Central High School - Snips and Cuts Yearbook (Charlotte, NC)

Page 33 text:

rows she counted as nothing in comparison with his inter- ests and the glory that awaited him as heir to the English throne. All her hopes of domestic happiness, all the pleasures she should have enjoyed in this life were sacri- Iiced willingly on the altar of maternal love. The vivac- ity of her spirit not sufficiently tempered with sound judg- ment and the warmth of her heart, which was not at all times under the restraint of discretion, betrayed her both into errors and into crime. While there are many things in her life to be condemned, there is much to be pitied and more to be admired. She was cultured, capable of speaking and writing with equal ease and dignity. In form she was well nigh perfect. The modern Helen- the most beautiful, the weakest, the most attractive and attracted of women. In deep contrast to this picture we find Elizabeth a rather a homely woman, cultured as Mary was, yet vain and untruthful, overfond of dress, and the admiration of her court. Mary was a queen, Elizabeth a ruler, and after all these years we can view them as they were. But our na- ture's seem to wish to draw the veil of forgetfulness over the former's crimes, leaving only to us the beautiful and pathetic in the life of The lovely and unfortunate Mary. Elizabeth is presented to us as EngTand's greatest queen, majestic and powerful, a woman of rarest intellect, but lacking a woman's heart. M. D. R., '12, 29

Page 32 text:

Mary, Queen of Scots, and Elizabeth of Gngland O contrast the lives of two such women as Mary p U and Elizabeth there are of course many things to be considered. First, we should notice the envi- ronment of their childhood, the atmosphere in which they grew, their surroundings from babyhood to womanhood. Mary's childhood was spent at the French Court under the tutelage of the queen of France, whose main instru- ment of policy was the corruption of her children. This was for many years her home and here she imbibed a love for the beautiful in life rather than a knowledge of the serious which she so much needed in later years. Here there was no mother or sister to advise and admonish, to do and say the hundred little things that count for so much in the moulding of every girl's character. Her early engagement and marriage when only a child, to further the interest of Scotland, her later marriage and disap- pointments have a telling effect on her life. From all this Elizabeth was free. All her life she was self-reliant and independent. The earlier part of her life was spent at the castle of Hatfield with her sister Mary, who although a bigoted Catholic, failed to influence her younger sister, and as queen of England we see Elizabeth favoring either Catholics or Protestants as the occasion demands. She was a shrewd politician, knew whom to trust and how far to trust them. The one re- deeming feature of her character was her love for Eng- land. This was her all-absorbing thought. However vain, however selfish, however much she loved Elizabeth, she still loved England more. On the other hand, Mary's interests were all self- centered. She cared little for Scotland and nothing at all for England. Her purpose in life was to humiliate her rival, and to win honors for herself and her son. This child was her idol. Her own disappointments and sor- 28

Page 34 text:

Che Criangular Debate GJ N the twenty-first day of April there happened an MMM event of utmost importance to the Charlotte High School and of great interest to all the high schools of the State. This was the triangular debate between Greensboro, Raleigh and Charlotte. Greensboro sent two debaters to Raleigh, Raleigh sent representatives to Char- lotte, and Charlotte sent speakers to Greensboro. Each home team had the affirmative side and the visiting team the negative, so that representatives of each of the three cities discussed both sides of the question. The query was: Resolved that a tax should belevied on incomes of 33,000, or more. barring constitutional ob- jections. The affirmative side here was upheld by Messrs. Will K. Carr and Irwin Henderson, and their op- ponents were Messrs.Woolcott and Beckwith of Raleigh. The debate was a close one and the judges had a hard task before them in awarding the victory, but when the ballot was cast, it was found that the Raleigh boys had won. We have no cause whatever to be ashamed of our de- feat here, for this is the first time the Charlotte High School has taken part in a debate of this kind, while Raleigh has had experience before. Since we had to lose, we are glad that we lost to two such splendid fellows as Mr. Woolcott and Mr. Beckwith. Messrs. Tracy Huntley and Aubrey Elliott represented us at Greensboro, having the negative side of the ques- tion, of course. The two Greensboro debaters, with whom our boys had to contend, were reputed to have won every debate which they had participated in. Reputation, however, did not protect them and they became the vic- tims of the well aimed shots of Tracey and Aubrey. The result of the contest between Greensboro and Raleigh was in favor of the latter city's team. Thus, it is seen that Charlotte came out even, Raleigh on top, and Greensboro in the hole. The Triangular Debate was a success in every par- 30