University of Toronto Engineering Society - Skule Yearbook (Toronto, Ontario Canada)

Page 23 text:

« .j i ¥ mem % -rsA Left: The Entrepre- neurial Design winning automatic solar control valve is displayed here by its designer, Lewis Kaiserseder. Bottom: First place Editorial Communication speaker Daryl Wilson discusses hazardous and toxic chemical waste dis- posal and treatment. OEDC ’82 WINNERS Entrepreneurial Design 1. Lewis Kaiserseder (Toronto) 2 . Greg Wowchuk (Windsor) 3 . Alexander Winch (Queen’s) Corporate Design 1. Lawrence Kwan, Albert Li (Toronto) 2 . Keith Scott (Queen’s) 3 . Paul Blom, Jack Chappell (Toronto) Editorial Communications 1. Daryl C. F. Wilson (Toronto) 2 . Robert Poisson, Bruce Tanaka (Guelph) 3 . Bill Nickle, Mike Belanger (Western) Explanatory Communications 1. Joe Facca (Toronto) 2 . Nicholas A. C. Mumford (RMC) 3 . Greg Evans, Robin Augustine (Toronto) design allowed the competitors to propose a solution to a problem they have identified in the Canadian marketplace. Editorial Communications required the argument and defense of a policy or plan of action, and Explanatory Communications involved the concise description of a technical issue or topic of social significance. Four teams of five judges each adjudicated the Competition. The judges were dr awn from distinguished engineers and businessmen and women from industry, government, and academia. The judges were consistently impressed with the high degree of quality in the designs and presentations. The Competition was very professionally run from beginning to end. It enjoyed an excellent central location on campus at University College. Because of the accessible location, the Competition was very well- attended by a wide variety of people. The quality and number of U of T entries were reflected in the outcome of the Competition. Toronto entrants swept first place in all four categories. The winners were: Lewis Kaiserseder (Mech 8T3) Entrepreneurial Design; Albert Li and Lawrence Kwan (Mech 8T2) Corporate Design; Daryl Wilson (Chem 8T2) Editorial Communications; and Joe Facca (Elec 8T2) Explanatory Communications. The success of the Competition was the result of several months of hard work by the OEDC Committee, especially Brett Calder, Ira Rotenberg, Sean Gregorio, Anne Parravano, and Louie Wilson. These people are to be heartily congratulated on the obvious success of their efforts. Queen’s University Engineering Society will host the 1983 Ontario Engineering Design Competition. They will have a difficult time surpassing the achievements of OEDC ’82.

Page 25 text:

“Places for ACT I,” echoed over the P.A. backstage. The audience was anxiously shuffling their programs while the band played “Bandstand Boogie”. Was the cast ready? Was the crew ready? Was Parvez ready? Was the audience ready? Ready for what? Nevertheless, once again the curtains opened for another Skule Nite theatrical extravaganza . SKULE NITE 8T2, as in past years, has retained its reputation as the most popular show on campus with four solid, sold out performances at Hart House Theatre February 3, 4, 5, and 6. Audiences were treated to colourful variations of comedy and dance in sketches such as Love Trek, Slave of Duty, My Fair Leader, and Dudley Doright. This year’s cast of 36 rehearsed and performed with an enthusiasm unseen in the past few years. The cast was composed mostly of engineering students and included the return of veterans Gail Hakala, Steve Roberts, Wayne Levin, Paul Cochrane, Ella Lund-Thomsen, and Ira Rotenberg. The Director, Parvez Patel, and Producer, Judith Vosko, as well as Choreographers, Kathy Dube and Colleen Harrington, are to be congratulated on the success of the show. And as for this review, any resemblance between it and the show is purely coincidental and should be ignored. After all, SKULE NITE never writes its own reviews. What, never? Well hardly ever. 21