; Treasurer — Idabelle Lackey. We have found time for numerous parties and other Senior func- tions. We also presented a class play, “Daddy Long ' Legs.” At a recent class meeting, we, the Seniors, made the following ar ' rangements for our “Commencement.” Motto: “Deeds not Words”; colors, Orchid and Nile Green; flower, The Red Rose. As the time approaches for us to leave, it is a half glad and sorrowful adieu that we extend to the faculty and lower classmates. Seventeen

Page 20 text:

THE MEDINIAN Fredda Musch “Fritz Chorus ' 25, ' 26, ' 27; Orchestra ' 25, ' 26: Track ' 26, ' 27, ' 28; Hobby — “Dating Kelly.” “ ' Wisdom is better than Rubies. John Greif “ Johnny ” Baseball ' 28; Hobby — “Baseball.” “It is a point of wisdom to be silent when occasion requires.” Stanbery Nichols “ K[ic ” Chorus ' 25, ' 26, ' 27, ' 28; Band ' 27, ' 28; Orches- tra ' 27, ' 28; Debate Club ' 27, ' 28; Vice Presi- dent of Debate Club ' 28: Debate Team ' 27, ' 28; Hobby — “Debating.” “Hie ’s always ready his point to defend, He stic s to his argument right to the end.” Catherine LeDuke Chorus ' 25, ' 27; Hobby — “Whispering.” “Education is only second to nature.’’ Ruth Fuller “Fuller Chorus ' 25, ' 26, ' 27, ' 28; Hobby — “Singing like a nightingale.” None but the brave deserve the fair.” Horace Williams “Horse Basketball ' 27, ' 28; Track ' 28; Hobby — “Going to Lafayette.” “Tou’re so grave, no doubt you’re wise.’’ Fred Snyder “Fritz” Hobby — “Women (?).” One cannot always be a hero, But one can always be a man.” Marguerite Ewing “ Maggie ” Chorus ' 25, ' 26, ' 27, ' 28; Hobby — “Dodge.” “Her voice is gentle, soft and low. An excellent thing in woman.” In Memoriam Robert W. Nettleton July 2, 1927 Sixteen

Page 22 text:

THE MEDINI AN President’s Address By Charles Smith For centuries man has thought and talked about ending war. In the last hun- dred and twenty-five years he has not only talked but acted. In this action the United States has been a leader. During its history the United State s government has resorted to arbitration in a large number of cases with twenty-five different nations, and has negotiated the so-called Bryan treaties with thirty nations. There are three equally important factors in the triangle of world peace. One might be labelled “Arbitration” or outlawry of war and the enthronement of peace- ful, orderly methods of settling disputes; another might be called security — by which is meant a feeling of safety, a feeling of confidence in the goodwill and peaceful in- tentions of neighbor nations; the third might be named limitation of armaments, a phrase which loosely explains itself, though nations differ in interpreting it. Each of the three factors is dependent upon the others. All three must be developed in proportion to complete the triangle. At present war is an institution — well established, respectable, legal. The world is organised for war, not for peace. The right to wage war on behalf of its honor or vital interests is regarded as one of the most sacred privileges and duties of a nation. International law does not question the right. So all pervasive is war as an institu- tion that permanent peace will be an idle dream until the legal status of war is removed and it is branded as a crime under the laws of nations. So the delegat- ing of war is one step toward international peace. This can be and is at present being achieved through general international treaties or by a series of treaties be- tween two or more parties whenevr the nations have the will to do so. The first grave weakness of the outlawry program, however, is found in its undue reliance upon judicial agencies, and its comparative neglect of political action. Agencies, such as the League of Nations and the international Labor office, are just as urgent- ly needed as are judicial bodies, and for a long time to come, will be called upon to deal with the most menacing international controversies. The Supreme Court of the United States could not have functioned effectively without the legislative and executive branches of government. Thus the delegating of war will not necessar- ily insure world peace but is only a step in that direction. The question of disarmament has been continually discussed since the war. In 1921, a five power naval limitation conference was held at Washington at the request of President Flarding. Five years later a similar conference was held at Geneva, to which all European countries sent delegates. Just recently President Coolidge sent invitations for another conference to be held at any convenient place and as soon as possible. The Washington Conference of 1921 was able to do little more than to secure agreements regarding capital ships at the 5-5-3 ratio as regards the United States, Great Britain and Japan, leaving for discussion at Geneva the ratios of France and Italy. It is not something to be acquired in a day but persist- ent effort will gain in the end.