Vanderbilt University - Commodore Yearbook (Nashville, TN)

Page 23 text:

-sN THE COMETS 13 and now gives shelter to one of the chief departments of Vanderbilt University. His rulings and constructions of church law and parliamentary proceedings took shape in his Manual of the Discipline, and will live as precedents and rules for the guidance of those who shall come after him. His analysis of the Discipline he drew up in the shape of questions and answers, and left to the church his Catechism of Church Government. His views of Methodist history were embodied in what will hereafter be the standard Southern volume on that subject. His opinions on the various measures of the church administration were wise and large, and he did much to develop and systematize foreign missions, church extension, woman’s work, Sunday schools, and the literary and educa- tional interests of bis denomination. Aside from these more tangible products of his labor, he was a wise counselor. His advice was sought by all classes of men, and on all manner of subjects; and it is safe to say that his opinions given in answer to such calls will live on in an enduring stream of influence running through thousands of human lives. He was pre-eminently, and by common agreement, a far-sighted man. It was natural to his judgment to forecast, not at hap-hazard, but upon wise grounds. The writer once heard him deliver a masterly address upon “Pure English” (and it is needless to say to those who knew him, that the address was an exemplification of the theme), in which he took occasion to excoriate the wrong uses of the word GUESS; and the number of words suggested by him as suitable to take its place, such as reckon, judge, think, conclude, showed the solid sagacity and logical methods on which lie did most of his guessing. He had a genius for planning, for founding, for organizing, for investing, which was simply invaluable in the spero of action to which he was called. Of course, he made mistakes. His wonderful prescience still fell far short of that omniscience which alone can see the end from the beginning. He was not infallible—did not claim to be. 11 is pathetic confession of his own short-comings, as he conceived them, in a watch-night talk to the boys of Wesley Hall, some years ago, will never be forgotten by those who heard him then. He was a remarkably accurate judge of men on short acquaintance; yet he himself used to relate a humorous instance of how once in a dis- trict conference he totally misgauged the calibre of a preacher with whose high forehead he had become infatuated on first sight. Hut in his selection of special men for specific purposes, he was probably without a superior. This faculty caused him to rely on his own judgment to a degree greater than is common among men. Some thought that lie relied too much upon it; some thought that he relied upon it as against all other things. Perhaps it was rather as summing up all other things; for, until final action had been taken, he turned a deaf ear to no source of information or counsel, however humble.

Page 22 text:

12 THE COMETS- l)is short tarrying there as a tutor; his joining the itinerant phalanx of Southern Meth- odism within the first year of its organization; his youthful but efficient service in Virginia, in Alabama, in Mississippi, in Louisiana; his editorial work on the New Orleans Advocate, a paper which he founded; his membership and prominent position in the general conference? his call to the helm of the Nashville Advocate, and the steady hand that rested there in obedience to that call; his election to the episcopacy; his satis- factory discharge of his duties as president of great ecclesiastical bodies, and as codifier and expounder of the constitution of his church; the founding of Vanderbilt University, and his administration of the affairs of that instit ution, around which were clustered the fondest hopes of his heart. All these have been recounted and reviewed by able pens and eloquent tongues, and so the death of the great man has made for him a circle of larger and closer acquaintance. In reading these sketches of his career and estimates of his character, a stranger would perhaps suppose them marred by a certain extravagance of eulogy, which is but too common in the first expressions of sorrow. How far the cool, impartial criticism of the future may modify the opinions lately expressed, we cannot know. It may be that when the huge void created by his death shall be filled in by the compensations of time, when his work shall have been taken up by the adjusting hands of another generation, when our appalling sense of loss shall have been surprised by the resources and the supplies of Providence, When tears are brushed away from Sorrow's eyes. And she has clearer vision, when his life shall have been tried by the hard standards of a century's advance, if may be that his measure will seem less than now. Vet the probabilities are that it will seem greater; for, in whatever excesses of statement these first lamentations may have indulged, the twentieth century will hardly read them in the light of undiscriminating, commonplace obituaries; for, if Bishop McTyeire’s work has been characterized by one feature above all others, that feature has been that his work was wonderfully crystal- lized into permanent results. If he built a church edifice, he put it where it was needed, and where it would stand. He opposed the distribution of the publishing interests of his church, and the great book depot; at Nashville was centralized and solidified. He founded the New Orleans Christian Advocate, and it became one of the most powerful ecclesiastical journals of the South. He favored lay representation in the great legisla- tive conference, and it became the organic law of the church. He projected the estab- lishment of a theological seminary, and though a warm controversy ensued, in which the opposition was led by the gifted and eloquent Bishop Pierce, still Wesley Hall was built,

Page 24 text:

14 ■ THE COM ET: As an illustration of these two factors in his decisions, may bo quoted his view of those much-abused instruments of civilized introduction, letters of personal recommendation. “Y«s,” he said, not a year ago, “yes, I like to read them. But (what a tremendous emphasis he could give an adversative) they come cheap in these days. I'd rather talk with a man half an hour than read his whole budget of recommendations.” He made mistakes; of course he made them. But it is simply marvelous what a way the almanac had of straightening up those mistakes. His failures had a wonderful knack of reappearing as successes. In conference work ho often surprised even the presiding elders, with whom the bishops were wont to advise on such matters, by mak- ing some unexpected and apparently unsuitable appointment; but many who at that time thought his judgment at fault, afterward acknowledged that events justified his decision. In the exercise of the power committed to his hands as a bishop, he was compelled at times to subject men to inconvenience and hardship. He sometimes saw that it was necessary to sacrifice the one for the good of the many. He took a broad view of church needs and church work. His eye swept the whole field, and he issued his commands from the standpoint of headquarters. He was a much misjudged man. This, to some extent at least, was inevitable. He was placed in a position where every act was closely scrutinized, and fearlessly, 1 might almost say mercilessly, criticized. How well he bore this scrutiny and this criticism, let the mourning Methodist church, from Oregon to Florida, testify. Most of his acts affected numbers of men, and involved conflicting interests. This necessitated disap- pointment and dissatisfaction, and it too often resulted in prejudice and harsh judgment. This prejudice was often intensified by the Bishop’s reserved and secretive caution, together with the unshakable tenacity with which he clung to his decisions when once made. His judgments he would state in the face of an adverse multi- tude; his reasons he would tell to few or none. “Brethren.” his slow reply came to two preachers who had come to his room after conference to intercede in behalf of a fellow-preacher who thought that he had been wronged in his appointment, “I have thought carefully over those appointments; I have taken counsel concerning them; 1 have prayed about them; BUT THEY ABE MADE.” And his two interviewers knew that in those words there was all the emphasis of Gibraltar. Bishop McTveire was often judged by outward appearance—seldom a safe test of motive and character. His very voice and manner belied his real nature. His tones were loud and sonorous, insomuch that the London papers, during his attendance upon the Ecumenical Conference, compared his voice to a foghorn; yet that voice knew how to croon and prattle to a little child, and to whisper words of comfort and strength