Armour Institute of Technology - Cycle Yearbook (Chicago, IL)

Page 78 text:

Bcrgquist, Dworsky, Styrsky, Rehling, Knabc, Savidis, Fogle, Wolniak D. Stevens, Doudera, Penzel. Nylen, Petters, Galandak. McMullen, Vormiltag Tallitsch, Zwisder, Bottelson. Olufsen, Ramotowski, Braucr. Ikenn, McGrath question of standardized class jewelry. These matters were thrashed out thoroughly and to the satisfaction of the majority of the class. As will be found in every engineering cur- riculum, there is little time for social life and activities. In spite of this, however, we knew that an extra-curricular activity should be in everyone’s program. With this in view we entered into a very successful year of outside activities. The class was represented in every field; News, Cycle, Engineer, Orchestra, and varsity sports. Our first taste of social life at the Institute was the Freshman Handshake, where amid cider and doughnuts we had our first view of what the rest of the school looked like. We found there a feeling of welcome which we certainly appreciated. In our sophomore year, however, our big event was the Freshman-Sophomore Dance, which everyone agreed was a big success. By do- ing this we upheld the tradition of the en- tering class as well as further advancing the O. Nelson, Parsons, U'aldcmann, Muck, Schmidt, Gam, Wichlacz, Docdc, Collins. W. Flcig, Hoffman, Quaylc Norris, Francis. Wicting, Christensen, Land, Gruca, W. Gray, Endert, Viehe-Nacss. Rice. Wasylciw, J. Meyer Pattison, Freircich, Breh. Knaus, Howell, Luce, Majercik, Rootberg, Strazz, Kaplan, Edmunds, Ramirez Stein, Bcjcck, Lischcr, Van Scoyoc, Cordcs, J. Larson, R. Johnson, Scott, Micczkowski. D. Fleig, Linden, F. L. Smith Sixty-fight

Page 77 text:

I.inon, Zwinlcr Scott, Peterson, Hushes OFFICERS John O. Larson John C. Scott PreiiJent Secretary Gordon A. Zwisslcr Ray. A. Peterson Vice-PretiJent Treaiurtr I. Murray Hughes Social Chairman SOPHOMORES With the summer of 1934 coming into view, we stop to relax and to look back on one of the hardest of the four school years. Upon entering on our work in the sopho- more year it was much different than when we entered the year previous. Instead of be- ing timid as we were in our freshman year, we came back with that spirit which all sophomores have, the determination to suc- ceed. We accomplished what had been con- templated for some time; we made the fresh- men wear green hats. The green hats brought out the college spirit at Armour to a large extent. It was the duty of the Sophomores to see that the freshmen wore the hats. This we did with a great deal of zeal. In fact, we were so zealous that the green hat idea was abandoned after the Thanksgiving vacation. This was to save the freshmen from being completely annihilated. It was much different entering school as a sophomore. We saw things differently, we acted differently, we had a new feeling of confidence about us which we knew would be hard to beat. Although we did not fully real- ize it at the time the year started, this feeling of confidence was to be sorely tried by the difficult subjects in the sophomore program. We, as individuals, had to work very hard to keep abreast of our fellow students. In our freshman year we started in as strangers but in our sophomore year all this was different. We had our friendships which had started the year before. These friendships were a great benefit to us all through the year. With the progress of our sophomore year we began to find that where there were more people more things were discovered. So it was with us, and instead of playing the game of solitaire, we found a feeling of mutual interest which we feel sure will stay with us for many years to come. Although many of our class were players on varsity squads in their first year, the second year brought forth an even larger number of varsity candidates and regulars. In the inter-class events such as track, baseball, and basketball our class teams did their best against older and more experienced players. As freshmen we painted the school green and in general defied all the other classes. As sophomores the shoe was on the other foot. We found it necessary to discipline the freshman class for the appear- ance of too much green about the school. At our first sophomore class meeting we inaugu- rated the idea of having a sophomore class jacket which would be worn the remaining years in school. This would be a substitute for the senior jacket which could be worn only a few months. With this also came the Sixty-iccen

Page 79 text:

Hell . Rothschild, Kraemer, Dunn, A. Line, Mandelowit?, Papas, Simons Nichmin, Tumi, Grevnman, Dombrowski, Horwitz, Lisciini, Cotterman, Aulcr Hickey, Denny, F. Schmidt, Pantone, Costello, R. W'm, Schmidt, Boberg, Bill Freshman-Sophomore relations. At this time, with our second year behind us, we find, as all other classes have before us, that our ranks have thinned out. We who arc left, however, find ourselves bound together with a bond of true friendship. We feel that we, the picked members of one of the largest classes ever to enter the Institute, are the men of that class who have the ability to keep going until we conquer. We knew from all previous reports that this year would be our stumbling block. It has been; not however, to a very great ex- tent, and reviewing our ranks we find that we have been quite successful in passing the first two years of our four years in college. This year, which we have just completed, has undoubtedly been a colorful one. It has had its good and its bad times, the latter, however, being heavily outweighed. It has been hard work, but we enjoyed it, realizing it has been an aid to us in the struggle to accomplish our goal. With the knowledge we have obtained, we will now branch out, each with his own ideas and each with his Wltalon, McMillan, Kercher, Chapman, Orirnby, Gilkison, Rulis, Engstrom, Kreft, D’Arco Zmeskal, Clark, Balai, Johnsen, Paulsen, B. Lane, J. Smith. Malinowski, R. Stevens, Tallafuss Kahlcs, Sturgeon, L. Siegel, Smetana, Shunt, Robbie. Freund. Millcvillc. Ragan, Hagenauer Sixly-nint