Georgetown University - Ye Domesday Booke Yearbook (Georgetown, DC)

Page 282 text:

?' LQ H 2 'Z E 5 u.: 'X -. :Q 9 Z ra V. Ld I H

Page 281 text:

.. ........... t ,..::.T K..,. .Ea .K.x Wwtusw Q-Nc .k.-. - -:g: Rts swf XX bX NNN xc X Q SX .... k.,.x K N k,k....,.x.X.K ,X,k,k, X Rcc.,,,,,.l::: .N., . ...,. t Xwcc:.5 hiniself clearly and concisely, with true, logical, constructive arguments, it will be rapid, if he cannot, it is apt to be very slow. And there is only one nieans by which he can equip hinlself for the task That means, what some would call the school of hard knowledgeug but we would call it c.1'j1c1'iv11Cv. liy practice, study and diligent application, he can master self control, secure self-poise, and connnand the undivided attention and respect of those who hear him. 'l'oinorrow's leaders of the liar, in their process of evolution from the rough, crude stone, to the finished, polished speakers, are ably trained by Professor Kayanaugh, Instructor of .Xrgun1entation, in his excellent course. The Senior-Post Graduate and the .lunior-Freshman Debating Societies. actively supported by the faculty, have large ineinberships and are worthy cogs in the steady procession of progress. The tive faculty prize debates instill zeal and interest in the student-body, which is evidenced by the caliber of the debates, the large number trying out for the debates, and by the attendance at the debates. Any resume of debating would be totally lacking, were it not to mention the laudable work done by the Carroll Law Club. the llaniilton Law Club, the Gould Law Club, and the various State Law Clubs, all of which have done their bit in the grand nioveinent to keep Georgetown in the front rank in thc forensic world. M.. DEBATI N SWFYXNXWXXQ -1,3-,.-,. -,. 3 ., .. W. , .X ., c... . ws, s - .cs it cc , .X tv.. gif-ss-, ggg t:E'v'cs-ec ', X ', N '- . :is-'Nil

Page 283 text:

1 f ' i f wwf' 1 A -fs i v,, u il 1v',M fa lg i ta i ' 9 ..t....c.,.v.a...f.-:sat-its-4-tvsv.w WNW-mm .t ..,..x....., Styx W ,,,..,..............:...SW Q ASW-..,,xNx MMNNX xQ-- ..,.N E ,x,X Q ..-y-x Xe ....xx. ,.....xk,-, .,,,, M .... rt ,,.x....,... Nwccl? Srninr Eehating Svurivtg President . JEFFERY G. SULLIVAN,,23, Iowa i I'yfC6-Pl'6SI'lfUJlf VEEDER R. DONALIHY, 123, Ohio .S'vvrcfzm'y RVDOLPH F. JOHNSON, '23, lowa l 7i'l'6lltS'1ll'?l' . JOHN S. XVHI'1'E,'g23, Pa. UR class, while not as active in debating as some who have gone f' before us, has nevertheless upheld the traditions of Georgetown, and has contributed its share to the debaters of the L lllVt'l'Slty. When we entered Georgetown as freshmen, we found the greatest array of debaters in the upper classes that has ever been marshaled in Georgetown. Consequently, during our first year, we were not overly active although some of the more daring of our members crossed swords with the older men and came out of the fray covered with glory. Jeffery fi. Sul- livan, Capelle Damrell, 'l'homas l.eavey, XYalter Nilan, were some of the most prominent dcbaters of our lfreshman year. ln the fall of 193i we came hack to school with blood in our eyes, de- termined to avenge past defeats. ln the tirst faculty prize debate we were represented by Jeffery Sullivan, who was elected President of the Junior- Freshman Debating Sociey. lYhen school opened in the fall of 1922, we had a number of seasoned debaters in our ranks, and the Senior 'Debating' Society was organized with a great deal of enthusiasm. Jeffery G. Sullivan was unanimously elected presi- dent of the Senior Society. ln the lirst faculty prize debate we were repre- sented by Jolm li. Victory and John S. XYl1ite. Their appearance was a tribute to the result which may he accomplished hy earnest application and diligent study. Leo Codd and S. C. Gritiitli represented the Society in the second prize debates. Codd, running' true to form. was awarded the decision. Victor illersch and Jeffery Sullivan represented us in the third prize debate and Mersch was the judges choice. F. Richter and Thomas Gardner will represent the Society in the fourth prize debate. The writer sincerely believes that we will have three of the winners of the preliminary prize debates, and also the winner of the Hnal prize debate, which carries with it the honor of being the best debater in a law school of 1,300 men. It is impossible, in this short space, to do honor to all of the men who have been active in debating, nor to do full justice to our leaders: but we may conclude by saying that our class has done its hit, has earned its laurels, and has truly and ably represented and upheld Georgetown. V XXX X NYXXNNNXkNXbN NXsNm mNX X w my wx X Q vw sw'-Qwx gx www X XXX w wsvx X x NW xxsxgmm X SNNX QQ gs wx X S .X . X X yt... . ,J --sc . .- W . t. .. ,M v . . ,., .. . X.. .t X , . .. X ct- . gs ex, SX: NX X X WKSQ 3 X N N X N six SN QR SEX S X Q Eva? ... xv? h Sw' .ei . ,K .SNR Ms XM .Ss .NNN ss.. -. sms X