Amador County High School - Skip Yearbook (Sutter Creek, CA)

Page 19 text:

Miss Marguerite McFarlane Mr. J. A. Bryson, Principal Mrs. Mary Gray Shaw Mr. M. L. Landrum Mr. J. T. Peterson Mr. D. R. Marlin Miss Lois Poindexter Miss Lauretta McKay lE1evenQI

Page 18 text:

,,, X- --Ay,,,,min,,mm1gg5g55,,,, mfg -Wiiorx ,7--f--wmp imma fggggfgggafazzsccesiw,,f5s6i555sz,,1.r Q-va-- Z5,,5gfff1f11f - 111111U,,,,U v, -xg UZ , 15536656 NX .K N - Aqrgtsij, -zfzffffssffgf ,,, ,sf ,,m,m,,,,1,,, ,,,,i,,,1g x ,mu , Y ,, , ,EX , ,, -- -'-f 'D k jqlfgl 1' ' Q ' x ,, Q My ,,?z2zZz?f22ffff2?4m211122 A o ... . ' '-82 422232355532 ,,,,. - - ' -' '- ---'--' 1 .,,. X X , wf xow, : 3 I llIl IIIM lllll ll Y! llll - nm mu 'o f lll In I : nl null In H IIIII W,u,nHn Wnglllln m!,,,,,,,,,, ' ' ll fn' ' - ' 'IIIIIIII o nn ni l ' II wim N'1 '1 W III III v ,IIIIIIHII v !lJlH!!!!zI V H ,, M -Jw mmmm IW 'll'lll'lllIIl .-- - .3 1 ---- A li.s.....u - --- NIIIII Illlll Ill Ill 1 ii :.m:::::. ---W Qmmm 4 ,,o,,-s .-.f:.,.,,g :az- -:i '-1 .-- 1 4l funn' ill!!! lllll! Ill .lllll -- llll! lL , - ill Ill III III IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII NIIIIIIIIIII Ill' f II ll ll QII Ill Il Ill IIIIIIIIIIII lflllllllll NIIIIIIIIIII Ill' ll ll ll Il III Ill III IIIIIIIIIIII ummm wummm E ll ll ll Hmmm MMM mmm!!! MMHIINII ,, 1 X W l 1 l II ll ll ' ll I y ...- Y -. - .. -1, , , V -- M ' PQOPOSED 95322522 pnspfmvf ,www .sr Proposed Auditorium ana' Gymnaszum A '21-Q,-..- X- :g::'f'f. 1-2 3 V ..,.. c, X 9 .Q .X ,.,,--3.4-.K ,W ' ' .Q f ,J X X 1 ff: Ig , , , ,. .. 1. , Ak '.', nl! ,Aa 1' f l ' 5 fu . , I fyvjwx mx-Q. n I I s i , :P Y QM' ,cm I, 1 N 1 we Q I , bw if-Q Q, r' N s f xg 7 X M ,Hifi I 1 X I X 3 I I , X N k :1 , 5 , v ,gy K. 3 , rf, U A' S - L 'X n, 4' 'EQIW Q5 if fi io W EJ 2 A 1 a A h xlw V X Xp, I LL Max :ct mf 1 12 J, W, - 1 ' V-::,:f.-,af ': 95 YF ' in Ng'g,f .,A'2--C ,. v 7313- ,, , ffiiv . . ig '7' . 'M-2g,,.:,fQf, .7Fx A . 3 ,L 115' .x -M-.-fr:-1415 . .55 -M .... .,. Y

Page 20 text:

1 '4 . 51:3 '25 , Y ...xi g, fix Wiki .5 it .H my x a- X x ia-.. UA-fD:ie-Ma-+.fq v.,-w ' ' THE INVERTED FUTURE Phenomenona betray themselves to the human intellect in inumerable and diverse guises. The past is told by the historian, the literateur, the anthro- pologist, the geologist, the playwright, the statistician. The present is projected upon the past by the press, the pulpit, the school, the street. But the future can only be deducted in a very general manner by adding the past and present and dividing by some established common denominator. That denominator is experience. Truly there are certain individuals who have the sense of prophecy to an uncanny degree. But alas, they are not always available, nor are they always reliable. The future is revealed by the lines in the hand, the horoscope of the stars, the crystal gazer of unseen worlds, the oracles of hallowed places, the addicts of prognostic beverages and by local guessers. Out of all this array of future knowing cultists, we have had proficient instruction. But the philosopher Kant gives the most encouragement. He taught us that if during the millions of years mankind has developed all of the known senses that he now possesses, why is it not natural to expect some new sense to be evaginated through the years ofcontact and experience? We do know that there is a sixth sense. Not all of us have it, nor do any of us have it all the time, but to many of us has been given the novelty of its intermittent and sporadic visitations. Once do we recall one such experience. We saw the future as one walking backwards. We saw the future not as it is to be, but directly opposed to what will come to pass. To see the future in terms of opposites is not always gratifying, but if the saying that, Hwhatever is to come must come, is true, why not the converse, whatever can't, won't? This one memorable look into the inverted future must have partaken something of the nature of a dream, and all of the other hocuspocus that pro- fessional phophets employ. The vision was phantasmagorfic, colorful, a medley of impressions, a melange of emotions. We could scarcely realize the panorama that floated before us in such a collateral manner. Irene Canvin had already dimmed the glorious luster of Gloria Swanson's fame, and of all the new stars in Hollywood, the innocent, independent, inde- scribable Irene led all the rest. Her name was not only a by-word, but a sell- slogan of her company. In the fade out of her fame the lithesome characters of Billy White and Vivian Hoskins came dancing' before us. No longer has the terpsichore been mentioned with Pavlowa. and Puschkin, but has been revivified by the synco- pating meandering of these two. As these two artists flitted to the wings the personality of Mildred Campini, secretary to the Prince of Whales, was reflected before us. She still had her lTwc-:lvel