Loyola College - Review Yearbook (Montreal, Quebec Canada)

Page 15 text:

LOYOLA Page 3 COLLEGE REVIEW Upon viewing such a record an observer might wonder how a small college has been so successful against institutions possessing larger numbers of students from which to choose debaters—more than that, possessing debaters already well advanced in law and theology. In other words, what debating technique has Loyola used in consistently defeating some of the best student debaters in the country? Upon listening to the average Loyola speaker, it is generally noted that he is not necessarily a brilliant orator, but that he treats the debate as an argument upon a definite resolution, and not as an elocution contest. Loyola speakers have won most of their victories by carefully analysing the resolution, by pointing out to the judges exactly what had to be proven, and finally by directing every one of their arguments to the one 5 under discussion. In rebuttal, Loyola men have scored time and again by showing how their opponents’ arguments had wandered from the resolution under discussion. Many times, those who have judged Loyola debates—and this is said in no spirit of boastfulness—have commented on the clarity and logic of Loyola's argumentation, as well as on the Loyola man’s ability to seize, in rebuttal, upon the weaknesses his adversaries’ case may have possessed. One would not be far wrong in attr ibuting this quality of logical thinking to the philosophical training so strongly emphasized at Loyola. Ж 7 У Canada—United States It is а common occurrence today, Юг governments, especially in Europe, to proclaim in striking terms their mutual goodwill, seeking, at the same time, an opportunity to slit one another's throats. However, the friendship between Canada and the United States has been built on more solid grounds than a few empty phrases. During the past term, we have had the privilege of observing a concrete example of this international good-will. We are referring, of course, to the debate held here between Boston College and Loyola. This instance may seem somewhat trivial at first glance, but its significance is greater than would appear on the surface. Two American students were invited to Canada to debate, on a public platform, with two Canadians upon a question of Canadian foreign policy. Where else in the world today could we expect to see a like situation? This is but one minor example of the mutual understanding which exists between our two nations. 7 7 т James J. Moyer, S.J. | То із with the deepest regret that we recall the passing of Mr. James J. Moyer, S.J. Coming to Loyola in t he fall of 1936, he became professor of the History of Philosophy, as well as teacher of mathematics in the High School. The deep sense of loss together with the evident sorrow felt by both students and faculty, portray his qualities far more eloquently than any eulogy. Since Mr. Moyer, prior to his death, was moderator of this publication, the staff of the Review was particularly affected by his passing.

Page 14 text:

LOYOLA COLLEGE Page 2 REVIEW been made against this law. It was claimed that British Dd was being assailed, that Fascism was stalking through Quebec, that freedom of speech was being abolished. However, after stripping all the emotion from these utterances, one could sum up the objections as follows. This suppression of Communist propaganda is an unwarranted attack upon the individual's right to free speech. Secondly, the wording of the law leaves the definition of Communism in the hands of the attorney- general. Thirdly, enforcement of this law means depriving the individual of his right to a trial. Fourthly, the act is unconstitutional. Regarding the first objection, we can state categorically that no anarchist can hide under the guise of free speech. Man's right to freedom of speech does not give him the right to advocate treason. The preaching of Communism is directly or indirectly the preaching of popular revolt, as Communism aims at the violent overthrow of the existing democratic government. Thus the ‘‘Padlock Act’’ does not infringe upon true freedom of speech. Concerning the second and third objections it is impossible to be so positive. Before discussing these, however, it is well to remember one enlightening fact. This Act Respecting Communistic Propaganda was passed unanimously by both Houses. English and French, Catholic and Protestant, Government and Opposition, all voted in favour of this law. Now, since a reasonable confidence is to be placed in legally elected representatives, it should be assumed that in refusing to give any definition of Communism other than the name, they considered such a refusal necessary in the light of facts unknown by the public. They are justified in declining to define Communism by the insidious nature of Communistic propaganda. Add to this the Communists’ policy of introducing such Trojan horses as the League for Peace and Democracy, the League against War and Fascism, the Canadian Labour Defense League, and other “роршаг front” organizations, and it is easy to see that Communism is too clastic for denda Whether in practice the failure to define Communism will provide a weapon to be abused we would hesitate to say. However the sweeping condemnations of the Act on this particular ground seem most rash. The third charge against the law is that it deprives the individual of his right toatrial. This is not true. Upon appeal to the courts and on proof of his innocence, the accused may have the closing order revised, suspended, or cancelled. What is more, this process is simpler and less expensive than the issue of a writ. It has been said that the Act is unconstitutional. This accusation we do not attempt to discuss. Suffice it to remark that if such is the case, then the usuall efficient Communist Party has become woefully negligent in not having it repealed. To sum up, this case of the Act Respecting Communistic Propaganda goes to rove that there is often another side of the question, not less justifiable than that 4. Бу the press. Loyola’s Once again the Loyola debating team has captured the Success in Debating championship of the Inter-University Debating League of Canada. This makes Loyola's fifth win in the last six attempts. In eighteen years of competition, Loyola has entered the finals twelve times and six times won the cup.

Page 16 text:

ТОХОГА COLLEGE REVIEW Page 4 Art for Art’s Sake O sickly hour! when once the bursting breast, Fatigued, о ercome with work, lies down to rest, And feels the itching pangs of sorrow rise, Unchecked, to plague a foolish, rude surmise. Its surging passions, wild with rage, unkempt, Now gnaw him to the core: “О vain attempt! Yes, thee I served. To thee I gave my all. Ч furthered thee despite the Master's call.’ Look here, ye students, see this void within. He charmed the Muses and despised his sin. In their arcaded halls he loved to play. No moral code restrained him in his way. Behold him now, estranged at Virtue's gate. Th’ Avenger s task is done:—he finds too late That Knowledge dies beneath Oblivion' s gad, That naught remains but thoughts or well or sad. From V irtue's path бу pride and passion led, Along Ambition! s course he rushed ahead, To pause were death. To ask if it be wise Received in turn two fierce and gleamy eyes. Yet now those days of frenzy long are past, And with them faded all that he held fast. His knell is rung. Не lives but lives in vain. He lost his all,—the dregs of life remain. 0 you who long to come and learn, beware. The arts are arts indeed that man may share. But never must he fall beneath their yoke, —A slave to passion —No.— 'Twas God who spoke: Ч am the Lord thy God! Remember Me.’ Yes come, to learn of Beauty,—oh, to see,— To toil, to cherish Art. Adorn with fame Her courts majestic, but in God's sweet name. The arts are means—no, not an end—to raise Man's heart to thoughts divine. Along life's ways, Full drear, are strewn these priceless gems sublime, Affording him aesthetic joys in time. LAwRENCE Снвві.кү, 40.