George Washington University - Cherry Tree Yearbook (Washington, DC)

Text from Pages 1 - 278 of the 1973 volume:

G cor£ c Tk as lii no ton l nivcrs Library ity Special Collections Division DOES NOT CISCULflTr A1QD05 sBBBMBBfirBBfl aiaaflsiflfl ' IBB HIIBIHIHV ' SB r fCl irww ' i • � 4 1973 Cherry Tree 1 n 1973 Cherry Tree Ken Sommer Robin Sherman Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor Richard Tabor Tom Bakos Photography Editor Cartoonist Writers Kent Ashworth, Mark Leemon, Brad Manson, Stuart Oelbaum, Dick Polman. Photographers Marc Bresenhoff, Bruce Cahan, Delma Studios, Jackie Dowd, Larry Fischel, Carol Hodes, David Hyams, Marvin Ickow, Ron Rogers, Joanne Smoler, Gary Stone, Jeff Wice. Staff Vicki Anderson, Bonnie Bazilian, Sue Buckingham, Lucy Domin, Mike Drezin, Carol Goss, Beth Markowitz, Jerry Nadler, Sue Schlobin. Contents Campus Life page 6 Sports page 114 Changing Faces page 136 Politics page 162 Seniors page 190 © Kenneth A. Sommer and editors. All rights reserved. Ken Sommer Robin Sherman •4 Editor’s Note Assembling an entire University yearbook in a matter of a few weeks is an enormous undertaking for anyone, regardless of one’s publishing experience or knowledge of journalism. When the Cherry Tree’s present editorial staff took over in the last weeks of Spring semester 1973, sales were at 60, senior pictures at 20, advertising at $0, and support from the community at an all time low. In this short period, it has been our goal to put together a GW annual of original photography, writing and art, which anyone who had been at GW the past year could appreciate. Moreover, while attempting to do this, we have committed ourselves to staying within the budget approved by President Elliott. By early May, our sales were over 350, senior pictures over 250, advertising over $700, and support from the community more widespread than it has been in over two years. The 1973 Cherry Tree owes its existence to the commitments of several individuals. Robin Sherman, managing editor, has tirelessly devoted himself to this difficult task, as has Photography Editor Dick Tabor. Without these two, there could have been no book. Also to be thanked are Professors Phil Robbins and George Henigan for their support, Irene Cavanagh for acting as business manager, the Hatchet and Hatchet Shop for their generosity, Delma Studios for their last minute help, and our publisher’s representative, Coy Harris, for his patience, understanding, and invaluable assistance. It is difficult to understand how such a situation could have developed to the point where it seemed doubtful there would be a 1973 Cherry Tree. The conditions were a direct result of two things: the past method of the editor-in-chief selecting his or her own successor, and the six-month late publication of the 1972 book which gave an incredibly distorted view of GW life. From Lloyd Elliott on down, a substantial number agree a yearbook or annual can be an important contribution to the GW community. If it accurately and honestly reflects life at GW with all its good and bad points, if it does not actively seek to alienate one or several groups within the community, and if responsible people dedicate themselves to publishing with little or no expense to the University, the support is there to make a yearbook feasible and accepted. It is our hope the 1973 Cherry Tree will pave the way for a new tradition of yearbooks at GW. Dick Tabor Carol Goss WrZ . r ai • •ygC Fil — ftFTtf mPh 8 ftSSO Lj-r Campus Life t 4fT W ' l jj IffiKp 1 - ftc Hn 1 1 wfiJV Vll . ' W 3 � - si Tjl i HMe ; K Si ?! ftr ij ' SJI fjfll li .•i V C.’IJ A . TJ Itt i(i JR 8 by Kent Ashworth “The George Washington University.” Might sound prestigious to flag waving prospective immigrants from Lapland. Is it as good a school as Georgetown? Ask five thousand disgruntled former poli sci majors what they sincerely think. Five Thousand unemployables insist “damn right.” Special M.A. tuition payment plan: eight years indentured service to the Arlington Red Top Cab Co. Sell out high, and Building “C” that award winning monument to gravel, may someday be dedicated with your name tin-plated on its life-giving air ducts. Consider the inspired educational priorities: 1. Pepco Building (Pepco Hall?) 2. Parking Garage (A New Slant) 3. Library (The old one becomes a colony for tropical dwarfs) 4. Fieldhouse (With alumni bathing in the forecourt) 5. Medical School (The Two Tone Stone) 6. $92 per semester hour (Think of the starving children in India...) There are a lot of questions to be asked. With two glaring bare light bulbs like flames below it, a GW professor’s tongue once launched 653 virginal Bic pens. They (the pens) had never been strapped to Leo’s meat sheer or wired to the clanking elevator doors in Thurston Hall. They were untried Bics, proven not by leggy ice skaters, but by twangy Hugh Linus LeBlanc, their shiny clear plastic chewed filmy in the dark secrecy of Lisner Aud. Which really were the gut courses? Did eighty-four hundred dollars just buy license to attend free-beer mixers twice a year, in between Ezra Pound and Kierkegaard? How about all those uniformed radicals and helmeted cops — were they put on by the brainstorming American Civ Department? They tell us, someday, somplace, the idea only WE learned will be needed, and we’ll be able to nonchalantly spew the recorded spiel. It will come verbatim from a paper painstakingly hammered out during our third semester, and we will be vaguely grateful. Saturday night!! Flickering hashpipes in every window create a postcard scene. As in Star Trek, people beam themselves down to the Rathskeller, pausing to freak out someone else’s grandmother for fun on the way. The human-wigged GW computer ends another week of programming and eliminating inhibitions; often, the wrong people change. People dancing seem to clutch at invisible handholds and grasp them fearfully, nervously glancing at their audience. Waitresses bounce through scary clusters of mirrored people and learn their most valuable college lesson. ..how to assuage a wiseass drunk. [Continued on p. 11] Dowd 10 The rat is like a church; trying to find some sense in it all with the other passionate observers, you congregate, wondering if your mutual intensity will pull you through the futile times. But seeing the pulpit and the orthodoxy for what it is, you suddenly aren’t healed by the weekend communions anymore and you stop going. The rat is orthodox. The regular congregation, full of enthusiasm for wailing but opportunistic fifty dollar bands, and sloshing beer, is a damnable clique. The classes at GW aren’t freshman-through-senior, they’re the loners who stick together. The friends who overlap circles and accidentally know eachother. They’re the Medical, Law, Lit, and Art students. The center residents; billiard room gang, music lounge stowaways, 4th floor organizational maniacs, dance and drama troupes. They’re the fraternities, the professors and students able to talk with eachother, the dorm floors, the employed, the athletes, the idealistic, the tired, the radical, the gay, the paradoxical minority — the People’s Union, and the others. GW society doesn’t have a high-to-low class gradation; all are either kingpin or doormat, depending on the observer’s perceptions. But they all know eachother, thanks to the silent bond: stereotyping. Rice Hall, itself a plum in GW’s mediocre fifties architectural fairyland, right-angles more concrete variations on a theme down G Street. Though one can daydream a “campus” here, that view is sharply switched off with a glance toward the streets ribboning the surface of the university. Washington’s here. Thick monoxide. Loud, frenzied rushhour robots which seem to be the real freaks when the stoplights offer them escape, block by block, from D.C. The bars. The bars’ prices. The incomparable family spirit of a ripped concert audience. The 14th street scene providing rehearsed grim frivolity. Black people and white monuments for thought, believing love happens in spring parks, the beautiful oily river. The jet screeches; Georgetown puberty rites; distinctive bums; vehemently scorning or totally favoring the system, the food, the people, the roommate, the intolerable eccentric, the Hatchet, the parking, and, once in a while, the entire high speed movie of an experience. [Continued on p. 12] Sommer 11 Yeah. But there are still a lot of questions to be asked. Did you find yourself in the cortex of your psychology text? Did enough people deepen whatever your faith is? Is GW a shoppers mart where one spends four years selecting an image? Were the non-comformists of our generation (1973) in pressed sport shirts and fraternities? Can you remember when you knew what communism was? Did the 61 percent president and his 61 percent wife ever see you messing around on the ellipse at 2 a.m. ? Oscar Wilde, class of ’77, wrote “Children begin by loving their parents; as they grow older they judge them; sometimes they forgive them.” GW raised a lot of us some, some of us a lot. Will nostalgia sneak into our fashionably cynical hearts? How long will it be before GW takes on more in memories than it ever was in “reality”? Perhaps the Law of Nostalgia is that the past, with its difficulties, becomes more alluring as it recedes. ..because we survived. Tabor Tabor 13 Fischel 14 DEAD NIGHT- MOST DANGEROUS GAME ELVIRA MADIGAN ' PLUS THE FOUR HUNDRED BLOWS Wice Tabor lb Flooding from Hurricane Agnes, June 1972 Tabor 18 Tabor Stone Professor Lilien Hamilton Wice Wice Dean Elmer Louis Kayser Szlenker Tabor Professor Peter Hill Wice 21 Edgar Winter Wice Youngbloods Tabor 22 Crazy Horse Sommer Liz Myer and Friends Sommer Fischel 24 Bjjf Tabor Tabor 25 Professor Paul Parady Wice Activities Coordinator John Perkins Hyams Dowd Hyams Nifty Swifty Fifties Weekend 28 Dowd 29 fefc- Hyams U % w Wice Sommer Bresenhoff a Wice Wlce Sommer Professor Eva Johnson Wlce N Wice Professor John Morgan 33 34 35 Tabor Tabor Tabor «cvv Eft Tabor 37 Hyams Dowd 38 Dowd Vice President Harold Bright Hyams Sommer Engineer’s Ball Tabor Tabor 40 Tabor Tabor Tabor Faculty Senate Bresenhoff Vice President William Smith Cahan Stone Halper 43 Tabor Tabor Tabor 46 Tabor Tabor Tabor Tabor Dean Harry Yeide wice 49 Professor Stephen J. Wayne (before) Dowd Professor Stephen J. Wayne (after) 50 Vila University President Lloyd H. Elliott Hyams Sommer Hyams 53 by Mark Lee man fAr, • v ' T .4 Joseph Parry-Hill “I’m running against Tricky Dick.” the grey-bearded man in rumpled navy dress whites once said. “And I need your help.” The man was Joseph Wolfgang Parrs- Hill, a frequent campus visitor and self-styled “Crusader, Engineer. Civic Leader, Teach- er, Politician, and Advertising Executive.” He died of a heart attack last summer at the age of 58. In recent years Parry-Hill ran for every elected office in the District. He generally ran a Republican write-in campaign, since he never amassed enough signatures on his petitions to place his name on the ballot. However, his campaign cry of RALLY ROUND (Revolutionary Abraham Lincoln Legion of Youth for Rehabilitation, Order. Understanding, and National Deliverance) became a familiar refrain at GW. He came to campus mostly for company, since college students are friendlier than most citizens, and more tolerant, perhaps, of out-of-the-way people. He w as generally a good-natured man with (at least some of the time) an inkling that his political pursuits were not the most ordinary. Parry- Hill ran his campaign pleas in the Hatchet, ads which also appealed for new members in his “co-op” house on Military Road. He wanted to start a kind of counter culture group but his efforts in that direction were spectacularly unsuccessful. During the Moratorium in 1%9 Parry- Hill opened his house to out-of-town Yippies. They repaid his act of charity, he said, by flushing four crates of oranges dow n the house’s toilets, ruining the plumbing. He referred to these people afterward as the “peace mob.” Parry- Hill’s house was not always a “co-op.” Until the mid-l%0’s, he lived there with his wife, w ho later divorced him, and eight children: Jessie, Joe, Jerrv, Janet. Jay, Jean, Jenny, and Jimmy. Parry-Hill more or less supported his family by working as a stationary engineer — he held a first class license — and by various self-employment schemes, most of which were financial disasters. He was. for example, in the salvage business; he would bid on government ships in hopes of dismantling them and selling the scrap. Similar reasoning led him to keep a yard full of junk automobiles. His neighbors hated him for this home business operation and endeavored many times to have the police force remove the wrecked cars. In addition, their frequent complaints about Parry- Hill’s dog, Gertrude, resulted in the invoking of a seldom enforced D.C. law prohibiting dog barking. He appealed and lost his case to the D.C. Court of Appeals on constitutional grounds. Another of Parry- Hill’s commercial efforts, the “AAAA Elevator Construction Company,” was awarded a contract to remodel the basement of the Library of Congress in the late 1950’s. He had hopelessly underbid and despite a liberal (and probably illegal) use of his children’s labor before and after school, he ended up in debt from the project. Parry- Hill worked for a brief period in 1959 for GW Hospital as a stationary engineer. Shortly after taking the job he had a serious motorcycle accident, having driven the w rong way dow n a one-way street in the afternoon rush hour. Leaving the hospital many weeks later, he tried his hand at higher education, studying psychology at D.C. Teacher’s College. 1964 found Parry- Hill in Panama, where he joined the Panamanian Merchant Marine. Details for this period of his life are hazy, but his commission was possibly bought and paid for, a common occurrence in many foreign navies. (In any event, Parry-Hill’s title of Chief originated here). While it is unclear and certainly doubtful that Parry-Hill was the “first American Indian to run for Congress since 1776” as his campaign literature proclaimed, it is probable that he was the “first candidate simultaneously on welfare, medicaid, and food stamps.” The eccentric old gentleman is gone. Gone too is Zeus, Parry- Hill’s confidante and chauffeur, w ho would wander up to the Hatchet offices, looking lost, and inquire in a slow deliberate voice: “Has the Chief been here?” Indeed, he had. 54 Tabor Professor Clarence Mondale Modes Dowd 57 Cahan ft , im % vcn a co.. h . p nm m woo Student Activities Director David Speck Hyams 59 Ickow 60 PROGRAM BOARD PRESENTS 197? JAN. TO APR. MOVIES Martha’s Marathon of Birthday Bargains Hodes Hodes Hodes Hode • i . V - « � •■ - E j� j m u IT;;.-; ' M ' VS wm rm c • -v SVBS t : -SSSs iPl iPP|ra r • %ySr m mMm mmMM m 64 Liz Myer and Friends Tabor 66 Tabor Tabor Tabor Tabor 67 • 1 Professor Ching-Yao Hsieh v I Wice Professor George Henigan Wice 69 Tabor ' 0 Hyams 71 Dance Marathon Ickow Hodes 72 Hodes Tabor 4 Needleman 76 Sommer Wice — Professor Philip Highfill ickow 77 Hyams Sommer Hyams y Hyams 81 Buffalo Bob Sommer 82 DAILYa NEWS NEW YORK ' S PICTURE NEWSPAPER • N � York, N V 1Q017, Thursday, April 1. 1971 t “Nostalgia” is how Buffalo Bob explains his return to the public eye. “Just plain going back to the good o ld days.” The nostalgia has evidently swept every section of the country, and the show is now booked through 1972 at 45 colleges. Buffalo Bob discounted talk that many college students are stoned on marijuana and that they view the kiddie show antics as another way of enhancing their drug euphoria. The collegians simply want to be kids again, he in- sisted. At Georgia Tech, he said, there was an essay contest for students who wanted to win seats in the Peanut Gallery. “I want to sit in the Peanut Gallery because this semester I’ve already been on Bozo and Romper Room,” wrote one nostalgic student THE NATIONAL OBSERVER Buffalo Bob arul a Night o Nostalgia Pandemonium: Balloons and bubble gum distributed for the oc- casion, are popping everywhere; short-haired and long-haired stu- dents, young mothers with their children, are all on their feet. Buf- falo Bob! Then they hush, 1,600 strong, for the inevitable they’ve come to hear. Buffalo Bob obliges. “Say kids,” he booms, “WHAT TIME IS IT?” The answer thunders back, ricocheting off the wills. Eventually he swept off iff prepare for another college, blowing kisses as he went and saying, “Good night, sweet kids. I love you.” BUFFALO BOB SMITH ' S COLLEGE DATE APPEARANCES 1970 1971: 1970 2-14 University of Pennsylvania 4-4 Temple University 4- 19 Villanova 5- 1 Penn State 5-17 American University 10-13 University of Miami 10-31 Fairleigh Dickinson 12-4 University of Colorado 12-5 Claremont College 12-6 University of North Colorado 12-11 Duke University 12-12 Suffolk University 1-6 University of California 1-14 Florida Technological University 1-17 University of Rochester 1- 22 Albany State 2- 3 Brockport University 2-4 Geneseo University 2-13 Queens College 2-18 Georgia Tech 2-19 University of Hartford 2-20 University of Bridgeport 2- 22 University of Rhode Island 3- 4 Tulane University 3-9 University of Connecticut 3-14 George Washington University 3-17 ' FreVerrf iunior ' Cotlege 3-19 Lasell Junior College 3-21 Salem State 3-25 Robert Morris College 3- 27 Kutztown University 4- 18 Harvard 4-19 Hunter 4-21 Alabama University 4-22 Syracuse University 4-23 NYU 4-24 Cortland State 4-27 Ohi University 4-28 University of South Carolina 4- 29 Loyola 5- 5 Towson State 5-7 Nassau Community College 5-14 University of Mass. 5-29 Florida State 83 Bill Monroe Tabor 85 Tabor Professor Howard Merriman Professor Edwin Stevens 87 i Ickow Sommer Tabor 88 Bresenhoff Tabor Sommer 89 X) Tabor Hschel Tabor Dating Game’s Jim Lange Hyams Hyams 93 Szlenker Dowd Tabor Hyam s 95 96 Tabor 9 Professor Sydney James 98 Sommer Professor E. J. B. Lewis Wice Professor Robert Jones Wice 99 JW f i 102 Sommer Sommer Tabor Tabor Tabor Tabor 105 Tabor labor v -mi c v‘ tb l v . i AT; Tabor i , t • ' . r “ - y ' • ' , ps � •: c« Tabor Tabor One Hundred and Fifty-second Year Annual Commencement of The George Washington University O o J The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences The School of Government and Business Administration The School of Engineering and Applied Sc ience The School of Public and International Affairs The School of Education Columbian College of Arts and Sciences Sunday. May 6. 1973 ■ u ici of Columbia Tabor Tabor Tabor We invited the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, the Secretary of Defense accepted, but the Attorney General declined. That may be something of an historical first. But then we should have known better than to invite anyone who can t keep a steady job. President Lloyd H. Elliott Columbian College Commencement May 6, 1973 108 Tabor Roger Schechter Tabor Columbian College Dean Calvin D. Linton Tabor Tabor Tabor no Tabor Professor John Brewer Tabor Professors Wolfgang Krauss, John Latimer, Howard Merriman Tabor Sports Tabor Tabor Tabor 117 118 Smoler 119 Tabor Tabor Tabor Tabor 121 Smoler Tabor Tabor Stone Tabor 123 Tabor Tabor Tabor Tabor Tabor 125 by Stuart Oelbaum The buzzer rang and it was all over. Syracuse had beaten GW 74-72, ending the Colonials’ season and their chance for an NIT bid. As the fans, proud of their team, but nonetheless disappointed, trudged out of Ft. Myer, Pat Tallent paused on the way to the locker room and vented his frustration by kicking a ball. Scoring 19 points and playing a strong floor game, Tallent’s performance had been good, but it could have been better. He had missed a last minute shot which would have tied the game. And that’s the kind of season it was: good, but it could have been better. Two disappointing 11-14 seasons weighed heavily on Coach Carl Slone’s slender 6-4 frame and gave him more gray hairs than a man of 35 deserves. This season, the congenial coach had more ups than downs. He brought GW its best basketball team in 17 years. Yet, his strategy was booed at games, he was occasionally ridiculed in the press, and, in general, he was not accorded the recognition he deserved. One coach the fans liked was Bob Tallent. The reticent Tallent had led GW to its last winning season before this one and was very successful as JV coach. Slone’s other assistant was Tom Schneider. Schneider had been the freshman coach at American and was hired when Don DiJulia left in September. The youthful Schneider’s earnest and tense appearance before games caused unfamiliar fans to misidentify him as a player. Anchoring the team was senior captain Mike Battle. His uncanny style caused fans to remark that the worse he looked going up for a shot the better chance he had of making it. The 6-7 forward scored 16 points a game, but, especially later in the season, failed to provide much needed floor leadership. Battle remained a sentimental favorite of the fans. He left in style, responding to a tremendous ovation by scoring 21 against Syracuse in his final game. The man who did most of the scoring was Tallent, leading the team with an 18.8 average. His specialties were an outside jump shot (he hit eight in a row against Texas A M) and running the fast break. Despite some sophomoric mistakes, Tallent showed tremendous potential. His virtues were lauded in a letter to Sports Illustrated and he made the metro area collegiate first team. Tallent’s play on defense wasn’t bad, but not as good as his backcourt mate Keith Morris. Morris was so [Continued on p. 128 ] 12b Tabor Tabor Tabor 127 tenacious that even some of the best, like Maryland’s John Lucas, couldn’t elude him. When called for a foul, Morris shot up his hand and flashed the ref a sardonic grin which implied, “That call was so bush that if it wasn’t against me I’d laugh.” Hometown crowds would vocalize their outrage with cries of “Bullshit.” Haviland Harper was Morris’ counterpart, good on offense and not much on defense. At times, he moved well to the hoop and excelled on the break. He was called the best player on the court after scoring 25 at Maryland. The 6-6 soph gained consistency as the season progressed and someday he will realize the dream of his most ardent fan: “30 tonight Haviland!” Like Harper, Clyde Burwell showed great promise in an inconsistent year. At times, the 6-11 soph would dominate a game by blocking shots, grabbing rebounds, and scoring underneath. At other times, the skinny Burwell would be pushed around by more aggressive big men. Burwell exhibited a good shooting touch in scoring at 13.1 clip and lead the team in rebounding with a 10.7 average. The fans’ enthusiasm for his awesome potential was seldom reflected in his cool court demeanor. Unfortunately, these five were not backed by a strong performance from the GW bench. Junior Tom Rosepink’s hustling defense earned him ovations, but his scoring merited little applause. Senior Randy Smith was relegated to being Burwell’s back-up and should have been used more at forward. When given some substantial playing time. Smith responded with 15 points and 12 rebounds against Catholic and 18 points and 10 rebounds against Virginia Tech. Sophomore Bob Shanta showed he needed work, experience, and confidence as did Jim McCloskey. After a slow start, Randy Click came around at guard, playing well against Georgetown. [Continued on p. 129 ] Tabor The Buffs youth and inexperience were evident as GW had trouble mastering some easy teams early in the year. But GW faced Maryland, the first tough game, with a 6-1 record. After the tough, well-played loss to the Terps, the Colonials bounced back and captured the Springfield Hall of Fame classic. GW beat Citadel and then lost to American in the finals of the Presidential classic. In the next eight games, the Buff lost by a point at West Virginia and East Carolina, but beat Richmond, American, Navy, Boston U., and Pittsburgh. The brilliant win against American and the rout of Catholic started the chant “N-I-T” bouncing around campus. The cries were all but silenced when the Colonials lost to Temple, Cincinnati, and Virginia Tech in the next three games. GW revived its tournament hopes with wins over West Virginia and Georgetown, but then came the fatal Syracuse game. While the quality of the Buffs play varied, GW’s cheerleaders were consistently excellent. Such routines as “GW Yeah” had the Ft. Myer fans pleading for time-outs so that the cheerleaders could perform. The overall success of the season introduced GW to some of the amenities of athletic prowess. GW got some decent TV coverage and games were broadcast on a commercial radio station. The broadcasts were not of the highest quality, to put it mildly. The ultimate came when Virginia Tech was called West Virginia for five minutes. GW also got more press coverage, but again not without problems. Slone’s over-exuberant praise of Burwell’s ability was mocked, and Pat Tallent, claiming shooters don’t receive sufficient coverage, was quoted as saying he grew a moustache to get more recognition. Fortunately, continued success on the court will give the Buff more opportunities to get accustomed to those amenities in future years. Haviland Harper 129 Tabor Randy Click Mike Battle Tabor Tabor I Tabor Tabor Tabor 131 Tabor Tom Rosepink Tabor Tabor Tabor Pat Tallent 134 Randy Smith Jim McCloskey Bob Shanta Dowd Changing Faces Tabor by Brad Mattson On the seventh floor of Rice Hall, Vice President and Treasurer Charles E. Diehl and his staff have a complete set of diagrams that answer a number of questions about GW’s future. They have maps telling you what buildings are on the GW campus and where they are located; drawings telling you how much floor space is in one particular building and what that building is used for; and drawings outlining what GW will look like after its desired new buildings take shape. Most of the drawings were made for the GW Master Plan, a multimillion dollar project that, if carried through, will result in the total alteration of the campus. It will destroy most of the townhouses and replace them with larger structures that are allegedly more functional and financially feasible. According to the Vice President and Treasurer’s office, the Master Plan will also solve several problems which now face GW. ‘How do we curtail rising tuition costs?’ ‘How can we create a campus in the middle of Washington, D.C.?’ ‘How do we fight the big developers when we don’t even have eminent domain?’ And, ‘what actually are our educational development plans for the future?’ The Joseph Henry Building, a high rise office structure, was built to generate income and offset tuition expenses; the Center was built to provide students with a central building to start molding a campus, then another office building for more income was added along with a badly needed library and a multi-level parking garage. Soon a new activities building will take shape. All of these buildings are needed to solve some of the problems the University had when it conceived the Master Plan. But then someone took a look at what GW was sacrificing to build the new structures and demanded the University step back and look at the campus it was creating. A movement that originated behind the saving of a few townhouses erupted into alternative master plans drawn up by students in the Urban and Regional Planning Department, six months of hearings on the Master Plan by a Faculty Senate subcommittee, several editorials by the Hatchet urging the University to stop and look around at what it was creating and even an unabated lambasting of the plan by the Washington Post architectural critic Wolfe von Eckhart. The student master plan suggested the University build a campus entrance at 21st and Eye Streets and [Continued on p. 140] 139 prevent a wall of office buildings from separating GW from the rest of the city. They also suggested GW close most of its on-campus streets and absolutely save most of the existing townhouses. The Faculty Senate subcommittee studying the problem agreed with those ideas and incorporated them into their resolution. That statement passed unanimously by the Faculty Senate and Charles Diehl gave it tacit approval. Only time will tell whether those steps toward revising the Master Plan had a lasting effect on the administration’s opinion toward development. No fundamental arguments about GW’s master plan or the criticisms of it were resolved by Spring 1973, basically because there wasn’t any money left for construction. Hopefully the new questions that were raised will still be considered in the future. Whether student input and community complaints changes the scope of the Master Plan or not, the real solution lies deep within the GW administration. That is, at GW there is an overt reluctance to let students have a direct role in determining policy. The Master Plan is important because what students are faced with as a campus on a day to day basis is important. But what the Master Plan represents is even [ Continued on p. 142 ] Sommer 141 quiclevs Sommer more significant. Whether GW will continue to take the easy and expedient way out versus a possibly more creative and imaginative direction is the crux behind all of the plans and conflicts. There is no reason for the GW campus to be typical. This school can, if it will, incorporate itself into the city and share the exuberance that being in a major urban center provides. Being frightened or reluctant to have students participate in the designing of their school will be reflected in how the students feel about GW after they leave. The Master Plan is faulty if its only flaw is that not one student had anything to say about whether this townhouse stayed or that one went, or that a new classroom is built before a new office building, or an apartment building, or anthing else. Students will feel a lot better about the Master Plan if they are able to feel that they have as much at stake in this school as anyone. Being presented with a fait accompli will not instill that feeling. Finally, it must be pointed out to all members of the GW community the fundamental reason this school exists is for the education we may receive while we are here. The administration should not exist to oppose the students, although at times it seems to try very hard to fill that role. Students should not give the administration the impression that they don’t care enough to take an interest in things such as the Master Plan, although this is the impression they often give. One of the best lessons of education is argumentation, compromise and reconciliation, all three of which are denied if input is never sought or opinions never given. We need to increase the flow of communication and information. The revision of the Master Plan is a good place to begin. Tabor Tabor Sommer 2!! pnnininlii ' i f VA?44iI3� UMUiii j - • ; . ' HyM PJ ll i UUJLU )■ l X3ZEI” ..mm f i I; ' jJjjjjJJJJJJ Sommer Tabor 145 Tabor _ 5v . ■ r- yZ- T ' i y r _ 147 Fischel Sommer 148 - Tabor Sommer Fischel Sommer Cahan Stone Tabor ' metro , 2 Tabor Tabor 15 ? Tabor Tabor 153 Sommer Sommer Stone 154 Sommer Pi ft JiM- _ r m A • ■ w 1 ■ i f ' � ?Vj! -r- l Vvmi c _ JL _ V, J- Dowd 157 Sommer Tabor Dowd 158 pp 159-61 Sommer .jk, i Senator Hubert H. Humphrey at taping of American Program Bureau TV series, Center Theatre, January 1972 Sommer U 4 by Dick Polman We were the members of a college generation that came to believe its own press clippings. The big media powers like Life and CBS heralded the political “youth movement” as a viable force for change before the Class of 1973 even reached GW. Newsweek and Time and the six o’clock news were proficient in detailing the antiwar campus uprisings, the protests against ROTC, and the opposition to government-sponsored research programs. Woodstock was the ideal expression of the world that was coming. We came to Washington and George Washington University believing we were the political- cultural force for good, but we leave Washington knowing that the essential truth lies elsewhere, and in fragments. The fall of 1969 provided heady moments for many GW freshmen. Many sat on the G Street pavement outside the Selective Service Building, shouting “Peace Now” with sincere fervor, as if the releasing of the words into the October air would metaphysically alter the perceptions and sentiments of the policy makers. Lewis B. Hershey, director of the draft, was evil. Nixon was evil. Fulbright was good. Averill Harriman was good. The demonstrations of 1969-1970 also provided important cultural bonanzas. They gave freshmen the opportunity to dissent in the streets, but they could also run back to the dorm to see the event played back on the screen with Walter Cronkite. It was not simply the act of expressing political dissent that was important; it was also the enjoyment of watching the youth movement advertised coast-to-coast. Dissent politics was more than just airing the views. It was also the uniting factor which joined together students of differing backgrounds, and at differing levels of maturity. The clenched fist emblazoned in red, and printed on the backs of old T-shirts were not simply gestures of political defiance, but also a membership badge shared by thousands of others. To use the slang of the “revolution” (i.e. “to liberate”) was really to convey social solidarity, as well as a sense of political solidarity. Dissent politics provided focus for many students, along with the sincere belief that political change was on the way. How could we lose when we were so sincere? said a Peanuts cartoon. Looking back now, it is easy to agree with one politician’s statement in 1969 that student’s don’t “read [Continued on p. 166 ] Senator Henry M. Jackson Sommer 105 Senator Mike Gravel Sommer to the bottom of the issue, they just read off the top of it.” The source of that charge is former Attorney General John Mitchell, but putting that fact aside, the perception is nevertheless apt. We took comfort in sloganeering, and in allowing our gut feelings — and not articulation — to be communicated. Coming from comfortable middle class families, we could afford to express our “rage” at the injustice carried out by others. But these hindsight realizations do not take away from the palpable sense of purpose that we felt. But the war managed to continue with grinding efficiency, and no amount of semicircle pot parties, and no amount of Crosby, Stills, and Nash music would change that fact. The purity of dissent politics began to crumble when its very ineffectiveness was exposed, along with the realization by many students that, just like “real” people, student leaders manifested multiple motivations, schemes and half-truths within the youth movement. Both the means and the ends were being debated: whether the struggle went beyond the Vietnam war, or whether the struggle should be focused on the Vietnam war; whether the tactic was to act colorfully defiant, and risk alienating ordinary citizens, or whether the tactic should be to involve ordinary citizens, and run the risk of diluting such energetic anger. Mass demonstrations focusing on the war again drew a big crowd in the spring of 1971 , but students were forced to listen to oratory from opportunistic politicians like Vance Hartke of Indiana who stood on the Capitol steps and shouted to the 300,000, “Out Now!” sounding not quite convincing. And the tactic of confrontation was scarcely more effective few weeks later, when MayDay saw the blocking of traffic, and the technique of ending the war by prying open the hoods of commuters’ automobiles. Campus dissent politics was frustrated by knowing the nature of the evil, but being powerless to fight it. Evil holds a very unique position in American society today. Who is to blame? Who takes the responsibility? The fact is that America’s brand of evil is the scientist who comes home from the office, mentions to his wife that the new deadly nerve gas is coming along just fine, and then asks who smashed the fender on the car. Evil is hidden behind the word-obsfucation of government, hidden behind the replacable human cogs in the bureaucratic machine, hidden somewhere in the conflict between morals and profits. Evil is an elusive enemy shifting its [Continued on p. 169 ] 16t Senator George S. McGovern and FCC Commissioner Nicholas Johnson Sommer House Minority Leader Gerald Ford Tabor Dr. Benjamin Spock Stone Former Senator Eugene J. McCarthy Sommer Sommer Senator George S. McGovern Sommer Senator Hubert H. Humphrey Georgia State Legislator Julian Bond shadows, and campus dissent politics could not pin it down and stop it. The political apathy which has spread over the GW campus in the past two years can be attributed not simply to the lack of hoped-for results, but also to the irritating realization that students’ awareness of injustice has not abated. We are no better than the Dayton housewife who has watched Vietnam explode on her Motorola portable for seven long years. Full awareness, but relative powerlessness. We are bombarded by books, magazines, TV, and newspapers all communicating crisis after crisis. We have been taught by our erstwhile liberal arts instructors that rational inquiry is a gift of the intellectual, that the ability to analyze is a prize worth cherishing. Yet we feel powerless to change what we “rationally” perceived as needing change. Thus, the “quieting” of the campus scene, which Time Magazine, in its typical lack of intelligence, advertised last year, does not spring from contentment, or from fulfillment. In the political context, it springs from bland, confused resignation. The resignation led many students to look back toward traditional avenues of political change. Sen. Birch Bayh drew a big crowd here, but the typical sentiment later was that he was “just another politician.” Gary Hart pulled in a huge gathering, but was unimpressive in trying to persuade why George McGovern would win big in 1972. A McGovern teach-in held the month before the election played to a half-empty Ballroom, with the biggest response going to a visiting Cellar Door comedian who cracked a sufficient quota of Nixon jokes. Stone In the spring of 1972, many students tried lobbying Capitol Hill in the wake of the Administration’s bombing of Indochina, and heard an organizer declare “We are the people, and the people are the law in this country!” But students did not confront senators or represent- atives; instead, they parried with legislative aides who treated them not as the vanguard of truth, but as another interest group ranking somewhere lower in importance and power than the local dairy association from back home. Today, the remnants of the GW antiwar thrust occupy The People’s Union, which, along with other political groups on campu s, also stresses the importance of reform on the community level. The Public Interest Research Group, and Women’s Crisis Center also operate on such a concept. But the dissent politics of GW was not totally an exercise in futility, because it served an important socializing-cultural function. The agony lay, however, in realizing the inherent limitations of the movement, in attempting to believe that what we were doing was unique in history. And now that our concerns stem not from trying to change the world with an afternoon of rhetoric, but in trying to find a place for ourselves within the world, perhaps the answer is to try to know ourselves better as individuals. Perhaps it is time to reject the labels and categorizations of others who have helped make us the most studied and judged young generation in American history. Our supposed monolithic power was a myth, and from that myth, each in our particular way, we must fashion our own tomorrow. 169 i - Representative Robert Drinian Hyams Anti-war activist David Harris Stone Senator Birch Bayh Sommer Representative Shirley Chisholm Cahan ■■■■ Cahan Cahan Cahan 171 Senator Birch Bayh Sommer Those who have had a chance for four years and could not produce peace should not be given another chance Richand M.Nixon,October l968 American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees AFL-CIO 1155 1 5th Street. N.W Washington. D C. 30005 175 Taping of “The Advocates,” Center Theatre, October 1972 Sommer mk B B 1 - B 1 % Ul IB ' BB B McGovern Campaign Chairman Lawrence F. O’Brien questioned by attorney Alan Dershowitz Sommer 1 6 Sommer Senator Robert Dole Sommer Sommer oo 30AM H 8SI.NE Wash. DC Jan 20 You Don’t Have To Be Vietnamese A DISEASED RAT, THAT DRAW no nourishment raori :t s VICTIMS, BUT EACRf tS blood,.. - mm lie to you . .. I PM THE PRESIDENT OF j m y ThE )m mm To Smell A Rat. Come Crown King Dick ! Ezmi INfTiERN ft tionul DEWS’ +♦ 4 4 m 1 1 1 1 m i i i , Inauguration Day, January 20, 1973 Hyams 183 Ickow Stone Sommer lcko A Tabor Funeral Procession of President Lyndon B. Johnson, January 24, 1973 Tabor Tabor Cahan Tabor 187 Tabor Tabor Tabor 188 UBISIHMIUMII . . . . . Tabor Cahan Robert Dorman Seniors by Ken Sommer During the past four years, GW has been a superb vantage point for observing, as well as participating in, many of the events we have seen evolve from what was thought to be an awakening of American youth in the late 1960s. Surely, the opportunities those of us have had here in D.C. since 1969 to involve ourselves in the movement we thought would shape the future of our country, will be indelibly cast in our memories, eventually (if not already) to be nostalgically referred to as “the good old days.” Four years is a long time, and most of the days have slipped away as one great blur. There are, however, certain days and events which have become as much a part of GW as Thurston Hall or Marvin Green paint, and they stand out distinctly. The Moratoriums of October and November 1969, when hundreds of thousands of American youths descended upon Washington and specifically GW because of its strategic location (just four blocks from the White House!); TDA, the day after the Chicago Seven verdicts in February 1970, when our campus became a refuge for demonstrators fleeing hundreds of Civil Disturbance Unit police, who rode their cycles on sidewalks, gassed the dorms, and beat our students and faculty; Cambodia and its aftermath, Kent State, providing an impetus for thousands of GW students to protest and force GW to close down; the April 1971 massing of a half million to again protest Nixon’s insane prolonging of the tragedy of Vietnam; MayDay 1971, when the most extreme of the dissenters sought to “Shut Down” the federal government; and, most recently, the Inauguration Day protest against four more years of insensitivity to the dire needs of our nation. And there have been some valuable relationships for most of us with fellow students, with some of the fine faculty members, and with the few sensitive, concerned administrators at GW. Certainly the memories of the rare classes when you didn’t look at your watch once, the occasional good or great entertainment we’ve enjoyed here, and the seemingly endless dope smoking will have a warm place in many of our minds and hearts and throats. Unfortunately, the deepest impression made upon any students by this University is one which is likely to overshadow the many good things we’ve experienced, and that is the GW administration. The administration of this University tops all others when it comes to red tape, bureaucratic fuck-ups, and selfish, unresponsive administrators who take students’ money while telling them to shut up and get educated. This memory, I am afraid, will characterize my future feelings about my dear old alma mater. Within weeks, if not days, after commencement, graduates can expect the deluge of requests from the Alumni and Development Offices to begin, asking for more MONEY. Regardless of what these offices say about their non-financial reasons for keeping in touch with alumni, money is the main objective. The letters will be subtle and tactful at first, but those who are unable to remove their names from the mailing list are likely to be badgered for dough the rest of their lives. [Continued on p. 192] Karen Ens And for what? Ideally, to pay back to the University some of what it has been good enough to share with us. Practically, to pay the handsome salaries of administrators and bureaucrats who, while we lived and worked in this community, continually told us we were only transients, and to take our ideas, our hopes, and our visions and shove them. I will remember an administration which “knew it all” when it came to planning the future of the campus and told those with constructive alternatives to get lost; I will remember an administration which initially refused to allow the taping of major political figures in the Center Theatre because it violated “building use policies” but finally bowed to considerable faculty and student pressure; I will remember an administration which acknowledged its responsibility for the safety and well being of its members but whitewashed any serious investigation into campus security; I will remember an administration which refused to solicit alternative architectural plans for campus buildings (just who in Rice Hall has a relative at Mills, Petticord and Mills?); I will remember an administration which said dorm residents weren’t entitled to clean restrooms when they complained about filthy bathrooms in Mitchell Hall; I will remember an administration which refused to listen when outraged students and faculty protested the dedication of the University Center to the memory of a former GW President, a man purportedly a racist and anti-semite; I will remember an administration which raised tuition for four years while cutting back on all facets of student services; I will remember an administration which built parking garages and office buildings for private businesses while archaic, rat-infested dormitories continued to deteriorate and off campus housing increased in scarcity; 1 will remember an administration which tolerated a $150,000 bookstore deficit and a floundering exlusive, non-student University Club which failed to pay its rent to the Center for months at a time, while student publications came under intense pressure and threats of disassociation with the University if they did not break even; I will remember an administration which selectively failed to observe important religious holidays and suggested absent students “bring notes from their rabbis”; I will remember an administration which housed freshmen men in the YMCA while vacant rooms existed in Thurston Hall; I will remember an administration which [ Continued on p. 194 ] 192 Delnora Dobbins Scott Swirling Stephanie Julian Laurie B. Joseph 193 proposed an exclusive, non-student health club be included in the new activities building, despite the utter failure of the University Club which had proven that a private, restricted club cannot make it on campus; I will remember an administration which allotted an entire floor of the new library building to Sy Alpert, the man who was “offended” by students and faculty protesting at the Von Braun speech, instead of making the space available for students to study and work; I will remember an administration which failed to consult with students before inviting Richard Nixon’s Secretary of Defense to address the 1973 Columbian College commencement. The list continues — outrage after outrage. The administration of this University has clearly demon- strated, for all to see and hear, that it does not wish to be bothered by what the people paying tuition here think. 1 will remember an administration which has always put itself first and the students last. I will remember an administration which occasionally asked for student opinion, but ignored it when it w ' as contrary to the already made up minds in Rice Hall. 1 will remember an administration which claimed it was in touch with students, while the only touch it had was on students’ wallets. 1 will remember an administration which gave lip service to student interest, when the only interest it knew ' about was the kind it got with our money at the Riggs Bank. The George Washington University, because of its independent status, its geographic location, its large diverse student body, and its talented teaching staff, possesses the opportunity to be a genuine influence in directing the course of higher education, university development, and student life in this country. Narrow-mindedness, obstinacy, and insensitivity on the part of the administration have severely limited any positive impact by this University. The Business First — Education and Student Life Last attitude of the University can only result in a further deterioration of the value of attending GW, and an ever decreasing enrollment of freshmen bears this out. Ironically, I will remember my college experience as four very good years. GW and Washington have offered enough for many of us to feel we have not wasted four years of our lives, despite the constant effort of the GW administration to make life difficult. Without the stimulation and excitement of protest and social consciousness of the past four years, however, the future of student life at GW is dim. Larry Dworkin Inga Laren Roger Goldblatt Marcia Kaffee Colin B. Dawson 195 Joanne Harriett Kramer Mark Delman Bruce Blumberg Barbara Schubert Andrea Silver 1 % 197 Kent P. Ashworth 198 Sidney Gitler Eric Rosenkranz Cindy Balkin 199 Ester T. Lavares Bruce “Hud” Ezrine Dr. Sam Munson Stephanie Oken Johnny Ruth Harrison 201 4k A Merrill Mayper 202 Claire Frank Dennis Slochower Sheri Jane Lagin 203 u Colleen Worthington Donahue Anthony J. DiGiovanni Susan E. Raber Daniel C. Wolff 204 Nancy Friedman Judy Weisfeld Paul Shapiro Glenn Reynolds - ‘ ’ 1 ' ' vK . i X Robert A. Martin Eva Krusten Ross Schoenburg Delston Lynda Blackmon Andrew R. Williams Marjorie Ellen Kossoy Hooshang Cohanof Carolyn L. Thompson Cynthia Drucker Stuart Marsh 207 Linda Hill Robert Jay Gaines Stuart Oelbaum 208 i. V: l Nick Danger Charles Shapiro Donna Aaron Roberta Manness Helen O’Hara White Mary Ruth Connolly Jon Goodman Marcy Facher Mark Gelfand 210 Patty Bilus Lee Lazar 211 Rich Hart, Pauline DiNizo, Jeff Kassower, Margie Sullivan, Pam Stewart, Steve Horwitz Watit Tamavimok Sarah Thorndike 212 •• Randi Rosenblum Barbara Trow Chuck Merin Marc Koslow Brad Lewin Steven Feld Steve Silverman vt m CSTUM6 «tu b - 214 Randy Click Michael Goergen Jackie Dowd 1 Sherahe Brown Thomas L. Blair Lois Dublin Bruce Merwin 216 217 K. Alyce Newberg John Michael Tomsky 218 Michael Stein Chris Hill Ken Sommer Mark Nadler Gerardo Ruiz de la Pena Kerry Pistner Barbara Sattler 221 Mary Benson Jane Goldstein John Day David Bradley Pam Stewart Gary I. Wigoda Gina Rabai 223 Kevin O ' Reilly Steven, Laurie, Michael, Willie, Debbie, Phyl Missing: Benjie, Robbie, Bobbie, Cuddles, Sp 224 A Joan, Jason, Margie, Kenny, Judi, Jimmy, Iva, Peter, Barbara, Sally, Arby Newberry y, Race, Casey Jones, Patches, Jessie, Nicholas, Adam. ..and a cast of thousands 225 Linda Cunningham V • • - ‘V - ' W , • «- J— Michael R. Rymond. Jr. r m i r v ; r a fMs ' il Donna Ireland Dale Spindell Roger Leemis Mary Adams mm Deidre Parke Abdolreza Feilipour IT Kate Lynch Julian Gammon III 228 Richard N. Tannenbaum Arlene Stern Jon Vernick K Barbara McNulty John Newman Maarja Krusten Bert Deixler Judy G. Russell Elaine Mahoney 230 Michael Mansh Paul Collins 23 r Carole Gordon Jeff Fischer Vic Cavallo Gene Gail Cohen 232 HS Pauline Klein 233 Merill Kaufman Rich Kagan I Nancy Josephson l J -■ % K . • Debbi Wilen Steven Stoller Nancy Bookbinder 235 Thomas Sterling Colvin. Jr. 236 Michael Culligan Jill E. Nemez Robin Wiener Lynda Youngworth Thecla Fabian Terry Bain Audrey Leviton Robin Sherman 239 Roberta Mary Dean Mark Brown Marc J. Cordes Kathy Ann Gross Linda Stern Berkman Emile J. Brinkman Nicholas A. Balland Louis Atkin 241 Dick Polman Sherri Rose Kate Rose Mark Crane Perri Drazin Mark Tanker Marcy Tanker 243 Constance Casey Barbara Smagley Mark Bradbury Dappert 244 Bill Garrison Mitch Sussman Denise Elena Bolden David G. Ross 24 Paul G. Marshall Sam Shapanka ■ • V � v . r, 1 . - Steven K. Yarnell Susan Reed Dellinger Arnaldo Castro 24 - Joan Bennett Kurt George Rittenburg Charles Szlenker Susan Grafeld Allan Vick Rouben Yedigarian ifL Robert Kahn Bfeiklt Stuart Ettingoff Aileen Rosenthal 249 Karen Bresloff Barbara Ridgely Joey Schapiro 250 Shelly Solomon Richard Greifinger Greenst ™r . jm r jL fj Lindsay McClelland Bonnie P. Bazilian Kathy Taughinbaugh Stephen Watsky Joy Gardner Arthur Wulwick Ellen Pinnes David Leaf 254 o k Jay Mitchell Levy James B. Lampke 255 v : I T interstate COMMERCE COMMISSIC ' T -T— ' ' b I , - V • ' J ’i - • , V . .v • 1 . • L i 1 • 1 J RSL iyy i r ; ‘inn ' •« . . « . ‘ ' 9 i «l ' J v • , . t • v “ Hfc’ y, V ‘ •f W � ' -, 1 1 J r “ ‘ Richard Burnham Bertha Dunlap Jean Greenwood Michael Nathan (right) and Family 25 Elliott Lieberman Jim Jimmerson 259 Mark Hoffman Barbara Blaustein Joe DeRiggi 2b 1 Advertisers km™ BAPTIST STUDENT UNION Mr Howard D Rees 422-7398 7006 West Park Drive Hyatsville. Maryland B NAI B RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION Rabbi Aaron B Seidman 338-4747 H.llel House. 2129 F Street. N W CHRISTIAN SCIENCE ORGANIZATION Mr James A Williamson. Jr 950 25th Street N W 333-0814 Mr and Mrs William CoMms 3031 N Stafford St . Arlington. Virginia EASTERN ORTHODOX CLUB Prof T P Perros 676-6480 Dept, of Chemistry Rev Paul Economides 2 Ritchie Road. Annapolis. Maryland (301) 757 3183 LUTHERAN STUDENT ASSOCIATION Rev Walter B Scarv.e 462-8275 i806 Irving Street. N W 686-2385 Prof H E Ye.de Dept of Religion 6 6 6130 NEWMAN FOUNDATION Rev John S Wintermeyer 676 6855 2210 F Street. N W RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS (Quakers) Prof. David Green 676-6752 Stockton Hall UN I TAR I AN-UNIVERSAL 1ST CLUB Prof W E Schmidt 585-2477 Dept, of Chemistry 676-6719 UNITED CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP Rev Malcolm H Davis, Jr. 2131 G Street. N W. 676-6434 WESLEY FOUNDATION Rev. Ray Clements 820 9152 676-6328 (c o 2106 G Street. N.W.) 6329 Printing • Duplicating • Blue Printing • Mailing SO NEAR TO YOU! 820-20th STREET, N. W. EX-SPEED-ITE SERVICE, INC. for Free Pick Up and Delivery Service Phone 331-9000 Best Wishes to Class of 73 Marrocco ' s Fine Italian Cuisine 3 blocks from campus Compliments of Macke Corporation School and College Division 0.U5. campus club 1 91 2 G Street 1 Block from Campus Fine food of agreeable prices The University Directory GW 73 is the University Directory for the George Washington University community. It contains a complete listing of all students— undergraduate, graduate, law and medicine. In addition, the Campus Office Directory and alphabetical listing of faculty and staff is included, as well as advertising from campus groups and local or national businesses. In the past, businesses and university organizations have found the Directory an excellent medium for reaching the GW community. It is frequently consulted by most students and staff, and has a useful life of at least a year. We hope that you will join last year’s satisfied advertisers-for even lower rates. For Further Information, Write: The Hatchet George Washington University 800 21 st Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 676-7550 The Engineers ' Council Of the School of Engineering and Applied Science Offers its congratulations to all graduating seniors and its best wishes for their future success Welcome Class of 1973 Alumni Delations DC Public Interest Research Croup Compliments of IS WORKING Toy Safety Investigation Dorm Councils of Market Basket Survey Prescription Drug Survey Thurston and Other Projects Calhoun Halls DCPIRG A Chance to Fight Back Georqe WAshiNqTON UNivERsiTy Book Store Books — Books — Books LAW • MEDICINE TEXTS Special Orders — Best Sellers — Paper Backs — Outlines — References — Study Guides OFFICIAL G.W.U. CLASS RINGS Visit Our Hot Press Corner We Imprint Anything on Our Tee Shirts, Sweat Shirts, and Jackets (Quick Service) Note Books — Binders — Pens — Pencils — Class Supplies — Art Supplies New Novelties - L.P. Records and Tapes — Typing Paper and Ribbons Ground Floor, Marvin Center Phone 676-6870 r L HATCHET FROM THE 1972-73 SENIOR STAFF ) Inside Front Cover: Fogg} ' Bottom. IHSO Inside Back Cover: G.IV.C Master Plan. 1970 DOES NOT CIRCULATE