High-resolution, full color images available online
Search, browse, read, and print yearbook pages
View college, high school, and military yearbooks
Browse our digital annual library spanning centuries
Support the schools in our program by subscribing
Privacy, as we do not track users or sell information
Page 14 text:
“
LEST WE FORGET BOB OETTING It's been many, many years since Abraham Lincoln first uttered the words of his famous Gettysburg Address, and many, many men have fallen on the field of battle, for the very thing for which he stood. But, I wonder.-I wonder if that thing for which he so nobly dedicated his life still exists-I often wonder! It is coming to my knowledge, more and more each day, that we, the American people, are becoming less and less appreciative of the freedoms of this democracy, for which men gave their lives. It is true, it cannot be contradicted! It is as though we were decaying from within, as did France before her fall. For when the people of any nation fail to live up to the standards set them by their forefathers, to live and appreciate such freedoms as we have, it is then that we wrought our own destruction. With our own hands, we smite our faces. Stop! take notice, you people who call yourselves citizens', of this nation. Stop! and look at what havoc you and your fellow-citizens have wrought upon the efforts of your forefathers. The Minute Men of Lexington and Concord gave their life's blood, that you and I might someday live in a free land, free from oppression. They gave their lives, that you and I might someday have the thing for which they fought-a democracy, where the people rule! To worship as you please, to express yourself according to your belief. That each and every man, woman, and child might have the chance to reveal his inventiveness, to administer his ingenuity and to establish his talent,-it is such things as these for which they gave their lives. And now again, the lives of hun! dreds of thousands of American boys have been sacrificed in the fight for freedom and equality, that this nation, under God, should live forever. We might well remember some of the places where many of the gal- lant men of our nation laid down their lives.-Remember these:--Wake, Guam, Bataan, Corregidor, Midway, the Coral Sea, Guadalcanal, New Georgia, Tarawa, Marshall and Gilbert Islands, Okinawa,-this was the Pacific theater. Then. the beaches of Northern Africa, the Kasserine Pass, and the famous Hill 609, where our men fought over the bodies of dead and the dying, in a sea of blood, and twisted, mangled limbs. Where bod- ies lay half submerged in mud and rock, where men charged and were withered down by machine gun fire, where men fell from exhaustion and died of thirst, hunger, and heat g where the hand you touched was cold and stiff, it was the hand of a comrade who had fallen the day before. Yes, it was in such a Way that countless men gave their lives-and for what, may you ask? Well, for something good and clean, something they believed in-something they knew others had given their lives for,-to secure the rights of man given him by God !--It is for this that they gave their lives. 12
”
Page 13 text:
“
Now we will take up Marx's definition. This was first put into use in Russia. After Lenin's death, two men were prominent. They were Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. Both believed in social democracy so much that they risked their lives in 1917 to assure it. Again we come to a disagreement on the methods to be used. Their ideas conflicted so much that Russia, as large as it is, was not large enough for both of them. One had to go, and Trotsky did. Sweden has her idea of a socialistic democ- racy, Atlee has his, and Mexico has hers. Here we are, worse off than when we started. First, we had two con- cise and different definitions. Now we have over a score of them and each different. Each of the aforementioned believed in their hearts that their form was democracy. Both nations gave their blood to overthrow a tyran- nical ruler, and both gave their blood that their form of democracy might not fall at the hands of a dictator. You may debate each point separately and you can see the good and bad points of each. The main difference is that the United States is big enough for all the Hamiltons, Jeffersons, Jacksons, Lincolns and Roose- velts put together, while Russia is not big enough for just two men who differ. Through political freedom the people may attain social freedom if they so desire. The recent British elections prove this. There is no way open to attain political freedom through social freedom that is without revolution. The fact is that I, or anyone else, may write something for or against political or social freedom as long as we have the latter freedom. Not even Stalin will concede this possible in Russia. The Communists have stated that it would be silly to let me talk in opposition to the gov- ernment. Therefore, I will stick to Webster and the fact that his first definition is always the one to be preferred. DEFINITION GF DEIVIQCIQACV ' ALICE VAVRA Democracy-do you know what it really is? Demos is Greek for peo- ple and ocracy means government. The people's government, regardless of race or creed, should make for the betterment of living. Democracy is the true feeling of brotherhood, the wonderful satis- faction and happiness which comes to those who look out for one another as well as themselves. Democracy is the sincere desire in everyone to help the downtrodden and make life moreclivable for those made unfortunate by physical or mental handicaps. Democracy is the knowledge that justice prevails and no one will be condemned to death or imprisoned without a fair trial by an impartial jury. CContinued on p. 195 11
”
Page 15 text:
“
CONSIDER Tl-IE NEGRCD LOIS WANINGER Out of the reconversion problems of America today, stands the cen- tury-old question of what to do with the Negro. Although there are other minority groups which have caused controversy, nothing has ever been so hotly contested as the Negroes' economic and social status. We were told that we fought World War II to make our earth safe for democracy. The United States is the ideal of all the liberated nations, but wouldn't those countries be surprised if they knew that a partial state of serfdom existed in their beloved America? Even many Americans would be shocked at hearing the word serfdom. But the conditions of the Negro can rightfully be called this. Let us consider them a moment. In the North and Middle West, Negroes live in one section of each city. An example of this is Harlem in New York. Here live more Negroes in a small Manhattan borough than in any Southern city. Sanitation is poor, houses are crowded together with little light, and the worst is that these Negroes have a very small chance of ever leaving this area for a better one. That they are too poor to afford anything better is one reason, and another is that restrictions are placed on districts outside of the so-called colored section. In many Wcities Negroes were mauled for moving into new areas. Not only in securing living quarters do the Negroes find it hard. Employment has been a constant fight. Many white employees refuse to work with Negroes, while employers are slow to hire colored help. The usual jobs open to Negroes are as janitors, laborers, or jobs requiring back-breaking work and little mental effort. On the other hand, the Negro's condition has improved considerably in the past few years. As many as 1,500,000 were employed in war indus- tries. More and more are being taken into the federal civil service. Some are teachers and some are policemen, even in the South. The housing situation for Negroes is slowly becoming solved by the availability of family units built by the Federal Housing Authority. The army prohibited race discrimination at post exchanges, and the navy has broken former tradition by allowing colored boys to become regular sail- ors and, in some cases, officers. But these are only a few improvements. Well, what can we do about it? The first thing to do about it is to improve the Negro socially. Large scale education is one of the big steps toward this aim. Statistics show that in 1920 fifty per cent of the young Negroes were in school. In 1930 the number jumped to sixty per cent. Today the percentage must be about seventy or seventy-five per cent. But this is not high enough, it should be one hundred per cent. This can be attained only if our government provides equalization of educational expenditures which it has not done up to now. 13
Are you trying to find old school friends, old classmates, fellow servicemen or shipmates? Do you want to see past girlfriends or boyfriends? Relive homecoming, prom, graduation, and other moments on campus captured in yearbook pictures. Revisit your fraternity or sorority and see familiar places. See members of old school clubs and relive old times. Start your search today!
Looking for old family members and relatives? Do you want to find pictures of parents or grandparents when they were in school? Want to find out what hairstyle was popular in the 1920s? E-Yearbook.com has a wealth of genealogy information spanning over a century for many schools with full text search. Use our online Genealogy Resource to uncover history quickly!
Are you planning a reunion and need assistance? E-Yearbook.com can help you with scanning and providing access to yearbook images for promotional materials and activities. We can provide you with an electronic version of your yearbook that can assist you with reunion planning. E-Yearbook.com will also publish the yearbook images online for people to share and enjoy.