College of William and Mary - Colonial Echo Yearbook (Williamsburg, VA)

Page 25 text:

E E 1

Page 24 text:

.- fi'-fi r '.l 'r thls sri ii E1 ,If . l . . A lf' ' - - 1 Qui , A - , ' -if l freedom vvas the' of the decision, Greenepraised' .ford its honest get the facts and its herent account off' A ,lfl SDfiFlQ .Of ' - if -',' f . t,' -feoutsideithe'College . 'l9 --'-'1 f'- t' 1. Wvfiify v.', 2 namelvl ' Greene. 'ar bl?-JQIS. R.i,ChmQr1.d'...?. eeQpfa,5'Llrere,:tel fne.-.i.ev3yf. lavvyer,.acce-'pted Va 'oneifg A f54,Ghoo,l.1B'eqa,us'e 'l,'-' the a.ffff .ve-ar teaching bosirioriev iffairieaik pieeewhiie' -,Qt. V -'z .fered-.him' by tb3,lVl3IfShS1lil+15i eecendfisemeeter'final j 'Wvthe S'Ch'QQ VC5fd'li3W:.5.t . ,examewve-re.lb,esng 'gaven: f William and 'ivie.ry.-SgP'ublicr- Q-end einee Aireocrt beeeinerlf notice of his appointment, j ievildent'ithat''the7'decis'ion,' hovvever, drevv criticism Z 'Q5Aflf13p.s 'more impor- ' fron'14duiarters','outsiCiS V- lftantiasma 'Question off, fi the Collegei .o'n,lVlay,- V rprijnciple'thanfthe ?ije5ghifr?,f - the Beard OfiViSlfQ.FS4?Cff1..l '-1.i'nQ7f.Cf.i.One pfdfessiiiiiftldef- ing. on a reco,rnm'end.ation.-:'if'.'l-53149 carried - from Pres identf ,Gravelsfg .re5'j,- ji 'If ,i acafdemic Tyearl 42-' fused to confirm-fhisl-:,n6m9.. j5fQln'.i3'eij1erhbef, '- inerien. simeeleenfirhaee --4.-. faculty rnehibergfg3.a.,5i5g,j,q,Q-ggi. tion of appointments .by ',z' I' X,-,ated aflfjgyfs. 'galiggjififgih J the Board WOFWGIW had-. 1' iFI3'VQ G5eG'ne'.d,elive'rE3al'.f'. . A been simplyla fo'rrn'al,i'ty,, ,ttk -SerfeS1Qf'pUI3IiC.IeCfQ'fj6g ff Greene was' in effect, ,.'t' ' off- ief3tiie.t1ce,iiege.roreen-el .r de-hired. i -The faction suggested 'theftopic' Law, brought immediate re- V.'. . Justice.-land Ffa-ci'sm. The -. sponse-a speci,aI,me.etj'-QQQZ1 llectureslfspanning from ' . ing of thejfaculty !.,, endor-15 tvttl . 'o-' l-November, 18 to February Sed 'H Ietrer,vifrirfen,'.iQy 1' tt'tL 11.0. eevered e verse-ry of . the 'FacultygAffa,irs,fCioAm- T fapiee fiiom thedim Crovv mittee b.y a -vote ofL,:12N3g' era of American 'historyf ' 'I45'the letterjread,,'in 1 jr -N -to ,theldrganized E-ar's . f Dart, 'VVS 'deplore' the ide! cerimbqrien 're their re-' , cision -andftlhe','basis,- ' - pression. of free speech which ,it vvas made: vve believe that serious. dam.- age has been done. to the essentialfaims-'ofg ,' Collegei' and We believe Q , - that thoseinvolvedj. j 7 bear aheayy responsibil-. ity 'forfthat,damage.. . , . . The local ch'apter?.'of'the Q American Association' ofgf. U niversity, Professors 3 l 5 - ordered a .thorough -'invese tigation of 'jchefinci-'hh 2 ., dentzwthe 'Lavv' School T -. facultvgadopted on' IVI ay . - 28Va.resolution 'that A reaffirms its' intention l to develop a faculty ' Y composed of the best qualified. individual-s if vvithout improper' inter- ,. vention from any source outside ,the College. 4 ,d Greene himself initiated-h. a -number ofelavvsuitsmx E against those involved in the decision. ' ' Why all the uproar? . Because Greene vvas . denied any appealin the decision, and because it r was suspected that the de-hiringnstemmed large- ly ,from .objections of those is GREENE AFFAIH ' bytilevvwefe, Perhaps' the . f 'V most .in'ti'i'gu'in'g.5talk: ' i- r certainly' the' best at- -1': , . ' . tendledl lvvais the, final ' one, entitledfg- 'f,J.eFioyd X I lG.reene.ivs College of'VVll+f liann- and..lVl,arv:' AfCriti'que ' of the1,Ad'Hoc AALJP. re-. 1 po,fTTAl'1 Object Lesson 7 , in.:su,LgsHlT. f lathe.. 3 Q lecture',,lGreene'concenf, .V . trated his remarksion tvvo T areas: the AAUP report 4 ' andytheimorals of College actions lin 'the affair. ' . - - ' The AAUP reportyre- leased ih fall'1974, cri- ticized the President and therBoard ,of Visitors. for ' denyingi .Greene faces ' demicdue process. and for ignoring' normal' hir- ' ing,-,andldismissal pro-' cedures. The ,Report added that sinee these procedures vvere intended toprotect academfic freedom, the ' w ultimate side-effect of . the decision might be to f'erode , academic freedom at the College: The re- 1. - port, lhcivvever, found no' hard evidence that such A I a stifling of 'academic , I 4 g r l l -vi he found ,it 'essentially A .vveakrbecause 'it avoids-351. dvvhat' ir. eh'eul'a have fliaffhf-tlwie f terminedf' -Greene attackedifligg, pot 92 gc G the report1s.attempt'to A T 1.25-.'OnS' ut .t-f h- d- - ' l . .P-he vvasa jus I y. is ismissa 'ersimleh basis of 'idefecf Q ' Fdiqal' tive Iproceduref' in the . UUSQ,-t9' hirijng' process: he added. A i'You',canAnot justify' inf ' -' lcaqgfnicil justice by finding an ex- cuse for it.- '-A I-i'e,.eiee notrteacrgfli , criticized the'report's ' ,Compare 't F lackfof a cry for cen- ' If sure or attempt at verify - 'geance in his'-case, and ' deplored the emphasis on strong language Without 'f corresponding strong ac- ' tions recommended. . - Greene's main attack, vi vvas on the lack of aca-' N demic freedom and acaq 1. . demic due process at Wil liam and Mary ' the AAUP's yr the subjectsjf because it,-ignored' ther' fact tharboth, accord- ing to Greene, were denied' A to. him. In the..most im- T passioned part of the speech, Greene outlined Q-I ji his academic and legal. background, and asserteclq -' . 'M ff! ffl 5 I' -1 'ga' . '1 '-Ml'-Q5 ,. 'Gtr . if-4:1-xl.: 'f . ..,. 3... . ., ,. SX-Q 'Lf 'C 5 15 H, 515. 31- . ' .Q -eg J, 11-:W a:Ls,:E1 'A N' L'5!1':2.. - 1 if' N., , :,.-mr. ., ' Liz.. -1 -. ,Y . 1 :-- .. if -ttf ' 1'1a:4:1',', 0 , ,QM I - 4-.ilew , -0 .,e. if ' dir 'Ps 4 . i ge tt 4 35 L 1 . S 3 7. . ,,,

Page 26 text:

'USl'I'i h ith 'il'S Bead nequality . . . Title IX... Proposal 1 ... letter was sent to Pres- ident Thomas Graves Women . . . Equal Opportu- accompanying a fgllovv-up filled by History pro- fessor Cam Weiiceni Since the ieggilhniee of hiring a full-time Direc- Aterr Currently, money been budgeted for nity . . . Affirmative study-lof the1'l973 'Fe-port. this report, steps vfigqql year 1gjr5r,1e5gmet Action .... Ever since 'i Ijif the letter dektede Q have been takennby both a positiqjmggn Title IX of the Educa- June 'IO, .1 974, tIvte.gCbm- the scljtool and wermen pro- created. I i't, - - 'I fir tion Amendments of 1972, rn3itgee.etateci.: 5. . 'rite i 5 l I ' At rne tinne, A such vvords have taken fipisQc:ydarfof.sei7yiee, on ' i,,neetiitiee Qregted Lp original rebeiitgubnlry ' on an added significance tlje Qffirfm3iiVei'Q5E5i'tiQIjl iigeeijdiscrifrkiiiiaations gr womdgvyqereififnilfglxfed to members of the Advisery' Gomrfiiifge et the .dfltipli'ed yeaiiili I it l 'imitvvelveleemiiiriittees of, college community. Cdllegqe of 'VWll ia'mi Enid ,i riithose vvoritin profes- the FacuIQSQ'-'6fi1.Al5?S and.''L At that time, an Ad Hoc Mary? has been neither I FSEYSI who weie, hired l Sgcfiemces e,ngfI',fIfnQi1eQee-f- Committee on the Status revvagding nor Lsuccess- E Qmder old guitielmes. 4 yvphvien inQQIxi6dfilih,,seyg,f1- of Women was formed. ful forimost 'rnemperfs of Q Salary increases, i. teen! Colleg'eifeommgiifees'f' Chalred by Carol Sherman thejfleomrjiittee.-egtlgtbrough fiferitexample, are based on .-lworhen are negflgeilhg' of the Women's P.E. one vvellifgtle that iifdrtain percigtage of 'Disappointed to commjiibyges Department, the commit- corryfiiiliftee wdrli Qby .ztitliieyrfprevious Wearis -,wifi a more equiteb.l.eii3mEfii:: tee examined inequalities de1iin'itior1, frustiatihg, 4, salary alonrgriwith- aT f'w Qrier. Q D. g concerning women faculty, thei'fr'Cis.tretions of A5 'V i'i' r ating of tlieijeetiiter- 'J g r ,One of the V ii staff and students at . --- 1, servinggortthis Committee giiiralificatiegngj Z r .requests the College. 'r ,haue exeeeded all rjermal -'Qgnsequentlygieeglilyiyeafityii lG3ornrnitteIeyMa:si,fdE 1,' Qafrgifex- The results of theme? , rieibgctatlgms .,,. r fillllnfeije Eiilt egrdiscreregggjgggfirir r I remanded , study, published in a i A' nallygldfie Qommietege, f eFji's and, rl J ietithe Heailtiliiiigefjiter. twenty-five page booldlei 'H' iiluidlglil dgiscoverebl that gailafries isj'eQi'iipol.lf5dQdg r positigfii on lVlay 1, 1973, showed it hadf broad responsi'-., Since the 1.9'7i3 repemr I Clitlring this ' .If surprising amounts of 3 bil.itiesf.itf'advisee 7 ' eeorne of thQS31rineQeg,itifes fi, -year and discrimination. Its 'fe 'tl'1re:QeSi'dent on pro- lglave been tggecteqaj' r r lwoman. eyes' major criticisms con- ij.. granigg procedureslwamd eeeothers aregfageing rev,i,ey5VedEQe3e,,' The greatest inequity cerning the faculty vvereg rpojieiesliilpertaining toeg,e:,,..'r' by the curreritg Dela'n 6f still ineegstence is no Special efforts jk fafflflffgflile 8C'lIlOl l in VVeI'e l'T'l8dB to seek VVOITISD capdidates for depart- mgisitel openings: there areas relating to minori- l ties, women and, where l appropriate. to clerical l l eelieculty of Arts and Sciences Jack Edwards. a result of the prob- illefms encountered, several i I was-...jo Specific Affii-ma- personnel'-and no povverl the.ew.Q,rg1en professors tiQ5ifQt:tion Officer: -'-- In Sl-f.l'7Uf Q lg-TEveftQtiteEi'fened to file faculty Lg' 'i' Tbmsost members? m i istgiitfegeiiiist the College repreeyefrifed effvthe Committee ljave I iiiifite problems have Oi-igeeubegelQgmmitteeee .5114 ggijrie to .feel thefjjeither I lilggeemifeetified by the end Agrg I -thel Cornrneriviiealth of Virr Qurrent academic snown i .. 93933 not 'tbS1.l'CO eQe Of rgbreg on fwilliam .igriidl Mary is par- the summer of tllgeert merigS'e6,d fticularly'iseriousnegout r f1,97p4iijQVer 8 Veal' S'nCe eleleriee-Hej'fd'me'renee.ef Kr fajifirmatixqe pactiorj' . r 'tjjje tifigiyijigl recommenda- alEti5sfli1SSEiC5OG5 existed j'i'i5i i' Eidiffef Gxpresslins I tibn. i-'CliQjC3Qlle99, 'Wed digpppointrqgiqt. theirfemeiai Dll'bG1Ef3I -'Of Affirma- S-tin g,effectivenessft er tive Action-Wesley' Undeirfqeerurmyl At the thegfisffcigjted in the folloivi 'Q Wilson. Although this is time, however, Some Cor- upllregcirt that the Co,ir'i1- r was a move in the rections were made While mittee 'Qecommends thief direction, it still did F1615 other areas remei,-,ed belidispanded until an 'TTT complywvpvith their virtually stagnant. Action Office'g The -Ai.. ul The initial result is ss2tabl.ilshed' Hind the r Qiriall ef of the Ad Hoc Committee lifigigzitliggffl 35 FQSCHVSU- ' I I CHIl?Sia.fQlf,iE!l?fUH'ti rl?Q 5 report was the establish- dev if DlfQifQf?fMV- VVi'S0'i'jl'.l'?li51illSt ment of an Affirmative lxflliiizgslieffiflalih' 'QUl'V19driml if diViC!Q'if!'ii9i-Qiime i ge -,Q Action Advisory Commit- heir resignation Ito Pres? I withitljitisexiresponsjjgtl-Er ree to eewe as e Hwetch- depftgggavesi-.c'iting a rneedyl ities a's1.lDii,iector of fa me A dog for the college's .toideydte full ettentiqmii GFi5IFi.'CSi3QlQ.jReSSBI'Qlfl.- Vi compliance with Title IX. fo kFTQQ'3lfeSF?'0US'b 't'95 g i C'ted m'E'H!Q.QeQ At me end of the ece- asiieiigprofefssolr.jHer g 'V ciallicpltilstraints as ix demic year 1973-741 e pcisifiliih asg,jcha'irmanevlafs thei'reizea's'on for not -.rggjil 20 WOMEN AND AFFIRIVIATIVE ACTION showifiggifri the Women's P. Dedegrtrigmiant. Here, many of thQQjMZ.omen professors are expected tg Asp.en,deffe,, E. mqfsffqflftheir ing iciaeeeep .- U aniffli'eiAeriingS rEiiei.,: Q Q T . Q spemtgfcpachirtg ff? V ' ...- ' V .,i- arty va geperreieg iegiivieiiitgri- .il sutiltil'.edtivitiesifQS'1'gl f I' 'nl andf. Meirnetrejei. , gl therH.i'n,ra V , sitiemiiief inadptiltiete i steiilnq, Whilgiiglffel I. cdllegegs foray- ff studaelntfteacher ratios is fixed so that they appear overstaffed. While for the men there exists the lVlen's P.E. and with the with