Keuka College - Kiondaga Yearbook (Keuka Park, NY)

Page 11 text:

THE COLLEGE RECORD. 9 any indication that the world suffers on this account. Each reads and receives according to his need and according to his experience. Each sees in poetry and in art that which satisfies his particular fancy, and there is no occasion for anxiety be- cause others do not receive the very same message from them. Possibly the plea most needed, in regard to any subject that calls for interpretation, is the plea for open-minded and open- hearted hearing of different views, with no exacting demand for authority. The error into which the educational world has fallen is the tendency to worship authority with pharisaic narrowness as well as with pharisaic devotion. Scholarship should be recognized and the results of intellectual research should be respected. But that which has poetic instinct as the basis of its creation should be allowed explanation in the poetic instinct of each interpreter, and no stress on authority should interfere with one's right to this privilege. There is another understanding of myths that has held its place with a few in all periods of history. It has never been without advocates, although it has often been lost to the general public. It is not regarded with favor by recognized scholars of to-day ; yet justice has not been done to the sub- ject of interpretation unless some attention has been given to it. This way of treating myths has many points in common with the methods previously mentioned ; but it believes, in ad- dition, that myths are an expression of general principles or truths of vital importance to humanity in its varied stages of development. It may be stated that, according to this type of interpreta- tion, the intuitive faculties of the soul must be called into activity as well as the intellectual in determining the portent of mythical literature, Spiritual insight is required as well as mental accuracy. Since it is believed that myths originally had close connection with religious ideas it is needful that in- terpreters should be those whose religious natures are well developed. This interpretation is based on the Law of Correspondence, and is in keeping with the Hermetic principle of philosophy ; As above so below ; as below so above, or in other words : As in the visible world of physical processes so in the invisible

Page 10 text:

8 THE COLLEGE RECORD. Diana, fully as enamoured as he, could not bear to pass him by without a caress, and invariably left her car for a moment, as it touched the mountain peak, to run to him and snatch a a hasty kiss. But, even when asleep, Kndymion watched for her coming and enjoyed the bliss of her presence ; yet a spell seemed to prevent his giving any sign of consciousness. Time passed thus. Diana, who could not bear to think of the youth's beauty being marred by w7ant, toil and exposure, finally caused an eternal sleep to fall upon him, and bore him off to Mt. Latmus, where she concealed him in a cave held sacred to her, and never profaned by human gaze. There each night the goddess paused to gaze enraptured upon his be- loved countenance, and to press a soft kiss upon his uncon- scious lips. Such is the tale of Diana and her lowly sweet- heart, which has inspired poets of all ages. The sum and substance of this myth, according to philolo- gists, may be expressed thus in one sentence : Diana, the goddess of the moon, loves Endymion, the setting sun, and kisses him to sleep on Mt. I,atmus ; this she does each night. The whole is but a vivid, poetic description of the cyclic occurence of the coming of night. Mythology furnishes abundant illustrations of nature myths, equally apt and beautiful. The philological method of interpretation has points in com- mon with the anthropological. It recognizes the Survival of story and custom, and claims that the primitive meaning of a myth became lost to view with the original meaning of a word. It has many points in common with the allegorical method. It considers myths as descriptions of natural phe- nomena. It recognizes the poetic instinct as an important fac- tor in myth-making. It appreciates the artistic, imaginative at of primitive mind. It is doubtless futile to expect that there should arise a method of interpretation of Mythology which would be gener- ally accepted in any given period of history ; perhaps it is inl- and even undesirable that there should be a univer- sally accepted principle of interpretation. There is no gener- ally accepted method of interpreting the Bible. Nor is there

Page 12 text:

10 THE COLLEGE RECORD. world of thought and feeling. It recognizes a two- fold nature in the poetry of myths : the imagery that pictures pro- cesses of natural phenomena and the imagery that sees, in the invisible psychical realm, movements corresponding to and parallel with physical processes. So that myths in addition to being allegories of nature become also allegories of human ex- perience. This method is in harmony with the science of Symbology, and sees that mythical forms are symbols of uni- versal principles. From this the name symbolic method of in- terpretation arises. It regards myths as parables of life; from this the name parabolic method of interpretation is equally appropriate. Thus it is believed that myths were intended to answer, for those who understand them, much the same purpose that alle- gorical and parabolical elements in the Bible are intended to serve for those who accept it as their religious authority ; furthermore, it is seen that they hold in guise much the same principles. Also, they are open to like difficulties of interpre- tation. The purpose of a parable or symbol is three-fold : To pre- serve, to reveal, to conceal ; to present truth in such an attrac- tive form that the form, by its own peculiar attractiveness, is preserved and handed down from generation to generation ; to reveal the truth in proportion to one's ability to understand and appropriate ; to conceal the truth, as by a veil, from those who are not qualified to appreciate and obey it. Thus it is seen that the very nature and purpose of symbolic literature leave it open to difficulties of interpretation and make it improbable that a given rendering would appeal to any except those of the same degree of development and of kindred temperament. Likewise the very nature and purpose of sym- bolic elements explain how the same Law that gave them birth may elose the mouths of interpreters who understand the true meaning. It is in harmony with the Law of its own creation that tli is should be so. The great difficulty to be overcome in interpreting symbolism is the tendency to press into signifi- e tin- details of a narrative ; the story with its accessories is but the garb or form in which a general truth is clothed. If holds himself to the consideration of principles and essen-