Houston Heights High School - Pennant Yearbook (Houston, TX)

Page 130 text:

NJ fi NT Siena vw iff aaa Qj o - 4: -f 'Q V , ,f -- are . .af .: Ja , A aaKa? VENAN4 -T T? S as Q ...- W: ll aillll M l 2' JE Q24 Qi S The Seann E2 3 3' L-Z'-2 Basketball has at last hit its stride and now ranks as a very popular sport at Heights. do EZ ln the season just passed, many new faces were seen in the line-up and many good rg.: games were turned in by these new performers. The year as a whole was the most 35: :- successful the school has yet experienced. With Coach Krichamer as tutor for a second 35 year, the team responded to his teaching quickly, although it was after the first South i ' D, End game that they really began to show a good brand of basketball. This game was :Zi fast from the start, even though the South Enders were more accurate in hitting the 5 53 basketg and when the final whistle blew, there was only a scant five points difference J TQ in the score. The outstanding players were Lamb and Dee, both of whom broke up many South End passes. The final score in this game was I9 to 14, South End. Heights E SQ gained confidence as the season progressed and when they met South End the second .gif time showed that they really should have won both games. South End was on defense og most ofthe time trying to stop those fast coming Bulldogs but only in vain for Q 3 355' Heights was out to win and show Houston it had the best basketball team as well as Q the best football team in the City.The score of 26 to II was conclusive evidence. Captain J Garst and Stewart were the high-lights offensively, while Dee was best on defense. ii ' -Ei - Q5 :.-.- ET? Z -e :rat f - Q9 Q ' 5 if e it LE 5' 'S T TQ e1-af4.4:--aL-::- A. 4 H -: N -lf' 'L' ' 'Lf2:-Q-fgilllwl ru . T' N S1 0 i Egg! Q- T -1 iw :T - -T W 1Ill 'l'l ' 'W '---1-mafflx fkfi5 9'e - , eg lll llfil ll . lm ,.a.aaliuil H1? - 'mfluuuimfr ,til-:i'lfl,

Page 129 text:

.fy ,,I , A , I wk x I, ..', -, Uv , , ' K- 11 1 -'y ' f f 1 x' cViz'nQy, GSQLVZ? Qagbfaim

Page 131 text:

o fs s ,- -qfwwtf' 'fr '?,5'1s , . A , .,,, W.. - 1 ' 'J 'T Y' 5-'-'f' YYJLQIANT-1q26s 1 A mb ' 'DV K5-5 a Z... W of V .. E 5 2 fi I Q S E St. Thomas was the next team to fall before the Bulldog onrushes. Heights scored IQ E while St. Thomas could gather but 18. To Hastings and Lamb goes much credit for this do il victory, as they were always in the thick of Fight. As time rolled on, it brought Heights 5 Q and Austin together twice, and resulted in the only two straight defeats for the team, if: but in the second game, the Bulldogs played under a handicap, as the weather condi- J Q9 tions were more suitable for a summer event. Dee, McCarble and Stewart were always in 1.3 Z-Sis-Q' the thick ofthe fight. The score was 23 to I7 Austin. In the first game Lamb, Hoke, and E Hardcastle were the most consistent players, and did much in keeping the score to 465 'Ni 24 to I6Austin.Then Main Avenue ofSan Antonio was to be met, and on both occasions J G5 was outplayed, the first game ending 36 to 22 and the second 30 to 18. The team played 2 M well together and showed to advantage the system of coaching used by Krichamer. 'LE- S After these games Heights took on the Rice Freshmen and both games were victories, ?Q further marking the improvement of the team under such able coaching. The scores 1 lb were 20 to 8, 16 to 8, while Stewart, Hoke, and Garst were stars. Then the Southern Pacific gb team of the City League was the victim, this game ended with Heights leading by the '-'gf score of 27-I I. These games only served as preliminaries to the real games of the year. Q if Q? E 3 1 -v mf 48 Us V' V '!lllllllllIW'q 1- 11111111uNlI'Y 1111111uliZ1 ll'1111111111 Z- ql' 1' 71 f : i i Se? gg 23? ?'E E' 1, ' ifi+i-' -fr ig- -f-' gi' gh ' 'flL ef 'llll'l l i1t gi11ll1 4 , 1 eelll d lllll illlll ' 11 11 A :: K 1-Ql Y ' l ' ' - I in Ti: 'f - ,lVld'T.