Arizona State University - Sun Devil Spark / Sahuaro Yearbook (Tempe, AZ)

Page 22 text:

lf we environmentalists are correct. . . then by becoming alarmed about it, we might be able to prevent an irreversible disaster. life-support system is knocked out, no one will be left to re- pair it. Once a species is lost, we cannot recover it. Thus, if really we wish to live beyond the present, we shall have to take risks in our daily lives, institute ways of skirting dis- aster, experiment with a host of survival plans, and get used to acting on the basis of imper- fect information. Sixthly, survival depends up- on our ability to fashion a con- crete survival scenario and get majorities of people of dif- soning of land and water re- sources and the steady flow of concrete smothering our farm land and forests. He has already anticipated some of our arguments and refuted them in the light of what he knows about the environ- ment and human nature. Most people deny death in- stinctively. For instance, there are many who see nothing new in our surroundings. They in- form us that humankind has met and conquered death be- fore and that it will do so again, they are the intended victim of disaster even when the signs are incontestable, as it was for the inmates of the concentration camps. If we environmentalists are correct in our diagnosis about the extent and immediacy of our survival crisis, then by be- coming alarmed about it we might be able to buy the time needed to prevent an ir- reversible disasterg if we are wrong, and no such disaster is in the offing, then we lose nothing by acting to prevent g -.gg--neg,-' .-g5.-1 j- .,g 4--Q' ,- '- '-.'f'-' -, 1 ..,y. 1 .- J, 4 4, J- , ' . ' c . , ---T.oi,f?'Ag: .L , - -I , K A , A ,-105. -jf ' ' 4- fa ' J' Q. R ' X war ....... ...-an-' ...g. .. 16-Environmental Crises ferent social, political, eco- nomic, psychological and cultural backgrounds to accept it quickly. Professor Reader recognizes our probable skepticism es- pecially regarding his belief that, life on earth is about to end for most, if not all, species - including our own. But he asserts that the evidence is all around us, in every oil spill and smog alert, in the sharp rise in the number of en- dangered species, in the poi- as an unlearned reflex. This view about humankind conquering death previously, assumes that people carry about their persons a survival mechanism that triggers auto- matically in the presence of death. This is just not true as the history of our species, especially as it has been played out in this century, attests. When confronted with death many people will tal acquiesce to it needlessly, passively and quiescently, or tbl deny that it. By acting as if an irreversible disaster was about to hit us, we are likely to improve both our environment and the quality of our daily lives in it. If you are wrong, then our decision to act cautiously and deliberately twhich is the implicit consequence of your general attitude! without haste and in good time, will simply hasten the advent of that dis- aster which we all wish to prevent. It is better to be slightly alarmed than slightly

Page 21 text:

Elllllllwllllllllmllll EEEUSES DOCDXASDAV REPORT tell us this. lf we are not the last generation of living people on this earth, then we are giving birth to the one that is. An unusual situation exists, therefore: simultaneously, we are becoming conscious of the fact that we are witnessing the earth's first remembered sur- vival crisis and that we, our- selves, are awaiting extinction. Secondly, not everyone agrees that our situation is ciritical. Some reject our assessment because they ro- manticize history and human nature, some, because they cannot be sure about the magnitude of our difficulties and over-estimate our abilities to manage them, some, be- cause they are caught in a web of parochial thinking and self- ish interests. Thirdly, it seems likely that we shall suffer an irreversible disaster within the foreseeable, rather than the remote, future. Thus, if we wish to prolong life beyond the present moment the decision-making time in which to do it is short. Fourthly, the crunch of time and the magnitude of our problems dictates that we act before all of the facts are in and without the as- surance that our actions will sustain us. lf we are to have a future, we must be able to rely upon the thoughtful creativ- ity of each other. Fifthly, we have only limited human, natural and techno- logical resources to commit to the struggle for existence. This de facto power shortage implies that we must gear our collective decisions and ac- tions to maximize life's chances and, simultaneously, free as many people as possible to engage in our mutal struggle for existence...Once a vital lf we really wish to live beyond the present, we shall have to take risks in our daily lives. . .

Page 23 text:

dead. The challenge of survival has become the burden of the common man. The professor believes that we are not likely to assume that responsibility unless we understand the nature and implication of our collective encounter with death. Firstly, our encounter with death persuades us that our situation in the world, and the world we inhabit, is new. Secondly, the death experi- ence restores limits to a world society, we have run up against a system of insurmountable restraints, or limits: to pro- duction, to consumption, to expansion, to growth, to frontiers and even to public behaviors, lt is now evident that we cannot do whatever we wish to do.We cannot consume very much more of the earth without consuming oursleves along with it. So, too, with expansion and growth. lt is now clearthat the earth frontier is closing. In many areas, we are tasting the limits of our relational lives. The appearance of limits present us with several unique opportunities. They enable us to replace the politics of power with the politics of environmental concern. Our crisis makes it unrealistic for us to consider our problems in any but a planetary, or whole-earth, contest. And this suggests that the time is ripe for a new and enlightened internationalism. An appreciation of the limits of our situation makes it pos- It is better to be slightly a'armed than slightly dead. that has been without them since the onset of the industrial revolution. Thirdly, the prospect of death forces us to live and act in the open and, equally, it introduces consensus into a perceptually fragmented world. What the crisis of survival does is impose a governor on our dizzy rate of change.More concretely, it means that forthe first time since the decline of Medieval Europe and the rise of the scientific-technological resources le.g., we are running out of arable agricultural lands in many parts of the worldl and facing the fact that we are effectively confined to this planet, unless and until we can transport large numbers. lt is likely that we shall have to grow without using up the earth. The only way in which I know how to do this is to grow internally, personally and culturally, rather than materi- ally and economically, by im- proving and enriching our sible - and not just desirable - for us to plan. By reducing the number of problems that we have to tackle head-on - to those that involve protec- tion of life-support systems and preservation of the species - they make it easier for many people to grasp what the crucial issues are and what must be done to overcome them. As we act to settle these problems we shall find, en pas- sant, that we shall be acting to resolve other problems - Environmental Crises-17