Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery - Dental Columbian Yearbook (New York, NY)

Page 20 text:

ORTHODONTIA ARTHUR C. TOTTEN, D.D.S. Professor of Dentistry The past decade has seen many changes in the field of dentistry and orthodontics. Recogni- tion by the public and State that a severe dento-facial deformity is a handicap to the welfare of the individual has been a strong stimulus to orthodontic education. As a result of State legislative action, the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the Domestic Relations Court Act of the City of New York, and the Education Law were amended on April 16, 1945, and the responsibility for administering the program for services for physically handicapped children in the City of New York was transferred from the Special Term of Children ' s Court to the City Department of Health. The City Department of Health has been interested in a broad program of care for physically handicapped children consisting of the following aspects of care: medical diagnosis and treatment of the total physical needs of the child, hospital care, convalescent care in institutions or foster homes, physical therapy, nursing follow-up, social services, appliances and devices and other services which may be required for the total medical, dental (ortho- dontic), social, emotional, education and vocational needs of a given child. As the program develops, procedures will probably change, categories of physically handicapped persons that can be included may be increased, and the services for which payment may be secured, extended. Through knowledge and research, it is hoped that prevention will assume the largest part of the orthodontic problem. Dr. Arthur C. Totten 16 Harry A. Galton D.D.S. 1 James Jay D.D.S. Evelyn Witol D.M.D. Clifford Whitman D.D.S. Walter Spengeman Richard Gliedman Monroe Gliedman Francis Loughlin A.B., D.D.S. B.S., D.D.S. B.S., D.D.S. D.D.S. • Axel Hanson Julius Tarshis u Edward Teltsch a I Henry Nahoum a d nn.

Page 19 text:

Robert E. Herlands A.B., D.D.S. John J. Lucca A.B., D.D.S. 4 Howard A. Arden B.S., D.D.S. William J. Miller A.B., D.D.S. Max A. Pleasure D.D.S., M.S.P.H. ..£ Louis A. Cohn D.D.S. ft George W. Hindels George Schwendener Ennio L. Uccellani Joseph C. DeLisi Sebastian A. Bruno Edward Kesseler M.D., D.D.S. D.D.S. D.D.S. D.D.S. D.M.D. D.D.S. PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY The Staff of the Prosthetic Division extends its congratulations and sincere good wishes to the class of 1956. You have completed a long and difficult course of undergraduate train- ing. The Faculty regards your graduation as time for taking stock. An evaluation of your training involves a looking back over the very real past and, if we may allow ourselves, a glimpse into the uncettain future. Ultimately, the acid test of our success will be the measure of happiness and satisfaction shared among yourselves, your patients, and your profession. The Prosthetic Division has tried to prepare you for the general practice of dentistry. That effort involves responsibilities and decisions, some of which have been most obvious to you, such as clinic and laboratory guidance, lectures, demonstrations, discussion groups, in othet words, the day-to-day smooth-tunning machinety of dental education. More important, however, is the source of enetgy behind this tangible machinery — a philosophy of dental education. It is this over-all point of view that determines the what, how, and by whom a program of insttuction shall be carried out. Your Prosthetic Division has a philosophy of education and a staff united in its embrace. In its simplest terms it is this: Until no longer required (?) the dental profession must assume the tesponsibility for the repair and displacement of diseased, damaged, or missing masticatory elements. This service must be rendered in such manner as to restore comfott, efficiency, and esthetics and preserve existing structures for as long as possible. A major share of this tesponsibility falls upon that branch of dental ptactice known as Prosthodontia. Dental schools must, therefore, train students to diagnose and treat disturbances of the masticatory mechanism and its parts. Prosthodontia is a biochemical science and art requiring for its successful petformance a broad biologic background combined with an intensive training in digital skills. These two aspects ate both synergistic and symbiotic. This relationship has been overly labored and clouded with such phrases as basic vs. clinical sciences, correlation, and integration. The simple truth is that, as a popular song states, You Can ' t Have One Without The Other. We are convinced that only one standard of Prosthetic Dentistry can be adopted in education and practice — the best that you can do! Accordingly, we have placed a decided and purposeful emphasis on quality. The separation of general from specialty practice is more apparent than real. In the time provided for undergraduate training it is impossible to cover every situation, every appliance, or every contingency. We appreciate this fact and expect your education to continue throughout your professional careers. Except for some phases of cleft-palate rehabilitation and surgical prosthesis, there are few problems in Prosthodontia which will be beyond the scope of Columbia graduates. We are proud of you. We hope that the future will justify and sustain that pride. Dr. Robert E. Herlands John D. Suomi A.B., D.D.S. GILBERT P. SMITH, D.D.S. Professor of Dentistry 15

Page 21 text:

William A. Verlin A.B., D.D.S. Julian Schroff D.D.S. a Bernard Nathanson D.D.S. Ovid Slavin D.D.S. Marc Louis Berg D.D.S. Philip Kutner D.D.S. Janice Schreiber D.D.S. Lawrence Marder George Kiriakopoulos A.B., D.D.S. D.D.S. PEDODONTICS The continuing increase in population creates many new problems which are intimately related to the various aspects of our societal development, as for example, sociologic, economic, educational and health. We are all interested in, and affected by, factors bearing on all these aspects. As educated, professional members of society, we should feel obligated to participate in constructive civic activities in our communities toward improvement in all these categories. As dentists, however, it is to be expected that our main curricular activity is in the category of health, to help solve the problems of maintenance of dental health, for which we have been especially and carefully prepared. It is very interesting that a high proportion of the population increase lies in two age groups: the very young and the old. Certainly the dental needs in these two groups are many and different; your teachers have provided the background of education and training necessary to permit you to render these services. The expanding technical and procedural task imposed by the increasing need for care will be insurmountable, and the need impossible of fulfillment unless, as individuals and as a profession, we place greater emphasis on prevention of oral disease. It is in the rapidly enlarging age group of the very young that preventive measures can be applied most effectively. Several sound, confirmed measures for lowering incidence of dental and oral disease are already known to us; additional means will most certainly be developed. It is hoped that by participating in the development and application of such measures, you will make your contribution to your profession and society. Dr. Solomon N. Rosenstein SOLOMON N. ROSENSTEIN B.S., D.D.S. Professor of Dentistry 17