Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery - Dental Columbian Yearbook (New York, NY)

Page 18 text:

SAMUEL BIRENBACH, D.D.S. Joseph Schroff, 1897-1950 B.S., M.D., D.D.S. Assoc. Prof, of Dentistry Assoc. Prof, of Dentistry Oral Surgery Some phases of the subjects covered bv the Oral Surgery Division may be of merely cultural interest. The greatest por- tion, however, of the subject matter finds practical application in modern dental practice, the measure of application depending upon the proclivities and abilities of the individual graduate. Apparently the subjects covered treat in the main upon the biological phases of dental practice and the core of their content is lodged essentially in the basic and medical sciences. It is not intended to achieve complete instruction and train- ing in this area in an undergraduate curriculum. The com- prising subjects, because of their scientific and other ramifica- tions, constitute a lifetime study. Competence can be attained only through post-graduate study, well guided internships, hos- pital associations, and other available sources. The dental graduate who confines himself to the limitations of his office may be, in a limited way, a very excellent man but will not attain those important qualifications which are the hall-mark of a cultured professional man. Adolph Berger ADOLPH BERGER, D.D.S. William Carr Prof, of Oral Surgery Wm. J. Savoy, B.S., D.D.S. Asst. Clin. Prof, of Dentistry MiM Robert C. Devine. B.S., D.D.S. Inst, in Dentistry Stanley L. Lane, B.S., M.D.. D.D.S Inst, in Oral Surgery Morris Kavelle, Fred Rothenberg, Morris Fierstein, D.D.S. T. M. Bundrant, D.D.S. Boaz Shattan, B.S., D.D.S. D.M.D., D.D.S. Asst. Clin. Prof, of Inst, in Dentistry A.B.. D.D. S. Inst, in Dentistry Inst, tn Dentistry Dentistry Inst, in Dentistry 14

Page 17 text:

Diagnosis and Radiology (continued) z |, ■? - ST - F thM%M G. Minervini. A.B., D.D.S. Cl ' nt. Asst. in Dentistry VV. Halpert, B.S.. D.D.S. C in. .4 sf. in Dentistry r i Evald Lincler Inst. i» RaWioJog; Ida M.Golorab, D.D.S. Clin. Asst. in Dentistry Pei ' iodon to logy A significant contribution to dental education during the past 50 years is the development bv a few dental schools of a better integrated teach- ing program between dentistry and medicine. This has resulted in a broader health service emphasizing preventive measures rather than corrective therapv. It has also become increasing- ly apparent that successful teaching and training in periodontologv are dependent upon, and cor- related with other subjects of instruction per- taining to oral and systemic health. Despite improved curriculum, adequate fun- damental information on periodontolooy is not taught. Further changes will be necessary before graduates will understand the basic principles of therapy and prevention of periodontal diseases. Frank E. Belibe Saul Schluger, D.D.S. Wm. A. Themann. D.D.S. L. Hirschfeld Asst. Clin. Prof, of Asst. Clin. Prof, of A.B., D.D.S. Dentistry Dentistry Inst, in De FRANK E. BEUBE. L.D.S., D.D.S. Assoc. Clin. Prof, of Dentistry Robert Gottsegen. A.B.. DJiv Inst, in Dentistry Ellen Hosioskv, D.M.D., D.H., D.D.S. Asst. in Dentistry 13

Page 19 text:

Periodontics LW1NG C. McBEATH, D.D.S., B.S.. B.M.. M.D. Professor of Dentistry Ol Ck •s S. N. Rosenstein, B.S., D.D.S. Assoc. Prof, of DeMfistry William A. Verlin, A.B.. D.D.S. hist, in Dentistry - - E. S. Luboja. D.D.S. Julian Schroff. Hyman A. Citron, Asst. in Dentistry B.S.. D.D.S. B.S., D.D.S. Clin. Asst. in Dentistry Clin. Asst. in Dentistry Pedodontics has made phenomenal ss during the past fifty years; in deed, it has emerged I rum oblivion to me a fundamental and basic branch ol dentistry. All ol its efforts arc wholly preventive in nature, whether they be directed to the restoration ol diseased tooth structure or to guidance for sys temic or local control ol dental health. rhey arc effective during the stages of development and differentiation of hu- man beings, the formative periods ol life, physical and mental. This pre ventive branch of dentistry should be closely integrated with, but regarded as separate and distinct from, restorative dentistry. Its scope must be broadened continually to make our future dental practitioners more aware of their pro- fessional obligations. Columbia Univer- sity has maintained consistently this perspective, lor which it has been com- mended by observant visitors from all over the world. Ewing C. McBeath Orthodontics ARTHUR C. TOTTEN, D.D.S. Professor of Dentistry The practice of orthodontics as an exclusive specialty had its origin in America at the turn of the twentieth century. During the first quarter of the century, the concept of orthodontics was purely mechanical. It was not until 1924 when Dr. A. Le Roy Johnson presented his Basic Principles of Orthodontics, a biological concept, that the profession started to realize that orthodontics is the art and science which deals with the growth and development of the body as a whole and is based on anthropology, genetics, dietetics, clinical medicine, and most of the basic biological sciences. This opened up a new field of research on the face and cranium. Today, orthodontics is rapidly changing from its old mechanistic concept to the biologic; case analysis is primary, appliance therapy secondary to the whole problem. There are greater achievements ahead and hope of a brighter future. Arthur C. Totten ILrrv A. Gallon, D.D.S. James Jay. D.D.S. Asst. Clin. Prof, of hist, in Dentistry Dentistry Alex Hanson Inst, in Dental Technic 15