St Michaels University School - Black Red and Blue Yearbook (Victoria, British Columbia Canada)

Page 33 text:

UNIVERSITY SCHOOL Gerry, l.b.w. Crvsdalt '.... ....,....,..v,,... I 5 Queale, run out ......,.,.,..................... l Moffat, ct. Harrison b. Irvine ........,, 33 Greenhouse, ct. Tvnan b. Irvine ....., 10 Shanks, b, Irvine ............,........,,....,.... 9 Higgs I. et. Tynan b, Irvine .....,.,.... 5 Little. ciib, Crysdale .....................,., U Stamer. st. Tynan b. Irvine .........,.Y.. 3 Coleman, not out .,.......,.......,.. ....... l 2 McLeod II, b. Irvine .,......... ...... 1 Extras .,.,,........,,.,.,.,...ss ..,... 0 Total ....... .,.. ,.,,..........,....... , ST. GEORGES SCHOOL Fletcher. l.b.w. Greenhouse ',....,.....,.. U Young. ct. Pollard b. Stzuner .,..,,,,,... U Irvine. b. Greenhouse -... ..... ....,., l 5 5 Tvnan, b, Stanier .....,..... ...... l U Anton, b. Greenhouse ...,..,.... .,.....,.. f I Hopkins, b. Greenhouse ....... ....,,.,.... l 5 Pollard I, ct. Fletcher b. Crysdale.. U Harrison. b. Greenhouse ....,..,..,..,...... lil Ferrie, run out ................,...,.,,..........,. T Ramage, ct. Pollard b. Greenhouse..l6 Gilmore, not out ................................ I Extras .........................,.,.... ...........v. 1 5 Total .,.........,.....,.. ....... 7 l SCHOOL V. H.NI.C.S. VENTURE H.M.C.S. Venture proved no match for the School side and the game was a poor one. Greenhouse. Mofifat and Shanks shared the wickets. and Queale and Moffat knocked off what few runs were required without being separated. SCHOOL V. SHAWNIGAN LAKE SCHOOL In response to a score of 79 the School gave a spineless display of batting. The out cricket was adequate, Greenhouse's 3 for 5 in seven overs being outstanding. SHAVVNIGAN LAKE SCHOOL Jones, ct. Moffat b. Shanks .............. 35 Read, ct. Greenhouse b. Stamer ...... l Brooks, b. Shanks ...................,.......... O McGax'in I. b. Greenhouse .............. l Kaye I. ct. Gerry b, Greenhouse ..,. ll Douglas, l.b.w. Greenhouse v............. 1 Cuppage, l.b.w. Higgs II ...........,....., 8 McGavin II. ct. Queale b. Shanks.. 9 Crisp, b. Higgs II ............................ fl Robertson I, not out ............,.,..,........ 3 Vandersluis, did not bat ...,.., ....... 0 Extras ......................,...... ....... l O Total ..,..,. .,....,................,..... 7 9 UNIVERSITY SCHOOL Greenhouse, l.b.w. Yandersluis ......., 3 Queale, ct. McGavin b. Cuppage .... 4 I Moffat, b. Cuppage .......................... Shanks. ct. McGavin b. Yandersluis l Higgs I, b. Cuppage .......................... 2 Gerry, ct. McGavin b. Cuppage ...... 3 Pollard I, b. Yandersluis ,....,.......,.... O -1 Little, ct. McGavin b. Yandersluis., - Coleman, ct. Yandersluis b. Cuppage ...........,,.........,,............ 0 Higgs II, b. Cuppage ..,..... ....... 0 Stamer. not out .,......... ,,,..., O Extras ....,...,.,........... ,.,,,,. 6 Total .,.............. ,.,.,,. SCHOOL V. R. WENMAN'S XI The School did well to dispose of the opposition for 59, and when they came to bat Bloffat made quick work of knocking off the runs. MR. WENMAIVS XI Shanks. J., run out ........................,... 19 Whittaker, ct. Greenhouse b. Shanks 0 Hendra. l.b.w. Shanks ...................... 3 Seale. ct. Gerry b. Shanks ...,...,........ 4 Farrell. run out ..,........,.,.,..... ....... 4 Kay, b. Queale ..........,...,.....,..,.,.. .... 7 Merston, c.8tb. Queale .,,.,,.......,,.,...., 0 Hanlon, c.8tb. Higgs II .................... 2 Wenman, R., ct. Pollard b. Higgs I..l0 VVenman, J., not out ..,.............,....... 5 Shanks, M., l.b.w. Gerry ,....,............ 1 Extras ..................,....,,.,,. .,...,, 4 Total ....... ,...,,, 59 UNIVERSITY SCHOOL Moffat, b, Shanks ,,.,,,.,......,......... 49 Queale. b. Hendra ............................ 3 Higgs I. b, Kay .................................. 5 Greenhouse, ct. Kay b. J. Shanks ..., 5 Higgs II, ct. Merston b. J. Shanks.. 2 Shanks. c.8tb. Seale .......................... 0 Gerry, not out .................... .... 7 Stamer, b. J. Shanks ....... ....... T Pollard. did not bat ....... ....... 0 Little. did not bat .........., ....... 0 Coleman, did not bat ..,..... ....... 0 Extras ............................. ......, 3 Total ....... ....... 8 l

Page 32 text:

SCHOOL V. MR. R. WENMAN'S XI The School bowlers came in for punishment, although Moffat took 5 for 38. Gerry and Queale batted well at the beginning of the School innings but lNfIoffat was soon out and. with the others batting poorly. the School was still 38 runs short at the close. and, with only one wicket in hand. were luckv to draw. MR. R. WENM.-XN'S XI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL Goddard. l.b.w. Moffat .................... Queale, ct. Rooper b. Goddard ........ 26 Hendra. b. Shanks ..S....,..i.......w......... Gerry, l.b.w. Fulton ....,.............,....... 21 Calton, st, Queale b. Moffat ..,...,..... 28 Moffat. b. Fulton .............................. 3 Rooper, b, Moffat ............................ - Greenhouse. b. Fulton ...................... O Fulton. b. Moffat ...,......,........ ..... 0 Little. ct. Berrisford b. Fulton .......... 4 Burnett, H. C., run out ......... ..... 2 3 Shanks, b. Goddard ...........,....,......... 2 Berrisford, b. Stamer .,,............. ..... 3 Higgs I, b. Goddard ................. ..... 5 McNeill, run out ....................,........... Coleman. b, Fulton ....... ..... 3 Burnett, H. E., c.8:b. Moffat ............ Stamer. b. Fulton ............ ..... 0 Wenrnan, J.. not out ................ ...., P ollard I. not out ............... ..... 3 Wenman, R., did not bat ....... ..... 0 McLeod II, did not bat ........ ..... 0 Extras ............,..................... ..... 5 Extras ................,.,.......,...... ......... 1 Total ,.......................,............... 106 Total ...................,....... .,,....., 6 8 SCHOOL V. SHAWNIGAN LAKE SCHOOL The School won an excellent game at Shawnigan Lake by three runs. Shanks and Greenhouse showed promise with the bat and, with Higgs I and Nfoffat also reaching double figures. the School totalled 70. The School out cricket was quite good. Stamer 15 for 177 and Shanks sl for 42N bowled unchanged. Both Moffat and Little took beautiful catches. ' UNIVERSITY SCHOOL SH.-XWNIGAN LAKE SCHOOL Queale, l.b.w. Vandersluis .............,,. jones. ct. Moffat b. Shanks ...,.......... 0 Gerry, l.b.w. Vandersluis ,................. Brooks, b. Stamer ,....,..,......... ..... 7 Greenhouse, ct. Kaye b. Cuppage .... Douglas, b. Shanks ................ ......... 7 Moffat. b. Cuppage .......................... Kaye I. l.b.w. Stamer ........................ 16 Shanks, st. McGavin b. Crisp .......... Read I. ct. Little b. Shanks .............. 24 Higgs I, l.b.w. Crisp .......................... Smith, b. Stamer .................... ..... 0 Little, b. Crisp .................... ..... C uppage, run out ......... ...... 1 Pollard I, not out ................... ..... M cGavin, b. Stamer ........ ...... 3 Coleman, b. Vandersluis ....... ..... C risp, not out ..................... ..... 1 Stamer. b. Crisp ..................... ..... K aye II, b, Stamer ............,... ..... 0 Dayton. ct. Brooks b, Crisp ...... ..... X i'anders1uis. ct. Greenhouse Extras ..................................,.. ..... b . Shanks ............................ ..... 1 - Extras ................................. ..... 7 Total ..... ........ 7 O - Total ..................... ........ 6 7 SCHOOL V. ST. GEORGE'S SCHOOL A close game in Vancouver resulted in the defeat of the School bv three runs. Of the School batsmen only Nfoffat had any success against some mediocre bowling. Greenhouse lwho took six for thirty- ninel bowled well. and seven wickets fell for thirty-eight runs. The St. George's tail played with courage and luck. and the School, who missed vital catches and were sadly lacking in anticipation, allowed a game which thev should have won to slip away from their grasp. 28

Page 34 text:

FIRST ELEVEN CHARACTERS MOFFAT CCaptainJ-As a batsman his defence was adequate, though his bat was never quite straight, especially when playing back. When attacking the bowling he hit with great power, scoring all round the wicket, but particularly on the leg side. lN'ith the ball he was successful at times, but his action was poor and he seldom maintained a length. In the field he was magnificent, his anticipation and agility enabling him to make catches which others would not recognize as such look easy. As a Captain he was experienced, and led the side with enthusiasm. QUE.-XLE fYice-Captainl-A patient opening batsman with a fair defence. Strong on the leg side and drives quite well when set, but hangs his bat out on the off and is very prone to be l.b.w. A good judge of a run. Keeps wicket very well. HIGGS I-As a batsman he hit straight and to leg with power, but his defence, though improved. was not adequate. A poor runner between the wickets. Lacking in concentration in the field. STAMER-Successful with the ball on occasion, and would be more so with increased zest and hostility. As a batsman he lacked confidence and his forward play was weak. but here. again. he showed promise. A keenness and a will to excel must be substituted for his present lethargy. GERRYfInclined to over-reach when playing forward and too often fails to get to the pitch of the ball. He is also very prone to be l.b.w. He is, however, a very promising batsman with a good defence and the left- hander's liking for the drive. Extremely keen, and when his attitude and his action develop some crispness and decision he will make runs. Very poor between the wickets as yet. l'Vith the ball he has more ability than he himself realizes and wickets are in store for him. Unaccountably bad in the field, both in the air and on the ground: much practice is required. GREENHOUSE-At present he is very edgy as a batsman and his defensive forward play is weak. Must learn to attack the bowling with his full reach and weight. Much improved with the ball. and with more confidence and experience will do very well. Slow, but reasonably safe in the field. HIGGS ll-A left-arm bowler of sufficient pace who came on considerably late in the season. Useful in the field. SHANKS-Improved greatly with bat and ball. As a batsman he is free and shows promise of runs when playing forward. Distinctly promising with the ball, turning a little both ways and maintaining a reasonable length. In the field he is fairly safe in the air but extremely slow on the ground, and lacking in anticipation and concentration. Very keen on the game and has the right temperament. CQLEM.eXNfShowed promise with the bat and gained useful experience. In the field he proved to be a safe catch but uncertain on the ground. PQLLARD leNew to the game and made a promising start. Failed with the bat in matches, but will yet succeed as a hitter. Tried his hand with the ball and performed creditably. Very useful in the field, where his hands were safe and his throwing fast and accurate. LITTLE-lN'ith the bat he came on considerably. especially in defence. Cnc of the best fields-rs on the side, both on the ground and in the air. A promising wicket keeper with courage and a desire to learn. W.R.G.VY. 30